day #5, june 21 st cep 955 summer hybrid 2013 jack smith michigan state university
DESCRIPTION
RQ LabTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Day #5, June 21 st CEP 955 Summer Hybrid 2013 Jack Smith Michigan State University](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062504/5a4d1b5e7f8b9ab0599ac019/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Day #5, June 21st CEP 955 Summer Hybrid 2013
Jack Smith
Michigan State University
![Page 2: Day #5, June 21 st CEP 955 Summer Hybrid 2013 Jack Smith Michigan State University](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062504/5a4d1b5e7f8b9ab0599ac019/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
OverviewWeek 1 focus: Elements of the front-endSpecific focus today: Structuring the literature
review sectionPivot next week to the study designBut… instructional sequence is semi-linear, but
thinking and development process is cyclicalToday will focus time on lit reviews and allot
time other front end issuesDoes someone want critical attention to their RQs?Second theory bit to go with Amy’s?Book review of GCR: major theoretical perspectives
![Page 3: Day #5, June 21 st CEP 955 Summer Hybrid 2013 Jack Smith Michigan State University](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062504/5a4d1b5e7f8b9ab0599ac019/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
RQ Lab
![Page 4: Day #5, June 21 st CEP 955 Summer Hybrid 2013 Jack Smith Michigan State University](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062504/5a4d1b5e7f8b9ab0599ac019/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Homework check-inWhat was useful, if anything, in GGB, chapter
4?Was anyone surprised/upset by the negative
assessment of overall quality of published research in education?
How many tried outlining their literature review section?
Decisions about framing theory in your literature review section?
![Page 5: Day #5, June 21 st CEP 955 Summer Hybrid 2013 Jack Smith Michigan State University](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062504/5a4d1b5e7f8b9ab0599ac019/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
The work of reviewThe cycle of engagement with sources
Search and find/select (electronic & “dumb” and eyes-on and “smart”)
Read (use of the scarce resource of time)Evaluate and characterizeLook for patterns across sources (results,
methods, framing theory, limitations)Structure your synthesis (communicating the
patterns you see)Note: The work of review is never complete
(despite our proposal writing needs and wishes)
![Page 6: Day #5, June 21 st CEP 955 Summer Hybrid 2013 Jack Smith Michigan State University](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062504/5a4d1b5e7f8b9ab0599ac019/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Refining our source typologyFrom your CEP 901B papers and top-ten
work: Empirical vs. theoreticalEmpirical is pretty easy to recognize
(common structure)Theoretical focuses on the statement and
justification of general principlesBut E & T are insufficient as types of scholarly
writingOther types?Review your top-ten
![Page 7: Day #5, June 21 st CEP 955 Summer Hybrid 2013 Jack Smith Michigan State University](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062504/5a4d1b5e7f8b9ab0599ac019/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Writing interludeWould 20 minutes of literature review think,
outline, and compose time be welcome?
![Page 8: Day #5, June 21 st CEP 955 Summer Hybrid 2013 Jack Smith Michigan State University](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062504/5a4d1b5e7f8b9ab0599ac019/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Theory Bite(s)Introducing Amy’s PracticumAmy: social constructivismQ&A; discussion
![Page 9: Day #5, June 21 st CEP 955 Summer Hybrid 2013 Jack Smith Michigan State University](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062504/5a4d1b5e7f8b9ab0599ac019/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
The Role of Theory (generally)Seeing is a conceptual act => we see with our ideasLooking, observing, recording, interpreting are all
conceptual actions (applications of our ideas to raw observable data)
Frameworks direct our attention to particular features of the world that we could notice, label, and record
No explicit framework does not imply no framework (implicit, intuitive, unconscious frames)
Researcher’s responsibility and reflective practice: Try to be explicit about what guides your seeing
![Page 10: Day #5, June 21 st CEP 955 Summer Hybrid 2013 Jack Smith Michigan State University](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062504/5a4d1b5e7f8b9ab0599ac019/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Theory Scale (or “reach”)In educational psychology (at least)—as in other fields—
theories differ in the range of phenomena they address“Grand” theory: All of human learning and/or
development, e.g., Skinner’s operant conditioning theoryOutside of education: plate tectonics in geology
Many other theories narrow the range of their target phenomena; “medium” to “small-scale”??
Examples:TPACK: phenomenon = what teachers know about
educational technologyWentzel: phenomenon = how social support, motivation,
and achievement relateBut scale is also dynamic; small-scale theories can be
adapted to account for a wider range of phenomena (e.g., “perceived loss”)
![Page 11: Day #5, June 21 st CEP 955 Summer Hybrid 2013 Jack Smith Michigan State University](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062504/5a4d1b5e7f8b9ab0599ac019/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Grand Theory (of thinking, knowing & learning) Greeno, Collins, & Resnick (1996) provide a very useful
top-level categorization of their families of theoriesThree broad perspectives (groupsof theories)
Behavioral theoriesCognitive theoriesSituative theories
Situative (sometimes called “sociocultural”) theories focus on participating (as knowing) and on individual and collective knowingRogoff, cognitive apprenticeshipBrown, Collins, & Duguid (1989) “situated cognition” Jean LaveEtienne Wenger
Perspectives form a temporal progression of the field (B->C->S)
![Page 12: Day #5, June 21 st CEP 955 Summer Hybrid 2013 Jack Smith Michigan State University](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062504/5a4d1b5e7f8b9ab0599ac019/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Homework for MondayFocus: How do the framing part of my proposal
(front end + RQs) shape my study designTexts: Review SRIE, chapter 5; Creswell, chapter 1
(worldviews & major research traditions)Writing: Update the entries in the Google doc
(front end, RQs, study designIf you need to, open a second row for yourself
Other ways to move aheadRefine/improve your problem statement/introductionShow your ps/intro to a peer or JackWork on your literature review as the next section
(outlining or composing)Work on your RQs and “defining” your key terms