coheur alain : mutualits socialistes de belgique coheur alain : mutualits socialistes de belgique...
DESCRIPTION
INTRODUCTION aim of cross-border experiments is to get all hospitals, practionars and insurers working together To allow European citizens to move around more easily Do the Euroregions have any real autonomy in the field of health ?TRANSCRIPT
Coheur Alain : Mutualités Socialistes de Belgique
Common Challenges for Health and Care
Facing the challenges : cross-border experiments
WORKSHOP
Guidelines for operational cross-border care, practical dimension
- introduction- the global level- the local level- conclusions
INTRODUCTION
aim of cross-border experiments is to get all hospitals, practionars and insurers working together
To allow European citizens to move around more easily
Do the Euroregions have any real autonomy in the field of health ?
THE GLOBAL LEVEL 1992, first community initiative = Interreg
General principle = the national borders should not be an obstacle to balanced development or to integration of the European territory
Three elements characterise and constitute the added value of the Interreg Initiative
Support for development Method of partnership Grassroots visibility
The most significant results and progress achieved as regards cross-border accessibility to health care have been under the Interreg programme
Our complementary projects have given rise to four results :
An easing in the administrative procedure Parternships Bilateral agreements exchanges
THE LOCAL LEVELChoosing the most relevant projects
for the insurers and for the hospitalsHighlight the gaps in the health cover, Highlight the needs of the populationHow to set up and implement the
actual possibilities for cross-border care ?
How can we ensure that health managers are able to cohabit ?
Do we need to set up official bodies ?
How the project is organized
Team health-care insu. pro ject
Subprojects Subprojects
Subprojects
Subprojects
Subprojects
C oordinators H ospita ls pro ject team
Executive Bureau
Steering C om m ittee
M onitoring C om m ittee
Decision making process relating to the Decision making process relating to the subprojectssubprojects
• • External "researchers"• •
(3) (3)• 10 10• Coordinators Member organizations Project teams• 4• 5 10 9• •
8• Executive Bureau 1 2• 6 11• 12 13• Steering Committee Monitoring Committee European Commission • 7• = project proposal = project (proposal) approved• = (sub)project completed
Selection criteriaSelection criteria• The award of the subprojects always takes place following a
check on their appropriateness in relation to the overall objectives of the project
• The projects selected are then classified according to priority
• The projects are choosen on the basis of very precise criteria• What specific know-how is necessary• Preference is always given to what meets the real needs of
the insured persons/patients
With figures by way of example Example of subproject grade
Subproject grade
high High low
1. Target group for large population group 4 0 1 2 3 4 small group 3 0 1 2 3 4
2. Necessity, in Region 1 1 0 1 2 3 4 in Region 2 2 0 1 2 3 4 in Region 3 3 0 1 2 3 4 in Region 4 4 0 1 2 3 4
3. Hospital care 2 0 1 2 3 4 Outpatient care 2 0 1 2 3 4 Combination of both 4 0 1 2 3 4 Health insurance 4 0 1 2 3 4
4. Limited provision in relation to needs 2 0 1 2 3 4
3. Favourable/adverse financial consequences for health-care, insurance bodies and patients
2 0 1 2 3 4
6. Distance in relation to patients/families 4 0 1 2 3 4
7. Skills (need for centres of excellence) 2 0 1 2 3 4
8. Involvement of the 4 regions 4-3-3-1 0 1 2 3 4
9. Project objective scientific approach 2 0 1 2 3 4 possibilities as regards practical application 4 0 1 2 3 4