designed the 80/20 fully integrated tax system for south african revenue services 2005/6
TRANSCRIPT
Vision & Mission StatementVision
to be a leading and dynamic Public Revenue Service
Missionto Provide an effective, efficient, economical and sustainable Revenue Service to ensure we meet the Economical & Social needs and demands of our Country and People.
National Dept. of Finance Directorate: Revenue Service (SARS)
Scope of this Project
To assist SARS: Increasing the number of eligible tax-payers, To ensure the accuracy & validity of updated tax-payers information
on SARS’ Database, through the implementation of a fully-integrated tax system,
To design, structure and implement strategies which will detect, address and deter non-compliancy of Tax Laws and regulations,
In addition to the above: Colors can also assist SARS with other Cost Saving initiatives which can dramatically influence the Minister’s Budget for other Ministries such as: Provincial & Local Government, Safety & Security, Transport, etc where we have extended knowledge (e.g. Standardizing of systems/application, Job Creation, etc.
Purpose
Fully integrated and automated Tax structure National system (with multi-disciplines as drivers) e.g. SARS,
Registrar of Companies, Dept of Home Affairs, Dept of Labour, Dept of Trade & Industry, Statistics South Africa, Deeds Office, Dept’s of Justice, Safety & Security & Correctional Services, Dept of Transport, Dept of Intelligence,
As much as all Efforts or Input results in an Output, the Output will form the base for the next batch of Input. In modern times where much dependency and reliance has been placed on Technology, without accurate, available and accessible Memory or Data, any or all technology is rendered worthless.
The ISO standards and Cobit practice tools implies that “Efforts and its Results (available data or statistics) is the key to any entity’s success or failure”. All our proposals and working solutions include these business Enablers.
Areas of Focus
Individuals, Micro-businesses, Small & medium enterprises (SME’s), Large Businesses & Charities, Non-Governmental Organizations (NGO’s: incl. Religious
sectors), Non-Profitable Organizations (NPO’s : incl. Religious sectors)
The 20/80 factor vs the 80/20 factor
It is the norm for most Developed Nations where the expectation of Tax Law compliance and knowledge is rated above average, Much reliance is placed on the Tax-payers (Individual, Business, NGO’, NPO’s and Government departments) to comply with (a) Registration for Tax-purpose, (b) Tax Lodgment obligations & (c) Submitting correct Tax information, timely:
Unfortunately these EXPECTATION has often resulted in huge tax losses due to inaccurate and/or outdated information, tax evasion and tax fraud. Governments and/or National Treasury Departments were forced to invested millions of US$ and Euro’s in Tax Fraud Audits and Risk Policies and instead of managing by EXCEPTION, Managers/Directorates had to constantly try and manage all their processes, at the time: exposing the organization to more and greater Risk.
80/20 Approach We believe that with our Approach, SARS Revenue shall be able to improve
its Information Gathering process substantially. In essence the current approach and system provide SARS with less than
20% of business and Personal Tax validated information. However with the implementation of the 80/20 approach, SARS will have obtained no less than 80% of critical business and personal tax information (certified and validated) prior to the issuance of the “Annual Tax Forms” (business and person).
This Approach will allow Managers to “Manage by EXCEPTION”, by constantly evaluating and improving the 20%, where necessary.
Common issues facing Micro-business & SME’s, re:Tax Compliancy Registration of Taxes: all though most of these businesses are
registered for Tax, they are not often full participants of the Tax system
Poor Record Keeping: often has significant impact on compliancy, thus often fail or default on accurate and timely:-
Lodgment of Statistical reports (monthly, quarterly & annually) & Paying Taxes such as PAYE/SITE, UIF, SDL, VAT, etc. Micro business & SME’s often fail to provide for their tax liabilities
due to a lack of cash-flow and inadequate business planning, thus fall in debt with arrear taxes + fines & penalties, due to non-compliance with Tax Laws and regulations. Some finally end up in Court, while others opt for closure, bankruptcy and insolvency.
Although a great % of Micro businesses and SME’s strive towards fully complying with the Tax Laws, a % of habitual non-compliers is constantly busy exploiting new loop-hole to avoid paying Tax
Prevention is less costlier than Cure”
o Preventative and Corrective Action/measures
o Standard Practice or industry Norms allows us to apply relative or reasonable Preventative measures to protect us from losing control of our business or interest, however as indicated in our ICA model, certain Internal & External factors can/will and shall result in compromising or request for Change Management of our Current/present Risk Management Tool/system or model….hence Change is inevitable
o But these Changes can only take place when applying the necessary Corrective measures which will and/or should determine your new updated Preventative tool, as included into your RMS to ensure business has taken the necessary precautions against any previously recorded exposure/risk.
o See table for illustration
Norm/Standard AS ISCurrent -Practice
TO BE (for Change Request)Best – Practice
ICA (Integrated Control Architecture)
Economical forcesTechnological forces
Political forcesSocial forces
VisionMissionValues
8 Maintain Assets
2Procurement
9R&D
projects 3Marketing
5Sell service
6Workforce
7Maintain systems
10Finance
1Plan/Strategy
4Product/Services
CentralizedResponsibility
Suppliers
Consultingservices
InvestmentsLenders
The Public
Network
Objectives
Goals
Cash outCash in
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
ICA (Integrated Control Architecture)
Business Processes
BPMe
IPMe
5P’s & 3E’s
5P’s & 3E’s
7A’s & 3G’s
Business Performance
Measure
Individual Performance Measure
System Performance
MeasureSPMe
Key Tools for the Assessment of Business, IT & Risk Management
• 3 E’s : Output measurements
• 5M’s: Input
• 5Ps’: Process levels of an Activity
• 7GA’s : Generic Assertions
• 3G’s
• Effectiveness, Efficiency and Economy
• Material, Machinery, Manpower, Method and Measure
• Plan, Prepare, Produce, Pre-delivery and Present
• Validity (Vy), Complete (C), Accuracy (A), Timely (T), Valuation (Vn), Existence (E) and Record (R),
• Guide/path, Guard/protect, Gauge/evaluate
SWOT Finding StatementSWOT Finding Statement
IDENTIFY: What we have & What don’t we have? How do we manage what we have or don’t have ?
1. Method YES NO Adequate Inadequate
2. Material YES NO Adequate Inadequate
3. Manpower YES NO Adequate Inadequate
4. Machinery YES NO Adequate Inadequate
5. Measures YES NO Adequate Inadequate
POLICY &
GOVERNANCE
TO ENSURE COMPLIANCY
WITH NATIONAL
GOVERNMENT & TREASURY
LEGISLATIVE, CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE, PFMA, COBIT, CAATS, AND
OTHER RELEVANT
GUIDELINES.
PROCESSES&
PROCEDURES
ENSURE THAT THE SARS PROCESSES, PROCEDURES, WORK AND DOCUMENT FLOW IS DESIGNED & IMPLEMENT TO ENSURE EFFECTIVE CONTROLS & COMPLIANCE.
CAPACITY BUILDING
ENSURE THAT SARS HAS THE CORRECT MANPOWER, MATERIAL, MACHINERY & METHODS TO PROVIDE AN EFFECTIVE, EFFICIENT & ECONOMICAL SERVICE TO IT’S CUSTOMERS.
INTERNAL SERVICE
LEVEL AGREEMENTS
(SLA’s)
ENSURE THAT ALL RELEVANT PERSONNEL & DEPARTMENTS PROVIDE THE NECESSARY SUPPORT & INFORMATION AT THE RIGHT PLACE, TIME AND FOR THE RIGHT ACTIVITY OR PROJECT.
SERVICE DELIVERY
TO ENSURE EFFECTIVE,
EFFICIENT AND AN
ECONOMICAL INTEGRATED & USER-FRIENDLY
TAX SYSTEM WHICH MEETS THE NEEDS &
REQUIREMENTS FOR EXCELLENT
SERVICE DELIVERY.
PERFORMANCEMANAGEMENT
TO ENSURE THAT MANAGEMENT & STAFF SERVICE DELIVERY IS EFFECTIVELY MEASURED AGAINST THEIR JOB DESCRIPTION, PERFORMANCE CONTRACTS AND SLA’s, FOR COMPETENCIES & WORTH.
OUTPUT/OUTCOMEAN EFFECTIVE FULLY INTEGRATED TAX SYSTEM, TO REDUCE EXCESSIVE LABOUR COST, IMPROVE PRODUCTIVITY AND COLLECTIONS & REAL-TIME INFORMATION
APPROVED BUDGET &STRATEGY
SARSMinister
OfFinance
Finance
NationalGovernmen
t