coke india fiasco

35
Coke India Fiasco By Aviral, Anurag and Bishwash

Upload: bleakckout

Post on 30-Jun-2015

94 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Coke India Fiasco

Coke India Fiasco

ByAviral, Anurag and Bishwash

Page 2: Coke India Fiasco

Coca-Cola

• Created in 1886 by John Pemberton in Atlanta Georgia. He sold it as a potion for mental physical disorders.

• Asa D Candler added carbonated water in coke.

• Registered as a trade mark in 1887.

• In 1895, Coca-Cola was being sold in every state of United states.

Page 3: Coke India Fiasco

Coca-Cola

• First international bottling plants opened in Canada, Cuba and Panama in 1906.

• Reached 370 franchisees by 1910 in US.

• In 2003, 70% sales of coke was generated outside US. It has been no. 1 brand with value of $70.45 billion.

• Worked on the former CEO Robert Woodruff’s goal : To make Coke available wherever and whenever

consumers wanted it, “ in arms reach of desire”

Page 4: Coke India Fiasco

“It is a real thing” “Things go better with coke”

“Coke is it” “Cant beat the feeling”

Page 5: Coke India Fiasco
Page 6: Coke India Fiasco

Coke in India

• East India company brought Coke to India.

• Till 1977 it was leading soft drink in India, the company left when it was forced to reveal its formula.

• After 16 years it returned to India in 1993. Coke also acquired local bands like Limca, Citra, Mazaa, Gold spot and Thumbs-Up.

• International family of brand includes Sprite, Fanta, Diet Coke. It also launched Kinley water brand in 2001.

• Invested more than US$ 1 billion from 1993 to 2003.

Page 7: Coke India Fiasco

Indian beverage market

• Coke and Pepsi dominated the market with more 95% of market share.

• Pepsi entered the market in 1988 before Coke.

• Pepsi gave hard time to Coca-Cola, as it was targeting youth and had first mover’s advantage.

• When coke entered in 1993 and approached the market selling an American way of life which failed to resonate.

Page 8: Coke India Fiasco

Marketing Strategies• Used “Think local Act local” mantra because not a single global

strategy would be relevant everywhere.

• Two localization strategy for Indian market:

A: “Life ho to aisi” : Segment -metropolitan areas, message social bonding.

B: “Thanda matlab Coca-cola”: Segment- rural market, small towns, message coke is affordable.

Coke won advertiser of the year in 2003

Page 9: Coke India Fiasco
Page 10: Coke India Fiasco

Corporate Social Responsibility

• Has made efforts towards good citizenship by improving quality of life in which they operate addressing environment, waste management, water and climatic change.

• Other activities like: • In Africa combat spread of HIV through partnership with

government

• In India, company employed 7000 citizens, supported rain water harvesting projects, to promote education and health and more.

Page 11: Coke India Fiasco

Pesticide residue and Coca-Cola• Center for Science and Environment (CSE) issued a press release

on 12 major cold drinks to be containing deadly pesticides surpassing global standard by 30-36 times.

• Amongst them Coke was also one of them.

• Government banned coke and Pepsi products.

• Coke and Pepsi denial of the validity of CSE at the early stages.

• The issue spread in the media and students very fast affecting majority of customers and decreasing sales by 30-40% n two weeks.

Page 12: Coke India Fiasco
Page 13: Coke India Fiasco
Page 14: Coke India Fiasco
Page 15: Coke India Fiasco
Page 16: Coke India Fiasco
Page 17: Coke India Fiasco

Previous Coke Crisis

• Ingram, et al. v. The Coca-Cola Company- 1999

– The racial discrimination law-suit which was settled for $192.5 million

– $100 billion decrease in Coca-Cola’s stock price between 1998-2000

Page 18: Coke India Fiasco

Previous Coke Crisis

• Belgium- 1999

– afflicted to over 250 coke drinkers– seventeen million cases of Coke from five European

countries were recalled and destroyed– Belgian and French authorities banned the sale of

Coca-Cola products for ten days– Similar actions by other European nations against

Coke– Reported for the CO2 impurity and the fungicide

Page 19: Coke India Fiasco

Rebuilding the trust

• An aggressive PR campaign included vouchers and coupons for free product delivered to each of Belgium’s 4.4 million homes, sponsored dances, beach parties, and summer fairs for teenagers, and significant television advertising reinforcing “Today, more than ever, we thank you for your loyalty.”

Page 20: Coke India Fiasco

Kinley Bottled Water

• “Pure Water or Pure Peril?”

• Coca-Cola remained largely silent and the buzz went away

Page 21: Coke India Fiasco

Corporate Communications at Coca-Cola

• Critical function at the Coca-Cola corporation

• Matrix team organization

Page 22: Coke India Fiasco

NGO Activism

• Movement against business– Greenpeace’s attack on Shell Oil– Global Exchange’s attack on Nike for sweatshop

labor conditions

• Center for Science and Environment (CSE) against Coke in India

Page 23: Coke India Fiasco

Indian Regulatory Environment

• The Food Processing Order (1955) required that the main ingredient used in soft drinks be “potable water”

• EU food laws need to be imported into India to satisfy safety standards

Page 24: Coke India Fiasco

Thanks to CSE

• Aamir and Shahrukh came together - a rare show of solidarity at a joint press conference

• Coca-Cola and Pepsi launched independent campaigns

• Consumers still listened to CSE – sales dropped

Page 25: Coke India Fiasco

Mr.Gupta vs. Mr.Gupta

• Coke was working within the country’s legal guidelines

• Had not been reported much about product quality outside of India

• Short attention span of Indians on any issues

• An opportunity to display higher standards of social responsibility

Page 26: Coke India Fiasco

The situation

• There had been plenty of cases where multinationals discriminated the standards in developing countries in comparison to developed nations

• An effective solution was urgently required to resolve and continue the Coke momentum

Page 27: Coke India Fiasco

What we heard

• CSE touted:

– “12 major cold drink brands sold in and around Delhi contain a deadly cocktail of pesticide residues”

– How can apparently quality-conscious multinationals market products unfit for human consumption?

Page 28: Coke India Fiasco

What we read

• Coke’s net income was $3969 millions in 2002

• Coke was No.1 in Inter brand’s Global Brand Scoreboard 2003

• Coke claimed to do 441 tests for its product• In India, 10000 million bottles of soft drinks sold in

2003

Page 29: Coke India Fiasco

Coca-Cola: Principles of Corporate Citizenship

• Coca-Cola’s reputation is built on trust. • “The Coca-Cola Company exists to benefit and refresh everyone it

touches.” • Committed to managing business around the world with a

consistent set of values that represent the highest standards of integrity and excellence.

• These values are shared with bottlers, making the system stronger

• These core values are essential to Coca-Cola’s long-term business success and will be reflected in all relationships and actions - in the marketplace, the workplace, the environment and the community.

Page 30: Coke India Fiasco

Principles of Corporate Citizenship (contd..)

Marketplace • Adheres to the highest ethical standards• We will serve the people who enjoy our brands through innovation, superb

customer service, and respect for the unique customs and cultures in the communities where we do business.

Workplace • Treat each other with dignity, fairness and respect.• Foster an inclusive environment that encourages all employees to develop

and perform to their fullest potential, The Coca-Cola workplace ill be a place where everyone's ideas and contributions are valued, and where responsibility and accountability are encouraged and rewarded.

Environment • Integrate principles of environmental stewardship and sustainable

development into our business decisions and processes.

Page 31: Coke India Fiasco

Principles of Corporate Citizenship (contd..)

Community • We will contribute our time, expertise and resources to help

develop sustainable • communities in partnership with local leaders. We will seek

to improve the quality of life through locally-relevant initiatives wherever we do business.

Responsible corporate citizenship is at the heart of The

Coca-Cola Promise. We believe that what is best for our employees, for the community and for the environment is also best for our business.

Page 32: Coke India Fiasco

Myths and Facts about Coca-Cola

• Since August 5, 2003 the quality and safety of Coca-Cola and PepsiCo products in India

was called into question by a local NGO, the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE).

• The basis of the allegations are tests conducted on products of Coca-Cola and PepsiCo by CSE’s internal unaccredited laboratory, the Pollution Monitoring Laboratory.

Page 33: Coke India Fiasco

Myth versus facts: Coca- Cola (India)Myth Facts

•Coca-Cola products in India contain pesticide residues that are above EU norms

•There is stringent quality monitoring covering both the source water as well as finished product. •Tests for traces of pesticide in groundwater to the level of parts per billion. Even at these stringent miniscule levels Coca-cola co., India is well within the internationally accepted safety norms.

•Coca-Cola products sold in India are "toxic" and unfit for human consumption

•There is no contamination or toxicity in Coca-cola’s beverage brands. High-quality beverages are and have always been - safe and refreshing.

•Coca-Cola has dual standards in the production of its products, one high standard for western countries, another for India

•The soft drinks manufactured in India conform to the same high standards of quality as in the USA and Europe. Coca-Cola stringently tests soft drinks in India at independent, accredited and world-class laboratories.

Page 34: Coke India Fiasco

Myths Versus facts; Coca-Cola (India)Myths Facts

In India the soft drinks industry is virtually unregulated.

There are no standards for soft drinks in the US, the EU, or India. The water used by Coca- Cola conforms to both BIS and EU standards

Coca-Cola has put out results for Kinley water only and not for their soft drinks.

The results of product tests conducted by TNO Nutrition and Food Research Laboratory in the Netherlands is conclusive and is available on The Science Behind Coca-Cola’s Quality web page.

International companies like Coca-Cola are “colonizing” India

The Coca-Cola business in India is a local business. Beverages in India are produced locally, thousands of Indian citizens are employed, product range and marketing reflect Indian tastes and lifestyles, and we are deeply involved in the life of the local communities.

Farmers in India are using Coca-Cola and other soft drinks as pesticides by spraying them on their crops.

Soft drinks do not act in a similar way to pesticides when applied to the ground or crops. The use of soft drinks for this purpose would be totally ineffective.

Page 35: Coke India Fiasco