effective use of research & publication tools and resources – part 2

8/11/2019 Effective Use of Research & Publication Tools and Resources Part 2

1/188


2/188


3/188


4/188


5/188


6/188


7/188


8/188


9/188


10/188


11/188


12/188


13/188


14/188


15/188


16/188


17/188


18/188


19/188


20/188


21/188


22/188


23/188


24/188


25/188


26/188


27/188


28/188


29/188


30/188


31/188


32/188


33/188


34/188


35/188


36/188


37/188


38/188


39/188


40/188


41/188


42/188


43/188


44/188


45/188


46/188


47/188


48/188


49/188


50/188


51/188


52/188


53/188


54/188


55/188


56/188


57/188


58/188


59/188


60/188


61/188


62/188


63/188


64/188


65/188


66/188


67/188


68/188


69/188


70/188


71/188


72/188


73/188


74/188


75/188


76/188


77/188


78/188


79/188


80/188


81/188


82/188


83/188


84/188

Abstract Abstract should not exceed 300 words ( without reference).Abstract must include following sections:Problem Statement: This section should include answers of the questions:

Why was research needed?. What was the context of the work?. Introduce the problem or provide background for what you will address .

Approach: What did you do and how did you go about solving or making progress on the problem. Describe the method of research, study, or analysis applied to the problem.

Results: What results did you get? State what you found and relate it to the problem. Summarize the major results in numbers, avoid vague, hand waving results such as verysmall or significant.

Conclusions/Recommendations: What are the implications of your answer? State the relevance, implications, or significance of the results or conclusions, to thebusiness. Significance of work is often implied by the recommendations or implications for futurework.

Effective Use of Research & Publication Tools andResources 2014 By: Nader Ale Ebrahim
http://msc.emeraldinsight.com/Authors/guidelines_page_5.htmlhttp://msc.emeraldinsight.com/Authors/guidelines_page_5.html


85/188

A Structured Abstract


Purpose of this paper What are the reason(s) for writing the paper or the aims of the research?

Design/methodology/approach

How are the objectives achieved? Include the main method(s) used for theresearch. What is the approach to the topic and what is the theoretical orsubject scope of the paper?

FindingsWhat was found in the course of the work? This will refer to analysis,discussion, or results.

Researchlimitations/implications (ifapplicable)

If research is reported on in the paper this section must be completed andshould include suggestions for future research and any identifiedlimitations in the research process.

Practical implications(if applicable)

What outcomes and implications for practice, applications andconsequences are identified? Not all papers will have practical implicationsbut most will. What changes to practice should be made as a result of thisresearch/paper?

Social Implications (ifapplicable)

What will be the impact on society of this research? How will it influencepublic attitudes? How will it influence (corporate) social responsibility orenvironmental issues? How could it inform public or industry policy? Howmight it affect quality of life?

What is original/value ofpaper What is new in the paper? State the value of the paper and to whom.
http://msc.emeraldinsight.com/Authors/guidelines_page_5.htmlhttp://msc.emeraldinsight.com/Authors/guidelines_page_5.html


86/188

Examples

Example 1 Example 2 Example 3 Example 4 Example 5

Example 6


Literature review
http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/4629-06-revised.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Aliteraturereviewandclassification.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/A%20survey%20of%20the%20application%20of%20fuzzy%20set%20theory%20in%20production%20and%20operations.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/REFERENCE%20LIST%20ON%20LEADING%20VIRTUAL%20TEAMS.docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/sample%20for%20keywords.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/The%20State%20of%20the%20Art%20on%20Process%20Virtualization_%20A%20Literature%20Revi.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/The%20State%20of%20the%20Art%20on%20Process%20Virtualization_%20A%20Literature%20Revi.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/sample%20for%20keywords.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/REFERENCE%20LIST%20ON%20LEADING%20VIRTUAL%20TEAMS.docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/A%20survey%20of%20the%20application%20of%20fuzzy%20set%20theory%20in%20production%20and%20operations.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Aliteraturereviewandclassification.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/4629-06-revised.pdf


87/188

te atu e ev ew

MOHAMMADJAFARI, M., AHMED, S., DAWAL, S. Z. M. & ZAYANDEHROODI, H. 2011(Article in press). The Importance of Project Management in SMEs for the Development of NewProducts through E-Collaboration. African Journal of Business Management.



88/188

FIXSON, S. 2007. Modularity and commonality research: past developments and future opportunities. Concurrent Engineering, 15, 85.


Ch f h


89/188

Choose a category for the paper Research paper . This category covers papers which report on any type of research undertakenby the author(s). The research may involve the construction or testing of a model or framework,

action research, testing of data, market research or surveys, empirical, scientific or clinicalresearch.

Viewpoint . Any paper, where content is dependent on the author's opinion and interpretation,should be included in this category; this also includes journalistic pieces.

Technical paper . Describes and evaluates technical products, processes or services.

Conceptual paper . These papers will not be based on research but will develop hypotheses. Thepapers are likely to be discursive and will cover philosophical discussions and comparativestudies of others' work and thinking.

Case study . Case studies describe actual interventions or experiences within organizations.They may well be subjective and will not generally report on research. A description of a legalcase or a hypothetical case study used as a teaching exercise would also fit into this category.

Literature review . It is expected that all types of paper cite any relevant literature so this

category should only be used if the main purpose of the paper is to annotate and/or critique theliterature in a particular subject area. It may be a selective bibliography providing advice oninformation sources or it may be comprehensive in that the paper's aim is to cover the maincontributors to the development of a topic and explore their different views.

General review . This category covers those papers which provide an overview or historicalexamination of some concept, technique or phenomenon. The papers are likely to be moredescriptive or instructional ("how to" papers) than discursive

Source: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/authors/guides/write/abstracts.htm?part=1#2 Effective Use of Research & Publication Tools andResources 2014 By: Nader Ale Ebrahim
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/authors/guides/write/abstracts.htm?part=1http://www.emeraldinsight.com/authors/guides/write/abstracts.htm?part=1http://www.emeraldinsight.com/authors/guides/write/abstracts.htm?part=1


90/188

Acceptance Procedure


91/188


Source: http ://rmimr.wordpress.com/category/quality-measures/citation-impact/
http://rmimr.wordpress.com/category/quality-measures/citation-impact/http://rmimr.wordpress.com/category/quality-measures/citation-impact/http://rmimr.wordpress.com/category/quality-measures/citation-impact/http://rmimr.wordpress.com/category/quality-measures/citation-impact/http://rmimr.wordpress.com/category/quality-measures/citation-impact/


92/188


Source: How to Write Great Papers . From title to references. From submission to acceptance. Presented by: Anthony Newman. Publisher,. Elsevier, Amsterdam

The following graphic illustrates the stages illustrates the process, together withsome statistics, for Emerald's journal International Journal of Service Industry


93/188


j yManagement ( kindly supplied by the editor, Robert Johnston ).

Source: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/authors/guides/promote/review.htm
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/authors/guides/promote/review.htmhttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/authors/guides/promote/review.htmhttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/authors/guides/promote/review.htmhttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/authors/guides/promote/review.htmhttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/authors/guides/promote/review.htmhttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/authors/guides/promote/review.htmhttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/authors/guides/promote/review.htmhttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/authors/guides/promote/review.htmhttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/authors/guides/promote/review.htmhttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/authors/guides/promote/review.htmhttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/authors/guides/promote/review.htmhttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/authors/guides/promote/review.htmhttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/authors/guides/promote/review.htmhttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/authors/guides/promote/review.htmhttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/authors/guides/promote/review.htmhttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/authors/guides/promote/review.htmhttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/authors/guides/promote/review.htmhttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/authors/guides/promote/review.htmhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23262380


94/188


Gholizadeh, Hossein, Noor Azuan Abu Osman, Arezoo Eshraghi, Sadeeq Ali, and Elham Sadat Yahyavi. "Satisfaction and problems experienced with transfemoral suspension systems: a comparisonbetween common suction socket and Seal-In liner." Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (2012).

Peer review processflowchart
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23262380http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23262380http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999312012336http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23262380http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23262380http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999312012336http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23262380


95/188


Source: http://www.elsevier.com/reviewers/reviewer-guidelines
http://www.elsevier.com/reviewers/reviewer-guidelineshttp://www.elsevier.com/reviewers/reviewer-guidelineshttp://www.elsevier.com/reviewers/reviewer-guidelineshttp://www.elsevier.com/reviewers/reviewer-guidelines


96/188


97/188


Acceptance Procedure


98/188

Acceptance Procedure Editor-in-Chief tests the manuscript according to the several criteria

of subject scope , style , apparent technical validity , topicalimportance , relationship to prior publication , conciseness ,appropriate references , and length . Papers that vary widely from theprescribed archival style (those written as speeches, ill-defined

manuscripts, progress reports or news releases, or those stronglyflavoured with advertising) will not be considered for publication.

Associate Editor (Editor ) evaluates the paper according to thesame criteria and, in most cases, has the paper sent to one or more

reviewers in the field (usually two) for confidential review. The Associate Editor may, however, at his or her discretion, accept thepaper without review, reject it giving explicit reason, or request thatthe author prepare it in a different format.


E l
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/products/journals/author_guidelines.htm?id=imds


99/188

Example (Source: Industrial Management & Data Systems )

The reviewing processEach paper is reviewed by the editor and, if it is judged suitable for the publication, it is then sent to

two referees for double blind peer review. Based on their recommendations, the Editor thendecides whether the paper should be accepted as is, revised or rejected. The Editor may,however, vary this process in some circumstances.

Copyright Articles submitted to the journal should not have been published before in their current or substantially

similar form, or be under consideration for publication with another journal. Please see Emerald'soriginality guidelines for details. Use this in conjunction with the points below about references,before submission i.e. always attribute clearly using either indented text or quote marks as well asmaking use of the preferred Harvard style of formatting. Authors submitting articles for publicationwarrant that the work is not an infringement of any existing copyright and will indemnify thepublisher against any breach of such warranty. For ease of dissemination and to ensure properpolicing of use, papers and contributions become the legal copyright of the publisher unlessotherwise agreed.

The editor may make use of iThenticate software for checking the originality of submissions received.Please see our press release for further details.

http://www.emeraldinsight.com/products/journals/author_guidelines.htm?id=imdshttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/authors/writing/originality.htmhttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/authors/writing/originality.htmhttp://www.ithenticate.com/index.htmlhttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/about/news/archive.htm?id=31http://www.emeraldinsight.com/about/news/archive.htm?id=31http://www.ithenticate.com/index.htmlhttp://www.ithenticate.com/index.htmlhttp://www.ithenticate.com/index.htmlhttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/authors/writing/originality.htmhttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/authors/writing/originality.htmhttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/products/journals/author_guidelines.htm?id=imds


100/188

Retrac t io n Watc h Two cancer papers retracted becauseauthors are unable to guarantee theaccuracy of some of the figures

UK researcher who faked data getsthree months in jail

Retraction 12 appears for AlirioMelendez, this one for plagiarism
http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2013/04/26/two-cancer-papers-retracted-because-authors-are-unable-to-guarantee-the-accuracy-of-some-of-the-figures/http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2013/04/26/two-cancer-papers-retracted-because-authors-are-unable-to-guarantee-the-accuracy-of-some-of-the-figures/http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2013/04/26/two-cancer-papers-retracted-because-authors-are-unable-to-guarantee-the-accuracy-of-some-of-the-figures/http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2013/04/26/two-cancer-papers-retracted-because-authors-are-unable-to-guarantee-the-accuracy-of-some-of-the-figures/http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2013/04/17/uk-researcher-who-faked-data-gets-three-months-in-jail/http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2013/04/17/uk-researcher-who-faked-data-gets-three-months-in-jail/http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2013/04/15/retraction-12-appears-for-alirio-melendez-this-one-for-plagiarism/http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2013/04/15/retraction-12-appears-for-alirio-melendez-this-one-for-plagiarism/http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2013/04/15/retraction-12-appears-for-alirio-melendez-this-one-for-plagiarism/http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2013/04/15/retraction-12-appears-for-alirio-melendez-this-one-for-plagiarism/http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2013/04/15/retraction-12-appears-for-alirio-melendez-this-one-for-plagiarism/http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2013/04/15/retraction-12-appears-for-alirio-melendez-this-one-for-plagiarism/http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2013/04/15/retraction-12-appears-for-alirio-melendez-this-one-for-plagiarism/http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2013/04/15/retraction-12-appears-for-alirio-melendez-this-one-for-plagiarism/http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2013/04/17/uk-researcher-who-faked-data-gets-three-months-in-jail/http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2013/04/17/uk-researcher-who-faked-data-gets-three-months-in-jail/http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2013/04/17/uk-researcher-who-faked-data-gets-three-months-in-jail/http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2013/04/17/uk-researcher-who-faked-data-gets-three-months-in-jail/http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2013/04/26/two-cancer-papers-retracted-because-authors-are-unable-to-guarantee-the-accuracy-of-some-of-the-figures/http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2013/04/26/two-cancer-papers-retracted-because-authors-are-unable-to-guarantee-the-accuracy-of-some-of-the-figures/http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2013/04/26/two-cancer-papers-retracted-because-authors-are-unable-to-guarantee-the-accuracy-of-some-of-the-figures/http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2013/04/26/two-cancer-papers-retracted-because-authors-are-unable-to-guarantee-the-accuracy-of-some-of-the-figures/http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2013/04/26/two-cancer-papers-retracted-because-authors-are-unable-to-guarantee-the-accuracy-of-some-of-the-figures/http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/http://retractionwatch.com/2014/07/14/taiwans-education-minister-resigns-in-wake-of-sage-peer-review-scandal/


101/188


Source: http://retractionwatch.com/2014/07/14/taiwans-education-minister-resigns-in-wake-of-sage-peer-review-scandal/
http://retractionwatch.com/2014/07/14/taiwans-education-minister-resigns-in-wake-of-sage-peer-review-scandal/http://retractionwatch.com/2014/07/14/taiwans-education-minister-resigns-in-wake-of-sage-peer-review-scandal/http://retractionwatch.com/2014/07/14/taiwans-education-minister-resigns-in-wake-of-sage-peer-review-scandal/http://retractionwatch.com/2014/07/14/taiwans-education-minister-resigns-in-wake-of-sage-peer-review-scandal/http://retractionwatch.com/2014/07/14/taiwans-education-minister-resigns-in-wake-of-sage-peer-review-scandal/http://retractionwatch.com/2014/07/14/taiwans-education-minister-resigns-in-wake-of-sage-peer-review-scandal/http://retractionwatch.com/2014/07/14/taiwans-education-minister-resigns-in-wake-of-sage-peer-review-scandal/http://retractionwatch.com/2014/07/14/taiwans-education-minister-resigns-in-wake-of-sage-peer-review-scandal/http://retractionwatch.com/2014/07/14/taiwans-education-minister-resigns-in-wake-of-sage-peer-review-scandal/http://retractionwatch.com/2014/07/14/taiwans-education-minister-resigns-in-wake-of-sage-peer-review-scandal/http://retractionwatch.com/2014/07/14/taiwans-education-minister-resigns-in-wake-of-sage-peer-review-scandal/http://retractionwatch.com/2014/07/14/taiwans-education-minister-resigns-in-wake-of-sage-peer-review-scandal/http://retractionwatch.com/2014/07/14/taiwans-education-minister-resigns-in-wake-of-sage-peer-review-scandal/http://retractionwatch.com/2014/07/14/taiwans-education-minister-resigns-in-wake-of-sage-peer-review-scandal/http://retractionwatch.com/2014/07/14/taiwans-education-minister-resigns-in-wake-of-sage-peer-review-scandal/http://retractionwatch.com/2014/07/14/taiwans-education-minister-resigns-in-wake-of-sage-peer-review-scandal/http://retractionwatch.com/2014/07/14/taiwans-education-minister-resigns-in-wake-of-sage-peer-review-scandal/http://retractionwatch.com/2014/07/14/taiwans-education-minister-resigns-in-wake-of-sage-peer-review-scandal/http://retractionwatch.com/2014/07/14/taiwans-education-minister-resigns-in-wake-of-sage-peer-review-scandal/http://retractionwatch.com/2014/07/14/taiwans-education-minister-resigns-in-wake-of-sage-peer-review-scandal/http://retractionwatch.com/2014/07/14/taiwans-education-minister-resigns-in-wake-of-sage-peer-review-scandal/http://retractionwatch.com/2014/07/14/taiwans-education-minister-resigns-in-wake-of-sage-peer-review-scandal/http://retractionwatch.com/2014/07/14/taiwans-education-minister-resigns-in-wake-of-sage-peer-review-scandal/http://retractionwatch.com/2014/07/14/taiwans-education-minister-resigns-in-wake-of-sage-peer-review-scandal/


102/188


Source: Van Noorden R. . Science publishing : the trouble with retractions . Nature 2011;478:26 8

Similarity score
http://www.nature.com/news/2011/111005/pdf/478026a.pdfhttp://www.nature.com/news/2011/111005/pdf/478026a.pdfhttp://www.nature.com/news/2011/111005/pdf/478026a.pdfhttp://www.nature.com/news/2011/111005/pdf/478026a.pdfhttp://www.nature.com/news/2011/111005/pdf/478026a.pdfhttp://www.nature.com/news/2011/111005/pdf/478026a.pdfhttp://www.nature.com/news/2011/111005/pdf/478026a.pdfhttp://www.nature.com/news/2011/111005/pdf/478026a.pdfhttp://www.nature.com/news/2011/111005/pdf/478026a.pdfhttp://www.nature.com/news/2011/111005/pdf/478026a.pdfhttp://www.nature.com/news/2011/111005/pdf/478026a.pdfhttp://www.nature.com/news/2011/111005/pdf/478026a.pdfhttp://www.nature.com/news/2011/111005/pdf/478026a.pdfhttp://www.nature.com/news/2011/111005/pdf/478026a.pdfhttp://www.nature.com/news/2011/111005/pdf/478026a.pdfhttp://www.nature.com/news/2011/111005/pdf/478026a.pdfhttp://www.nature.com/news/2011/111005/pdf/478026a.pdfhttp://www.nature.com/news/2011/111005/pdf/478026a.pdfhttp://www.nature.com/news/2011/111005/pdf/478026a.pdfhttp://www.nature.com/news/2011/111005/pdf/478026a.pdfhttp://www.nature.com/news/2011/111005/pdf/478026a.pdfhttp://www.nature.com/news/2011/111005/pdf/478026a.pdfhttp://www.nature.com/news/2011/111005/pdf/478026a.pdfhttp://www.nature.com/news/2011/111005/pdf/478026a.pdfhttp://www.nature.com/news/2011/111005/pdf/478026a.pdfhttp://www.nature.com/news/2011/111005/pdf/478026a.pdfhttp://www.nature.com/news/2011/111005/pdf/478026a.pdfhttp://www.nature.com/news/2011/111005/pdf/478026a.pdfhttp://www.nature.com/news/2011/111005/pdf/478026a.pdf


103/188

Similarity score

The similarity score indicates how similarthis paper is to other papers, with valuesranging from 0 (no similarities) to 100

(completely the same). High scores, e.g.,above 30, may indicate that parts of thepaper have been copied from elsewhere.

Effective Use of Research & Publication Tools and

Resources 2014 By: Nader Ale Ebrahim

High similarity rate


104/188

High similarity rate

Dear Dr .,

Thanks for your effective work. We also finish the Cross Checking work here.We found four papers (your Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 ) could not arrive ourstandards, e.g. the similarity rate is very high, which means these papershave duplicated or salami-slicing, self-plagiarism problem. We can't acceptthese. When you see the attached reports, you will understand us here... . Thanks.

Best wishes,?????


http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Crosscheck%20similarity%20reports%2077.133.156.542/APIEMS133%20summary.htmhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Crosscheck%20similarity%20reports%2077.133.156.542/APIEMS156%20summary.htmhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Crosscheck%20similarity%20reports%2077.133.156.542/APIEMS542%20summary.htmhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Crosscheck%20similarity%20reports%2077.133.156.542/APIEMS77%20summary.htmhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Crosscheck%20similarity%20reports%2077.133.156.542/APIEMS77%20summary.htmhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Crosscheck%20similarity%20reports%2077.133.156.542/APIEMS542%20summary.htmhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Crosscheck%20similarity%20reports%2077.133.156.542/APIEMS156%20summary.htmhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Crosscheck%20similarity%20reports%2077.133.156.542/APIEMS133%20summary.htm


105/188

Acceptance Procedure C


106/188

Acceptance Procedure Con. Reviewer is asked to judge the technical validity of the manuscript

and the extent of its advance over work previously published. Thereviewer is asked also for advice as to whether the paper meritspublication in the journal. However, the decision to publish, torequire major revision before publication, or to reject for reasons

cited lies first with the Associate Editor and ultimately with the Editor-in-Chief.

Editorial Decision to Accept or Reject - The Editors will inform theauthor of their decision (acceptance, conditional acceptance, or

rejection). In the case of rejection, the author will be given specificreasons related to the criteria. In the case of conditional acceptance,the required revisions will be clearly indicated. On some occasions,the Editors may anticipate a need for further reviews after revision; ifso, the author will be notified.



What are the criteria by which the
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/authors/guides/promote/review.htmhttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/authors/guides/promote/review.htmhttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/authors/guides/promote/review.htmhttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/authors/guides/promote/review.htm


107/188

paper will be judged? Is the subject appropriate to the editorial aims and sco pe of the journal? Originalit y: does the article say something original, does it add to the body of knowledge, etc.? If a case study, is

this its first use? Research methodology : most journals are concerned about this, as would be expected for an academic publisher.

Is the research design, methodology, theoretical approach, critical review, etc. sound? Are the results wellpresented, do they correlate to the theory, and have they been correctly interpreted? Is the analysis sufficientlyrigourous?

Is the paper set in the context of the wider literature, are there sufficient relevant citings, are these well referencedand are other people's views credited ?

Is the paper accurate , is any information missing or wrong? Is the structure logical , is the sequence of the material appropriate, is there a good introduction and are the

summary and conclusions adequate? Does the title of the article accurately reflect its content? How useful would the article be to a practitioner , is it a useful example of "good practice"? Could the study be

replicated in other situations? Is the material clearly presented, readable ? Are graphs and tables used to good effect? Is the level of detail

appropriate? Is the use of terminology appropriate to the readership? Is the perspective appropriate for an international audience ? Questions of format : are the abstract, keywords etc. appropriate? Is it an appropriate length (note: many journals will stipulate length requirements in their author guidelines)?



Source: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/authors/guides/promote/review.htm

Reviewer
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/authors/guides/promote/review.htmhttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/authors/guides/promote/review.htmhttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/authors/guides/promote/review.htmhttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/authors/guides/promote/review.htmhttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/authors/guides/promote/review.htmhttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/authors/guides/promote/review.htm


108/188

Reviewer

Compatibility with the journaltopics Scientific level The clear answers to the

questions:- What is the problem?- What is done by other people?- What the author did?- What is new?

- What is the authorcontribution?

Organization of the paper:- problem statements,- application area,- research course,- methods used,

- results,- further research,- interest in cooperation,- acknowledgements,- references

Language:- spelling,- style,- grammar



Some General Rule for Reviewers
http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/What%20the%20reviewer%20look%20for%20when%20reviewing%20an%20article%20for%20a%20Journal.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/What%20the%20reviewer%20look%20for%20when%20reviewing%20an%20article%20for%20a%20Journal.pdf


109/188

Some General Rule for Reviewers

Almost 90% of the journal follow theserules. so, you check yourself how yourpaper is before you send it out.



Acceptance Procedure Con
http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/What%20the%20reviewer%20look%20for%20when%20reviewing%20an%20article%20for%20a%20Journal.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/What%20the%20reviewer%20look%20for%20when%20reviewing%20an%20article%20for%20a%20Journal.pdf


110/188

Acceptance Procedure Con. Author - If the paper has been rejected or if extensive revisions

have been requested that the author believes are incorrect orunwarranted, then he or she is entitled to submit a point-by-pointrebuttal to the Editors statement of reasons and the reviewers comments.

Editors - The rebuttal then is analyzed by the Editors, and adecision is made. In rare cases of a complex point of dispute, theEditors, at their discretion, may mandate additional reviews. In nocase shall a paper go through more than two reviewing cyclesbefore a decision is given.

Editor-in-Chief - If the dispute still remains unresolved, then the decision of the Editor-in-Chief is final and overrides all other

considerations.





111/188

Acceptance Procedure Con. Rebuttal by Author (for rejected paper) - In the confrontation

between the rejection statement and the rebuttal statement, thedecision goes in favour of the author if the dissenting reviewers case is not clearly convincing.

Authors who are requested by Editors to revise their papers mustmake an effort to accomplish the requested revisions in the statedperiod, which normally is four weeks for major revisions , twoweeks for minor revisions . If the author does not respond to thesubsequent inquiries, the paper will be regarded as withdrawn.

Normally, an author who has good reason to request a timeextension will be granted such an extension.




112/188



113/188

Acceptance Procedure Con. When a paper is formally accepted , it will be scheduled forpublication in a forthcoming issue, and the author will be so

informed. Depending upon the number of papers awaitingpublication and the projected size of issues, this may require thatpapers be scheduled several issues ahead. Editor-in-Chief also may

designate certain special-category papers for immediate publication.

Page proofs will be made available to authors for correction andrelease prior to scheduled publication. Authors should inform theJournal department of any anticipated change of postal or e-mail

address between acceptance and page proof time. Authors areexpected to read and release their proofs in seven days or less.





114/188

Acceptance Procedure Con.

Overscheduled - To allow for late or non-release of proofs byauthors and to provide the flexibility to meet issue-length and topic-mix constraints, issues will be overscheduled by about 25%. Thus,there will always be a certain number of papers held over for the

next issue. Papers not published in the issue for which they wereoriginally scheduled will have first priority for publication in thefollowing issue.



Example - Proofing Instructions


115/188

Example Proofing Instructions The proofreading stage is intended to catch any errors in the galley's spelling, grammar, and formatting. More substantial changes cannot be

made at this stage, unless discussed with the Section Editor. In Layout, click on VIEW PROOF to see the HTML, PDF and other availablefile formats used in publishing this item.

For Spelling and Grammar Errors

Copy the problem word or groups of words and paste them into the Proofreading Corrections box with "CHANGE-TO" instructions to theeditor as follows...

1. CHANGE...then the others

TO...than the others

2. CHANGE...MalinowskyTO...Malinowski

For Formatting Errors

Describe the location and nature of the problem in the Proofreading Corrections box after typing in the title "FORMATTING" as follows...

3. FORMATTINGThe numbers in Table 3 are not aligned in the third column.

4. FORMATTINGThe paragraph that begins "This last topic..." is not indented.



Referees Report Form


116/188

Referee s Report Form

Example 1 Example 2



Please kind ly complete the following form and submit. Referee report received after ten days from the date shown above will not affectthe decision of acceptance or rejection of the article. An average rating of 6 is required for the acceptance of the article.

Top of Form

1. English grammar and readabili ty

1(Poor) 2 3 4 5 6(Average) 7 8 9 10(Excellent)

2. Reference of previous contributions in books and journals


3. Chances of free from potentially serious errors which may invalidate the results


4. New technical contributions


5. Quality as a review article


6. Summary rating of the overall quality of the article


7. ReviewComments

Reviewer Guidelines
http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Referee%E2%80%99s%20Report%20Form/Referee%20Report%20Form%201.docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Referee%E2%80%99s%20Report%20Form/Reviewers%20Guide%20AJBM.docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Referee%E2%80%99s%20Report%20Form/Referee%20Report%20Form%201.docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Referee%E2%80%99s%20Report%20Form/Referee%20Report%20Form%201.docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Referee%E2%80%99s%20Report%20Form/Reviewers%20Guide%20AJBM.docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Referee%E2%80%99s%20Report%20Form/Reviewers%20Guide%20AJBM.docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Referee%E2%80%99s%20Report%20Form/Reviewers%20Guide%20AJBM.docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Referee%E2%80%99s%20Report%20Form/Reviewers%20Guide%20AJBM.docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Referee%E2%80%99s%20Report%20Form/Reviewers%20Guide%20AJBM.docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Referee%E2%80%99s%20Report%20Form/Reviewers%20Guide%20AJBM.docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Referee%E2%80%99s%20Report%20Form/Reviewers%20Guide%20AJBM.docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Referee%E2%80%99s%20Report%20Form/Referee%20Report%20Form%201.docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Referee%E2%80%99s%20Report%20Form/APIEMS%202010-Reviewer%20Guidelines.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Referee%E2%80%99s%20Report%20Form/APIEMS%202010-Reviewer%20Guidelines.pdf


117/188

Reviewer Guidelines

1. A general rule is "Don't spend more time reviewing the submissionthan the author spent writing it." If you find that a submission has somany problems that it would require a complete rewrite to save it,make a reasonable number of comments and reject the submission.

2. If you review a submission that is excessively similar to previouslypublished submissions (or you have reason to believe that thesubmission has previously been published), please note this toEditor.

3. Editorial comments are helpful to authors. However, readability is afactor in a good submission. If the use of language is so poor that itmakes reading difficult, please note this in your comments andreflect it in your ranking.



Reviewer comments
http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Referee%E2%80%99s%20Report%20Form/APIEMS%202010-Reviewer%20Guidelines.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Referee%E2%80%99s%20Report%20Form/APIEMS%202010-Reviewer%20Guidelines.pdf


118/188

Reviewer comments

Reviewers Evaluation Report (Reject) Reject- does not comply with the aims and scope Reject with helpful comments -1 Reject with helpful comments -2 Reject with helpful comments -3

Requires Major Revision Moderate Revision



Reviewer comments Con
http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Reviewer%E2%80%99s%20Evaluation%20Report-Ex1.docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/does%20not%20comply%2021-01-2010.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/does%20not%20comply%2021-01-2010.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Reject-R&D%20Management.dochttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Rejected%20-Technovation.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Rejected-%20IEEE-TEM.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Requires%20Major%20Revision-SRE.docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Moderate%20Revision-%20AJBM.docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Moderate%20Revision-%20AJBM.docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Requires%20Major%20Revision-SRE.docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Rejected-%20IEEE-TEM.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Rejected%20-Technovation.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Reject-R&D%20Management.dochttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/does%20not%20comply%2021-01-2010.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/does%20not%20comply%2021-01-2010.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/does%20not%20comply%2021-01-2010.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/does%20not%20comply%2021-01-2010.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Reviewer%E2%80%99s%20Evaluation%20Report-Ex1.docx


119/188

Reviewer comments Con.

Some suggestions The manuscript needs a substantial

improvement

Acceptable for publication Not acceptable for publication Cannot accept your manuscript Major correction - References (not already cited in the paper)



Manuscript is not suitable!
http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Wazed/report-2.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Wazed/report-3.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Wazed/report-3.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Wazed/acceptable%20for%20publication.docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Wazed/reviewer%20comments.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Reject%20From%20JPIM_COMMENTS%20TO%20AUTHOR%2010-035%20OUT%20(3).pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Referee_Report_on_DB_2010_12.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Referee_Report_on_DB_2010_12.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Referee_Report_on_DB_2010_12.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Reject%20From%20JPIM_COMMENTS%20TO%20AUTHOR%2010-035%20OUT%20(3).pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Wazed/reviewer%20comments.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Wazed/acceptable%20for%20publication.docxhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Wazed/report-3.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Wazed/report-3.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Wazed/report-2.pdf


120/188

Manuscript is not suitable!

Dear ..........:This manuscript is not suitable for the Advanced Science Letters. Please

submit to other journal.Best regards,H. S. Nalwa

Katsuhiko Ariga ______________________________________________________________Dear ........,I regret to inform you that I cannot accept your paper for publication in

Management Science. My decision is based on lack of fit. In particular, yourwork is not well tied to the Management Science literature and researchstyle.

I wish you good luck in pursuing another journal for publishing your work.Best regards,Yossi Aviv



Revised version


121/188

Revised version

Step by step corrections (with minor modification) Step by step corrections base on

reviewer's comments

Compare the old and the new version ofpaper (with major modification)

Response to the editorial issues



Henson's Tips to Writers
http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/step%20by%20step%20actions%20SRE-09-004%20Ale%20Ebrahim%20et%20al%2021-12-09.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Step%20by%20step%20corrections%20base%20on%20Reviewer's%20Comments.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Step%20by%20step%20corrections%20base%20on%20Reviewer's%20Comments.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Compare%20old%20with%20new%20version%20of%20(SRE-09-454%20Ebrahim).pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Compare%20old%20with%20new%20version%20of%20(SRE-09-454%20Ebrahim).pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Wazed/Reviewer%201%20and%204.dochttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/step%20by%20step%20actions%20SRE-09-004%20Ale%20Ebrahim%20et%20al%2021-12-09.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/step%20by%20step%20actions%20SRE-09-004%20Ale%20Ebrahim%20et%20al%2021-12-09.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Wazed/Reviewer%201%20and%204.dochttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Wazed/Reviewer%201%20and%204.dochttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Compare%20old%20with%20new%20version%20of%20(SRE-09-454%20Ebrahim).pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Compare%20old%20with%20new%20version%20of%20(SRE-09-454%20Ebrahim).pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Step%20by%20step%20corrections%20base%20on%20Reviewer's%20Comments.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Step%20by%20step%20corrections%20base%20on%20Reviewer's%20Comments.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/step%20by%20step%20actions%20SRE-09-004%20Ale%20Ebrahim%20et%20al%2021-12-09.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/step%20by%20step%20actions%20SRE-09-004%20Ale%20Ebrahim%20et%20al%2021-12-09.pdfhttp://www.academicleadership.org/support/publishing-assistancehttp://www.academicleadership.org/support/publishing-assistance


122/188

Henson s Tips to Writers

do not fear rejection--it is part of the writing process do not be preoccupied with telling readers everything you know--

instead help readers discover insights target your articles to journals that have an acceptance rate of at

least 20%

do not be afraid to call the editor of the journal stay within the preferred article length of the target journal write what you have to say and then edit your manuscript several

times, eliminating everything that's unnecessary always say yes to rewriting parts of the manuscript if requested to do

so avoid jargon follow the journal's guidelines do not make technical and grammatical errors


http://www.academicleadership.org/support/publishing-assistancehttp://www.academicleadership.org/support/publishing-assistance


123/188

Target suitable journal

Open-Access Journals


124/188

Open Access Journals

Effective Use of Research & Publi cation Tools and


Image: iStockPhoto

Special Issues
http://www.springer.com/open+access/open+choice?SGWID=0-40359-0-0-0&cm_mmc=Doubleclick-_-Other-_-SMD555-_-Open%20Choice%20bannerhttp://www.springer.com/open+access/open+choice?SGWID=0-40359-0-0-0&cm_mmc=Doubleclick-_-Other-_-SMD555-_-Open%20Choice%20bannerhttp://www.springer.com/open+access/open+choice?SGWID=0-40359-0-0-0&cm_mmc=Doubleclick-_-Other-_-SMD555-_-Open%20Choice%20bannerhttp://www.doaj.org/


125/188

Special Issues


http://www.journals.elsevier.com/applied-and-translational-genomics/call-for-papers/submit-your-research-to-multiple-special-issues/http://www.signalprocessingsociety.org/publications/special-issues-2/


126/188



Where should I submit my publication?
http://www.springer.com/computer/database+management+&+information+retrieval/journal/11192http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Where%20should%20I%20submit%20my%20paper%2020090401.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Where%20should%20I%20submit%20my%20paper%2020090401.pdf


127/188

Springer Journal Selector eta

Journal Selector

Journal Selector is the industry's leadingdatabase to all of the best peer-reviewedbiomedical journals.


http://springer.journal-advisor.com/http://springer.journal-advisor.com/http://springer.journal-advisor.com/http://journalselector.com/http://journalselector.com/http://journalselector.com/http://journalselector.com/http://journalselector.com/http://journalselector.com/http://journalselector.com/http://springer.journal-advisor.com/http://springer.journal-advisor.com/http://springer.journal-advisor.com/http://www.edanzediting.com/


128/188


129/188



Where should I submit my publication?
http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Where%20should%20I%20submit%20my%20paper%2020090401.pdfhttp://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_4/Link/Where%20should%20I%20submit%20my%20paper%2020090401.pdf


130/188




131/188

Scholarly Open Access
http://scholarlyoa.com/http://scholarlyoa.com/


132/188

Potent ia l, p o ss ib le, o rpro bable predatory sc ho lar ly

op en-acc ess pu bl i sh ers

By: Jeffrey Beall

Source: http://scholarlyoa.com/publishers/
http://scholarlyoa.com/publishers/http://scholarlyoa.com/publishers/http://scholarlyoa.com/publishers/


133/188

Promote your publication to getmore citation


134/188



Source: http://altmetrics.org/manifesto /

Example
http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/


135/188

p



Source: N. Ale Ebrahim, H. Salehi, M. A. Embi, F. Habibi Tanha, H. Gholizadeh , and S. M. Motahar, Visibility and Citation Impact,

International Education Studies, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 120-125, March 30, 2014.

Example
http://ssrn.com/abstract=2419315http://ssrn.com/abstract=2419315http://ssrn.com/abstract=2419315http://ssrn.com/abstract=2419315http://ssrn.com/abstract=2419315http://ssrn.com/abstract=2419315http://ssrn.com/abstract=2419315http://ssrn.com/abstract=2419315http://ssrn.com/abstract=2419315http://ssrn.com/abstract=2419315http://ssrn.com/abstract=2419315http://ssrn.com/abstract=2419315http://ssrn.com/abstract=2419315http://ssrn.com/abstract=2419315http://ssrn.com/abstract=2419315http://ssrn.com/abstract=2419315


136/188

p



Source: N. Ale Ebrahim, H. Salehi, M. A. Embi, F. Habibi Tanha, H. Gholizadeh , and S. M. Motahar, Visibility and Citation Impact,International Education Studies, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 120-125, March 30, 2014.

http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/ 2012-13 /regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyo
http://ssrn.com/abstract=2419315http://ssrn.com/abstract=2419315http://ssrn.com/abstract=2419315http://ssrn.com/abstract=2419315http://ssrn.com/abstract=2419315http://ssrn.com/abstract=2419315http://ssrn.com/abstract=2419315http://ssrn.com/abstract=2419315http://ssrn.com/abstract=2419315http://ssrn.com/abstract=2419315http://ssrn.com/abstract=2419315http://ssrn.com/abstract=2419315http://ssrn.com/abstract=2419315http://ssrn.com/abstract=2419315http://ssrn.com/abstract=2419315http://ssrn.com/abstract=2419315http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyo


137/188



http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/ 2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyo
http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyo


138/188


http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/methodology


139/188


http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/methodologyhttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/methodologyhttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/methodology


140/188

http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/world-ranking/institution/university-of-tokyo
http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/world-ranking/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/world-ranking/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/world-ranking/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/world-ranking/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/world-ranking/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/world-ranking/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/world-ranking/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/world-ranking/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/world-ranking/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/world-ranking/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/world-ranking/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/world-ranking/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/world-ranking/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/world-ranking/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/world-ranking/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/world-ranking/institution/university-of-tokyo


141/188



http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/national-university-of-singapore
http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/world-ranking/institution/university-of-tokyohttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/national-university-of-singaporehttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/national-university-of-singaporehttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/national-university-of-singaporehttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/national-university-of-singaporehttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/national-university-of-singaporehttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/national-university-of-singaporehttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/national-university-of-singaporehttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/national-university-of-singaporehttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/national-university-of-singaporehttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/national-university-of-singaporehttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/national-university-of-singaporehttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/national-university-of-singaporehttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/national-university-of-singaporehttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/national-university-of-singaporehttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/national-university-of-singaporehttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/national-university-of-singaporehttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/national-university-of-singaporehttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/national-university-of-singapore


142/188



http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/national-university-of-singapore
http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/national-university-of-singaporehttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/national-university-of-singaporehttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/national-university-of-singaporehttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/national-university-of-singaporehttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/national-university-of-singaporehttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/national-university-of-singaporehttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/national-university-of-singaporehttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/national-university-of-singaporehttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/national-university-of-singaporehttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/national-university-of-singaporehttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/national-university-of-singaporehttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/national-university-of-singaporehttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/national-university-of-singaporehttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/national-university-of-singaporehttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/national-university-of-singaporehttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/national-university-of-singaporehttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/national-university-of-singaporehttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/national-university-of-singaporehttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/national-university-of-singapore


143/188



http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/sharif-university-of-technology
http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/national-university-of-singaporehttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/sharif-university-of-technologyhttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/sharif-university-of-technologyhttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/sharif-university-of-technologyhttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/sharif-university-of-technologyhttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/sharif-university-of-technologyhttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/sharif-university-of-technologyhttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/sharif-university-of-technologyhttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/sharif-university-of-technologyhttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/sharif-university-of-technologyhttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/sharif-university-of-technologyhttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/sharif-university-of-technologyhttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/sharif-university-of-technologyhttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/sharif-university-of-technologyhttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/sharif-university-of-technologyhttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/sharif-university-of-technologyhttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/sharif-university-of-technologyhttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/sharif-university-of-technologyhttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/sharif-university-of-technology


144/188



http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/sharif-university-of-technology
http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/sharif-university-of-technologyhttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/sharif-university-of-technologyhttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/sharif-university-of-technologyhttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/sharif-university-of-technologyhttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/sharif-university-of-technologyhttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/sharif-university-of-technologyhttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/sharif-university-of-technologyhttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/sharif-university-of-technologyhttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/sharif-university-of-technologyhttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/sharif-university-of-technologyhttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/sharif-university-of-technologyhttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/sharif-university-of-technologyhttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/sharif-university-of-technologyhttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/sharif-university-of-technologyhttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/sharif-university-of-technologyhttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/sharif-university-of-technologyhttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/sharif-university-of-technologyhttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/sharif-university-of-technologyhttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/sharif-university-of-technology


145/188



http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/universiti-kebangsaan-malaysia
http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/sharif-university-of-technologyhttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/universiti-kebangsaan-malaysiahttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/universiti-kebangsaan-malaysiahttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/universiti-kebangsaan-malaysiahttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/universiti-kebangsaan-malaysiahttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/universiti-kebangsaan-malaysiahttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/universiti-kebangsaan-malaysiahttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/universiti-kebangsaan-malaysiahttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/universiti-kebangsaan-malaysiahttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/universiti-kebangsaan-malaysiahttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/universiti-kebangsaan-malaysiahttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/universiti-kebangsaan-malaysiahttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/universiti-kebangsaan-malaysiahttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/universiti-kebangsaan-malaysiahttp://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2012-13/regional-ranking/region/asia/institution/universiti-keba

effective use of research & publication tools and resources – part 2

Documents