chapter-ii experimental 2. 1. tea samples and...
TRANSCRIPT
57
CHAPTER-II
EXPERIMENTAL
2. 1. Tea samples and chemicals
Commercial green tea (United Nilgiris Tea Estate Co. Ltd, Coimbatore) and
black tea (Tata Kannan Devan tea-Kolkatta) were purchased from local departmental
store, Erode, Tamil Nadu, India. The purchased tea samples were consequently
subjected to analysis for the present study. All the chemicals used in this work were
of analytical grade. The chemicals used in this work are listed in Table 2.1. All the
solutions and reagents were prepared from triply distilled water.
Table 2.1. List of Chemicals
Name of the chemicals
Grade/purity
Make
Acetonitrile
HPLC grade
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Acetyl acetone
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Agar
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Ammonia
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Ammonium acetate
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Ammonium hydroxide
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Ammonium molybdate
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Ammonium sulphate
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Anthrone reagent
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Ascorbic acid
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
2,2’-azino-bis (3-
ethylbenzothiazoline-6-
sulfonic acid) [ABTS]
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
58
Acetic acid
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Bromophenol blue
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Caffeine
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Butanol
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
(+) Catechin
AR
Sigma-Aldrich, Bengaluru
Chloro auric acid 3H2O
AR
Loba Chemie
Citrate buffer
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Chloroform
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl hydrazyl
radical [DPPH]
AR
Sigma-Aldrich, Bengaluru
(+)- Dextrose
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Distilled water
HPLC grade
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Dimethyl sulphoxide
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Dipotassium hydrogen
phosphate
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Disodium hydrogen phosphate
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Ethanol
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Ethedium bromide
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Ethyelenediamine tetra acetic
acid (EDTA)
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Ethyl acetate
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Ferrous ammonium sulphate
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Ferrous sulphate
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Ferric chloride
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Flucanazole
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
59
Folin-Ciocalteu’s reagent
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Gentamycin
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Gallic acid
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Glacial acetic acid
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Hydrogen peroxide
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Hydrochloric acid
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Isobutyl methyl ketone
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Magnesium sulphate
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Methanol
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Nitric acid
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Perchloric acid
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Phosphate buffer
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Potassium chlorate
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Potassium chloride
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Potassium persulphate
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Peptone
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Potassium hydroxide
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Potassium ferricyanide
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Potassium hexacyanoferrate
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Pyrocatechol
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Pyrogallol
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Salicylic acid
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
60
Silver nitrate
AR
Sigma-Aldrich, Bengaluru
Sodium hydroxide
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Sodium chloride
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Sodium carbonate
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Sodium sulphate (anhydrous)
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Sodium nitrate
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Sucrose
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Sulphuric acid
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Trichloro acetic acid
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Tris-Hcl buffer
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Vanillin
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
Yeast
AR
S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai
2. 2. Extract preparation
2.2.1. Extract preparation for estimation of polyphenol and catechins
About 70% (v/v) ethanol was prepared using distilled water and was kept in a
water bath for 30 min at 70°C. 2 g of powdered black and green tea samples were taken
in a centrifuge tube and 5 ml of hot 70% (v/v) ethanol was added to it. The mixture was
kept in a water bath maintained at 70°C with intermittent stirring. It was then
centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatants were transferred to 10 ml standard
measuring flask. The residual waste was subsequently extracted again with 5 ml of 70%
(v/v) hot ethanol for 10 min. The contents were pooled and made up to the volume with
cold 70% (v/v) ethanol. 1 ml of the extract was diluted to 100 ml with distilled water
61
and directly used for the estimation of total polyphenols and total catechins. For
reducing sugar, 1 ml of the extract was diluted with 10 ml of distilled water.
2. 2.2. Extract preparation for antioxidant assay
Tea extracts for antioxidant assay was prepared by solvent extraction method
[1]. 50 g of powdered green and black tea samples were added to 200 ml of ethanol
and water separately. The mixture was kept for 24 h in tightly sealed vessel at room
temperature, protected from sunlight and stirred several times with a sterile glass
rod. This mixture was filtered through Whatman No.1 filter paper and the residue
was adjusted to the required concentration (50 ml of solvent for the residue of 50 g
of tea) with the extraction fluid of further extraction and it was repeated thrice and a
clear colourless supernatant extraction liquid was finally obtained. The extracted
liquid was subjected to rotary evaporation in order to remove the solvents. Then the
extract was stored in an airtight container at 4•C in refrigerator for further use.
2.3. Biochemical Analysis
2. 3.1. Estimation of total polyphenols
Polyphenols in both teas were estimated according to ISO procedure [2].
Briefly, 1 ml of diluted extract was mixed with 5 ml of 10 % (v/v) Folin- Ciocalteu’s
reagent and 4 ml of 7.5 % (w/v) sodium carbonate solution. The mixture was shaken
vigorously and kept aside for completion of the reaction. After 1 h, the blue colour
developed was measured at 765 nm against reagent blank in Perkin Elmer Lambda
35 UV-Visible spectrophotometer. The total polyphenols present in tea extracts were
calculated from the calibration curve obtained for gallic acid of known
concentrations and the results were expressed in gallic acid equivalent as mg/g.
62
2. 3.2. Determination of total catechins
Total catechins were measured by following the method of Swain and Hills
[3]. 2 ml of the diluted extract was kept under ice cold condition and 6.5 ml of ice
cold acidified vanillin reagent was added to it and the contents were diluted to 10 ml
with distilled water. It was shaken well and allowed to stand for 15 min for
completion of the reaction. Absorbance of the orange colour developed was
measured at 500 nm against the reagent blank using a UV-Visible
spectrophotometer. The amount of catechins present in tea leaves extracts were
calculated using the calibration curve of known concentrations of (+) catechin and
the results were expressed in (+) catechin equivalents as mg/g.
2. 3.3. Measurement of total reducing sugars
Hedge and Hofreiter [4] method was adopted for determination of total
reducing sugars in both teas. Briefly, to 2 ml of the diluted extract kept under ice
cold condition, 4.0 ml of ice cold anthrone reagent was added. The test tube with
content was heated in a boiling water bath for 8 min and cooled under running water.
Absorbance of the green colour developed was measured at 630 nm against the
reagent blank using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer. The amount of reducing sugar
present in tea leaves extracts was calculated using the calibration curve of known
concentrations of (+) dextrose and the results were expressed in (+) dextrose
equivalent as mg/g.
2.3.4. Estimation of caffeine
Caffeine content of tea was determined according to Ronald and Ronald
method [5]. About 1 g of the powdered tea sample was taken in a 125 ml separating
63
funnel and to which 5 ml of 40 % (v/v) aqueous ammonia was added and extracted
with three 25 ml portions of chloroform. The pooled chloroform layer was shaken
well with 10 ml of 1 % (w/v) potassium hydroxide solution. The chloroform layer
was filtered through anhydrous sodium sulphate and made up to 100 ml with
chloroform. Absorbance of the solution was measured at 274 nm in Perkin Elmer
Lambda-35 UV-Vis spectrophotometer against blank. The amount of caffeine was
calculated from the calibration curve obtained with 5 to 25 ppm of standard caffeine
and the results were expressed in mg/g.
2. 3.5. Determination of theaflavins and thearubigins
Theaflavins and thearubigins were estimated according to Thanaraj and
Seshadri method [6]. About 2 g of tea sample was taken in a 250 ml conical flask, to
which, 100 ml of freshly boiled distilled water was added and the contents were
infused over the boiling water bath for 10 min with intermittent shaking. It was then
filtered through cotton wool and the analysis was carried out as per the scheme in
Flow chart 2.1. The solvent extraction of tea extract was carried out in separating
funnels with adequate shaking at every stage. Contents of theaflavin (TF),
thearubigin (TR), highly polymerised substances (HPS) and total liquor colour
(TLC) were calculated from the absorbance values (A to E as given in Flow chart
2.1) as follows.
TF % = 4.313 x C
TR % = 13.643 x (B+D-C)
HPS % = 13.643 x E
TLC % = 10 x A
64
where A, B, C, D, E are the absorbance values from the Flow chart 2.1. DMC- Dry
matter content. Multiplication factors for the calculation of TF and TR were derived
from molar extinction coefficient of pure compounds and dilution fraction. HPS was
represented as TR. In the case of TLC, factor 10 was the dilution factor.
Flow chart 2.1. Estimation of TF, TR, HPS and TLC in green & black tea
65
2.3.6. Measurement of total proteins and lipids
The amount of nitrogen was measured using well known Kjeldahl method
[7]. The protein was calculated by multiplying the amount of nitrogen by a
factor 6.25. Total lipid content was measured according to the literature [8]. 1 g of
the dried leaf powder was added to 25 ml of chloroform and methanol mixture
(2:1) in a separating funnel, to which 5 ml of 0.9 % (w/v) sodium chloride was
added and the mixture was shaken well, allowed to stand till the separation of
layers and the chloroform layer was carefully transferred to a pre weighed
china dish. The entire extraction procedure was repeated twice with two more
25 ml portions of chloroform and methanol mixture. The pooled chloroform
extract was evaporated to dryness on a boiling water bath. The china dish with
lipids were dried and weighed again. From the difference in weights, the
percentage of lipids present in the leaf material was calculated gravimetrically and
expressed in %.
2. 3.7. Estimation of moisture content
Moisture content was estimated according to Indian Standard [9]. A known
weight of tea sample was taken in a weighing bottle and it was kept in hot air oven
maintained at 103oC for 16 h. The dried tea sample was weighed and dry matter
content was computed. From the dry matter content, moisture content was calculated
according to the formula.
Moisture content (%) = (100 – Dry matter content)
66
2. 3.8. Estimation of individual catechins
Individual catechins were measured according to ISO procedure [10], a
simple method developed for estimation of ECG, C, EC, EGCG and EGC. About 0.2
g of tea powder was extracted using 10 ml of 70 % (v /v) ethanol maintained at 70
°C. 1 ml of the extract was diluted to 5 ml with stabilizing solution. The stabilizing
solution was prepared by mixing 0.025 % (w/v) each of EDTA and ascorbic acid and
10 % (v/v) acetonitrile in HPLC grade water. It was prepared as fresh on the day of
use and was filtered through 0.45 µ nylon membrane filter, and used for HPLC
analysis.
Mobile phase A – 2 % (v/v) acetic acid in 9 % (v/v) acetonitrile in water,
mobile phase B – 80 % (v/v) acetonitrile in water. The gradient programme is as
follows.
- Flow rate of mobile phase: 1.0 ml /min.
- Binary gradient conditions: 100 % mobile phase A for 10 min, then over 15 min a
linear gradient to 68 % mobile phase A, 32 % mobile phase B and hold at this
composition for 10 min. Then, reset to 100 % mobile phase A and allowed to
equilibrate for 10 min before next injection.
A Phenomenex Luna 5 µm phenyl – hexyl column (250 mm length x 4.6 mm
internal diameter) fitted with a Phenomenex Security Guard 4 mm x 3 mm phenyl
hexyl bonded cartridge was used for the analysis. The column was maintained at 35
± 0.5 °C. The absorbance of compounds was measured at the wave length of 278 nm
using UV – detector. Integration and calculations were carried out using HP
Chemstation software.
67
2.4. Antioxidant activities
2.4.1. DPPH radical scavenging activity
Free radical scavenging effect was estimated according to the method of Zhu
et al. [11]. Briefly, a 1mM DPPH radical -solution in ethanol was prepared, and 1 ml
of this solution was mixed with 3 ml (20-100 µg) each of ethanol and water extract
of tea. The mixture was then vortexed vigorously and left for 30 min at room
temperature in the dark and the absorbance was measured for various concentrations
at 517 nm with Perkin Elmer Lambda UV-Visible spectrophotometer. A control
sample containing the same amount of water and DPPH radical was prepared and
measured at the same wavelength. All determinations were carried out in triplicates.
The DPPH radical scavenging activity was calculated as follows,
2.4.2. Ferric reducing power
The method of Yildirin et al. [12] was adopted for the estimation of reducing
power. Exactly 1 ml (20-100 µg) each of ethanol and water extract of tea was mixed
with 2.5 ml of phosphate buffer (0.2 M, pH 6.6) and 2.5 ml of 1% (w/v) potassium
ferricyanide. The mixture was incubated at 50o
C for 30 min, afterwards, 2.5 ml of
10 % (v/v) trichloroacetic acid was added to the mixture and centrifuged at 3000
rpm for 10 min. Finally, 2.5 ml of the upper layer was pipetted out and mixed with
2.5 ml of distilled water and 0.5 ml of 0.1% (w/v) ferric chloride was added. The
absorbance of the extracts was measured for various concentrations at 700 nm using
a Perkin Elmer Lambda 35 UV-Visible Spectrophotometer. The increased
68
absorbance of the reaction mixture indicated increased reducing power. The
experiments were carried out in triplicates.
2.4.3. ABTS radical scavenging activity
To determine ABTS radical scavenging assay, the method of Re et al. [13]
was adopted. The stock solutions included 7mM ABTS and 2.4 mM potassium
persulphate. The working solution was then prepared by mixing the two stock
solutions in equal quantities and allowing them to react for overnight at room
temperature in the dark. The solution was then diluted by mixing 1 ml of ABTS
solution with 60 ml ethanol to obtain an absorbance of 0.706 ± 0.001 units at 734
nm. Fresh ABTS solution was prepared for each assay. The tea extract (1 ml) (20-
100 µg ) was allowed to react with 1 ml of the ABTS solution and the absorbance
was measured for various concentrations at 734 nm after 7 min. Triplicate
determinations were made and the percentage inhibition was calculated as,
Ethanol without tea extract was used as control.
2.4.4. Hydrogen peroxide scavenging activity
The ability of the extracts to scavenge hydrogen peroxide was determined
according to the method of Ruch et al. [14]. Shortly, hydrogen peroxide solution
(2mM/l) was prepared with 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). 1 ml each of various
concentrations (20-100 µg) of ethanol and water extracts of teas were allowed to
react with 0.6 ml of hydrogen peroxide solution. Absorbance was measured for
69
various concentrations at 230 nm after 10 min against a blank solution containing
phosphate buffer without hydrogen peroxide. The experiments were carried out in
triplicate.
where the control is ethanol instead of tea extract.
2.4.5. Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity
Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity was determined by following the
method of Halliwell and Gutteridge (15). 0.2 ml each of various concentrations (20-
100 µg) of tea extracts were added with 1.0 ml of EDTA (Ethylene diammine tetra
acetic acid) solution, (0.13 g of ferrous ammonium sulphate and 0.26 g of EDTA
were dissolved in 100 ml of water) and mixed with 1.0 ml of 0.85 % (v/v) DMSO in
0.1M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) to initiate the reaction followed by the addition of
0.5 ml of 0.22 % (w/v) ascorbic acid. The reaction mixture was kept in water bath at
90ºC for 15 min and the reaction was terminated by adding 1.0 ml of ice-cold 17.5 %
(w/v) of trichloroacetic acid. Further 3.0 ml of Nash reagent (75 g of ammonium
acetate, 3.0 ml of glacial acetic acid and 2.0 ml of acetyl acetone in 1.0 lit of
water) was added to all the test tubes and incubated for 15 min for colour
development. Absorbance was measured at 412 nm using a Perkin Elmer Lambda
35 UV-Visible Spectrophotometer. Reaction mixture without ascorbic acid served as
control. Triplicate determinations were made and the percentage inhibition was
calculated as,
70
2. 4.6. Polyphenol oxidase activity
Polyphenol oxidase activity was determined according to Molla method [16].
Shortly, 1 g of the powdered sample was ground with 10 ml of the prechilled 10 mM
citrate buffer (pH 5.6) and the mixture was centrifuged at maximum speed for 10
min, and the PPO activity was assayed with oxygen electrode (Model- Inolab oxi-
730). PPO enzyme activity was estimated by adding 2 ml of crude enzyme in the
reaction chamber containing 10 ml of 10 mM citrate buffer and 25 ml of 100 mM
pyrocatechol which was saturated for few min and the decrease in oxygen
concentration was observed at periodic intervals of 1 min up to 5 min using oxygen
electrode. 1 unit of enzyme activity is defined as µM of oxygen utilized per min per
g dry weight.
2. 4.7. Peroxidase enzyme activity.
POD enzyme activity was measured according to Takeo and Kato method
[17]. Briefly 1 g of the powdered tea sample was homogenized in 1 ml of prechilled
10 mM citrate buffer (pH 5.6) and the activity was assayed using oxygen electrode
(model- inolab oxi-730). POD activity was estimated by adding 1.4 ml of crude
enzyme in the reaction chamber containing 15 ml of 0.025 M phosphate buffer and
10 ml of 0.01 M pyrogallol which was saturated for few min and the increase in
oxygen concentration was observed by adding 7 ml of 300 mM hydrogen peroxide
up to 5 min at periodic intervals of one min. One unit of enzyme activity was defined
as µM of oxygen formed per min per g dry weight.
71
2.4.8. Superoxide dismutase activity
SOD activity was assayed according to the method of Marklund and
Marklund [18]. The reaction mixture was prepared with 0.2 ml of the ethanolic
extract, 2.6 ml of tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.5) and 0.2 ml of 7.2 mM pyrogallol
and was subsequently incubated at 25°C for 15 min. The reaction was stopped by
adding 0.1 ml of 1N HCl. The oxidized pyrogallol was measured at 420 nm using
UV-Visible spectrophotometer. The results were expressed as percentage of
inhibition.
2.5. Determination of heavy metals and minerals
2.5.1. Cleaning procedure for glasswares
The glassware and polyethylene containers used for analysis were washed
with tap water, then soaked overnight in 6N HNO3 solution and rinsed several times
with ultra pure water to eliminate absorbance due to detergent [19].
2.5.2. Extraction procedure for mineral nutrients
About 1.0 g of homogenized sample of tea extract was taken in 150 ml
conical flask to which 10 ml of 9:4 mixture of nitric acid and perchloric acid was
added and kept overnight for predigestion to avoid the danger of explosion with
perchloric acid [20] . The samples were digested on an electric hot plate in the
temperature range of 70-80ºC till the content become colourless. The digested
samples were transferred to 100 ml standard measuring flasks and made up with
distilled water and used as a stock solution.
72
2.5.3. Estimation of Fe, Zn, Mn and Mg
The wet digested extract from the stock solutions was directly fed into the
Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer AAS) and the readings were
taken using the respective hollow cathode lamps after preparing a standard curve by
feeding the certified standard solutions (make Merck; certified by NIST) for each
nutrient [21]. Operation parameters for the elements are given in Table 2.2.
Table 2.2. Operation parameters for determination of elements
Elements Wavelength (nm) Fuel gas Oxidant gas
Zn
213.9
Acetylene (2.0 ml/min)
Air (17 ml/min)
Fe
248.3
Acetylene (2.0 ml/min)
Air (17 ml/min)
Mn
280.1
Acetylene (2.0 ml/min)
Air (17 ml/min)
Ca
422.7
Acetylene (2.0 ml/min)
Air (17 ml/min)
As
193.7
Acetylene (2.2 ml/min)
Air (17 ml/min)
Hg
253.7
Acetylene (2.2 ml/min)
Air (17 ml/min)
Cr
357.9
Acetylene (2.2 ml/min)
Air (17 ml/min)
Cu
324.7
Acetylene (2.2 ml/min)
Air (17 ml/min)
Ni
232.0
Acetylene (2.2 ml/min)
Air (17 ml/min)
Pb
283.3
Inert gas-Argon
Mafrs’s recom.
Cd
228.8
Argon
Mafrs’s recom.
73
2.5.4. Estimation of phosphorus
5 ml of wet digested extract from stock solution was taken in a 25 ml
standard measuring flask, to which 10 ml of distilled water, 5 ml of freshly prepared
ascorbic acid and 4 ml of ammonium molybdate solutions were added. The contents
were diluted to 25 ml with distilled water, shaken well and allowed to stand for 30
min for completion of the reaction. Absorbance of the developed blue colour was
measured at 882 nm against the reagent blank solution using UV-Visible
Spectrophotometer [22]. The amount of phosphorus present in the sample was
calculated using the calibration curve of known concentrations of phosphorus and
the results were expressed in mg/kg.
2.5.5. Estimation of nitrogen
About 0.5-1g of ground tea sample was taken in a Kjeldahl tube and the
analysis was carried out using Kjeldahl method [7]. The principle involves the
conversion of all forms of nitrogen into ammonia form by digesting with 3.33%
salicylic acid in sulphuric acid at 450° C. Distillation was carried out in Gerhardt or
Kjeldahl instrument. The distillate was collected in a conical flask, which contains a
known quantity of 0.05 N hydrochloric acid. The excess hydrochloric acid was then
titrated against standard sodium hydroxide solution using digital burette III (Make,
GmbH). The result was expressed in mg/kg.
74
2.5.6. Estimation of potassium
The wet digested extract from the stock solution was directly fed into the
flame photometer and set the potassium filter. The potassium content was estimated
using direct reading of Flame Photometer [21].
2.5.7. Estimation of sodium
The digested sample was directly fed into the flame photometer and set the
sodium filter. The sodium content was estimated using direct reading of Flame
Photometer (Sherwood 410) [21].
2.5.8. Estimation of arsenic and mercury
In a pre-acid washed and cleaned dry beaker, 0.5 g of accurately weighed tea
sample and 5 ml of HNO3 were added and placed on a hot plate. The solution was
evaporated to near dryness and cooled. Additionally, 1 ml of HNO3 and 0.5 ml
H2SO4 were added. The above mixture was evaporated to dryness and 1.0-2.0 ml of
H2O2 was added drop wise and the mixture was heated to destroy the remaining
nitrogen oxides that might interfere in the measurement set up. The residue was
dissolved in 8 ml HCl and the volume was brought to 25 ml in calibrated flask using
double distilled water. Reagent blank was prepared containing same amounts of
acids taken from the lots evaporated as above. After sample preparation, the samples
were analyzed in AAS (Perkin Elmer AAS-Flame (AAnalyst 800) as per the
conditions given in Journal of AOAC international, 1996 [23].
2.5.9. Estimation of chromium
In a pre-acid washed and cleaned dry beaker, 1.0 g of accurately weighed tea
sample and 100 mL of HNO3-HCl acid mixture (3:1 v/v) were added and placed on a
75
hot plate. The solution was evaporated to near dryness and cooled. Additionally 50
ml of above acid mixture was added and evaporated to obtain clear solution. The
solution was transferred to 25 ml volumetric flask and diluted with double distilled
water. Reagents blank was prepared containing same amounts of acids taken from
lots evaporated as above. After sample preparation, the samples were analyzed in
AAS (Perkin Elmer AAS-Flame (AAnalyst 800)) as per conditions given in Bull
Environ.Contam.Toxicol. 2004 [24].
2.5.10. Estimation of copper and nickel
In a pre-acid washed, cleaned and dried 500 ml beaker, 3.0 g of accurately
weighed tea sample and 100 ml HNO3 were added and swirled. The reaction
mixture was covered, set aside for 10 min and then heated on a hot plate.
Then the mixture was evaporated to near dryness and cooled. Additionally, 50 ml
of HNO3 and 10 ml of KClO4 were added. The evaporation was continued to
obtain clear solution. The solution was transferred to 50 ml volumetric flaks and
diluted to the volume with water (Insoluble KClO4 settles down at the bottom).
Reagent blank was prepared containing same amounts of acids taken from lots
evaporated as above. After sample preparation, the samples were analyzed in AAS
(Perkin Elmer AAS-Flame (Analyst 800) as per conditions given in AOAC -999.11,
2005 [25].
2.5.11. Estimation of lead and cadmium
About 0.5 g of tea sample was placed in a pre-acid washed and cleaned dry
crucible, kept in a muffle furnace at 450˚C for 3 h. After cooling the crucible, 5 ml
of 6M HCl was added, ensuring that all ash comes into contact with acid. The acid
76
solution was evaporated using hot plate. The contents were dissolved using
0.1 M HNO3 and filtered into a 50 ml standard measuring flask. The crucible
was washed completely with care. Blanks were treated in the same way as that of
sample. After sample preparation, the samples were analyzed in AAS (Perkin
Elmer AAS-Flame (AAnalyst 800) as per the conditions given in AOAC - 999.11,
2005 [25].
The concentration, C of the metal (As, Hg, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, Cd, Zn and Mn) in
the test sample was calculated according to the formula,
where, C is the concentration of the metal (µg/ml), a is the concentration of test
sample (µg/ml), b is the concentration in the blank solution (µg/ml), W is the weight
of the sample taken and V is the volume of test solution (ml).
2.6. Antimicrobial activities
2.6.1. Preparation of extracts
The extraction of tea samples by solvents like water, ethanol and ethyl
acetate was carried out as described by Moon et al. [26]. In this method, 20 g of
black and green tea samples were extracted using soxhlet extractor with 250 ml
water, ethanol and ethyl acetate as solvents. The extraction lasted for 6 h for ethanol
and ethyl acetate and 8 h for water. The extract was concentrated to dryness by using
rotary vacuum evaporator to yield a dense residue and stored in bottles and
refrigerated at 4ºC prior to use.
77
2.6.2. Test organisms
Six bacterial species namely, Escherichia coli (MTCC 723), Vibrio cholerae
(MTCC 3906), Bacillus polymyxa (ATCC 842), Staphylococcus aureus (MTCC
3160), Bacillus subtilis (MTCC 736), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MTCC 7837) and
three fungal species namely, Aspergillus niger (MTCC 1881), Candida albicans
(MTCC 3958), Aspergillus flavus (MTCC 1883) were procured from culture
collection of S.D.M. Medical college, Sattur, Dharwad, Karnataka. The stock
cultures of bacteria were revived by inoculating in nutrient broth and grown at 37ºC
for 18 h, while the stock cultures of fungi were revived by inoculating in czapek-dox
agar media and grown at 27ºC for 48 h.
2.6.3. Preparation of medium for antibacterial and antifungal activity
The antibacterial activity was studied using nutrient broth medium, which
was prepared by mixing 10 g of peptone, 10 g of NaCl, 5 g of yeast extract and 20 g
of agar in 1000 ml of distilled water. The antifungal activity was determined using
czapek-dox agar medium which was prepared by mixing 30 g of sucrose, 2 g of
sodium nitrate, 1 g of K2HPO4, 0.5 g of MgSO4. 7H2O, 0.5 g of KCl, 0.01 g of
FeSO4 and 20 g of agar and the volume was made up to 1000 ml by distilled water.
2.6.4. Antibacterial and antifungal activity
The antibacterial and antifungal activities of the tea extracts were tested on
the test stains using the agar well diffusion method [27]. In this method, 18 h old
culture (100 µl, 10-4
CFU) of bacteria and 48 h old culture (100 µl, 10-4
CFU) of
fungi were introduced and evenly spread on the surface of sterile nutrient agar
medium plates and czapex-dox agar medium plates respectively. Six wells of about 5
78
mm diameter were aseptically cut on agar plates using a gel puncture. The wells
were filled with 100 µl of black and green tea extracts (10 mg/ml and 20 mg/ml).
The control well was filled with antibiotic gentamycin for bacteria and flucanazole
for fungi (100 µl from 10 mg/ml stock) and the respective solvents (100 µl) used for
extraction of samples were used as negative control. The plates were incubated at 37
ºC for 24 h for bacteria and 27 ºC for 48 h for fungal spores. Sensitivity was
recorded by measuring the clean zone of inhibition on the agar surface around the
disc. All experiments were carried out in triplicates.
2.7. Biosynthesis of nanoparticles from aqueous tea extracts
2.7.1. Preparation of the tea extract for the synthesis of silver nanoparticles
5 g of tea samples (black tea and green tea) was separately boiled in 100 ml
of double distilled water for 10 min and filtered through suction pump and Whatman
No.1 filter paper.
2.7.2. Preparation of the tea extract for the synthesis of gold nanoparticles
1 g of the tea samples (black and green tea) was separately boiled in 100 ml
of double distilled water for 10 min and filtered through Whatman No.1 filter paper.
2.7.3. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles
0.1M aqueous solution of silver nitrate was prepared in double distilled water
and used for the synthesis. For the synthesis of silver nanoparticles, various
concentrations of the black and green tea extracts (2, 5 and 7 ml) were taken, to
which added 2, 5 and 7 ml of distilled water followed by the addition of 1 ml of
0.1M silver nitrate. The solutions were then shaken well for thorough mixing to get
silver nanoparticles. Then, the solution was kept in freeze drying flask under the
79
vacuum below 100 Pascals at 50°C. Freeze drying (lyophilization) is a process
typically used to preserve perishable material.
2.7.4 Synthesis of gold nanoparticles
1 mM solution of chloro auric acid was prepared in double distilled water and
used for the synthesis. For the synthesis of gold nanoparticles, various
concentrations of the black and green tea extracts (0.2, 0.6, 1.2 ml) were added to 10
ml of 1 mM chloro auric acid and stirring was continued for 2 min to get gold
nanoparticles.
2.7.5. Characterization of silver and gold nanoparticles
2.7.5.1. UV-Visible spectral analysis
The colour change in reaction mixture (metal ion solution + tea extracts) was
recorded through visual observation. The reaction mixture was monitored as a
function of time using Elico-UV-Visible spectrophotometer (Model S3-159)
operated at a resolution of 1 nm in the range of 200-800 nm after 5 fold dilution of
sample with double distilled water. Distilled water was used as blank.
2.7.5.2. Fourier transform Infra-Red spectroscopy analysis
To remove any residue or compound that is not the capping ligand of the
nanoparticles, the residual solution of 100 ml, after reaction was centrifuged at 5000
rpm for 10 min and the resulting suspension was redispersed in 10 ml of double
distilled water. The centrifuging and redispersing processes were repeated three
times, thereafter the purified suspension was fire dried to obtain dried powder. FTIR
spectra of the samples were recorded using Bruker-Tensor 27 FTIR spectrometer in
80
attenuated total reflection mode (Pike technologies, Gladia ATR for FTIR with
diamond crystal) in the range of 4000-400 cm-1
.
2.7.5.3. Scanning electron microscope analysis
Thin films of samples were prepared by dropping a very small amount of the
solution containing nanoparticles on a carbon coated copper grid. Extra solution was
removed using a blotting paper and then allowed to dry prior to the measurements.
The SEM analysis was performed on a JEOL, model JSM-6390 instrument operated
at an accelerating voltage of 20 KeV and counting time of 100 s.
2.7.5.4. Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy
Energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis of the synthesized silver and gold
nanoparticles was performed on a JEOL JSM-6390 microscope fitted with Oxford-
EDX analyzer.
2.7.5.5. Transmission electron microscope analysis
The morphology of the synthesized silver and gold nanoparticles was
determined by Transmission electron microscopy (TEM). For TEM studies, the
solution containing nanoparticles was diluted and a drop of it was placed on copper
grid and allowed to dry in vacuum. The transmission electron micrographs of silver
nanoparticles were taken using Technai-G-10, an 80 KV TEM with a tungsten
source and an ultra high resolution pole piece. Similarly, the morphology of the gold
nanoparticles was studied using high resolution Technai F 20 TEM.
2.7.5.6. X-ray diffraction measurements
The silver and gold nanoparticle solutions obtained were purified by repeated
centrifugation at 5000 rpm for 20 min, followed by redispersion of the pellet of
81
silver and gold nanoparticles into 10 ml of double distilled water. After
freeze drying, the structure and composition of the purified nanoparticles were
determined by using X-ray diffactomoter, (Shimadzu model Lab-X-XRD-6000)
operated at a voltage of 40 kV and a current of 30 mA with Cu K α radiation with a
wavelength of 1.5406 A°. The diffracted intensities were recorded form 10° to 90°
of 2θ angles.
The crystallite domain size was calculated from the width of the XRD
peaks, assuming that they are free from non-uniform strains, using the Scherer
formula,
D= 0.94 λ / β cos θ ………………….. (1)
where, D is the average crystallite domain size perpendicular to the reflecting planes,
λ is the x-ray wavelength, β is the full width at half maximum (FWHM), and θ is the
diffraction angle. To eliminate additional instrumental broadening, the FWHM was
corrected using the FWHM from a large grained Si sample.
β corrected = (FWHM2
sample-------FWHM2
standard) 1/2
-------- (2)
This modified formula is valid only when the crystallite size is less than 100 nm
2.7.5.7. Particle size analysis
The particle size range of the silver nanoparticles along with its
polydispersity was determined using a particle size analyzer (Sympatec GMBH,
Nanophox particle size analyzer). Particle size was arrived based on measuring the
time dependent fluctuation of scattering of laser light by the nanoparticles
undergoing Brownian motion.
82
2.7.5.8. Thermo gravimetric Analysis
Thermogravimetric analysis of the powder of the biologically synthesized
silver nanoparticles was carried out using TGA Q500 V20.10 build 36 instrument at
heating rate of 10 C/min under nitrogen atmosphere.
2.7.5.9. Photoluminescence spectral analysis
Photoluminescent spectra of the synthesized silver and gold nanoparticles
were recorded using Flurolog III spectroflurophotometer.
2.7.5.10. Antibacterial activity of silver and gold nanoparticles
Silver and gold nanoparticles synthesized using aqueous extracts of black
and green teas were tested for their potent antibacterial activity against six
pathogenic bacteria as given in 2.6.2. The antibacterial activities of the gold and
silver nanoparticles were determined by agar well diffusion technique [27]. Nutrient
agar medium was prepared and poured into sterilized Petri plates and wells of 5 mm
diameter were made in the plate using gel puncture. The agar plates were inoculated
with 18 h old culture (100 µl, 10-4
CFU) and spread evenly on the plate. After 20
min, the wells were filled with 100 µl of silver and gold nanoparticles. The control
wells were filled with gentamycin (100 µl from 10mg/ml stock) and with 100 µl of
1mM AgNO3 or chloroauric acid. All the plates were incubated at 37ºC for 24 h and
the diameter of inhibition zones were noted. All experiments were carried out in
triplicate.
2.7.5.11. Antifungal activity of silver and gold nanoparticles
Silver and gold nanoparticles synthesized using aqueous extracts of black
and green teas were tested for their potent antifungal activity against two pathogenic
83
fungi as given in 2.6.2 by Agar well diffusion technique [27]. Czapek-Dox Agar
medium was prepared, media was poured into sterilized Petri plates and wells of 5
mm diameter were made in the plate using gel puncture. Each plate was inoculated
with 48 h old culture (100 µl 10-4
CFU) and spread evenly on the plate. After 20
min, the wells were filled with 100 µl of silver and gold nanoparticles. The control
wells were filled with flucanazole (100 µl from 10mg/ml stock) and with 100 µl of
1mM AgNO3 or chloroauric acid. All the plates were incubated at 270C for 48 h and
the diameter of inhibition zone were noted. All experiments were carried out in
triplicates.
2.8. Statistical analysis
All the experiments were carried out in triplicate. The results were expressed
as mean ± SD.
84
References
1 M. Chessbrough, Medical laboratory manual for tropical countries, Linacre
House, Jordan Hill, Oxford. pp.260 (2000).
2 ISO 14502-1:2005 (E) Determination of substances characteristics of green
and black tea. Part-I: Content of total polyphenols in tea- Colorimetric method
using Folin Ciocalteu’s reagent.
3 T. Swain and W.E. Hills, J. Sci. Food Agric. 10 (1959) 63-68.
4 J.E. Hedge and B.T. Hofreiter, Carbohydrate Chemistry. Academic press, New
York, USA. pp.17-22 (1962).
5 S.K. Ronald and S. Ronald, Beverages and chocolate. In Pearson’s
Composition and analysis of foods, 9th
ed., Longman scientific and Technical
Publishers, England, pp.356-362 (1991).
6 S.N.S. Thanraj and R. Seshadri, J. Sci. Food Agric. 51 (1990) 57-69.
7 J.P.E. Anderson, Soil respiration: in A.L. Page, R.H. Miller and D. Keeney,
editors, Agronomy monograph 9: Methods of soil analysis, Part 2. Chemical
and biological properties, second edition.American Society of Agronomy and
Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Winconsin, USA. pp.831-871
(1982).
8 R. Ravichandran and R. Parthiban, Food Chem. 68 (2000) 7-13.
9 IS. 13853: Indian Standard Procedure. 1994.
10 ISO 14502-2: 2005 Tea method for determination of substances characteristic
of green and black tea, Part-2. Content of catechins in green tea-method using
high performance liquid chromatography.
85
11 Q.Y. Zhu, R.M. Hackman, J.L. Ensunsa, R.R. Holt and C.L. Keen J. Agric.
Food Chem. 50 (2002) 6929-6934.
12 A. Yildrin, A. Mavi and A.A. Kara, J. Agric. Food Chem. 49 (2001) 4083-
4089.
13 R.Re, N. Pellegrini, A. Proteggente, A. Pannala, M. Yang and C. Rice Evans,
Free Radic. Biol. Med. 26 (1999) 1231-1237.
14 R.J. Ruch, S.J. Cheng and J.E. Klaunig, Carcinogenesis 10 (1989) 1003-1008.
15 B. Halliwell and J. Gutteridge, FEBS Lett. 128 (1981) 347-352.
16 M..M. Molla, Sri Lanka J. Tea Sci. 61 (1992) 15-19.
17 T. Takeo and Y. Kato, Plant Cell Physiol. 12 (1971) 217-223.
18 S. Marklund and G. Marklund, Eur. J. Biochem. 47 (1974) 468-474.
19 C. Cabrera, F.Lloris, R. Gimenez, M. Olalla and M.C. Lopez, Sci. Total
Environ. 308 (2003) 1-14.
20 B.A. Haunter, M.S. Johnson, and D.J Thompson. J. Appl. Ecol. 24 (1987) 573-
586.
21 B.S.Bhargava and H.B.Raghupathi, Analysis of plant materials for macro and
micronutrients. In: Methods of analysis of soils, plants, waters and
fertilizers.(Ed. Tandon, H. L. S.) Fertiliser Association and Consultation
Organization, New Delhi, pp. 49-82 (2001).
22 R.H. Bray, and L.T.Kurtz, Soil Sci. 59 (1945) 39-45.
23 O. Jimenez De Blas and N. Rodriguez-Mateos, J. AOAC Internat. 79 (1996)
764-768.
24 I. Narin, H. Colak, O. Turkoglu, M. Soylak and M. Dogan. Bull Environ.
Contam. Toxicol. 72 (2004) 844-849.
86
25 AOAC official methods of analysis 999.11. Metals and other contaminants.
Chapter 9, 18th
edition, pp.19-22 (2005).
26 H.P. Moon, W.K. Gyoung, H.K. Joung and J.S. You, Korean Chem. Soc. 26
(2005) 747-754.
27 C. Perez, M. Pauli and P. Bazerque, Acta Biol. Med. Exp. 15 (1990) 113-115.