charleston 2012: altmetrics: analyzing the value in scholarly content

25
Altmetrics: Analyzing the value in scholarly content William Gunn Head of Academic Outreach [email protected] @mrgunn

Upload: william-gunn

Post on 05-Dec-2014

94 views

Category:

Science


0 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Charleston 2012: Altmetrics: Analyzing the Value in Scholarly Content

Altmetrics: Analyzing the value in scholarly content

William Gunn Head of Academic Outreach [email protected]

@mrgunn

Page 2: Charleston 2012: Altmetrics: Analyzing the Value in Scholarly Content

Based in London & New York, Mendeley is researchers, graduates and software developers from...

...backed by co-founders and former executives of:

Supported by:

Page 3: Charleston 2012: Altmetrics: Analyzing the Value in Scholarly Content

...and aggregates research data in the cloud

Mendeley makes science more collaborative and transparent:

Mendeley extracts research data…

Collecting rich signals from domain experts.

Page 4: Charleston 2012: Altmetrics: Analyzing the Value in Scholarly Content

Instrumenting the Research Workflow

Search

Read Annotate Organize

Write

Import

Page 5: Charleston 2012: Altmetrics: Analyzing the Value in Scholarly Content

Rich user profile data

Page 6: Charleston 2012: Altmetrics: Analyzing the Value in Scholarly Content

300 million documents uploaded 2.0 million users

Cambridge Stanford University MIT Imperial College London University of Oxford Harvard University University of Michigan University College London University of California at Berkeley Columbia University

Page 7: Charleston 2012: Altmetrics: Analyzing the Value in Scholarly Content

Why are altmetrics important?

Get better data on what's working

Get it faster

Serve all the stakeholders in research

Page 8: Charleston 2012: Altmetrics: Analyzing the Value in Scholarly Content

Research is poor quality

Amgen: 47 of 53 “landmark” oncology publications could not be reproduced.

Bayer: 43 of 67 oncology & cardiovascular projects were based on contradictory results

Dr. John Ioannidis: 432 publications purporting sex differences in hypertension, multiple sclerosis, or lung cancer. Only one data set was reproducible.

Page 9: Charleston 2012: Altmetrics: Analyzing the Value in Scholarly Content

We didn’t see that a target is more likely to be validated if it was reported in ten publications or in two publications

NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY 10, 712 (SEPTEMBER 2011)

Page 10: Charleston 2012: Altmetrics: Analyzing the Value in Scholarly Content

https://secure.flickr.com/photos/fireflythegreat/2845637227/

Page 11: Charleston 2012: Altmetrics: Analyzing the Value in Scholarly Content

Journal Impact Factor

Number of citations

Citeable items = Impact Factor

Page 12: Charleston 2012: Altmetrics: Analyzing the Value in Scholarly Content

Problems with Impact Factor

Page 13: Charleston 2012: Altmetrics: Analyzing the Value in Scholarly Content

Problems with Impact Factor

Page 14: Charleston 2012: Altmetrics: Analyzing the Value in Scholarly Content

http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291

Problems with Impact Factor

“During discussions with Thomson Scientific over which article types the company deems as “citable,” it became clear that the process of determining a journal's impact factor is unscientific and arbitrary.”

Page 15: Charleston 2012: Altmetrics: Analyzing the Value in Scholarly Content

Research is too slow

Page 16: Charleston 2012: Altmetrics: Analyzing the Value in Scholarly Content

Google Analytics for research

Page 17: Charleston 2012: Altmetrics: Analyzing the Value in Scholarly Content

Google Analytics for research

Page 18: Charleston 2012: Altmetrics: Analyzing the Value in Scholarly Content

Google Analytics for research

Page 19: Charleston 2012: Altmetrics: Analyzing the Value in Scholarly Content

ReaderMeter.org Personalized Impact

Page 20: Charleston 2012: Altmetrics: Analyzing the Value in Scholarly Content

Personalized Impact

Page 21: Charleston 2012: Altmetrics: Analyzing the Value in Scholarly Content
Page 22: Charleston 2012: Altmetrics: Analyzing the Value in Scholarly Content
Page 23: Charleston 2012: Altmetrics: Analyzing the Value in Scholarly Content

We’re in this for the long haul

http://www.flickr.com/photos/robertjosiah/4519389115

Page 24: Charleston 2012: Altmetrics: Analyzing the Value in Scholarly Content

Join Mendeley for Librarians

This is a private librarian-only group for members to share presentations and documents. Send a message to [email protected] for an invitation.

Page 25: Charleston 2012: Altmetrics: Analyzing the Value in Scholarly Content