189
CHAPTER-VII
MARKETING OF PUBLIC ISSUES
Issue management by merchant bankers mainly focuses on three basic
functions viz, origination, underwriting and distribution of securities. Distribution
services of lead managers include the activities and cost incurred in selling and
delivering the securities to the investors. Along with performing the function as a
bridge between the issuing company and the investors, merchant bankers also have to
generate interest and build the confidence of the investors in the capital market. So
distribution is a function of sale of securities to the ultimate investors. This service,
managed by lead manager, is performed by brokers and dealers in securities who
maintain regular direct contact with the ultimate investors. Merchant bankers make
efforts for the promotion and marketing of the issue. They plan, co-ordinate and
control the entire activities relating to public issues and direct different agencies to
contribute to the successful marketing of securities. In India, lead managers do not
own an issue before its distribution to general public. They simply underwrite and
arrange the distribution through the underwriters.
The liberalization and globalization of Indian capital market has widened the
geographical and demographical range of investors. Now, issuing companies call the
applications for their shares not only from domestic investors, but from the foreign
investors. Similarly, efforts are on to include every strata of society in the list of
investors. Advancement of technology in communication and data processing has
posed a new challenge for the merchant bankers in the area of marketing of public
issues. Today, merchant bankers need top care about being in the centre of
‘information flow’ rather than in the centre of ‘capital flow’.
The present chapter aims to study the responsibilities of lead merchant bankers
regarding marketing of public issues, SEBI Guidelines on public issue advertisement
and the response of the investors for the public issues of equity and debt instruments
during the period under review.
7.1 Market Design of Public Issues The market design of public issues is provided in the provisions of the
Companies Act, 1956. It deals with the issue, listing and allotment of securities. In
addition to this, SEBI Disclosures and Investor Protection Guidelines, 2000 as
190
amended from time to time prescribe a series of disclosures about the issuing
company, management, promoters, project, risk factors and eligibility norms for
accessing the market.
7.1.1 Responsibilities of Lead Manager(s) in Marketing of Public Issue
The process of marketing of securities in primary market starts with the
preparation of prospectus. The success of public issue depends upon the excellent
marketing techniques worked out by the lead manager. It covers the institutional and
retail distribution capacity, equity research capability, retail distribution network,
advertising strategies and international distribution capability. A general standardized
methodology of marketing may not be ideal for all issues. It may be worked out on a
case to case basis depending on the nature of public issues in hand.
The responsibilities of lead merchant banker(s) for marketing of public issues
may be summarized as under:
(i) Deciding the time of floating the issue
Timing of the public issue is an important decision taken by lead manager. It
is an important marketing strategy and is a futuristic decision which involves the
expected market conditions during the time of the issue. It is very strategic decision to
determine the right time for the public issue.
The main considerations with lead manager for deciding the time of issue
include the present and probable future market conditions, research reports by
financial analysts, clashing with mega issues, major economic and political events in
the country and response of the investors to recent public issues. In the words of
Ritter, “Marketing timing ability of (lead manager) is manifested in the tendency for
firms to issue after high market returns and before low market returns.”1
(ii) Appointment of Printers for issue stationery
The printers are involved in the process of printing and distribution of issue
related stationery. Merchant bankers maintain a list of approved printers and the
company in consultation with the lead manager appoints printer after considering the
cost and quality of service. Lead merchant banker is responsible to ensure the printing
of prospectus, application forms, posters, brochures and other stationery. It must
ensure itself the accuracy of statements made and application form and confirm that
the prospectus is as per standard prescribed by the stock exchange. 1. Ritter, Investment Banking and Securities Issuance.
191
Main functions of the printer include the layout and design of the offer
document, application form, printing of prospectus, application form, brochures etc.
However, nowadays, a copy of the offer document is placed on the website of lead
managers and syndicate members associated with the issue. A copy of prospectus is
also made available on the website of SEBI.
(iii) Dispatch and Distribution of Issue Material
It is the duty of lead manager that the public issue offer document and other
issue related material is dispatched to the designated stock exchange(s), brokers,
underwriters, bankers to the issue etc. in advance as agreed upon. In case of rights
issue, lead manager must ensure that the abridged letter of offer is dispatched to all
shareholders at least three days before the date of opening of the issue.
(iv) Appointment of Advertising Agency
However sound the project is or the promoters of the issuer company are, the
success of the public issue can be attributed to the advertising agency and its
campaign for marketing the issue. Merchant bankers maintain a list of advertising
agencies having experience and expertise in the publicity of public issues. Normally,
merchant bankers call upon various agencies to make a presentation on their
advertising and publicity strategy. Based on their presentation and further
consultation, the advertising agency is selected. The Company decides on the size of
the advertising budget in consultation with the lead manager. Then the advertising
agency and lead manager draw up a publicity campaign.
(v) Publicity Campaign
The selected advertising agency is responsible for carrying on publicity
campaign for wide distribution of public issue. It covers the preparation of all
publicity material including prospectus, brochures, announcements, advertisements in
the media, hoardings etc. Lead merchant banker plays a key role by helping the choice
of media, determining the size and the publication in which the advertisement should
appear. Along with print media, audio-visual media, hoardings, banners, posters,
publicity campaign may also be carried through the followings:
(a) Road Shows
As a part of the marketing campaign, the issuer company may conduct
road shows at various places. In a road show, the lead manager accompanied
by a team of senior officials of the company hold conference and make
presentation in order to shift the demand schedule for the company’s security.
192
The groups of institutional investors, high net worth investors, brokers and
sub-brokers attend the road show. The team makes a presentation about the
issuing company and answers the questions raised by the participants.
Through road shows, the company comes in face to face with investors and
interacts with them. The points to be highlighted in the road shows cover the
performance of the company, reputation of the promoters and the projects of
the company.
(b) Research Coverage
Research coverage, forecasts and recommendations by financial
analysts are important tools in the marketing of securities especially in the
issue of equities. All reputed merchant bankers have their own research teams
and they publish research reports about the IPOs in various financial dailies.
(c) Press Conferences and Investors’ Conferences
Press conferences for public issues are organized by advertising
agency at different centres having concentration of investors. Sometimes,
visits by selected members of the press are also organized to the issuing
company and briefed about the importance of the project for wide publicity of
the issue.
Similarly, investors’ meetings are held at various cities where it is
expected that their interest could be invoked in the public issue. Cities with
stock exchanges are favourable centres for such meetings. Investors’ meetings
are also arranged in foreign countries to create interest of NRIs in the public
issue.
(d) Network of Merchant Bankers
Leading merchant bankers having specialization in the area of issue
management have wide network to create investors interest in public issue.
They maintain list of potential investors and generally have good links with
qualified institutional investors and high net worth investors. Some merchant
bankers have registered broking firms as their sister concerns having direct
link with the investors.
For example, Enam has a network of 5000 dedicated franchises, Karvy
has 448 branches and 275 business associates scattered all over India, SBI
Capital Markets and Kotak Mahindra Capital Company are the subsidiaries of
banks having a network of branches. IDBI Capital Markets Ltd operates
193
through 25 branches and 10,000 sub brokers/ agents spread across the country.
JM Morgan Stanley, DSP Merrill Lynch and HSBC Securities and Capital
Markets (India) Ltd have worldwide network. Private merchant bankers like
Edelweiss, Centrum and Allianz Securities have also wide network of sub
brokers in India.
7.1.2 SEBI Guidelines on Issue Advertisement Disclosure and Investor Protection Guidelines issued by SEBI in 2000 as
amended from time to time provide guidelines regarding advertisement for public
issues. The lead merchant banker has been made responsible to ensure compliance
with the guidelines on advertisement by the issuing company. As per SEBI guidelines,
an issue advertisement should have the following features:
It should be truthful, fair, and clear and should not contain any statement that
is untrue or misleading.
It should reproduce information contained in an offer document in full and
disclose all relevant facts and not be restricted to select extracts relating to that
item.
It should be set forth in a clear, concise and understandable language.
It should not contain statements which promise or guarantee rapid increase in
profits.
It shall not contain any information that is not contained in the offer document.
It should not appear in the form of crawlers i.e. the advertisement which runs
simultaneo`1usly with the programme in a narrow strip at the bottom of the
television screen.
No slogans, expletives or non factual and unsubstantial titles should appear in
the issue advertisement of offer document.
In case of issue advertisement on television screen (a) the risk factors should
not be scrolled on the screen (b) the advertisement should advise viewer to
refer to the red herring prospectus/ offer document for detail.
No issue advertisement should be released without giving ‘Risk Factors’ in
respect of the concerned issue, provided that an issue opening/ closing
advertisement which does not contain the highlights need not contain risk
factors.
194
If any advertisement carries any financial data, it should also contain data for
the past three years and include particulars relating to sales, gross profit, net
profit, share capital, reserves, earning per share, dividend and the book values.
All issue advertisements in newspapers, magazines, brochures and pamphlets
containing highlights relating to any issue should also contain risk factors
giving equal importance in all respects including the print size.
No advertisement shall include any issue slogans or brand name for the issue
except the normal commercial name of the company or commercial brand of
the product already in use.
No product advertisement of the issuer should contain any direct or indirect
reference to the performance of the issuer during the period (a) commencing
from the date of meeting of Board of Directors in which the issue is approved
till the filing of draft offer document with the SEBI, and (b) the period
commencing from the filing offer document with the SEBI till the date of
allotment of securities.
An advertisement should not be issued stating that the issue has been fully
subscribed or oversubscribed during the period the issue is open for
subscription, except to the effect that the issue is open or closed, (a)
announcement regarding closure of the issue should not be made except on the
last closing date, and (b) if the issue is fully subscribed before the last closing
date as stated in the offer document, the announcement should not be made
after the issue is fully subscribed and such announcement should also be made
on the date on which the issue is to be closed.
Announcement regarding closure of issue should be made only after the lead
merchant banker is satisfied that at least 90% of the issue has been subscribed
and a certificate has been obtained to that effect from the registrar to the issue.
No incentive, apart from the permissible underwriting commission and
brokerage, shall be offered through any advertisement to anyone associated
with marketing the issue.
In case there is a reservation for the NRIs, the issue advertisement should
specify the same and indicate the place in India from where the individual NRI
applicant can procure application forms.
195
7.1.3 Statutory Advertisements The following advertisements have to be statutorily released (1) Issue announcement advertisement at least 10 days before opening of the
issue. This advertisement contains an abridged version of the prospectus.
(2) Issue opening advertisement on the day of opening of the issue.
(3) Issue closing advertisement on the day of closing of the issue.
(4) The basis of allotment advertisement after finalization of allotment.
7.1.4 Lead Merchant Banker and Observance of Advertisement Code
The lead manager to the issue is responsible to ensure strict compliance with
the code of advertisement by the issuer company set out above and for that purpose
the lead manager should comply the following:
(1) To obtain undertaking from the issuer as part of Memorandum of
Understanding to be entered into by the lead merchant banker with the issuer
company to the effect that the issuer company shall not directly or indirectly
release, during any conference or at any other time, any material or
information which is not contained in the offer document.
(2) To ensure that the issuer company obtains approval in respect of all issue
advertisements and publicity materials from the lead merchant banker
responsible for marketing the issue and also ensure availability of copies of all
issue related materials with the lead merchant banker at least till the allotment
is completed.
(3) With respect to research reports, the lead merchant banker shall ensure that it
is prepared only on the basis of published information as contained in the offer
document and the advertisement code is observed while circulating the
research report and that the risk factors are reproduced wherever highlights are
given, as in case of an advertisement.
7.1.5 Recent Marketing Strategies for Public Issues Marketing strategies adopted for public issues aim at educating the investors
for active participation in capital market and reducing the cost of issue as also the risk
of investors and the issuer companies in the form of overpricing and under pricing
respectively. With these objectives in mind, marketing strategies are developed from
196
time to time to make Indian capital market more efficient. Some of the recent
marketing strategies adopted in new issue market in India are as follows:
(i) Marketing IPOs through Secondary Market ( e-IPO)
SEBI has approved a proposal of marketing IPOs through the stock exchange.
The system uses the existing infrastructure of stock exchange (terminals, brokers and
system) being used for secondary market transactions for marketing IPOs through
book building route. A company proposing to issue capital to public through on-line
system of stock exchange has to comply with section 55 to 68 A of the companies
Act, 1956 and DIP Guidelines of SEBI.
The on-line IPO system is designed to reduce information asymmetry between
bidders and allows the underwriters to aggregate orders and ‘build the book’. The
bidding begins simultaneously in several cities. The investors can see all the other
bids placed on the issue. The demand for the new issue is visible in real time to all
bidders on their computer screens and also available on the National Stock Exchange
(NSE) website. This new internet based IPO offering system is known as NEAT-
National Exchange Automated Trading.
On-line IPO system at NSE was launched with the book building issue of
Hughes Software Ltd in September, 1999 and got a good public response. Till March,
2007, a total of 199 issuer companies have used this NSE on-line IPO system.
Subsequently, the BSE also augmented its traditional book building offering
mechanism with an internet based bidding system, very similar to the NEAT-IPO
mechanism. This system reduces the cost of the issue as well as time for listing of
securities.
The lead manager is responsible for co-ordination of all the activities among
various intermediaries connected to the issue/ system. The names of brokers
appointed for the issue along with the names of other intermediaries should be
disclosed in the offer document and application from.
(ii) Green Shoe Option (Over Allotment of Securities)
The green shoe option is the most useful tactic strategy in an unanticipated
bull market. In a volatile market with little strong direction, provision of over
allotment is basically the best marketing device. The lead manager offers added
securities to syndicate members/ brokers with the expectation that they will put forth a
strong sales effort.
197
In India, provisions for green shoe option are stated in DIP Guidelines under
chapter VIII-A. It states that the issuing company shall appoint one of the merchant
bankers/BRLMs from among the issue management team, as the ‘Stabilization Agent’
(SA), who will be responsible for the price stabilization process, if required. The SA
shall enter into an agreement with the issuing company, prior to filing of offer
document with SEBI, clearly stating all the terms and conditions relating to this
option including the charges/expenses to be incurred by SA for this purpose.
The SA shall also enter into an agreement with the promoters or pre issue
shareholders who will lend their shares under the provisions of this chapter,
specifying the maximum number of shares that may be borrowed from promoters or
the shareholders, which shall not be in excess of 15% of the total issue size.
During the period of study, a number of issuing companies has availed of this
option. ICICI Bank is the first company to use this option for the public issue of
equity shares of Rs. 3050 crore in April, 2004.
(iii) Safety Net (Buy Back of Shares)
Safety net is the protection to investors against the fall in the market price of
the IPO below its offer price during a particular period of time. Promoters and
merchant bankers provide standby arrangement to buy shares from public if the
market quotations go below the offer price during the statutory period.
Safety net aims at wooing more and more potential investors to subscribe for
the IPOs. This mechanism helps the advertising agency to the issue and the lead
merchant banker in its campaign for marketing the IPOs. So safety net is actually a
put option given to the investors, but not by the issuing company. It gives the right but
not the obligation to the investors to sell the shares to the entity offering the option at
a particular price within a stipulated period.
Any safety net or buy back arrangement of shares proposed in any issue
should be finalized by the issuing company with the lead merchant banker in advance
and should be disclosed in the offer document.
Bangalore based Software Company Opto Circuits Ltd offered a safety net to
its shareholders for six months in its IPO. Other companies which offered safety net
mechanism during the period under review included TCS Ltd, Shree Renuka Sugars
Ltd and ICICI Bank.
198
(iv) Target Marketing/ Branding the financial Instrument
Lead merchant bankers have been using the strategy of targeting the different
segments of investors in the market and branding the securities to create interest of the
investors in the public issues.
Different innovative financial instruments have been witnessed in the Indian
capital market especially after post reform period. Some of the new financial
instruments are Zero Coupon Bonds, Deep Discount Bonds, Third party Convertible
Debentures, Zero Coupon Convertible Note, Tax Saving Bonds, Cumulative
Convertible Preference Shares, Convertible (Partly and Fully) Debentures, Debt for
Equity Swap, Floating Rate Bonds etc.
During the period under review, bond issues of two financial Institutions
namely ICICI Ltd and IDBI Ltd dominated the debt issues in India. ICICI Ltd raised
an aggregate amount of Rs.18876.62 crore from 41 debt issues of Bonds. These
unsecured bonds were branded as ‘ICICI Safety Bonds.’ To target the different
classes of investors, the bonds were classified as:
(a) Tax Saving Bonds – The issue of these bonds aimed at that segment of
investors who wanted to save tax.
(b) Regular Income Bonds- These were aimed at investors from middle class and
retired persons.
(c) Money Multiplier Bonds – These bonds targeted long term investors requiring
secured income.
(d) Child Growth Bonds – These were long term bonds with 16 to 19 years
maturity period suitable for young investors to secure the future of their
children.
Different options were given to the investors under each category of bonds.
JM Morgan Stanley performed the leading role as lead manager to these bond issues
with a group of other merchant bankers in the role of lead managers and co-managers.
Similarly IDBI Ltd came out with 21 public issues of bonds by raising an
aggregate amount of Rs. 17323.38 crore during this period. The bonds issued by the
IDBI Ltd were branded as ‘IDBI FLEXIBLE BONDS’. Different types of bonds
targeted different types of investors like:
(a) IDBI Regular Income Bonds – These bonds provided fixed rate of interest
payable annually or bi-annually.
199
(b) IDBI Growing Interest Bonds – These bonds provided increasing rate of
interest with the passage of time.
(c) IDBI Multiplier Bonds – Bonds on which Lump sum amount was payable at
the end of maturity period, that is, 6 years and 7 months.
(d) IDBI Infrastructure (Tax Saving) Bonds – Bonds with annual interest option
and cumulative option.
These bond issues were lead managed by a group of merchant bankers acting
as lead managers and co-managers with SBI Capital Markets Ltd at the apex.
7.2 Public Response to Public Issues The result of extensive campaign for marketing of public issues is the ultimate
response by the public for subscription of shares. The reputation of lead merchant
banker (s) as an issue manager is at stake in this respect. If the issuing company is not
able to get public subscription to the extent of 90% of total issue size, the issue has to
be withdrawn and the money received on applications is refunded. This adversely
affects the reputation not only of the issuing company, but the lead merchant banker
also.
Since the period of economic reforms in India, the primary capital market has
been witnessing a structural transformation. Liberalization and globalization has
resulted in the widening and deepening of the market. The number of investors as
well as the financial instruments has increased. Public response to capital issues is the
indication of the confidence of the investors in the primary market, thus leading to the
development of the capital market.
This part of the chapter analyses the trends of public response to the public
issues of equity and debt instruments. In this section, number of public issues
subscribed at different levels, mean annual subscription ratio and the subscription
ratio of public issues managed by different merchant bankers during the period 1997-
98 to 2008-09 has been analysed.
7.2.1 Public Response to Equity Issues New issue market for equity shares witnessed several ups and downs with
respect to response from public. Subscription by public to new issues depends upon a
number of factors and the major factor is the developments in the secondary market of
shares.
200
7.2.2 Overview of Subscription Level of Public Issues of Equity Shares
Annual public response to equity issues at various levels of subscription has
been presented in the table 7.1
Table depicts the number of public issues of equity shares along with percentage to total annual issues subscribed by public at different levels of subscription. As shown in the table, primary market in 1997-98 showed a dismal picture as far as the subscription of public issues is concerned. Out of 58 equity issues floated during the year, 12 issues (20.68%) were subscribed less than one time while 39 issues (67.24%) were subscribed between one and 1.5 time. Only three issues could get subscription of more than three times. Depressed secondary market conditions during 1993 -95, stringent entry barriers guidelines issued by SEBI and decline in industrial growth have been the major reasons for the lack of investors’ interest in the primary market. Introduction of free pricing of public issues led to fair pricing of issues. This resulted in decline in under pricing/ returns on listing and had an adverse effect on the subscription of shares by the general public. Declining trend of 1997-98 continued in 1998-99 also. Out of 22 public issues of equity floated during the period, seven issues (31.81%) were subscribed less than one time and subscription to 9 issues (40.91%) was more than one time but less than 1.5 times. Only one issue was found to have got subscription over 25 times and another one got in the range of 10 to 25 times.
A favourable response to the primary equity market has been found from the public in 1999-2000. This has been the period of information technology and software boom. Out of 56 equity issues in this year, as many as 8 issues (14.28%) were subscribed more than 100 times and another three (5.36%) were subscribed between 75 to100 times. Further, 11 issues (19.64%) were subscribed between 10 to 25 times.
During the year 2000-01, although there was a rush in the new issue market of equity shares from information technology companies with small size, but investors did not respond well to these issues. A total of 52 issues (45.21%) were subscribed in the range of 1.00 to less than 1.5 times. Only 8 issues (6.95%) were subscribed over 10 times during 2000-01. Crash in secondary market in April 2000, and overvaluation of information technology companies and media industry were the major cause for investors’ lack of interest in primary market during this year. As many as five companies have to refund the application money to investors for lack of minimum subscription and two equity issues partially devolved upon the underwriters during this year.
201
Table 7.1 Extent of Oversubscription of Public Issues of Equity
No. of times Issue Subscribed 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 Total
Below 1.00 times 12 (20.68)
07 (31.81) - 23
(20.0) 02
(33.33) 01
(16.67) - - - 01 (1.18)
03 (3.33) - 49
(7.92) 1.0 to <1.5 39
(67.24) 09
(40.91) 01
(1.78) 52
(45.21) 02
(33.33) - 05 (17.24)
02 (6.90)
01 (0.98)
13 (20.68)
13 (14.44)
11 (52.38)
148 (23.94)
1.5 to <3.00 04 (6.89)
03 (13.64)
04 (7.14)
18 (15.65)
01 (16.67)
02 (33.33)
04 (13.79)
01 (3.45)
12 (11.76)
17 (20.0)
12 (13.33)
03 (14.28)
81 (13.11)
3.00 to < 5.00 01 (1.72)
01 (4.54)
05 (8.93)
07 (6.08)
01 (16.67)
01 (16.67)
02 (6.90)
01 (3.45)
14 (13.73)
10 (11.76)
10 (11.11)
03 (14.28)
56 (9.06)
5.00 to <10.00 01 (1.72) - 09
(16.07) 07
(6.08) - 01 (16.67)
08 (27.59)
06 (20.68)
16 (15.69)
13 (15.29)
11 (12.22)
02 (9.52)
74 (11.97)
10.00 to < 25.00 01 (1.72)
01 (4.54)
11 (19.64)
03 (2.61) - 01
(16.67) 05
(17.24) 08
(27.59) 26
(25.49) 08
(7.84) 05
(5.55) 01
(4.76) 70
(11.32) 25.00 to< 50.00 - 01
(4.54) 07
(12.50) 04
(3.48) - - 05 (17.24)
08 (27.59)
29 (28.43)
14 (16.47)
16 (17.78)
01 (4.76)
85 (13.75)
50.00 to <75.00 - - 07 (12.5)
01 (0.87) - - - 02
(6.90) 02
(1.96) 05
(5.88) 09
(10.0) - 26 (4.20)
75.00 to< 100 - - 03 (5.36) - - - - 01
(3.45) 01
(0.98) 02
(2.35) 05
(5.55) - 12 (1.94)
Above 100 times - - 08 (14.28) - - - - - 01
(0.98) 02
(2.35) 06
(6.67) - 17 (2.75)
Total 58 (9.38)
22 (3.56)
55 (8.90)
115 (18.61)
06 (0.97)
06 (0.97)
29 (4.69)
29 (4.69)
102 (16.50)
85 (13.76)
90 (14.56)
21 (3.40)
618 (100.0)
Note: -Figures in parentheses show the percentage of total public issues of equity at different levels of subscription. Source: - Compiled from offer documents, basis of allotment, Prime Database.
202
Investment activities in the primary market of equity remained subdued in the
years 2001-02 and 2002-03 also. Only six equity issues in each year were floated.
Subscription level in 2001-02 showed that all the six issues were subscribed below
5.00 times while only one was subscribed above 10 times.
The year 2003-04 witnessed an upsurge in primary market activities. It was
induced by buoyant secondary market, political stability and economic recovery. 8
equity issues (27.59%) of total 29 issues were subscribed 5 to 10 times by the public
while 10 issues (34.48%) were subscribed more than 10 times. However, one issuing
company had to refund application money due to lack of minimum subscription
during this year.
Continuing the same trend, response to equity issues was good in 2004-05. Of
the 29 equity issues floated, 8 issues (27.59%) were subscribed more than 10 times
but less than 25 times whereas subscription to another 8 issues was found in the range
of 25 to 50 times. One equity issue was subscribed even more than 75 times.
In 2005-06, 29 issues ( 28.43%) were subscribed between 25 times to 50 times
while 26 issues ( 25.49%) were found to have been subscribed between 10 to 25
times. One equity issue was subscribed even in the range of 75 to 100 times and
another one was subscribed more than 100 times. Active participation of Foreign
Institutional Investors (FIIs), Qualified Institutional Buyers (QIBs), strong
fundamentals of economy, positive investment climate and buoyant secondary market
induced public to participate actively in the primary market activities during 2005-06.
Favourable response to public issue of equity during 2005-06 continued in
2006-07 and also. However, 14 issues (16.47%) failed to elicit much response from
the public (less than 1.5 times). 17 equity issues (20%) were subscribed 1.5 times to
3.00 times, while another 14 issues (16.47%) were subscribed in the range of 25 to
50 times and two equity issues were subscribed more than 100 times. Similarly in
2007-08, five issues (5.55%) were subscribed between 75 to 100 times and another
six issues (6.67%) got more than 100 times subscription. Primary equity market could
not sustain the same trend in 2008-09 and 11 (52.38%) out of total 21 issues were
subscribed less than 1.5 times while another three issues got subscription between 3 to
5 times. Only one issue could reach to subscription level of 25 to 50 times.
203
7.2.3 Subscription by Retail Investors vis-à-vis All Categories of Investors
Table 7.2 depicts the response from the retail vis-à-vis all categories of
investors to the public issue of equity shares during the period under review. As is
clear from the table, mean value of over subscription by all categories of investors
was highest (44.33 times) in 1999-2000. It was followed by mean subscription of
28.56 times in 2007-08 and 22.79 times in 2004-05. Investors also responded
favourably to the public issues of equity shares in 2005-06 and 2006-07, when
average of the shares subscription has been 19.80 and 18.28 times respectively. On
the other hand, investors did not respond well to equity issues in 1997-98 and 2001-
02, when mean subscription ratio was just 1.47 and 1.42 times respectively. Even the
number of public issues has been only six each in the year 2001-02 and 2002-03.
Thus, the response from the public was very dismal.
The table also shows the co-efficient of variation in the subscription ratio of
different equity shares floated during the particular year. A high co-efficient of
variation (229.30%) has been found in 2000-01 showing high dispersion in the
subscription level of 115 equity issues during the year. This has been followed by
223.54% in 1998-99. Co-efficient of variation has been minimum (91.88%) in 2004-
05, depicting less variation in the subscription level of public issues of equity. While a
high standard deviation of 58.97 has been found in the subscription level of different
equity issues in 1999-2000, the same has been only 1.42 in 2001-02. It showed that
the issues have been subscribed evenly during the year.
The analysis further shows that good response has been received from the
retail investors in the year 1999-2000 who subscribed 30.12 times to the equity issues
in that year. This was followed by 19.89 and 16.57 times in 2004-05 and 2005-06
respectively. On the other hand, retail investors have not responded well in 1997-98
and 2001-02, when mean subscription was only 0.71 and 0.45 times respectively.
A high variation in the subscription ratio by retail investors, as shown by co-
efficient of variation was found in 1998-99 and 1997-98 which stood at 195.82% and
163.38% respectively. It means retail investors have different response level for good
and average issues.
204
Table 7.2 Subscription Ratio of Public Issue of Equity Shares by Retail Investors and by All Categories of
Investors
Years No. of issues
Retail Investors All Categories of Investors
Mean S.D. Co-efficient of variation
Min. Max. Mean S.D. Co-efficient of variation
Min. Max.
1997-98 58 0.71 1.16 163.38 0.01 6.19 1.47 1.85 125.85 0.9 13.3
1998-99 22 3.11 6.09 195.82 0.01 22.04 4.29 9.59 223.54 0.9 41.71
1999-00 56 30.12 35.68 118.46 0.01 180.37 44.33 58.97 133.02 1 283.5
2000-01 115 2 3.58 179 0.11 25.43 3.95 9.06 229.36 0.92 57.93
2001-02 6 0.45 0.56 124.44 0.05 1.45 1.42 1.42 100 0.97 4.29
2002-03 6 2.38 2.83 118.91 0.18 7.93 4.85 5.21 107.64 0.99 15.06
2003-04 29 8.13 10 123 0.12 40.63 12.97 13.06 100.69 1.03 42.76
2004-05 29 19.89 21.44 107.79 0.5 70.64 22.79 20.94 91.88 1.12 80.97
2005-06 102 16.57 26.5 159.92 0.21 82.82 19.8 22.81 115.2 1.72 175.88
2006-07 85 7.47 9.56 127.98 0.17 52.76 18.28 25.08 137.2 0.95 113.93
2007-08 90 14.41 21.7 150.58 0.24 136.82 28.56 37.02 129.62 0.91 159.4
2008-09 21 6.33 11.25 155.72 0.19 44.82 4.72 7.6 161.02 1.02 32.04
Source: - Compiled from offer documents, Basis of allotment, SEBI website and Prime Database.
On the other hand, the co-efficient of variation in the subscription ratio has
been the minimum in 2004-05. Further, a high response to individual equity issues
from retail investors was found in 2005-06, when public issue by Educomp Solution
was subscribed by 211.52 times. It was managed by SBI Capital Markets and Karvy
Investors Services Ltd. Similarly, a public issue of equity by Cinevista
Communication Ltd managed by DSP Merrill Lynch was subscribed by 180.37 times
by retail investors in 1999-2000.
Annual mean subscription ratio by retail investors and by all categories of
investors has also been presented in the Chart 7.1
205
Chart 7.1
7.2.4 Merchant Bankers wise Analysis of Subscription to Public
Issues of Equity Shares
Response from the public to the equity issues managed by different merchant bankers during the period under review has been analysed in table 7.3 and 7.4. The merchant bankers for this purpose have been classified into two groups, that is, top merchant bankers who managed 20 and above equity issues and the others managing between 5 to 19 equity issues individually and jointly during the period under review.
7.2.4.1 Merchant Bankers Managing Twenty and above Equity Issues A total of 14 merchant bankers as revealed in the table 7.3 have been found to
have managed 20 and above public issues of equity issues individually and jointly with other lead merchant bankers. These merchant bankers have been found to have participated in the public issue management activities during all the twelve years of period under review.
It has been found that equity issues managed by Enam Financial Services got the highest response from the public. Mean subscription to the equity issues managed by this lead manager was 33.26 times. This was followed by Kotak Mahindra Capital Company with mean subscription level of 27.34 times from 81 equity issues managed by it individually and jointly with other lead managers. Similarly mean subscription ratio of equity issues managed by ICICI Securities Ltd. and Karvy Investor Services Ltd stood at 21.03 and 21.08 times respectively. On the other hand, 24 equity issues managed by Aryaman Financial Services Ltd. got average subscription of 1.81 times
206
only, while the 20 equity issues managed by IDBI Ltd and IDBI Capital Markets had mean subscription of 6.87 times.
The table further reveals that high variation in the public response to different
equity issues has been found in case of issues managed by Keynote Corporate
Services, Centrum Finance and IDBI Ltd and IDBI Capital Markets Ltd. Co-efficient
of variation in the subscription of issues managed by Keynote Corporate Service,
Centrum Finance and IDBI Ltd and IDBI Capital Markets stood at 242.42%, 222.24%
and 221.25% respectively. Least variation (99.28%) was found in the subscription of
equity issues managed by Enam Financial Services. On the basis of standard deviation
of subscription levels of equity issues also, a high dispersion was found in the
subscription of issues managed by Keynote Corporate Services, Allianz Securities and
Kotak Mahindra Capital Company Ltd.
The table further reveals that equity issues managed by karvy Investor Service,
Enam Financial Services and Centrum Finance Ltd found good response from retail
investors. Mean subscription of equity issues managed by these merchant bankers has
been found at 19.34, 14.75 and 13.74% times respectively. On the other hand, equity
issues managed by Aryaman Financial Services, IDBI Ltd, IDBI Capital Markets and
JM Morgan have not been responded favourably by retail investors. Aryaman
Financial Services Ltd. has been active in issue management during the initial years of
period under review, especially during 2000-01. There has been a moderate response
from retail investors to the equity issues managed by DSP Merrill Lynch, ICICI
Securities and IL&FS Investsmart etc.
High degree of standard deviation and co-efficient of variation has been found
in the retail investors’ subscription of the issues managed by DSP Merrill, SBI Capital
Markets and Centrum Finance Ltd. It shows the high variation in the response from
retail investors to different public issues managed by these merchant bankers.
207
Table 7.3 Subscription Ratio of Equity Public Issues Managed by Different Merchant Bankers
(Merchant Bankers Managing 20 and Above Equity Issues)
S. No. Merchant Bankers No. of issues
Retail Investor All Categories of Investors Mean S.D. Co-efficient
of variation (%)
Min. Max. Mean S.D.
Co-efficient of variation
(%)
Min. Max.
1. Enam financial Services. 86 14.75 18.8 127.45 0.13 90.76 33.26 33.02 99.28 0.99 131.8 2. Kotak Mahindra Capital Co. 81 10.47 15.13 144.51 0.19 80.32 27.34 33.07 120.95 1.48 115.32 3. SBI Capital Markets. 68 12.57 28.54 227.04 0.18 211.52 17.49 26.86 153.57 0.9 115.32 4. J.M. Morgan Stanley. 68 7.79 10.47 134.4 0.02 50.76 20.36 27.47 134.92 0.99 131.8 5 ICICI Securities. 62 9.71 12.31 126.77 0.01 45.72 21.03 24.77 117.78 0.9 115.32 6 DSP Merrill Lynch. 58 8.89 23.82 267.94 0.21 180.37 20.45 26.38 128.99 1.44 115.32 7. Karvy Investors. 41 19.34 35.15 181.74 0.44 211.52 21.08 25.58 121.34 0.9 114.11 8. UTI Securities Exchange 37 12.91 16.45 127.42 0.18 83.96 14.39 17.87 124.18 0.91 83.96 9. Keynote Corporate. 27 13.1 23.83 181.91 0.61 106.02 14.71 35.66 242.42 0.99 173.75
10. Aryaman Financial. 24 1.5 4.29 286 0.21 21.5 1.81 3.02 166.85 0.93 15.9 11. IL&FS Investsmart 20 9.74 9.75 100.1 0.22 34.74 16.43 16.95 103.16 1.45 54.85 12. IDBI, IDBI Capital Markets 20 4.85 9.28 191.34 0.01 36.69 6.87 15.2 221.25 0.9 61.49 13. Allianz Securities 20 12.07 20.66 171.68 1.05 81.92 17.96 38.88 216.48 0.95 175.88 14. Centrum Finance 20 13.74 30.15 219.43 0.49 136.82 14.61 32.47 222.24 0.98 145.57 Note: - No. of issues refers to the public issues of equity managed by respective lead merchant banker individually and jointly with other lead
managers. Source: - Compiled from offer documents, Basis of allotment, SEBI website and Prime Database.
208
Chart 7.2 also shows the mean subscription ratio of equity issues managed by
different merchant bankers (managing 20 and above equity issues) during the period
under review.
Chart 7.2
7.2.4.2 Merchant Bankers Managing 5 to 19 Equity Issues
Small sized merchant bankers, who occasionally participated in the services of
public issue management has been shown in table 7.4 A good public response to the
equity issues managed by UBS Securities, Citigroup Global, Systematic Global
Edelweiss Capital and SWIFS Capital Markets has been found from the analysis of
mean subscription ratio of all categories of investors.. Average subscription ratio for
the equity issues managed by these merchant bankers stood at 68.55, 44.68, 33.32,
26.59 and 25.47 times respectively. However, UBS Securities participated as lead
manager only during 2007-08 when primary market witnessed boom conditions and
public response to equity issues was highly favourable.
On the other hand, the equity issues managed by Financial and Management
Services, Ashika Credit, BOB Capital Markets and SREI Capital Markets could not
find much favour from the investors. Equity issues managed by Financial &
Management Services could secure subscription of only 1.2 times while the average
subscription to 9 equity issues managed by BOB Capital Markets stood at 7.11 times.
Financial & Management Services Ltd. participated in the initial years of study period
only when primary market was in depression.
209
Table 7.4 Subscription Ratio of Public Issue of Equity Shares Managed by Different Merchant Bankers
(Merchant Bankers Managing 5 to 20 Equity Issues)
S. No. Merchant Bankers No. of issues
Retail Investors All Categories of Investors
Mean S.D. Co-efficient of variation
Min. Max. Mean S.D. Co-efficient of variation Min. Max.
1 Citigroup Global 17 11.85 21.04 177.55 0.21 90.56 44.68 41.42 92.7 3.1 159.4 2 Anand Rathi Securities. 16 11.73 15.88 135.38 0.62 58.54 13.38 16.23 121.3 1.34 59.85 3 Ashika Credit. 15 2.3 4.83 210 0.24 19.52 3.31 7.63 222.36 0.94 29.87 4 Edelweiss Capital 13 12.94 10.69 82.61 0.13 30.42 26.59 18.54 69.72 1.05 57.51
5. Fedex Securities. 12 8.97 25.11 279.93 0.19 88.14 23.13 70.96 306.78 0.98 248.23 6. SWIFS Capital Markets 10 17.64 21.31 120.8 0.24 63.95 25.47 29.36 115.27 0.92 83.37 7. Canara Bank 09 9.51 8.46 88.96 0.13 25.43 16.21 18.42 113.63 1.00 47.72 8. Micro Securities 09 14.53 26.36 181.42 0.12 82.82 14.99 25.04 167.04 1.03 77.35 9. BOB Capital Markets. 09 6.19 7.85 126.82 0.02 18.58 7.11 8.73 122.78 1.00 22.95
10. Financial & Mgt. Services 09 0.49 0.28 57.14 0.24 1.12 1.2 0.51 42.5 1.00 2.56 11 SREI Capital Markets 09 9.6 10.07 104.9 1.00 15.51 9.07 9.59 105.51 1.06 28.29 12 Systematic Global 07 21.81 30.12 138.1 0.18 84.44 33.32 50.66 151.71 0.99 143.07 13 Nagarjuna 07 15.49 16.73 108 0.05 30.47 21.22 24.34 114 0.97 57.43 14 HSBC Securities 07 5.99 5.56 92.82 1.64 14.9 22.27 19.54 87.74 4.36 51.22 15 UBS Securities 06 21.39 21.63 101.12 0.9 50.76 68.55 47.92 69.9 3.3 131.8 16 Ind Global Corporate 05 5.34 4.78 89.51 0.9 12.6 10.79 14.85 137.62 1.09 36.76 Note: - No. of issues refers to the public issues of equity managed by respective lead merchant banker individually and jointly with other
lead managers. Source: - Compiled from offer documents, Basis of allotment, SEBI website and Prime Database.
210
A high variation has been noticed in the co-efficient of variation and standard
deviation in the subscription ratio of equity issues managed by Fedex Securities,
Ashika Credit and Micro Securities. On the other hand, subscription to equity issues
managed by Financial & Management Services, UBS Securities, Citigroup Global,
HSBC Securities & Capital Markets and Anand Rathi Securities has been found to be
more consistent as shown by low co-efficient of variation and standard deviation.
The table further shows the response from Retail Investors to the equity issues
managed by different merchant bankers. A high mean subscription (signifying good
response from retail investors) has been found in case of issues managed by
Systematic Global (21.81times), UBS Securities (21.39%), SWIFS Capital Markets
(17.64 times) and Nagarjuna (15.49 times). The merchant bankers with low retail
investors’ response to their equity issues again included Financial & Management
Services (0.49 times), Ashika Credit (2.30 times) Ind Global (5.34 times) and HSBC
Securities & Capital Markets (5.99 times).
With respect to retail investors’ response also, a high co-efficient of variation
has been found in the subscription to equity issues managed by Fedex Securites (
279.93%), Ashika Credit (210%), Micro Securities (181.42%) and Citigroup Global
(177.55 %). A more consistency in subscription ratio by retail investors was found in
the equity issues managed by UBS Securities, SREI Capital, Nagarjuna, HSBC
Securities & Capital and Ind Global. Co-efficient of variation in subscription to public
issue of equity shares managed by these merchant bankers stood at 101.12%, 104.9%,
108%, 92.82%and 89.51% respectively.
Mean subscription ratio of equity issues managed by different merchant
bankers (managing less than 20 equity issues) during the period under review has also
been highlighted in chart 7.3
211
Chart 7.3
7.3 Public Issues of Equity with Highest Subscription
Year wise highest oversubscription to the public issues of equity during the
period of study has been depicted in table 7.5. A small size issue of Sankhya Infotech
Ltd. managed by Canara Bank was oversubscribed by 283.50 times in 1999-2000.
Similarly another IT company, FCS Software Solutions Ltd. got favourable response
from the investors and its equity issue was subscribed by 175.88 times. The equity
issue of Sobha Developers (Real Estate Company) was also subscribed by 113.93
times in 2006-07 while the equity issue by Religare Enterprise Ltd got 159.40 times
subscription from investors in 2007-08.
Table further shows the comparatively low response to the public issues from
the investors in 1997-98, 2001-02 and 2002-03. Highest subscription in 2001-02 was
only 4.29 times to the maiden public issue of Rs. 164.49 crore by Punjab National
Bank. Similarly in 1997-98, the IPO of another public sector bank, Corporation Bank
was oversubscribed by 13.30 times which was the highest subscription during the
year. In 2008-09, the highest subscription ratio (32.04 times) was found in the equity
issue by Avon Weighing Systems Ltd which was lead managed by Keynote Corporate
Services.
Highly oversubscribed equity issues also got maximum response from the
retail investors as well. The issue of Sankhya Infotech Ltd. was found to have been
subscribed by 92.15 times by retail investors. This was followed by 81.92 times over
subscription to the public issue made by FCS Software Solution Ltd. in 2005-06.
212
Table 7.5
Public Issues of Equity Shares with Highest Total Subscription
Year Issuer Company Issue Date Issue Size
( Rs. in crore)
Over Subscription
(No. of times) Retail
Investors
Over subscription (No. of times) All Investors
Lead Manager(s)
1997-98 Corporation Bank Oct. 03, 1997
304.00 6.19 3.30 ICICI Sec., IDBI Bank, SBI Caps, DSP Merrill, Kotak Mahindra, JM Financial.
1998-99 KPIT Systems Ltd. Feb. 02, 1999
11.61 22.04 41.71 Enam Securities.
1999-00 Sankhya Infotech Ltd.
March 23-27, 2000
1.67 92.15 283.50 Canara Bank
2000-01 Vantel TechnologiesLtd.
April 06-09, 2000
1.57 15.37 57.93 Karvy Investors, Ask Raymond
2001-02 Punjab National Bank
March 21-28,2002
164.49 1.45 4.29 ICICI Securities, SBI Caps, DSP Merrill, Kotak Mahindra
2002-03 Divi Laboratories Feb. 17-21,2003
44.86 7.93 15.06 IL&FS Investsmart, Kotak Manindra
2003-04 Power Trading Corporation
March 01-08 , 2004
93.60 40.63 42.76 SBI Caps, Enam Securities
2004-05 Spanco Telesystem Ltd.
Nov. 01-08, 2004
7.53 66.97 80.97 Keynote Corporate Services
2005-06 FCS Software Solutions Ltd.
Aug. 22-26, 2005
17.50 81.92 175.88 Allianz Securities
2006-07 Sobha Developers Ltd.
Nov. 23-27, 2006
569.17 20.48 113.93 Kotak Mahindra, Enam Securities
2007-08 Religare Enterprise Ltd.
Oct.19- Nov. 1, 2007
140.16 90.76 159.40 Enam Securities Citigroup Global.
2008-09 Avon Weighing System Ltd.
June 9-12, 2008
9.83 44.82 32.04 Keynote Corporate Services.
Source: - Compiled from offer documents, Basis of Allotment.
Retail investors’ poor interest was found in the public issues made by public
sector banks at different points of time. Punjab National Bank and Corporation Bank,
although the highest subscribed equity issues in different years, got 1.45 and 6.19
times subscription respectively from retail investors in 2001-02 and 1997-98. Kotak
Mahindra Capital Company and Enam Securities, as lead managers, were found to
have participated in four highest subscribed public issues of equity each. This was
followed by SBI Capital Markets Ltd in the management of three highest subscribed
equity issues. Four of the twelve of these equity issues were managed by individual
lead managers while eight issuers appointed multiple lead merchant bankers to
manage these issues.
213
Comparatively small issue size of highly subscribed equity shares during the
period under review signifies that the investors prefer small sized issues over the
issues with larger size.
7.4 Under subscription of Public Issues of Equity As per provisions and directives of SEBI, if public issue of equity shares fails
to get 90% of the total issue amount, the issue is withdrawn and entire application
money has to be refunded. Table 7.6 shows the details of equity issues withdrawn due
to lack of investors’ response during the period under review.
The table shows that application money of five public issues of equity have to
be refunded in 2000-01 as the issuers companies could not get 90% subscription.
These issuer companies had not opted for underwriting of these issues. In addition to
this, two book building issues of SIP Technologies and Creative Eyes Ltd. had to be
withdrawn after launch due to poor response from public. Later on, Creative Eye Ltd.
re launched its issue with a lower price band. In 2003-04 also, one issue by Weal
Infotech has to refund the application money for the above stated reason.
Although investors responded favourably for the public issues of equity shares
in
2006-07, but eight equity issues have to be withdrawn due to lack of minimum
subscription. Out of these issues, three were floated in June 2006 and two issues in
March 2007. Depressed secondary market conditions were mainly responsible for
withdrawal of these public issues. Similarly, four issues were withdrawn/ refunded in
2007-08 due to poor response from the investors. Bearish secondary market in the
beginning of the year 2008 forced Wockhardt Hospitals Ltd, Emaar MGF Land Ltd
and SVEC Constructions Ltd to withdraw their equity issues from the market.
During the particular month or one month before the floatation of particular
equity issues to the public, a negative variation was found in BSE Sensex and NSE
Nifty index. For example, In May 2006 and February 2007, the percentage variation
in BSE Sensex has been -13.65% and -8.18% respectively. NSE Nifty varied between
-13.68% and -8.26% for the same period.
Most of the equity issues withdrawn for want of minimum subscription were
of medium size.The size of equity issues withdrawn ranged from Rs. 4.70 crore (Ador
Powerton & Geekay Imaging Ltd. each) to 74.77 crores of Minar International Ltd.
214
Table 7.6 Under Subscription of Public Issues of Equity Shares
Year Issuer Company Date of Issue Issue Size (Rs. crores)
Lead Merchant Banker(s)
2000-01 Arraycom (India) Ltd. May 9-15,2000 58.50 SBI Capital Markets Oceana Software
Solutions Aug. 10-14, 2000 10.00 Systematix Corp.
Services Geekay Imaging Ltd. Sep. 25-27, 2000 4.70 SBI Capital Markets,
Canara bank Ador Powertron Ltd. Jan. 29- Feb.02,
2001 4.70 Brescon Corporates
Globsyn Technologies Ltd.
Feb. 13-20, 2001 21.83 Karvy Investors, UTI Securities.
2003-04 Weal Infotech Ltd. October, 2003 13.90 Aryaman Financial Services
2006-07 Blueplast Industries June 5-9, 2006 32.50 Allianz Securities Vigneshwara Exports June 7-13, 2006 57.60 Karvy Investors. Shirdi Industries Ltd. June 29- July 5,
2006 44.85 Allianz Securities.
Minar International Ltd.
Sep.25-29, 2006 74.77 Keynote Corporate.
Yogindera Worsted Ltd.
Jan.16-22, 2007 14.40 Khandwala Securities.
Tubeknit Fashions Ltd.
Feb.21- March 2, 2007
42.75 Systematix Corporate Services
Vimal Oil & Foods March 14-23, 2007 29.00 Centrum Finance. Ammana Bio Pharma. March 28 – April
5, 2007 20.16 Centrum Finance
2007-08 IT People (India) Ltd. August 27-31, 2007
45.25 Khandwala Securities Religare Securities.
Wockhardt Hospitals Ltd.
January, 31, 2008 702.44 Citigroup Global, Kotak Mahindra
Emaar MGF land Ltd. Feb. 1-6, 2008 5436.24 Citigroup, Enam, DSP Merrill, Goldman Sach, HSBC Sec., JP Morgan, Kotak Mahindra
SVEC Constructions Ltd.
February 4-8, 2008
34.00 Karvy Investors. Centrum Capital.
Source:-Compiled from offer documents, Prime Database, NSE website and SEBI website.
Most of the equity issues withdrawn during the period under review were
generally managed by single lead merchant banker for each issue with the exception
of Geekay Imaging Ltd. and Globsyn Technologies Ltd in 2000-01. However, the
public issues of equity refunded during 2007-08 were all managed by multiple lead
215
merchant bankers. However, no public issue of equity was withdrawn due to lack of
minimum subscription for the remaining period.
In addition to the withdrawn issues of equity shown in the table, six public
issues of equity shares were cancelled by SEBI or withdrawn by the lead managers or
promoters on or before the opening of the subscription list during 1997-98. These
equity issues included:
S.No. Company Issues Rs. (Rs. in Crore)
1. Charishma Overseas Ltd. 7.10
2. Highways Users’ Centres (India) Ltd. 7.00
3. Orissa Securities Ltd. 0.27
4. Seer Finance Ltd. 3.25
5. Supreme Impex Ltd, 0.20
6. Tenashu Electronics & Tele Tech. Ltd. 0.855
Of these six companies, two (Orissa Securities and Supreme Impex) again
entered the primary market and got 1.03 times and 1.06 times subscription from the
public.
7.5 Response to Public Issues of Debt Corporate debt market is an important segment of capital market in any
economy. It provides an option to investors for diversification of risk. During the
period under study, corporate debt market was dominated by bond issues and many
innovations have been witnessed in the corporate bond issues over the years.
Primary corporate debt market, during the period under study, has been
dominated by domestic non banking companies and a very small amount of funds
have been raised by manufacturing and other service industries. Two domestic
financial institutions, ICICI Ltd and IDBI Ltd, have been the major fund raising
institutions through bond issues of various types.
Table 7.7 presents the amount offered through bonds by ICICI Ltd and IDBI
Ltd along with Green Shoe offer. The table also shows the annual amount subscribed
by the public and thus the extent of subscription by investors.
216
Table 7.7
Response to Public Issues of Debt Instruments (Rs. in crore)
Year ICICI Ltd./ ICICI Bank Ltd. The IDBI Ltd. Amount Offered
Rs.
Green Shoe Offer Rs.
Amount Subscribed
Rs.
Subscription Ratio
Amount Offered
Rs.
Green Shoe Offer Rs.
Amount Subscribed
Rs.
Subscription Ratio
1997-98 650 650 919.51 1.41 750 750 984.86 1.31 1998-99 2200 2200 3064.34 1.39 2250 2250 4342.37 1.93 1999-00 2100 2100 2574.88 1.23 1050 1050 2073 1.97 2000-01 2050 2050 2978.09 1.45 600 600 1160 1.93 2001-02 4200 4200 4017.61 0.96 750 750 972 1.3 2002-03 1200 1200 2342.67 1.95 1400 1400 2350.45 1.46 2003-04 800 800 1352.12 1.69 1200 1200 2971.46 2.47 2004-05 1350 1350 1627.42 1.21 800 800 2467.43 3.08 2005-06 Nil Nil - - Nil Nil - - 2006-07 Nil Nil - - Nil Nil - - 2007-08 500 500 1,000 1.67 - - - - 2008-09 - - - - - - - -
Total 15,050 15,050 19,876.64 1.32 8,800 8,800 17,321.57 1.97 Source: - Compiled from offer documents, Basis of Allotment, Prime Database, SEBI
website and NSE website.
Chart 7.4
As shown in the table 7.7 and chart 7.4, ICICI Ltd offered an aggregate
amount of Rs. 15,050 crore through 42 issues of bonds with an equal amount to be
retained in case of over subscription (Green Shoe Option) during the period from
1997-98 to 2008-09. However, the total amount subscribed by the investors stood at
217
Rs. 19,876.64 crore resulting in the subscription ratio of 1.32 times. Thus, it could not
avail the green shoe option to the full extent.
Year wise break up of amount offered, amount subscribed and subscription
ratio of public issues of debt by ICICI Ltd. shows the poor response by investors in
the year 2001-02, when subscription ratio has been only 0.96 times. During this year,
the highest amount of Rs. 4,200 crores was offered to the public by ICICI Ltd through
bonds. However, investors subscribed 1.95 times to the bonds offerings of Rs. 1200
crores during 2002-03. This was followed by 1.41 times subscription to Rs. 1,350
crores bonds offer during 2004-05. Similarly, in 2007-08, Regular Income Bonds of
Rs. 500 crore with a green shoe option was made to investors. The Green shoe option
in this year was fully availed.
IDBI Limited, on the other hand, offered an aggregate amount of Rs. 8,800
crore to the public. An equal amount was offered through green shoe option. It was
able to raise a total amount of Rs. 17321.57 crore through 21 bond issues with an
aggregate subscription of 1.97 times. It has been shown in the table that IDBI Ltd
nearly availed the green shoe option in the years 1998-99, 1999-2000 and 2000-01.
The subscription ratio in these years was 1.93, 1.97 and 1.93 times of amount offered.
It has been the highest (3.08 times) during 2004-05 followed by 2.47 times in 2003-
04.
Comparison of public response to the debt issues by ICICI Ltd. and IDBI Ltd.
shows the comparatively good response to the bonds issues by IDBI Ltd. in all the
years except 1997-98 and 2002-03. This has also been clear from the chart 6.4
showing comparison of subscription ratio of bond issues by ICICI Ltd and IDBI Ltd.
An analysis of offer documents of bond issues by ICICI Ltd and IDBI Ltd.
shows that both these institutions filed an umbrella draft prospectus with SEBI for
public issue of bonds annually for an aggregate amount. That amount has been raised
through a number of tranches within the stipulated period of 365 days from SEBI’s
observation letter.
The issuer company had been given the option to retain any amount
oversubscribed in a particular tranche within the limits of annual aggregate amount of
bond issues approved by the SEBI.
In addition to ICICI Bonds and IDBI Bonds, other small companies who
raised funds through debt issues included Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation Ltd. in
1997-98 (Rs. 25 crore) and Krishna Bhagya Jala Nigam in 2001-02 (Rs. 350 crore).
218
Bonds issue by Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation Ltd got poor response from the
investors with subscription of only 0.25 times. It was managed by IF&FS Investsmart
Securities Ltd. and SBI Capital Markets. However, bonds issues by Krishna Bhagya
Jala Nigam got good response from investors and its bonds were subscribed by 1.80
times of amount offered. This issue was managed by SBI Capital markets Ltd.
A large size debt issue for Rs. 500 crore with green shoe option of Rs. 1,000
crore was made to investors by Tata Capital Limited in 2008-09. However,
subscription for Rs. 2,300 crore was made by investors resulting into 1.53 times
oversubscription. Two foreign based merchant bankers, Citigroup Global, DSP
Merrill and ICICI Securities were the lead managers for this debt issue.
Conclusion As a part of pre issue obligations of lead merchant banker, marketing and
distribution of public issues of securities is a major function of merchant bankers. The
success of public issue depends upon the effective marketing strategy followed by
lead merchant banker and the public response to the securities thereafter. The
obligations of lead merchant bankers with respect to marketing of public issues start
from deciding the time of floatation of issues.
For the protection of interest of investors, SEBI is striving hard for an efficient
and developed capital market. SEBI has made elaborate provisions and Guidelines
for advertisement for issue of securities to the public. Subscription of shares by the
investors is the result of hard work put by the lead manager and the issuing company.
Good public response to the issues enhances the reputation of both lead merchant
banker and the issuing company.
During the period under review, several ups and downs with respect to
response to new issue market of equity and debt has been noticed. Low public
response to new issue market has been found during the first half of period of study.
However, in the second part, a good public response has been noticed in the form of
higher mean subscription ratio both by retail investors and non retail investors. It has
been noted that new issue market generally swings with the secondary market
conditions.
An analysis of subscription ratio of public issue of equity managed by
different merchant bankers lead to the conclusion that the public issues of equity
managed by leading merchant bankers got more favourable response from investors.