clara maría mollá muñoz. pfg_t31 17-july,2013. 1. introduction. sustainable architecture the...
TRANSCRIPT
1. Introduction.
• Sustainable architecture
The strategies are focused on energy efficiency. Reduce environmental negative impact of the industry.
1. Introduction.• Factors to be setting back the progress towards sustainability.
Lack of information. Financial crisis.
• Economic and ecological efficient product.
• History of LCA. First period: 1970-1990 Decades of conception.
Second period: 1990-2000 Decades of standardization. ISO 14040(2006): Principles and framework.
ISO 14011(2006): Requirements and guidelines.
ISO- “Environmental management” LCA. Widely diverging
approaches. Terminologies. Results.
• Philosophy Cradle to Cradle: Mimic the nature
• What is LCA?
• A technique to assess environmental impacts associated with all the stages of products life.
• Life cycle phases for buildings.
PRE- USE USE
• Raw Materials extraction.
• Processing and manufacturing.
• Transportation.
• Construction.
• Natural gas supply.
• Electricity supply.
• Improvement.
• Maintenance.
END OF LIFE
• Demolition.
• Transport.
• Disposal.
• Recycle.
• Re-use.
• Steps in a LCA.
Step 3.
Impact assessment.
• Four sub-steps:
• Category definition.• Classification.• Characterization.• Weighting.
2. Methodologies and comparing.
Cradle to Cradle.
Extraction raw materials
End of life
Use
Transport and construction
Disposal-Recycle-Re-use
Cradle to Cradle
Cradle to Grave
Pre - use
Manufacture
Cradle to Gate
Gate to Gate: Partial LCA that examines only one value-added process.
2. Methodologies and comparing. Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED).
Cambridge Engineering Selector (CES): LCA technique.
• Embodied energy.
• CO2 Footprint.
• Energy and water efficient.
• Indoor environmental quality.
• Environmental friendly.
• Sustainable sites.
2. Methodologies and comparing. LEED: evaluates the building altogether.
Cradle to Cradle: evaluates the materials individually.
• LEED & C2C: both are certification.
• Many parameters take into account are irrelevant for this assessment. Is focused in energy efficiency.
• Focused in LCA of the materials, but is a rigid approach to the LCA. “No waste, waste is food”
2. Methodologies and comparing.
• CES & C2C: is concern about the energy used during the manufacturing, re-use and recycling process.
• CES & LEED: evaluation of the impact of the resources used throughout the life of the buildings.
• CES is the most suited for our project.
Embodied energy and CO2 footprint parameters in each phase .
3. Examples of application. Methodology process:
To analyze the LCA of the construction materials.
Two examples: Standard House (SH) and Energy Efficient House (EEH).
Calculating the embodied energy and CO2 footprint of this materials in each phase of building construction.
Calculating the thermal transmittance of the building envelope in both examples and estimate the energy used in the use phase. Compare and evaluate the results of the assessment.
3. Examples of application. Omissions:
• Concrete foundation.• Furniture.(except bathroom)• Municipal services.
• Worker transportation and their CO2 footprint.• The maintenance.• External infrastructure.
EEH major strategies:
• Reduce the embodied energy and CO2 footprint.
•Lowering the life cycle energy consumption.
3. Examples of application.
Aerated concrete blocks
Bamboo
Ecological system window
Plastic tile
Thermic paint
3. Examples of application. Comparing results.
Estructural frameBrich laying
RoofCovering
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
TOTAL MASS FOR SH (Kg) TOTAL MASS FOR EEH (Kg)
Life Cycle Mass Assessment:
SH291,6 Tonnes
EEH126,9 Tonnes
EEH reduce approximately 55% of mass.
3. Examples of application. Comparing results. Life Cycle Energy Assessment: embodied energy.• Pre-use and end of life:
Pre-use End Of Life
-500,000
0
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
Embodied Energy (MJ) SH Embodied Energy (MJ) EHH
EEH reduce approximately 80% of embodied energy in the pre-use phase.
3. Examples of application. Comparing results. Life Cycle Energy Assessment: Pre-use Transport.
ENERGY (MJ) CO2 footprint (kg)0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
TRANSPORT FOR SH
TRANSPORT FOR EEH
EEH reduce approximately 90% in the energy consumption and CO2 footprint.
ENERGY (MJ)
CO2 footprint (kg)
TRANSPORT FOR SH
30.595,87 2.172,31
TRANSPORT FOR EEH
1.810,52 128,55
3. Examples of application. Comparing results. Life Cycle Energy Assessment:
• Use: thermal transmittance.
• Climatic zone: D3. Navalcarnero (Madrid).
• Façade: Umlimax =0,66 W/m2K
SH = 0,559 W/m2KEEH= 0,339 W/m2K
• Use: energy consumption.
• SH = 37,48 KWh/day
• EEH= 31,58 KWh/day
Use E
nerg
y (K
wh/da
y)
Therm
ic los
s (fa
cing)
(W)
Therm
ic los
s (ro
of) (
W)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
SH
EEH
• Roof:
Uclim = 0,38 W/m2K
SH = 0,378 W/m2KEEH= 0,271 W/m2K
3. Examples of application. Comparing results. Life Cycle Global Warming Potential Assessment:
Pre-use0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
CO2 footprint (Kg) SH CO2 footprint (Kg) EHH
End Of Life0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
CO2 footprint (Kg) SH
CO2 footprint (Kg) EHH
EEH reduce approximately 80%-90% of CO2 footprint in the pre-use and end of life phases.
4. Economical impact. Life Cycle Cost Assessment:
0 €
10,000 €
20,000 €
30,000 €
40,000 €
50,000 €
60,000 €
STANDARD HOUSE
ENERGY EF-FICIENT HOUSE
Comparing SH and EEH:
• The traditional materials are cheaper than sustainable materials.
• The EEH are more environmental friendly.
• EEH’s building envelope offers 35% reduction in energy consumption.
• Economize on the building execution of EEH.
5. Conclusions.
We must consider such a product may have relatively good acceptance on the competitive market.
The EEH has obtained a good balance relationship between ecological and economical efficiency.
Total embodied energy Total CO2 fooprint0
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
SH
EEH
There’s a difference of 18.000€ in the EEH over SH. But it shown to be an investment on long term.
5. Conclusions.
“Our goal is a delightfully diverse, safe, healthy and just world, with clean air, clean water, soil and power, economically, equitably, ecologically and elegantly enjoyed, period” William MC Donough.
The best architecture system ever invented The Nature.