county & regional context
DESCRIPTION
social issues of St. Edward park. State Parks & Urban Open Space. County & Regional Context. Federal and National Parks - city to wildland. Parks Planning - Program. Active Recreation Passive Recreation Facilities and Events Unintended Activities. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
County & County & Regional Regional ContextContext
State State ParksParks& Urban& UrbanOpen Open SpaceSpace
Federal Federal and and National National Parks - Parks - city to city to wildlandwildland
social issues of St. Edward park
Parks Planning - ProgramParks Planning - Program Active RecreationActive Recreation Passive RecreationPassive Recreation Facilities and Facilities and
EventsEvents Unintended Unintended
ActivitiesActivitiesIntentions? Intentions? What’s Happening Now?What’s Happening Now?Revenue Potential? Revenue Potential?
Active RecreationActive Recreation Play ParkPlay Park Gymnasium, Swimming PoolGymnasium, Swimming Pool Sports Fields Sports Fields (baseball, soccer)(baseball, soccer)
Play ParkPlay Park
Sports Fields, Sports Fields, Reserved Group PicnicsReserved Group Picnics
Public EventsPublic Events
Public Public EventsEvents
PrivatePrivateEventEventRentalsRentals
Seminary,Seminary,HistoricHistoricRegisterRegister
Events and FacilitiesEvents and Facilities Play ParkPlay Park Gymnasium, Swimming PoolGymnasium, Swimming Pool Sports Fields Sports Fields (baseball, soccer)(baseball, soccer)
Other?Other?
Passive RecreationPassive Recreation Bike RidingBike Riding Hiking/WalkingHiking/Walking Dog WalkingDog Walking Horseback RidingHorseback Riding PicnicsPicnics BirdingBirding Shoreline ActivityShoreline Activity
Hiking/Dog WalkingHiking/Dog Walking
On Leash?On Leash?
Social TrailsSocial Trails
Social Trails Social Trails
Prevention? Prevention? Signs? Signs?
GraffittiGraffitti
Motor VehiclesMotor Vehicles
Rope SwingsRope Swings
Unintended ActivitiesUnintended Activities Motor VehiclesMotor Vehicles GraffittiGraffitti VandalismVandalism Water Activities (swings)Water Activities (swings) Personal Security on TrailsPersonal Security on Trails
Landscape Impacts:Landscape Impacts:Activity OutcomesActivity Outcomes
Shoreline ErosionShoreline Erosion
Shoreline ErosionShoreline Erosion
Salmon HabitatSalmon Habitat
WildlifeWildlifeHabitatHabitat
Trail ErosionTrail Erosion
Invasive Species - IvyInvasive Species - Ivy
Hazard TreesHazard Trees
Landscape ImpactsLandscape Impacts Shoreline ErosionShoreline Erosion Shoreline & SalmonShoreline & Salmon Trail ErosionTrail Erosion Wildlife HabitatWildlife Habitat Invasive SpeciesInvasive Species Hazard TreesHazard Trees
Off-site Social Issues - St. EdwardOff-site Social Issues - St. Edward Adjacent property owners?Adjacent property owners? Users from nearby areas?Users from nearby areas? Stakeholders and decision-Stakeholders and decision-
makers who aren’t on-site makers who aren’t on-site but make key decisions but make key decisions (budget, staff)(budget, staff)
County & County & Regional Regional ContextContext
State State ParksParks& Urban& UrbanOpen Open SpaceSpace
Federal Federal and and National National Parks - Parks - city to city to wildlandwildland
social issues of urban parks & recreation
National Trends - UrbanizationNational Trends - Urbanization
time series model - past to time series model - past to futurefuture
U.S. Urban Land Cover (2000)
Nowak, J. Forestry, Dec. 2005
U.S. Urban Land Cover (2000)
Nowak, J. Forestry, Dec. 2005
U.S. Urban Land Cover (2010)
U.S. Urban Land Cover (2020)
U.S. Urban Land Cover (2030)
U.S. Urban Land Cover (2040)
U.S. Urban Land Cover (2050)
Urban Urban Parks Parks ClassesClassesJapanJapan
Urban Urban Parks Parks ClassesClassesJapanJapan
Urban Parks Standards Urban Parks Standards USAUSA
=120+ sq m per person
vs. 61+ sq m King Co (1998)vs. 9 sq m in Japan
County & County & Regional Regional ContextContext
State State ParksParks& Urban& UrbanOpen Open SpaceSpace
Federal Federal and and National National Parks - Parks - city to city to wildlandwildland
social issues of urban parks & recreation
WA Growth Management ActWA Growth Management Act
Enacted 1990, 5 year updatesEnacted 1990, 5 year updates All communities in WAAll communities in WA Requires that cities and counties Requires that cities and counties
adopt policies and develop programs adopt policies and develop programs that:that:– Direct new growth to urbanized areas– Promote health, safety, and high quality
of life– Protecting lands and the natural
environment
King County Population TrendsKing County Population Trends
King County Urban Growth BoundaryKing County Urban Growth Boundary
King County - 180 parks, 175 miles of trails, 25,000 acres
King County Parks
King County King County Parks/RecreationParks/Recreationquantity and location quantity and location (180 sites, 175 miles (180 sites, 175 miles trails)trails)
connectivity of open spaces connectivity of open spaces (25,000 acres)(25,000 acres)
user demands and potential conflictsuser demands and potential conflictsmanagement costs!management costs!who owns it?who owns it?
St. St. Edward Edward parcel - parcel - local local contextcontext
St. Edward St. Edward parcel - parcel -
public public open open space space neededneeded
316 acres316 acres
3,000 ft 3,000 ft shore (last shore (last undevelopundevelopededon Lake on Lake WA)WA)
conservaticonservationoneasementeasement
Conservation EasementConservation Easementlegally enforceable land preservation legally enforceable land preservation agreementagreementvoluntary by ownervoluntary by ownerdonate rights but retain ownershipdonate rights but retain ownershipincentives? tax abatement, legacy incentives? tax abatement, legacy (contribute to public good)(contribute to public good)purpose: protect ag, forests, habitat, purpose: protect ag, forests, habitat, ecosystem servicesecosystem servicesrestricts real estate development, restricts real estate development, commercial use, other activities to mutually commercial use, other activities to mutually agreed levelagreed level
Challenges to NIPF Landowners
•Development value of land
•Forest condition•Regulations: stream buffers, County regs•Opposition from neighbors•Lack of infrastructure/mills - large logs
discounted•Economies of scale•Changing products
Two foci...
1. Limit fragmentation of industrial forestland.
2. Work with small rural forest landowners to promote forest stewardship.
Agency/Non-profit efforts
Supporting NIPF Landowners
Technical assistance and Forest Stewardship Classes •203 forest landowners •316 parcels•5910 acres
Conservation Futures dollars to acquire development rights
Enhanced CUT program - Timberland, PBRS Forest
Transfer of Development Rights Program (TDR)
NIPF Landowners Incentives
Commercial/Industrial Forest Owners• Weyerhaeuser and Plum Creek are moving out.• Between 2000 and 2002 - 47 permit applications and 28 parcels segregated (non-forest uses!)
Non-industrial private forest (NIPF) owners• Since 1996, decrease in 500+ acre owners (11,500 > 8150 acres)
• Corresponding increase in 4 - 20 acre parcels (872 >1245 parcels).
King County Private Forest Trends
Rural NIPF Landowners75% own less than 40 acres70% have owned the land less than 20 years52% live on their forestland30% have sold timber from their land
Urban Parks - JapanUrban Parks - Japan