donald s. miller
DESCRIPTION
Effects of the Single Address Space Paradigm on CPU and OS Design for a Distributed Computer System. Donald S. Miller. What’s a Paradigm?. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
ASU 64-bit OS Group 04/21/23 1
Effects of the Single Address Space Effects of the Single Address Space ParadigmParadigm
on CPU and OS Design for aon CPU and OS Design for aDistributed Computer System Distributed Computer System
Donald S. Miller
ASU 64-bit OS Group 04/21/23 2
What’s a Paradigm?What’s a Paradigm? Constellation of beliefs, values, techniques and so on shared by
the members of a given community that implicitly define the legitimate problems and methods of a research field for succeeding generations of practitioners1
attracts an enduring group of adherents away from competing modes of scientific activity
sufficiently open-ended to leave all sorts of problems for the group of practitioners to resolve
Includes law theory, application and instrumentation together Examples:
Aristotle’s physics, Ptolemaic astronomy, Galileo’s motion studies, Copernican astronomy, Newtonian mechanics, Einstein's relativity
and Process-Oriented OSs and Single Address Space Operating
Systems
____________________1. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd Edition, Thomas S. Kuhn, University of Chicago Press, 1996.
ASU 64-bit OS Group 04/21/23 3
Process-Oriented ParadigmProcess-Oriented Paradigm
Each process runs in it’s own virtual address space virtual addresses are (process) context dependent
Process boundaries encapsulate and bind temporary virtual address spaces, execution state, objects, protection domains and principals
Persistent storage is in a separate namespace - the file system
Message-based communication or RPC on top of message passing is the most prevalent mechanism for data exchange and synchronization between executing entities
Page-based object granularity Threads encapsulated within a process - domain crossing and
machine migration without an address space and thread context switch essentially impossible
Layered system structure - operating system kernel and services and user-level servers and programs layered on top of each other
ASU 64-bit OS Group 04/21/23 4
Process-Oriented Paradigm (continued)Process-Oriented Paradigm (continued)
Obtaining operating system services requires a domain crossing AND entry into privileged supervisor mode
Process and data migration difficult - involves creating a new namespace for data (DSM) and dealing with distinct machine namespaces for code
Difficult to directly support OOD and OOP - preprocessors and OS run-time systems are needed
OS support for protection implementation protection policy are intertwined
Access authorization, resource accounting and name services typically require kernel services or intervention
Copy set management is usually page-based and requires broadcasts reducing scalability
Network-wide fault tolerance requires additional mechanisms
ASU 64-bit OS Group 04/21/23 5
Process-Oriented Paradigm (concluded)Process-Oriented Paradigm (concluded)
Examples of Process-Oriented operating systems Industrial
MULTICS, UNIX, MVS, Mach, Chorus, VMS, NT Research
Exokernel, L4, SPIN
ASU 64-bit OS Group 04/21/23 6
Single Address Space ParadigmSingle Address Space Paradigm
All programs run in a single virtual address space that covers all levels of the memory hierarchy, all nodes of a network and persists for the life of the computer system. This leads to the following 5 properties.
1. Permanent and unique binding of all data and code to virtual addresses.
2. The ability to freely reassociate memory objects, access rights, protection domains, virtual addresses, principals and threads.
3. A single network-wide namespace backed by the local demand paged memory management on every node and that includes all levels of the memory cache hierarchy.
4. Object, thread and protection domain mobility across the entire network-wide virtual address namespace.
5. Separation of ownership of code and ownership of execution of a computation.
ASU 64-bit OS Group 04/21/23 7
Single Address Space Paradigm Single Address Space Paradigm (continued)(continued)
All programs run in the same virtual address space virtual addresses are not context dependent
Execution state, objects, protection domains and principals are not bound to virtual addresses and hence not bound to each other
Persistent storage is in the same virtual address namespace
Shared memory is the most prevalent mechanism for data exchange and synchronization
Object granularity can be independent of page granularity Threads can travel throughout the virtual address space
without an address space switch or a thread context switch System architecture can be flat and modular - operating
system services, environment servers and user-level programs can be made accessible to each other and themselves via simple procedure calls and returns
ASU 64-bit OS Group 04/21/23 8
Single Address Space Paradigm Single Address Space Paradigm (continued)(continued)
Obtaining operating system services is orthogonal to entry into privileged supervisor mode
Process and Data Migration is straight-forward - objects and threads exist at the same virtual addresses on all nodes; kernel structures can be replicated or represented by surrogates on different nodes
OOD and OOP can be directly supported - a protection domain can translate directly into an instantiation of an object class available at the user level - preprocessors and OS run-time systems are not needed; base classes can be extended via overrides at the user level
Clean separation of OS support for protection implementation and user-level definition of protection policy is simple
Access authorization, resource accounting and name services can be done at the user level
The common virtual address space provides simple scaleable per object copy set management and a lowest level cache for fault tolerance
ASU 64-bit OS Group 04/21/23 9
Single Address Space Paradigm Single Address Space Paradigm (concluded)(concluded)
Examples of Single Address Space Operating Systems
Without additional protection hardware assistance Opal, Mungi, Arius, Carthage (KFRPC)
With additional protection hardware assistance AS/400, MONADS, ToM, Carthage (FRPC), Sombrero
ASU 64-bit OS Group 04/21/23 10
Sombrero PrincipalsSombrero Principals
ASU 64-bit OS Group 04/21/23 11
SYSTEM ARCHITECTURESYSTEM ARCHITECTURE Process Oriented OSProcess Oriented OS Single Address Single Address
Space OS Space OS Layered system structure -
operating system kernel and services and user-level servers and programs layered on top of each other
System architecture can be flat and modular - operating system services, environment servers and user-level programs can be made accessible to each other and themselves via simple procedure calls and returns
ASU 64-bit OS Group 04/21/23 12
SYSTEM ARCHITECTURESYSTEM ARCHITECTURE Process Oriented OSProcess Oriented OS Single Address Single Address
Space OSSpace OS Obtaining operating system
services requires a domain crossing AND entry into privileged supervisor mode
Obtaining operating system services is orthogonal to entry into privileged supervisor mode
ASU 64-bit OS Group 04/21/23 13
1 1/ 1 6/ 98 4 : 32 PM A SU 6 4-b it O S G ro up 1 4
Essence of the Multiple to Single Address SpaceParadigm Shift
Going from multiple namespaces in which object names canvary and are determined by the logical structuresthey are associated with, e.g., process, file orrecord, or by the physical container that holdsthem, e.g., cache, RAM or disk
Going to a single network-wide namespace in which objectnames are invariant and are determined by theunique virtual addresses used to access them
Since VAs are directly operated upon by CPUs, the focusshifts from naming objects by the changing logical orphysical structures associated with them to using VAs as theprimary identifying/locating /accessing mechanism for allobjects wherever they are and whenever they are used.
ASU 64-bit OS Group 04/21/23 14
SYSTEM ARCHITECTURESYSTEM ARCHITECTURE Process Oriented OSProcess Oriented OS Single Address Single Address
Space OSSpace OS Difficult to directly support
OOD and OOP - preprocessors and OS run-time systems are needed
OOD and OOP can be directly supported - a protection domain can translate directly into an instantiation of an object class available at the user level - preprocessors and OS run-time systems are not needed; base classes can be extended via overrides at the user level
ASU 64-bit OS Group 04/21/23 15
SYSTEM ARCHITECTURESYSTEM ARCHITECTURE Process Oriented OSProcess Oriented OS Single Address Single Address
Space OSSpace OS OS support for protection
implementation protection policy are intertwined
Clean separation of OS support for protection implementation and user-level definition of protection policy is simple
ASU 64-bit OS Group 04/21/23 16
SYSTEM ARCHITECTURESYSTEM ARCHITECTURE Process Oriented OSProcess Oriented OS Single Address Single Address
Space OSSpace OS Access authorization,
resource accounting and name services typically require kernel services or intervention
Access authorization, resource accounting and name services can be done at the user level