chicago
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Chicago](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082813/55c13faebb61ebbc478b464d/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
RUNNING HEAD: LITTLE SPACE, BIG SPACE... EVERYDAY URBANISM IN DUBAI1
Little Spaces, Big Spaces: Everyday Urbanism in Dubai
Name
Course
College
Tutor
Date
![Page 2: Chicago](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082813/55c13faebb61ebbc478b464d/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
LITTLE SPACE, BIG SPACE... EVERYDAY URBANISM IN DUBAI 2
The model of Dubai’s urbanism once presented a gleaming example of progressive
urbanization which has surpasses other urban centers in the Middle East. From immaculate
infrastructure to shopping malls and shining skyscrapers, Dubai stands out from the other cities
like Cairo and Damascus. This led to the birth of the phrase, The Dubai Model. However, during
the 2008 financial crisis, the weaknesses of the model were exposed as building sites became
empty and cranes ceased operating. Therefore, in his article, Yasser Elsheshtawy tries to offer a
different perspective to the Dubai Model.
His view is that, focusing on the extremes of Dubai is misguiding since it portrays the
city as a vision driven by its rulers with an aim of constructing spectacular buildings in order to
attract the worlds wealthy. It portrays Dubai as a money making enterprise. The author however
focuses on the everyday spaces which offer countering narratives to the above view. He explains
that after examining the marginal spaces, Dubai is pictured as a place of cosmopolitanism and
tolerance rather than a setting of excess and exploitation. The author argues that the city can be
seen through the two extremes, one involving magnificent works of architecture relying on
excess and the other showing exploitation, marginalization and alienation of its migrant
population which came to light when a Human Right’s Watchdog report exposed the degree of
poverty in which the construction workers live. The question that therefore comes up in the
author’s article is; is Dubai a bad idea?
The author bases his argument by interrogating the Dubai Model. In his research, he
examines the model prior and post the financial crisis.1 He looks into the effects of the crisis on
the city and the magnitude to which the feasibility of the model has been cast in uncertainty. The
1 Sassen, S. (2001) The Global City: London, New York, Tokyo. New Jersey: Princeton
University Press.
![Page 3: Chicago](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082813/55c13faebb61ebbc478b464d/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
LITTLE SPACE, BIG SPACE... EVERYDAY URBANISM IN DUBAI 3
author is guided by research and fieldwork he has conducted since the year 2001 which consists
of observation of the city’s development as well as mapping its invisible settings. He concludes
that by examining spaces of the everyday, ‘little spaces’ offer a more correct portrayal of the city
as opposed to the ‘big spaces’. By writing the article from the perspective of an architect, his
point of interest is the physical space of the city.
The author starts by explaining the Dubai Model and how the idea became popularized.
The model can be viewed as an adaptation of similar ideas witnessed in countries like China and
Singapore. He examines pre-crisis Dubai and the Post-crisis Dubai which he describes as the end
of a spectacle. This sheds light on how projects in Dubai stalled after the crisis as opposed to
their busy operations before the crisis. The author also analyzes the various spaces in the urban
model such as sites of encounter, sites of exclusion, sites of commerce and sites of worship.
One major strength of this article is that it portrays the flaws in the Dubai Model which
haws made the city experience mass exodus2. Projects which were announced on a daily basis
now have become much fewer, and therefore jobs have become an issue. Also, the findings are
based on research carried out since 2001 as well as findings by a Human Rights Watch group.
However, there is a weakness in that the author does not bring out the positive contributions of
the Dubai Model to the city and its inhabitants.
Yasser Elsheshtawy therefore is of the belief that ‘little spaces’ and ‘big spaces’ are what
define everyday urbanism. Urbanization should be geared towards infrastructure development
without compromising the living standards and social needs of the population. Sassen indicates
2 Sassen, S. (2001) The Global City: London, New York, Tokyo. New Jersey: Princeton
University Press.
![Page 4: Chicago](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082813/55c13faebb61ebbc478b464d/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
LITTLE SPACE, BIG SPACE... EVERYDAY URBANISM IN DUBAI 4
that the development of cities should be planned on both technical and social factors3. The locals
need to be engaged in re-evaluation of priorities regarding the development of urban centers.
3 Sassen, S. (2001) The Global City: London, New York, Tokyo. New Jersey: Princeton
University Press.
![Page 5: Chicago](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082813/55c13faebb61ebbc478b464d/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
LITTLE SPACE, BIG SPACE... EVERYDAY URBANISM IN DUBAI 5
References
1. Sassen, S. (2001) The Global City: London, New York, Tokyo. New Jersey: Princeton
University Press.