comm in ication

Upload: frich-delos-santos-pena

Post on 04-Apr-2018

226 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    1/103

    COMMUNICATION

    The process of sending and receivingsymbols with meanings attached.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    2/103

    COMMUNICATION

    1. Effective communication occurs when theintended meaning of the sender and the

    interpreted meaning of the receiver are one and

    the same.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    3/103

    COMMUNICATION

    1. Effective communication occurs when theintended meaning of the sender and the

    interpreted meaning of the receiver are one and

    the same.

    2. Efficient communication occurs at minimum costin terms of resources (particularly time) expended.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    4/103

    COMMUNICATION

    1. Effective communication occurs when theintended meaning of the sender and the

    interpreted meaning of the receiver are one and

    the same.

    2. Efficient communication occurs at minimum costin terms of resources (particularly time) expended.

    3. Efficient communications are not always effective.Potential trade-offs between effectiveness andefficiency must be recognized in communication.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    5/103

    IMPROVING COMMUNICATION

    ACTIVE LISTENING: the process of taking action to helpthe source of a message say exactly what he or shereally means.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    6/103

    IMPROVING COMMUNICATION

    ACTIVE LISTENING: the process of taking action to helpthe source of a message say exactly what he or shereally means.

    Five Rules:

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    7/103

    IMPROVING COMMUNICATION

    ACTIVE LISTENING: the process of taking action to helpthe source of a message say exactly what he or shereally means.

    Five Rules:

    1. Listen for message content

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    8/103

    IMPROVING COMMUNICATION

    ACTIVE LISTENING: the process of taking action to helpthe source of a message say exactly what he or shereally means.

    Five Rules:

    1. Listen for message content

    2. Listen for feelings

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    9/103

    IMPROVING COMMUNICATION

    ACTIVE LISTENING: the process of taking action to helpthe source of a message say exactly what he or shereally means.

    Five Rules:

    1. Listen for message content

    2. Listen for feelings

    3. Respond to feelings

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    10/103

    IMPROVING COMMUNICATION

    ACTIVE LISTENING: the process of taking action to helpthe source of a message say exactly what he or shereally means.

    Five Rules:

    1. Listen for message content

    2. Listen for feelings

    3. Respond to feelings4. Note all cues

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    11/103

    IMPROVING COMMUNICATION

    ACTIVE LISTENING: the process of taking action to helpthe source of a message say exactly what he or shereally means.

    Five Rules:

    1. Listen for message content

    2. Listen for feelings

    3. Respond to feelings4. Note all cues

    5. Paraphrase and restate

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    12/103

    FEEDBACK

    The process of telling others howyou feel about something they did

    or said, or about the situation ingeneral.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    13/103

    FEEDBACK

    When poorly done, feedback can bethreatening to the recipient and cause

    resentment.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    14/103

    FEEDBACK

    When poorly done, feedback can bethreatening to the recipient and cause

    resentment.

    When properly done, feedback can be

    listened to, accepted, and used to goodadvantage by the receiver.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    15/103

    CONSTRUCTIVE FEEDBACK GUIDELINES

    1. Give feedback directly and with realfeeling, based on trust.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    16/103

    CONSTRUCTIVE FEEDBACK GUIDELINES

    1. Give feedback directly and with real feeling, based ontrust.

    2. Make feedback specific rather thangeneral; using good, clear, and recentexamples.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    17/103

    CONSTRUCTIVE FEEDBACK GUIDELINES

    1. Give feedback directly and with real feeling, based ontrust.

    2. Make feedback specific rather than general; using good,

    clear, and recent examples.

    3. Give feedback when receiver seems mostwilling or able to accept it.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    18/103

    CONSTRUCTIVE FEEDBACK GUIDELINES

    1. Give feedback directly and with real feeling, based ontrust.

    2. Make feedback specific rather than general; using good,

    clear, and recent examples.3. Give feedback when receiver seems most willing or able

    to accept it.

    4. Make sure it is valid and limited to thingsthe receiver can do something about.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    19/103

    CONSTRUCTIVE FEEDBACK GUIDELINES

    1. Give feedback directly and with real feeling, based ontrust.

    2. Make feedback specific rather than general; using good,clear, and recent examples.

    3. Give feedback when receiver seems most willing or ableto accept it.

    4. Make sure it is valid and limited to things the receiver cando something about.

    5. Give feedback in small doses; nevermore than the receiver can handle at onetime.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    20/103

    CONSTRUCTIVE FEEDBACK GUIDELINES

    1. Give feedback directly and with real feeling,based on trust.

    2. Make feedback specific rather than general;

    using good, clear, and recent examples.

    3. Give feedback when receiver seems mostwilling or able to accept it.

    4. Make sure it is valid and limited to things the

    receiver can do something about.

    5. Give feedback in small doses; never more thanthe receiver can handle at one time.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    21/103

    PERSUASION AND CREDIBILITY IN COMMUNICATION

    1. Communication is not always aboutsharing information; sometimes it isabout influencing another person in a

    desired way.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    22/103

    PERSUASION AND CREDIBILITY IN COMMUNICATION

    1. Communication is not always aboutsharing information; sometimes it isabout influencing another person in a

    desired way.

    2. Persuasion is getting someone else

    to support the message beingpresented.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    23/103

    PERSUASION AND CREDIBILITY IN COMMUNICATION

    1. Communication is not always about sharinginformation; sometimes it is about influencinganother person in a desired way.

    2. Persuasion is getting someone else to supportthe message being presented.

    3. Persuasion occurs very frequently inhorizontal structures and within the context ofempowerment.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    24/103

    PERSUASION AND CREDIBILITY IN COMMUNICATION

    4. The personal power bases of expertise andreference are essential for persuasion.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    25/103

    PERSUASION AND CREDIBILITY IN COMMUNICATION

    4. The personal power bases of expertise andreference are essential for persuasion.

    5. Taking bold stands or arguing aggressively

    often leads to counter persuasion becausethe persons credibility trust, respect, andintegrity in the eyes of others is destroyed.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    26/103

    Ways of building credibility:

    a.Building credibility through expertise requiresknowledge about the issue in question and/or a

    successful prior track record at dealing with similar

    issues.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    27/103

    Ways of building credibility:

    a.Building credibility through expertise requiresknowledge about the issue in question and/or a

    successful prior track record at dealing with similar

    issues.

    b.Building credibility through relationshipsrequires having a good working relationship with

    the person to be persuaded.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    28/103

    BARRIERS TO EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

    Noise anything that interferes withcommunication effectiveness.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    29/103

    BARRIERS TO EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

    Noise anything that interferes with communicationeffectiveness.

    1. Poor choice of channel

    The medium through which the message issent.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    30/103

    BARRIERS TO EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

    Noise anything that interferes with communicationeffectiveness.

    1. Poor choice of channel

    The medium through which the message is sent.2. Poor written or oral expression

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    31/103

    BARRIERS TO EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

    Noise anything that interferes with communicationeffectiveness.

    1. Poor choice of channel

    The medium through which the message is sent.2. Poor written or oral expression

    3. Failure to recognize non-verbal signals

    Gestures, body language, mixed message

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    32/103

    BARRIERS TO EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

    Noise anything that interferes with communicationeffectiveness.

    1. Poor choice of channel

    The medium through which the message is sent.2. Poor written or oral expression

    3. Failure to recognize non-verbal signals

    Gestures, body language, mixed message

    4. Physical distraction

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    33/103

    BARRIERS TO EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

    Noise anything that interferes with communicationeffectiveness.

    1. Poor choice of channel

    The medium through which the message is sent.2. Poor written or oral expression

    3. Failure to recognize non-verbal signals

    Gestures, body language, mixed message

    4. Physical distraction

    5. Status Effects

    Filterting the intentional distortion of

    information to make it favorable to the

    recipient.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    34/103

    CHANNEL RICHNESS AND USE OF

    COMMUNICATION MEDIA

    Low High

    RichnessRichness

    Richness of Communication

    - Impersonal -Personal

    - One-way - Two-way

    - Fast - Slow

    PostingsE-bulletins

    Memos,

    lettersE-mail

    Voice mail

    Tele.,

    emtg

    s

    Face-to-

    face mtgs

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    35/103

    STEPS TO KEEP COMMUNICATION CHANNELS

    OPEN

    1. Management by walking around(MBWA)

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    36/103

    STEPS TO KEEP COMMUNICATION CHANNELS

    OPEN

    1. Management by walking around(MBWA)

    2. Proxemics and Space Design

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    37/103

    STEPS TO KEEP COMMUNICATION CHANNELS

    OPEN

    1. Management by walking around(MBWA)

    2. Proxemics and Space Design

    3. Technology Utilization

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    38/103

    STEPS TO KEEP COMMUNICATION CHANNELS

    OPEN

    1. Management by walking around(MBWA)

    2. Proxemics and Space Design

    3. Technology Utilization

    4. Valuing Culture and Diversity

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    39/103

    PERCEPTIONThe process through which people receive, organize,and interpret information from the environment.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    40/103

    PERCEPTIONThe process through which people receive, organize,and interpret information from the environment.

    Attribution the process of developingexplanations for events.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    41/103

    PERCEPTIONThe process through which people receive, organize,and interpret information from the environment.

    Attribution the process of developingexplanations for events.

    Attribution Errorblaming another personsperformance failures more on the person himself

    than to external factors relating to the environment.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    42/103

    PERCEPTIONThe process through which people receive, organize,and interpret information from the environment.

    Attribution the process of developingexplanations for events.

    Attribution Errorblaming another personsperformance failures more on the person himself

    than to external factors relating to the environment.

    Self-serving bias explaining personal successby internal causes and personal failures by

    external causes.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    43/103

    PERCEPTION AND COMMUNICATIONS

    Message

    Feedback

    Perceptual Distortions-

    Senders

    Perception

    SENDER

    Receivers

    perception

    RECEIVER

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    44/103

    PERCEPTION AND COMMUNICATIONS

    Message

    Feedback

    Perceptual Distortions

    - Stereotypes- Halo effects

    - Selective perceptions

    - Projection

    Senders

    Perception

    SENDER

    Receivers

    perception

    RECEIVER

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    45/103

    Perceptual tendencies and distortions.

    A stereotype occurs when someone is identified with a group orcategory, and then oversimplified attributes associated with

    the group or category are used to describe the individual.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    46/103

    Perceptual tendencies and distortions.

    A stereotype occurs when someone is identified with a group orcategory, and then oversimplified attributes associated with

    the group or category are used to describe the individual.

    A halo effect occurs when one attribute is used to develop an

    overall impression of a person or situation.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    47/103

    Perceptual tendencies and distortions.

    A stereotype occurs when someone is identified with a group orcategory, and then oversimplified attributes associated with

    the group or category are used to describe the individual.

    A halo effect occurs when one attribute is used to develop an

    overall impression of a person or situation.

    Selective perception is the tendency to single out for attentionthose aspects of a situation or a person that reinforce or

    appear consistent with ones existing beliefs, values, or

    needs.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    48/103

    Perceptual tendencies and distortions.

    A stereotype occurs when someone is identified with a group orcategory, and then oversimplified attributes associated with

    the group or category are used to describe the individual.

    A halo effect occurs when one attribute is used to develop an

    overall impression of a person or situation.

    Selective perception is the tendency to single out for attentionthose aspects of a situation or a person that reinforce or

    appear consistent with ones existing beliefs, values, or

    needs.

    Projection is the assignment of personal attributes to otherindividuals.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    49/103

    THE NATURE OF CONFLICT

    Conflict is a disagreement between people onsubstantive or emotional issues.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    50/103

    THE NATURE OF CONFLICT

    Conflict is a disagreement between people onsubstantive or emotional issues.

    Substantive conflicts involve disagreements over

    such things as goals and tasks, allocation ofresources, distribution of rewards, policies and

    procedures, and job assignments.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    51/103

    THE NATURE OF CONFLICT

    Conflict is a disagreement between people onsubstantive or emotional issues.

    Substantive conflicts involve disagreements over

    such things as goals and tasks, allocation ofresources, distribution of rewards, policies and

    procedures, and job assignments.

    Emotional conflicts arise from feelings of anger,distrust, dislike, fear, and resentment, as well as

    from personality clashes and relationship

    problems.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    52/103

    FUNCTIONAL AND DYSFUNCTIONAL CONFLICT

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    53/103

    FUNCTIONAL AND DYSFUNCTIONAL CONFLICT

    Functional conflict, or constructive conflict,stimulates people toward greater work efforts,

    cooperation, and creativity.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    54/103

    FUNCTIONAL AND DYSFUNCTIONAL CONFLICT

    Functional conflict, or constructive conflict,stimulates people toward greater work efforts,

    cooperation, and creativity.

    Dysfunctional conflict, or destructive conflict, hurtstask performance.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    55/103

    COMMUNICATION AND CONFLICT MANAGEMENT

    Positive Moderate

    Impact on levels of conflict

    are constructive

    Neutral

    Performance Too little or too much conflict

    is destructive

    Negative

    Low Intensity of Conflict High

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    56/103

    COMMUNICATION AND CONFLICT MANAGEMENT

    Positive Moderate

    Impact on levels of conflict

    are constructiveFunctional Conflict

    Neutral

    Performance Too little or too much conflict

    is destructive

    Negative Dysfunctional Conflict

    Low Intensity of Conflict High

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    57/103

    CAUSES OF CONFLICT

    1. Role ambiguities unclear job expectations and

    other task uncertainties.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    58/103

    CAUSES OF CONFLICT

    1. Role ambiguities unclear job expectations and

    other task uncertainties.

    2. Resource scarcities

    sharing resources withothers or competing for resources.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    59/103

    CAUSES OF CONFLICT

    1. Role ambiguities unclear job expectations and

    other task uncertainties.

    2. Resource scarcities

    sharing resources withothers or competing for resources.

    3. Task interdependencies dependence of

    individuals or groups on each other in order toperform well.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    60/103

    CAUSES OF CONFLICT (continued)

    4. Competing objectivespoorly set objectives or

    poorly designed reward systems may pit

    individuals and groups against each other.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    61/103

    CAUSES OF CONFLICT (continued)

    4. Competing objectivespoorly set objectives or

    poorly designed reward systems may pit

    individuals and groups against each other.

    5. Structural differentiation differences in

    organization structures and the people staffing

    them.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    62/103

    CAUSES OF CONFLICT (continued)

    4. Competing objectivespoorly set objectives or

    poorly designed reward systems may pit

    individuals and groups against each other.

    5. Structural differentiation differences in

    organization structures and the people staffing

    them.

    6. Unresolved prior conflictsunless a conflict is

    fully resolved, it may remain latent and re-emerge.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    63/103

    How to deal with conflict

    a. Appealing to superordinate goals that focus the attentionof the conflicting parties on one mutually desirable endstate.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    64/103

    How to deal with conflict

    a.Appealing to superordinate goals that focus the attentionof the conflicting parties on one mutually desirable endstate.

    b. Making more resources available to everyone.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    65/103

    How to deal with conflict

    a.Appealing to superordinate goals that focus the attentionof the conflicting parties on one mutually desirable endstate.

    b. Making more resources available to everyone.

    c. Changing the people by replacing or transferring one ormore of the conflicting parties.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    66/103

    How to deal with conflict

    a.Appealing to superordinate goals that focus the attentionof the conflicting parties on one mutually desirable endstate.

    b. Making more resources available to everyone.

    c. Changing the people by replacing or transferring one ormore of the conflicting parties.

    d. Altering the physical environment by rearrangingfacilities, workspace, and workflows to reduceopportunities for conflict.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    67/103

    How to deal with conflict

    a.Appealing to superordinate goals that focus the attentionof the conflicting parties on one mutually desirable endstate.

    b. Making more resources available to everyone.

    c. Changing the people by replacing or transferring one ormore of the conflicting parties.

    d. Altering the physical environment by rearrangingfacilities, workspace, and workflows to reduceopportunities for conflict.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    68/103

    CONFLICT MANAGEMENT STYLES

    a.Cooperativeness is the desire to satisfy the otherpartys needs and concerns.

    b.Assertiveness is the desire to satisfy ones ownneeds and concerns.

    High

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    69/103

    Accommodation orSmoothing

    ____________________Playing down the conflict and

    seeking harmony amongparties

    Collaboration orProblem Solving

    _________________

    Searching for a solution thatmeets each others needs

    Avoidance_________________

    Denying the existence of

    conflict and hiding ones true

    feelings

    Competition or

    AuthoritativeCommand

    ______________________

    Forcing a solution to impose

    ones will on the other party

    CompromiseBargaining for gains and losses to each

    party

    g

    Low

    Low High

    Degree ofCooperativeness

    Degree ofAssertiveness

    ALTERNATIVE CONFLICT MANAGEMENT STYLES

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    70/103

    Negotiation is a problem-solving process in which

    two or more people voluntarily discuss their

    differences and attempt to reach a joint decision on

    their common concerns.

    Christopher W. Moore, PhD

    NEGOTIATION

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    71/103

    Negotiation requires participants to identify issues

    about which they differ, educate each other about

    their needs and interests, generate possiblesettlement options and bargain over the terms of the

    final agreement.

    Christopher W. Moore, PhD

    NEGOTIATION

    El t f N ti ti

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    72/103

    Elements of Negotiation

    1. Negotiation is primarily a two-party orinterpersonal processtwo individuals, twogroups, two organizations.

    El t f N g ti ti

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    73/103

    Elements of Negotiation

    1. Negotiation is primarily a two-party or

    interpersonal processtwo individuals, two

    groups, two organizations.

    2. The parties have a conflict in interest.

    Elements of Negotiation

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    74/103

    Elements of Negotiation

    1. Negotiation is primarily a two-party orinterpersonal processtwo individuals, two

    groups, two organizations.

    2. The parties have a conflict in interest.3. Negotiation is largely a voluntary activity.

    Elements of Negotiation

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    75/103

    Elements of Negotiation

    1. Negotiation is primarily a two-party or

    interpersonal processtwo individuals, two

    groups, two organizations.

    2. The parties have a conflict in interest.3. Negotiation is largely a voluntary activity.

    4. Negotiations involve the management oftwokinds of entities: the tangibles and

    intangibles.

    Elements of Negotiation

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    76/103

    Elements of Negotiation

    1. Negotiation is primarily a two-party or

    interpersonal processtwo individuals, two

    groups, two organizations.

    2. The parties have a conflict in interest.3. Negotiation is largely a voluntary activity.

    4. Negotiations involve the management of two

    kinds of entities: the tangibles and intangibles.

    5. It is a process of give and take.

    NEGOTIATION GOALS AND APPROACHES

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    77/103

    NEGOTIATION GOALS AND APPROACHES

    Two Important Goals:

    1. Substance Goalsconcerned withoutcomes, tied to content

    NEGOTIATION GOALS AND APPROACHES

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    78/103

    NEGOTIATION GOALS AND APPROACHES

    Two Important Goals:

    1. Substance Goalsconcerned withoutcomes, tied to content

    2. Relationship Goalsconcerned withprocesses, tied to way people work togetherwhile negotiating and how they will be able to

    work again in the future.

    NEGOTIATION GOALS AND APPROACHES

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    79/103

    NEGOTIATION GOALS AND APPROACHES

    Two Approaches:

    1. Competitive or Distributive Negotiationfocuses on claims made by each party for

    certain preferred outcomes.

    NEGOTIATION GOALS AND APPROACHES

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    80/103

    NEGOTIATION GOALS AND APPROACHES

    Two Approaches:

    1. Competitive or Distributive Negotiationfocuses on claims made by each party for

    certain preferred outcomes.2. Principled or Integrative Negotiation

    focuses on substance and the interests of all

    parties.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    81/103

    THREE CRITERIA FOR EFFECTIVE NEGOTIATION

    a. Qualitynegotiating a wise agreement that istruly satisfactory to all sides.

    b. Cost negotiating efficiently, using up minimumresources and time.

    c. Harmony negotiating in a way that fosters,

    rather than inhibits, interpersonal relationships.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    82/103

    GAINING INTEGRATIVE AGREEMENT

    Four rules of principled negotiation:

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    83/103

    GAINING INTEGRATIVE AGREEMENT

    Four rules of principled negotiation:

    1. Separate the people from the problem.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    84/103

    GAINING INTEGRATIVE AGREEMENT

    Four rules of principled negotiation:

    1. Separate the people from the problem.

    2. Focus on interests, not position.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    85/103

    GAINING INTEGRATIVE AGREEMENT

    Four rules of principled negotiation:

    1. Separate the people from the problem.

    2. Focus on interests, not position.3. Generate many alternatives before deciding

    what to do.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    86/103

    GAINING INTEGRATIVE AGREEMENT

    Four rules of principled negotiation:

    1. Separate the people from the problem.

    2. Focus on interests, not position.3. Generate many alternatives before deciding

    what to do.

    4. Insist that results are based on some

    objective standard.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    87/103

    GAINING INTEGRATIVE AGREEMENT

    Four rules of principled negotiation:

    1. Separate the people from the problem.

    2. Focus on interests, not position.3. Generate many alternatives before deciding

    what to do.

    4. Insist that results are based on some

    objective standard.

    GAINING INTEGRATIVE AGREEMENTS

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    88/103

    GAINING INTEGRATIVE AGREEMENTS(continued)

    Two important foundations for integrative agreements:

    GAINING INTEGRATIVE AGREEMENTS

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    89/103

    GAINING INTEGRATIVE AGREEMENTS(continued)

    Two important foundations for integrative agreements:

    1. Attitudinal Foundation willingness to trust, shareinformation with, and ask reasonable questions.

    GAINING INTEGRATIVE AGREEMENTS

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    90/103

    GAINING INTEGRATIVE AGREEMENTS(continued)

    Two important foundations for integrative agreements:

    1. Attitudinal Foundation willingness to trust, shareinformation with, and ask reasonable questions.

    2. Informational Foundation each party knowing what isreally important to them and finding out what is really

    important to the other party. Both parties should

    understand theirbest alternatives to a negotiatedagreement (BATNA).

    GAINING INTEGRATIVE AGREEMENTS

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    91/103

    GAINING INTEGRATIVE AGREEMENTS(continued)

    Two important foundations for integrative agreements:

    1. Attitudinal Foundation willingness to trust, shareinformation with, and ask reasonable questions.

    2. Informational Foundation each party knowing what isreally important to them and finding out what is really

    important to the other party. Both parties should

    understand theirbest alternatives to a negotiatedagreement (BATNA).

    BATNA - Knowing What will I do if an agreement cant

    be reached?

    THE BARGAINING ZONE IN CLASSIC TWO-PARTY NEGOTIATION.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    92/103

    Bargaining Zone

    P 400Mi

    P 1000Ui

    Mi = Managements initial offer Ui = Unions initial offer.

    THE BARGAINING ZONE IN CLASSIC TWO-PARTY NEGOTIATION.

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    93/103

    Bargaining Zone

    P 400Mi

    P 500Ur

    P 700Mr

    P 1000Ui

    Mi = Managements initial offerUr =Unions minimum reservation

    point

    Mr = Managements maximum reservationpoint

    Ui = Unions initial offer.

    NEGOTIATION PITFALLS

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    94/103

    NEGOTIATION PITFALLS

    Four negotiation pitfalls that can be avoided byproper discipline and personal attention:

    NEGOTIATION PITFALLS

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    95/103

    NEGOTIATION PITFALLS

    Four negotiation pitfalls that can be avoided byproper discipline and personal attention:

    1. Falling prey to the myth of the fixed pie.

    NEGOTIATION PITFALLS

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    96/103

    NEGOTIATION PITFALLS

    Four negotiation pitfalls that can be avoided byproper discipline and personal attention:

    1. Falling prey to the myth of the fixed pie.

    2. Non-rational escalation of the conflict.

    NEGOTIATION PITFALLS

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    97/103

    NEGOTIATION PITFALLS

    Four negotiation pitfalls that can be avoided byproper discipline and personal attention:

    1. Falling prey to the myth of the fixed pie.

    2. Non-rational escalation of the conflict.3. Overconfidence and ignoring the other partys

    needs.

    NEGOTIATION PITFALLS

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    98/103

    NEGOTIATION PITFALLS

    Four negotiation pitfalls that can be avoided byproper discipline and personal attention:

    1. Falling prey to the myth of the fixed pie.

    2. Non-rational escalation of the conflict.3. Overconfidence and ignoring the other partys

    needs.

    4. Tendency to do too much telling and too little

    hearing.

    ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    99/103

    ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

    MEDIATION

    In mediation a neutral party tries to help conflictingparties improve communication to resolve their dispute.

    ARBITRATION

    In arbitration a neutral third party issues a bindingdecision to resolve a dispute.

    ETHICAL ISSUES IN NEGOTIATION

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    100/103

    ETHICAL ISSUES IN NEGOTIATION

    1. Managers, and other negotiators, should maintain

    high ethical standards when negotiating.

    ETHICAL ISSUES IN NEGOTIATION

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    101/103

    ETHICAL ISSUES IN NEGOTIATION

    1. Managers, and other negotiators, should maintain

    high ethical standards when negotiating.

    2. Motives for unethical negotiation. Overemphasis of the profit motive.

    Competitive desire to win a negotiation.

    ETHICAL ISSUES IN NEGOTIATION

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    102/103

    ETHICAL ISSUES IN NEGOTIATION

    1. Managers, and other negotiators, should maintain

    high ethical standards when negotiating.

    2. Motives for unethical negotiation. Overemphasis of the profit motive.

    Competitive desire to win a negotiation.

    3. Tendency for rationalization. The results justifythe means.

    ETHICAL ISSUES IN NEGOTIATION(continued)

  • 7/30/2019 Comm in Ication

    103/103

    ETHICAL ISSUES IN NEGOTIATION(continued)

    While acceptance of and rationalizations ofunethical negotiating behavior can lead toshort-run gains---

    ---long-run losses may also accrue as theother parties lose their trust in the

    negotiator or seek revenge.