e-waste: the unintended consequence of our digital revolution · • only flame retardant limit for...
TRANSCRIPT
1
E-waste: the Unintended Consequence of our Digital Revolution
Miriam Diamond, University of Toronto
Linh Nguyen1, Victoria Arrandale2,1, Liisa Jantunen3,1, Marta Venier4, Will Stubbings4,
Lisa Melymuk5
1. University of Toronto2. Occupational Cancer Research Centre & Dalla Lana
3. Environment & Climate Change Canada4. Indiana University
5. RECETOX, Masaryk University
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/03/14/about-a-quarter-of-americans-report-going-online-almost-constantly/
3
Twenge J 2017. iGen. Why today’s super-connected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy-and completely unprepared for adulthood.http://d1hbl61hovme3a.cloudfront.net/igen-appendix.pdf
PropositionE-waste is a major unintended consequence of the digital revolution and e-waste workers are vulnerable to those consequences; We are predisposed to adopt new technologies, and externalize the negative impacts.
5
Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police, data from Canadian Motor Vehicle Traffic Collision Statustics, 2016https://www.cacp.ca/index.html?asst_id=1626
Canada in 2016:- 1,898 motor vehicle fatalities (2% increase from 2015, 5.2 per 100,000 population)- 10,322 serious injuries (4% decrease from 2015)- 72,039 impaired driving incidents (201 per
100,000)
Outline
1. How much?
2. How is it handled?
3. Results from our studies
4. Solutions?
6Photo courtesy Iryna Labunska, Greenpeace, UK
Outline
1. How much? – highly uncertain
2. How is it handled?
3. Results from our Ontario study
4. Solutions?
7
Photo courtesy Iryna Labunska, Greenpeace, UK
In-use Leaving 1st Life
Abbasi, G. 2015. Story of Brominated Flame Retardants: Substance Flow Analysis of PBDEs from Use to Waste. PhD Thesis, Dept of Geography, University of Toronto.
8
• 60 million tonnes from 1970-2014
• 35 million tonnes 1970-2014• 2nd use (reuse), storage,
landfill, recycling
Global E-Waste Generation in 2014
Numbers under bars for: Lamps, small IT, screens, temp exchange eq., large equipment, small equipment
Baldé et al. 2015. The global e-waste monitor – 2014. United Nations University, IAS-SCYCLE, Bonn, Germany. 9
8.5 kg/inh for digital devices
E-Waste: How Much?
41.8 million tonnes globally in 2014 (Baldé et al. 2015)
400 million tonnes human biomass (Vaclav Smil)
https://pubs.acs.org/cen/news/88/i09/8809news2.htmlhttp://i.imgur.com/etPtdcl.jpg
10
Where does e-waste go?
11Baldé et al. 2015. The global e-waste monitor – 2014. United Nations University, IAS-SCYCLE, Bonn, Germany.
~12% in Canada & US for formal recycling
Photo’s courtesy Labréche & Gravel
75,702 tonnes collected in Ontario in 2012The WEEE Report. Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Reuse and Recycling in Canada – 2013. CM Consulting, Peterborough, Ontario
71,300 tonnes processed in Canada in 2015(Statistics Canada, 2016)
12
Basel Action Network: 205 GPS trackers on US e-waste, 2016http://wiki.ban.org/images/1/12/ScamRecyclingReport-web.pdf 13
2018: China’s “National Sword” prohibits importing almost all forms of scrap, including e-scrap
14https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/india-it-electronic-waste
Bangalore: 20,000 tonnes e-waste annually, rising at 20% per year
Outline
1. How much?
2. How is it handled?
3. Results from our Ontario study
4. Solutions?
15
Photo courtesy Iryna Labunska, Greenpeace, UK
Outline
1. How much?
2. How is it handled?
3. Results from our Ontario study• Flame retardants
4. Solutions?
22
Courtesy Iryna Labunska, Greenpeace, UK
Flame retardants
• Chemicals added to materials to meet flammability std’s
• Added to e-devices with a plug, battery or chip
23http://flameretardants.americanchemistry.com/Electrical-Electronic-Equipment/Flame-Retardants-Fire-Safety-Tools-for-Electronics.pdfhttps://toronto.citynews.ca/video/2018/08/02/updating-sidewalk-labs-latest-quayside-plans/
Diamond et al. 2015. Exploring the planetary boundary for chemical pollution. Environment International 78:8-15.
20042000
PENTA and OCTA Voluntary
agreement to stop productionin US 2004
< 1970
BFRs added consumer products
Detection of PBDEs in
breast milk
PENTA and OCTA ban on
production & new uses in US
2008
2008 2011 2012onwards
DECA proposed banned in
Canada 2013;Final PBDE reg
2017
What’s replacing
them?
PENTA & OCTA new uses banned in Canada 2009
24
Flame Retardants Restrictions
2014
TCEP restricted in Canada
2014
TCPP proposed restricted in Canada 2018
47 FRs in Ontario
E-waste dust
Reasons for the Restrictions?
• PBDEs• Endocrine disruption through the thyroid system• Neurobehavioural effects, decrease IQ (National Academies of Science 2017)
• Cryptorchidism (Goodyer et al. 2017)
• Organophosphate esters• Reproductive impairment (Carignan et al. 2017, 2018, Meeker et al. 2013)
• Developmental toxicity (decreased IQ, working memory) (Castorina et al. 2017)
• Papillary thyroid cancer (Hoffman et al. 2017)
25
Sampling Strategy
• February 2017• Five sampling days over two weeks• 24 hour samples, with equipment deployed in the early mornings
(prior to day shift)• Facility operated 16 hours per day (2 shifts)• All stationary samples
27
Sampling Flame Retardants in Ontario E-Waste Facility
Co-deployed active and passive samplers at the workbenches and central work area.
Air samples
Deployed Micro-orifice Uniform Deposition Impactor (MOUDI).
Size segregated air samples
28
Collected dust from floor, bench tops, and sorted-waste bins using defined method
(Harrad et al., 2008).
Dust samples
FRs in Dust – Canada & International Comparison
*Zheng et al., 2015. Environment International, 78, 1-7.┼Muenhor et al., 2010. Environment International, 36(7), 690-698. 29
0
20
40
60
80
100
∑4 PBDEs ∑4 NFRs ∑5 OPEsFloo
r dus
t con
cent
ratio
n (µ
g/g)
Ontario (n = 7)
China (n =14)
Thailand (n =25)
*┼
Restricted Some Restricted
FRs in Dust –Comparison of Locations in Facility
30
0
500
1000
1500
2000
∑4 PBDEs ∑4 NFRs ∑5 OPEs
Med
ian
conc
entr
atio
n (µ
g/g) Floor (n = 7)
Workbench (n = 8)Monitor bins (n = 5)Computer bins (n = 6)Mics items (n = 7)
FRs in Air (Silicone Rubber Passive Air Samplers)
31
0.19 ng/m3
0500
100015002000250030003500
Central workplace(n=10)
Workbench(n=20)
Homes (n=49)
Air c
once
ntra
tion
(ng/
m3 ) ∑8PBDEs
∑9NFRsTDCPP
02468
101214161820
BDE 47 BDE 99 BDE 183
ng/m
3
Canada Sweden (Sjӧdin et al., 2001)
Vietnam(Tue et al., 2013)
020406080
100120140160180200
BDE 209 TCEP TCIPP TPhP
ng/m
3Canada Sweden
(Sjӧdin et al., 2001)Finland(Mäkinen et al., 2009)
Stationary Active Samplers
Comparison of Air Concentrations
32
33
Size-Segregated Air Particles (0.1-18µm)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
1* 2* 3* 4* 5* 6* 7* 8 9 10
Conc
entr
atio
n (n
g m
-3)
Stages
∑8 HFRs ∑5 OPEs
Respirable particles – 30%
PM10
Exposure Estimates for male workers (ng/kg bw/day, median values)
∑4 PBDEs ∑4 NFRs ∑5 OPEs Total 13 FRs
Inhalation 11 0.8 16 28
Dust ingestion
29 1.5 21 52
TOTAL 40 2.3 37 80
34
Exposure – Comparison with Other Estimates
35
0
50
∑5 OPEs ∑4 NFRs ∑4 Penta- and Octa- BDEs
Deca-BDE
Inha
latio
n ex
posu
re
(ng/
kg b
w/d
ay) This study, n = 20
US study (Cahill et al., 2007)
0
50
∑5 OPEs ∑4 NFRs ∑4 Penta- and Octa- BDEs
Deca-BDE
Dust
inge
stio
n (n
g/kg
bw
/day
) This study, n = 8Chinese study (Zheng et al., 2015)
Ontario Occupational Health Regulations
• Limits for lead, mercury, copper, cadmium• Only flame retardant limit for TPhP (3 mg m-3, from 1961)• Where personal protective equipment is used, must be in good
working condition
36
Concern about exposures?E-waste Estimated
Exposure, 95th
Percentile
RfD*
BDE-47 0.3 255BDE-209 72 2,300TDCiPP 58.5 24,500TCEP 11 17,900TPhP 26.4 (2.3E-5 mg m-3) 3 mg m-3
37
ng/kg bw/dayChiu W et al. 2018. Beyond the RfD…. Environ Health Perspecthttps://doi.org/10.1289/EHP3368
Outline
1. How much?
2. How is it handled?
3. Results from our Ontario study
4. Solutions?
38
Courtesy Iryna Labunska, Greenpeace, UK
Rittel, H.W.J. & Webber M.M. 1973. Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sci 4: 155-169,http://socialmarketing.blogs.com/.a/6a00d8341c595f53ef017d3bc64ca9970c-pi
Solutions for dealing with E-waste
39
Legislative ComplexityWaste Chemical
ManagementOccupationalHealth & Safety
International Basel Convention, USMCA?Import-export controls, substance content restrictions
Stockholm Convention Persistent Organic Pollutants
Federal Industry: Electronic Product Stewardship Canada; Electronic Products Recycling Association
Canadian Environmental Protection ActChemical Management Plan
Provincial Waste Diversion ActExtended producer responsibility, intra-provincial movement, licence waste treatmentOntario Electronic Stewardship
Specific regulations that don’t pertain to e-waste
Occupational Health & Safety Act
Municipal Waste management servicesLandfills, direction on recycling & disposal
Landfill bans
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-08/documents/canada_country_presentation.pdf40
http://www.basel.int/Implementation/PartnershipProgramme/PACE/Overview/tabid/3243/Default.aspxhttp://www.basel.int/Implementation/PartnershipProgramme/MPPI/Overview/tabid/3268/Default.aspx
41
Government of Canada
Federal Legislation & Regulations(CEPA 1999, CCPSA, EIHWHRMR)
Provincial Legislation & Regulations (e.g. WDA, EPA (ON), EMA (BC) )
Municipality
Municipal Bylaw
Operational Regulations(i.e. Landfill bans)
Provincial Stewardship
Program
(or individual steward)
No Government Designating
Agency ex. EMA (BC)
Implementation
Solid Waste & Hazardous waste Management
Government Designating
Agency i.e. WDO (ON)
Provincial Government
Collecting Processors (including municipalities)Refurbishing Processors
Recycling Processors
Repo
rtin
g Bac
k
Funding & Program Implementation
Electronic & Electrical Equipment Industries(Manufacturers & Retailers )
Electronic Product Stewardship Canada
(EPSC)
Electronic Product Recycling Association (EPRA)
Collaboration &Implementation
Propose Industry Std to Harmonize National Programs
Recycling Qualification O
ffice (RQ
O)
Develop and Implem
ent Guidelines
Repo
rtin
g Bac
k
Auditing Process
Electro Federation Canada (EFC)
Information Technology Association Canada (ITAC)
Setting Environmental Std
International Agreements
Negotiation &
Im
plementation
Communication
Communication
Communication
EC & HC CCME
Developing Environmental Std,
Developing EPR
Communication
Reporting Back
Reporting Back
Comm
unication
Feedback Process
Canadian E-waste Management
Implementation
Setting Environmental Std
Cons
ider
atio
nan
d ad
optio
n
Movement of Hazardous Wasteoutside of Canada
43
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/03/14/about-a-quarter-of-americans-report-going-online-almost-constantly/
44
Twenge J 2017. iGen. Why today’s super-connected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy-and completely unprepared for adulthood.http://d1hbl61hovme3a.cloudfront.net/igen-appendix.pdf
http://d1hbl61hovme3a.cloudfront.net/igen-appendix.pdf
Dramatic decline in self-liking and rise in depressive symptoms that coincide with widespread use of Smart Phones
45
Summary
• E-waste is a major unintended consequence of the digital revolution;
• We are predisposed to adopt new technologies, and to externalize the negative impacts;
• E-waste handlers are most vulnerable • to adverse impacts• Solutions ……..
46