commission 7 - red catastro registro »...

Commission 7

Panamá 28 de Septiembre - 2016

DANIEL PÁEZ, PhD – [email protected] PÁEZ, PhD – [email protected]

LAND IS ABOUT PEOPLE

La tierra se refiere a las personas

.


PEOPLE-LAND RELATIONSHIP IS UNIQUE FOR EACH CULTURE

La relación entre tierra y personas es única para cada cultura


LAND NOT ONLY PRODUCE FOOD, GENERATES IDENTITY AND SECURITYLa tierra no solo produce tierra, genera identidad y seguridad


TODAY, YESTERDAY AND TOMORROW, CONFLICTS ARE ABOUT LAND

Los conflictos de ayer, y los de mañana, son sobre la tierra


LAND MANAGEMENT STARTED WITH TAXATION

La gestión de la tierra inició en muchos casos con impuestos


SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IS THE GOAL TODAY

Pero hoy la meta es el desarrollo sostenible

Sin embargo, lo primero que necesitamos es un mapa

BUT FIRST WE NEED A MAP


ONE CENTURY, ONE LESSON: FIT-FOR-PURPOSE

Un siglo, una lección aprendida: desarrollo de acuerdo a un propósito


• Raise awareness about necessity and benefit of property registration among society

being a mastermind in developments of good land management

• Get one step further in developing trustable, self-monitoring and sustainable land registration systems

• Use modern technologies for raising security of property information and for improving trust of citizens into systems

providing expertise for securing land tenure and advocating citizens´rights

• Make the citizen the centre of the procedures in cadastre and land management

• initiating professional discussions on new business models as required by a changing society

• Build solid long-term co-operation with UN bodies and NGOs (UN Habitat, GLTN, FAO, WB, UN GGIM e.a.)

Goals for the 4-year termFIG COMMISSION 7


Structure

V-Chair for communications, social media, web

� � � � � � � � � � � � �

WG 7.1WG 7.1

Fit-For-Purpose

LA

Ch. Lemmen (NL)

WG 7.2

LM in

CC and PP

Disaster areas

D. Páez (CO)

WG 7.3

Crowdsourcing

of Land Rights

R. McLaren (UK)

Joint WG C3/C7 3D Cadastre � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �

Chair

� � � � � � � � � � � � �

WG 7.4

Citizen

Cadastre

G. Iván (HU)

FIG COMMISSION 7


www.cadastertemplate.org


• Working Group 7.1 – Fit-For-Purpose Land Administration

• Chair: Dr. Ir. Christiaan Lemmen, The Netherlandsemail: [email protected]

•

• Policy Issues

• identify role of Fit-For-Purpose Land Administration in relation to sustainable land use, food security, climate change etc. in the post-2015 Development Agenda

• implementing the ‘Continuum of Land Rights’ and the STDM into operation at country level including innovative methodologies for fast and low cost recording of land rights and appropriate land rights for future housing, including proposals for innovative land rights (new models of leasehold, tenure of public land etc.)

• identify the value of land consolidation and land readjustment for rural and urban areas in poverty prevention programmes

• develop the second edition of the Land Administration Domain Model with ISO on behalf of FIG by integrating partners from local-national, regional and international organisations, NGOs, NPOs, insurances, re-insurances, bank companies, bar associations

• promoting the development of innovative hard- and software solutions for land administration

• identify the needs for further development, quality improvement and system optimisation after Fit-For-Purpose Land Administration is implemented


• Working Group 7.2 – Land Management in Climate Change and Pre- and Post-Disaster Areas

• Chair: Daniel Páez (PhD), Colombia, email: [email protected]•

• Policy Issues• assessment of land tenure in post-disaster areas• pre-disaster assessment / documentation of land tenure• legal/institutional/technical Fit-For-Purpose methods to secure land

rights in pre- and post-disaster areas • impact of climate change on land tenure / loss of land, land use

changes• compensation for value changes, consolidation of agricultural land,

adjustment of urban land in post disaster regions• new technologies for data capture in pre-disaster areas / validation

of third party data• cooperation models with public authorities / voluntary guidelines in

conflicts

• capacity building in disaster response bodies• spatial data infrastructures for pre-, during and post-disaster response

(link to FIG Commission 3)


Working Group 7.3 – Crowdsourcing of Land RightsChair: Dr Robin McLaren, United Kingdom, email: [email protected]

Policy Issuesfamily of mobile devices supporting remote and in-situ capture of evidence of land rightsglobal platforms managing evidence of land rights and obligationsservice delivery modelsscalability and capacity building of trusted intermediaries and land ownersrole of social media / validation of third party dataimpact on perception of security of tenuremanaging unintended consequences and privacycooperation with public authorities in recognition or conversion of informal rightslink to Working Group 7.1 Fit-For-Purpose Land Administration impact on land professionals and associate curriculum


Working Group 7.4 – Citizen Cadastre

Chair: Gyula Iván (M.Sc.), Hungary, email: [email protected]

Policy Issues

land tenure and culture and society needs

multi-dimensional and multi-temporal cadastre

security of land tenure

alternative forms of land tenure in changing society (generation property, affordable land, temporary urban and agricultural land tenure) complementary to WG 7.1

role of land owner as key stakeholder

privacy issues / access to data for citizens

responsibilities of public authorities / cooperation models / fraud prevention

analysis of trust in different land administration models

assessment models for performance of land administration systems

training of land owners / capacity building in institutional bodies

building codes and IPMS

standards for data in land administration

representation in Joint WG on 3D Cadastre of Commission 3 and 7


Cadaster 4.0

• Cadastre 4.0 as a paradigm

• close the circle between new technologies and automatisationof processes, products and services and stakeholders, including citizen and land owners as essential partners at equal level.

• It is a partnership model building coalitions /symbiosis between professionals in private and public service, between citizen and users and public authorities and between technology and society.

• Cadastre 4.0 establishes links between the virtual and real world securing interests of land owners, society, governments and economy.

• It sets the scene for permanent communication between people, procedures and products. The Internet of Things is amended by a social aspect.

• Cadastre 4.0 if implemented, will help to save resources and at the same time will provide solutions in a more flexible, a more efficient and a more social way.

Cadaster for people made by people.


Formed – updatedFormed – out of dateNot form

Source: IGAC

Investment in the last 10 years estimated at: USD$200 million

Improvement 2001-2012: 7% (area)

It would take Colombia 112 years and 7.2 billions to complete the picture

Consequences..

Cadasterproblems

Poverty

Source: IGAC Source: Rojas et al. 2009

There is a direct correlation between poverty and cadaster problems

Indiginous reserves in Colombia

INTRODUCTION

Colombia’s Current Situation

Indigenous territories are not benefiting from the rapid economic development of the country

• 29.8% of Colombian territory areindigenous reserves

• 3.28% of Colombians are indigenous

• Infrastructure on indigenous regions isscarce.

• Parcel based system conflicts with thetraditional administration of land

(Gobernación Vaupes and DANE, 2010).

Case study – Mitu Vaupes

DIFFICULTIES

No governmental

support

Lack of public

services

Lack of knowledge on geographical

limits.

The need for isolated

environments .

Workshops attractive enough

Our project

Inteligent mapping

Intelligent mapping

Community mapping

Community mapping

New technologies

New technologies

Societal administration


Tells a story of a place today for needs tomorrow

Recording knowledge

Exploring the territory

Empowering communities

Our project

General Objectives

Map

indigenous

areas using

Intelligent

mapping.

Improving social conditions.

Collects and incorporates

the knowledge and

traditions of indigenous

communities.

Identifies resources,

general boundaries

and land uses.Highlights land

fragmentation approaches.

Documents

specific data where

pressures affect tenure,

land-use or rights.

Propose reforms on existing LAS to build

a proper cadaster of

indigenous territory

Community mapping

A methodology based on the three

stages plan proposed by Herlihy

(2004)

inquire, mapping/geo-

reference and feedback.

Includes previous knowledge of the

community and area available on the

literature

Based on

circumstances of the

indigenous territories in Colombia

basic information needed to protect land rights while respecting traditions and culture.

Key research: Michael Berry from Calgary University

RESULTS

CEIMA SAN PABLO

From the fieldwork it was obtained sketchs of the territory

made by the captain, number of inhabitants, female and maleproportion and a sketch of the points obtained with the GPS.

RESULTS community mapping

CUCURA

PUEBLO NUEVO

Our project

Inteligent mapping

Intelligent mapping

Community mapping

Community mapping

New technologies

New technologies



RURAL LAND PRODUCTIVITY DEPENDS ON MANY INDEPENDENT FACTORS

Porque la producción rural depende de muchos factores


31

WE HAVE DEVELOPED A GEOGRAPHIC TOOL TO IMPROVE UNDERSTANDING RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RURAL LAND AND

INFRASTRUCTURE

Nosotros hemos desarrollado herramientas para tratar de unir estos dos factores

THIS TOOL ESTIMATES LAND VALUE INCREASES BASED ON ROAD INVESTMENT

Esta herramienta ayuda estimar incrementos en los valores de la tierra dependiendo de las inversiones en infraestructura


CROWDSOURCING: THE FUTURE

El futuro: usar las masas

FIG Com 7 Annual Meeting 2016GeoConference on Cadastre 4.0 – Participation,

Collaboration and Transparency23-28 Oct 2016, Coimbra/Portugal

http://figc7.ordemengenheiros.pt/pt/

5th International FIG Workshop on 3D CadastresFIG Com 3/ Com 7

18-20 October 2016, Athens/Greecehttp://www.gdmc.nl/3DCadastres/workshop2016

Land Consolidation and Readjustment for SustainableDevelopment - Designing Resilient Landscapes and

Empowering Communities9-11 November 2016, Apeldoorn/The Netherlands

Co-organised by FIG Com 7 / Com 8 / Dutch Kadaster / FAO

www.lcsymposium.nl

FIG Working Week 2017May 29–2 June 2017, Helsinki/Finland

http://www.fig.net/fig2017

COMM 717Annual meeting

October 2017

Cartagena – Colombia

Regional Institutes National

International Research and Training Institutes

ACADEMIC

NETWORK

Academic Network ReportAugust 2016, NY Academic Network Report

UN-GGIM academic network

Objectives of Academic

Network

• The UN-GGIM Academic Network will be a coalition of recognized universities, research and education centers or equivalent involved in the research, development and training on geospatial and land information and related matters.

• The Academic Network will be a platform for the academic community to provide input and to support UN-GGIM in achieving its vision and goals by generating a platform for academic community to input to the UN-GGIM process in the form of strategic knowledge, research, education and training, and will be a strategic arm to empower UN-GGIM to achieve their vision and goals.

• The Academic Network will provide both research and education capabilities for UN-GGIM and affiliated members to identify and response to challenges and opportunities in which UN-GGIM and related UN offices can achieve their visions.

Academic Network Report

Academic Network Task

Team Members• Prof Abbas Rajabifard,

The University of Melbourne, Australia (Chair)

• Prof Daniel Páez, University of Los Andes, Colombia (Secretary)

• Prof Huayi Wu, Wuhan University, China

• Prof Joep Crompvoets, KU Leuven, Belgium

• Prof David Coleman, University of New Brunswick, Canada

• Prof Harlan Onsrud, University of Maine, USA

• Prof Menno-Jan Kraak, University of Twente, Netherlands

• Prof Josef Strobl, University of Salzburg, Austria

• Prof Maria Antonia Brovelli, Politecnico di Milano, Italy

• Prof jide Kufoniyi, Obafemi Awolowo University, NigeriaAcademic Network Report

lab.uniandes.edu.co


Other about drones

google earth (many qualities) Fixed wind rapid mapping 8cm pixels

Multi rotor and fixed wind High quality 2cm pixels

Technology comparison

2

3

4

5

Flying planning and ejecution tools

Automatic: YES

Reliable: NO

Data processing

Urbano

Georeferncing images

PhotogrametrySpatial

analysis

Results: Fixed wind

Results: multi-rotor

DEM- DSM -DTM