curriculum collaboration: combining strengths to develop student learning. dr amanda tinker and dr...
TRANSCRIPT
Curriculum Collaboration: Combining strengths to develop student learning.
Dr Amanda Tinker and Dr Pat HillALDinHE Conference
University of Southampton30 March - 1April 2015
Overview
• Issues• Examples• Exercise• Round up• Going forward and resources
Context
http://aldinhe-embeddingskills.hud.ac.uk
Successful integration requires collaboration
Issues of collaboration
• Who initiates the collaboration?• At what stage do discussions take place?• Who is involved in the discussions?• How are ideas communicated?• What context is given?• What degree of involvement?• What level of integration is there?• Who delivers?
Initiator What stage Who isinvolved
Medium Contextgiven
Degreeinvolved
Integration Delivery
Course Team
Programme stage
LD Face to facearranged
Assignment brief Preparation Stand alonegeneral
solo
Course Leader
Curriculum design
Subject staff
Face to facecasual
VLE access Delivery Stand aloneSpecificcohort
observed
Module leader
TermSemester in advance
Library Email Teaching on course
Assessment Outsidecurriculum
Team taught
LD Weeks in advance
Careers Telephone Subject staff issues
Evaluation Within curriculum
Careers/Library/IT
Days in advance
IT staff Student issues
Student Last minute Student No context
Initiator What stage?
Who isInvolved?
Medium Contextgiven
Degreeinvolved
Integration Delivery
Course Team
Programme stage
LD Face to facearranged
Assignment brief
Preparation Stand alonegeneral
solo
Course Leader
Curriculum design
Subject staff
Face to facecasual
VLE access Delivery Stand aloneSpecificcohort
observed
Module leader
TermSemester in advance
Library Email Teaching on course
Assessment Outsidecurriculum
Team taught
LD Weeks in advance
Careers Telephone Subject staff issues
Evaluation Within curriculum
Careers/Library/IT
Days in advance
IT staff Student issues Within curriculum planned
Student Last minute Student No context
Initiator What stage Who isinvolved
Medium Contextgiven
Degreeinvolved
Integration Delivery
Course Team
Programme stage
LD Face to facearranged
Assignment brief Preparation Stand alonegeneral
solo
Course Leader
Curriculum design
Subject staff
Face to facecasual
VLE access Delivery Stand aloneSpecificcohort
observed
Module leader
TermSemester in advance
Library Email Teaching on course
Assessment Outsidecurriculum
Team taught
LD Weeks in advance
Careers Telephone Subject staff issues
Evaluation Within curriculum
Careers/Library/IT
Days in advance
IT staff Student issues
Student Last minute Student No context
Initiator What stage Who isinvolved
Medium Contextgiven
Degreeinvolved
Integration Delivery
Manager Programme stage
LD Face to facearranged
Assignment brief Preparation Stand alonegeneral
solo
Course Leader
Curriculum design
Subject staff
Face to facecasual
VLE access Delivery Stand aloneSpecificcohort
observed
Module leader
TermSemester in advance
Library Email Teaching on course
Assessment Outsidecurriculum
Team taught
LD Weeks in advance
Careers Telephone Subject staff issues
Evaluation Within curriculum
Careers/Library/IT
Days in advance
IT staff Student issues
Student Last minute Student No context
Exercise
• Individually, use template to map one or two scenarios using RAG
• In groups discuss:
• what works well (G) • what could be improved (A) • what constitutes a barrier to learning (R)
• Good to be involved quite early on• Being assertive and turning down last minute
requests has worked, as now being consulted for next year
• Now being involved in curriculum design using blended learning – aim to embed through entire institution
• Resources tested and piloted to ensure they can be customised
• Collaborative resources and activities shared through Adobe Connect.
• Ambitious T&L change programme – working with curriculum teams to embed. ‘Top down’ approach can provide useful leverage as LD can be seen as the ‘good cop’ helping to fulfil unrealistic management expectations of subject staff
• Seen as facilitators and collaborators rather than stand alone
Key issues that came from discussion:
• Lack of bodies e.g. 1.4 LD staff for 22,000 students
• Administrative staff organise sessions based on previous timing, not on pedagogic requirements
• There is a lack of joined up thinking• It is hard to build our identity – people
have fixed ideas about who we are and what we do
• We build up individual relationships but if that person goes we have to start again.
Some ways forward?
Be assertiveNetwork with other Uni’s
Make connections
Evaluate impact
Promote your successes
Cultivate a champion in the SLT
Engage student help
Collaborate
Build up knowledge/qualifications
Write/publish
ALDinHE Embedding Web Resource
• Current Research• Generic principles• Embedding Skills?• Progressive Learning
Development• Challenges and Solutions• Embedding Journeys • Case studies, videos,
templates and workshop materialshttp://
aldinhe-embeddingskills.hud.ac.uk