county brands 2010
TRANSCRIPT
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 2/62
2www.rdtrustedbrands.com
European Trusted Brands Survey 2010
Celebrating 10 years of trust
Contents
Page No:
Overview 3
How do you become a Trusted Brand? 7
The Trusted Brand logo and guidelines for its usage 8
Results – Brands:
20 common categories 9
Most nominated brands across Europe 10
All winners by country and category – share of vote 12
Comparison of winners by category – past 10 years 13
The local categories – winning brands 23
Results – Trust in:
Institutions 28
Professions 35
Family and Friends 40
Appendix
i. Response rate by country 2010 v 2009 43
ii. Respondent base 2006 – 2010 44
iii. Respondents by category by country 45
iv. Respondent profile – all countries 46
v. Respondent profile by country 47
vi. Respondent personality 48
vii. Population weightings 48
Sample questionnaire 56
Reader’s Digest circulation and readership by country 60Contacts by country 61
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 3/62
3www.rdtrustedbrands.com
Reader’s Digest Trusted Brands 2010 An overview
About the survey Reader’s Digest European Trusted Brands is now in it’s 10th year, it was first published in 2001
Fieldwork for this study, one of Europe’s broadest consumer surveys, is conducted annually andthe results are available (free of charge) via the internet
In order to allow for tracking over time every effort is made to retain consistency inmethodology, content and presentation of data
Research was conducted in 14 languages across 16 European countries
The primary focus of the study is to find out which brands Europeans trust the most
20 “brand specific” categories are common to every country
In addition to the 20 “common” categories each country had the option to include categories oftheir own choice (known as Local Categories)
All brand questions are “open ended” giving the opportunity for any brand, however small orlocal, an equal chance of being nominated
Fieldwork has traditionally been conducted by mail (apartfrom the U.K.). However, this year, 8 countries took the on-line option for data gathering (see below)
In total 32,163 responses were analysed across 16countries
Sample selection and results were weighted, with the aimof reflecting the broad population profile of each countrywhere the survey was undertaken. Response from thoseaged 15–19yrs was low, so we excluded this group fromour analysis to avoid over weighting and misrepresentationof brand preference
Each country had a “target maximum” number of responses, this varied according their needs.Germany had an especially high target response to enable detailed analysis and comparisonbetween East & West
Respondents in Germany represent 25% of the total sample. So, to fairly reflect thepersonalities and opinions of all respondents, each country was given an equal weight. Hence“Average all countries” for personality traits, trust in institutions, professions etc. reflects the“average of the average” across all 16 countries
Data processing and tabulation for all countries (postal and on-line) was conducted by WymanDillon Ltd. who are based in Bristol
Across Europe almost 131,000 different names were nominated by respondents as their mostTrusted Brands
The category of cars contains by far the highest number of brand nominations (>21,000) and“vitamins” the least (7,444). Breakfast cereal is also low (10,218). This is because bothcategories had a high number of generic nominations e.g. muesli, apple etc. which wereexcluded from the analysis.
32,163 participantsacross Europe
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 5/62
131,000 unique
nominations for
Trusted Brands
5www.rdtrustedbrands.com
Reader’s Digest Trusted Brands Survey 2010 An overview
About the questions - postal
To begin, respondents were asked to indicate their degree of trust in 16 institutionsincluding banks and trade unions
They then indicated their level of trust in 20 professions ranging from car salesmen tofarmers
A new section “Trust in Family and Friends” was added this year
From a list of 30 personality types respondents indicated the adjectives that bestdescribed them
The 20 common product categories have remained the same for the past 5 years (since2006)
After nominating their most “trusted brand” in each category, respondents rated thatbrand in terms of “Quality”, “Excellent Value”, “Strong Image” and “Understandscustomer needs”. They also indicated if they were a customer/buyer of the brand they’dnominated and if they would recommend the brand to others
The on-line questionnaire:
Although the content of the on-line questionnaire was the same as for the postal survey thenature of the medium allows for more interaction. Categories were rotated and interspersedwith questions about trust in professions, institutions, family & friends and personality
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 6/62
>15,000 people
named their trusted
brand of PC
6www.rdtrustedbrands.com
Reader’s Digest Trusted Brands Survey 2010 An overview
The 20 categories common to each country are:
Car
Kitchen ApplianceCameraPersonal ComputerMobile Phone HandsetMobile Phone Service ProviderInternet Service ProviderHoliday Company/Tour OperatorBank Building SocietyCredit CardInsurance CompanyPetrol RetailerVitamins
Analgesic/Pain ReliefCough/Cold Remedy
Hair Care ProductCosmeticSkin Care ProductSoap PowderBreakfast Cereal
A list of the local categories (as chosen by each country) can be found in the results section
Countries included in the survey are:
Country Language Fieldwork
Austria German postBelgium Flemish & French on-lineCzech Republic Czech on-line
Finland Finnish postFrance French on-lineGermany German postHungary Hungarian on-lineNetherlands Dutch on-linePoland Polish on-linePortugal Portuguese postRomania Romanian postRussia Russian on-lineSpain Spanish postSweden Swedish postSwitzerland German & French postUK English on-line
A sample copy of the postal questionnaire (in English) can be found in the appendix at theback of this book.
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 7/62
7www.rdtrustedbrands.com
European Trusted Brands 2010
How do you become a trusted brand?
Awarding Trusted Brands StatusIn each country/category the Trusted Brand is the one receiving the highest number ofnominations. It is a simple and transparent approach which is easy for everyone tounderstand and communicate.
To be included in the published list of nominated brands a brand must achieve 10+ votes.This has been increased from 20 in previous years to allow for more brands to be identifiedand thus evaluated.
The Qualitative Data/Attributes After a respondent names the brand they trust the most in each category, they’re asked torate that brand on 4 criteria – quality, excellent value, strong image, understand customerneeds. Each has a maximum score of 5. The data reported for each brand consists of onlythe opinions of those respondents who voted for that brand – not the sample as a whole.
Attribute scores have only been calculated for brands with 20+ votes.
Attribute AwardsIt’s possible to be top scoring against any of the attributes but not be the No1 “TrustedBrand” in a category. This is because respondents who vote for a brand may recognise aparticular area of strength in just one or two areas.
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 8/62
8www.rdtrustedbrands.com
European Trusted Brands 2010
The Trusted Brands logo and guidelines for its usage
1. Permission in principle is given for winning brands touse the Trusted Brands logo across the full range ofmarketing and advertising materials, including but notlimited to:• advertising campaigns• promotional literature (flyers, brochures, point-of-
purchase materials, company newsletters, annualreports etc.)
• press releases• websites• product (labels, stickers, shipping cartons)
2. Winners may only use the logo in promotional materialswithin the countries where they were awarded TrustedBrand status.
3. Winners must use the logo only in relation to therelevant category of their award.
4. Winners may only use the logo for the year in which itwas awarded, unless the award has been won inmultiple years, in which case reference may be made tothe multiple years for which the award was granted.The year is from 01 January to 31 December.
5. No alteration of the logo design or wording is permittedwithout specific permission. Ideally, the logo should bein either the specified blue, black, or white out of abackground colour but where the colours used by aTrusted Brand in, for example advertising, or packagingdo not allow use of Trusted Brands blue logo, the logo
may be used in other colours to tie-in with the corporatecolours of the Trusted Brand. Only the whole logo canbe used. There should also be space around the logo,as a guide this should be no less than the width of twostars from the logo edge.
6. Winners may not use the logo in conjunction withspecific reference to any competitor or competitiveproduct.
7. Winners desiring to use the logo must submit relevantcopy and/or materials to Reader’s Digest forauthorisation in advance of use. Reader’s Digest agreesto respond promptly to all such requests, and reservesthe right to deny any use at any time at our solediscretion. It is further understood that Reader’s Digest
may not be held responsible in any way for any claimsarising out of the use of the logo by winners.
8. No endorsement of the winning brand(s) by Reader’sDigest or its editors is given or may be implied.
For further information or clarification contact Gavin Murrayon 020 7715 8927 or at [email protected].
January 2010
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 9/62
9www.rdtrustedbrands.com
Results - the Trusted Brands
20 common categories
20 brand categories are “common” to every country.They’ve remained unchanged for the past 5 years, with onlyminor amendments in the years prior to that.
In addition to the common categories, each country hadthe option to include a range of categories of their ownchoice (known as Local Categories).
The winning brand (in each country) is the one that receivesthe highest number of nominations in that country. There isno award for an overall winner across the 16 countries.
The category questions are “open ended” givingrespondents the freedom to nominate any brand of theirchoice in answer to the question: Tell us the brand youbelieve most deserves to be called your “most trusted
brand”. This method gives all brands an equal chance ofbeing nominated, regardless of whether or not they arelocally or internationally known.
Most nominated brands across thecommon categories
• Nivea continues to be the brand of skin care that people
universally trust the most (winner in 16 out of 16countries). A status the brand has held for 6 years
• Nivea also wins Trusted Brand of cosmetic in 7
countries, increased from 5 in 2009
• For the first time in 10 years Nokia is no longer the
Trusted Brand of mobile phone in every country. It wasnarrowly beaten by Samsung in France and SonyEricsson in Sweden
• There is no change to the line up of trusted brands in
the category of credit card. In 14 out of 16 countriesVisa retains the pole position
• Canon is now the trusted brand of camera in 14
countries, taking over from Sony in Romania and Spain.In Poland Sony regained its No1 position from Canon
• Kellogg’s is the trusted brand of breakfast cereal in 10
Western European countries, with Nestlé predominatingin 3 out of 5 CEER countries + Portugal
• VW has regained its position as Belgium’s most trusted
brand of car but Mercedes has lost to Toyota in Portugal
and Dacia in Romania
• For the first time Bosch is the Trusted Brand of kitchenappliance in 3 countries
• Soap powder is one of the most stable categories with
virtually no change in winners over the years
• Perhaps unsurprisingly, in the current economic climate,
there were changes to the Trusted Brands ofbanks/building society in Belgium, Romania, Spain andU.K.
• Trusted brands in the health, financial and travel
categories remain diverse and local across the 16countries
• Mobile phone service providers also tend to be local.
Orange was the only brand to win in 3 countries,Vodafone and T-Mobile came top in just 2 countrieseach
• The most dynamic and “local” of all categories is that of
ISP (Internet Service Provider) where a different brandwon in each of the 16 countries. There were also anumber of changes in winning brand over 2009
For further information (e.g. brand attribute scores) andnames of all runners up in each country please contact thecountry representative – details can be found on the final
page of this book.
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 10/62
10www.rdtrustedbrands.com
Results - the Trusted Brands
Most Trusted Brands across Europe 2010
Most Trusted Brands across Europe 2010
Brands winning in No.3+ countries: Countries:
2010 2009
Nivea (skin care) 16 16
Nokia 14 16
Visa 14 14
Canon 14 13
Kellogg's 10 10
HP/HP Compaq 7 9 Ariel 7 6
Nivea (cosmetic) 7 5
Miele 6 6
Nestlé 4 5
Dell 4 4
Aspirin 3 4
Avon 3 4
Centrum 3 4
VW 3 4
Pantene 3 3
Persil 3 3
Toyota 3 3
L'Oréal (Hair care) 3 2
Schwarzkopf 3 2
Opel 3 2
Orange 3 2
Bosch 3 1
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 11/62
11www.rdtrustedbrands.com
Categories with most “multi country” winning brands:
Category Number of different Brands winning in
brands winning more than 3 countries
across Europe in this category
Skin Care 1 Nivea
Mobile Phone 3 Nokia
Camera 3 Canon
Credit Card 3 Visa
Breakfast Cereal 4 Kellogg’s, Nestlé
PC 6 HP, DellCosmetic 6 Nivea, Avon
Soap Powder 8 Ariel, Persil
Car 9 Opel, Toyota, VW
Hair Care 9 Pantene, L’Oréal, Schwarzkopf
Kitchen Appliance 9 Bosch, Miele
Mobile Phone Service 12 Orange
Vitamins 13 Centrum
Pain Relief 13 Aspirin
Insurance Company 14 -
Petrol Retailer 14 -
Cold Remedy 15 -Bank/Building Society 15 -
Holiday Company 15 -
Internet Service Provider 16 -
Results - the Trusted Brands
Most Trusted Brands across Europe 2010
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 13/62
13www.rdtrustedbrands.com
C o m p a r i s o n o f w i n n i n g b r a n d s o v e r 1 0 y e a r s
A u t o
m o t i v e
2 0 1 0
2 0 0 9
2 0 0 8
2 0 0 7
2 0 0 6
2 0 0 5
2 0 0 4
2
0 0 3
2 0 0 2
2 0 0 1
A u s
t r i a
V W
V W
V W
V W
V W
V W
V W
V W
B e l g i u m
V W
T o y o t a
V W
V W
V W
O p e l
V W
T o
y o t a
V W
M e r c e d e s
C z e
c h
S k o d a
S k o d a
S k o d a
S k o d a
S k o d a
S k o d a
S k o d a
S k o d a
S k o d a
S k o d a
F i n l a n d
T o y o t a
T o y o t a
T o y o t a
T o y o t a
T o y o t a
T o y o t a
V o l v o
T o
y o t a
V o l v o
V o l v o
F r a n c e
R e n a u l t
R e n a u l t
R e n a u l t
R e n a u l t
R e n a u l t
R e n a u l t
R e n a u l t
R e
n a u l t
R e n a u l t
R e n a u l t
G e r
m a n y
V W
V W
V W
V W
V W
V W
V W
M e r c e d e s
M e r c e d e s
V W
H u n
g a r y
O p e l
O p e l
O p e l
O p e l
O p e l
O p e l
O p e l
O
p e l
O p e l
O p e l
N e t h e r l a n d s
O p e l
O p e l
O p e l
O p e l
O p e l
O p e l
O p e l
O
p e l
O p e l
O p e l
P o l a n d
O p e l
V W
V W
T o y o t a
M e r c e d e s
M e r c e d e s
M e r c e d e s
M e r c e d e s
M e r c e d e s
M e r c e d e s
P o r t u g a l
T o y o t a
M e r c e d e s
M e r c e d e s
M e r c e d e s
M e r c e d e s
M e r c e d e s
M e r c e d e s
M e r c e d e s
M e r c e d e s
M e r c e d e s
R o m
a n i a
D a c i a
M e r c e d e s
M e r c e d e s
M e r c e d e s
C o u n t r y n o t i n c l u d e d
R u s
s i a
T o y o t a
T o y o t a
T o y o t a
T o y o t a
B M W
B M W
M e r c e d e s
M e r c e d e s
M e r c e d e s
M e r c e d e s
S p a
i n
M e r c e d e s
M e r c e d e s
M e r c e d e s
M e r c e d e s
M e r c e d e s
M e r c e d e s
M e r c e d e s
M e r c e d e s
M e r c e d e s
M e r c e d e s
S w e d e n
V o l v o
V o l v o
V o l v o
C o u n t r y n o t i n c l u d e d
S w i t z e r l a n d
V W
V W
T o y o t a
V W
T o y o t a
T o y o t a
V W
V W
V W
O p e l
U K
F o r d
F o r d
F o r d
F o r d
F o r d
F o r d
F o r d
F
o r d
F o r d
F o r d
K i t c h e n
a p p l i a n c e s
2 0 1 0
2 0 0 9
2 0 0 8
2 0 0 7
2 0 0 6
2 0 0 5
2 0 0 4
2
0 0 3
2 0 0 2
2 0 0 1
A u s
t r i a
M i e l e
M i e l e
M i e l e
M i e l e
M i e l e
M i e l e
M i e l e
M
i e l e
B e l g i u m
M i e l e
M i e l e
M i e l e
M i e l e
M i e l e
M i e l e
M i e l e
M
i e l e
M i e l e
M i e l e
C z e
c h
E t a
E t a
E t a
E t a
E t a
E t a
E t a
E t a
E t a
E t a
F i n l a n d
U p o
U p o
U p o
U p o
U p o
U p o
U p o
U p o
U p o
P h i l i p s
F r a n c e
W h i r l p o o l P h i l i p s
B r a n d t
B r a n d t
B r a n d t
B r a n d t
B r a n d t
B r a n d t
W h
i r l p o o l
B r a n d t
B r a n d t
G e r
m a n y
M i e l e
M i e l e
M i e l e
M i e l e
M i e l e
M i e l e
M i e l e
M
i e l e
M i e l e
M i e l e
H u n
g a r y
B o s c h
Z a n u s s i
Z a n u s s i
Z a n u s s i
W h i r l p o o l
W h i r l p o o l
W h i r l p o o l
W h
i r l p o o l
M o u l i n e x
M o u l i n e x
N e t h e r l a n d s
M i e l e
M i e l e
M i e l e
M i e l e
M i e l e
P h i l i p s
P h i l i p s
P h i l i p s
P h i l i p s
P h i l i p s
P o l a n d
B o s c h
A m i c a
A m i c a
A m i c a
A m i c a
A m i c a
A m i c a
A
m i c a
A m i c a
P o l a r
P o r t u g a l
M i e l e
M i e l e
M i e l e
M i e l e
M i e l e
M i e l e
M i e l e
M
i e l e
M o u l i n e x
M i e l e
R o m
a n i a
P h i l i p s
P h i l i p s
P h i l i p s
A r c t i c
C o u n t r y n o t i n c l u d e d
R u s
s i a
B o s c h
S a m s u n g
S a m s u n g
S a m s u n g
B o s c h
B o s c h
B o s c h
B
o s c h
B o s c h
B o s c h
S p a
i n
F a g o r
B o s c h
F a g o r
B o s c h
F a g o r
F a g o r
F a g o r
F
a g o r
F a g o r
B o s c h
S w e d e n
E l e c t r o l u x
E l e c t r o l u x
E l e c t r o l u x
C o u n t r y n o t i n c l u d e d
E l e c t r o l u x
E l e c t r o l u x
E l e c t r o l u x
S w i t z e r l a n d
M i e l e
M i e l e
M i e l e
M i e l e
M i e l e
M i e l e
V - Z u g
M
i e l e
M i e l e
M i e l e
U K
H o t p o i n t
H o t p o i n t
H o t p o i n t
H o t p o i n t
H o t p o i n t
H o t p o i n t
H o t p o i n t
H o
t p o i n t
H o t p o i n t
H o t p o i n t
Results - the Trusted Brands
Comparison of winning brands over 10 years
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 14/62
14www.rdtrustedbrands.com
Results - the Trusted Brands
Comparison of winning brands over 10 years
C o
m p a r i s o n o f w i n n i n g b r a n d s o v
e r 1 0 y e a r s
P e r s o n
a l C o m p u t e r
2 0 1 0
2 0 0 9
2 0 0 8
2 0 0 7
2 0 0 6
2 0 0 5
2 0 0 4
2
0 0 3
2 0 0 2
2 0 0 1
A u s t r i a
H P
H P
H P
I B M
I B M
I B M
I B M
I B M
B e l g i u m
H P C o m p a q
H P C o m p a q
H P C o m p a q
H P C o m p a q
H P C o m p a q
D e l l
C o m p a q
C o
m p a q
C o m p a q
C o m p a q
C z e
c h
A c e r
H P
A c e r
A c e r
B r a v e
I B M
I n t e l
I n t e l
I n t e l
I B M
F i n l a n d
H P
H P
H P
H P
H P
H P
H e w l e t t P a c k a r d
C o
m p a q
I B M
I B M
F r a
n c e
H P
H P C o m p a q
H P C o m p a q
H P
H P
H P
H e w l e t t P a c k a r d H e w l e
t t P a c k a r d
I B M
H e w l e t t P a c k a r
d
G e r m a n y
F u j i t s u S i e m e n s F u j i t s u S i e m e
n s F u j i t s u S i e m e n s F u j i t s u S i e m e n s S i e m e n
s
S i e m e n s
S i e m e n s
S i e m e n s
S i e m e n s
S i e m e n s
H u n g a r y
A s u s
H P C o m p a q
L e n o v o
L e n o v o
I B M
I B M
I B M
I B M
I B M
I B M
N e t h e r l a n d s
H P C o m p a q
H P C o m p a q
H P C o m p a q
H P C o m p a q
H P C o m p a q
D e l l
D e l l
C o
m p a q
C o m p a q
C o m p a q
P o l a n d
T o s h i b a
T o s h i b a
T o s h i b a
I B M
I B M
I B M
I B M
I B M
I B M
I B M
P o r t u g a l
H P
H P
H P
H P
H P
H P
C o m p a q
C o
m p a q
C o m p a q
I B M
R o m a n i a
D e l l
D e l l
I B M
I B M
C o u n t r y
n o t i n c l u d e d
R u s s i a
A s u s
S a m s u n g
S a m s u n g
S a m s u n g
S a m s u n g
S a m s u n g
S a m s u n g
I B M
I B M
I B M
S p a
i n
H P
H P
H P
H P
H P
I B M
I B M
I B M
I B M
I B M
S w e d e n
D e l l
D e l l
D e l l
C o u n t r y n o t i n c l u d e d
D e l l
C o m p a q
I B M
S w i t z e r l a n d
D e l l
D e l l
D e l l
D e l l
D e l l
D e l l
D e l l
C o
m p a q
C o m p a q
C o m p a q
U K
D e l l
D e l l
D e l l
D e l l
D e l l
D e l l
D e l l
D e l l
D e l l
H e w l e t t P a c k a r
d
I n t e r n e
t s e r v i c e p r o v i d e r
I n t e r n e t
d o t c o m
2 0 1 0
2 0 0 9
2 0 0 8
2 0 0 7
2 0 0 6
2 0 0 5
2 0 0 4
2
0 0 3
2 0 0 2
2 0 0 1
A u s t r i a
T e l e k o m
A u s t r i a T e l e k o m
A u s t
r i a A - O n l i n e
A - O n l i n e
A - O n l i n e
C h e l l o
A O N
C
h e l l o
B e l g i u m
T e l e n e t
B e l g a c o m
T e l e n e t
B e l g a c o m
B e l g a c o m
T e l e n e t
T e l e n e t
T e l e n e t
B e l g a c o m
B e l g a c o m
C z e
c h
S e z n a m
S e z n a m
S e z n a m
S e z n a m
S e z n a m
S e z n a m
S e z n a m
T
i s c a l i
S e z n a m
C o n t a c t e l
F i n l a n d
S o n e r a
S o n e r a
E l i s a
E l i s a
E l i s a
H o b b y H a l l
H o b b y H a l l
N e t A n t t i l a
N e t A n t t i l a
N e t A n t t i l a
F r a
n c e
O r a n g e
O r a n g e
O r a n g e
O r a n g e
W a n a d o o
W a n a d o o
W a n a d o o
W a
n a d o o
W a n a d o o
W a n a d o o
G e r m a n y
T - O n l i n e
G o o g l e
A O L
A O L
A O L
A O L
A O L
A O L
A O L
A O L
H u n g a r y
T - H o m e
T - O n l i n e
T - O n l i n e
T - O n l i n e
T - O n l i n e
A x e l e r o
A x e l e r o
A x e l e r o
A x e l e r o
M a t a ' v N e t
N e t h e r l a n d s
Z i g g o
Z i g g o
H e t N e t ( K P N ) H e t N e t ( K P N ) H e t N e t ( K P
N )
W a n a d o o
P l a n e t I n t e r n e t P l a n e
t I n t e r n e t
P l a n e t I n t e r n e t P l a n e t I n t e r n e t
P o l a n d
A l l e g r o
N e o s t r a d a T P
N e o s t r a d a T P
N e o s t r a d a T P
O n e t . P L
O n e t . P l
O n e t . P l
O n e t . P l
O n e t . P l
O n e t . P l
P o r t u g a l
S a p o
S a p o
S a p o
S a p o
S a p o
S a p o
S a p o
S
a p o
S a p o
S a p o / N e t S a p o
R o m a n i a
R C S & R D S
R C S & R D S
R C S & R D S
R D S
C o u n t r y
n o t i n c l u d e d
R u s s i a
C o r b i n a
C o m s t a r
C o m s t a r
M T U ( I n t e l )
M T U I n f o r
m
M T U I n f o r m
M T U I n f o r m
M T U
I n f o r m
M T U I n f o r m
C i t y L i n e
S p a
i n
T e l e f ó n i c a
T e l e f ó n i c a
T e l e f ó n i c a
T e l e f ó n i c a
T e l e f ó n i c a
G o o g l e
T e r r a
T e r r a
T e r r a
T e r r a
S w e d e n
T e l i a
T e l i a
T e l i a
C o u n t r y n o t i n c l u d e d
T e l i a
B o l . C o m
T e l i a
S w i t z e r l a n d
S w i s s c o m /
B l u e w i n
B l u e w i n
B l u e w i n
B l u e w i n
B l u e w i n
B l u e w i n
B l u e w i n
B l u e w i n
B l u e w i n
B l u e w i n
U K
V i r g i n
B T
V i r g i n
B T
A O L
A O L
A O L
A O L
A O L
A O L
T h i s
c a t e g o r y w a s a m e n d e d i n 2 0 0 6 f r o m
I n t e r n e t / D o t C o m
t o I n t e r n e t S e r v i c e P r o v i d e r
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 15/62
15www.rdtrustedbrands.com
Results - the Trusted Brands
Comparison of winning brands over 10 years
C o
m p a r i s o n o f w i n n i n g b r a n d s o v
e r 1 0 y e a r s
M o b i l e p
h o n e h a n d s e t
2 0 1 0
2 0 0 9
2 0 0 8
2 0 0 7
2 0 0 6
2 0 0 5
2 0 0 4
2
0 0 3
2 0 0 2
2 0 0 1
A u s t r i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
B e l g i u m
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
C z e c h
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
F i n
l a n d
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
F r a
n c e
S a m s u n g
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
G e
r m a n y
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
H u
n g a r y
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N e t h e r l a n d s
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
P o l a n d
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
P o r t u g a l
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
R o m a n i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
C o u n t r y
n o t i n c l u d e d
R u s s i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
S p a i n
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
S w
e d e n
S o n y E r i c s s o n
N o k i a
N o k i a
C o u n t r y n o t i n c l u d e d
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
S w
i t z e r l a n d
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
U K
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
N o k i a
M o b i l e p h o
n e
s e r v i c e p r o v i d e r
2 0 1 0
2 0 0 9
2 0 0 8
2 0 0 7
2 0 0 6
2 0 0 5
2 0 0 4
2
0 0 3
2 0 0 2
2 0 0 1
A u s t r i a
A 1
A 1
A 1
A 1
A 1
c a t e g o r y
n o t i n c l u d e d
B e l g i u m
P r o x i m u s
B e l g a c o m
P r o x i m u s
P r o x i m u s
P r o x i m u s
C z e c h
T - M o b i l e
T - M o b i l e
O 2
T - M o b i l e
T - M o b i l e
F i n
l a n d
S o n e r a
S o n e r a
S o n e r a
S o n e r a
S o n e r a
F r a
n c e
O r a n g e
O r a n g e
O r a n g e
O r a n g e
O r a n g e
G e
r m a n y
V o d a f o n e
V o d a f o n e
V o d a f o n e
V o d a f o n e
V o d a f o n e
H u
n g a r y
T - M o b i l e
T - M o b i l e
T - M o b i l e
T - M o b i l e
T - M o b i l e
N e t h e r l a n d s
K P N
K P N
K P N
K P N
K P N
P o l a n d
O r a n g e
P l u s
E R A
O r a n g e
O r a n g e
P o r t u g a l
T M N
T M N
T M N
T M N
T M N
R o
m a n i a
V o d a f o n e
V o d a f o n e
V o d a f o n e
V o d a f o n e / O r a n g e
C o u n t r y
n o t i n c l u d e d
R u s s i a
M T S
M T S
M T S
B e e l i n e
M T S
S p a i n
M o v i s t a r
M o v i s t a r
M o v i s t a r
M o v i s t a r
M o v i s t a r
S w
e d e n
T e l i a
T e l i a
T e l i a
C o u n t r y
n o t i n c l u d e d
S w
i t z e r l a n d
S w i s s c o m
S w i s s c o m
S w i s s c o m
S w i s s c o m
S w i s s c o m
U K
O r a n g e
O r a n g e
O 2
O 2
O r a n g e
T h i s
c a t e g o r y w a s i n c l u d e d i n a l l c o u n t r i e s f o r t h e f i r s t t i m e i n 2 0 0 6
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 16/62
16www.rdtrustedbrands.com
Results - the Trusted Brands
Comparison of winning brands over 10 years
C o m p a r i s o n o f w i n n i n g b r a n d s o v e r 1 0 y e a r s
C a m e r a
2 0 1 0
2 0 0
9
2 0 0 8
2 0 0 7
2 0 0 6
2 0 0 5
2 0 0 4
2 0 0 3
2 0 0 2
2 0 0 1
A u s t r i a
C a n o n
C a n o
n
C a n o n
C a n o n
C a
n o n
C a n o n
C a n o n
C a n o n
B e l g i u m
C a n o n
C a n o
n
C a n o n
C a n o n
C a
n o n
C a n o n
C a n o n
C a n o n
C a n o n
C a n o
n
C z e c h
O l y m p u s
O l y m p
u s
O l y m p u s
O l y m p u s
O l y m p u s
O l y m p u s
O l y m p u s
O l y m p u s
O l y m p u s
O l y m p
u s
F i n l a n d
C a n o n
C a n o
n
C a n o n
C a n o n
C a
n o n
C a n o n
C a n o n
C a n o n
C a n o n
C a n o
n
F r a n c e
C a n o n
C a n o
n
C a n o n
C a n o n
C a
n o n
C a n o n
C a n o n
C a n o n
C a n o n
C a n o
n
G e r m a n y
C a n o n
C a n o
n
C a n o n
C a n o n
C a
n o n
C a n o n
C a n o n
C a n o n
C a n o n
C a n o
n
H u n g a r y
C a n o n
C a n o
n
C a n o n
C a n o n
C a
n o n
C a n o n
C a n o n
C a n o n
C a n o n
C a n o
n
N e t h e r l a n d s
C a n o n
C a n o
n
C a n o n
C a n o n
C a
n o n
C a n o n
C a n o n
C a n o n
C a n o n
C a n o
n
P o l a n d
S o n y
C a n o
n
S o n y
S o n y
S o n y
S o n y
S o n y
S o n y
S o n y
S o n y
P o r t u g a l
C a n o n
C a n o
n
C a n o n
C a n o n
C a
n o n
C a n o n
C a n o n
C a n o n
C a n o n
C a n o
n
R o m a n i a
C a n o n
S o n
y
S o n y
S o n y
C o u n t r y n o t i n c l u d e d
R u s s i a
C a n o n
C a n o
n
C a n o n
K o d a k
K o
d a k
K o d a k
K o d a k
K o d a k
S o n y
K o d a
k
S p a i n
C a n o n
S o n
y
C a n o n
C a n o n
S o n y
S o n y
S o n y
S o n y
S o n y
N i k o n
S w e d e n
C a n o n
C a n o
n
C a n o n
C o u n t r y n o t i n c l u d e d
C a n o n
C a n o n
C a n o
n
S w i t z e r l a n d
C a n o n
C a n o
n
C a n o n
C a n o n
C a
n o n
M i n o l t a
C a n o n
C a n o n
C a n o n / M i n o l t a
C a n o
n
U K
C a n o n
C a n o
n
C a n o n
C a n o n
C a
n o n
C a n o n
C a n o n
C a n o n
C a n o n
C a n o
n
H o l i d a y
c o m p a n y / t o u r o p e r a t o r
2 0 1 0
2 0 0
9
2 0 0 8
2 0 0 7
2 0 0 6
2 0 0 5
2 0 0 4
2 0 0 3
2 0 0 2
2 0 0 1
A u s t r i a
T u i
T u i
T u i
T u i
T u i
T u i
T u i
T u i
B e l g i u m
N e c k e r m a n n
N e c k e r m
a n n
N e c k e r m a n n
N e c k e r m a n n
N e c k e r m a n n
N e c k e r m a n n
N e c k e r m a n n
N e c k e r m a n n
N e c k e r m a n n
N e c k e r m
a n n
C z e c h
C e d o k
C e d o
k
C e d o k
C e d o k
C e
d o k
C e d o k
F i s c h e r
F i s c h e r
F i s c h e r
F i s c h e r
F i n l a n d
A u r i n k o m a t k a t A u r i n k o m
a t k a t A u r i n k o m a t k a t A u r i n k o m a t k a t A u r i n k
o m a t k a t A u r i n k o m a t k a t
A u r i n k o m a t k a t A u r i n k o m a t k a t
A u r i n k o m a t k a t A u r i n k o m
a t k a t
F r a n c e
P i e r r e E t
P i e r r e
E t
F r a m
F r a m
C
l u b
F r a m
F r a m
C l u b
C l u b
C l u b
V a c a n c e s -
V a c a n c
e s -
M é d i t
e r r a n é e
M é d i t e r r a n é e
M é d i t e r r a n é e
M é d i t e r r a n é e
M a e v a
M a e v a
G e r m a n y
T u i
T u i
T u i
T u i
T u i
T u i
T u i
T u i
T u i
T u i
H u n g a r y
I b u s z
I b u s
z
I b u s z
I b u s z
I b
u s z
I b u s z
I b u s z
I b u s z
I b u s z
I b u s z
N e t h e r l a n d s
D - R e i z e n
D - R e i z e n
D - R e i z e n
D - R e i z e n
D - R
e i z e n
D - R e i z e n
D - R e i z e n
D - R e i z e n
H o l l a n d
H o l l a n
d
I n t e r n a t i o n a l
I n t e r n a t i o n a l
P o l a n d
O r b i s T r a v e l
O r b i s T r a v e l
O r b i s T r a v e l
O r b i s T r a v e l
O r b i s
T r a v e l
O r b i s T r a v e l
O r b i s T r a v e l
O r b i s T r a v e l
O r b i s T r a v e l
O r b i s T r
a v e l
P o r t u g a l
A b r e u
A b r e
u
A b r e u
A b r e u
A b r e u
A b r e u
A b r e u
A b r e u
A b r e u
A b r e u
R o m a n i a
P a r a l e l a 4 5
P a r a l e l a 4 5
A t l a s s i b
A t l a s s i b
C o u n t r y n o t i n c l u d e d
R u s s i a
T e z T o u r
T e z T o
u r
T e z T o u r
N e v a
N
e v a
N e v a
N e v a
N e v a
N e v a
N e v a
S p a i n
V i a j e s E l
H a l c ó n V i a j e s H a l c ó n V i a j e s
H a l c ó n V i a j e s H a l c ó
n V i a j e s H a l c ó n V i a j e s
H a l c ó n V i a j e s
H a l c ó n V i a j e s
H a l c ó n V i a j e s
H a l c ó n V
i a j e s
S w e d e n
C o r t e I n g l é s
V i n g
V i n g
V i n g
C o u n t r y n o t i n c l u d e d
V i n g
V i n g
V i n g
S w i t z e r l a n d
K u o n i
K u o n i
K u o n i
K u o n i
K u o n i
K u o n i
K u o n i
K u o n i
K u o n i
K u o n
i
U K
T h o m s o n
T h o m s o n
T h o m s o n
T h o m s o n
T h o
m s o n
T h o m s o n
T h o m s o n
T h o m s o n
T h o m s o n
T h o m s
o n
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 18/62
18www.rdtrustedbrands.com
Results - the Trusted Brands
Comparison of winning brands over 10 years
C o m p a r i s o n o f w i n n i n g b r a n d
s o v e r 1 0 y e a r s
P e t r o l r e t a i l e r
2 0 1 0
2 0 0 9
2 0 0 8
2 0 0 7
2
0 0 6
2 0 0 5
2 0 0 4
2 0 0 3
2 0 0 2
2 0 0
1
A u s t r i a
O M V
O M
V
O M V
O M V
O M V
O M V
O M V
O M V
C a t e g o r y n o t i n c l u d e d
B e l g i u m
T o t a l
E s s o
S h e l l
E s s o
E s s o
S h e l l
S h e l l
S h e l l
E s s o
C z e c h
S h e l l
S h e l l
S h e l l
S h e l l
A r a l
A r a l
A r a l
A r a l
A r a l
F i n l a n d
A B C
A B
C
A B C
N e s t e
N
e s t e
N e s t e
N e s t e
N e s t e
N e s t e
F r a n c e
T o t a l
T o t a l
T o t a l
T o t a l
T o t a l
T o t a l
T o t a l
T o t a l
T o t a l
G e r m a n y
A r a l
A r a l
A r a l
A r a l
A r a l
A r a l
A r a l
A r a l
A r a l
H u n g a r y
M o l
M o l
M o l
M o l
M o l
M o l
M o l
M o l
M o l
N e t h e r l a n d s
S h e l l
S h e l l
S h e l l
S h e l l
S h e l l
S h e l l
S h e l l
S h e l l
S h e l l
P o l a n d
P K N O r l e n
P K N O r l e n
P K N O r l e n
P K N O r l e n
P K N O r l e n
P K N O r l e n
P K N O r l e n
P K N O r l e n
P K N O r l e n
P o r t u g a l
G a l p
G a
l p
G a l p
G a l p
G a l p
G a l p
G a l p
G a l p
G a l p
R o m a n i a
P e t r o m
P e t r
o m
P e t r o m
P e t r o m
C o
u n t r y n o t i n c l u d e d
R u s s i a
L u k o i l
L u k
o i l
L u k o i l
L u k o i l
L
u k o i l
T N K
T N K
N e s t e
L u k o i l
S p a i n
R e p s o l Y P F
R e p s o
l Y P F
R e p s o l Y P F
R e p s o l Y P F
R e p
s o l Y P F
R e p s o l Y P F
R e p s o l Y P F
R e p s o l Y P F
R e p s o l Y P F
S w e d e n
O K Q 8
O K Q 8
S t a t o i l C o u n t r y n o t i n c l u d e d S
t a t o i l
S t a t o i l
S w i t z e r l a n d
M i g r o l
M i g
r o l
S h e l l
S h e l l
S h e l l
S h e l l
S h e l l
S h e l l
S h e l l
U K
T e s c o
T e s
c o
T e s c o
T e s c o
T
e s c o
T e s c o
T e s c o
E s s o
E s s o
C o
u g h / c o l d r e m e d y
2 0 1 0
2 0 0 9
2 0 0 8
2 0 0 7
2
0 0 6
2 0 0 5
2 0 0 4
2 0 0 3
2 0 0 2
2 0 0
1
A u s t r i a
A s p i r i n
A s p
i r i n
A s p i r i n
A s p i r i n
A
s p i r i n
A s p i r i n
A s p i r i n
W i c k
B e l g i u m
V i c k s
V i c
k s
V i c k s
V i c k s
V
i c k s
V i c k s
V i c k s
A c t i f e d
A c t i f e d
S e d e r
g i n e
C z e c h
B r o m h e x i n
B r o m h e x i n
B r o m h e x i n
B r o m h e x i n
B r o
m h e x i n
B r o m h e x i n
B r o m h e x i n
B r o m h e x i n
B r o m h e x i n
B r o m h
e x i n
F i n l a n d
R e s i l a r
R e s
i l a r
S i l o m a t
S i l o m a t
S i l o m a t
S i l o m a t
S i l o m a t
C o d e s a n
S i l o m a t
S i l o m
a t
F r a n c e
A c t i f e d
V i c
k s
A c t i f e d
H u m e x
H
u m e x
A c t i f e d
A c t i f e d
A c t i f e d
V i c k s
A c t i f e d
G e r m a n y
W i c k
W i c k
W i c k
W i c k
W i c k
W i c k
W i c k
W i c k
W i c k
W i c
k
H u n g a r y
C o l d r e x
C o l d
r e x
N e o C i t r a n
C o l d r e x
N e o C i t r a n
C o l d r e x
C o l d r e x
C o l d r e x
C o l d r e x
C o l d
r e x
N e t h e r l a n d s
A V o g e l
A V o
g e l
A V o g e l
A V o g e l
A
V o g e l
A V o g e l
A V o g e l
A V o g e l
A V o g e l
N o w i n n e r
P o l a n d
G r i p e x
G r i p
e x
G r i p e x
G r i p e x
A s p i r
i n / G r i p e x
G r i p e x
A s p i r i n
A s p i r i n
A s p i r i n
B a y
e r
P o r t u g a l
B i s o l v o n
B i s o l v o n
B i s o l v o n
B i s o l v o n
B i s o l v o n
B i s o l v o n
B i s o l v o n
B i s o l v o n
A n t i g r i p p i n e
A n t i g r i p p i n e
R o m a n i a
N u r o f e n
N u r o
f e n
N u r o f e n
N u r o f e n
C o
u n t r y n o t i n c l u d e d
R u s s i a
T e r a f l u
C o l d
r e x
B r o m h e x i n
D r M o m
D r M o m
D r M o m
D r M o m
D r M o m
D r M o m
D r M
o m
S p a i n
F r e n a d o l
F r e n a d o l
F r e n a d o l
F r e n a d o l
F r e n a d o l
F r e n a d o l
F r e n a d o l
F r e n a d o l
F r e n a d o l
F r e n a
d o l
S w e d e n
K a n J a n g
K a n J a n g
K a n J a n g
C o u n t r y n o t i n c l u d e d
N
o s k a p i n / M o l l i p e c t
N o s k a p i n
K a n g J a n g
S w i t z e r l a n d
N e o C i t r a n
N e o C
i t r a n
N e o C i t r a n
N e o C i t r a n
N e o C i t r a n
N e o C i t r a n
N e o C i t r a n
N e o C i t r a n
N e o C i t r a n
N e o C i t r a n
U K
B e e c h a m s
B e e c h
a m s
B e e c h a m s
B e e c h a m s
B e e c h a m s
B e e c h a m s
B e n y l i n
L e m s i p
B e e c h a m s
B e e c h
a m s
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 21/62
21www.rdtrustedbrands.com
Results - the Trusted Brands
Comparison of winning brands over 10 years
C
o m p a r i s o n o f w i n n i n g b r a n d s o
v e r 1 0 y e a r s
S
k i n C a r e
2 0 1 0
2 0 0 9
2 0 0 8
2 0 0 7
2 0 0 6
2 0 0 5
2 0 0 4
2 0 0 3
2 0 0 2
2 0 0 1
A
u s t r i a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
C a t e g o r y n o t i n c l u d e d
B
e l g i u m
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
C
z e c h
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
F
i n l a n d
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
L u m e n e
L u m e n e
L u m e n e
F
r a n c e
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
G
e r m a n y
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
H
u n g a r y
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N
e t h e r l a n d s
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
P
o l a n d
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
P
o r t u g a l
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
R
o m a n i a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a C o u n t r y n o t
i n c l u d e d
R
u s s i a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
S
p a i n
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
S
w e d e n
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
C o u n t r y n o t i n c l u d e d
S
w i t z e r l a n d
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
U
K
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
N i v e a
O l a y
O l a y
O l a y
S o
a p p o w d e r
2 0 1 0
2 0 0 9
2 0 0 8
2 0 0 7
2 0 0 6
2 0 0 5
2 0 0 4
2 0 0 3
2 0 0 2
2 0 0 1
A
u s t r i a
P e r s i l
P e r s i l
P e r s i l
P e r s i l
P e r s
i l
P e r s i l
P e r s i l
P e r s i l
B
e l g i u m
D a s h
D a s h
D a s h
D a s h
D a s h
D a s h
D a s h
D a s h
D a s h
D a s h
C
z e c h
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
F
i n l a n d
O m o
O m o
O m o
O m o
O m o
O m o
O m o
O m o
O m o
O m o
F
r a n c e
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
G
e r m a n y
P e r s i l
P e r s i l
P e r s i l
P e r s i l
P e r s
i l
P e r s i l
P e r s i l
P e r s i l
P e r s i l
P e r s i l
H
u n g a r y
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
N
e t h e r l a n d s
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
P
o l a n d
V i z i r
V i z i r
V i z i r
V i z i r
V i z i r
V i z i r
V i z i r
V i z i r
V i z i r
V i z i r
P
o r t u g a l
S k i p
S k i p
S k i p
S k i p
S k i p
S k i p
S k i p
S k i p
S k i p
D o v e
R
o m a n i a
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
C o u n t r y n o t i n c l u d e d
R
u s s i a
A r i e l
T i d e
T i d e
T i d e
A r i e l
T i d e
T i d e
T i d e
A r i e l
A r i e l
S
p a i n
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
A r i e l
S
w e d e n
V i a
V i a
V i a
C o u n t r y n o t i n c l u d e d
S
w i t z e r l a n d
T o t a l
T o t a l
T o t a l
T o t a l
O m o
O m o
O m o
M i g r o s
P e r s i l
A r i e l
U
K
P e r s i l
P e r s i l
P e r s i l
P e r s i l
P e r s
i l
P e r s i l
P e r s i l
P e r s i l
P e r s i l
P e r s i l
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 22/62
22www.rdtrustedbrands.com
Results - the Trusted Brands
Comparison of winning brands over 10 years
C o m p a r i s o n o f w i n n i n g b r a n d s o v e r 1 0 y e a r s
B r e a k f a s t c e r e a l
2 0 1 0
2 0 0 9
2 0 0 8
2 0 0 7
2 0 0
6
2 0 0 5
2 0 0 4
2 0 0 3
2 0 0 2
2 0 0 1
A u s t r i a
K e l l o g g ' s
K e l l o g g ' s
K e l l o g g ' s
K e l l o g g ' s
K e l l o g
g ' s
C a t e g o r y n o t i n c l u d e d
B e l g i u m
K e l l o g g ' s
K e l l o g g ' s
K e l l o g g ' s
K e l l o g g ' s
K e l l o g
g ' s
C z e c h
O p a v i a
N e s t l é
N e s t l é
N e s t l é
N e s t l é
F i n l a n d
K e l l o g g ' s
K e l l o g g ' s
K e l l o g g ' s
K e l l o g g ' s
K e l l o g
g ' s
F r a n c e
K e l l o g g ' s
K e l l o g g ' s
K e l l o g g ' s
K e l l o g g ' s
K e l l o g
g ' s
G e r m a n y
K e l l o g g ' s
K e l l o g g ' s
K e l l o g g ' s
K e l l o g g ' s
K e l l o g
g ' s
H u n g a r y
C e r b o n a
C e r b o n a
C e r b o n a
N e s t l é
C e r b o
n a
N e t h e r l a n d s
K e l l o g g ' s
K e l l o g g ' s
K e l l o g g ' s
K e l l o g g ' s
K e l l o g
g ' s
P o l a n d
N e s t l é
N e s t l é
N e s t l é
N e s t l é
N e s t l é
P o r t u g a l
N e s t l é
N e s t l é
N e s t l é
N e s t l é
K e l l o g
g ' s
R o m a n i a
N e s t l é
N e s t l é
N e s t l é
N e s t l é
C o u n t r y n o t i n c l u d e d
R u s s i a
N e s t l é
N e s t l é
N e s t l é
N e s t l é
N e s t l é
S p a i n
K e l l o g g ' s
K e l l o g g ' s
K e l l o g g ' s
K e l l o g g ' s
K e l l o g
g ' s
S w e d e n
K e l l o g g ' s
K e l l o g g ' s
K e l l o g g ' s C o u n t r y n o t i n c l u d e d
S w i t z e r l a n d
K e l l o g g ' s
K e l l o g g ' s
K e l l o g g ' s
K e l l o g g ' s
K e l l o g
g ' s
U K
K e l l o g g ' s
K e l l o g g ' s
K e l l o g g ' s
K e l l o g g ' s
K e l l o g
g ' s
T h i s c a t e g o r y w a s i n c l u d e d i n a l l c o u n t r i e s f o r t h e f i r s t t i m e i n 2 0 0 6
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 23/62
23www.rdtrustedbrands.com
Results - the Trusted Brands
Local categories
Each country had the option of including a number of product categories in addition to the 20common categories. These categories tend to be relevant to some countries and not others, orwhere the range of brands available is most likely to be local and not known outside the country.The number of additional categories varied from 8 in Sweden to 20 in Portugal.
Across the 16 countries over 140 different product categories were included, and ranged fromyoghurt to underwear.
• 9 countries included coffee and/or tea but with 8 different winning brands
• Although chocolate/confectionery was chosen by 9 countries, the Trusted Brands are of local
origin i.e. Cadbury in the UK, Fazer in Finland
• The category featuring the most (10 countries) was pet food. Whiskas and Pedigree won in 4
countries each
• Colgate won in 3 of the 6 countries that included toothpaste
• In each of the 4 countries to include mineral water a local brand was the winner
• Local brands won in each of the 6 countries that included beer e.g. San Miguel in Spain and
Baltika in Russia
For full details of nominated brands by country and share of vote please contact your country
representative – details can be found on the final page of this book
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 24/62
24www.rdtrustedbrands.com
Local categories - 2010 winners
Austria
Category Trusted Brand Category Trusted Brand
Food Nestlé Dairy drink Campina
Milk products Nöm Yoghurt Danone
Confectionery Milka Ice-cream Ijsboerke
Soft drinks Coca-Cola Chocolate Cote D'Or
Sparkling wine Henkell Optician chain Pearle
Spirits Spitz Bathroom sanitary equipment Grohe
Clothes Vögele DIY Store Brico
Shoes Geox Liquor store Colruyt
Toothpaste Blend-A-Med Car navigation product Tomtom
Perfume Boss Energy provider Electrabel
Detergent Frosch Probiotic drink Danone
Retailer Spar Beer Jupiler
Coffee/Tea Eduscho Sauce Knorr
Electronic consumer
goods warehouse Van Den Borre
Clothing store C&A
Drugstore Di Delhaize
Hearing aid Laperre
Soy product Alpro
Czech Republic Finland
Category Trusted Brand Category Trusted Brand
Washing machine,
dishwasher etc Whirlpool Deodorant Rexona
TV station Ceska Televize Processed food Saarioinen
Creamery Mlekarna Kunin Coffee Juhla Mokka
Radio station Cesky Rozhlas Confectionery Fazer
Television set Panasonic Functional food Becel
Furniture dealer Ikea Natural product A. Vogel
Sparkling wine Bohemia Pet food Whiskas
Jeans Levi Strauss Retail chain S-ryhmäSpa/wellness Luhacovice Hotel chain Sokos Hotels
Sanitary ware Jika Furniture store Asko
Optician Instrumentarium
Custom home plan Jukka-Talo
Real estate agent Op Kiinteistökeskus
Electrical company Fortum
Shipping company/cruise line Silja Line
Spa Ikaalisten Kylpylä
Amusement park Linnanmäki
TV channel MTV3
Results - the Trusted Brands
Local categories
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 25/62
25www.rdtrustedbrands.com
Local categories - 2010 winners
France Germany
Category Trusted Brand Category Trusted Brand
Condiments & sauces Amora Food Maggi
Coffee & tea Lipton Milk products Müllermilch
Food low fat, reduced Confectionery Haribo
or anti cholesterol Danacol Soft Drinks Coca-Cola
Mineral water Evian Sparkling wines Rotkäppchen
Hair colourant L'Oréal Spirits Asbach
Cleaning product Mr Propre Clothing C&A
Pet food Friskies Shoes Rieker
Supermarket Carrefour Toothpaste Odol
Gardening Retailer Jardiland Perfume Yves Rocher
DIY Retailer Leroy Merlin Detergents Frosch
Home telephone operator France Telecom Retailer Aldi
Pet shops Jardiland Coffee / Tea Tchibo
Home energy provider EDF
Charity organisation Restos Du Coeur
Amusement park Disneyland Paris
Household battery Duracell
Fast Food Mcdonald's
Organic food Biocoop
Hungary Netherlands
Category Trusted Brand Category Trusted Brand
Mineral water Szentkirályi Diet product Becel
Soft drink Coca Cola Optician chain Hans Anders
Beer Soproni Ászok Bed Auping
Tea Lipton Bathroom sanitary equipment Grohe
Coffee Douwe Egberts Omnia Yoghurt Campina
Chocolate Milka Bike Gazelle
Milk dessert Danette Dairy drink Optimel
Frozen foods Iglo Hearing aid Beter Horen
TV station RTL Klub Clothing C&A
Television set Samsung Department store V&D
Food store Tesco Paint Histor
Deodorant Nivea Probiotic drink Yakult
Hair colour Palette Digital TV provider Ziggo
Pet food Pedigree Facial product Nivea
Underwear Triumph Heater Nefit
Soy product Alpro
Health Insurance Company CZ
Beer Heineken
Results - the Trusted Brands
Local categories
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 26/62
26www.rdtrustedbrands.com
Local categories - 2010 winners
Poland Portugal
Category Trusted Brand Category Trusted Brand
TV station TVN Chocolate Nestlé
Radio & TV sets Sony Coffee Delta
Investment fund Ing TFI Spread/Margarine Becel
Jewellery and watches Casio Cooking Oil Fula
Food producer Winiary Beer Sagres
Edible oil, margarine Kujawski Pet Food Friskies
Cakes/desserts Dr. Oetker Mineral water Luso
Juice/Mineral water Zywiec Zdroj Hair Colourant L'Oréal
Dietary supplement Naturell Fabric Conditioner Comfort
Herbal/ homeopathic remedy Herbapol Lublin Dishwasher Cleaner Sun
Dental care/mouth care Blend-A-Med Household Cleaner Sonasol
Pet food Pedigree Supermarket Continente
Hypermarket/delicatessen chain Tesco Skin Treatment Halibut
Laxative Dulcolax
Throat Analgesic Mebocaina
Health Insurance Company Multicare
Public Service Company CTT
TV Channel RTP
Small Domestic Appliances Moulinex
Non food Retailer chain Worten
Romania Russia
Category Trusted Brand Category Trusted Brand
Bakery Products Vel Pitar Anti-aging cosmetics Avon
Dairy Products Danone Beer Baltika
Meat Products Cris-Tim Canned vegetables Bonduelle
Cooking oil Untdelemn De La Bunica Cheese spread Viola
Spices Fuchs Eau de toilette / Perfume Dior
Mineral Water Borsec Eye care Visine
Pet Food Pedigree Food processor Bosch
Private Hospital Medlife Foot cream anti-varicose Lioton
Natural Food Supplements Walmark Pasta products Makfa
Toothpaste Colgate Mayonnaise sauce Calve
Commercial Center Carrefour Pet Food Whiskas
Clothing Chain store Zara Seasoning Maggi
DIY chain Bricostore Sedative drug Novopassit
Electronic & Home Appliance ChainDomo Shoe care Salamander
Construction Materials Ceresit Shower gel Nivea
Newspaper Jurnalul National Toilet paper Zewa
Radio Station Europa FM Water filter Aquaphor
TV Station Pro TV
Results - the Trusted Brands
Local categories
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 27/62
27www.rdtrustedbrands.com
Local categories - 2010 winners
Spain Sweden
Category Trusted Brand Category Trusted Brand
Powdered Milk Nestlé Coffee Gevalia
Chocolate Nestlé Pet Food Whiskas
Toothpaste Colgate Optician Synsam
Cooking sauce Gallina Blanca Mail order company Ellos
Coffee Nescafé Charitable organisation Röda Korset
Butter/margarine Tulipán Cruise company Viking Line
Pet food Pedigree Pal Detergent Ajax
Fast Food restaurant McDonald's Gardening product Gardena
Supermarket Mercadona
Optician Multiópticas
Chain Store El Corte Inglés
Car rental Company Avis
Beer San Miguel
Tyre Michelin
TV Channel Antena 3
Switzerland UK
Category Trusted Brand Category Trusted Brand
Coffee Nespresso Airline British Airways
Milk products Migros Chocolate/confectionary Cadbury
Fruit juice Granini Cruise company P&OChocolate Lindt & Sprüngli Food retailer Tesco
Confectionary Ricola Hayfever remedy Piriton
Clothing Charles Vögele Household cleaner Flash
Writing implements CARAN d'ACHE Margarine/butter Flora
Watches Swatch Mortgage lender Halifax
TV/cable provider Cablecom Optician Specsavers
Furniture / interior furnishing Ikea Pet food Whiskas
Natural remedy /homeopathy Similasan Probiotic Actimel
Toothpaste /mouth care Elmex Sun care Nivea
Houshold detergent Migros Toothpaste Colgate
Health insurance Helsana Utility company British Gas
Life insurance Swiss Life Hair colourant L'Oréal
Alcoholic spirits Gordon's
Fabric conditioner Comfort
Results - the Trusted Brands
Local categories
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 28/62
In Portugal only 50%
trust marriage
28www.rdtrustedbrands.com
This question has been reintroduced in its original form “How much trust do you have in thefollowing institutions”. NB: In 2009 respondents were asked to indicate how their trust hadchanged over the previous 5 years. For this reason the 2010 results aren’t directlycomparable with 2009.
Across the 16 participating countries only 3 institutions are trusted by >50% of thepeople questioned: Marriage, The Police, TV and Radio
Overall the most trusted institution is Marriage (68% average across all countries)
31% of people have “a great deal” of trust in Marriage Less than 1 in 3 people trust International companies Lowest levels of trust are in Government, Advertising and Politicians Trust in Politicians (as an institution) is about as low as it can be at 8%. On average 42%
of people say they don’t trust politicians at all”. At 37% trust in Banks is low; however it’s especially poor in France (17%) In Russia trust in the Police (12%) and Civil Servants (3%) is way below any other country Overall levels of trust are highest in Finland and Sweden and lowest in Russia and
Portugal
Average agreement across all countries
Trust Don't TrustRank Profession A great Quite a lot Total Not much Not at all Total
deal
1 Marriage 31% 37% 68% 21% 8% 29%2 Police 12% 47% 59% 30% 7% 37%3 TV and radio 7% 44% 52% 41% 4% 45%
4 Internet 7% 41% 49% 38% 8% 46%5 Environmentalists 8% 38% 47% 38% 10% 49%6 Press 4% 39% 43% 48% 6% 54%7 Church 13% 30% 43% 33% 21% 54%8 Legal system 6% 34% 40% 43% 12% 56%9 Banks 4% 33% 37% 45% 13% 58%10 European Union 5% 32% 37% 46% 13% 59%11 Civil servants 3% 30% 33% 51% 12% 63%12 International companies 2% 30% 32% 52% 10% 63%
13 Trade Unions 4% 28% 31% 45% 19% 64%
14 Government 3% 20% 22% 49% 26% 75%15 Advertising 1% 12% 13% 58% 25% 83%16 Politicians 1% 8% 8% 46% 42% 89%
Results - trust
Trust in institutions
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 29/62
29www.rdtrustedbrands.com
Results - trust
Trust in institutions
Trust in TV and Radio differs significantly by country, highest in the Nordic countries lowest in France (33%) In Sweden TV & Radio are trusted more than Marriage and the Police Trust in the media (TV & Radio + the press) is lowest in Russia
1 out of 4 people have no trust at all in their Government, most notable in Hungary (53%) and Spain (46%) More than 2 out of 3 people don’t trust Politicians in Czech, Hungary, Poland and Romania.
Have no trust at all in their government or politicians
Trust TV and radio
(a great deal/quite a lot)
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 30/62
30www.rdtrustedbrands.com
Results - trust
Trust in institutions
Trust in the internet ranges from 23% in Germany to 77% in the *Czech Republic and 72% in *Poland.
Note: *These 2 countries conducted their fieldwork on-line and, in this instance, the profile of respondents is
likely to have influenced their positive response
Trust the internet
(a great deal/quite a lot)
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 31/62
31www.rdtrustedbrands.com
Results - trust
Trust in institutions
Comparison with 2001 – average agreement across 14 countries*
9 of the 16 institutions were also included in the original 2001 study. 14 countries were common to both years.The question about “Government” was added in 2002.
Overall levels of trust have fallen over the past 9 years Only the Police and Trade Unions have gained trust Trust in advertising has decreased the most, by 37% (from 17% to 11%) Trust in Government has fallen since 2002 by 1/3 (from 35% to 23%) At 36%, trust in the European Union is 10% lower than in 2001 Confidence in the press has reduced from 48% to 42%
*Average across all (14) countries excludes Austria and Romania which were not included in 2001 and 2002
Trust in institution Great deal/quite a lot Not much/none at all
2010 2002 2001 2010 2002 2001
Marriage 66% 74% 71% 30% 24% 26%
Police 59% 58% 54% 37% 41% 43%
The Press 42% - 48% 48% - 50%
Church 41% 48% 43% 56% 50% 54%
European Union 36% 42% 40% 60% 52% 56%
Trade Unions 32% 33% 29% 63% 65% 68%
International companies 31% 40% 41% 64% 56% 55%
Government 23% 35% - 74% 62% -
Advertising 11% - 17% 78% - 80%
Low trust in their government
(not much/not at all)
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 32/62
32www.rdtrustedbrands.com
Results - trust
Trust in institutions
Trust the police
(great deal/quite a lot)
84% of Russians
don’t trust the
police
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 33/62
33www.rdtrustedbrands.com
Results - trust
Trust in institutions
R e s p o n d e n t s a g r e e i n g - a g r e a t d e a l / q u i t e a l o t
T o t a l
2 0 1 0
9 0 8
1 9 7 3
2 8 8 6
1 3 3 8
2 0 5 0
7 9 1 9
3 1 9 1
2 1 0 6
9 2 0
9 8 4
9 9 0
1 6 6 0
4 8 3
1 3 6 4
1 3 3 6
2 0
5 5
M a r r i a g e
6 8 %
7 3 %
6 0 %
7 1 %
7 3 %
5 5 %
7 1 %
7 0 %
7 3 %
7 0 %
5 0 %
7 9 %
5 4 %
6 3 %
7 3 %
6 9 %
7 6
%
P o l i c e
5 9 %
7 8 %
5 4 %
4 6 %
9 0 %
4 8 %
7 7 %
5 1 %
6 1 %
4 9 %
4 6 %
3 5 %
1 2 %
7 4 %
7 6 %
7 4 %
6 8
%
T V a n d r a d i o
5 2 %
5 3 %
5 3 %
5 8 %
8 6 %
3 3 %
5 6 %
3 4 %
5 5 %
5 2 %
4 8 %
4 7 %
2 4 %
4 5 %
8 1 %
6 5 %
4 2
%
I n t e r n e t
4 9 %
3 4 %
5 1 %
7 7 %
4 2 %
3 5 %
2 3 %
6 3 %
6 6 %
7 2 %
3 5 %
6 5 %
3 5 %
4 6 %
4 0 %
3 5 %
5 7
%
E n v i r o n m e n t a l i s t s
4 7 %
6 5 %
4 6 %
3 6 %
2 3 %
4 5 %
5 6 %
5 2 %
4 0 %
4 6 %
3 7 %
6 4 %
4 6 %
4 6 %
4 1 %
5 7 %
4 5
%
P r e s s
4 3 %
4 2 %
4 4 %
4 8 %
6 8 %
3 6 %
4 5 %
3 4 %
4 5 %
5 4 %
3 5 %
3 5 %
1 7 %
5 4 %
5 9 %
4 6 %
2 3
%
C h u r c h
4 3 %
3 7 %
2 7 %
1 4 %
6 5 %
2 4 %
4 0 %
3 4 %
3 6 %
4 2 %
4 2 %
7 0 %
5 6 %
4 7 %
5 4 %
4 3 %
5 3
%
L e g a l s y s t e m
4 0 %
5 9 %
2 6 %
2 5 %
7 6 %
3 1 %
4 6 %
3 7 %
5 2 %
3 0 %
1 2 %
2 2 %
1 9 %
3 1 %
6 0 %
6 1 %
5 0
%
B a n k s
3 7 %
3 6 %
3 2 %
5 4 %
7 4 %
1 7 %
2 2 %
2 5 %
3 7 %
4 9 %
2 6 %
4 3 %
3 3 %
2 4 %
5 6 %
3 8 %
3 0
%
E u r o p e a n U n i o n
3 7 %
2 9 %
4 0 %
3 9 %
3 0 %
3 0 %
2 8 %
4 8 %
3 4 %
5 8 %
3 9 %
6 0 %
2 4 %
5 4 %
3 8 %
2 4 %
2 0
%
C i v i l s e r v a n t s
3 3 %
5 0 %
3 1 %
1 8 %
4 9 %
3 9 %
3 4 %
3 3 %
2 9 %
3 3 %
2 9 %
2 4 %
3 %
3 0 %
3 7 %
4 7 %
3 5
%
I n t e r n a t i o n a l c o m p a n i e s
3 2 %
3 4 %
3 6 %
3 2 %
3 5 %
2 2 %
2 0 %
3 2 %
4 5 %
2 7 %
2 6 %
4 7 %
2 2 %
3 2 %
3 6 %
4 1 %
2 8
%
T r a d e U n i o n s
3 1 %
3 3 %
3 9 %
3 2 %
5 4 %
2 6 %
3 1 %
1 9 %
4 9 %
3 1 %
1 7 %
2 3 %
2 6 %
1 8 %
3 6 %
3 8 %
3 1
%
G o v e r n m e n t
2 2 %
2 1 %
1 4 %
1 3 %
4 2 %
1 8 %
2 3 %
1 4 %
2 7 %
1 3 %
1 3 %
1 1 %
2 9 %
1 1 %
4 6 %
4 3 %
1 5
%
A d v e r t i s i n g
1 3 %
1 2 %
1 5 %
1 1 %
1 1 %
1 1 %
6 %
9 %
1 2 %
2 3 %
1 2 %
2 7 %
5 %
1 5 %
1 3 %
1 6 %
1 6
%
P o l i t i c i a n s
8 %
7 %
7 %
1 %
1 3 %
7 %
9 %
1 %
1 7 %
3 %
3 %
3 %
4 %
4 %
2 0 %
2 6 %
5 %
UK
Switzerland
Sweden
Spain
Russia
Romania
Portugal
Poland
Netherlands
Hungary
Germany
France
Finland
Czech
Belgium
Austria
Average allcountries
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 34/62
34www.rdtrustedbrands.com
Results - trust
Trust in institutions
R e s p o n d e n t s a g r e e i n g - n o t v e r y m u c h / n o t a t a l l
T o t a l
2 0 1 0
9 0 8
1 9 7 3
2 8 8 6
1 3 3 8
2 0 5 0
7 9 1 9
3 1 9 1
2 1 0 6
9 2 0
9 8 4
9 9 0
1 6 6 0
4 8 3
1 3 6 4
1 3 3 6
2 0
5 5
P o l i t i c i a n s
8 9 %
9 1 %
9 2 %
9 7 %
8 6 %
9 2 %
8 9 %
9 8 %
8 2 %
9 7 %
7 2 %
9 4 %
9 1 %
9 4 %
7 8 %
7 1 %
9 4
%
A d v e r t i s i n g
8 3 %
8 6 %
8 4 %
8 8 %
8 7 %
8 8 %
9 3 %
9 0 %
8 6 %
7 7 %
6 3 %
6 9 %
9 1 %
8 3 %
8 5 %
8 1 %
8 3
%
G o v e r n m e n t
7 5 %
7 8 %
8 5 %
8 6 %
5 6 %
8 2 %
7 5 %
8 5 %
7 1 %
8 7 %
6 1 %
8 5 %
6 8 %
8 7 %
5 3 %
5 4 %
8 5
%
T r a d e U n i o n s
6 4 %
6 2 %
5 8 %
6 6 %
4 2 %
7 4 %
6 4 %
7 9 %
5 0 %
6 9 %
5 4 %
7 2 %
7 0 %
7 8 %
5 6 %
5 7 %
6 7
%
I n t e r n a t i o n a l c o m p a n i e s
6 3 %
6 1 %
6 2 %
6 7 %
6 1 %
7 7 %
7 5 %
6 6 %
5 3 %
7 3 %
4 5 %
4 6 %
7 3 %
6 4 %
5 4 %
5 4 %
7 0
%
C i v i l s e r v a n t s
6 3 %
4 6 %
6 7 %
8 1 %
4 7 %
6 0 %
6 2 %
6 5 %
6 9 %
6 7 %
4 3 %
7 0 %
9 3 %
6 5 %
5 4 %
4 8 %
6 3
%
E u r o p e a n U n i o n
5 9 %
7 0 %
5 9 %
5 9 %
6 8 %
6 9 %
6 9 %
5 1 %
6 5 %
4 2 %
3 5 %
3 6 %
7 0 %
4 3 %
6 0 %
7 3 %
7 9
%
B a n k s
5 8 %
6 0 %
6 6 %
4 5 %
2 2 %
8 2 %
7 4 %
7 3 %
6 1 %
5 1 %
4 6 %
5 3 %
6 3 %
7 1 %
3 6 %
5 7 %
6 8
%
L e g a l s y s t e m
5 6 %
3 7 %
7 3 %
7 3 %
2 1 %
6 8 %
5 0 %
6 1 %
4 7 %
7 0 %
6 0 %
7 3 %
7 8 %
6 3 %
3 2 %
3 4 %
4 8
%
C h u r c h
5 4 %
6 1 %
7 1 %
8 5 %
3 4 %
7 6 %
5 8 %
6 4 %
6 3 %
5 8 %
3 3 %
2 7 %
4 0 %
5 0 %
4 5 %
5 4 %
4 6
%
P r e s s
5 4 %
5 7 %
5 4 %
5 1 %
3 1 %
6 3 %
5 3 %
6 5 %
5 3 %
4 6 %
4 0 %
6 1 %
7 9 %
4 3 %
3 9 %
5 1 %
7 6
%
E n v i r o n m e n t a l i s t s
4 9 %
3 1 %
5 2 %
6 3 %
7 2 %
5 4 %
4 0 %
4 6 %
5 8 %
5 4 %
3 5 %
3 1 %
5 0 %
5 1 %
5 0 %
3 9 %
5 3
%
I n t e r n e t
4 6 %
6 0 %
4 7 %
2 1 %
5 4 %
6 4 %
7 1 %
3 5 %
3 2 %
2 8 %
3 5 %
2 9 %
6 1 %
4 7 %
4 9 %
6 0 %
4 2
%
T V a n d r a d i o
4 5 %
4 6 %
4 6 %
4 1 %
1 3 %
6 6 %
4 2 %
6 6 %
4 4 %
4 8 %
2 8 %
5 0 %
7 2 %
5 1 %
1 8 %
3 3 %
5 7
%
P o l i c e
3 7 %
1 9 %
4 5 %
5 3 %
6 %
5 1 %
2 0 %
4 7 %
3 7 %
5 1 %
2 6 %
6 2 %
8 4 %
2 3 %
1 5 %
2 2 %
3 1
%
M a r r i a g e
2 9 %
2 5 %
3 9 %
2 8 %
2 5 %
4 4 %
2 6 %
2 9 %
2 6 %
3 0 %
2 5 %
1 8 %
4 1 %
3 3 %
2 5 %
2 7 %
2 3
%
UK
Switzerland
Sweden
Spain
Russia
Romania
Portugal
Poland
Netherlands
Hungary
Germany
France
Finland
Czech
Belgium
Austria
Average allcountries
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 35/62
35www.rdtrustedbrands.com
Results - Trust
Trust in professions
NB: The Police and Politicians were also included in the survey under the heading ofInstitutions (see Trust in Institutions). Results are similar but not identical, the table above(professions) summarises respondents opinions about “the role” rather than “the institution”.
Overall trust in these professions is significantly higher than trust in institutions As in previous years, Fire fighters and Airline pilots are the most trusted professions (92%
and 88% respectively) However, 53% of people trust Fire fighters “a great deal” v 41% for Airline Pilots The medical professions (pharmacists, nurses and doctors) are also regarded highly Trust in the Police (profession) averages 62% (v 59% the Police as an institution) Average trust in priests/church ministers is on par with judges and taxi drivers Trust in Politicians (profession) is lowest at 8% Financial advisors and journalists are amongst the least trusted professions earning the
trust of less than 1 in 3 people
Average agreement across all countries
Trust Don't Trust
Rank Profession A great Quite a lot Total Not much Not at all Totaldeal
1 Fire fighters 53% 40% 92% 3% 0% 4%2 Airline pilots 41% 47% 88% 7% 2% 9%3 Pharmacists 27% 58% 85% 10% 1% 11%4 Nurses 30% 54% 84% 12% 1% 13%5 Doctors 26% 56% 82% 14% 1% 16%6 Teachers 17% 59% 76% 18% 2% 20%7 Farmers 19% 56% 75% 18% 3% 20%8 Police 16% 47% 62% 28% 7% 35%9 Meteorologists 8% 48% 57% 34% 5% 39%
10 Judges 8% 39% 47% 38% 10% 48%11 Taxi drivers 5% 41% 47% 39% 10% 50%12 Priests/church ministers 12% 35% 46% 32% 18% 50%
13 Lawyers 6% 38% 43% 44% 9% 52%14 Travel agents 2% 35% 37% 49% 9% 59%
15 Financial advisors 3% 27% 29% 53% 13% 66%16 Journalists 2% 25% 27% 54% 14% 68%17 Trade union leaders 2% 21% 23% 46% 25% 72%18 Football players 2% 17% 19% 45% 31% 76%19 Car salesmen 1% 15% 15% 60% 21% 81%20 Politicians 1% 7% 8% 46% 43% 89%
Trust firefighters
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 36/62
36www.rdtrustedbrands.com
Results - trust
Trust in professions
Comparison with 2002 – average agreement across 14 countries*
This question didn’t appear in the original 2001 study. However 11 of the 14 professionsincluded in 2002 were included in 2010. 14 countries were common to both years, only
Austria and Romania were excluded in 2002
Across the 14 countries trust in every profession, apart from teachers, has fallen Even doctors, nurses and pharmacists are trusted slightly less than 8 years ago Trust in pharmacists has fallen quite significantly in Russia (-27%) Trust in politicians has dropped by 41% (from a low average of 14% to an even lower
8%) 89% don’t trust politicians, only Portugal shows an improvement over 2002 (72% v 91%) 81% don’t trust car salesmen, 5% more than in 2002. The lowest level of trust is in
France (92%)
Airline pilots 87% 89% 10% 9%
Nurses 85% 88% 12% 11%
Pharmacists 85% 89% 12% 10%
Doctors 82% 84% 16% 15%
Teachers 77% 76% 19% 23%Taxi drivers 47% 56% 49% 42%
Lawyers 43% 49% 52% 50%
Travel agents 37% 41% 59% 56%
Financial advisors 29% 34% 66% 63%
Car salesmen 15% 21% 81% 77%
Politicians 8% 14% 89% 85%
Trust in profession Great deal/quite a lot Not much/not at all
2010 2002 2010 2002
Trust pharmacists
(great deal/quite a lot)
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 37/62
37www.rdtrustedbrands.com
Results - trust and brands
Criteria of trust
Results - trust
Trust in professions
Don’t trust car salesmen
Don’t trust politicians
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 38/62
38www.rdtrustedbrands.com
Results - Trust
Trust in professions
R e s p o n d e n t s a g r e e i n g - a g r e a
t d e a l / q u i t e a l o t
T o t a l
2 0 1 0
9 0 8
1 9 7 3
2 8 8 6
1 3 3 8
2 0 5 0
7 9 1 9
3 1 9 1
2 1 0 6
9 2 0
9 8 4
9 9 0
1 6 6 0
4 8 3
1 3 6 4
1 3 3 6
2 0
5 5
F i r e f i g h t e r s
9 2 %
9 6 %
9 5 %
9 7 %
9 4 %
9 6 %
9 4 %
9 6 %
9 6 %
9 7 %
7 5 %
8 9 %
8 4 %
9 0 %
9 1 %
9 2 %
9 6 %
A i r l i n e p i l o t s
8 8 %
9 4 %
8 4 %
8 8 %
9 5 %
8 6 %
9 2 %
9 0 %
8 8 %
8 2 %
7 5 %
9 0 %
7 5 %
9 4 %
9 1 %
9 2 %
9 1 %
N u r s e s
8 4 %
9 4 %
9 0 %
9 0 %
9 3 %
9 1 %
9 2 %
7 6 %
9 3 %
7 5 %
7 1 %
6 0 %
5 6 %
9 1 %
9 3 %
9 3 %
9 2 %
P h a r m a c i s t s
8 5 %
9 1 %
9 4 %
8 1 %
9 3 %
8 6 %
8 7 %
8 7 %
8 7 %
7 8 %
7 3 %
8 4 %
5 8 %
9 0 %
8 7 %
8 9 %
9 4 %
D o c t o r s
8 2 %
9 0 %
9 0 %
8 8 %
9 1 %
8 6 %
8 4 %
7 3 %
8 9 %
6 3 %
7 0 %
7 4 %
5 4 %
8 9 %
9 0 %
8 9 %
8 8 %
F a r m e r s
7 5 %
8 7 %
7 4 %
7 3 %
7 9 %
7 0 %
7 5 %
6 4 %
8 5 %
6 3 %
6 1 %
6 6 %
7 9 %
8 0 %
7 7 %
8 0 %
8 6 %
T e a c h e r s
7 6 %
6 5 %
8 2 %
8 1 %
8 7 %
6 9 %
6 3 %
7 7 %
8 4 %
7 3 %
6 3 %
7 5 %
7 9 %
8 5 %
7 3 %
7 1 %
8 7 %
P o l i c e
6 2 %
8 2 %
5 8 %
4 9 %
9 2 %
5 0 %
8 0 %
5 5 %
6 4 %
5 2 %
5 0 %
3 5 %
1 8 %
7 9 %
8 5 %
7 8 %
7 2 %
M e t e o r o l o g i s t s
5 7 %
6 3 %
6 0 %
6 3 %
6 7 %
4 5 %
5 8 %
6 7 %
5 5 %
5 2 %
4 9 %
6 6 %
2 6 %
6 9 %
5 6 %
5 6 %
5 4 %
J u d g e s
4 7 %
7 4 %
3 4 %
3 6 %
6 8 %
4 0 %
6 0 %
5 2 %
5 7 %
4 0 %
2 3 %
2 5 %
3 0 %
4 0 %
6 7 %
6 0 %
5 2 %
T a x i d r i v e r s
4 7 %
5 6 %
4 8 %
1 0 %
7 9 %
4 1 %
5 6 %
4 0 %
3 1 %
4 5 %
3 1 %
3 3 %
5 1 %
6 1 %
5 5 %
5 7 %
5 3 %
L a w y e r s
4 3 %
5 7 %
3 5 %
4 5 %
5 4 %
3 9 %
5 1 %
4 0 %
4 6 %
4 0 %
1 6 %
3 1 %
4 6 %
3 7 %
5 1 %
5 1 %
4 9 %
P r i e s t s / c h u r c h m i n i s t e r s
4 6 %
5 4 %
2 9 %
1 7 %
6 9 %
3 0 %
5 1 %
4 0 %
4 0 %
3 4 %
3 6 %
5 8 %
5 9 %
5 0 %
6 1 %
5 5 %
5 9 %
T r a v e l a g e n t s
3 7 %
4 3 %
4 6 %
3 3 %
5 3 %
2 9 %
2 5 %
3 2 %
3 5 %
3 6 %
2 3 %
3 7 %
2 5 %
4 5 %
4 4 %
4 9 %
4 3 %
F i n a n c i a l a d v i s o r s
2 9 %
2 1 %
2 7 %
4 1 %
2 6 %
1 8 %
1 6 %
3 1 %
2 1 %
3 2 %
1 6 %
3 9 %
3 8 %
3 4 %
4 1 %
2 7 %
4 1 %
J o u r n a l i s t s
2 7 %
2 4 %
3 1 %
2 8 %
2 6 %
2 3 %
2 6 %
2 2 %
3 3 %
4 1 %
2 2 %
3 0 %
1 4 %
3 2 %
2 8 %
2 8 %
2 0 %
T r a d e u n i o n l e a d e r s
2 4 %
2 5 %
3 2 %
2 5 %
3 4 %
1 9 %
2 3 %
1 8 %
3 9 %
1 7 %
1 3 %
2 0 %
1 9 %
1 3 %
2 8 %
3 0 %
2 2 %
F o o t b a l l p l a y e r s
1 9 %
1 7 %
1 3 %
1 3 %
2 8 %
1 1 %
1 2 %
1 5 %
1 7 %
1 8 %
1 2 %
2 2 %
5 3 %
1 9 %
3 3 %
1 9 %
9
%
C a r s a l e s m e n
1 5 %
1 4 %
1 8 %
2 3 %
1 9 %
7 %
1 1 %
1 9 %
1 6 %
1 6 %
7 %
1 7 %
1 7 %
2 0 %
1 5 %
2 0 %
8
%
P o l i t i c i a n s
8 %
1 0 %
7 %
1 %
1 0 %
6 %
1 0 %
2 %
1 6 %
2 %
3 %
4 %
5 %
5 %
2 0 %
2 0 %
7
%
UK
Switzerland
Sweden
Spain
Russia
Romania
Portugal
Poland
Netherlands
Hungary
Germany
France
Finland
Czech
Belgium
Austria
Average allcountries
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 39/62
39www.rdtrustedbrands.com
Results - Trust
Trust in professions
R e s p o n d e n t s a g r e e i n g - n o t v e
r y m u c h / n o t a t a l l
T o t a l
2 0 1 0
9 0 8
1 9 7 3
2 8 8 6
1 3 3 8
2 0 5 0
7 9 1 9
3 1 9 1
2 1 0 6
9 2 0
9 8 4
9 9 0
1 6 6 0
4 8 3
1 3 6 4
1 3 3 6
2 0
5 5
P o l i t i c i a n s
8 9 %
8 9 %
9 2 %
9 8 %
8 8 %
9 4 %
8 7 %
9 7 %
8 3 %
9 8 %
7 2 %
9 3 %
9 2 %
9 2 %
7 8 %
7 6 %
9 2 %
C a r s a l e s m e n
8 1 %
8 2 %
8 1 %
7 6 %
7 8 %
9 2 %
8 6 %
7 9 %
8 3 %
8 4 %
6 8 %
7 8 %
7 9 %
7 7 %
8 2 %
7 6 %
9 0 %
F o o t b a l l p l a y e r s
7 6 %
8 0 %
8 5 %
8 5 %
6 9 %
8 7 %
8 5 %
8 3 %
8 2 %
8 2 %
6 2 %
7 3 %
4 2 %
7 8 %
6 5 %
7 6 %
8 9 %
T r a d e u n i o n l e a d e r s
7 2 %
7 0 %
6 6 %
7 3 %
6 3 %
8 0 %
7 3 %
8 0 %
5 9 %
8 3 %
6 1 %
7 4 %
7 7 %
8 1 %
6 5 %
6 4 %
7 7 %
J o u r n a l i s t s
6 8 %
7 2 %
6 7 %
7 1 %
7 0 %
7 6 %
6 9 %
7 7 %
6 5 %
5 9 %
5 1 %
6 5 %
8 3 %
6 1 %
6 4 %
6 6 %
7 8 %
F i n a n c i a l a d v i s o r s
6 6 %
7 4 %
7 1 %
5 7 %
7 0 %
8 1 %
7 9 %
6 8 %
7 7 %
6 8 %
5 5 %
5 6 %
5 8 %
6 0 %
5 1 %
6 7 %
5 8 %
T r a v e l a g e n t s
5 9 %
5 5 %
5 2 %
6 5 %
4 4 %
7 0 %
7 2 %
6 7 %
6 3 %
6 4 %
5 2 %
5 8 %
7 1 %
5 0 %
5 4 %
4 8 %
5 6 %
P r i e s t s / c h u r c h m i n i s t e r s
5 0 %
4 4 %
6 9 %
8 2 %
2 9 %
6 9 %
4 6 %
5 8 %
5 8 %
6 6 %
4 0 %
3 9 %
3 8 %
4 8 %
3 7 %
4 2 %
4 0 %
L a w y e r s
5 2 %
3 9 %
6 3 %
5 3 %
4 2 %
6 0 %
4 5 %
5 9 %
5 2 %
6 0 %
5 8 %
6 4 %
5 1 %
5 6 %
4 2 %
4 3 %
4 9 %
T a x i d r i v e r s
5 0 %
4 3 %
4 8 %
8 9 %
1 8 %
5 7 %
4 1 %
5 8 %
6 7 %
5 5 %
4 5 %
6 3 %
4 5 %
3 6 %
4 4 %
3 9 %
4 5 %
J u d g e s
4 8 %
2 2 %
6 4 %
6 3 %
2 8 %
5 9 %
3 6 %
4 7 %
4 2 %
6 0 %
5 1 %
7 0 %
6 7 %
5 3 %
2 6 %
3 5 %
4 6 %
M e t e o r o l o g i s t s
3 9 %
3 3 %
3 8 %
3 6 %
2 9 %
5 3 %
3 7 %
3 1 %
4 3 %
4 8 %
2 6 %
2 9 %
7 1 %
2 6 %
3 6 %
3 9 %
4 4 %
P o l i c e
3 5 %
1 6 %
4 1 %
5 0 %
6 %
4 9 %
1 8 %
4 4 %
3 4 %
4 8 %
2 6 %
6 1 %
7 9 %
1 9 %
1 4 %
2 0 %
2 8 %
T e a c h e r s
2 0 %
3 2 %
1 7 %
1 8 %
9 %
3 1 %
3 2 %
2 2 %
1 4 %
2 7 %
1 3 %
2 1 %
1 9 %
1 0 %
1 9 %
2 4 %
1 2 %
F a r m e r s
2 0 %
1 0 %
2 4 %
2 5 %
1 8 %
2 9 %
2 0 %
3 5 %
1 3 %
3 7 %
1 3 %
2 8 %
1 7 %
1 3 %
1 5 %
1 5 %
1 3 %
D o c t o r s
1 6 %
9 %
9 %
1 1 %
7 %
1 3 %
1 4 %
2 6 %
1 0 %
3 7 %
8 %
2 4 %
4 4 %
9 %
9 %
9 %
1 1 %
N u r s e s
1 3 %
4 %
8 %
9 %
6 %
8 %
6 %
2 3 %
6 %
2 5 %
7 %
3 6 %
4 1 %
7 %
6 %
4 %
7
%
P h a r m a c i s t s
1 1 %
6 %
5 %
1 8 %
4 %
1 3 %
1 0 %
1 2 %
1 2 %
2 2 %
5 %
1 2 %
3 9 %
4 %
6 %
7 %
5
%
A i r l i n e p i l o t s
9 %
4 %
1 4 %
1 1 %
3 %
1 3 %
6 %
8 %
1 1 %
1 8 %
4 %
7 %
2 2 %
4 %
6 %
5 %
8
%
F i r e f i g h t e r s
4 %
1 %
4 %
2 %
2 %
3 %
2 %
3 %
3 %
3 %
3 %
5 %
1 4 %
4 %
2 %
4 %
3
%
UK
Switzerland
Sweden
Spain
Russia
Romania
Portugal
Poland
Netherlands
Hungary
Germany
France
Finland
Czech
Belgium
Austria
Average allcountries
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 40/62
40www.rdtrustedbrands.com
Results - trust
Trust in family and friends
Trust in friends and family across Europe is high Whilst people trust their family “a great deal”, they’re more likely to trust their friends
“quite a lot” On average 39% don’t trust their neighbours In France, Poland and Portugal less than half trust their work colleagues Trust in neighbours is low (<50%) in Czech Republic, France, Poland, Portugal, Romania
and Russia Although less than half trust their boss this question wasn’t applicable to 13% of people
NB numbers don’t add up to 100% because not everyone answered this question
Average agreement across all countries
Trust Don't Trust A great Quite a lot Total Not much Not at all Total Not applicable
deal
Family 66% 26% 92% 5% 1% 5% 1%
Friends 42% 47% 89% 7% 1% 8% 1%
Work colleagues 9% 48% 57% 25% 4% 29% 9%
Neighbours 9% 48% 56% 33% 6% 39% 2%
Boss 10% 38% 48% 25% 9% 34% 13%
Trust family
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 41/62
41www.rdtrustedbrands.com
Results - trust
Trust in family and friends
Trust neighbours and work colleagues
67% in Poland
don’t trust their
neighbours
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 42/62
42www.rdtrustedbrands.com
R e s p o n d e n t s a g r e e i n g :
T o t a l
2 0 1 0
9 0 8
1 9 7 3
2 8 8 6
1 3 3 8
2 0 5 0
7 9 1 9
3 1 9 1
2 1 0 6
9 2 0
9 8 4
9 9 0
1 6 6 0
4 8 3
1 3 6 4
1 3 3 6
2 0 5 5
A g r e a t d e a l
F a m i l y
6 6 %
7 4 %
4 4 %
8 0 %
8 2 %
4 1 %
6 9 %
7 8 %
4 9 %
5 2 %
5 4 %
7 6 %
7 0 %
7 3 %
6 1 %
7 1 %
7 5 %
F r i e n d s
4 2 %
4 9 %
3 4 %
4 5 %
5 0 %
3 3 %
4 0 %
4 7 %
4 3 %
3 2 %
3 4 %
2 8 %
3 8 %
4 2 %
4 8 %
4 9 %
5 6 %
B o s s
1 0 %
1 4 %
7 %
9 %
1 4 %
4 %
9 %
1 1 %
7 %
8 %
7 %
9 %
1 0 %
8 %
1 5 %
1 1 %
1 3 %
N e i g h b o u r s
9 %
1 1 %
9 %
5 %
1 2 %
4 %
9 %
9 %
1 6 %
2 %
8 %
5 %
4 %
6 %
1 3 %
1 1 %
1 7 %
W o r k c o l l e a g u e s
9 %
9 %
7 %
9 %
1 4 %
4 %
6 %
1 0 %
8 %
2 %
5 %
7 %
8 %
1 3 %
1 6 %
8 %
1 3 %
Q u i t e a l o t
W o r k c o l l e a g u e s
4 8 %
5 0 %
4 8 %
5 2 %
5 3 %
3 5 %
4 5 %
4 9 %
5 5 %
3 5 %
3 7 %
4 7 %
5 3 %
5 5 %
5 4 %
5 2 %
4 9 %
N e i g h b o u r s
4 8 %
6 1 %
5 3 %
4 3 %
5 3 %
3 5 %
5 4 %
4 8 %
5 4 %
2 7 %
3 4 %
3 9 %
4 4 %
5 1 %
5 7 %
5 7 %
5 5 %
F r i e n d s
4 7 %
4 4 %
5 2 %
4 8 %
4 3 %
5 3 %
5 1 %
4 3 %
5 0 %
5 8 %
3 8 %
5 1 %
5 0 %
4 9 %
4 5 %
4 3 %
3 9 %
B o s s
3 8 %
3 6 %
3 9 %
3 9 %
4 7 %
2 7 %
3 1 %
3 6 %
4 8 %
3 0 %
3 0 %
3 5 %
4 3 %
4 5 %
4 1 %
4 1 %
3 4 %
F a m i l y
2 6 %
2 0 %
4 2 %
1 6 %
1 4 %
4 4 %
2 4 %
1 8 %
4 0 %
3 7 %
2 5 %
2 0 %
2 5 %
2 5 %
3 1 %
2 2 %
2 0 %
G r e a t d e a l / q u i t e a l o t
F a m i l y
9 2 %
9 4 %
8 5 %
9 6 %
9 6 %
8 5 %
9 3 %
9 5 %
8 9 %
9 0 %
7 9 %
9 6 %
9 6 %
9 8 %
9 2 %
9 2 %
9 5 %
F r i e n d s
8 9 %
9 3 %
8 6 %
9 3 %
9 3 %
8 7 %
9 1 %
9 0 %
9 2 %
8 9 %
7 2 %
7 9 %
8 8 %
9 1 %
9 3 %
9 2 %
9 4 %
W o r k c o l l e a g u e s
5 7 %
5 9 %
5 4 %
6 1 %
6 7 %
3 9 %
5 1 %
5 9 %
6 3 %
3 8 %
4 2 %
5 4 %
6 2 %
6 8 %
7 0 %
6 0 %
6 2 %
N e i g h b o u r s
5 6 %
7 2 %
6 2 %
4 8 %
6 4 %
3 9 %
6 2 %
5 7 %
7 1 %
2 9 %
4 2 %
4 5 %
4 7 %
5 7 %
6 9 %
6 7 %
7 1 %
B o s s
4 8 %
5 0 %
4 6 %
4 9 %
6 0 %
3 1 %
4 1 %
4 7 %
5 5 %
3 8 %
3 7 %
4 4 %
5 4 %
5 3 %
5 7 %
5 2 %
4 7 %
N o t v e r y m u c h / n o t a t a l l
N e i g h b o u r s
3 9 %
2 5 %
3 5 %
4 8 %
3 3 %
5 7 %
3 4 %
4 1 %
2 7 %
6 7 %
3 9 %
5 0 %
4 9 %
4 2 %
2 7 %
2 8 %
2 6 %
B o s s
3 4 %
2 2 %
4 0 %
3 5 %
2 6 %
5 5 %
2 9 %
3 5 %
2 8 %
4 7 %
3 7 %
3 4 %
4 0 %
3 9 %
2 5 %
2 5 %
2 6 %
W o r k c o l l e a g u e s
2 9 %
2 3 %
3 3 %
2 8 %
2 3 %
4 9 %
2 9 %
2 6 %
2 0 %
5 3 %
3 4 %
3 3 %
3 3 %
2 5 %
1 7 %
2 4 %
1 7 %
F r i e n d s
8 %
4 %
1 2 %
5 %
6 %
1 2 %
6 %
8 %
5 %
9 %
1 1 %
1 7 %
9 %
7 %
6 %
4 %
4
%
F a m i l y
5 %
4 %
1 2 %
2 %
2 %
1 3 %
4 %
3 %
9 %
1 0 %
4 %
2 %
3 %
2 %
7 %
3 %
3
%
N o t a p p l i c a b l e
B o s s
1 3 %
2 1 %
9 %
1 4 %
1 0 %
1 1 %
2 5 %
1 5 %
1 4 %
1 5 %
0 %
1 9 %
3 %
0 %
1 4 %
1 6 %
2 2 %
W o r k c o l l e a g u e s
9 %
1 3 %
8 %
9 %
7 %
9 %
1 6 %
1 2 %
1 4 %
9 %
0 %
9 %
2 %
0 %
1 1 %
1 0 %
1 8 %
N e i g h b o u r s
2 %
1 %
2 %
2 %
2 %
3 %
1 %
1 %
1 %
4 %
0 %
3 %
2 %
0 %
2 %
1 %
1
%
F r i e n d s
1 %
0 %
0 %
0 %
1 %
1 %
1 %
1 %
1 %
2 %
0 %
2 %
1 %
0 %
1 %
0 %
1
%
F a m i l y
1 %
0 %
1 %
0 %
1 %
1 %
1 %
1 %
1 %
0 %
0 %
1 %
0 %
0 %
0 %
1 %
1
%
UK
Switzerland
Sweden
Spain
Russia
Romania
Portugal
Poland
Netherlands
Hungary
Germany
France
Finland
Czech
Belgium
Austria
Average allcountries
Results - trust
Trust in family and friends
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 43/62
43www.rdtrustedbrands.com
R e s p o n s e r a t e b y c o u n t r y 2 0 1 0 v 2 0 0 9
C o u n t r y
2 0 1 0
2 0 0 9
N u m b e r
T a r g e t
N u m b e r
N o . A
n a l y s e d
N u m b e r
T a r g e t
N u m b e r
N o . A n a l y s e d
M a i l e d
f o r A n a l y s i s
A n a l y s e d
v N o . M a i l e d %
M a i l e d
f o r A n a l y
s i s
A n a l y s e d
v N o . M a i l e d %
P o s t a l i n 2 0 1 0 :
A u s t r i a
1 2 , 0 0 0
1 , 0 0 0
9 0 8
7
. 6 %
1 2 , 0 0 0
1 , 0 0 0
9 8 7
8 . 2 %
F i n l a n d
8 , 0 0 0
1 , 5 0 0
1 , 3 3 8
1 6 . 7 %
8 , 0 0 0
1 , 5 7 5
1 , 5 1 4
1 8 . 9 %
G e r m a n y E & W
1 3 0 , 0 0 0
9 , 0 0 0
7 , 9 1 9
6
. 1 %
1 4 0 , 0 0 0
7 , 5 0 0
7 , 0 3 7
5 . 0 %
P o r t u g a l
1 2 , 2 0 0
1 , 0 0 0
9 8 4
8
. 1 %
1 2 , 2 0 0
1 , 3 5 0
8 2 0
6 . 7 %
R o m a n i a
7 , 0 0 0
1 , 0 0 0
9 9 0
1 4 . 1 %
7 , 0 0 0
1 , 0 4 0
1 , 0 2 5
1 4 . 6 %
S p a i n
9 , 5 0 0
7 5 0
4 8 3
5
. 1 %
9 , 5 0 0
8 0 0
7 5 3
7 . 9 %
S w
e d e n
1 0 , 0 0 0
1 , 0 0 0
1 , 3 6 4
1 3 . 6 %
1 0 , 0 0 0
1 , 0 0 0
1 , 0 3 0
1 0 . 3 %
S w
i t z e r l a n d F & G
2 9 , 9 1 8
1 , 5 0 0
1 , 3 3 6
4
. 5 %
4 2 , 0 0 0
3 , 0 0 0
1 , 0 8 2
2 . 6 %
T o t
a l
2 1 8 , 6 1 8
1 6 , 7 5 0
1 5 , 3 2 2
7
. 0 %
2 4 0 , 7 0 0
1 7 , 2 6 5
1 4 , 2 4 8
5 . 9 %
O n
- L i n e i n 2 0 1 0 :
A l l P o s t a l i n 2 0 0 9 a p a r t f r o m
U K :
B e l g i u m
F & F l
1 4 , 2 5 3
2 , 0 0 0
1 , 9 7 3
1 3 . 8 %
1 0 , 0 4 1
7 0 0
8 6 3
8 . 6 %
C z e c h
2 0 , 0 0 0
2 , 0 0 0
2 , 8 8 6
1 4 . 4 %
1 2 , 5 0 0
1 , 3 5 0
1 , 3 0 1
1 0 . 4 %
F r a
n c e
2 0 0 , 0 0 0
2 , 0 0 0
2 , 0 5 0
1
. 0 %
9 , 3 7 7
1 , 4 0 0
8 6 3
9 . 2 %
H u n g a r y
2 0 , 0 0 0
2 , 0 0 0
3 , 1 9 1
1 6 . 0 %
1 0 , 0 0 0
1 , 3 0 0
1 , 2 2 4
1 2 . 2 %
N e t h e r l a n d s *
1 3 , 6 2 4
2 , 0 0 0
2 , 1 0 6
1 5 . 5 %
1 0 , 0 8 7
9 0 0
1 , 0 2 6
1 0 . 2 %
P o l a n d
2 0 , 1 7 4
2 , 0 0 0
9 2 0
4
. 6 %
1 0 , 0 0 0
1 , 3 4 0
8 4 4
8 . 4 %
R u s s i a
2 4 , 8 5 5
2 , 0 0 0
1 , 6 6 0
6
. 7 %
1 0 , 0 0 0
1 , 0 0 0
1 , 0 9 4
1 0 . 9 %
U K
*
3 4 , 2 8 2
2 , 0 0 0
2 , 0 5 5
6
. 0 %
1 9 , 8 8 9
2 , 0 0 0
1 , 8 2 4
9 . 2 %
T o t
a l
3 4 7 , 1 8 8
1 6 , 0 0 0
1 6 , 8 4 1
4
. 9 %
9 1 , 8 9 4
9 , 9 9 0
9 , 0 3 9
9 . 8 %
T o t
a l o n - l i n e + p o s t a l
5 6 5 , 8 0 6
3 2 , 7 5 0
3 2 , 1 6 3
5
. 7 %
3 3 2 , 5 9 4
2 7 , 2 5 5
2 3 , 2 8 7
7 . 0 %
C o m
m e n t a r y :
* M a x i m u m
t a r g e t s b y c o u n t r y d i f f e r e d a c c o r d i n g t o e a c h c o u n t r y ' s r e q u i r e m e n t s
* T a r g e t s f o r o n - l i n e c o u n t r i e s w e r e i n c r e a s e d i n 2 0 1 0 t o a l l o w f o r t h e s p l i t s a m p l e
* R e s
p o n d e n t s a g e d < 2 0 y r s w e r e e x c l u d e d i n
e v e r y c o u n t r y
P o s t a l :
* C o m p l e t e d q u e s t i o n n a i r e s w e r e r e t u r n e d t o R
e a d e r ' s D i g e s t l o c a l o f f i c e s a n d t h e n
d i s p
a t c h e d i n b u l k t o t h e U K
* A s e a c h c o u n t r y h a d a " m a x i m u m " t a r g e t f o r
a n a l y s i s t h e y o n l y d i s p a t c h e d t h e
q u a n t i t y r e q u i r e d f o r d a t a p r o c e s s i n g
* N u m b e r a n a l y s e d v n u m b e r m a i l e d d o e s n o t
r e f l e c t t h e o v e r a l l r e s p o n s e r a t e a s
c o u n t r i e s o n l y d i s p a t c h e d t h e i r t a r g e t
* R e t u r n e d q u e s t i o n n a i r e s w i t h n o a g e / s e x
d a t a w e r e e x c l u d e d f r o m
a n a l y s i s
* I n 2 0 0 9 m a n y r e s p o n s e s w e r e e x c l u d e d
i n S w i t z e r l a n d t o r e t a i n t h e c o r r e c t r a t i o o
f
F r e n c h t o G e r m a n , t h u s r e d u c i n g t h e t o t a
l a n a l y s e d
O n - l i n e :
* A p a r t f r o m
P o l a n d a l l e - m a i l i n v i t a t i o n s w
e r e i s s u e d f r o m
t h e U . K .
* D e l i v e r y r a t e s v a r i e d m a s s i v e l y b y c o u n t r y ( o l d a d d r e s s e s / S p a m
g u a r d s e t c . )
* N o . a n a l y s e d v n u m b e r m a i l e d i s n ' t a t r u
e r e f l e c t i o n o f r e s p o n s e r a t e d u e t o n o n
d e l i v e r y i s s u e s
* I n c e n t i v e s w e r e n ' t o f f e r e d i n F r a n c e a n d
B e l g i u m
Appendix i
Response rate by country 2010 v 2009
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 44/62
44www.rdtrustedbrands.com
Appendix ii
Respondent base 2006 - 2010
Y e
a r l y c o m p a r i s o n - q u a n t i t y a n a l y s e d y e a r o n y e a r p a s t 5 y e a r s
2 0 0 6
2 0 0 7
2 0 0 8
2 0 0 9
2 0 1 0
A u
s t r i a
9 2 7
6 6 5
6 0 8
9 8 7
9 0 8
B e
l g i u m
7 5 5
9 4 5
8 5 4
8 6 3
1 , 9
7 3
C z
e c h
1 , 2
9 3
1 , 1
9 1
1 , 2
8 7
1 , 3 0
1
2 , 8
8 6
F i n l a n d
1 , 6
4 0
1 , 3
8 4
1 , 3
5 9
1 , 5 1
4
1 , 3
3 8
F r a n c e
1 , 1
1 5
9 8 3
9 4 5
8 6 3
2 , 0
5 0
G e r m a n y
7 , 1
1 9
6 , 7
3 3
5 , 2
6 7
7 , 0 3
7
7 , 9
1 9
H u
n g a r y
1 , 2
9 5
1 , 2
8 0
1 , 3
3 2
1 , 2 2
4
3 , 1
9 1
N e
t h e r l a n d s
1 , 2
4 6
1 , 2
3 2
1 , 1
8 3
1 , 0 2
6
2 , 1
0 6
P o
l a n d
1 , 1
0 9
1 , 2
3 9
1 , 0
1 2
8 4 4
9 2 0
P o
r t u g a l
1 , 0
2 2
1 , 1
8 9
9 0 1
8 2 0
9 8 4
R o
m a n i a
1 , 1
9 0
1 , 2
9 9
1 , 0 2
5
9 9 0
R u
s s i a
1 , 3
3 0
7 5 7
1 , 1
5 8
1 , 0 9
4
1 , 6
6 0
S p
a i n
6 2 7
6 2 6
6 5 0
7 5 3
4 8 3
S w
e d e n
N o t i n c l u d
e d
9 9 3
1 , 0
3 0
1 , 3 6
4
S w
i t z e r l a n d
1 , 0
6 1
1 , 0
5 2
8 6 4
1 , 0 8
2
1 , 3
3 6
U K
4 , 8
9 4
3 , 7
4 8
3 , 9
3 9
1 , 8 2
4
2 , 0
5 5
T o
t a l
2 5 , 4 3 4
2 4 , 2 1 3
2 3 , 6 5 1
2 3 , 2 8
7
3 2 , 1 6 3
C o
m m e n t a r y :
* T a r g e t r e s p o n s e f o r G e r m a n y i s s i g n i f i c a n t l y h i g h e r t h a n o t h e r c o u n t r i e s t o e n a b l e d e
t a i l e d c o m p a r i s o n o f E & W
* F i e l d w o r k f o r U K h a s b e e n c o n d u c t e d e x c l u s i v e l y o n - l i n e s i n c e 2 0 0 5
* I n
2 0 1 0 t h e U K w a s j o i n e d b y 7 c o u n t r i e s f o r o n - l i n e d a t a g a t h e r i n g ( a l l s h o w n i n i t a l i c s )
* A
s p a r t o f t h e i r o n - l i n e m e t h o d o l o g y e a c h c o u n t r y d o u b l e d t h e i r o n - l i n e t a r g e t r e s p o n s e
* E a c h o n - l i n e r e s p o n d e n t w a s r e q u i r e d t o a n s w e r o n l y h a l f t h e b r a n d q u e s t i o n s
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 46/62
46www.rdtrustedbrands.com
R e s p o n d e n t p r o f i l e a c r o s s a l l c o u n t r i e s
T o t a l 1 6 c o u n t r i e s
T o t a l
3 2 , 1 6 2
1 5 , 4 2 3
1 6 , 7 4 0
1 7 , 0 7 0
1 5 , 0 8 9
2 3 , 0 3 2
9 , 1 2 6
1 6 , 5 0 3
5 , 7 2 2
8 , 8 0 4
1 0 0 %
1 0 0 %
1 0 0 %
1 0 0 %
1 0 0 %
1 0 0 %
1 0 0 %
1 0 0 %
1 0 0 %
1 0 0 %
M e n
4 8 %
1 0 0 %
0 %
5 0 %
4 6 %
4 9 %
4 5 %
5 0 %
4 4 %
4 7 %
W o
m e n
5 2 %
0 %
1 0 0 %
5 0 %
5 4 %
5 1 %
5 5 %
5 0 %
5 6 %
5 3 %
1 5 -
1 9
E x c l u d
e d f r o m
a n a l y s i s
2 0 -
3 9
2 5 %
2 6 %
2 5 %
4 8 %
0 %
3 5 %
0 %
1 7 %
1 7 %
4 9 %
4 0 -
4 9
2 8 %
3 0 %
2 6 %
5 2 %
0 %
3 9 %
0 %
2 3 %
2 4 %
3 9 %
5 0 -
5 9
1 9 %
1 8 %
1 9 %
0 %
4 0 %
2 6 %
0 %
2 5 %
1 7 %
8 %
6 0 +
2 8 %
2 7 %
3 0 %
0 %
6 0 %
0 %
1 0 0 %
3 5 %
4 2 %
4 %
A d u l t s o n l y
5 1 %
5 4 %
4 9 %
3 9 %
6 6 %
4 6 %
6 4 %
1 0 0 %
0 %
0 %
S i n g l e p e r s o n
1 8 %
1 6 %
1 9 %
1 4 %
2 3 %
1 4 %
2 6 %
0 %
1 0 0 %
0 %
F a m
i l i e s
2 7 %
2 7 %
2 8 %
4 5 %
7 %
3 7 %
4 %
0 %
0 %
1 0 0 %
Families
Single person
Adults only
Over 60
Under 60
Over 50
Under 50
Women
Men
Total
Appendix iv
Respondent profile across all countries
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 47/62
47www.rdtrustedbrands.com
R e s p o n d e n t p r o f i l e b y c o u n t r y
S e x / a g e / h o u s e h o l d
T o t a l
2 0 1 0
9 0 8
1 9 7 3
2 8 8 6
1 3 3 8
2 0 5 0
7 9 1 9
3 1 9 1
2 1 0 6
9 2 0
9 8 4
9 9 0
1 6 6 0
4 8 3
1 3 6 4
1 3 3 6
2 0 5 5
1 0 0 %
1 0 0 %
1 0 0 %
1 0 0 %
1 0 0 %
1 0 0 %
1 0 0 %
1 0 0 %
1 0 0 %
1 0 0 %
1 0 0 %
1 0 0 %
1 0 0 %
1 0 0 %
1 0 0 %
1 0 0 %
1 0 0 %
M e n
9 6 4
4 4 0
9 5 2
1 4 2 6
6 4 8
9 7 8
3 8 2 6
1 4 7 0
1 0 3 7
4 5 7
4 6 7
4 6 9
7 4 3
2 3 7
6 7 2
5 9 6
1 0 0 6
4 8 %
4 8 %
4 8 %
4 9 %
4 8 %
4 8 %
4 8 %
4 6 %
4 9 %
5 0 %
4 7 %
4 7 %
4 5 %
4 9 %
4 9 %
4 5 %
4 9 %
W o m
e n
1 0 4 6
4 6 8
1 0 2 1
1 4 6 1
6 9 0
1 0 7 2
4 0 9 3
1 7 2 0
1 0 6 9
4 6 3
5 1 7
5 2 1
9 1 7
2 4 6
6 9 2
7 4 0
1 0 4 9
5 2 %
5 2 %
5 2 %
5 1 %
5 2 %
5 2 %
5 2 %
5 4 %
5 1 %
5 0 %
5 3 %
5 3 %
5 5 %
5 1 %
5 1 %
5 5 %
5 1 %
U n d e r 5 0
1 0 6 7
5 0 8
1 0 7 7
1 5 8 8
6 7 1
1 1 6 0
4 0 0 0
1 7 2 2
1 1 7 8
5 5 0
5 5 9
5 2 9
9 8 9
2 8 1
7 0 0
5 0 5
1 0 5 3
5 4 %
5 6 %
5 4 %
5 5 %
5 0 %
5 7 %
5 1 %
5 4 %
5 5 %
6 0 %
5 8 %
5 4 %
5 9 %
5 8 %
5 1 %
3 8 %
5 1 %
O v e r 5 0
9 4 3
4 0 1
8 9 6
1 2 9 8
6 6 6
8 9 0
3 9 2 0
1 4 6 9
9 2 7
3 6 9
4 2 5
4 6 0
6 7 2
2 0 3
6 6 3
8 3 1
9 9 8
4 6 %
4 4 %
4 5 %
4 5 %
5 0 %
4 4 %
4 9 %
4 6 %
4 4 %
4 1 %
4 3 %
4 6 %
4 0 %
4 3 %
4 9 %
6 2 %
4 9 %
U n d e r 6 0
1 4 4 0
6 5 5
1 4 1 1
2 1 0 5
9 2 4
1 4 8 3
5 3 3 9
2 3 0 4
1 5 6 1
8 3 7
7 0 8
6 7 1
1 4 8 9
3 5 3
9 2 5
7 9 2
1 4 7 6
7 3 %
7 2 %
7 1 %
7 3 %
6 9 %
7 3 %
6 8 %
7 2 %
7 3 %
9 1 %
7 3 %
6 8 %
8 9 %
7 3 %
6 8 %
5 9 %
7 2 %
O v e r 6 0
5 7 0
2 5 4
5 6 2
7 8 1
4 1 3
5 6 7
2 5 8 1
8 8 7
5 4 4
8 2
2 7 6
3 1 8
1 7 2
1 3 1
4 3 8
5 4 4
5 7 5
2 7 %
2 8 %
2 8 %
2 7 %
3 1 %
2 8 %
3 2 %
2 8 %
2 6 %
1 0 %
2 8 %
3 2 %
1 0 %
2 8 %
3 2 %
4 1 %
2 8 %
A d u l t s o n l y
1 0 3 1
4 6 4
1 0 6 1
1 4 7 6
6 0 1
9 6 2
4 3 6 7
1 6 1 1
1 0 3 4
2 6 7
5 1 3
5 8 9
8 9 3
3 0 3
5 9 9
7 0 9
1 0 5 3
5 1 %
5 1 %
5 4 %
5 1 %
4 5 %
4 7 %
5 5 %
5 0 %
4 9 %
2 9 %
5 2 %
6 0 %
5 4 %
6 3 %
4 4 %
5 3 %
5 1 %
S i n g
l e p e r s o n
3 5 8
1 8 1
3 3 1
3 7 8
2 8 4
3 2 5
1 8 0 9
4 2 8
4 7 5
2 2 3
7 3
7 6
7 8
5 8
3 4 7
3 1 4
3 4 2
1 7 %
2 0 %
1 7 %
1 3 %
2 1 %
1 6 %
2 3 %
1 3 %
2 3 %
2 4 %
7 %
8 %
5 %
1 2 %
2 5 %
2 4 %
1 7 %
F a m
i l i e s
5 5 0
2 3 5
5 3 1
9 3 0
3 8 6
7 0 5
1 4 4 7
1 0 2 2
5 4 3
3 4 4
3 7 2
2 8 0
6 5 7
1 0 8
3 6 9
2 6 2
6 1 3
2 9 %
2 6 %
2 7 %
3 2 %
2 9 %
3 4 %
1 8 %
3 2 %
2 6 %
3 7 %
3 8 %
2 8 %
4 0 %
2 2 %
2 7 %
2 0 %
3 0 %
Appendix v
Respondent profile by country
UK
Switzerland
Sweden
Spain
Russia
Romania
Portugal
Poland
Netherlands
Hungary
Germany
France
Finland
Czech
Belgium
Austria
Average allcountries
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 48/62
48www.rdtrustedbrands.com
A s i d e n t i f i e d b y r e s p o n d e n t s t h e m s e l v e s
P e r s o n a l i t y
T o t a
l
2 0 1 0
9 0 8
1 9 7 3
2 8 8 6
1 3 3 8
2 0 5 0
7 9 1 9
3 1 9 1
2 1 0 6
9 2 0
9 8 4
9 9 0
1 6 6 0
4 8 3
1 3 6 4
1 3 3 6
2 0 5 5
A c t i v e
5 2 %
6 2 %
5 3 %
4 9 %
3 4 %
5 2 %
5 5 %
6 0 %
5 3 %
6 0 %
4 4 %
7 1 %
4 4 %
5 6 %
4 2 %
5 9 %
3 8 %
A d v e n t u r o u s
2 8 %
4 3 %
2 6 %
1 2 %
3 4 %
1 7 %
3 2 %
3 9 %
3 2 %
4 1 %
2 3 %
1 9 %
1 5 %
2 5 %
3 5 %
3 1 %
2 6 %
A m b
i t i o u s
3 2 %
4 0 %
2 3 %
2 2 %
2 3 %
2 0 %
4 2 %
3 1 %
2 7 %
5 6 %
2 7 %
6 4 %
1 6 %
1 5 %
5 4 %
3 1 %
2 2 %
C a r e
e r
1 4 %
1 7 %
1 1 %
4 %
1 0 %
5 %
1 3 %
5 %
1 2 %
7 %
4 3 %
5 4 %
7 %
8 %
6 %
1 2 %
1 4 %
C a u t i o u s
4 8 %
5 0 %
5 4 %
4 0 %
4 3 %
5 3 %
5 0 %
5 3 %
4 5 %
4 4 %
5 0 %
6 9 %
3 8 %
4 7 %
4 7 %
5 3 %
3 5 %
C o m
m u n i t y - m i n d e d
4 1 %
6 0 %
4 0 %
3 7 %
3 9 %
6 4 %
6 4 %
4 7 %
2 2 %
2 6 %
2 6 %
5 7 %
2 8 %
2 3 %
3 4 %
6 1 %
3 0 %
C o n f o r m i s t
1 6 %
4 %
6 %
4 %
7 8 %
5 %
3 %
7 2 %
4 %
4 %
8 %
2 9 %
4 %
2 5 %
2 %
5 %
1 0 %
D e c i s i v e
4 3 %
5 1 %
3 8 %
3 2 %
5 2 %
4 0 %
5 0 %
5 7 %
4 7 %
3 8 %
3 9 %
4 0 %
3 6 %
2 6 %
5 8 %
4 9 %
3 1 %
D i s c
e r n i n g
4 0 %
4 1 %
3 1 %
2 6 %
5 3 %
2 7 %
3 7 %
7 7 %
3 8 %
6 4 %
3 3 %
6 3 %
2 9 %
1 2 %
4 9 %
3 8 %
2 6 %
F a m
i l y o r i e n t e d
6 7 %
8 2 %
6 5 %
6 0 %
6 6 %
6 9 %
7 8 %
8 1 %
6 0 %
7 6 %
4 5 %
8 0 %
6 0 %
5 8 %
5 2 %
7 5 %
6 9 %
F o l l o w e r
1 6 %
4 7 %
3 %
8 %
3 1 %
5 %
4 2 %
1 6 %
2 %
6 %
2 %
2 2 %
9 %
9 %
5 %
4 9 %
7 %
F u l f i l l e d
3 3 %
3 4 %
4 5 %
6 %
6 4 %
1 2 %
2 6 %
2 6 %
6 6 %
1 5 %
2 5 %
3 6 %
2 9 %
4 0 %
5 1 %
4 0 %
1 7 %
G l o b
a l
2 2 %
3 3 %
3 5 %
7 %
2 0 %
5 5 %
2 9 %
3 0 %
2 3 %
7 %
1 1 %
1 6 %
1 0 %
1 3 %
2 1 %
2 5 %
1 0 %
H o n e s t
7 9 %
8 3 %
8 5 %
5 8 %
8 9 %
8 0 %
8 3 %
8 3 %
8 4 %
7 0 %
6 6 %
8 5 %
6 3 %
7 7 %
8 8 %
8 2 %
8 5 %
I m p u l s i v e
2 6 %
3 7 %
2 1 %
2 4 %
2 5 %
2 6 %
3 5 %
1 7 %
2 6 %
3 0 %
2 5 %
2 5 %
2 0 %
2 9 %
2 9 %
3 0 %
2 4 %
I n f l u
e n t i a l
1 3 %
1 6 %
9 %
5 %
1 5 %
1 1 %
1 2 %
5 %
9 %
1 3 %
1 3 %
2 2 %
1 1 %
1 6 %
1 6 %
1 4 %
1 7 %
L a i d
b a c k
2 9 %
3 4 %
4 0 %
8 %
4 2 %
3 7 %
3 2 %
2 3 %
5 2 %
4 5 %
6 %
3 3 %
4 %
1 %
3 8 %
3 6 %
3 8 %
L e a d e r
1 9 %
1 3 %
1 9 %
1 9 %
1 2 %
1 2 %
8 %
2 2 %
2 2 %
3 2 %
1 9 %
3 0 %
2 4 %
1 5 %
2 7 %
1 5 %
2 2 %
L o c a l
2 5 %
3 1 %
1 3 %
3 1 %
4 8 %
7 %
3 4 %
5 6 %
2 2 %
2 1 %
1 3 %
2 3 %
7 %
1 6 %
2 1 %
2 9 %
2 4 %
M o d
e r n
3 2 %
3 2 %
2 8 %
2 5 %
3 5 %
2 9 %
3 3 %
3 5 %
3 0 %
4 2 %
2 5 %
4 6 %
4 1 %
2 9 %
2 4 %
2 8 %
2 5 %
O p t i m i s t i c
5 7 %
7 3 %
5 2 %
5 0 %
5 3 %
4 3 %
6 6 %
5 6 %
6 0 %
5 4 %
3 9 %
7 2 %
6 2 %
5 8 %
6 0 %
6 5 %
5 1 %
P a s s i o n a t e
3 1 %
4 0 %
3 1 %
1 7 %
1 9 %
4 1 %
3 3 %
3 2 %
2 7 %
9 %
3 6 %
5 6 %
2 2 %
3 5 %
2 6 %
3 5 %
3 7 %
P r a c
t i c a l
6 5 %
7 3 %
6 2 %
6 2 %
7 3 %
4 6 %
7 5 %
6 7 %
6 6 %
6 3 %
5 3 %
7 7 %
5 1 %
6 9 %
7 1 %
7 3 %
6 6 %
R e b e l
1 5 %
1 8 %
1 6 %
1 3 %
1 0 %
2 0 %
1 3 %
1 9 %
1 4 %
3 1 %
1 1 %
1 2 %
8 %
1 5 %
9 %
1 7 %
1 0 %
S e l f
c o n f i d e n t
4 2 %
6 6 %
3 1 %
2 5 %
3 3 %
1 5 %
6 4 %
4 0 %
4 6 %
4 1 %
3 1 %
6 3 %
4 4 %
4 3 %
4 0 %
5 2 %
4 3 %
S e t t l e d
4 0 %
3 1 %
3 6 %
1 6 %
4 6 %
4 7 %
2 7 %
6 5 %
3 0 %
4 1 %
1 2 %
6 4 %
4 6 %
3 8 %
6 8 %
2 8 %
4 2 %
S t r e s s e d
2 1 %
2 3 %
2 1 %
1 1 %
2 3 %
3 0 %
2 4 %
1 7 %
1 4 %
2 1 %
1 7 %
2 5 %
1 9 %
2 1 %
2 4 %
1 7 %
2 5 %
S t y l i s h
2 0 %
3 2 %
1 7 %
9 %
1 4 %
2 7 %
2 5 %
2 3 %
2 1 %
2 3 %
9 %
3 2 %
1 7 %
1 2 %
1 4 %
2 5 %
1 6 %
T r a d
i t i o n a l
3 5 %
4 3 %
2 9 %
2 5 %
5 5 %
2 7 %
3 8 %
4 0 %
3 4 %
3 2 %
2 3 %
4 2 %
1 8 %
4 9 %
1 8 %
4 0 %
4 4 %
U n f u
l f i l l e d
1 1 %
6 %
7 %
6 %
9 %
1 4 %
9 %
1 8 %
4 %
1 9 %
2 2 %
1 3 %
7 %
1 5 %
4 %
6 %
1 4 %
Appendix vi
Respondent personality
UK
Switzerland
Sweden
Spain
Russia
Romania
Portugal
Poland
Netherlands
Hungary
Germany
France
Finland
Czech
Belgium
Austria
Average allcountries
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 49/62
49www.rdtrustedbrands.com
V o t e
s c a s t w i t h i n e a c h o f t h e 2 0 c o m m o n c
a t e g o r i e s - r a n k e d h i g h e s t f i r s t
C a t e g o r y
R e s p o n s e
2 0 0 9
2 0 0 8
% o
f
% o
f
%
o f
% o
f
T o t a l a c r o s s
R e s p o n d e n t s
T o t a l a c r o s s
R e s p o n d e n t s
T o t a l a c r o s s
R e s p
o n d e n t s
T o t a l a c r o s s
R e s p o n d e n t s
a l l c o u n t r i e s
v o t i n g i n t h i s
a l l c o u n t r i e s
v o t i n g i n t h i s
a l l c o u n t r i e s
v o t i n
g i n t h i s
a l l c o u n t r i e s
v o t i n g i n t h i s
c a t e g o r y
e x c . U K
c a
t e g o r y e x c . U K
c a t e g o r y
e x c . U K
c a t e g o r y e x c . U
K
C a r *
1 9 , 6 7
4
8 5 %
1 8 , 0
7 6
8 4 %
2 1 , 2
6 4
9
8 %
1 7 , 9
0 8
9 1 %
B a n k / B u i l d i n g S o c i e t y
1 7 , 8 6
2
8 0 %
1 7 , 0
7 4
8 0 %
1 9 , 1
7 8
8
8 %
1 7 , 4
2 0
8 8 %
K i t c h e n A p p l i a n c e
1 7 , 4 9
2
7 8 %
1 6 , 7
5 8
7 8 %
1 7 , 8
4 0
8
2 %
1 6 , 4
3 6
8 3 %
M o
b i l e P h o n e H a n d s e t
1 6 , 7 3
1
7 5 %
1 5 , 9
8 0
7 4 %
1 7 , 3
7 4
8
0 %
1 5 , 7
6 9
8 0 %
S o a p P o w d e r
1 6 , 4 0
5
7 3 %
1 5 , 7
8 6
7 4 %
1 6 , 9
7 4
7
8 %
1 5 , 5
6 8
7 9 %
I n s u r a n c e C o m p a n y
1 6 , 3 8
3
7 3 %
1 5 , 7
6 1
7 3 %
1 7 , 0
8 0
7
9 %
1 5 , 8
0 0
8 0 %
M o
b i l e P h o n e S e r v i c e P r o v i d e r
1 6 , 0 6
9
7 2 %
1 5 , 3
0 9
7 1 %
1 6 , 8
6 5
7
8 %
1 5 , 1
4 3
7 7 %
P e t
r o l R e t a i l e r
1 4 , 9 7
0
6 7 %
1 4 , 2
8 4
6 7 %
1 5 , 7
5 2
7
3 %
1 4 , 2
5 6
7 2 %
C a m e r a
1 4 , 8 2
9
6 6 %
1 4 , 0
8 6
6 6 %
1 4 , 9
4 3
6
9 %
1 3 , 3
3 0
6 8 %
H a i r C a r e P r o d u c t
1 3 , 2 3
5
5 9 %
1 2 , 7
9 3
6 0 %
1 4 , 0
3 6
6
5 %
1 2 , 8
9 2
6 5 %
C r e
d i t C a r d
1 3 , 1 8
7
5 9 %
1 2 , 4
9 5
5 8 %
1 4 , 4
5 3
6
7 %
1 2 , 9
6 3
6 6 %
S k i n C a r e
1 3 , 0 3
2
5 8 %
1 2 , 5
3 4
5 8 %
1 3 , 6
7 5
6
3 %
1 2 , 6
3 8
6 4 %
A n a l g e s i c / P a i n R e l i e f T a b l e t
1 2 , 8 3
4
5 7 %
1 2 , 3
3 8
5 7 %
1 3 , 9
4 6
6
4 %
1 2 , 7
7 2
6 5 %
P e r
s o n a l C o m p u t e r
1 1 , 8 8
1
5 3 %
1 1 , 1
2 4
5 2 %
1 2 , 1
3 7
5
6 %
1 0 , 5
8 5
5 4 %
I n t e
r n e t S e r v i c e P r o v i d e r
1 0 , 9 8
3
4 9 %
1 0 , 1
4 4
4 7 %
1 1 , 2
1 7
5
2 %
9 , 4
6 4
4 8 %
H o l i d a y C o m p a n y / T o u r O p e r a t o r
1 0 , 8 4
9
4 8 %
1 0 , 3
2 5
4 8 %
1 1 , 3
0 2
5
2 %
1 0 , 3
6 7
5 3 %
C o u g h / C o l d R e m e d y
9 , 6 8
2
4 3 %
9 , 2
5 7
4 3 %
1 0 , 5
1 7
4
9 %
9 , 5
7 8
4 9 %
C o s m e t i c
9 , 1 8
0
4 1 %
8 , 8
3 7
4 1 %
9 , 9
0 7
4
6 %
9 , 2
2 8
4 7 %
B r e
a k f a s t c e r e a l
8 , 9 8
8
4 0 %
8 , 3
2 3
3 9 %
1 0 , 7
0 8
4
9 %
9 , 1
0 1
4 6 %
V i t a
m i n s
7 , 4 4
4
3 3 %
7 , 1
6 5
3 3 %
8 , 5
0 6
3
9 %
7 , 6
5 1
3 9 %
T o t a l a c r o s s 2 0 c a t e g o r i e s
2 7 1 , 7 1 0
6 1 %
2 5 8 , 4 4 9
6 0 %
2 8 7 , 6 7 4
6
6 %
2 5 8 , 8 6 9
6 6 %
T o t a l r e s p o n d e n t b a s e *
2 2 , 3 7
5
1 0 0 %
2 1 , 4 6 3
1 0 0 %
2 1 , 6 8 2
1 0 0 %
1 9 , 7 1 2
1 0 0 %
* A l t
h o u g h t h e U K h a d a t o t a l r e s p o n d e n t b a s
e o f 1 , 8 2 4 , h a l f w e r e a s k e d a b o u t 5 0 % o
f c a t e g o r i e s a n d t h e r e m a i n d e r a s k e d a b o
u t t h e o t h e r 5 0 %
* A l l
U K r e s p o n d e n t s w e r e a s k e d t o c o m p l e t e
t h e b r a n d q u e s t i o n s f o r t h e c a r c a t e g o r y
s o t h e a l l c o u n t r y r e s p o n d e n t b a s e w a s 2
3 , 2 8 7
* A s l i g h t c h a n g e i n q u e s t i o n n a i r e l a y o u t i n s o
m e c o u n t r i e s r e s u l t e d i n r e s p o n d e n t c o n f u s i o n , t h i s m i g h t e x p l a i n t h e l o w e r r e s p o n
s e r a t e s t o s o m e c a t e g o r i e s
Appendix vii
Category votes for 2009
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 50/62
50www.rdtrustedbrands.com
Background
With the intention that the survey results will have maximum relevance to marketers, everyattempt has been made to ensure that, as far as possible, they represent the views of thepopulation in general rather than purely "Reader’s Digest readers". Not only will brandpreferences vary but so will levels of trust in different professions and institutions. For thesereasons weightings were applied to the respondents to bring them in line with the populationby age + sex.
STAGE 1: local identification of respondent names. Prior to mailing and e-mailing, eachedition was advised to identify a sample of subscribers who, as far as possible, mightrepresent the population profile by age and sex.
STAGE 2: Respondents were classified according to their age and sex prior to comparisonwith the population profile. Weightings were then applied to each respondent according towhether their sex/age group was "over" or "under" represented v the population profile. Aswith ETB09 most countries had a significant under representation of younger people (15 –19yrs) we therefore excluded them from analysis in all countries.
With the aim of producing a weight of no more than 2 in every cell, age groups were“collapsed" (grouped) together as far as was meaningful.
The following tables show country by country the weights that were applied and the final agebreaks that were achieved prior to analysing the results.
The 8 on-line countries had a split sample (half the sample was asked to respond to 50% of
the brand categories and the remaining half the other 50%). In every case the 2 sampleswere weighted independently e.g. Belgium 1 and Belgium 2.
Some countries were unable to provide precise population profiles matching the needs ofthe survey. This is why, even though they may have received a high response within certainage groups, it’s not possible to weight them back to the population.
Appendix vii
Weighting factors applied in each country
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 51/62
51www.rdtrustedbrands.com
AustriaGroup Resp % Popn % Weight
M 20-49 6.28 27.05 4.31
M 50-59 12.22 7.82 0.64
M 60-69 28.74 6.77 0.24
M 70+ 11.12 6.76 0.61
W 20-49 8.15 28.83 3.54
W 50-59 8.70 8.34 0.96
W 60-69 17.95 7.21 0.40
W 70+ 6.83 7.21 1.06
Belgium 1 Belgium 2
Group Resp % Popn % Weight Group Resp % Popn % Weight
M 20-49 14.08 27.53 1.95 M 20-49 14.99 27.53 1.84
M 50-59 19.86 8.47 0.43 M 50-59 21.48 8.47 0.39
M 60+ 30.70 12.27 0.40 M 60+ 31.31 12.27 0.39
W 20-49 11.85 27.05 2.28 W 20-49 12.36 27.05 2.19
W 50-59 13.68 8.45 0.62 W 50-59 13.88 8.45 0.61
W 60+ 9.83 16.24 1.65 W 60+ 10.13 16.24 1.60
Czech Republic 1 Czech Republic 2
Group Resp % Popn % Weight Group Resp % Popn % Weight
M 20-39 11.35 20.32 1.79 M 20-39 10.10 20.32 2.01
M 40-49 10.24 8.49 0.83 M 40-49 8.79 8.49 0.96
M 50-59 15.09 8.98 0.59 M 50-59 13.91 8.98 0.64
M 60+ 14.26 11.64 0.82 M 60+ 14.05 11.64 0.83
W 20-39 13.36 18.40 1.38 W 20-39 16.54 18.40 1.11
W 40-49 12.46 7.84 0.63 W 40-49 12.80 7.84 0.61
W 50-59 15.43 8.94 0.58 W 50-59 14.74 8.94 0.61
W 60+ 7.82 15.40 1.97 W 60+ 8.93 15.40 1.72
Finland
Group Resp % Popn % Weight Group Resp % Popn % Weight
M 20-39 9.94 16.39 1.65
M 40-49 8.30 9.21 1.11
M 50-59 9.79 9.44 0.96
M 60-69 10.46 7.43 0.71
M 70-79 4.26 4.18 0.98
M 80+ 2.02 1.79 0.89
W 20-39 14.28 15.59 1.09
W 40-49 12.03 8.98 0.75
W 50-59 11.43 9.49 0.83
W 60-69 9.79 7.96 0.81
W 70-79 5.38 5.54 1.03
W 80+ 2.32 4.00 1.73
Appendix vii
Population weightings applied in each country
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 52/62
52www.rdtrustedbrands.com
France 1 France 2Group Resp % Popn % Weight Group Resp % Popn % Weight
M 20-39 8.47 18.89 2.23 M 20-39 8.47 18.89 2.45
M 40-49 10.31 9.36 0.91 M 40-49 10.61 9.36 0.97
M 50-59 9.08 7.94 0.87 M 50-59 11.73 7.94 0.74
M 60+ 9.08 11.57 1.27 M 60+ 9.80 11.57 1.30
W 20-39 22.96 19.36 0.84 W 20-39 25.31 19.36 0.84
W 40-49 19.80 9.00 0.45 W 40-49 22.24 9.00 0.44
W 50-59 13.78 7.87 0.57 W 50-59 14.59 7.87 0.59
W 60+ 6.53 16.02 2.45 W 60+ 6.94 16.02 2.53
Germany
Group Resp % Popn % Weight Group Resp % Popn % Weight
M 20-49 6.41 25.64 4.00
M 50-59 13.07 8.39 0.64
M 60-69 25.43 7.38 0.29
M 70-79 9.38 5.46 0.58
M 80+ 4.94 1.44 0.29
W 20-49 7.10 24.86 3.50
W 50-59 10.10 8.52 0.84
W 60-69 14.76 8.00 0.54
W 70-79 5.49 7.55 1.37
W 80+ 3.31 2.76 0.83
Hungary 1 Hungary 2
Group Resp % Popn % Weight Group Resp % Popn % Weight
M 20-39 8.31 18.56 2.23 M 20-39 8.94 18.56 2.08
M 40-49 6.61 8.37 1.27 M 40-49 8.19 8.37 1.03
M 50-59 9.38 8.56 0.91 M 50-59 10.33 8.56 0.83
M 60+9.38 10.65 1.13 M 60+ 10.08 10.65 1.06
W 20-39 20.09 18.48 0.92 W 20-39 18.14 18.48 1.02W 40-49 17.38 8.70 0.50 W 40-49 15.37 8.70 0.57
W 50-59 19.96 9.74 0.49 W 50-59 19.40 9.74 0.50
W 60+8.88 16.93 1.91 W 60+ 9.95 16.93 1.71
Appendix vii
Population weightings applied in each country
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 53/62
53www.rdtrustedbrands.com
Netherlands 1 Netherlands 2Group Resp % Popn % Weight Group Resp % Popn % Weight
M 20-49 9.87 28.21 2.86 M 20-49 9.03 28.21 3.01
M 50-59 13.31 8.81 0.66 M 50-59 13.97 8.81 0.61
M 60-69 19.37 6.47 0.33 M 60-69 19.09 6.47 0.33
M 70+13.31 5.69 0.43 M 70+ 10.61 5.69 0.52
W 20-49 16.48 27.76 1.68 W 20-49 16.11 27.76 1.66
W 50-59 15.83 9.36 0.59 W 50-59 14.06 9.36 0.64
W 60-69 8.85 6.80 0.77 W 60-69 8.85 6.80 0.74
W 70+2.98 6.91 2.32 W 70+ 4.66 6.91 1.43
Poland 1 Poland 2
Group Resp % Popn % Weight Group Resp % Popn % Weight
M 20-29 10.26 11.28 1.10 M 20-29 10.92 11.28 1.04
M 30-39 8.95 10.22 1.14 M 30-39 11.14 10.22 0.93
M 40-49 10.48 9.46 0.90 M 40-49 6.11 9.46 1.56
M 50+13.97 18.72 1.34 M 50+ 17.69 18.72 1.07
W 20-29 14.85 10.53 0.71 W 20-29 15.28 10.53 0.70
W 30-39 13.32 9.57 0.72 W 30-39 12.23 9.57 0.79
W 40-49 13.97 8.71 0.62 W 40-49 12.01 8.71 0.73
W 50+14.19 21.53 1.52 W 50+ 15.50 21.53 1.40
Portugal RomaniaGroupResp % Popn % Weight
Group Resp % Popn % Weight Group Resp % Popn % Weight
M 20-39 7.32 19.57 2.67 M20-39 6.36 19.27 3.03
M 40-49 6.91 8.62 1.25 M 40-49 6.46 8.51 1.32
M 50-59 9.55 7.22 0.76 M 50-59 11.31 5.79 0.51
M 60-69 12.40 6.25 0.50 M 60-69 11.92 5.08 0.43
M 70+ 12.09 5.79 0.48 M 70+ 11.82 8.75 0.74
W 20-39 15.75 19.60 1.24 W 20-39 9.60 17.26 1.80
W 40-49 10.06 9.03 0.90 W 40-49 8.48 8.51 1.00
W 50-59 9.96 7.93 0.80 W 50-59 15.35 8.51 0.55W 60-69 9.15 7.35 0.80 W 60-69 12.12 6.03 0.50
W 70+ 6.81 8.63 1.27 W 70+ 6.57 12.29 1.87
Appendix vii
Population weightings applied in each country
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 60/62
60www.rdtrustedbrands.com
Country/Edition Circulation Adult Readers
Countries/editionsincluded in ETB 2010:
Austria 41,099 100,000
Belgium Dutch 38,072 165,600
Belgium French 34,579 156,200
Czech Republic* 101,691 177,000
Finland 210,961 606,000
France 335,361 1,541,000
Germany 770,803 2,510,000
Hungary 115,153 268,000
Netherlands 129,895 514,000
Poland 116,580 457,000
Portugal 93,235 270,000
Romania 96,000 246,000
Russia 411,000 928,100
Spain 41,000 118,000
Sweden 49,100 Not available
Swiss French 35,234 77,000
Swiss German 112,939 337,000
UK 541,282 1,569,000
*Circulation for Czech Republic includes Slovak Republic
Total countries included in the survey 3,273,984 10,039,900
Norway 23,000 Not available
Total editions across Europe 3,296,984 10,039,900
Appendix ix
Reader’s Digest circulation and
readership across Europe
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 61/62
61www.rdtrustedbrands.com
Country Belgium and Netherlands Country Czech Republic Ad Director Piet Bontje Ad Director Marie Kacerovska
e-mail [email protected] e-mail Marie [email protected]
Tel No. +31 20 567 8287 Tel No. +420 222 071 259
Research Responsibility Yvonne van der Wal Research Responsibility Lucie Srpova
e-mail [email protected] e-mail [email protected]
Tel No. +31 20 567 8232 Tel No. +420 222 071 284
PR Responsibility Yvonne van der Wal PR Responsibility Lucie Srpova
e-mail [email protected] e-mail [email protected]
Tel No. 31 20 567 8232 Tel No. +420 222 071 284
Country Finland Country France
Ad Director Carita Gil Ad Director Frederic Bonnin
e-mail [email protected] e-mail [email protected]
Tel No. +358 9 503 4656 Tel No. +331 4674 8840
Research Responsibility Tiina Suomela Research Responsibility Nathalie Langlois
e-mail [email protected] e-mail [email protected]
Tel No. +358 9 503 4655 Tel No. +331 4674 8681
PR Responsibility Tiina Suomela PR Responsibility Jean-Philippe Bertrand
e-mail [email protected] e-mail [email protected]
Tel No. +358 9 503 4655 Tel No. +331 4674 8643
Country Germany and Austria Country Hungary
Ad Director Anett Groch Ad Director Marta Pataie-mail [email protected] e-mail [email protected]
Tel No. +49 211 498 7914 Tel No. +36 1 66 61 730
Research Responsibility Solvey Friebe Research Responsibility Marta Patai
e-mail [email protected] e-mail [email protected]
Tel No. +49 211 498 7938 Tel No. +36 1 66 61 730
PR Responsibility Uwe Horn PR Responsibility Marta Patai
e-mail [email protected] e-mail [email protected]
Tel No. +49 711 6602 521 Tel No. +36 1 66 61 730
Country Poland Country Portugal
Ad Director Jolanta Gajewska Ad Director Maria Carmo Dinize-mail [email protected] e-mail [email protected]
Tel No. +48 22 319 3280 Tel No. + 351 21 381 0113
Research Responsibility Pawel Sztark Research Responsibility Maria Carmo Diniz
e-mail [email protected] e-mail [email protected]
Tel No. +48 22 319 3285 Tel No. + 351 21 381 0113
PR Responsibility Anna Nowicka PR Responsibility Maria Carmo Diniz
e-mail [email protected] e-mail [email protected]
Tel No. +48 22 319 3212 Tel No. + 351 21 381 0113
Reader's Digest Local Contacts 2010
8/8/2019 County Brands 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/county-brands-2010 62/62
Country Romania Country Russia Advertising Sales Ovidiu Muresanu Ad Director Maria Peterson
e-mail [email protected] e-mail [email protected]
Tel No. +40 20 19 814 Tel No. +7 495 258 5558
Research Responsibility Ovidiu Muresanu Research Responsibility Maria Razzhivina
e-mail [email protected] e-mail [email protected]
Tel No. +40 20 19 814 Tel No. +7 495 258 5558
PR Responsibility Ovidiu Muresanu PR Responsibility Maria Razzhivina
e-mail [email protected] e-mail [email protected]
Tel No. +40 20 19 814 Tel No. +7 495 258 5558
Country Spain Country Sweden
Advertising Sales Roger Aguadé Ad Director Carita Gil
e-mail [email protected] e-mail [email protected]
Tel No. +34 93 426 30 20 Tel No. +358 9 503 4656
Research Responsibility Maria Carmo Diniz Research Responsibility Tiina Suomela
e-mail [email protected] e-mail [email protected]
Tel No. + 351 21 381 0113 Tel No. +358 9 503 4655
PR Responsibility Cosme Ojeda PR Responsibility Lars Davidsson
e-mail [email protected] e-mail [email protected]
Tel No. +34 91 768 86 41 Tel No. + 46 8 587 10 883
Country Switzerland Country United Kingdom
Ad Director Sabine Kölsch Ad Director Flora MacMillane-mail [email protected] e-mail [email protected]
Tel No. +41 (0)44 455 7333 Tel No. +44 207 715 8161
Research Responsibility Solvey Friebe Research Responsibility Jeremy Hemingray
e-mail [email protected] e-mail
Tel No. +49 211 498 7938 Tel No. +44 207 715 8460
PR Responsibility Uwe Horn PR Responsibility Jeremy Hemingray
e-mail [email protected] e-mail
Tel No. +49 711 6602 521 Tel No. +44 207 715 8460
Country Europe
Director Gavin Murray
e-mail [email protected]
Tel No. +44 207 715 8927
Ad Sales Stephen Burgess
e-mail [email protected]
Tel No. +44 207 715 8150
Reader's Digest Local Contacts 2009