effect of economic crisis on dutch collective bargaining tuesday 23 february 2010 employers...
TRANSCRIPT
Effect of economic crisis on Dutch collective bargaining
Tuesday 23 February 2010
Employers perspectiveAWVN
Laurens Harteveld
Werkt voor werkgevers
French delegation 2
Structure
1. Social dialogue2. Crisis in 20093. Recent trends
23 February 2010
1. Social dialogue in the Netherlands
Collective bargaining at central and decentral
levels
Werkt voor werkgevers
Levels of industrial relations in The Netherlands
central agreements (social dialogue)
sectoral collective agreements
company collectiveagreements
union federation
employers’ federations
unions employers’ organisations
unions employer
individual labourcontracts
employee
works council
Government
23 February 2010 4French delegation
Werkt voor werkgevers
Employers’ organisations and unions
• Unions:– FNV (General Federation of Dutch Unions)– CNV (Christian Federation of Unions)– MHP (Middle/Higher Level Employees)
• Employers:– VNO-NCW (General Federation of Dutch
Employers’ Organisations)– MKB Nederland (Small and Middle sized
Companies)– LTO (Farmers’ Organisation)
23 February 2010 5French delegation
Werkt voor werkgevers
LAURENS AWVN
CHRIS FNV
Levels of industrial relations in The Netherlands
central agreements (social dialogue)
sectoral collective agreements
company collectiveagreements
union federation
employers’ federations
unions employers’ organisations
unions employer
individual labourcontracts
employee
works council
Government
23 February 2010 6French delegation
Werkt voor werkgevers
Levels of industrial relations in The Netherlands
central agreements (social dialogue)
sectoral collective agreements
company collectiveagreements
union federation
employers’ federations
unions employers’ organisations
unions employer
individual labourcontracts
employee
works council
Government
23 February 2010 7French delegation
Werkt voor werkgevers
Bi/tripartite structure
• Social Economic Council (advisory; not binding)
• Labour Foundation (Spring/Autumn consultation; not binding)
• Balance between legislative role government and self regulation social partners (collective bargaining; social policy)
23 February 2010 8French delegation
Werkt voor werkgevers
Purposes central social dialogue
• Mutual problem recognition and solving• To create broad support for new policies• General agenda setting for collective
bargaining• Co-ordination decentral levels of industrial
relations and collective bargaining
23 February 2010 9French delegation
Werkt voor werkgevers
Levels of industrial relations in The Netherlands
central agreements (social dialogue)
sectoral collective agreements
company collectiveagreements
union federation
employers’ federations
unions employers’ organisations
unions employer
individual labourcontracts
employee
works council
Government
23 February 2010 10French delegation
Werkt voor werkgevers
Legal Framework collective bargaining:
• Collective Agreements Act 1927• Extension of Collective Agreements Act
1937
• ILO Convention 87 (freedom of association)
• ILO Convention 98 (freedom of collective bargaining)
23 February 2010 11French delegation
Werkt voor werkgevers
Coverage and union representation
83
25
17
75
collective bargaining coverage union density
23 February 2010 12French delegation
Werkt voor werkgevers
23 February 2010 French delegation
CLA’s in The Netherlands in 2009
Number of CLA’s
Number of employees
Company-level CLA’s
558 (75%) 594.500 (10%)
Branch-level CLA’s 190 (25%) 5.555.000 (90%)(855.500 by extension = 14%)
Total 748 6.149.500Source: Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment, June 2009
13
2. Crisis in 2009
Impact of the “Spring Pact” on Collective
Bargaining Processes
Werkt voor werkgevers
French delegation 15
CA-cycle 2009 in theory
Prinsjesdag 2008: Government policy 2009
and forecasts 2009
Autumn 2008: Central deal?
December 2008-October 2009:CA negotiations
September 2008: Concept federation
strategy 2009
1
2
3
4
23 February 2010
Werkt voor werkgevers
French delegation 16
CA-cycle 2009 in reality
Prinsjesdag 2008: Forecasts: 1,25% growth in 2009
Autumn Pact:Wage demand
max 3,5%
December 2008-October 2009:Declining wages 3,5% → 1%
1
2
3
4
Fall of Lehman Brothers
Spring Pact
23 February 2010
Werkt voor werkgevers
23 February 2010 French delegation 17
Spring Pact (2009)
• Wage increase approximately level of inflation (prediction 2009 = 1%)
• If more financial budget available, than:– Employment – Training – Pension
Werkt voor werkgevers
23 February 2010 French delegation 18
Practice
0,0%
0,5%
1,0%
1,5%
2,0%
2,5%
3,0%
3,5%
4,0%
o n d j f m a m j j a s o n d j
Spring Pact
Werkt voor werkgevers
23 February 2010 French delegation 19
Conclusions
Conclusions 2009 • Season with uncommon changes• Complicated / difficult but sharp turn• High level of (short term) adaptability• Negotiations not easier:
– Impact on bargaining agenda and range of possible outcomes
– Lack of sense of urgency
Werkt voor werkgevers
23 February 2010 French delegation 20
• Social Pacts are only effective if external effects are internalized by all employers and employees, …..
• Also (or especially) employers and employees who are not (yet and/or fully) affected by the crisis.
3. Recent trends in 2010
Werkt voor werkgevers
French delegation 22
CA-cycle 2010
Prinsjesdag 2009: Government policy 2010
and forecasts 2010
Autumn 2009: Central deal?
December 2009-October 2010:CA negotiations
September 2009: Concept federation
strategy 2010
1
2
3
4
23 February 2010
Context season 2010: crisis 2009
2009: Largest economic decline (-4%) in 110 years
1,50
7,506,50
1,25 1,25
-0,75
2,00
5,50
6,50
1,50 1,50
-0,50
-4,70-6%
-4%
-2%
%
2%
4%
6%
8%
Growth World trade Unemployed Wages Inflation Purchasing power
EMU-balance
2008 2009 2010 estimation 2010 estimation
-6,1
Werkt voor werkgevers
French delegation 24
CA-cycle 2010
Prinsjesdag 2009: Government policy 2010
and forecasts 2010
Autumn 2009: Central deal?
December 2009-October 2010:CA negotiations
September 2009: Concept federation
strategy 2010
1
2
3
4
23 February 2010
Werkt voor werkgevers
French delegation 25
Government policy 2010
Postponed (but inevitable and necessary) cuts:• Protect households at the expense of higher
government deficit• Modest investments in 2010• Studying on future measures to reduce
government debt €35 billion (20 commissions)
• If growth in 2011 then start cuts
23 February 2010
Werkt voor werkgevers
French delegation 26
CA-cycle 2010
Prinsjesdag 2009: Government policy 2010
and forecasts 2010
Autumn 2009: Central deal?
December 2009-October 2010:CA negotiations
September 2009: Federation
strategy 2010
1
2
3
4
23 February 2010
Werkt voor werkgevers
French delegation 27
Federation strategy 2010
FNV: • Maintain purchaging power in 2010• Wage demand of 1,25% + work deals, else
2%
AWVN:• Short term: recession• Long term: labour market shortage
Strategy 2010
23 February 2010
Werkt voor werkgevers
French delegation 28
I. Sustainable employability Healthy employees
II. Flexibility
Healthy organisation
III. Sustainable wage costs
AWVN strategy 2010
23 February 2010
Werkt voor werkgevers
French delegation 29
Healthy
emplo-yees
I. Sustainable employability
Inter-nal
- Education- Health policy- Life cycle policy
Exter-nal
- Diversity
Healthy
organi-sation
II. Flexibility (19%)- Flexible working patterns /mobility- More productive hours
III. Sustainable wage costs- Sustainable wage costs- Incidental instead of structural increase- Sustainable solutions pension funds
23 February 2010
Werkt voor werkgevers
French delegation 30
CA-cycle 2010
Prinsjesdag 2009: Government policy 2010
and forecasts 2010
December 2009-October 2010:CA negotiations
1
2
3
4
No Autumn Summit
September 2009: Federation
strategy 2010
Last Saturday: Dutch government falls
23 February 2010
Werkt voor werkgevers
French delegation 31
CA-cycle 2010
Prinsjesdag 2009: Government policy 2010
and forecasts 2010
Results February 2010CA negotiations
1
2
3
4
September 2009: Federation
strategy 2010
No Autumn Summit
23 February 2010
Werkt voor werkgevers
French delegation 32
Agreements made so far
0,0%
0,5%
1,0%
1,5%
2,0%
nov-09 dec-09 jan-10 feb-10 mrt-10
Contractcatering ICK
Politie
PhilipsKleinmetaal
Verzekerings-bedrijf
Metalektro
DSM
TNT
MBO
BOVAG
Dagblad-journalisten
23 February 2010
Werkt voor werkgevers
French delegation 33
• Some zero contracts in 2010: ING (1% per 1-9-11), Education, Dagbladjournalisten
• Time instead of wage: Metal sector, V&D/La Place (no increase in 2010 and 1 extra day off)
• Conditional increase: Flex-agencies• Other: temporarily no premium social fund
(Motors and bikes enterprises)
Agreements made so far
23 February 2010
Werkt voor werkgevers
French delegation 34
Examples of employability:• Metal sector I: more course positions for 16-
and 17 aged. Maintaining professionals.• ING: Taskforce employability• IKEA: extra attention for course positions
and job rotation• Metal sector II: €30 mln. extra for education• Philips: 2 extra educational days per year
Agreements made so far
23 February 2010
Werkt voor werkgevers
French delegation 35
First impressions 2010:• Central level:
– Divided union– Fallen government
• Decentral level:– Few agreements so far– Too much focus on wages– Coordination by unions?
Conclusions
23 February 2010
Werkt voor werkgevers
French delegation 36
Questions?
23 February 2010
Werkt voor werkgevers
French delegation 37
Merci!
23 February 2010