development of novel als treatment on the basis …...author affiliations development of novel als...

1
Author affiliations Development of Novel ALS Treatment on the Basis of Mechanisms of Cellular Chronological Life Span Control Michael Youdell 1 , Elizabeth Milway 1 , Jane Mellor 1, 3 , Huw Jones 1 , Phil Jordan 2 , Ewan Hunter 2 , Aroul Ramadass 2 , Merit Cudkowicz 4 , Alexandre Akoulitchev 1,2 Background: Chronological life span (CLS) control is a highly conserved cellular mechanism responsible for network coordination of repair mechanisms capable of improved viability and amelioration of cellular pathologies in ageing cells. By deploying Chronoscreen TM , a phenotypic screen for extension of chronological life span control, together with RNAi we have identified a biologically active compound RDC5, with a mode of action dependent on autophagy, protein turnover, protein synthesis. Treatment with RDC5 showed amelioration of toxic effects of SOD1 mutants in C.elegans and in a neuroblastoma cell line. Further analysis of RDC5 revealed high efficacy in the turnover of several neurotoxic aggregating proteins. We are currently testing RDC5 treatment regimes in SOD1 and TDP43 models of ALS in mice. Epigenetic and metabolic links to CLS offer unique advantages for development of diagnostic, prognostic and predictive blood based ALS biomarkers, based on chromosome conformation signatures. On the basis of the previous successful biomarker development for AD patients by Oxford BioDynamics Ltd, we are conducting a screen and cross validation for chromosome conformation signatures biomarker panels associated with ALS, as well as their suitability for disease monitoring under RDC5 treatment. Adapted from Fraser et al. Genome Biology 2009 Chronos Therapeutics Limited (UK) 1 , Oxford BioDynamics Limited (UK) 2 , Biochemistry Department, University of Oxford, UK 3 , Massachusetts General Hospital, ALS Clinic 4 3C: Chromatin undergoes several layers of compaction, but some of the conformations formed by the DNA also have regulatory functions. Cis and trans chromosomal contacts may help to regulate gene expression and epigenetic control. Physical DNA contacts can be identified using the chromatin confirmation capture (3C) technique, shown above for a cis interaction. EpiSwitch Assay: EpiSwitch technology is based on the chromosome conformation capture technique developed by Dekker et al. (2002). It is a non-invasive Industry Standard technology suitable for detecting specific chromosome conformation signatures in different disease states. 3C analysis was performed in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions for EpiSwitch 3C technology (Oxford BioDynamics Ltd). Briefly, cells were cross-linked in 32% paraformaldehyde, quenched, resuspended in hypotonic buffer and subjected to restriction digest (FastDigest, Fermentas) kit for 20 min, followed by ligation for 10 min at 16C. Following proteinase K treatment, 13 μl of the mix was analysed by nested PCR (25 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 56°C for 45 sec, 72°C for 30 sec). PCR products were analyzed on a Caliper GX90 electrophoresis system (Perkin Elmer) in accordance with the manufacturers’ instructions. Abstract Number: 6 Stage I Yeast Oxanol Screen Stage II Yeast Bioscreen Stage III C. elegans Screening Chronoscreen TM Automated Screen for Measurement of CLS High throughput pla6orm. Measures outgrowth of yeast cultures treated with compound. Used to confirm hits from the Oxanol Screen. QuanBtaBve data on extension of Healthspan, Median Lifespan & Maximum Lifespan Automated Screen for Measurement of CLS bus-5 or bus-8 mutant (drug sensitive) background. Timed egg laying generates synchronous population. Worms assessed on a daily basis for viability by microscopy. Assays: Healthspan, Median Lifespan & Maximum Lifespan Conducted under GLP conditions. High Throughput Screen for Viability High throughput system. Fluorescent assay to measure viability of a yeast cell. Assesses effect of a compound on the viability of postKmitoBc yeast Conducted under GLP condiBons. CHRONOSCREEN TM Phenotypic ReadKOut of Chronological Life Span (CLS) Extension ModulaBon of The Cellular Processes of Ageing & Disease 0 10 20 30 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Days Popula4on Viability (%) Control Compound A Time of Last Mito4c Cell Division Time of Last Mito4c Cell Division Healthspan Extension Maximum Lifespan Extension Median Lifespan Extension Healthspan Time at which populaBon reaches 95% Viability Median Lifespan Time at which populaBon reaches 50% Viability Maximum Lifespan Time at which populaBon reaches 5% Viability Chronological Lifespan is the length of Ame an individual or populaAon survives aCer the last mitoAc cell division. 0 5 10 15 20 25 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Days Popula?on Viability (%) SOD1 (127X), Control SOD1 (127X), RDC5 SOD1 (WT), Control Chroneuro is able to significantly improve the Median Lifespan of worms expressing a mutant form of SOD1 known to cause ALS. 24% Median Lifespan Extension SOD1 (G39A) Survival Data in NSC34 Neuroblastoma Cells Trypan Blue Staining (%) Wild Type Wild Type SOD1 G93A SOD1 G93A 0 10 20 30 40 50 Chroneuro reduces the toxicity of ALS SOD1 mutants (G93A) expressed in neuroblastoma cell line NSC34 Ageing is a Highly Regulated Biological Process AGEING CHRONOSCREEN TM & BEYOND Work Flow 1° Screen Yeast 3° Screen Worm HTP MOA Screen Disease Models 2° Screen Yeast Dose Response ChronoscreenTM M.O.A Screen GeneBc Analysis Worm RNAi Target ID Transcriptomics Disease Models Parkinson’s Disease HunBngton’s Disease Obesity ALS Alzheimer’s Disease Neuronal ProtecBon Lysosomal Disorders Mitochondrial Disorders Muscular Dystrophy Fibrosis Diabetes YEAST RESULTS WORM RESULTS Compound Healthspan Median Lifespan Healthspan Median Lifespan Standards Resveratrol +5% +20% +16% +6% Caffeine +5% +10% +14% +6% Chronos Compounds RDC5 +50% +80% +80% +33% CHR1 +25% +70% +25% +27% Defined pathways influence the development of ageZrelated phenotypes and are highly conserved among species, from yeast to humans. Resegng ageing controls in yeast and worms High efficacy in mouse disease models TherapeuBc value in humans 10 proprietary leads, 67 repositioned leads Focused Library of 30,000 Small Molecules Library of 1200 FDA/EU approved drugs SOD1 Survival Data ALS Diagnosis 2-8/100,000 Population Riluzole: Glutamate antagonist 9% chance of 1 year improved survival** Average gain 2-3 months. No symptom improvement Tracheotomy Artificial Ventilation, Death FVC reduction Supportive care, Nasogastric feeding, Supportive care drugs: Tizanidine, Baclofen Botulinum toxin Anticholinergics Antidepressants Phase 2 Goal: Lead compound delays reduction in FVC (breathing difficulties), +ve effect on ALSFRS-R. Phase 3 Goal: Lead compound delays reduction in FVC (breathing difficulties) . Reduces ventilation need and extends ventilator free and absolute lifespan, together with ALS Disease Activity Index improvement via ALSFRS-R. Problem/SoluBon in ALS Average time to death: 39 Months, 10 Year Survival <10% Chronological Controls ReplicaBve Controls p values generated from tKtest, 6 week treatment regime A53T Survival Data Trial ongoing – further data accumulaBon from 52 weeks onwards expected 0 5 10 15 20 25 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Days PopulaCon Viability (%) WT + Control Q35 + Control Q35 + RDC5 17% Median Lifespan Extension PolyQ Survival Data ReducBon of AggregaBon in Murine Striatum ALS TRIALS InZvivo Brain Stem Analysis MRI: NeurodegeneraBon MRS: Metabolic changes OpBon for early cull group to observe disease progression 3 doses, oral gavage, 6days/week, main cohorts n=20, early cull groups n=5 ALS SOD1 Mice (TgNZSOD1Z G93AZ1Gur) 60 days 175 days Chroneuro or Vehicle Dosing Survival, Body Weight, Disease Onset & Stage Scoring 120 days Early Cull Cohort G93A SOD1 OverKExpression Rotarod, Grip Strength & Open Field Tests 90 days ExZvivo Analysis Histology: Motor neuron counts RNA processing efficiency Background: C57BL/6. 3 dose groups, aged and young cohorts, oral gavage, 6days/week WT Mice (Aged 3m & 18m) Month 0 Month 6 Chroneuro or Vehicle Dosing Survival, Body Weight, Disease Onset & Stage Scoring Young & Aged Mice Biochemical Readouts TDPK43 localizaBon UbiquiBn localizaBon RNA processing efficiency RNA ediBng Histology TDPK43 localizaBon UbiquiBn deposits Motor neuron counts Other Ex-vivo Analysis RNA processing efficiency InZvivo Brain Stem Analysis MRI: NeurodegeneraBon MRS: Metabolic changes 3 doses, oral gavage, 6days/week, cohorts n=20, 4 week duraBon Week 0 Week 4 Chroneuro or Vehicle Dosing Survival, Body Weight, Onset & Stage Scoring TDPK43 Model Rotarod, Grip Strength & Open Field Tests ALS TDPZ43 Mice (virally transfected) Control Chroneuro TDP-43 3/27 ALS Non-ALS Tissue sample Band present at correct size? (±10%) 151 ALS YES (231 bp) 152 ALS YES (232 bp) 153 Non-ALS NO 154 Non-ALS NO Primer ALS NonZALS 151 152 153 154 TARDBP1 5/9 1 0 1 1 TARDBP1 5/13 1 1 0 0 TARDBP1 5/17 1 1 1 1 TARDBP1 5/21 1 1 1 0 TARDBP1 5/25 1 0 1 1 TARDBP1 9/13 1 1 0 1 TARDBP1 9/17 1 1 1 1 TARDBP1 9/21 1 0 1 1 TARDBP1 9/25 1 0 0 1 TARDBP1 13/21 0 0 0 0 TARDBP1 13/25 1 0 0 1 TARDBP1 17/21 1 1 1 1 TARDBP1 17/25 1 1 1 1 TARDBP1 21/25 1 1 1 1 Primer ALS NonZALS 151 152 153 154 TARDBP1 3/11 1 1 1 1 TARDBP1 3/15 1 0 1 0 TARDBP1 3/19 0 0 0 0 TARDBP1 3/23 1 1 0 1 TARDBP1 3/27 1 1 0 0 TARDBP1 11/15 1 0 1 0 TARDBP1 11/19 0 0 1 1 TARDBP1 11/23 1 1 1 1 TARDBP1 11/27 1 1 1 1 TARDBP1 15/23 1 1 1 1 TARDBP1 15/27 1 1 1 1 TARDBP1 19/23 1 1 1 0 TARDBP1 19/27 0 0 1 1 TARDBP1 23/27 1 1 1 1 TDP-43 19/27 ALS Non-ALS Tissue sample Band present at correct size? (±10%) 151 ALS NO 152 ALS NO 153 Non-ALS YES (366 bp) 154 Non-ALS YES (365 bp) 11022000 11105000 3 5 9 11 13 15 19 21 23 25 27 17 ALS Non-ALS 11022000 11105000 3 5 9 11 13 15 19 21 23 25 27 17 Key Present in 2 of 2 ALS samples and not in any non-ALS samples Present in 2 of 2 non-ALS samples and not in any ALS samples

Upload: others

Post on 28-Jun-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Development of Novel ALS Treatment on the Basis …...Author affiliations Development of Novel ALS Treatment on the Basis of Mechanisms of Cellular Chronological Life Span Control

Author affiliations

Development of Novel ALS Treatment on the Basis of Mechanisms of Cellular Chronological Life Span Control Michael Youdell1, Elizabeth Milway1, Jane Mellor1, 3, Huw Jones1, Phil Jordan2, Ewan Hunter2, Aroul Ramadass2, Merit Cudkowicz4, Alexandre Akoulitchev1,2 Background: Chronological life span (CLS) control is a highly conserved cellular mechanism responsible for network coordination of repair mechanisms capable of improved viability and amelioration of cellular pathologies in ageing cells. By deploying ChronoscreenTM, a phenotypic screen for extension of chronological life span control, together with RNAi we have identified a biologically active compound RDC5, with a mode of action dependent on autophagy, protein turnover, protein synthesis. Treatment with RDC5 showed amelioration of toxic effects of SOD1 mutants in C.elegans and in a neuroblastoma cell line. Further analysis of RDC5 revealed high efficacy in the turnover of several neurotoxic aggregating proteins. We are currently testing RDC5 treatment regimes in SOD1 and TDP43 models of ALS in mice. Epigenetic and metabolic links to CLS offer unique advantages for development of diagnostic, prognostic and predictive blood based ALS biomarkers, based on chromosome conformation signatures. On the basis of the previous successful biomarker development for AD patients by Oxford BioDynamics Ltd, we are conducting a screen and cross validation for chromosome conformation signatures biomarker panels associated with ALS, as well as their suitability for disease monitoring under RDC5 treatment.

Adapted from Fraser et al. Genome Biology 2009

Chronos Therapeutics Limited (UK)1, Oxford BioDynamics Limited (UK)2, Biochemistry Department, University of Oxford, UK3, Massachusetts General Hospital, ALS Clinic4

3C: Chromatin undergoes several layers of

compaction, but some of the conformations formed by the DNA also have regulatory functions. Cis and trans chromosomal contacts may help to regulate gene expression and epigenetic control. Physical DNA contacts can be identified using the chromatin confirmation capture (3C) technique, shown above for a cis interaction.

EpiSwitch Assay: EpiSwitch technology is based on the

chromosome conformation capture technique developed by Dekker et al. (2002). It is a non-invasive Industry Standard technology suitable for detecting specific chromosome conformation signatures in different disease states. 3C analysis was performed in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions for EpiSwitch 3C technology (Oxford BioDynamics Ltd). Briefly, cells were cross-linked in 32% paraformaldehyde, quenched, resuspended in hypotonic buffer and subjected to restriction digest (FastDigest, Fermentas) kit for 20 min, followed by ligation for 10 min at 16C. Following proteinase K treatment, 13 µl of the mix was analysed by nested PCR (25 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 56°C for 45 sec, 72°C for 30 sec). PCR products were analyzed on a Caliper GX90 electrophoresis system (Perkin Elmer) in accordance with the manufacturers’ instructions.

Abstract Number: 6

Stage&I&Yeast&Oxanol&

Screen&

Stage&II&&Yeast&

Bioscreen&

Stage&III&C.#elegans#Screening&

ChronoscreenTM&

Automated&Screen&for&Measurement&of&CLS&&  High&throughput&pla6orm.&&  Measures&outgrowth&of&yeast&cultures&treated&with&compound.&  Used&to&confirm&hits&from&the&Oxanol&Screen.&&  QuanBtaBve&data&on&extension&of&Healthspan,&Median&Lifespan&&&Maximum&Lifespan&

Automated Screen for Measurement of CLS   bus-5 or bus-8 mutant (drug sensitive) background.   Timed egg laying generates synchronous population.   Worms assessed on a daily basis for viability by

microscopy.   Assays: Healthspan, Median Lifespan & Maximum

Lifespan   Conducted under GLP conditions.

High&Throughput&Screen&for&Viability&  High&throughput&system.&&  Fluorescent&assay&to&measure&viability&of&a&yeast&cell.&  Assesses&effect&of&a&compound&on&the&viability&of&postKmitoBc&yeast&Conducted&under&GLP&condiBons.&

CHRONOSCREENTM&

Phenotypic&ReadKOut&of&Chronological&Life&Span&(CLS)&Extension&

ModulaBon&of&The&Cellular&Processes&of&Ageing&&&Disease&

0 10 20 300

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Days

Popu

la4o

n6Viability66(%) Control

Compound6A

Time6of6Last6Mito4c6Cell6Division

Time6of6Last6Mito4c6Cell6Division

HealthspanExtension

MaximumLifespanExtension

Median6LifespanExtension

 &Healthspan&&Time&at&which&populaBon&reaches&95%&Viability&&

 &Median&Lifespan&&Time&at&which&populaBon&reaches&50%&Viability&

 &Maximum&Lifespan&&Time&at&which&populaBon&reaches&5%&Viability&

Chronological&Lifespan&is&the&length&of&Ame&an&individual&or&populaAon&survives&aCer&the&last&mitoAc&cell&division.&&

SOD1%Worm%Lifespan

0 5 10 15 20 250

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Days

Popu

la?o

n%Viability%%(%)

SOD1%(127X),%ControlSOD1%(127X),%RDC5SOD1%(WT),%Control

Chroneuro&is&able&to&significantly&improve&the&Median&&Lifespan&of&worms&expressing&a&mutant&form&of&SOD1&known&to&cause&ALS.&&

24%&&Median&Lifespan&

Extension&

SOD1&(G39A)&Survival&Data&in&NSC34&Neuroblastoma&Cells&

Amelioration of Toxic SOD1 aggregates by RDC5

Tryp

an B

lue

Stai

ning

(%)

Wild Typ

e

Wild Typ

e

SOD1 G93

A

SOD1 G93

A0

10

20

30

40

50ControlRDC5

Chroneuro&reduces&the&toxicity&of&ALS&SOD1&mutants&(G93A)&expressed&in&neuroblastoma&cell&line&NSC34&

Ageing&is&a&Highly&Regulated&Biological&Process&AGEING&

CHRONOSCREENTM&&&BEYOND&Work&Flow&

1°&Screen&Yeast&&

3°&Screen&Worm&HTP&

MOA&&Screen&&

Disease&Models&

2°&Screen&Yeast&&

Dose&Response&&

ChronoscreenTM&

M.O.A&Screen& GeneBc&Analysis& Worm&RNAi& Target&ID& Transcriptomics&

Disease&Models& Parkinson’s&Disease& HunBngton’s&Disease& Obesity& ALS&& Alzheimer’s&Disease& Neuronal&ProtecBon&& Lysosomal&Disorders& Mitochondrial&Disorders& Muscular&Dystrophy& Fibrosis&& Diabetes&&

YEAST&RESULTS& WORM&RESULTS&

Compound& Healthspan&&Median&Lifespan&

Healthspan&Median&Lifespan&

Standards&

Resveratrol& +5%& +20%& +16%& +6%&

Caffeine& +5%& +10%& +14%& +6%&

Chronos&Compounds&

RDC5& +50%& +80%& +80%& +33%&

CHR1& +25%& +70%& +25%& +27%&

Defined&pathways&influence&the&development&of&ageZrelated&phenotypes&and&are&highly&conserved&among&species,&from&yeast&to&humans.&&

  Resegng&ageing&controls&in&yeast&and&worms&&

  High&efficacy&in&mouse&disease&models&  TherapeuBc&value&in&humans&&

10 proprietary leads, 67 repositioned leads Focused&Library&of&30,000&&

Small&Molecules&

Library&of&1200&&FDA/EU&approved&drugs&

SOD1&&Survival&Data&

ALS Diagnosis 2-8/100,000 Population

Riluzole: Glutamate antagonist

9% chance of 1 year

improved survival**

Average gain 2-3 months.

No symptom improvement

Tracheotomy Artificial

Ventilation, Death

FVC reduction Supportive care,

Nasogastric feeding,

Supportive care drugs:

Tizanidine, Baclofen

Botulinum toxin

Anticholinergics

Antidepressants

Phase 2 Goal: Lead compound delays reduction in FVC (breathing difficulties), +ve effect on

ALSFRS-R.

Phase 3 Goal: Lead compound delays reduction in FVC (breathing difficulties) .

Reduces ventilation need and extends ventilator free and absolute lifespan, together with ALS Disease Activity Index improvement via ALSFRS-R.

Problem/SoluBon&in&ALS&

Average time to death: 39 Months, 10 Year Survival <10%

Chronological&Controls

ReplicaBve&Controls

p&values&generated&from&tKtest,&6&week&treatment&regime&&

A53T&Survival&Data&

Trial&ongoing&–&further&data&accumulaBon&from&52&weeks&onwards&expected&

Effect&of&RDC5&on&PolyQ&Expressing&C".elegans

0 5 10 15 20 250

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Days

Popu

laCo

n&Viability&&(%)

WT&+&ControlQ35&+&ControlQ35&+&RDC5

17%&&Median&Lifespan&

Extension&

PolyQ&&Survival&Data&

ReducBon&of&AggregaBon&in&Murine&Striatum&

ALS&TRIALS&

InZvivo&Brain&Stem&Analysis&  MRI:&NeurodegeneraBon&&  MRS:&Metabolic&changes&

OpBon&for&early&cull&group&to&observe&disease&progression&3&doses,&oral&gavage,&6days/week,&main&cohorts&n=20,&early&cull&

groups&n=5&&&

ALS&SOD1&Mice&&(TgNZSOD1ZG93AZ1Gur)&&

60&days&

175&days&

Chroneuro&or&Vehicle&Dosing&

Survival,&Body&Weight,&Disease&Onset&&&Stage&Scoring&

120&days&

Early&Cull&Cohort&

G93A&SOD1&OverKExpression&

Rotarod,&Grip&Strength&&&&&Open&Field&Tests&

90&days&

ExZvivo&Analysis&  Histology:&Motor&neuron&

counts&  RNA&processing&efficiency&

Background:&C57BL/6.&3&dose&groups,&aged&and&young&cohorts,&oral&gavage,&6days/week&

WT&Mice&&(Aged&3m&&&18m)&

Month&0& Month&6&

Chroneuro&or&Vehicle&Dosing&

Survival,&Body&Weight,&Disease&Onset&&&Stage&Scoring&

Young&&&Aged&Mice&

Biochemical&Readouts&  TDPK43&

localizaBon&  UbiquiBn&

localizaBon&&  RNA&processing&

efficiency&  RNA&ediBng&&

Histology&  TDPK43&localizaBon&  UbiquiBn&deposits&  Motor&neuron&counts&Other Ex-vivo Analysis   RNA processing efficiency

InZvivo&Brain&Stem&Analysis&  MRI:&

NeurodegeneraBon&&  MRS:&Metabolic&

changes&

3&doses,&oral&gavage,&6days/week,&cohorts&n=20,&4&week&duraBon&

Week&0&

Week&4&

Chroneuro&or&Vehicle&Dosing&

Survival,&Body&Weight,&Onset&&&Stage&Scoring&

TDPK43&Model&

Rotarod,&Grip&Strength&&&Open&Field&Tests&

ALS&TDPZ43&Mice&(virally&

transfected)&

Control Chroneuro

TDP-43 3/27

ALS Non-ALS

Tissue sample Band present at correct size?

(±10%) 151 ALS YES (231 bp)

152 ALS YES (232 bp)

153 Non-ALS NO

154 Non-ALS NO

Primer& ALS& NonZALS&151& 152& 153& 154&

TARDBP1&5/9& 1& 0& 1& 1&TARDBP1&5/13& 1& 1& 0& 0&TARDBP1&5/17& 1& 1& 1& 1&TARDBP1&5/21& 1& 1& 1& 0&TARDBP1&5/25& 1& 0& 1& 1&TARDBP1&9/13& 1& 1& 0& 1&TARDBP1&9/17& 1& 1& 1& 1&TARDBP1&9/21& 1& 0& 1& 1&TARDBP1&9/25& 1& 0& 0& 1&TARDBP1&13/21& 0& 0& 0& 0&TARDBP1&13/25& 1& 0& 0& 1&TARDBP1&17/21& 1& 1& 1& 1&TARDBP1&17/25& 1& 1& 1& 1&TARDBP1&21/25& 1& 1& 1& 1&

Primer& ALS& NonZALS&151& 152& 153& 154&

TARDBP1&3/11& 1& 1& 1& 1&TARDBP1&3/15& 1& 0& 1& 0&TARDBP1&3/19& 0& 0& 0& 0&TARDBP1&3/23& 1& 1& 0& 1&TARDBP1&3/27& 1& 1& 0& 0&TARDBP1&11/15& 1& 0& 1& 0&TARDBP1&11/19& 0& 0& 1& 1&TARDBP1&11/23& 1& 1& 1& 1&TARDBP1&11/27& 1& 1& 1& 1&TARDBP1&15/23& 1& 1& 1& 1&TARDBP1&15/27& 1& 1& 1& 1&TARDBP1&19/23& 1& 1& 1& 0&TARDBP1&19/27& 0& 0& 1& 1&TARDBP1&23/27& 1& 1& 1& 1&

TDP-43 19/27

ALS Non-ALS

Tissue sample Band present at correct size?

(±10%) 151 ALS NO

152 ALS NO

153 Non-ALS YES (366 bp)

154 Non-ALS YES (365 bp)

11022000 11105000 3 5 9 11 13 15 19 21 23 25 27

17

ALS

Non-ALS

11022000 11105000 3 5 9 11 13 15 19 21 23 25 27

17

Key Present in 2 of 2 ALS samples and not in any non-ALS samples

Present in 2 of 2 non-ALS samples and not in any ALS samples