cost action mp0601 euv interference lithography with a

26
COST Action MP0601 EUV interference lithography with a laboratory gas discharge source Next-generation nanopatterning Serhiy Danylyuk

Upload: others

Post on 13-Feb-2022

8 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: COST Action MP0601 EUV interference lithography with a

COST Action MP0601

EUV interference lithography with a laboratory gas discharge source

Next-generation nanopatterning

Serhiy Danylyuk

Page 2: COST Action MP0601 EUV interference lithography with a

COST Action MP0601

2

Dr. Serhiy Danylyuk [email protected] Paris, November 18th, 2011

Outline

• Motivation

• Laboratory EUV sources

• Possible approaches to EUV-IL

• Optimisation of DPP EUV source

• Experimental realization

• Proof of principle exposures

• Summary and outlook

Page 3: COST Action MP0601 EUV interference lithography with a

COST Action MP0601

3

Dr. Serhiy Danylyuk [email protected] Paris, November 18th, 2011

There is a strong demand for lab-

scale EUV IL setup for creation of

dense periodic patterns with sub-

20 nm resolution.

Motivation

Applications:

• templates for guided self-assembly

• ultra high density patterned magnetic media

• nano-optics, meta-materials

• quantum dot 2D and 3D arrays, nanowire arrays

Page 4: COST Action MP0601 EUV interference lithography with a

COST Action MP0601

4

Dr. Serhiy Danylyuk [email protected] Paris, November 18th, 2011

Nanopatterning Solutions • Electron-beam Lithography: High resolution, limited throughput, charging

effects, proximity effect

• Nanoimprint Lithography: High resolution, high throughput , low cost, one-

to-one replication, master degradation, contact, residual layer

• Scanning probe Lithography: High resolution, limited throughput

• Self-assembly: High resolution, low pattern perfection

• EUV Interference Lithography: High resolution, moderate throughput, no

charging effect, negligible proximity effect, periodic patterns only

Currently EUV-IL is synchrotron-based limited availability

Page 5: COST Action MP0601 EUV interference lithography with a

COST Action MP0601

5

Dr. Serhiy Danylyuk [email protected] Paris, November 18th, 2011

Relevant lengths for EUV-IL Length Significance

Wavelength ~10-15 nm Spatial resolution of aerial

image

Absorption length ~50-100 nm Exposable film thickness,

surface sensitivity

Photo/secondary electron

path length < 1-2 nm Blur, proximity effect

Average distance between

photo-absorption events

~2.5nm (for dose

1000J/cm3, Eph=92.5eV) Statistics, roughness

Recording medium/process ? Molecular size, diffusion,

dissolution

H. Solak, MNE07, Copenhagen, 26 Sep 07

Page 6: COST Action MP0601 EUV interference lithography with a

COST Action MP0601

6

Dr. Serhiy Danylyuk [email protected] Paris, November 18th, 2011

Laboratory EUV sources - Coherent Direct lasing High-order harmonic generation in an atomic

gas ionized by a fs laser pulse.

*J. Rocca, Colorado State University *S.Kim et al, Nature 453,757 (2008)

P~1 mW P~ 1 nW P= 48 nW

*FST Co. & Samsung (2011)

Page 7: COST Action MP0601 EUV interference lithography with a

COST Action MP0601

7

Dr. Serhiy Danylyuk [email protected] Paris, November 18th, 2011

Laboratory EUV sources – Not coherent Laser produced plasma sources

(LPP)

Discharge plasma sources

(DPP)

Power is high enough, but spatial and temporal coherences are low.

Interference schemes with relaxed coherence requirements have to be used.

Power

Supply

energy

storage

f = j X B

I

switch

Page 8: COST Action MP0601 EUV interference lithography with a

COST Action MP0601

8

Dr. Serhiy Danylyuk [email protected] Paris, November 18th, 2011

Possible schemes for EUV-IL

q1q2

S S‘

Resolution is limited by

l/(sinq1+sinq2), max l/2.

No mask needed.

Lloyd mirror

Requirements

Temporal

coherence

Spatial

coherence

Other

High High High mirror quality

Page 9: COST Action MP0601 EUV interference lithography with a

COST Action MP0601

9

Dr. Serhiy Danylyuk [email protected] Paris, November 18th, 2011

Possible schemes for EUV-IL Grating

Requirements

Temporal

coherence

Spatial

coherence

Low High (>L)

Classical synchrotron scheme

Will not work with thermal sources due to high spatial coherence requirements

Page 10: COST Action MP0601 EUV interference lithography with a

COST Action MP0601

10

Dr. Serhiy Danylyuk [email protected] Paris, November 18th, 2011

Possible schemes for EUV-IL Double grating

Additional grating provides

solves the coherence

problem… at the cost of

~90% of power

Requirements

Temporal

coherence

Spatial

coherence

Low Low

1

12

11

2

1

ppp

Resolution limit is p2/2

Page 11: COST Action MP0601 EUV interference lithography with a

COST Action MP0601

11

Dr. Serhiy Danylyuk [email protected] Paris, November 18th, 2011

Talbot images Grating

p/2

Dl

“broadband”

EUV source

Achromatic Talbot effect

*N.Guerineau (2000), H.Solak (2005)

p

Possible schemes for EUV-IL - Talbot

Page 12: COST Action MP0601 EUV interference lithography with a

COST Action MP0601

12

Dr. Serhiy Danylyuk [email protected] Paris, November 18th, 2011

Talbot self-imaging p

z

Requirements

Bandwidth Spatial

coherence

Mask

period

Bandwidth

@11nm

Required

coherence

100 nm 3.2 % 12.5 µm

40 nm 3.2 % 5 µm

Page 13: COST Action MP0601 EUV interference lithography with a

COST Action MP0601

13

Dr. Serhiy Danylyuk [email protected] Paris, November 18th, 2011

DPP EUV source Repetition rate up to 4 kHz

EUV (10 – 20 nm): > 400 W/2psr

EUV (13.5 nm, 2% bw): 65 W/2psr

Xe

9 10 11 12 13 14 150

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Xe11+

Xe10+

Pu

lse

in

ten

sity [

mJ/

(2psr

nm

) ]

Wavelength [nm]

Xenon

Xenon + Argon

Xe9+

Ar8+

K. Bergmann, S.V. Danylyuk, L. Juschkin, J. Appl. Phys. V.106, 073309 (2009)

Admixture of Ar to Xe plasma allows

to supress 12-16 nm lines resulting in

radiation at 10.9 nm with 3.2% bw

Page 14: COST Action MP0601 EUV interference lithography with a

COST Action MP0601

14

Dr. Serhiy Danylyuk [email protected] Paris, November 18th, 2011

Source optimisation - Theory 11 nm - 4f-4d transitions

Transition probabilities:

Aul

=51011 s-1 to 21012 s-1

12 – 16 nm – 5p-4d lines

Transition probabilities:

Aul

=5109 s-1 and 51010 s-1

Doppler

l

i

l

u

ul

n

g

gA

cs lp

l

D

8

1 4

Optical depth, s,

0.1 – 1 mm for 5p-4d lines – optically thin

2 – 20 mm for 4f-4d lines – optically thick

e

l

i nnL

Brightness is scaling as:

1exp

15 D

D

e

Doppler

TEL

l

l

Reduction of the density of the emitting ions should not affect 4f-4d

transitions strongly, if a constant electron temperature is maintained

Page 15: COST Action MP0601 EUV interference lithography with a

COST Action MP0601

15

Dr. Serhiy Danylyuk [email protected] Paris, November 18th, 2011

Spatial coherence measurements

µQdIQdI

QdIQdIV

MinMax

MinMax

),(),(

),(),(

IMax

IMin

9 10 11 12 13 14 150

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Puls

e in

ten

sity [ m

J/ (2

psr

nm

) ]

Wavelength [nm]

CoherenceofDegreeµ :

VisibilityV :

Q d

Spatial coherence lengths up to 27 µm was measured

d

zlcoh

p

l

2

Page 16: COST Action MP0601 EUV interference lithography with a

COST Action MP0601

16

Dr. Serhiy Danylyuk [email protected] Paris, November 18th, 2011

Exposure stage 2” wafers;

up to 4 mm²

exposure

field size

• Wafer-mask control with nanometer precision

• Compact and rigid to minimize vibrations

• Minimum optical components to reduce power

loss

Page 17: COST Action MP0601 EUV interference lithography with a

COST Action MP0601

17

Dr. Serhiy Danylyuk [email protected] Paris, November 18th, 2011

Transmission masks For wavelengths < 12.4nm conventional Si3N4-based technology is no longer efficient due to high silicon absorption

6 8 10 12 14 16 180.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

tra

nsm

issio

n

wavelength [nm]

Nb(100nm)/Si3N

4(10nm)

Si3N

4(110nm)

Ni

Nb (100 nm)

Si3N4

Si3N4

Si (500µm)

EUV

• Flat Nb membranes with size up to 4 mm2 are achieved

• Resist patterned with 50 keV e-beam lithography

• Pattern transferred to ~80 nm thick nickel by ion beam etching

• EUV 1st order diffraction efficiency ~9-9.5%

Page 18: COST Action MP0601 EUV interference lithography with a

COST Action MP0601

18

Dr. Serhiy Danylyuk [email protected] Paris, November 18th, 2011

Transmisson measurements

4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 200.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

tra

nsm

issio

n

wavelength [nm]

Si3N

4(10nm)/Nb(100nm)

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 180.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

without filter

with 300nm Nb-filter

no

rmalise

d in

ten

sity

wavelength [nm]

Emission spectrum of DPP source with

Xe/Ar gas mixture measured with and

without 300nm Nb-filter

Theoretical transmission curves of the

investigated membrane and measured

transmittance at 11nm

48.5%

Page 19: COST Action MP0601 EUV interference lithography with a

COST Action MP0601

19

Dr. Serhiy Danylyuk [email protected] Paris, November 18th, 2011

Mask Patterns

mask layout incl. markers;

scale=100µm

1000µm

hex. pinhole array: p=100nm,

dia.=40nm; scale=200nm

rect. pinhole array: p=100nm,

dia.=40nm

nanoantenna array: p=3µm,

a=2µm, b=220nm; scale=1µm

L/S array: p=200nm, lines=160nm,

spaces=40nm; scale=200nm

Page 20: COST Action MP0601 EUV interference lithography with a

COST Action MP0601

20

Dr. Serhiy Danylyuk [email protected] Paris, November 18th, 2011

Test exposures – Talbot lithography

Proximity printing achromatic Talbot (with the

same transmission mask!)

100nm hp

Line width=120nm

50nm hp

Line width=~8±2nm

Distance to mask z= 50 µm Distance to mask z few µm

ZEP520A

Page 21: COST Action MP0601 EUV interference lithography with a

COST Action MP0601

21

Dr. Serhiy Danylyuk [email protected] Paris, November 18th, 2011

Applications

cross-bar arrays for PCRAM nanodot-arrays for QD self assembly

Nanophotonic resonators

Page 22: COST Action MP0601 EUV interference lithography with a

COST Action MP0601

22

Dr. Serhiy Danylyuk [email protected] Paris, November 18th, 2011

Lithography simulations (Dr. Litho)

Source Wavelength

Bandwidth

Pupil shape

Cone angle

Polarization

Mask Absorber

Transmittance

Scalar diffraction models

(Kirchhoff, RS I, II)

Rigorous diffraction simulation

Resist Stack, Resist parameter (Dill ABC)

Exposure time

PEB time, temp. (Diffusion)

Develop time (Mack parameter)

Resist profile (Process windows)

Gas

discharge

source

(Xe-Ar) Spot size S

“air” gap

Pupil

Transmission mask

50 %, Nb

Resist

thickness

Wafer stacks

Resist / Ti / Si

Re

fle

ctio

n c

oe

ffic

ien

t,

Tra

nsm

issi

on

co

eff

icie

nt

Simulation modules ( Research area)

Page 23: COST Action MP0601 EUV interference lithography with a

COST Action MP0601

23

Dr. Serhiy Danylyuk [email protected] Paris, November 18th, 2011

Simulations show good correlation with experimental results

• Experiment (1 min, 15µm gap, PMMA)

• Simulation (Aerial image at 15 µm gap)

Cross section

Cross section

30 nm hp Talbot carpet

Page 24: COST Action MP0601 EUV interference lithography with a

COST Action MP0601

24

Dr. Serhiy Danylyuk [email protected] Paris, November 18th, 2011

Summary • EUV Interference lithography is a powerful tool for cost

efficient patterning of nanoscale periodic arrays

• Optimized high power gas discharge source can be

effectively used as a source for EUV-IL

• Talbot lithography is the most efficient solution for

nanopatterning with sources of limited coherence.

• Nb-based transmission masks can be used as an universal

solution for interference lithography with wavelength

between 6 and 15nm

•The resolutions down to sub-10nm are possible, limited by

mask quality and resist performance

Page 25: COST Action MP0601 EUV interference lithography with a

COST Action MP0601

25

Dr. Serhiy Danylyuk [email protected] Paris, November 18th, 2011

EUV-IL exposure tool for 4“ wafers

• Input power 5.6kW

• Pinch radius 100µm

• 100W/(mm2sr) brilliance

at 10.9 nm

• 65mm x 65mm exposable

• Single field size > 4mm2

• Field exposure time < 30s

@ 30 mJ/cm2

Page 26: COST Action MP0601 EUV interference lithography with a

COST Action MP0601

26

Dr. Serhiy Danylyuk [email protected] Paris, November 18th, 2011

Acknowledgements RWTH Aachen:

Dr. Larissa Juschkin, Sascha Brose, Hyun-su Kim, Prof. P. Loosen, Prof. Th. Taubner

Fraunhofer ILT:

Dr. Klaus Bergmann, Dr. Marcus Benk

Forschungszentrum Jülich

IBN-1:

Prof. Detlev Grützmacher, Dr. Jürgen Moers, Klaus Wambach, Dr. Gregor Panaitov,

Dr. Gregor Mussler

IBN-PT:

Dr. Stefan Trellenkamp, Elke Brauweiler-Reuters, Karl-Heinz Deussen, Alfred Steffen, Hans

Wingens, Jürgen Müller, Bernd Hermans, Jana Mohr, Stephy Bunte