data source data points/acre...july 17, 2015 aug. 6, 2015 sept. 8, 2012 check image fungicide was...

25

Upload: others

Post on 08-Aug-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Data Source Data Points/Acre...July 17, 2015 Aug. 6, 2015 Sept. 8, 2012 Check Image Fungicide was applied to west half of milo field in late July. Determined differences were from
Page 2: Data Source Data Points/Acre...July 17, 2015 Aug. 6, 2015 Sept. 8, 2012 Check Image Fungicide was applied to west half of milo field in late July. Determined differences were from

Data Source Data Points/Acre

5 meter image 806

Yield data 196

30 meter image 135

EC/EM Soil Mapping

(13 mph)43

2.5 acre grid sample .4

Page 3: Data Source Data Points/Acre...July 17, 2015 Aug. 6, 2015 Sept. 8, 2012 Check Image Fungicide was applied to west half of milo field in late July. Determined differences were from

Page 4: Data Source Data Points/Acre...July 17, 2015 Aug. 6, 2015 Sept. 8, 2012 Check Image Fungicide was applied to west half of milo field in late July. Determined differences were from
Page 5: Data Source Data Points/Acre...July 17, 2015 Aug. 6, 2015 Sept. 8, 2012 Check Image Fungicide was applied to west half of milo field in late July. Determined differences were from
Page 6: Data Source Data Points/Acre...July 17, 2015 Aug. 6, 2015 Sept. 8, 2012 Check Image Fungicide was applied to west half of milo field in late July. Determined differences were from

2013 In-Season Image

of Soybeans

Applying Soygreen

2016 VR Rec

3 lbs/ac

soygreennone

2013

2016

Page 7: Data Source Data Points/Acre...July 17, 2015 Aug. 6, 2015 Sept. 8, 2012 Check Image Fungicide was applied to west half of milo field in late July. Determined differences were from

Applying Soygreen

2013 2016

Avg Bu/ac Diff App vs No App

Soybeans $/acre

5 $9

$/acre Difference $45

$/ac to apply $18

Net Gain/acre $27

Page 8: Data Source Data Points/Acre...July 17, 2015 Aug. 6, 2015 Sept. 8, 2012 Check Image Fungicide was applied to west half of milo field in late July. Determined differences were from

3 lbs/ac

soygreen

none

Page 9: Data Source Data Points/Acre...July 17, 2015 Aug. 6, 2015 Sept. 8, 2012 Check Image Fungicide was applied to west half of milo field in late July. Determined differences were from
Page 10: Data Source Data Points/Acre...July 17, 2015 Aug. 6, 2015 Sept. 8, 2012 Check Image Fungicide was applied to west half of milo field in late July. Determined differences were from
Page 11: Data Source Data Points/Acre...July 17, 2015 Aug. 6, 2015 Sept. 8, 2012 Check Image Fungicide was applied to west half of milo field in late July. Determined differences were from

GS: V9 – V11Height: ~3.75 ft

GS: V7 – V9Height: ~18 - 30 in

GS: V6 – V7Height: ~14 in

June 2nd, 2017 June 15th, 2017 June 22nd, 2017

More vigorLess vigor

Page 12: Data Source Data Points/Acre...July 17, 2015 Aug. 6, 2015 Sept. 8, 2012 Check Image Fungicide was applied to west half of milo field in late July. Determined differences were from

Page 13: Data Source Data Points/Acre...July 17, 2015 Aug. 6, 2015 Sept. 8, 2012 Check Image Fungicide was applied to west half of milo field in late July. Determined differences were from
Page 14: Data Source Data Points/Acre...July 17, 2015 Aug. 6, 2015 Sept. 8, 2012 Check Image Fungicide was applied to west half of milo field in late July. Determined differences were from
Page 15: Data Source Data Points/Acre...July 17, 2015 Aug. 6, 2015 Sept. 8, 2012 Check Image Fungicide was applied to west half of milo field in late July. Determined differences were from
Page 16: Data Source Data Points/Acre...July 17, 2015 Aug. 6, 2015 Sept. 8, 2012 Check Image Fungicide was applied to west half of milo field in late July. Determined differences were from
Page 17: Data Source Data Points/Acre...July 17, 2015 Aug. 6, 2015 Sept. 8, 2012 Check Image Fungicide was applied to west half of milo field in late July. Determined differences were from

Page 18: Data Source Data Points/Acre...July 17, 2015 Aug. 6, 2015 Sept. 8, 2012 Check Image Fungicide was applied to west half of milo field in late July. Determined differences were from
Page 19: Data Source Data Points/Acre...July 17, 2015 Aug. 6, 2015 Sept. 8, 2012 Check Image Fungicide was applied to west half of milo field in late July. Determined differences were from
Page 20: Data Source Data Points/Acre...July 17, 2015 Aug. 6, 2015 Sept. 8, 2012 Check Image Fungicide was applied to west half of milo field in late July. Determined differences were from

Page 21: Data Source Data Points/Acre...July 17, 2015 Aug. 6, 2015 Sept. 8, 2012 Check Image Fungicide was applied to west half of milo field in late July. Determined differences were from

Wheat

NDVI Image

Top Dressing Wheat

VR Rec•

Page 22: Data Source Data Points/Acre...July 17, 2015 Aug. 6, 2015 Sept. 8, 2012 Check Image Fungicide was applied to west half of milo field in late July. Determined differences were from

Hybrid B out

performed

Hybrid A

A

BB

A

BB

X

Y

Hybrid X stood up

to high winds

where Hybrid Y

green snapped

July 17, 2015 Aug. 6, 2015 Sept. 8, 2012

Check Image

Fungicide was applied to west half of milo

field in late July. Determined differences

were from previous farming practices.

Before After

Page 23: Data Source Data Points/Acre...July 17, 2015 Aug. 6, 2015 Sept. 8, 2012 Check Image Fungicide was applied to west half of milo field in late July. Determined differences were from

Just a Piece of the Puzzle!1. Identify Variability2. Take Soil Samples3. Analyze Results4. Create a VR Rec

5. Apply VR Rec

Page 24: Data Source Data Points/Acre...July 17, 2015 Aug. 6, 2015 Sept. 8, 2012 Check Image Fungicide was applied to west half of milo field in late July. Determined differences were from

Just a Piece of the Puzzle!

1. Identify Variability2. Collect Soil Texture (EC/EM) Data

3. Analyze Results

4. Pull Zone Samples5. Create VR Rec&

6. Apply VR Rec

Page 25: Data Source Data Points/Acre...July 17, 2015 Aug. 6, 2015 Sept. 8, 2012 Check Image Fungicide was applied to west half of milo field in late July. Determined differences were from

1.

2.

3.