“Court of Record”

In The 16th Judicial Circuit Court of Missouri

Denny Ray Hardin, ] W. Stephen Nixon, Magistrate ] In “Admiralty Jurisdiction”

American Citizen ] ]

vs. ] Case No. 0616-CR1640-01 ] Division No. 14 ]

STATE OF MISSOURI, ] ] Judicial Notice of Condemnation

Foreign State ]

“JUDICIAL NOTICE” OF “CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS”

By

“Affidavit of Denny Ray Hardin”

Now Comes, Denny Ray Hardin an “American Citizen”, not a “UNITED

STATES CITIZEN” to now enter all his complaints of criminal conduct in this

cause of action “For the Record” under his right to give evidence within 42 USC

1981. The lawful duty of this “Court of Record” to act upon this information and

take action to prosecute these crimes is lawfully established in 18 USC 4, clearly

defined as “Misprision of Felony”. “All codes, rules and regulations are applicable

to the government authorities only, not human/Creators in accordance with God’s

laws. All codes, rules and regulations are unconstitutional and lacking due

process…” Rodriques v. Ray Donovan (U.S. Department of Labor) 796 F. 2d

1344, 1348 (1985). This ruling by the one “Supreme Court for the United States of

America” authorized by the “Constitution for the United States of America” under

Article III is lawfully binding on all judicial officers. This lawfully establishes all

officers must comply with all rules, codes and regulations as inferior courts for the

United States of America.

For The Record:

“Setting for this Court of Record”

“Court of Record” as defined in Black’s Law 4th Edition Page 426

“Courts of record and courts not of record. The former being those whose acts and judicial proceedings are enrolled, or recorded, for a perpetual memory and testimony, and which have power to fine and imprison for contempt. Error lies in their judgments, and they generally possess a seal. Courts not of record are those of inferior dignity, which have no power to fine or imprison, and in which the proceedings are not enrolled or recorded. 3 Bl. Comm. 24; 3 Steph. Comm. 383; The Thomas Fletcher, C.C.Ga., 24 F. 481; Ex parte Thirstleton, 52 Cal. 225; Ewin v. U.S., D.C.Ga., 37 F. 488, 2 L.R.A. 229; Heininger v. Davis, 96 Ohio St. 205, 117 N.E. 229, 231.

“A “Court of Record” is a judicial tribunal having attributes and exercising functions independently of the person of the magistrate designated to hold it, and proceeding according to the course of common law, its acts and proceedings being enrolled for a perpetual memorial.” Jones v. Jones 188 Mo.App. 220, 175 S.W. 227, 229; Ex parte Gladhill, 8 Metc., Mass. 171, per Shaw, C.J. See also, Ledwith v. Rosalsky, 244 N.Y. 406, 155 N.E. 688, 689.”

This common law is admissible under rules of “Evidence” in the Revised Statues of Missouri 490.080 “Judicial notice to be taken. – Every Court of this state shall take judicial notice of common law and statues of every state, territory and other jurisdiction of the United States.”

The judicial duty of all judicial officers is to comply with the “STATE OF MISSOURI’S” rules, codes and regulations. The Revised Statues of Missouri 476.010, states “THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI, THE COURT OF APPEALS, AND CIRCUIT COURTS SHALL BE COURTS OF RECORD, AND SHALL KEEP JUST AND FAITHFUL REOCORDS OF THEIR PROCEEDINGS.”

Because W. Stephen Nixon has threatened Denny Ray Hardin with imprisonment, this “Court of Record” is lawfully established to hear all facts, all law and all evidence for lawful determination.

Setting of the Common Law:

The Common Law of this cause of action shall be as follows:

The “Constitution for the United States of America” is entered as the Supreme law of the land as clearly established in Article VI, of the “Constitution for the United States of America”. It is entered into evidence under RSMO 490.180 as a document on file in the office of secretary of state and issued to the public under its seal. It is entered in its entirety as if it was read entirely into the record.

W. Stephen Nixon is lawfully bound by Article VI, to have an “Oath of Office” to support this constitution, his exact “Oath of Office” is clearly stated in 28 USC 372 as a “judge” of an “inferior court” of the “United States of America”.

The “Constitution of Missouri” is entered as the Supreme law of Missouri as clearly established by its “Preamble” to be the people of Missouri for the better government of the state. It is entered into evidence under RSMO 490.180 as a document on file in the office of secretary of state and issued to the public under its seal. It is entered in its entirety as if it was read entirely into the record.

W. Stephen Nixon is lawfully bound by Article VII, Section 11 to have an “Oath of Office” to support this Constitution. This “Oath of Office” is lawfully required before entering the “Public Office” of “Judge” by Revised Statues of Missouri 476.280.

The “United State Codes” and “Revised Statues of Missouri” will be presented as evidence of criminal conduct of those who have “trespassed” upon the rights, privileges and immunities, of Denny Ray Hardin, secured by the “common law” outlined above. These are lawfully binding on all government authorities as clearly determined by the one Supreme Court for the United States of America. The decisions of the one Supreme Court are lawfully binding on all “inferior courts” of the United States of America.

Evidence of Criminal Conduct: Facts:

As clearly established by “Transcripts”.

1. Lowell Gard, Foreign Agent 22 USC 611

KANSAS CITY PROSECUTING ATTORNEYStar Witness of the Prosecution, charged with perjury to obtain a conviction of a felony crime, lied under oath claiming “Kansas City Codes” are not “Administrative Codes” under Article 1, Section 31 of the Constitution of Missouri. Thus my reason for the statement I will abolish the “KANSAS CITY MUNICIPAL COURT”, for Lowell Gard imposing fines and imprisonment for violations of “Administrative Codes” barred by Article I, Section 31 of the Constitution of Missouri. He is the mastermind behind the “Conspiracy to convict” and has solicited the participation of all others including the “KANSAS CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT”, “JACKSON COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY’S OFFICE” and “JUDGES” of the “JACKSON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT OF KANSAS CITY”. He has been formally charged by “Affidavit” with “perjury to obtain a conviction of a felony crime” under RSMO 575.040 7. (2). A class “B” felony in the “STATE OF MISSOURI”.

2. Joseph Laccasco, Foreign Agent 22 USC 611

KANSAS CITY MUNICIPAL JUDGEThis was the person I supposedly threatened, who stated under oath that I have never threatened him, or cause him any harm.

3. Robert Beaird, Foreign Agent 22 USC 611

ASSOCIATE CIRCUIT COURT JUDGEHe was terminated, by Denny Ray Hardin, for incompetence and ineffective assistance of counsel in 1991. He issued the warrant as a personal vendetta without “probable cause”, without a signed complaint signed under the penalty of perjury. The “Criminal Complaint” was answered and the evidence suppressed to protect this clear “Conflict of interest”. He issued an unsigned warrant, evidenced by legal file “MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS”. After the arrest, on the floor of the Missouri Senate, Robert Beaird passed his fraud to Preston Dean to arraign me, acknowledging his conflict of interest. This is where the “Conspiracy against rights” 18 USC 241 began in this cause of action.

4. Preston Dean, Foreign Agent 22 USC 611

ASSOCIATE CIRCUIT COURT JUDGERefused a “Court of Record”, quashed the lawfully issued subpoenas that could have proved the criminal conduct of Lowell Gard, thus clearly establishing denial of due process of law, by violation of the 5th and 6th Amendments to have witnesses in one’s favor for defense of a criminal prosecution. The one Supreme

Court for the United States of America has repeatedly held once due process of law is denied all jurisdiction ceases. All judges are deemed to know the law and can only act with malice, intent and knowledge to violate it. Preston Dean refused his lawfully established duty to dismiss this cause of action and became an active participant of “Conspiracy against rights” in violation of 18 USC 241.

5. Charleen Wright, Foreign Agent 22 USC 611

JACKSON COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEYHandled the arraignment, fraudulently claiming “Agency” with the “STATE OF MISSOURI”, requested judge deny me my right of subpoena by quashing the subpoenas. Preston Dean agreed to this violation of the 5th & 6th Amendments. After this violation, and my request for the “Transcript” Charleen Wright was replaced by two other “Foreign Agents”. She had done her part to keep this “Conspiracy against rights” 18 USC 241 proceeding in violation of all law.

6. Jordon Stanley, Foreign Agent 22 USC 6117. Byron Woehlecke, Foreign Agent 22 USC 611

This dynamic duo, tag teamed my prosecution, fraudulently claiming to represent the “STATE OF MISSOURI” to prosecute the “Corporate Fiction” (DENNY RAY HARDIN). This constitutes “Mail Fraud” under “UPU Regulations”. In pretrial motions they requested the subpoenas issue twice quashed and thus worked in conspiracy against rights with John Torrence who quashed the subpoenas. The transcripts provide a vivid account of this conspiracy to convict, but provides no evidence of any injury to person or damage to property. This is clearly conspiracy by the “BAR ASSOCIATION” membership to convict me to cover up their “Racketeering Activities” being conducted without authority of law. These “Foreign Agents” have been formally charged by “Affidavit” for “Perjury to obtain a conviction of a felony crime” in violation of RSMO 575.040 7. (2).

8. John M. Torrence, Foreign Agent 22 USC 611

This foreign agent, impersonated a “judge”, claiming authority to violate the “Original 13th Amendment” prohibiting him to be a judge. The transcripts do not provide the arguments of law presented to this foreign agent, just his ruling that the objections of the other foreign agents are sustained. This foreign agent repeatedly informed me that I should have an attorney, thus clearly attempting to make me a ward of the court by being represented by an incompetent member of the “BAR ASSOCIATION”. I remain competent to this day, in a court of incompetent foreign agents. John M. Torrence entered a “judgment” in this cause of action and refused to provide “Findings of facts” and “conclusions of law” in clear violation of RSMO 536.090 (A) & (B) and 5 USC 557(c)(3). To date there is

no lawful authority to hold Denny Ray Hardin in “slavery” in violation of 18 USC 1585. The “16th Judicial Circuit Court of Missouri” is a “Public Vessel” under the “Public Vessel’s Act” and is now lawfully designated as “Vessels for Slave trade” in violation of 18 USC 1582. Without authority of law John M. Torrence has taken possession of the person of Denny Ray Hardin and unlawfully required him to perform “forced labor” in violation of 18 USC 1589. John M. Torrence is now lawfully charged by this “Affidavit” with “trafficking with respect to peonage, slavery, involuntary servitude or forced labor” in violation of 18 USC 1590. The “SENTENCING/JUDGMENT” entered by John M. Torrence is evidence of violations of law punishable under 18 US 1581 for trafficking in persons. This “conspiracy against rights” 18 USC 241 is to hold Denny Ray Hardin in involuntary servitude without authority of law.

9. All foreign agents of the “MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS”

By their decision, they clearly refused the Constitutional rights, privileges and immunities, claiming they could not understand. As foreign agents they allowed the conspiracy of their “BAR ASSOCIATION” “co-conspirators”, to continue by dismissing the appeal. By refusing to “Affirm” or “Deny” the “Judgment” of John M. Torrence, they allowed the illusion to continue that this conduct is lawful, when in fact it was total denial of all due process of law, without jurisdiction, without authority to falsify public records with their fraudulent claims not supported by any law. They claim rules, statues, cases and codes are superior to the constitutional mandates presented. This is Fraud 18 USC 1001 in clear “Conspiracy against rights” 18 USC 241 to deny and deprive “American Citizens” their rights, privileges and immunities in the courts of Missouri.

10. All foreign agents of the MISSOURI SUPREME COURT.

The clerk of the court dismissed all three of my appeals by his signature, thus clearly acting in “Obstruction of Justice” by denying access to the “Supreme Court of Missouri”, his act has deprived me of my right to appeal to a higher court and have them examine my appeal and issue a “Judgment”. The clerk of the court has determined “American Citizens” are not entitled to appeals. We should pay our money, do all the work, then accept the clerk’s review of our cases.

11. All foreign agents of the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT.

This conspiracy against rights was presented to Dean Whipple (foreign agent) of the federal district court, who dismissed an unanswered “Complaint” claiming lack of jurisdiction, when it was clearly established. The Governor of Missouri, (Matt Blunt), Attorney General (Jeremiah W. Nixon), the Missouri Supreme Court (Chief Justice), the Missouri Court of Appeals (Presiding Judge) and Jackson

County, Missouri (Chief Judge) were all lawfully served. No answer denying the conspiracy was filed, the case was simply dismissed by Dean Whipple clearly establishing “Misprision of Felonies” 18 USC 4.

12. Foreign Agent of the EIGHTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

The foreign agent of this court dismissed the complaint of clear “Judicial Misconduct” and upheld Judge Dean Whipple’s dismissal of my case. Clearly establishing “Discrimination” by treating me different than any other “Plaintiff”. We all know if we do not answer a complaint against us a “Default Judgment” is entered against us. Foreign Agents do this to us everyday. But foreign agents’ criminal conduct is dismissed without even appearing, thus clearly denying due process of law. This clearly shows the “Conspiracy against rights” 18 USC 241 being conducted in all courts of the “United States of America” by “foreign agents” 22 USC 611 unlawfully holding the “Public Office” of “Judge” in violation of the 13th Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America.

13. W. Stephen Nixon, Foreign Agent 22 USC 611

Concurrent with the above a civil action was filed at the county seat against the corporate “JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI” for civil damages caused by John M. Torrence and his co-conspirators. This foreign agent was lawfully challenged for conspiracy against the Constitution of Missouri, when he dismissed this corporation’s violations. For his violations he was appointed “Chief Judge” of “JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI”. Now he is the convening authority of the “Probation Violation Hearing” in clear “Conflict of Interest” to further the “BAR ASSOCIATION’s” “Conspiracy against rights” 18 USC 241. On July 28, 2009, W. Stephen Nixon, issued an “Order” without findings of facts and conclusions of law, to “Quash Subpoenas” lawfully served in this cause of action evidenced by “Case.Net” in this “Court of Record”. This lawfully establishes due process of law has been denied and all jurisdiction of W. Stephen Nixon ceases for violation of Article I, Section 18 of the Constitution of Missouri and the 5th and 6th Amendments of the Constitution for the United States of America. To date those subpoenaed have evaded the incrimination of “account” for their criminal conduct. In this “Court of Record” W. Stephen Nixon fraudulently claims the authority to enforce the “SENTENCING/JUDGMENT” of John M. Torrence in the “Probation Violation Hearing”. This is “Fraud” 18 USC 1001 and clear evidence of furthering the “Conspiracy against rights” 18 USC 241 clearly present in this cause of action.

Law in opposition of W. Stephen Nixon’s “Order” of July 28, 2009.

The Constitution of Missouri is crystal clear in Article V, Section 5, it states, “The supreme court may establish rules relating to practice, procedure and pleadings for all courts and administrative tribunals, which shall have the force and effect of law. The rules may not change substantive rights, or the law relating to evidence, the oral examination of witnesses, juries, the right of trial by jury, or the right of appeal.”

By this law, W. Stephen Nixon has no rule to claim the authority to quash a subpoena lawfully issued in a criminal case. Denny Ray Hardin declares his rights to examine witnesses under the following “Constitutional Mandates”:

Constitution of Missouri

Article I, Section 18(a). “Rights of accused in criminal prosecutions. – That in criminal prosecutions the accused shall have the right to appear and defend, in person and by counsel; to demand the nature and cause of the accusation; to meet the witnesses against him face to face; to have process to compel the attendance of witnesses in his behalf; and to a speedy public trial by an impartial jury of the county.”

By this law, the “Rights” of “Denny Ray Hardin” have been violated by W. Stephen Nixon by denying the attendance of witnesses. Evidenced by his attached “Order” at “Exhibit 1”. This is admissible evidence under RSMO 490.130 as a “Court of Record’s” court record, entered by W. Stephen Nixon.

Constitution for the United States of America

Amendment VI “…to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have assistance of counsel for his defense.”

Facts:

Both John M. Torrence and W. Stephen Nixon have violated the above Constitutional Mandates, lawfully requiring them to enforce lawfully issued “subpoenas” in a criminal prosecution. This is clearly discrimination by allowing “Foreign Agents” to ignore a subpoena, while requiring the people to appear when summoned. This is clearly a “Conspiracy” of those “subpoenaed” to deny facts, law and evidence of this cause of action. By protecting the “Conspiracy against rights” 18 USC 241, W. Stephen Nixon has lawfully established his participation in that conspiracy. Any act done in the furtherance of a conspiracy, is evidence of participation in that conspiracy. Common law dictates a judge is deemed to know the law and can only act with malice, intent and knowledge to violate it. John M. Torrence has been removed from this cause for his criminal conduct and now W.

Stephen Nixon fraudulently claims authority to further enforce the enslavement of Denny Ray Hardin to the point of threatening “peonage”. Since John M. Torrence has been removed, his conduct is clearly an attempt to evade the lawful requirement to provide the authority of law, that has held Denny Ray Hardin in “Slavery” and “involuntary servitude” for the past three years. Because John M. Torrence refused to provide “Findings of facts and conclusions of law” there is no lawful authority of this cause of action. The named participants of this criminal “Conspiracy against rights” all have one thing in common, they are all “Foreign Agents” 22 USC 611 as members of the “British Atoned Registry” also known as the “BAR ASSOCIATION”.

SUMMATION

It has taken all these “Foreign Agents” unlawfully engaging in “Conspiracy against rights” to unlawfully restrain the person of Denny Ray Hardin. Each was presented with the facts, law and evidence and each chose to ignore it and allow the conspiracy to continue. Each foreign agent fraudulently claims to represent some “Public Office” and have all refused the lawful duties of that office of trust. Each have acted under the impression that they are above the law, I know “NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW”. I have been branded a “criminal”, so the true criminals outlined above can continue their “Organized Crime for Profit”. I have already presented W. Stephen Nixon with the “NOTICE OF DISHONOR OF ALL FOREIGN AGENTS” and must now make myself available to be violated once again. But at least this time, you know why I am being persecuted by “Foreign Agents” and trying my best to stop this “Racketeering Activity” by the “BAR ASSOCIATION” membership. I have placed myself in harms way repeatedly to lawfully challenge the criminals named above and will not stop until they cease hurting the people. This is an impossibility within the “United States of America” because all courts and all government are controlled by these “Foreign Agents”.

DEMAND FOR “INQUISITION”

I, Denny Ray Hardin an “American Citizen”, demand these “Foreign Agents” named be brought before a “Judicial Court”, of proper jurisdiction to answer for the crimes outlined above. Within the common law principle of “Inquisition”, these “liars” are challenged by the common law principle of “Agency” to prove their authority to violate our laws as outlined above. Upon examination in open court, under the penalty of perjury, their crimes will be lawfully established. Refusal to bring these foreign agents forward for inquisition, will constitute denial of due process of law yet again, by refusing an “American Citizen” his right to give evidence against those who have injured him within 42

USC 1981. This will be clear evidence of oppression and suppression of facts, law and evidence to protect the “Organized Crime” of the “MISSOURI BAR ASSOCIATION” and all its “Foreign Agent” membership. This right has been refused to date and is grounds to “Dishonor” of these “Public Offices” of the “STATE OF MISSOURI” for denial of due process of law. It is grounds for “relief from judgment” for “fraud” under Rule 74.06 (b)(2) for misconduct of an adverse party and grounds to end the “involuntary servitude” of Denny Ray Hardin. Either due process of law is granted or it is not. W. Stephen Nixon has shown his refusal to conduct honest business in accordance with 18 USC 1346, therefore his judgment is deemed biased and prejudicial to Denny Ray Hardin, in favor of his brethren of the “British Atoned Registry”.

Relief Requested

Because there is no law that supports the judgment of John M. Torrence, there is no law to support the conduct of W. Stephen Nixon to enforce his “judgment”. Either, the judgment is lawful and can with stand “cross examination” or it is unlawful and can not be lawfully established. W. Stephen Nixon has the same option as the “prosecuting attorney” to dismiss this case if the facts, law and evidence do not establish evidence of a crime. If one of the people refuse to appear in court a “warrant” is issued for our arrest. Failure to conduct this due process of law will constitute clear “discrimination”. Every witness subpoenaed will be called, W. Stephen Nixon will then be given the opportunity to issue a “bench warrant” for “Contempt of Court” within RSMO 476.110 or deny due process of law and violate Denny Ray Hardin’s Constitutional rights, privileges and immunities as outlined above. Failure to grant due process of law is grounds for dismissal of this cause of action for lack of jurisdiction. At this time, I am entitled to dismissal of this “Conspiracy against rights” 18 USC 241 for denial of due process of law.

Demand for Trial by Jury

Because W. Stephen Nixon has suppressed and oppressed all facts, law and evidence by refusing the right to challenge the unlawful “Judgment” of John M. Torrence, he is no longer considered an unbiased magistrate in this “Court of Record”. He has chose to remain a “Judge”, and therefore is lawfully bound by his “Oath of Office” to perform the duties of that “Public Office” in compliance with law. Therefore, I demand my right to trial by jury, to have process to compel witnesses for my defense and to have my fate determined by an unbiased jury of the county in accordance with Article I, Section 18(a) of the Constitution of Missouri and the 6th Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Refusal to grant a “trial by jury” will constitute denial of due process of

law in violation of the 5th Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America.

Pre-trail Issue: Lawful challenge to Jurisdiction of W. Stephen Nixon

Based upon the foregoing, I can not see any logical reason for this matter to proceed to trial, other than the desire of foreign agents to further violate my rights and unlawfully detain my person in “bondage”. For three years I have fought with every common law principle only to be denied by incompetent foreign agents, fraudulently claiming to speak for the “STATE OF MISSOURI” against me. Under the common law principle of “Agency” the “STATE OF MISSOURI” must appear to establish “Agency” with the “Foreign Agents” to speak on its behalf. Failure of the “STATE OF MISSOURI” to appear and be subject to cross examination clearly establishes there is no “Plaintiff” in this cause of action, it is all “fraud” 18 USC 1001. Byron Woehlecke is responsible to establish the “Court of Record” has jurisdiction to proceed. “Jurisdiction” may not be assumed, it must be established. Failure to establish proper jurisdiction will lawfully establish W. Stephen Nixon is proceeding in this cause of action without “jurisdiction”. Therefore, before this matter proceeds to trial, I demand a “true statement” of W. Stephen Nixon’s “Jurisdiction” to proceed to trial of this cause of action. No statement of “Jurisdiction” on this Court of Record’s, court record will clearly establish no jurisdiction or authority of law exists to proceed, all acts after are without jurisdiction or authority of law. Jurisdiction can only be established by Byron Woehlecke producing the “Plaintiff” “STATE OF MISSOURI” he has been lawfully subpoenaed to bring for “cross examination”, anything less is clear “fraud” 18 USC 1001, by him and the court claiming authority to act without jurisdiction. No-one is bound to obey fraud.

Judicial Notice of Condemnation:

This “Court of Record” has been singled out as an example of “Justice Foreign Agent Style”, whereby all law is violated to obtain a conviction. It has been presented as the “Common Practice” of all States to “Bond Slaves for Profit”. This has already been presented to the “International Court of Justice”, in the Netherlands and to the “Universal Postal Union”. The court should take judicial notice of the attached “CONDEMNATION of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA”. Because our government has failed its responsibility to protect the people and enforce the law of commerce, the “British Atoned Registry” has now been taken before the world for examination, investigation, prosecution and punishment under “International Law”. By this “Notice” you are lawfully informed your actions are now subject to review by a “Hague Convention” that could be formed to hear this cause of action. As a “Judge” you are deemed to

know the law and can only act with malice, intent and knowledge to violate it. This is attached as “Exhibit 2”. Demand for Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law:

I, Denny Ray Hardin, demand findings of facts and conclusions of law lawfully required by 5 USC 557(c)(3) and the Revised Statues of Missouri 536.090 to support the “ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO QUASH SUBPONEAS” issued by W. Stephen Nixon and attached as “Exhibit 1”. Failure to produce findings of facts and conclusions of law will establish there is no lawful authority to violate the right of subpoena, and the subpoenas remain in force and must be enforced by W. Stephen Nixon. Failure of those “subpoenaed”, to appear and take the stand will constitute “Contempt of Court” RSMO 476.110(5) and disobedience of a lawful “Order” RSMO 476.110(3) to appear in this “Court of Record”.

Current Situation:

I face five years in prison to put the facts, law and evidence of this case of “Conspiracy against rights” 18 USC 241 on trial. For a “Chief Judge” to refuse facts, law and evidence without ever hearing it is clear indication of the “conspiracy” to suppress evidence and convict based upon fraud and perjury. I remain competent in this “Court of Record” and no “Jurisdiction” has been lawfully established to place me in “peonage”. Yet my life, liberty and freedom, remain in jeopardy to “Foreign Agents” who refuse to allow due process of law in the “inferior courts” of the “United States of America”. They conduct these courts as their personal venues to violate, abuse and terrorize the “American People”. There is no greater threat to the safety of the “American People”, than the “Conspiracy against rights” of “Foreign Agents” of the “British Atoned Registry” operating our Courts without jurisdiction or authority of law. Should I be placed in “peonage”, I will file a “Class Action” on behalf of all prisoners prosecuted by the “Foreign State”, “STATE OF MISSOURI” for clear denial of the right to “cross examine” of one’s accuser and denial of due process of law. John Paul Jones said, He who will not risk, can not win.” I risk five years of my life, will the state risk all prisoners incarcerated, will the state risk exposure of “Racketeering activity” 18 USC 1961 in the Jackson County Circuit Court, will the state risk exposure of “Organized Crime” of “Bonding Slaves for profit”? All “Affidavits” filed in this cause of action remain unrebutted to date and stand as truth in commerce. “JUDGMENT MUST FOLLOW TRUTH”. For the Record this “Affidavit” is a criminal complaint of criminal conduct by “foreign agents” who have utilized their “Public Offices” to unlawful act against me. This has caused me three years without freedom, three years of torture by holding me without authority of law and severe mental anguish by being branded a “criminal” and “slave” without

jurisdiction. Time will tell if due process of law is granted or not, to date it has been denied.

PRINCIPLES RELIED UPON

Maxims of Law:

“IN COMMERCE FOR A MATTER TO BE RESOLVED MUST BE EXPRESSED” Heb. 4:16; Phil 4:6; Eph. 6:19-21. Legal Maxim: “He who fails to assert his rights has none.”

“ALL ARE EQUAL UNDER THE LAW” (God’s Law – Moral and Natural Law) Exodus 21:23-25; Lev 24: 17-21: Deut 1:17, 19:21, Mat. 22:36-40; Luke 10:17; Col 3:25. “NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW”

“IN COMMERCE TRUTH IS SOVEREIGN” Exodus 20:16; Ps. 117:2; John 8:32; II Cor. 13:8.Truth is sovereign – and the Sovereign tells only the truth. Your word is your bond.

“TRUTH IS EXPRESSED IN THE FORM OF AN AFFIDAVIT”Lev. 5:4-5; Lev 6:3-5; Lev. 19:11-13; Num. 30:2; Mat. 5:33; James 5:12.

“AN UNREBUTTED AFFIDAVIT STANDS AS TRUTH IN COMMERCE”12 Pet. 1:25; Heb. 6:13-15. Claims made in your affidavit, if not rebutted, emerge as the truth of the matter. Legal Maxim: “He who does not deny, admits.”

“AN UNREBUTTED AFFIDAVIT BECOMES THE JUDGMENT IN COMMERCE” Heb. 6:16-17. There is nothing left to resolve.

28 USC 1746

I, Denny Ray Hardin, declare under the penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge , understanding and beliefs. This “Affidavit” is made without purpose of evasion or intent to mislead, if some fact is proved by facts, law and evidence to be incorrect, I reserve the right to amend it for the “truth” to be clearly stated. This “Affidavit” must be accepted as “Truth”, unless a “Counter Affidavit” signed under the penalty of perjury, is presented in dispute. “Truth” is the law of “Commerce”. “Judgment” must follow the “Truth”. This “Affidavit” must be accepted as “Truth” in all Courts. Failure to do so is denial of the truth.

God’s will be done.

_________________________Denny Ray Hardin, Agent

2450 Elmwood Kansas City, MO, 16127 (816)231-2258

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Denny Ray Hardin, do hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was hand delivered, on this 3rd day of August 2009 to the following:

Byron WoehleckeAssistant Prosecuting Attorney1315 LocustKansas City, Missouri 64106

___________________________ Denny Ray Hardin, Agent