cola wars continue
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Cola wars continue](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082309/54580d88af795963388b6f08/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Cola Wars Continue
Coke & Pepsi in 2006
![Page 2: Cola wars continue](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082309/54580d88af795963388b6f08/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Abhishek Rahman Md. Estanul Kabir C. M. Sadat Ullah Abdullah Al Jubayer Amitabh Roy
Group Members
![Page 3: Cola wars continue](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082309/54580d88af795963388b6f08/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
• Coca-Cola was formulated in 1886 by pharmacist John Pemperton who sold the product at drug stores as “potion for mental and physical disorders.”
• In 1891, Asa Candler acquired the formula, established a sales force and began brand advertising of Coca-Cola.
• In 1919, went public under control of Robert Woodruff expanded and developed in national and international markets
• Successful during WWII with the high CSD consumption from the U.S soldiers
How do you Open Happiness?
![Page 4: Cola wars continue](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082309/54580d88af795963388b6f08/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
• Pepsi was created in 1893 in North Carolina by Pharmacist Caleb Bradham.
• By 1910 Pepsi had built a network of 270 bottlers.
• Pepsi struggled and declared bankruptcy twice
• During Great Depression grew in popularity due to price decrease to a nickel.
• In 1938, Coke sued Pepsi-Cola brand for infringement on Coca-Cola’s trademark.
Who made the Generation Next?
![Page 5: Cola wars continue](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082309/54580d88af795963388b6f08/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
So called cold wars were fought over $66 billion in *CSD industry in the USA
Both achieved average annual growth of 10% within1975 ~ Mid 90’s◦ Continues growth in the USA and worldwide
However, the war started more then a centaury ago
At the late 90’s◦ US per capita went down slightly◦ Their relationship began fray◦ Avg consumption of 52 gallons by the US people
Prelude
*CSD: Carbonated Soft Drinks
![Page 6: Cola wars continue](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082309/54580d88af795963388b6f08/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
At the late 90’s◦ Both experienced ups and downs on
Coke started facing operational difficulties Pepsi became more aggressive and launched new
alternatives◦ & both started working on
Developing Brand Strategies Pricing & Bottling
Prelude
![Page 7: Cola wars continue](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082309/54580d88af795963388b6f08/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Consumption grew by an avg. of 3% annually In 1970, avg. consumption was 23 gallons Went up because of
◦ Availability of CSD◦ Introduction of diet & ◦ Flavored items
Alternatives & status of CSD◦ Beer, Milk, Coffee, Bottled water, juices, tea, powdered drinks,
wine, sports drinks, distilled spirits & tap water◦ Yet, Americans drank soda than any other beverage◦ Cola maintained its dominance although its market share ◦ Dropped from 71% in 1990 to 60% in 2004
The U.S. CSD Industry
![Page 8: Cola wars continue](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082309/54580d88af795963388b6f08/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Involved 4 major participants◦ Concentrate Producers◦ Bottlers◦ Retail Channels◦ Suppliers
Production & distribution of CSD
![Page 9: Cola wars continue](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082309/54580d88af795963388b6f08/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Concentrate Producers
◦ Blend raw material ingredients◦ Packaged the mixture in plastic canisters &◦ Shipped the containers to the bottlers
Concentrate makers often added artificial sweetener with regular CSDs
Bottlers added sugar or high fructose corn syrup themselves
Production & distribution of CSD
![Page 10: Cola wars continue](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082309/54580d88af795963388b6f08/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Concentrate manufacturing◦ Involves capital investment in Machinery & overhead◦ Cost about $ 25 million to $50 million
Good enough to serve the entire United States
Most significant cost involves◦ Advertising, Promotion, Market Research and bottler support◦ Innovative & sophisticated campaigns◦ Spend on joint marketing programs with bottlers
Also look after◦ Customer development agreement◦ Supporting the bottlers in Sales efforts, setting standards & suggesting
operational improvements◦ Negotiate with the bottlers’ supplier for reliable supply, fast delivery and
lower price Sweetener & packaging makers
Production & distribution of CSD
![Page 11: Cola wars continue](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082309/54580d88af795963388b6f08/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Coca cola and Pepsi Cola combined 74.8% of the US CSD market sales volume in 2004 followed by Cadbury and Cott Corporation
Production & distribution of CSD
![Page 12: Cola wars continue](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082309/54580d88af795963388b6f08/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Bottlers◦ Purchased concentrate, add Carbonated water
and high fructose corn syrup ( in bottled or canned)
◦ Deliver to the customer accounts◦ Responsible for
Direct Store Door Secure shelf space Staking CSD products Positioning the brands trademark label Setting POS & ensure in store displays
Production & distribution of CSD
![Page 13: Cola wars continue](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082309/54580d88af795963388b6f08/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Bottlers process was capital intensive◦ High speed production line◦ Cost $4 million to $10 million each
Invest in trucks and distribution network◦ Cost allocation
Packaging involved 40% cost Cost of sales 45% Sweeteners 5 to 10% Concentrate 5%
◦ Gross profit routinely exceeded 40%◦ Operating margin within 7% to 9%
Production & distribution of CSD
![Page 14: Cola wars continue](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082309/54580d88af795963388b6f08/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Retail Channel◦ Pepsi had focused on sales through retail outlets◦ Coke had dominated fountain sales
Restaurants, Cafeterias and other outlets using fountain type dispensers
◦ At the 80’s Pepsi entered into the restaurants by acquiring Pizza
Hut, Taco Bell, KFC Coca Cola took the same route targeting the
competitors - Burger King, Wendy’s & Burger, McDonadls, Subway
Production & distribution of CSD
![Page 15: Cola wars continue](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082309/54580d88af795963388b6f08/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Sales through Retail ChannelProduction & distribution of CSD
32.90%
23.40%
14.50%
11.80%
7.90%
9.50%
Supermarkets Fountain OutletsVending MachinesMass MerchandisersConvenience stores and Gas StationsOther Outlets
![Page 16: Cola wars continue](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082309/54580d88af795963388b6f08/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Suppliers to Concentrate producers & Bottlers
Production & distribution of CSD
56%42%
2%
Metal CansPlastic bottleGlass bottle
![Page 17: Cola wars continue](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082309/54580d88af795963388b6f08/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Growth of Pepsi at starting of 1950 and onwards
“Beat Coke” motto of Pepsi Pepsi improves distribution channel
and sales through supermarket Convenient SKUs size of Pepsi picks
up consumption Marketing Campaign named “Pepsi
Generation” for young and teenagers
Cola wars initiate…
![Page 18: Cola wars continue](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082309/54580d88af795963388b6f08/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Pepsi sells concentrate to its bottlers @ 20% lower cost of Coke
Pepsi take initiatives to modernize the Bottlers plant and store delivery service
Coke remain unchanged with 800 independent bottlers
After modernizing the bottlers of Pepsi, increase the rate of concentrate equal to coke rate by promising to take part in advertising and marketing campaign
Bottler Up gradation in 1963
![Page 19: Cola wars continue](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082309/54580d88af795963388b6f08/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Coke experiment with new cola and non cola flavors, that includesCoke- Fanta in 1960- Sprite in (1961)- Tab in 1963, low calorie colaPepsi- Teem in 1960- Mountain Dew in 1964- Diet Pepsi in 1964
Both introduced nonrefundable bottle and convenient bottle size
Product Diversification in 1960 to 1965
![Page 20: Cola wars continue](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082309/54580d88af795963388b6f08/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Coke purchased - Minute Maid : fruit juice- Duncan Foods: Coffee, Tea, chocolate etc
Pepsi merged with - Frito-Lay: snack food to form PepsiCo
Bothe diversify their business to reach same target customer, use delivery system and same marketing orientation
Coke take initiatives to expand in overseas market and become aggressive in late 1970
Product Diversification non CSD industry
![Page 21: Cola wars continue](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082309/54580d88af795963388b6f08/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Year 1966 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2004E0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Consumption Comparison
CokePepsi
![Page 22: Cola wars continue](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082309/54580d88af795963388b6f08/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Coke advertising message◦ “American’s preferred Taste” in 1955 and ◦ “No Wonder Coke refreshes Best” in 1960
Pepsi’s Market Survey and demonstration that Consumer Preferred Pepsi to Coke
Coke Counter part- discounting on price
Pepsi passed Coke in food store sales for first time in 1979
Recognizing Competitors
![Page 23: Cola wars continue](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082309/54580d88af795963388b6f08/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Coke switched from using sugar to high-fructose corn syrup, lower price concentration
Doubling advertising cost in 1981 to 1984 by Coke and Pepsi.
in 1982 ◦ Coke sold off Non-CSD business and introduced Diet
Coke◦ became most successful beverage in Eighties
War Heats UP….
![Page 24: Cola wars continue](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082309/54580d88af795963388b6f08/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
In between 1983 to 1987 ◦ Coke again introduced 11 new products and ◦ Pepsi introduced 13
Coke- Caffeine free coke, Cherry Coke etc
Pepsi- Lemon lime slice, caffeine free Pepsi cola
Both introduced new packaging, bottle size and shape. Discounting from both parties grew the customer
Cadbury Schweppes become third largest concentrate producer and became threat to the two giants
War Heats UP….
![Page 25: Cola wars continue](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082309/54580d88af795963388b6f08/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Both Coke and Pepsi is busy to manage Bottlers
Coke started to buy poorly managed Bottlers and sell those to better performing bottlers
Coke bought two big bottlers in 1985 and owned one third coke’s volume in company owned operations and created Coca-Cola Enterprise (CCE)
Pepsi acquired few bottlers and open subsidiary by name of Pepsi Bottling Group.
Bottler Consolidation and weak cola war
![Page 26: Cola wars continue](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082309/54580d88af795963388b6f08/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
CCE raised $1 billion from capital market through offering 51% its shares to public
Improved operational excellence through◦ Increasing territories size◦ Organizing purchasing arrangements◦ Downsizing its works force by 20%
Coke became as an investment bank specialized in bottler deals
Bottler Consolidation and weak cola war
![Page 27: Cola wars continue](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082309/54580d88af795963388b6f08/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
New challenges faced by the CSD Industry from 90’s onwards◦ Core product demand was leveling down◦ Sales volume grew at a meager rate of 1% or less
between 1998 to 2004 in contrast to 3% to 7% during the 1980’s and early 1990’s
◦ Global CSD demand remained flat increasing only 0.26 billion during 1999 and 2003
Adapting to the Times
![Page 28: Cola wars continue](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082309/54580d88af795963388b6f08/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Challenges related to performance and execution were addressed by◦ providing alternatives beverages to the health
conscious consumers◦ Adjusting key strategic relationships◦ Cultivating international markets
Adapting to the Times
![Page 29: Cola wars continue](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082309/54580d88af795963388b6f08/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Coke’s downfall vs Pepsi’s uprise Coke
Unsuccessful execution of several initiatives◦ Failed joint ventures with
P&G and Quaker Oats (the latter was later purchased by PEPSI)
Disagreement among internal top management and radical shifts in company policies◦
Pepsi• “Grow the core and add
some more” – Pepsi CEO– Diversified portfolio of
Products – Launch of new CSDs like
Sierra Mist and Mountain Dew and expanding into other beverage categories like Getorade
– Volume growth by 3% in 2004• Proactive to consumer
demand – Pepsi distributed its
focus to DIET PEPSI to cater the increasing popularity of alternative beverages
![Page 30: Cola wars continue](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082309/54580d88af795963388b6f08/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Share of total CSD volume grew from 24.6% to 29.1% during 1997 to 2004 ◦ Primarily due to the gaining popularity of the
diet/alternative beverages◦ New products such as Coca-Cola Zero, Pepsi One
and Sierra Mist Free became popular among young fitness conscious individuals especially men
In 2004 the US market experienced:◦ 1% growth in CSD volume◦ 7.6% growth in Non-Carb volume◦ 18.8% leap in single-serve bottled-water volume
A shift in TrendPeople saying cola was “too fattening”
increased from48% to 59%
![Page 31: Cola wars continue](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082309/54580d88af795963388b6f08/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
• In 2004, Non-carb/alternative drinks grew at twice the rate of other food and beverage items
Pepsi was more aggressive than Coke in adapting to this shift in trend ◦ Pepsi developed a portfolio of Non-CSD products that
outsold Cokes’s rival product in each category Getorade (Pepsi) led PowerAde (Coke) by 80.4% to 18.1% Tropicana (Pepsi) lead Minute Maid (Coke) by 26.8% to 14.8%
◦ In the overall non-carb market Pepsi had a market share of 47.3% with Coke’s share of 27%
A shift in TrendEra of the Non-Carb Drinks
![Page 32: Cola wars continue](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082309/54580d88af795963388b6f08/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
After losing out on market share in the CSD category both Coke and Pepsi fared back in the $11.4 billion bottled water category
Primarily it was their distribution prowess that gave them a competitive advantage over the other companies selling Spring water.
By 2004:◦ Aquafina (Pepsico) led the market share with 13.6%
over Dasani (Coke) holding 12.1% ◦ The market leader was however Nestle waters with
42.1% market share
Winning shares Crystal Clear
![Page 33: Cola wars continue](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082309/54580d88af795963388b6f08/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Relationship with the bottlers has been critical to Pepsi’s success over Coke
Coke raised its concentrate prices leaving the bottlers a narrower profit margin in the highly price sensitive industry
Pepsi’s higher-margin-channels (especially the convenience and gas channel) gave its bottlers wider profit margins as these were high consumption venues. The increasingly 20oz PET bottle yielded margins as high as 35%, compared with the 5% and 7% margins on cans!
Bottlers UP!
![Page 34: Cola wars continue](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082309/54580d88af795963388b6f08/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
THANK YOU