ECSEL JU Moving Forward in 2016

Bert De Colvenaer Executive Director Torino, 22 March 2016

1

Electronic Components and Systems for European Leadership

a Public-Private Partnership

Keeping Europe at the Forefront of Technology Development

Established by the Council Regulation (EU) No 561/2014

2

Implement Horizon 2020: • Develop favourable conditions for investing in

knowledge and innovation • Achieve smart, sustainable and inclusive growth

PPP-model with 3-way funding • The European Union (1.17B€, via EC/H2020) • The ECSEL Participating States (>1.17B€) • The Private Members (~ 5B€ minus grants) • Build upon ARTEMIS/ENIAC JU experience and achievements

3

4

Executive Director Public Authorities Board Private Members Board OFFICE

Governing Board ECSEL Members

(Public Authorities, Private Members)

• Strategic orientation, supervises implementation Approves MultiAnnual Strategic Plan (MASP), Work Plan (WP), rules, membership, budget, staff, communication policy

Executive Director Programme Office

• Chief Executive, legal representation Consolidates Multi Annual Strategic Plan and Financial Perspectives, elaborates budget proposal, Work Plan, executes calls; monitors projects

Public Authorities Board European Commission,

ECSEL Participating States

• Representatives of the Public Authorities Approves call launching, call rules, allocates funding

Private Members Board AENEAS, ARTEMIS-IA, EPoSS

• Defines research agenda Elaborates the multiannual strategic research and innovation agenda (MASRIA) and the annual research and innovation activities plan (RIAP)

Union Body, Legal Personality, 4 Bodies:

5

Strategy for ECS: Without a state of the art technological

infrastructure, Europe will be dependent on importation

Without functionality provided by the embedded software, the chips are useless and the fabs are economically unsustainable

Without integrating components in smart systems, it is impossible to capture the economic benefits on the end user markets

6

► ENIAC + ARTEMIS + EPoSS = ECSEL

• Multi Annual Strategic Plan (MASP) • Work Plan (WP)

MASRIA +

RIAP

MASP

WP

Produced by the ECSEL Industry Associations ECSEL JU Office

7

Adopted by ECSEL JU Governing Board

8

... Because ELECTRONICS matters to everyone!

9

The ECSEL Strategy

Impossibile visualizzare l'immagine.

10

Page : 11

Impossibile visualizzare l'immagine.

Impossibile visualizzare l'immagine.

Impossibile visualizzare l'immagine.

Impossibile visualizzare l'immagine.

Impossibile visualizzare l'immagine.

End User Applications systems

Connectivity

Unit-level integration IC assembly and

test

WAFERS Wafer manufacturing - Processes - Materials - ...

Characterisation Qualification

MM MtM

M/NEMS Devices Libraries

...

IC design

HW Architectures

PCB design Middleware

Sensors/Actuators

System design System

modelling

Certification V&V

Packaging

Non-functional characteristics

TOOLS !

Interconnect

Impossibile visualizzare l'immagine.

Operating Systems

Security

Wireless

SOFTWARE CHIPS

12

Participation

119 proj, 4 B€ costs, 650 M€ EU, 875 M€ MS, >1K participants, 40% SMEs

Impossibile visualizzare l'immagine.

ARTEMIS/ENIAC • Only one funding rate: 15% (ENIAC),

16,7% (Artemis) regardless the type of actions or beneficiary

• JU funding supplementing National

funding

• JU funding payment dependent from NGAs signature

• Cost recognition follows national rules and national eligibility criteria (e.g. in Italy dissemination, management and travel costs are not eligible costs)

ECSEL • JU funding rates = % of H2020, tailored

to beneficiary types (LE, SME, Unif) and type of Action (IA, RIA)

• JU funding supplementing National funding

• JU funding payment pace independent

from NGAs signature

• Cost recognition follows H2020 rules and cost categories (Italian funding authority applies H2020 cost categories) 13

• ECSEL JU average success rate*: 23% (16,7% RIA, 44,2% IA)

• FP7 ARTEMIS average success rate: 26% • FP7 ENIAC average success rate: 46% * 2014-15 calls

ECSEL call 2014 • Submitted: 34 RIA, 14 IA • Retained for grant: 6 RIA, 6 IA • RIA success rate: 17,6% • IA success rate: 42,9%

ECSEL call 2015 • Submitted: 51 RIA, 11 IA • Retained for grant: 8 RIA, 5 IA • RIA success rate: 15,7% • IA success rate: 45,5%

14

15

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

call 2008 call 2009 call 2010 call 2011 call 2012 call 2013 call 2014 call 2015 call 2016Estimate

8 10

8 5

7,5

2

10

12

10

7

7,5

1 2,9

0,6

18,5

10,5

13,3

13,4

5,4

6,6

3 4,9

3,5

18,5

ARTEMIS Italian funding (Meuro) ENIAC Italian funding (M€) ECSEL Italian funding (M€)

ENIAC+ARTEMIS EU funding (M€) ECSEL EU funding (M€)

16

• 2 calls x 2 phase, in parallel • ECSEL 2016-1 (RIA) Industrial/Applied Research project TRL 3-4 • ECSEL 2016-2 (IA) Experimental development projects TRL 5-8 • “Lighthouse Initiatives” as a separate, parallel action

• Call Published: March 15th 2016 • PO deadline : May 24th 2016 • FPP deadline : September 20th 2016 • Funding decision :

Target End November 2016

17

EVALUATIONS

jan feb mar apr may jun jul aug sep oct nov dec

PO Deadline May 24

FPP Deadline

September 20

Call open March 15

ECSEL Call Forum

Brussels

ECSEL Events Date / Place

ECSEL Brokerage event 27-28/01 Strasbourg

ECSEL Call Forum 3 May, Brussels

ECSEL Stakeholders’ Forum Late October, Brussels

18

ECSEL Brokerage Strasbourg

Funding decision

ECSEL Stakeholders’

Forum

19

RIA IA

EU/ECSEL 65 M€ 85 M€

IT 18.5 M€

All MS About 160 M€

20

Type RIA IA

For profit (non SME) 25% 20% SME 30% 25%

University/Other 35% 35% EU Contribution as % of the eligible cost according to H2020 (beneficiaries may ask for a lower contribution)National contributions: see Annex of the Work Plan

21

ECSEL JU “Lighthouse Initiatives” • Build on well identified market-pull related

to societal needs, with a strong pan-European dimension

• Create ecosystems along the relevant value and supply chains, where appropriate: – Working towards clustering of projects – Having a strategic IP management policy – Establishing a standardization strategy – Addressing the relevant non-technical aspects

(legislative, regulatory, social, ...)

• Similar to the “ECSEL Consortium Building Event” – Brussels Sheraton Airport Hotel – Date: 3 May 2016

– Agenda:

• Update Call info, submission, ... • Facilitate proposal consolidation

and partner engagement

• Focus on Networking - Breakout & Poster Session

22

H2020 Participant Portal: http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/home.html Online manual for H2020: http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/docs/h2020-funding-guide/index_en.htm User guide for the submission tool: http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/support/sep_usermanual.pdf Annotated JU GA: http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/amga/h2020-amga_en.pdf For questions on any aspect of grant applications and the EU Research Framework Programmes, including beneficiary registration and data updates, please refer to the : http://ec.europa.eu/research/index.cfm?pg=enquiries For any IT-related problems that you might experience with the Submission system, please contact the : http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/api/contact/index.html Our website (specific webpage with links to documents and actualized information): http://www.ecsel.eu/ Questions specific to ECSEL:calls@ecsel.europa.eu 23

• Register your company (PIC number) • Use the portal to register your proposal

(coordinator) Proposal consists of: • Part A: consortium information including

financial information (cost, funding) • Part B: Pdf with technical description • Part C: Country specific information required

(specific for ECSEL) 24

25

25% of DC

Direct cost: Personnel

Direct cost: Subcontracting

Other direct cost Equipment, Travel Materials, etc

Indirect cost

JU Funding

x% of DC Budget according

to H2020 rules

Budget according to national rules

National Funding

• If activities with costs are funded through ESI funds, then those activities cannot obtain ECSEL JU funding.

• Various possibilities to include activities funded by ESI funds described in Guide for Applicants

• Main issue: no overlap • Risk mitigation: what happens if the activity does

not get the ESI funding? • ECSEL JU team is available to advice

26

27

Submission of Full Project Proposal

Evaluation by experts

Score of proposals (under/above threshold)

Selection in PAB, funding, synergy with EU and national policies

Admissibility and JU eligibility check

Final ranking

Communication to coordinator

Handling of change requests

PAB decision on change requests

Signature of JU GA

GAP Selection of projects

3 months 4-5 months

28

Thank you for your attention!