edad 310
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/31/2019 edad 310
1/4
Republic of the Philippines
University of Northern Philippines
Graduate SchoolTamag, Vigan City
EDAD 310 THE IMPROVEMENT OF SUPERVISION AND INSTRUCTION
LUBETH R. CABATU DR. ROSA R. DE PERALTA
Student Professor
HELPING TEACHERS EVALUATE THEMSELVES
(Evaluation of Instructional Skills)
Introduction
No aspect of teaching can be more threatening to teachers than evaluation of their performance. No aspect of
administration can be more agonizing for a conscientious administrator than evaluation of teachers.
Although teachers need to develop an attitude receptive to evaluation as a means of improving themselves and the
profession, schools need to devise ways to evaluate teachers that are feasible, fair, humane, and as objective as possible.
In this topic we will examine the complex problem of evaluation of teacher performance - that is both evaluation
of instruction and evaluation of the instructor.
WHAT IS EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTION?
Evaluation of instruction means the appraisal of the effectiveness of the instructional skills and strategies chosen
by the teacher.
Evaluation of the instruction means an assessment of the teacher's classroom performance, his/her effectiveness
in employing the skills and strategies selected and certain personal and professional attributes.
A full developed program of teacher appraisal consists of three components:
1. Summative Evaluation is the annual assessment done by the administrator not only for the purpose of
improvement of instruction but also and primarily for making decisions on re-hiring, tenure, advancement toleadership positions, and in those situations that have it, merit pay or entry and advancement on the career
ladder.
2. Formative evaluation is the ongoing assessment of teacher performance. Administrators and supervisors visit
teachers periodically, observe their classes, and confer with the teachers for purposes of helping them to
improve their instruction.
3. Self-evaluation is where the teachers make an appraisal of her/his own performance and means by which
supervisors can help them to do so.
The supervisor must possess the ability or skills necessary to encourage teachers to look at their own behavior with a
view to improving themselves.
Among the notions teachers hold about evaluation of their behaviors are the attitudes that:
1. Made them feel nervous that their administrator will discover their negative performance.
2. Fear that this will be the avenue for their superiors to get even with them by lowering their grade in their
performance
3. Made them feel excited that their administrator will discover their positive performance.
4. Made them feel good because this will be the avenue of knowing their strength and weaknesses for further
development of their performance.
Because of the antagonistic attitudes and fears of teachers toward evaluation, the supervisor's primary role in the
evaluation of teacher competence should be one of helping teachers to evaluate themselves rather than one of evaluating
teachers.
Competencies to be Evaluated
Among categories of behavior that appear on instrument that assess teacher performance are:
1. Instructional skills
2. Personal traits
3. Professional attributes
-
7/31/2019 edad 310
2/4
Examples of Teacher Evaluation Instruments
1. PAS FORM B-2(Performance Appraisal System for Teachers and Master Teachers)INSTRUCTIONAL COMPETENCE (70%)A. Lesson Planning and Delivery (45% for Teachers)
Assessment of learners, learning outcomes and lesson
Management of time and learning environment
B. Learners Achievement (20% for Teachers)C. School, Home and Community Involvement (5%)
2. 360 Feedback360 degree feedback involves an employee receiving feedback from a variety of sources, which might
include staff reporting to the position colleagues and clients. This information is used to identify strengths and
development needs..
Components of the 360 degrees Feedback
1. Achievement focus = level of initiative and motivation to achieve
goals, sound judgments and decisions, problem handling and flexibility
2. Planning and decision making
3. Resource Management
4. Performance Management and Improvement
5. Relationships
6. Managing Change
3. NCBTS (National Competency Based Teachers Standard)NCBTS is an integrated theoretical framework that defines the different dimensions of effective teaching,
where effective teaching means being able to help all types of students learn the different learning goals in the
curriculum.
Why do we need the NCBTS?
To direct teachers into a more effective teaching and learning process
Reconcile the expectations from the teachers by the public
It is composed of domains and and under each domain, there are strands and at the lowest level of the
hierarchical organization, under the strands, specific indicators are defined. These indicators are concrete,
observable, and measurable teacher behaviors, actions, habits, actions, routines, and practices know tocreate, facilitate, and support enhanced student learning.
DOMAINis a distinctive sphere of the teaching-learning process, and is also a well-defined arena fordemonstrating positive teacher practices.
STRANDSrefer to more specific dimensions of positive teacher practices under the broad conceptual
domain.
-
7/31/2019 edad 310
3/4
Domains of the NCBTS1. Social Regard for Learning
It focuses on the ideal that teachers serve as positive and powerful role models of the values of
the pursuit of learning and of the effort to learn, and that the teachers actions, statements, and
different types of social interaction with students exemplify this ideal.
2. Learning Environment.It focuses on the importance of providing for a social and physical environment within which all
students, regardless of their individual differences in learning, can engage the different learning
activities and work towards attaining high standards of learning.
3. Diversity of LearnersIt emphasizes the ideal that teachers can facilitate the learning process in diverse types of
learners, by first recognizing and respecting individual differences, then using knowledge about
students differences to design diverse sets of learning activities to ensure that all students canattain appropriate learning goals.
4. CurriculumIt refers to all elements of the teaching-learning process that work in convergence to help students
attain high standards of learning and understanding of the curricular goals and objectives. These
elements include the teachers knowledge of subject matter, teaching-learning approaches and
activities, instructional materials and learning resources.
5. Planning, Assessing and ReportingIt refers to the aligned use of assessment and planning activities to ensure that the teaching-
learning activities are maximally appropriate to the students current knowledge and learninglevels. It focuses on the use of assessment data to plan and revise teaching-learning plans, as well
as the integration of teaching-learning activities.
6. Community LinkagesIt focuses on the ideal that school activities are meaningfully linked to the experiences and
aspirations of the students in their homes and communities. It focuses on teachers effortsdirected at strengthening the links between school and community activities, particularly as these
links help in the attainment of the curricular objectives
4. QCE of the NBC No. 461Four Fold Evaluation (peer, self, student, supervisor)
Components of the 360 degrees Feedback
1. Commitment
2. Knowledge of the Subject
3. Teaching for independent learning
4. Management of Learning
APPROACHES THAT INSTITUTE TEACHER EXAMINATION OF THEIR OWN COMPETENCE
To institute teachers' examination of their own competence the supervisor may take an approach that consists of
the following three stages:
1. Examination of teacher performance in general terms, that is, analysis of the teaching act in a theoreticalcontext. This is accomplished by study of the literature and other selected media on teaching.
2. Examination of the performance of other teachers both inside and outside the school system. This is
accomplished by the use of audio and visual media and by teachers visiting each other's classrooms.3. Examination of the teacher's own performance. This is accomplished through the use of both written
materials and other selected media.
Models of Teaching
The study and recognition of models of teaching can be used by the supervisor to recognize teacher performance.
A model for teaching is a plan or pattern that can be used to shape curriculums, to design instructional materials,
and to guide instruction in the classroom and other settings.
Bruce Joyce describes twenty models of teaching grouped into four categories: social models, information-
processing models, personal models, and behavior models. Included are:
1. The teacher as lecturer.
-
7/31/2019 edad 310
4/4
2. The teacher as expert resource person. (shares information about content and sources)
3. The teacher as facilitator. (provides resources and direction to learners)
4. The teacher as counselor. (sees the personal development of the learner as more important than the content)
5. The teacher as a leader of group meetings. (serves as master of ceremonies, the chairman of the group, directs
activities, encourages participation)6. The teacher as tutor. (engages in instruction on a one-to-one basis)
7. The teacher as manager of mediated instruction (selects various media, arranges for their use, and follows up the
mediated presentations with discussion and evaluation)
8. The teacher as laboratory supervisor. (Laboratory approach to instruction - experimenting, constructing,
researching, etc.)9. The teacher as programmer. (writes specific programs which the learners work on individually or in groups - use
of computers is big)
10. The teacher as manipulator of the learning environment. (Manipulates the stimuli in the classroom environment;
gives and withholds reinforcement for specific kinds of learning that the students are attempting.)
A productive in-service program would lie in the identification and analysis of various models of teaching.
After a study of models of teaching, the supervisor may turn the external analysis of models into an internal analysis
by asking teachers to describe and classify their own models.
Suggestions for Helping School Administrators and Supervisors in Developing and Carrying out a
Program of Evaluation
1. Sharing in the goal-setting process.School administrators and supervisors assist teachers in formulating goals for instructional improvement byworking closely with them. They can help to keep goals realistic and in focus, and point out limitations and
problems that need to be faced.
2. Helping readjust goals.The modification of goals is part of the problem-solving process. Thus goals must be continuously subjected to
scrutiny and re-evaluation.
3. Promoting creative thinking and actionTeachers are to be given suitable opportunities and adequate encouragement to try something new.4. Facilitating the gathering of evidenceThis can be done by placing at the disposal of the staff appropriate means of gathering data, such as tests, records,
equipment, and personnel.
5. Finding or developing measurement techniques6. Promoting good communication
School administrator and supervisor will participate frequently with teacher groups in their common effort to
improve instruction
7. Facilitating appropriate publicationPublication of the activities involved in evaluation is one aspect of the total program. It may take such forms as
committee report, a teachers guide, or a course of study. Publication should not be viewed as the end product of
the curriculum improvement project. It is the beginning of implementation.
Summary
Evaluation is one of the conditions essential to a program of instructional improvement. It is the means by which
quality may constantly be improved. Evaluation is concerned with both process, which is the skill with which staff
members work together on instructional problems, and product, which refers to the changes in the growth and
development of children as a result of instruction.
All in all, when we as supervisors help our teachers develop the skills for self-evaluation; our jobs become that
much easier, for the teachers know themselves better than anyone else.
References:
Naval,Administration and Supervision for Philippine Schools
Gregorio, Herman C., School Administration and Supervision