digital visitors and residents: project feedback

50
DEPARTMENT FOR CONTINUING EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY-ASSISTED LIFELONG LEARNING 9 th December 2011 Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback Developing Digital Literacies - #jiscdiglit Visitors & Residents - #vandr David White (Co-PI) @daveowhite University of Oxford Dr. Alison Le Cornu University of Oxford Dr. Lynn Silipigni Connaway (Co-PI) OCLC Research Dr. Donna Lancllos University of North Carolina, Charlotte

Upload: jisc-elearning

Post on 06-May-2015

10.798 views

Category:

Education


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Students and staff have been developing their own digital literacies for years and successfully integrating them into their social and professional activities. The Visitors and Residents project has been capturing these literacies by interviewing participants within four educational stages from secondary school to experienced scholars. Using the Visitors and Residents idea as a framework the project has been mapping what motivates individuals and groups to engage with the web for learning. We have been exploring the information-seeking and learning strategies that are evolving in both personal and professional contexts. In this presentation we will discuss these emerging ‘user owned’ literacies and how they might integrate with institutional approaches to developing digital literacies. We also will discuss the Visitors and Residents mapping process and how this could be utilised by projects as a tool for reflecting on existing and potential literacies and the development of services and systems. David White, Co-manager , Technology Assisted Lifelong Learning, University of Oxford Lynn Silipigni Connaway, Ph.D., Senior Research Scientist, OCLC Research

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

DEPARTMENT FOR CONTINUING EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY-ASSISTED LIFELONG LEARNING

9th December 2011

Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

Developing Digital Literacies - #jiscdiglit

Visitors & Residents - #vandr

David White (Co-PI)

@daveowhite

University of Oxford

Dr. Alison Le Cornu

University of Oxford

Dr. Lynn Silipigni Connaway (Co-PI)

OCLC Research

Dr. Donna Lancllos

University of North Carolina, Charlotte

Page 2: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

Lynn Silipigni Connaway, Ph.D. Senior Research Scientist OCLC Research

David White (@daveowhite) Co-Manager Technology Assisted Lifelong Learning University of Oxford

Donna Lanclos, Ph.D. Associate Professor for Anthropological Research University of North Carolina, Charlotte

Alison Le Cornu, Ph.D. Research assistant Technology Assisted Lifelong Learning University of Oxford

Page 3: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

‘I just type it into Google and see what comes up.’ (UKS2)

Page 4: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

‘I always stick with the first thing that comes up on Google because I think that’s the most popular site which means that’s the most correct.’ (USS1)

Page 5: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

‘I knew that the internet wouldn’t give me a wrong answer.’

(UKS4)

Page 6: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

Background •The Digital Information Seeker: Report – Connaway, et al.

2010 •Thriving in the 21st Century: Learning Literacies for the Digital Age (LLiDA Project) – Beetham. et al. 2009

•Not ‘Natives’ & ‘Immigrants’ but ‘Visitors’ & ‘Residents’ (blog post) – White. 2008

•Information Behaviour of the Researcher of the Future – Nicholas. et al. 2008

•‘If it is too inconvenient I’m not going after it:’ Convenience as a Critical Factor in Information-seeking Behaviors.” – Connaway, et al. 2011

Page 7: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

Even confident internet users often lack evaluative and critical skills.

LLiDA project: http://www.academy.gcal.ac.uk/llida/

Page 8: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

DEPARTMENT FOR CONTINUING EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY-ASSISTED LIFELONG LEARNING

Digital Visitor Digital Resident

Page 9: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

Visitor Resident

Video: goo.gl/dny1h

Paper: goo.gl/RFSLz

Page 10: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

Visitor Resident Unseen Instrumental Functional Individual

Visible

Networked

Communicative

Communal

Page 11: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback
Page 12: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

Page 12

Phase 2: Months 7-12 Establishing, Embedding, and Experienced Add 15 to original 30 = 45 participants

Phase 3: Months 13-24

Track 24 participants Online survey of 400 students and scholars

Phase 4: Months 25-36

Emerging 6 students

Page 13: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

Phase 1 participant demographics

• 30 participants • 19 females, 11 males • 21 Caucasian, 3 African-American, 1 Caucasian-

Thai, 1 Hispanic, 4 unidentified • 15 secondary students • 15 university students

Page 14: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

Methodology:

•Interviews •Diaries •Survey •Mapping

Page 15: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

Interview Questions

1. Describe the things you enjoy doing with technology and the web each week.

-------- 6. If you had a magic wand, what would your

ideal way of getting information be? How would you go about using the systems and services? When? Where? How?

Page 16: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

Code book I. Place

II. Sources

III. Tools

IV. Agency

V. Situation/context

VI. Quotes

VII. Contact

VIII. Technology Ownership

IX. Network used

Page 17: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

Code book IV. Agency

A. Evaluation

B. Decision/Choice

1. Convenience

2. Familiarity

3. Repetition

4. Relevance

5. Authority/Legitimacy

6. Available time

Etc.

Page 18: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

Visitor Resident

Personal

Institutional

Engagement Maps

Page 19: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

UKU3

Page 20: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

USS4

Page 21: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

USU3

Page 22: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

Programmatically?

•Map the Code book to the Visitors and Residents continuum

•Compare the mappings between

Educational stages

Page 23: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

Questions?

Page 24: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

Information-seeking cycle

Page 25: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

‘I simply just type it into Google and just see what comes up’ (UKS4)

Page 26: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

Sources

Page 27: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

UKU3

?

Page 28: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

Contact

Page 29: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

Email vs IM ‘My email is also like the most important way of contacting people, especially through the school...’ (USU7 )

Page 30: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

The power of convenience

Page 31: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

Agency

Page 32: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

Convergence

“Google doesn’t judge me” (UKF3)

Page 33: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

People

Page 34: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

‘Oh, definitely one of my teachers just being able to appear, definitely. Just to be able to have maybe a professor or someone that is an expert in that area, and just for them to be there when I want them to, so that if I don’t get something they can explain it to me. Because that’s the other thing, it’s more verbal communication that I find easier, so not always the website, although I do usually use the internet it’s not my preferred choice.’ (UKS4)

Page 35: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

Questions?

Page 36: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

Open Answer Resources

Page 37: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

Do you think education is about the 'answers' themselves or the process of getting to those answers? A: Answers B: The process of getting to those answers.

Page 38: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

Sources

Page 39: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

‘Freely available tertiary literature, accessibly and neutrally summarised from reliable secondary and primary sources, in an ongoing process of good faith collaboration involving both experts and non-experts.’

(Martin Poulter of Wikimedia)

Page 40: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

‘The problem with Wikipedia is it’s too easy. You can go to Wikipedia, you can get an answer, you don’t actually learn anything, you just get an answer.’ (USU6 – quoting a teacher)

Page 41: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

‘Perfect thing, I think it would be that all the useful, accurate, reliable information would like glow a different colour or something so I could tell without wasting my time going through all of them’ (UKS2)

Page 42: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

Education is about questions

The web is about answers

Page 43: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

‘Do they actually fail you?’ ‘They don’t fail you but you get ridiculed in front of everyone for sourcing Wikipedia.’ (USS3)

Page 44: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

Black Market

Learning

http://wp.me/pLtlj-fH

Page 45: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

Phase 3 (Mar 2012 – Mar 2013)

•Survey •Diaries •Phase 2 coding •Triangulation

Page 46: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

Outputs – January 2012

•Report •Engagement maps •Emerging findings •Implications

•Video •Project discussion

Page 47: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

Lynn Silipigni Connaway, Ph.D. Senior Research Scientist OCLC Research [email protected]

David White (@daveowhite) Co-Manager Technology Assisted Lifelong Learning University of Oxford [email protected]

Thanks

Page 48: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

Selected Readings

Beetham, Helen, Lou McGill, and Allison Littlejohn. Thriving in the 21st Century: Learning Literacies for the Digital Age (LLiDA Project). Glasgow: The Caledonian Academy, Glasgow Caledonian University, 2009. http://www.academy.gcal.ac.uk/llida/LLiDAReportJune2009.pdf.

Connaway, Lynn Silipigni, and Timothy J. Dickey. The Digital

Information Seeker: Report of the Findings from Selected OCLC, RIN, and JISC User Behaviour Projects. 2010. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/publications/reports/2010/digitalinformationseekerreport.pdf.

Connaway, Lynn Silipigni, Timothy J. Dickey, and Marie L. Radford. “‘If

it is too inconvenient I’m not going after it:’ Convenience as a Critical Factor in Information-seeking Behaviors.” Library & Information Science Research 33, no. 3 (2011): 179-90.

Page 49: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

Selected Readings

Nicholas, David. Rowlands, Ian. Huntingdon, Paul. Information

Behaviour of the Researcher of the Future: A CIBER Briefing Paper. London: CIBER, 2008. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/reppres/gg_final_keynote_11012008.pdf.

White, Dave. “Not ‘Natives’ & ‘Immigrants’ but ‘Visitors’ &

‘Residents.’” Posted on TALL Blog, July 23, 2008. http://tallblog.conted.ox.ac.uk/index.php/2008/07/23/not-natives-immigrants-but-visitors-residents/.

White, David. Le Cornu, Alison. “Visitors and Residents: A New

Typology for Online Engagement.” First Monday 16, no. 9 (2011). http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/3171/3049.

Page 50: Digital Visitors and Residents: Project Feedback

Exam room: zeligfilm http://www.flickr.com/photos/zeligdoc/4536875415/ Vending machines: midoisyu http://www.flickr.com/photos/midorisyu/752223850/ Cycle route: Damian Cugley http://www.flickr.com/photos/midorisyu/752223850/ Glasses face: peterburnham http://www.flickr.com/photos/pburnham/5238764188/ 3 Generations (Street at night): Gilderic http://www.flickr.com/photos/lanier67/5253473681 Porto Riberia: lanier67 http://www.flickr.com/photos/lanier67/5253473681

Picture credits