cooperation fund 8 th liaison meeting on trade marks alicante, 10 – 11 october 2012 october 2012
TRANSCRIPT
Cooperation Fund8th Liaison meeting on Trade Marks
Alicante, 10 – 11 October 2012
October 2012
Intro: European TM and Design Network
There are three strategic initiatives:
2
*
*• CP and CF are part of Line of Action 6
“European Trade Mark and Design Network Programme”.• These 2 Programmes are related to:
CF: Key Initiative No. 27 CP: Key Initiative No. 28
*
*
Overview and brief description of CF Projects.
Pack 1:
• Image search by code or by use of an image recognition ability.
1.1.1 Search Image
• Free search of trade marks of all official Trademark Offices.
1.1.2 TMview
• Assist classification of goods and services, comparisons between different classification databases.
1.1.3 Euroclass
• Harmonisation of seniority information across different databases.
1.1.4 Seniority
• Common “Service charter” for National Offices
1.2.5 Quality Standards
• Standardised user satisfaction survey tool.1.2.7 User Satisfaction Survey
• Providing online information to the user on designs by creating a common database.
1.2.8 Designview
• Reach transparency and consistency on decisions related to oppositions.
1.2.9 Similarity
• Supporting examiners1.2.10 Cesto
• Completion of a standard2.13 XML Standards & Arch.
Pack 2:
• Easy, consistent and efficient way to access the software developed under the Fund.
1.2.11 Common Gateway
• Harmonised forecasting methodology for Trademarks and designs.
1.2.6 Forecasting
• Extensive suite of e-tools representing the next step in business process management for the IP Offices of Europe.
2.14 Future Software Package
• Common E-Learning tool for SMEs.3.20 E-Learning
• Common tool for user assistance.3.21 Call Centre Tool
• Database supporting enforcement of protection of intellectual property rights.
4.22 Enforcement Database
• Tool to support strategic enforcement decision makers in measuring, determining and targeting enforcement action.
4.23 Counterfeiting Tool
- Approval of Project Brief in October 2010,- Kick-off in January 2011
- Approval Project Brief in April 2011,- Kick-off in September 2011
Overview Cooperation Fund
Prototype e-learning for SMEs
Progress
SeniorityDatabase Hungary
Seniority Database Czech Republic
Seniority Database Ireland
PrototypeQuality
Standards
Prototype Designview
PrototypeSimilarity
Prototype CESTO
Prototype Enforcement Database
Prototype FSP E-Filing TM
Prototype Common Call Centre Tool
PrototypeSearch Image TMview 2
Euroclass
SeniorityDatabase Portugal
Tools and/or prototypes have been put into production or designed by CF Working Groups.
Prototype Common Gateway
Prototype Intelligence Support Tool
Intent to implement July 20121
.1.1
S
EA
RC
H I
MA
GE
1.1
.4
SE
NIO
RIT
Y
1.2
.10
CE
ST
O
1.2
.11
G
AT
EW
AY
1.2
.5
Q
UA
LIT
Y
1.2
.6
F
OR
EC
AS
TIN
G
1.2
.7
S
AT
ISF
SU
RV
EY
1.2
.8
D
ES
IGN
VIE
W
1.2
.9
S
IMIL
AR
ITY
2.1
4
FS
P
2.1
4
FS
P R
EM
AIN
DE
R
3.2
0
E-L
EA
RN
ING
3.2
1
CA
LL
CE
NT
ER
4.2
2
EN
FO
RC
EM
EN
T D
B
4.2
3
CO
UN
TE
RF
EIT
1.1
.3
EU
RO
CL
AS
S
1.1
.2
TM
VIE
W
Gra
nd
To
tal
IMP
LE
ME
NT
ED
AT 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 1BG 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 2BX 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 2CY 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13 2CZ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 3DE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 1DK 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13 3EE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 2ES 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13 3FI 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 3FR 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 2GR 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 16 2GR OBI 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 1HU 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 3IE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 2IT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 2LT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 2LV 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 15 2MT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 16 1PL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 16 1PT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 4RO 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13 2SE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 2SI 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 17 3SK 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 15 2UK 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13 3Grand Total 21 18 15 26 18 11 19 22 18 15 18 18 10 19 19 25 25 317 56
Intent to implement has grown over time, from 219 to 261 to 318.
Number of implementations per NO based on intent to implement from July 2012
A major undertaking
According to current estimates, a significant amount of man days have been foreseen for the whole lifespan of the Cooperation Fund.
Cost estimations
Projects Project review October 2011 Project review July 2012 1.1.1 Search Im 2,062,987 1,945,710 1.1.2 TMView 2,442,378 1,951,838 1.1.3 Classif 5,880,692 5,880,692 1.1.4 Seniority 770,764 705,837 1.2.10 CESTO 1,326,467 1,290,914 1.2.11 Gateway 721,915 748,671 1.2.12 QMS 1,500,000 1,500,000 1.2.5 Quality 897,058 814,097 1.2.6 Forecast 759,011 744,687 1.2.7 Satisf Sur 594,145 416,592 1.2.8 Designv 2,597,608 1,736,747 1.2.9 Similar 1,153,714 1,131,062 2.13 XMLArch 793,674 669,306 2.14 FSP 20,989,510 24,121,264 3.20 E-Learn 1,155,580 800,455 3.21 Call Center 1,221,319 1,315,440 4.22 Enforcmt DB 930,952 1,053,523 4.23 Count Std 780,520 710,854 Deployed Project Managers
1,186,225
Integration more offices 3,000,000 OHIM Architect Services 220,000 220,000
Grand Total 49,798,293 48,943,914
Implementations of CF tools
1.1.
1
SEA
RCH
IMAG
E
1.1.
4
SEN
IORI
TY
1.2.
10
CEST
O
1.2.
11 G
ATEW
AY
1.2.
5
QU
ALIT
Y
1.2.
6
FORE
CAST
ING
1.2.
7
SATI
SF S
URV
EY
1.2.
8
DESI
GN
VIEW
1.2.
9
SIM
ILAR
ITY
2.14
F
SP
2.14
F
SP R
EMAI
NDE
R
3.20
E
-LEA
RNIN
G
3.21
C
ALL C
ENTE
R
4.22
E
NFO
RCEM
ENT
DB
4.23
C
OU
NTE
RFEI
T
1.1.
2
TM
VIEW
1.1.
3
EU
ROCL
ASS
Gra
nd T
otal
IMPL
EMEN
TED
AT 2013 2012 2013 2013 2012 IMPLEM 6 1BG 2012 2013 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2013 2014 2014 2014 IMPLEM IMPLEM 14 2BX 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2014 2013 2013 2013 IMPLEM IMPLEM 11 2CY 2014 2013 2012 2012 2012 2012 2013 2013 2015 2013 2013 2012 IMPLEM 13 2CZ 2013 2011 2012 2012 2012 2013 2014 2013 2014 IMPLEM 2012 11 3DE 2012 2012 2013 2013 2013 2012 IMPLEM 7 1DK 2012 2013 2012 2012 2013 2012 2014 2013 2013 2012 2012 IMPLEM IMPLEM 13 3EE 2012 2012 2012 2012 2013 2012 2013 2014 2014 IMPLEM IMPLEM 11 2ES 2013 2013 2012 2012 2013 2013 2012 2013 2013 2013 2013 IMPLEM IMPLEM 13 3FI 2013 2012 2012 2013 2014 2013 2012 2013 IMPLEM IMPLEM 10 3FR 2014 2012 2014 2012 2012 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 IMPLEM IMPLEM 12 2GR 2013 2012 2013 2012 2012 2013 2012 2012 2013 2014 2013 2012 2012 2013 2012 IMPLEM 16 2GR OBI 2012 2012 2012 2012 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 9 1HU 2013 2011 2013 2012 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 IMPLEM 2012 12 3IE 2013 2011 2014 2012 2013 2013 2014 2013 2013 2014 2014 2014 2012 IMPLEM 14 2IT 2014 2012 2014 2014 2013 2015 2014 IMPLEM IMPLEM 9 2LT 2013 2012 2012 2013 2013 2014 2014 IMPLEM IMPLEM 9 2LV 2014 2012 2012 2012 2012 2013 2013 2012 2012 2013 2013 2013 2013 IMPLEM 2012 15 2MT 2012 2012 2013 2012 2012 2013 2013 2013 2013 2014 2013 2013 2013 2013 2012 IMPLEM 16 1PL 2014 2013 2014 2012 2012 2013 2013 2014 2014 2013 2013 2014 2014 2014 2012 IMPLEM 16 1PT 2012 2011 2012 2012 2012 2013 2013 2012 2012 2013 2013 2013 IMPLEM IMPLEM 14 4RO 2014 2012 2013 2012 2012 2013 2013 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 IMPLEM 2012 14 2SE 2012 2012 2013 2014 2014 2014 IMPLEM IMPLEM 8 2SI 2013 2012 2013 2012 2012 2014 2012 2013 2013 2013 2013 2012 2013 2014 2014 IMPLEM IMPLEM 17 3SK 2013 2013 2013 2012 2012 2012 2012 2013 2014 2012 2013 2013 2013 IMPLEM IMPLEM 15 2UK 2013 2012 2012 2012 2013 2013 2013 2013 2014 2014 2014 IMPLEM IMPLEM 13 3Total 21 18 15 26 18 11 19 22 18 15 18 18 10 19 19 25 25 318 56
Group 4- Anti-counterfeiting and piracy -
Group 5-Harmonised access to CF tools -
Group 3 - Classification & Figurative Search -
Group 1- Examination/Registration -
Group 2- Knowledge & business improvement-
What difference will all this make?
1.1.1 Search Image
1.1.2 TMview
1.1.3 Euroclass1.1.4 Seniority 1.2.5 Quality Standards
1.2.7 User Satisfaction Survey
1.2.8 Designview1.2.9 Similarity
1.2.10 CESTO
4.22 Enforcement Database
4.23 Counterfeiting Tool
2.14 E-filing
3.20 E-Learning
3.21 Call Centre Tool
1.2.11 Common Gateway
1.2.6 Forecasting
Benefits
National offices BUSINESSES, USERS
Group 1- Examination/Registration -
1.1.4 Seniority
1.2.10 CESTO
2.14 E-filing
Improvement in quality in examination results and efficiency
Increase in number of TM filings
Reduction in number of calls, e-mails and complaints
Reduction in refusals on Absolute Grounds and formalities
Reduction in the number of oppositions
Reduction in the number of cancellations
Increase in number of TM filings (without intermediaries)
Reduction of time spent for calls, e-mails and complaints
Examination and registration tools
Reduction of training cost due to ongoing best practice exchange
Improving tempo and quality of work at OSIM
National offices BUSINESSES, USERS
Increase in number of TM filings
Avoided cost to develop and run own survey
Savings in consultant costs to carry out survey
Efficiency gains by reducing time spent on obtaining info from OHIM + IP offices
Knowledge management and quality tools
Group 2- Knowledge & business improvement-
1.2.5 Quality Standards
3.20 E-Learning
3.21 Call Centre Tool
Avoided costs of developing own call centre solution
Reduction of training cost due to ongoing best practice exchange
Reduction of training cost of users due to instructive, self-guiding tools
Increase in customer satisfaction due to ease of access to information and transparency of processes
National offices BUSINESSES, USERS
TM and design searching tools
Group 3 - Classification & Figurative Search -
1.1.1 Search Image
1.1.2 TMview
1.2.8 Designview
Savings in future due to TM searches in national databases free of charge
Savings in future due to general searches in TMview database free of charge
Time savings due to simplified and fast search mechanism
Less income in future due to TM searches in national databases free of charge
More income for TMview running costs at NOs
Savings in marketing campaigns due to "self-selling" flagship tools
Increase in number of TM filings
Reduction in the number of oppositions
1.1.3 Euroclass
Improvement of examination quality and resource redeployment
Reduction in refusals on Absolute Grounds and formalities
Improving tempo and quality of work
National offices BUSINESSES, END USERS
Increase in number of TM filings
Reduction of revenue lost due to piracy and counterfeiting
Anti-counterfeiting tools
Group 4- Anti-counterfeiting and piracy -
4.22 Enforcement Database
4.23 Counterfeiting Tool
Reduction in the number of legal actions
OSIM BUSINESSES, END USERS
Increase in number of TM filings
Avoided cost of “look and feel” adaptations of individual applications
Avoided cost of “label translations” for individual applications
Reduction of time spent for calls, e-mails and complaints
Accessing tools
Reduction in examiner training cost due to ongoing best practice exchange
Group 5-Harmonised access to CF tools -
1.2.11 Common Gateway
Improving tempo and quality of work at OSIM
THANK YOU.
Information: (+ 34) 965 139 100 (switchboard)
(+ 34) 965 139 400 (e-business technical incidents)
(+ 34) 965 131 344 (main fax)
twitter/oamitweets
youtube/oamitubes