defining rri, consulting stakeholders: setting the basis for an rri toolkit
TRANSCRIPT
Defining RRI, consulting stakeholders: setting the basis for an RRI Toolkit
“la Caixa” Foundation
|
1.- Share knowledge gained in 1st analysis phase
2.- Open up the number of quality contributions
3.- Train the Hubs for the M9-M10 Workshops:- To contribute to the definition of RRI - To gather promising practices - To analyse stakeholders needs and constraints- To create a Community of Practice
AIMS OF THE WORKSHOP
|
|
1.- Responsible Research and innovation
2.- RRI Tools: state of the project
3.- RRI Definition and good practices
4.- Stakeholders needs, constraints and motivations
5.- Next steps: M9 –M10 workshops Dissemination
Toolkit.
6.- Consortium meeting program
AIMS OF THE WORKSHOP
|
BENEFITS OF SCIENCE FOR HUMANITY
RISK MANAGEMENT
ETHICAL ACCEPTABILITY
Ethical and Regulatory Challenges to Science and Research Policy at the Global Level. European Commission Report. © European Union, 2012
RESPONSIBLE RESEARCH AND INNOVATION
| Benefits for humanity
|
Responsible Innovation, First Edition, Ed. by Richard Owen, John Bessan and Maggy Heintz. 2013 John Wiley & Sons
Ethical acceptability: smart meters in the Netherlands
|Risk Management
|
RRI Tools: state of the project
|RRI TOOLS
D1.1 Policy brief on RRI and working definitionD1.2 Guidelines on the methodologies for the collection, classification and evaluation method for RRI Good PracticesD1.3 Report on the quality criteria of Good Practice Standards in RRI (to be used in WP2 and WP3) - shiftedD6.1 RRI Toolkit Dissemination Plan
Barcelona Workshop Background note and ReportD5.1 Report on Coverage of RRI aspects in STI
(Science, Technology, Innovation) evaluations. D2.1 Guidelines for the implementation of the
Stakeholders consultation in relation to RRI
|
D1.1 Policy brief on the state of the art on RRI and a working definition of RRI (Month 8)
D1.4 A catalogue of Good Practice Standards in RRI (Month12)
(WP1)
(WP2)
RRI Tools - Following Deliverables
D 2.2 Report on the analysis of needs and constraints of the stakeholder groups in RRI practices in Europe (M12)
D3.1 Multimedia 2.0 collaborative platform (M12)(WP3)
D6.2 Project information sheet(WP6)
|
RRI Definition and good practices
|Responsible Research and Innovation
Governance
Ethics
Open Access
EducationPublic engagement
Gender Equality
Process requirements
Outcomes
Policy Agendas Stakeholders
... dynamic, iterative process by which stakeholders involved in the
R&I practice become mutually responsive to each other and
share responsibiity regarding the outcomes and process
requirements
(D1.2)
Diversity & Inclusion
Openness & Transparency
Responsiveness & Adaptive change
Anticipation & Reflexivity
|RRI promising Practices
Embedding social responsibility in the design of offshore wind energy systems
A Siemens- Univ. Delft project funded by the National Research Council of the Netherlands specific program for Responsible Innovation
- Value sensitive design
- Institutional design
- Stakeholder analysis
- Participatory integrated assesment
- Social acceptance/ social acceptability
|
Value sensitive design
RRI promising Practices
4 P’s: Product, process, purpose, people.
(Sthal)
|
Formulating research agendas between RESEARCHERS AND CSO’s. Generates dialogues on science (including social science, engineering...) Debates move upstream into agenda setting
Promising practices
- “Upstream” debate, (beyond mindstream modulation)
- Agenda setting
- Community based research
Public engagement with research and research engagement with society
|RRI Promising Practices
Structural change through transformational gender action plans
Implentation of sustaibable institutional transformation, creating environments in which women and men can perform equally.
Organizational structure
Engagement of decision makers
|
Socio-Technical integration Research
Set of 20 laboratory engagement studies to assess and compare the varying pressures on – and capacities for – laboratories to integrate broader societal considerations into their work
RRI Promising Practices
http://youtu.be/feOOT2iI16o
- Embedded social scientist and humanities scholars
- Midstream modulation
|Responsible Research and Innovation
|
Stakeholders needs, constraints and motivations
| Stakeholders
• Stakeholders needs, constraints and motivations.
• Worskshops: Stakeholder consultation: recruitment criteria, moderation, reporting...
+ Engagement of CSO’s in science through agenda setting
Getting free open access to research results
Acknowledgement of CSO knowledge and expertise
Unfamiliarity/lack of understanding of the issue
Democratic deficit
Sufficiency of compliance of legal requirements
Unfamiliarity with RRI
Freedom of research and concerns about bureaucracy
Pressure to publish and job security
|
Next steps: the workshops, the Toolkit
|
•2 Workshops (definition and promising practices / stakeholders) in 1 day
•In October – November
•A Manual will exist with details
•Suport from coordination, Hubs coordination and WP1 and WP2 will b given
Next steps: M9-M10 Hubs workshops
|
M6 M9-M10
Next steps: Disseminations
|
Self-assessment tools Dissemination tools Good practices and good practices standards
RRI Tools Search engine Library Specific policy agenda’s resources
Next steps: The tools
Training and advocacy Resources...
Community of Practice
Governance
Ethics
Open Access
EducationPublic
engagement
Gender Equality
Diversity & Inclusion
Openness & Transparency
Responsiveness & Adaptive change
Anticipation & Reflexivity
|
Day 1: RRI Definition and good practices Day 2: Stakeholders needs, constraints and motivations
Workshop program
Defining RRI, consulting stakeholders: setting the basis for an RRI Toolkit
“la Caixa” Foundation