ehjeh asher ehjeh

8/2/2019 Ehjeh Asher Ehjeh

1/39

Ehjeh asher Ehjeh

I-Jeh asher I-Jeh

Ehyeh Asher Ehyeh

Jesus Messieh Fellowship

Light To The Nations

Acts 4:12 Defines One Salvation Name

IT IS JESUS

A study on the name JESUS the only name for Salvation

By Cohen G. Reckart, Pastor

Copyright, All Rights Reserved

May NOT BE POSTED ON ANY OTHER WEB SITE

"This hypothesis is not intrinsically improbable--and in Aramaic, a language

closely related to Hebrew, "to be" actually is hawa--but it should be noted that in

adopting it we admit that, using the name Hebrew in the historical sense, Yahweh is

not a Hebrew name" (Ency. Brit. 1958 Ed. Vol 12. p. 996).

Today we can not know what the original vowels were, but Yahweh is as good as

guess as we can make, though other spellings are often used" (Samuel A. Cartledge,

A Conservative Introduction To The Old Testament, p. 51).

Yahweh is not a Hebrew name! Who will place their trust of eternal salvation in aguess name? For the honest student, Aramaic is the language of Mystery Babylon

and was adopted by the Jews when taken captive there around 587BC. Aramaic

replaced ancient Paleo Hebrew and nearly all the existing manuscripts, including

the Masoretic text and the Dead Sea Scrolls, are in the Babylonian Aramaic

alphabet. THERE IS NO PROOF THAT ARAMAIC IS PRONOUNCED LIKE

ANCIENT PALEO HEBREW, AND TO TAKE "HAWA" AN ARAMAIC FORM

OF "TO BE" AND SUPERIMPOSE THIS UPON HYH (EHYEH) AS THE BASIS

TO INVENT YHWH AND THEN FABRICATE THE GUESS NAME

YAHWEH, ...IS LINGUISTIC FRAUD!
mailto:[email protected]://jesus-messiah.com/html/copyright.htmlhttp://jesus-messiah.com/html/copyright.htmlmailto:[email protected]


2/39

These four letters are Babylonian Aramaic . They are not sacred and

they are not holy. They are profane! Any meanings associated with the Babylonian

Aramaic alphabet letters that have been adopted into Jewish mysticism (Kabbalah)

are a high form of witchcraft and sorcery of changing the Truth of God into a lie

(Jeremiah 23:27; Romans 1:25).

The antichrist Concision (Law keepers, Noahides) who worship the

tetragrammaton YHWH, hail the Aramaic alphabet letters of Mystery Babylon to

be sacred and holy and the guess name Yahweh derived from them to be the sacred

name of God. Modern antichrist Yahwist claim they have now translated Matthew

and the other New Testament books from Aramaic or Syraic (same thing), are

soothsayers and liars. There are no such original manuscripts. Any translations by

these Yahwist are of the devil since they purposely interpolate YHWH (name of

Baal) and even the guess name Yahweh into these fabrications.

Lets start off this examination with an old 1860 Bible Dictionary written by thehonorable Sir. William Smith, English lexicographer. The revised and censored

Smith Bible Dictionary can still be purchased but what I am about to post has long

been censored out of later editions.

Under the word "moon" we find this entry: --"Three names of the moon were used

by the Hebrews: YAREAH, paleness;LEBONAH, white; andHODESH(renewing)

new moon" (p 206). We focus our attention of the name "YAREAH" which is the

same as YAHREAH and YAHWEH, the first "H" after the letter "a" being

dropped in the English transliteration and also dropped from more modern

Hebrew translations. Strongs renders the word "moon" in Genesis 37:9 from theHebrew as "YAREACH#3394". This shows a clear attempt at corrupting a word to

make it appear to be a different word and not lead a person to see a connection

between YAHREAHthe moon god and the guess name YAHWEH! Anyone with

a keen eye can see that YA-REAH and YAH-WEH are identical except for the

slight "r" sound twisted into a "W"! What do we have here? We have a solid

proof that the name of the ancient name of the moon god is the same name now said

to be the true name of God. YAHWEH and its tetragrammaton YHWH or YHVH

is not the name of the true God but the name of the moon god! The Jews have

perverted the name of God and replaced it with the name of the moon god!

What is a Yahwist? They are all moon god worshipers! A Yahweh believer is any person who

believes YHWH (the tetragrammaton name of Baal) pronounced Yahweh, is the name of God.

Yahweh is a guess name and is NOT THE NAME OF THE TRUE GOD. Yahweh as it is spelled

IS NOT A HEBREW NAME for God!

Many Yahwist who blaspheme the name of Jesus have lied to gain access to this page. They

have clicked the OK button confessing faith in and belief in the name of Jesus, then they have

written me horrible hate-rant emails showing they lied to gain entry. Not only are Yahwist

master deceivers, they are all of them LIARS! That is why I am so adamant against this new

breed of Concision antichrist who are trying to deceive Jesus Name people and wreck Jesusname Churches. Everyone who clicks OK to enter this page is required to confess faith in the

name of Jesus for salvation to read this study.


3/39

My first presentation of a rebuttal against the Concision Yahwist in 1995 was academic but

their hate rants (some threatened to kill me), made it important to treat these no longer as

innocent deceived people but as apostates who have all intentions of blotting out the name of

Jesus from the earth. I will treat these devils and their doctrine (1Timothy 4:1) whose mouths

must be stopped, as instructed, and rebuke them before all (Titus 1:11-13). If a man or woman

personally attack me I will deal with them separately accordingly depending if they can be

saved. If they are already reprobates I will not spend time on firewood for hell. If you have been

rebaptized in the name of Yahweh or Yahshua and had the name of Jesus washed off of you,then you are a lost idiot. You can never be saved again. Your stupidity will cost you your soul.

The only hope you may have, if there is any mercy, is to come out from that heresy, renounce it,

be rebapized, and then begin to fight against that heresy. If you draw back into the perdition of

these ungodly men, there is no hope for your soul. You have no hope except to blaspheme the

name of Jesus and go on to a devil's hell. If you have lied to get into this page, then you must

confess again right here that you beleive in the name of Jesus as the ONLY saving name (Acts

4:12). If you do not, click the back button and get off this page.

This study attacks no man or woman and addresses only some of the issues. If you are a

Yahwist (YHWH) and lied to read it, you will become angry at me but also you will have a spirit

of judgment and fear come upon your soul revealing that you are damned.

This is not written to convert Yahwist, they are already damned who have recanted and denied

the name of Jesus. There is no salvation for them ONLY UTTER reprobation and continued

delusions. For those who have stood for Truth, who are subject to a good Apostolic Pastor, and

who love the name of Jesus, this study is for you.

Is the name of Jesus a fraud? Some claim that it is!

Is the name of Jesus

just a made-up namesomeone configured

and stuck on the

Messiah? Is the name

of Jesus a Latin and

English form of the

Greek Zeus (g-zeus)?

Is the name of Jesus

derived from the name

of a fish named Zeus?

Does the name of

Jesus mean "pigGod?" If a person

prays in the name of

Jesus are they praying

to a pig? Is the true

Jewish name of Jesus

pronounced Yahshua?

Yahwist say yes to all

these and have

invented these hate

rants against the name

of Jesus. The TRUE

answer to all these

questions is NO!


4/39

Yahwist have been blaspheming the name of Jesus now since around 1567 when Genebrardus

invented the guess name "Iahve, Jahve" (Chronographia, Paris, 1567 (ed. Paris, 1600, p. 79

seq). How did Genebrardus invent this new guess name? Actually he borrowed from Clement

of Alexandria (a Platoist Gnostic early Catholic) the Greek spelling IAOVE (Zeus), which is

universally known as JOVE (Roman Jupiter), and converted JAOVE to YAOVE adding the H

and dropping the O, hence YAHVE! Yahve then is none other than Zeus or Jupiter!

For acceptance of his new invention and to support his new guess name, he went to theSamaritians (enemies of God and Israel) and borrowed IABE from their Bible. This he

converted to YABE and finally converting the B to a V he arrived at YAVE, adding the H, since

this letter is silent he fabricated YAHVE. He felt secure Yah was correct since this appeared in

Psalms 68:4 as Iah. He was unaware that Iah was a pregnant pagan Egyptian falsehood

replacing the original Ieh (Yeh or Jeh) as first given by Moses and incorporated in the new

name he gave to Oshea. It was after the death of Genebrardus that other Yahwist dropped the

letter V and a double U (UU) or as now a W was added forming YAHWEH. This hybrid rival

name was proposed as the name of God, claiming that Iehovah or Jehovah as found in the

Masoretic text was false. Those who have adopted this Gnostic-Greek-Samaritian YAHVE

guess name, claim the name of Jesus is the name of a pig God and blaspheme the worthy name

of our Messiah.

I make no apology, the tetragrammaton is a FRAUD! The guess name Yahweh is a Samaritan

hoax developed modernly by Genebrardus! The

fabricated name Yahshua is a falsehood! I will stand

against all Jews and Gentiles, scholars and idiots, who

claim otherwise. I am set in defense of the name of Jesus

Messiah (Christ). The guess name YAHWEH is a modern

FRAUD! It is NOT THE HEBREW NAME OF GOD! It

is the name of a demon at least and the name of a false

god at most. The fabricated name YAHSHUA is a

FRAUD! This fraud is not found in any ancientmanuscript of any language. Talk about a made-up

name glued to the Messiah, this is the guilty name!

If you deny the name of Jesus, recant that glorious name,

then be afraid for your soul will be damned! Most that I

have witnessed who have gone into this apostasy have the

characteristic of being stubborn and rebellious people.

Most have a history of being disloyal to several Pastors.

All of them have been trouble makers and have refused

to be subject to authority placed in the ministry of a true

Man of God (Hebrews 13:17). These roving, church-hopping, disgruntled reprobates, always in some false

doctrine, are easy candidates for this heresy. They are

those the Scriptures say: DECEIVING AND BEING


5/39

DECEIVED! This study on the Sacred Name of God is to give glory to the name of Jesus. It is

to give the Apostolic Messianic people a view into the truths of God that will attest to the name

that is above every name, that at the name of Jesus EVERY knee shall bow and EVERY tongue

shall confess.

It is time for all Jesus Name Believers, Pastors, Churches, and Organizations, to stand forth and

lift up the name of Jesus. It is time for Apostolic writers to begin exposing the falsehood of the

tetragrammaton and all guess names associated with it.

A look at the Alphabets

In the chart on the left, we compare the main branches of the early Greek character compared

with the North Semitic alphabet and the classic Greek. 1=North Semitic alphabet (Paleo-

Hebrew); 2=Earliest Greek character (9th-6th centuries BC; 4-5 Eastern branch (4. Ionic; 5.

Attic); 7=Western branch; 9=Classic Greek; 10=Names of the letters (those in parentheses;

names of letters now discarded in classic Greek.

Notice that in Paleo-Hebrew and Greek that they both agree as to order of the alphabet, theyboth have basically the same appearance with little difference; they both have the same basic

pronunciation of the letters, and both Paleo-Hebrew and Greek are in the same family of some

older ancient language from which they descend. To translate Paleo-Hebrew then into Greek is

not to miss very much in the way of pronunciation and or meaning associated with word forms.

Also we can see that the ancient Paleo-Hebrew did have vowel useage. A common lie by

scholars is the ancient Hebew did not have vowels and then they show us the Aramaic alphabet!

Notice in the coin below the vowels "e and u" are

used!

Paleo-Hebrew and Greek are in fact nearly the same

language and tongue. Historically the Greek speakerswho came among those we call Greek, brought a new

tongue replacing the older tongue. This is believed by

many philologist to have occured around 1450BC, the

same time the Hebrews departed from Egypt. What if

any connection is unknown except that the Hyskos

and the Philistines may have been the same people

and these may in turn have become Cretians and then

also later Greeks. It is a fact if we read the Old

Testament carefully, that the Jews and the Philistines

spoke the same language. We would then expect them

to have the same alphabet.

Some think we have lost ancient Paleo-Hebrew completely but the truth is we may have it

nearly exactly in the Greek tongue. This may answer why it pleased our God to have so many

New Testament books written in Greek, since the Babylonian Aramaic was not Hebrew. The

point here, is that Yahwist make a big case for pronunciation of the name of Jesus and the name

of God in Hebrew which they mean Aramaic, and these ridicule Greek as a pagan and profane

tongue. This chart shows these are liars and deceivers. The next chart below shows how vowels

were in the ancient text but removed in the Masoretic and Aramaic text. The perversion of

removing the vowels and then claiming that the ancient Paleo-Hebrew had no vowels is a great

falsehood.


6/39

I will be straight forward here. The four lettered

tetragrammatons YHWH or YHVH or any other

four letters such as (IHVH or JHWH), are found

deeply connected with sorcery and witchcraft. To

the left is a card from the witchcraft deck of tarot.

The four letters of the tetragrammaton are spaced

between each letter spelling tarot. Read the letters

clockwise you have tarot. Read them backward andyou find "Tora" an abbreviation of "Torah." Those

who believe in the four letter tetragrammaton

believe that all the Law of God may be found

reduced to the four letters YHWH. In a link below

what the Yahweh's believe, this will be dislcosed. The

four lettered tetragrammaton is "NOT" God's

sacred name and all of God's truth and laws are

"NOT" found in the letters YHWH. I deem the

tetragrammaton YHWH to be profane, and having

come from a satanic source, was grafted into

Judaism by witchcraft priest and mystic BabylonianKabbalist!

Here is proof that the Yahweh's believe in witchcraft

and use the witchcraft deck of Tarot in teaching the

tetragrammaton and that the name of Yahweh is

valid.

And, look to the left at the card. Who is that red

figure upon whom the whole revolving system of Tarot, Tora, YHWH, and knowledge rest or

sabbaths, but the ole devil himself. Opposite the red devil is his other form of the serpent, the

form and figure through which he deceives the world. The Egyptian witch of mysticism sitsupon the circle as the revealer and protector (sword) of the mystic name of Yah.

My claims and statements are against many scholars and sacred high chairs of learning, which I

have found to be the blind leaders of the blind. To long the herd instinct has taken over the

Christian mind and many no longer "prove" anything if it comes to them from some supposed

learned scholar. Many of these alleged scholars are members of secret orders and mystic cult

organizations, trying to peddle their paganized heresies by infusing them into the theologies and

doctrines of the Church.

The tegragrammaton YHWH NEVERappeared in the original autograph book of the Law atany time. These letters were forged and placed in the scrolls centuries later by Babylonian

occult scribes who intended that ADONAI, Ehyeh, and Yeh, should be replaced by those four

letters and the mystic pronunciation of them. These scribes of hell then perverted the scripture

to make their secret occult name an ineffable name among those not initiated into the cult.
http://jesus-messiah.com/apologetics/cults/Tarot10.htmhttp://jesus-messiah.com/apologetics/cults/Tarot10.htm


7/39

There is absolutely NO PROOF that the tetragrammation was ever in the text of Scriptures

prior to the Babylonian captivity and up to the the time of Malachi. And when we find it

supposedly there, as in the dead sea scrolls we discover that it is there hundreds of years later

by fraud. We will examine one such case later.

EHYEH The True Name God Revealed To Moses

What is the true sacred name of God? How does it apply or fit into the name of Jesus? We willlook first for the answer in the famous account of the burning bush in Exodus 3:13-14.

"At the burning bush Moses says to God: "When I come to the Israelites and say to them, the

God of your fathers has sent me to you, and they ask me, What is His Name?; what shall I say to

them?" God answered: "Ehyeh-asher-ehyeh." Thus you shall say to the Israelites, "Ehyeh sent

me to you." The three-word name God gives Himself is not easy to translate. The most precise

rendering is 'I shall be what I shall be', although it sometimes is translated as 'I am that I am'.

The 1962 Jewish Publication Society translation of the Torah despaired of coming up with an

accurate rendition, and just left the words in their Hebrew original" (Jewish Literacy, pp. 47-48).

Here is the transliterated version Exodus 3:14 from the Hebrew Bible:

V'yomer Eloyim el-Mosheh eh'yeh asher eh'yeh v'yomer ko tomar livneh Yisrael eh'yeh

sh'lachni alechem.

Here is the way it should read in all English Bibles:

"(13). And Moses said unto God, Behold, when I come unto the children of Israel, and shall say

unto them, The God of your fathers hath sent me unto you; and they shall say unto me, What is

his name? what shall I say unto them?

(14). And God said unto Moses,EHYEHasherEHYEH: and He said, Thus shalt thou say untothe children of Israel,EHYEHhath sent me unto you "

What name was Moses to use? It was the sacred name "EHYEH."

"Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, EHYEH hath sent me unto you."

Anyone, Jew or Gentile, who claims that the sacred name given to Moses at the burning bush

was YHWH, Yahawah, Yahwah, Yahweh, Yihwah, Yahshua, or any other "Yah" name are

liars! Anyone who says that Moses went down and said "I AM" sent me are also liars!

The Egyptian word for I AM is "nuk." If Moses went back and told them I AM sentme he would have said "Nuk" sent me. "Nuk" then would have been a name for God.

Something not found in your Bible anywhere.

The letters "I AM" do not form a name. I AM was placed in the text and EHYEH removed. In

fact, EHYEH has been removed from the text in hundreds if not thousand's of places. I AM is

the "perfect present tense" of the name EHYEH. Since when do we replace someone's name

with the "tense" of their name when used as a verb?

Many claim that EHYEH and its replacement I AM should be interpreted in a future tense as:

"I will be that I will be (J. H. Hertz, The Pentateuch And Haftorahs,p 215); I will be what

tomorrow demands (W. Gunther Plaut, The Haftartah Commentary, p. 405); I will be what Iwant to be (S.R. Hirsh from Plaut, p. 405).


8/39

All efforts to make EHYEH mean: "I will be," "He will be," "He who causes to be" or "He

shall cause it to come to pass," are all future tense which does not exist in the Hebrew language

(seeRobert Young's Bible Lexicon, p. 38; Hastings Dictionary of the Bible, Extra Volume, p.

626; and Canon S.R. Driver, Westminister Commentary, Genesis, p. 408).

The point is, that the name EHYEH should have remained in the text and not replace it with I

AM to designate the tense or meaing of that sacred name.

Ancient Paleo-Hebrew is not a sacred or holy language.

The claim that ancient Hebrew is a sacred and holy language is false. Every doctrine built upon

that false premise is false. The idea or claim that a name for God spoken in Hebrew makes that

name holy because it was spoken in Hebrew is false. Anyone who claims then that God's

name(s) must be spoken in Hebrew for it/them to be acceptable, is making a false statement.

The objection that the Israelites did not speak Egyptian but the sacred language of Paleo-

Hebrew is not true. Paleo-Hebrew is a homogenized language consisting of several other

language phonetics and meanings. The Israelites did not adopt the Paleo-Phoenician language

until many centuries after leaving Egypt, sometime between 1100-900BC.

Before there was a written language, words and names were usually monosyllable. By adding

one monosyllable to another compound word forms were created. Transferring these ideas and

word sounds into a written form was the beginning of a pictorial writing system. These glyphs

or images whether they were the wedge type strokes found in the cunniform style or the figures

found in the Egyptian language, stood for pronunciation of word forms. As this relates to the

sacred names of God, there is absolutly no way with perfect certainty, that we can say how

God's names were anciently pronounced. At the dispersion of the nations at the tower of Babel,

and the instant creation by God of multiple languages, there had to come into existence at the

same time different words to describe the same God. The idea that there exist one single

pronunciation for the name(s) of God is just absolutely false. The idea that the name(s) of God

must be spoken in the Paleo-Hebrew or in the Babylonian Aramaic tongue, for it (or them) to be

holy and sacred is also false.

The original language of Adam was different than the Ugaritic language of Abraham. The

Ugaritic language of Abraham was different than the Egyptian language of Moses and the

Israelites in Egypt. The Phoenician language adopted by the Israelites 600 years after they came

into the promised land is not the language of Adam, Abraham, or that of Moses. And finally,

although there is a great affinity of Paleo-Hebrew to Aramaic, these are different languages.

God spoke in each language and in each one described himself by names and titles. We have noproof or evidence that God insisted upon one continious pronounciation for his names or titles

and these names and titles were the same in all languages. If the evidence of such a fact of proof

is missing, how can any man claim something to which God gave or left no testimony? Either

the claim is false on the face of the assertion, or it is false because a claim so important if it were

true, would have an abundance of testimony, and none exist!

At the tower of Babel, nine men could point toward heaven at the same time. One would utter

"El"; another would utter "Neter"; another would utter "Theos"; another would utter "Deus";

another would say "Adonai"; another would say "Neb"; another would say "Moryo"; another

would say "Kurios"; and yet another say "Dominus." All were speaking of the same being,

...the same God, the same LORD. It is when these names and titles are stolen by the profaneand used to designate their gods that these carry a stigma of rebuke and shame.


9/39

In the chart below, it can be seen that many Phoenician words descend from both Egyptian and

Proto-Canaanite. Hebrew as a separate sacred language back to Adam is a myth. The entire

Kabbalistic scheme of mysticism based upon Hebrew letters and associated gematria is a clever

fraud. Hebrew as a language spoken by the Israelites in Egypt is a myth. Hebrew is not a

"pure" language that came from God to the Jews. Ancient Paleo-Hebrew is nothing but the

Phoenician language with roots of Egyptian, Ugaritic, and Proto-Canaanite words and

phonetics.

You will learn shortly that

"Yah" was an Egyptian moon

god. Why would God tell

Moses to tell the Israelites the

moon god sent him? God did

not give or speak the

tetragrammaton at the burning

bush. Anyone who claims that

the sacred name is "YHVH" or

"YHWH" in this text and then

make this into "Yahweh,""Yahuweh," "Yahshua," or

"Jehovah" are liars. They

may be educated liars,

ignorant liars, or stupid liars,

but still liars. I am making this

bold and straight-forward statement because the Yahwist and their lying demonic false

prophets have purposely perverted the Word of God to insert their guess names for the purpose

of later recanting and denying that the name of "Jesus" is a valid and correct name in the

English language of the Saviour. If you love and believe in the name of Jesus you will not find

my remarks offensive, but if you deny the name of Jesus and you are reading this, you are a liar

anyway for clicking ok to come here where you are not welcome. The information on this page

is for those who love the name of Jesus. If you are reading this and you lied to get in here, then

take a warning. What you are about to read as you sit there a confessed liar will show you, you

have damned your soul. You cannot be saved. It would be better for you to click and get out of

here.

What is the sacred name revealed to Moses at the burning bush? It is EHYEH! And what

name was Moses supposed to pronounce when he told the Israelites the name of the God who

sent him was EHYEH, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob? And what is then God's

memorial name of deliverance from Egyptian bondage? It is EHYEH!

(15). And God said moreover unto Moses, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, The

Lord (Adonai) God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, hath sent me unto

you: this (or "EHYEH") is my name forever, and this is my memorial unto all generations.

(KJV EXO 3:13-15 with Hebrew emphasis).

God himself spoke three name-words to describe himself: God or Elohim; Lord God or

ADONAI Elohim, and Ehyeh. God NEVER gave to Moses the tetragrammaton here or

anywhere else in the Bible.

Any effort to change the word ADONAI/LORD in this text to "YHVH or YHWH" and then

insert either "Yahweh, Yahshua, or Jehovah" is false. You are a pervert if you do it and youwill go to hell for adding unto the word of God:


10/39

"Ye shall not add unto the word which I commanded you, neither shall ye diminish ought from

it, that ye may keep the commandments of ADONAI your Elohim (the LORD your God) which

I commanded you" (Deut. 4:2).

The words "LORD GOD" here in their original Hebrew is "ADONAI Elohim." This "Adonai

Elohim" was the name or titles by which God was address prior to Moses. Any effort to

corrupt "Adonai" and make it into the tetragrammaton YHVH or YHWH is false. It is done

falsely so that they may deny that the name EHYEH which God sent Moses down into Egyptwith, is altered into "YAHWEH, YAHSHUA, or JEHOVAH." This is a sin and a grevious

distortion of the Word of God! ADONAI in all caps signifies God as LORD and in the

translation LORD is all CAPS because ADONAI was all CAPS for distinction! When a person

calls God LORD or ADONAI they are saying: 1.) There is none greater; 2.) There is no greater

Sovereign; 3.) He alone has power over the supplicant; 4.) and the person is confessing full and

total obedience and honor! To take ADONAI and translate this as LORD and then pervert

LORD into YHWH and then into the guess name Yahweh, is falsehood!

What did God call himself at the burning bush? He said "EHYEH asher EHYEH." This is

said to mean "I AM that I AM. Why? Because in the Hebrew there is to future tense there is

only past and present. To make EHYEH asher EHYEH to mean "I will be what I will be" is afuturistic statement and is false. We do not know what EHYEH asher EHYEH means other

than how it is incorporated into the name of Jesus. And in that name it means "God is salvation

or God has become salvation" (both present tense).

If you are a believer in the fraud interpolated into the text above that the name of God is YHVH

or YHWH and make these to mean "Yahweh, Yahshua, or Jehovah" then read no further. You

are unworthy of what follows. If you have already recanted the name of Jesus and claim it

comes from Zeus and or Latin and means pig-god, THEN GET OFF THIS PAGE. GET OUT

OF HERE! YOU ARE NOT WANTED! REPROBATES ARE NOT MINISTERED TO

HERE! I say this because Yahweh blasphemers have sent me all sorts of hateful, degrading,

and blasphemous emails. I have had to revise this study to rebuke these reprobate gainsayers.

And I do not feel the slight bit of remorse in rebuking them!

For those who love the name of Jesus Christ you may continue this study. The sacred name

given to Moses at the burning bush was EHYEH asher EHYEH. Read now and be blessed.

Ehyeh Asher Ehyeh

Moses

The name "Moses" strikes us as the identity of one of the greatest men in ancient monotheistic

history. His name is known by little children in the story of the mother and father who hid their

little son to keep the wicked Pharoah from having him aborted, ...killed at birth. They hid him

in the flags (bulrushes). Now the name flags is another name for papyrus pap-yrus (pap-irus)

with the "us" having some connection with that which grows in water.

As can be seen to the left, the Egyptian word for water is "mu." And when the daughter

of Pharoah took Moses out of the water she called him in the Egyptian language

"MOUSES" or as later Grecianized "Moseus" and finally as "Moses." We are told byancient authorities that the name Moses means just as I have described with "Mo"

meaning "water" and "Uses" meaning he who is saved by water. Moseus is more

accurately Museus when we convert the Mo back to Mu. If we drop the "M" and replace this


11/39

with a "J" we would have Juseus and this is remarkable since Moses prophecied that another

would come like unto him and he the people were to follow or be destroyed. We can see that

"Mo" is accurately taken from the Egyptian "mu" and we shall make all the authorities who

claim expertise in ancient linguistics to deny that "uses" is the correct ancient articulation of

"ses or sus." I will here quote one of the recognized ancient authorities on the antiquity of the

Jews:

"Hereupon it was that Thermuthis (Pharoah's daughter) imposed this nameMouses upon him,from what had happened when he was put into the river;for the Egyptians call water by the

name of Mo, and such as are saved out of it, by the name of Uses: so by putting these two words

together, they imposed this name upon him. And he was, by the confession of all, according to

God's prediction, as well for his greatness of mind as for his contempt of difficulties, the best of

all the Hebrews, for Abraham was his ancestor of the seventh generation" (Josephus,

Antiquities, Book II, Chapter 9, Paragraph 6).

It it obvious to any person of rational mind that we have here a great testimony to the name of

Jesus that it did not derive from the name of any pagan god but its parts and its meaning come

from a far ancient antiquity. When it is properly understood that "Je" is the abbreviation of

"YEH" or "JEH" the sacred name of God at the burning bush, and that "Uses or Usus" (theseare the same), we have in the name of Jesus a very powerful new identity as the "GOD WHO

SAVES BY WATER." So the name of Jesus in a shortened meaning would be simply Saviour!

In the very name of Jesus we have the authority of our New Testament water baptism in the

name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins (Acts 2:38).

When any apostate comes saying they have proof that the name of Jesus comes from Zeus or

Iesa or some other false god or goddess, they are spreading lies and hate against the name of our

Great Saviour. These apostates who have recanted the name of Jesus claiming it is a false name

must repent and do their first works over or perish. And if they refuse to repent, then they will

be damned! Any apostate who has called the name of Jesus the "pig god" name and or has

confessed or taught that it comes from the Latin word for pig, is damned! If you deny the name

of Jesus you will be denied in heaven. The name of Moses in its ancient antiquity is so

connected to the name of Jesus that anyone who can receive the revelation will now know why

Moses added "Yeh" or "Jeh" to the name of Oshea and thus signify that when the Messiah

came he would be the one who God would raise up and to him would the people gather. It

would not be Mouses who would save them this time but Jehuses (Jesus-pronounced the same).

And whosoever received not this prophet would be destroyed from among the people (Acts

3:22-23). It is not enough that you receive the person of the Saviour, YOU MUST BELIEVE

UPON AND RECEIVE HIS NAME! And that name is "Jesus!" If you know not the revelation

of that name YOU CANNOT BELIEVE UPON IT! If you BELIEVE UPON IT and do not

know the revelation of it, you can still be saved!

Iah or Yah

Yah is not the name of God I do not care if it is in Psalms 68:4 as Jah. David did not write

Chapter 68. It was written many years after David and perhaps after the return from the exile.

Verse 29 speaks of the Temple, something not built until after David's death.

In Psalms 68:4, Jah is said to "ride upon the heavens." This language is spoke after the manner

of the moon and the sun which are said to ride across the heavens in their daily circuit. We are

unsure how this corruption came into the Word of God but it is not verified in any other text of

Scripture. This text is not a revelation text. If the name is to be authentic then it MUST becorrected to "JEH" as Moses fixed this very name to Oshea in Numbers 13:16. In no manner of

form can "Jah" be a correct name form. All the ridiculous modifications using second and

third person plural corruptions cannot be used to validate this error. God, whose name is


12/39

"JEH" when fixed to the name of Oshea can never be made into the Egyptian moon god whose

name was "Iah or Yah" which many Yahwist claim is the correct rendering of "Jah."

There are other false words put into the Bible to deceive and to substitute truth with falsehood.

Even the name of Moses is different than that which it was in the original. Modern forms of

the name of Moses further detach and remove it from any connection or identity with its

ancient pronunciation. The pagan name of "Yah" is the Egyptian moon god and all the Jewish

scribes and Law-keeping reprobates will never overcome that fact.

While many think the name "Iah or Yah" is a sacred name for the true God, the history of it

goes back to Egypt. It is not the name of God and it is not an abbreviation of the alleged name

Yahweh. We will provide more on this in the links below:

"Yah" is the Egyptian moon god and "Shu(a)" is the Egyptian sky god:http://www.ancient-

egypt.org/

Yah is also the goat god with whom also is associated

the moon.There is now available a great amount of

information on Yah, Yahweh, Jehovah, Yahshua, andmany other false names being used for God and Jesus.

Do not be deceived by the modern law-keepers and

sacred-name Hebrew-roots movements that are full of heresy and who deny the Lord Jesus

Christ.

"Yah" is the Egyptian name of Toth as the moon god. And "Shu" is the Egyptian sky god of the

heavens. Scroll down the link above until you come to the subject title "The Lunar God." There

you will find the name of the moon god as "Iah" which is the same as "Yah." When you glue

Yah & Shu together to form "Yahshua" you have an Egyptian moon god as the sky or heaven

god. I am shocked and amazed that such names are given to Jesus Messiah without regard to a

shred of research. The name of Jesus is not "Yahshu or Yahshua" and I condemn all who use it

for the Saviour!

Ehyeh

The sacred name "Ehyeh" (pronounced i-jeh, ieh, or as in the KJV iah or "i-ah") is the first

person singular name of God. It is to be specifically understood that the letters "iah" that are

attached to names in the Old Testament is an INCORRECT articulation of the sacred name

EHYEH, EH=i and YEH=ah to form "iah." The letters "iah" do not stand alone as the letters

of a different pronunciation for a different name like "Yah." Ehyeh is not contracted to form

"Yah" therefore "iah" as the articulation of EHYEH is correct. Rather then putting falsephonetics to EHYEH as "iah" the translators and scholars should have retained "ieh" or "Jeh"

corrrectly from EHYEH!

Ehyeh is the first person singular ancient name of God first revealed to Moses at the burning

bush. Prior to that time this name was not known or revealed (Exodus 6:3 where the

tetragrammaton and "Jehovah" are interpolated incorrectly).

The three names by which God was known before this sacred name was revealed were "Elohim

(God), Adonai (LORD), and Elshaddai (God Almighty). The Supreme being is called God,

LORD God, and Elshaddai or Almighty God. At the burning bush a new covenant name was

revealed. That name is EHYEH! Ehyeh is translated for its meaning "I AM that I AM" ratherthan the true name being in translations. Then I AM that I AM is further interpreted to mean

"self existent, or the eternal one." Lying Yahwist remove I AM that I AM and interpolate the

tetragrammatons "YHVH or YHWH" and make this into "Yahweh, Yahuweh, Yahshua, and
http://www.ancient-egypt.org/http://www.ancient-egypt.org/http://www.ancient-egypt.org/http://www.ancient-egypt.org/http://www.ancient-egypt.org/glossary/religion/thot.htmlhttp://www.ancient-egypt.org/glossary/religion/thot.htmlhttp://www.ancient-egypt.org/http://www.ancient-egypt.org/http://www.ancient-egypt.org/glossary/religion/thot.htmlhttp://www.ancient-egypt.org/glossary/religion/thot.html


13/39

Jehovah". They totally ignore the sacred name of "HYH" or "Ehyeh" with its proper vowels,

because the true sacred name of God plays no role in the fraud and confusion they will

afterward bring upon the name of God.

"And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, by the name of God Almighty

(Elshaddai), but by my name EHYEH I was not known unto them" (BJV EXO 6:3).

Some claim this scripture is a question and God was telling Moses that Abraham, Isaac, andJacob knew Him as EHYEH! Some claim that EHYEH here should be changed to YHWH or

JHVH and that this means Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob knew and pronounced the names

"Yahweh or Jehovah." This is false! Why would God say he appeared to them as Elshaddai if

he had appeared to them as Yahweh or Jehovah? God said he appeared as Elshaddi and said

he WAS NOT KNOWN by the name Moses had just received. This text is not a question. It is a

declarativestatement attesting that Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob had not known God by the new

name Moses had just received.

Now some claim that the sacred name of "EHYEH" or in the Yahwist cases "Yahweh" or some

other guess name like Jehovah, was known by Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. This begs the

question then why God said he appeared unto them by the name of God Almighty (Elshaddai inHebrew)? Why did God not skip this "God Almighty" name of ELSHADDAI stuff and just say

he was known to them by the name of Yahweh, Jehovah, Yahshua, or some one of the other

guess names? He did not because he had not revealed his new Covenant sacred name to them.

Why did he say he appeared unto them by the name ofElshaddai if he had in fact already

revealed the alleged names "Yahweh, Jehovah, or Yahshua" unto them? He did not because

prior to the burning bush the sacred name of "Ehyeh" had NOT BEEN REVEALED to

Abraham, Isaac, or Jacob. And, no one knew him as Jehovah, Yahweh, or Yahshua. In fact the

sacred name "Ehyeh" was not known by anyone all the way back to Adam.

I know right well of the claim by Yahwist of the interpolation of the word "ADONAI/LORD"

into the text beginning in Genesis 2 and afterward, that some claim was placed in the scripture

to remove YHWH. They claim YHWH was in the original text and have subsequently removed

ADONAI/LORD and inserted Yahweh in an attempt to correct the the alleged interpolations.

Then, with the YHWH interpolated in the place of ADONAI/LORD they turn and use these

alleged corrected evidences in an attempt to prove that Moses DID NOT receive the sacred

name EHYEH in Exodus 3:14 for the first time. They go back to Genesis 2 and claim it was

known there. Such interpolations and subsequent manipulations are fraud and fraud

compounded. The fact is that Abraham called God "my Lord" or "my Adonai" (Strongs #113

& #136). If the word "Lord" appears in the sacred text prior to the encounter of Moses with

God at the burning bush and the revelation of Ehyeh as the progressive revelation of his name,

then "Lord" should be translated from "Adonai" and its rood "Adown" and NOT removed."LORD" (in all caps), placed in the text where Adonai existed and later replaced by the

tetragrammaton and at last corrected by the Yahwist to insert "Yahweh" is a FRAUD!

LORD:

Some are making a lot of false statements that the Old Testament "LORD" is a pagan name

that comes from BAAL because "Baal" also has the usurped meaning of being "master or

lord". Let's not be to eager to make accusations and tend to be a little stupid here. When

Nimrod usurped for himself a throne and began a kingdom line disconnected to the true

genealogical line from Adam to Jesus Messiah, he by nature usurped the titles "master and

lord" as a god manifest (Nimrod Ephipanes). Sarah called Abraham "lord" but she did notmean by it that he was a God, nor did Abraham usurp to himself some theory he was a God.

The theft by Nimrod of the titles used by the Patriarchs in honor and worship of God does not

give Nimrod exclusive rights to these identities. He stole them from God and made himself a


14/39

god. Do we say that the word "Elohim" is a pagan name because it is used inappropriately by

pagans and attributed to idols, angels, and men, etc.? No we do not. So, ok, lay off the

accusations and let's deal in facts and honor to our God.

The names of many men ended or began with "baal (ba-al)" to signify "lord" in the sense of

"master and owner and even king" (Strongs #1167 see also Genesis 36:38 for an example). If

these titles were not used to usurp away from God his worship, and if they are not used to usurp

for a person some idea he was a god, then the use of the titles are not evil or criminal. Godcertainly made no protest through the prophets for use of these titles in a correct manner. In

the Hebrew Scriptures the true God of Israel is identified as Israel's ba-al! In Isaiah 54:5, the

prophet declares: "For your Maker is your husband (Hebrew, ba-al) the LORD of hosts is His

name." Also in Jeremiah 31:32 we find: "I was a husband (Hebrew ba-al) to them, says the

LORD."

In Genesis 20:3 Abraham is called "ba-al"; in Exo 21:22 husband is called "ba-al"; in Exo

21:29 an owner of an ox is called a "ba-al"; in Exo 22:8 a master of a house is called "ba-al"; in

Lev 21:4 a chief man is called "ba-al"; in Judges 9:2,3,6,7,18,20,23,24,25,26,46,47, the men of

Shechem are all called "ba-al"; in 1Sam 23:2 David calls the men of Keilah "ba-al"; in Esther

1:17 husbands are called "ba-al"; in Proverbs 1:19 owners are called "ba-al"; in Isaiah 16:8Lords of the heathen are called "ba-al"; in Jer 3:20 husband is called "ba-al"; in Jer 37:13

captain is the word "ba-al"; and in Joel 1:8 husband is called "ba-al". All these instances

illustrate that different men in different times understood the word "ba-al" not to have a pagan

or idolatrous meaning. It is when this word is applied to a pagan god and the pagan god

replaces the true God and the word Baal is used to identify a false god as God that the word

becomes misused.

The sacred-name sects and cults not only want to destroy and blot out the name of Jesus from

the earth, they also claim that the word "God" is pagan and the words "Lord or Adonai" are

also pagan. Some of these cult groups also reject "Elohim" as the name of a pagan god and

substitute instead of God, "mighty one." This of course offers no escape because such was also

used for pagan gods.

God himself spoke to the Prophets and claimed he was God, Elohim, and Adonai. If God has no

problem using these titles for himself, why should we follow some sacred-name cult leader who

now wants to correct not only the Word of God which he is not qualified to do, but he is going to

CORRECT GOD HIMSELF!

It is when man elevates himself up to a god or uses the titles attributed to God for idols, and

uses these titles to deceive others, that he has committed the sins of the devil. So, when the Jews

attributed to Nimrod the title of Baal as a god and gave the same qualities they attributed toGod to Nimrod, this was wrong and sin. To say that the title LORD is an exclusive name for

only Baal, is error. To say LORD is a replacement of the tetragrammaton is also error.

Abraham called God "ADONAI" (LORD) in Genesis 18:3 and then knew God only as

Elshaddai (ADONAI Elshaddai; Lord God Almighty; found four times in the book of

Revelation). LORD in all capitals signifies only honor to God and the most high God who is

LORD! LORD in nearly all the 5,000 places where it is found is ADONAI and it other places it

is the substitute for the sacred name EHYEH! It is wrong and a sin to lead the unlearned to

blaspheme against the name of Jesus by giving them false information. We are not to give or

attribute the glorious titles of God to idols. I would lay the charge against the Yahwist that they

have done just that. They have given names and titles of the true God over to the pagans to be

used by the pagans exclusively for their pagan gods and idols. They now want to say in atwisted way that the name Jesus is really Zeus therefore the name of Zeus is really Jesus. This

is a blasphemous falsehood. They then dare anyone to attribute to the true God what they have

given to the pagans.


15/39

The Jews removed the name of Nimrod from the text of the scrolls and left remaining only his

usurped title as "lord" and translated this as "Baal." They are so dumb, to have left the names

of the other two of that Babylonian trinity, namely "Ashtoreth and Tammuz." It is no great

thing then to reconstruct that "Baal" is Nimrod, the husband-god of Ashtoreth and the alleged

father of the god Tammuz (the first trinity). Why is it that so many want to correct errors in

text and this one slips by all the translators and the pundits? That some Jews did attribute

God's titles to idols does not mean we are forbidden to use these titles correctly in worship of

the true God. God is LORD because he said the heavens and the earth are his (EXO 9:29; PSA24:1; 1COR 10:26).

Kurios:

Some make the claim that the word "LORD" is also a Greek word and is foreign to the Hebrew

language. This is false. The fact is that the word "LORD" is a Hebrew word and comes from

the Hebrew word "ADOWN" (Strongs #113 & 136 a king or sovereign) from which comes

"ADONAI" which is a Hebrew word translated into the Septuagint Greek version of the Old

Testament became "Kurios" and both are CORRECTLY translated "LORD" and this refers to

kingship or sovereignty. It was Jews in 280BC, 307 years before the day of Pentecost, who

translated the name ADONAI into Greek as Kurios. The Apostles did not do this! They usedthe same translation of words that were used 307years before them. When Jesus quoted the

Septuagint he did not say "Yahweh or Jehovah" in the text were the word "Kurios or in

English Lord" is now used. In saying the word LORD is a correct translation of the Greek

Kurios, we are saying that the word "LORD" is a substitute name of God replacing ADONAI.

It is not correct to substitute ADONAI or LORD with the interpolated YHWH or JHVH which

is done in every Yahwist Bible ever fabricated. The name ADONAI when used of God is a

name. When used of man it is a title like Father. In may hundreds of places it is a substitute

word REPLACING the ancient sacred name EHYEH which the Jews at once time considered to

be the ineffable and unutterable name of God. But they replaced this SACRED NAME with a

substitute. They capitalized LORD from "ADONAI" to designate the one true God from other

gods who were called lord. We do know that every time they came to the HYH "Ehyeh" they

would pronounce ADONAI. This was not just a habit or a fill-in to keep from saying some

other secret hidden name. For the record: The holy name LORD is ADONAI in Hebrew; the

holy name ADONAI is MORYO in Aramaic; the holy name ADONAI is Kurios in Greek; the

holy name ADONAI is DOMINUS in Latin; and the holy name ADONAI is LORD in English

(A Remarkable Biblical Discovery, William P. Hall, p34). Now if Jesus spoke Aramaic did he

say MORYO when he meant ADONAI or LORD? If he spoke Greek did he say KURIOS to

mean LORD? Or did he say ADONAI in the original Hebrew when he meant LORD?

He who was ELOHIM (GOD), ADONAI (LORD), ELSHADAI (GOD ALMIGHTY), MORYO,

DOMINUS, KURIOS, was "EHYEH" (I-JEH). EHYEH is no other than God and adding "thearticulation "IAH" or "iah" anciently known to be pronounced as "I-JEH" and incorporated

into personal names, can NEVER be perverted into YAH, YAHWEH, JEHOVAH, or

YAHSHUA without absolute fraud upon the Word of God. All these so-called "sacred name

bibles" are pure fraud, junk, and incorporating pagan god names into the true Sacred Text!

Here is a historical fact that is undeniable: of the thirty-seven (37) quotations made by Jesus of

the Old Testament text, thirty (30) are almost verbatim from the Greek Septuagint (LXX) and

they do not agree with many, many words from the Masoretic text of the eighth century! This

forces us to examine if Jesus spoke Greek as well as Aramaic as well as ancient Hebrew. And if

the Apostles can be counted to have transferred to us the actual words of Jesus would they have

used different words and names than he used? If Jesus used ADONAI or KURIOS, or THEOS,

or MORYO, for the English LORD, would we not expect the Apostles to place this as well intheir written text? It is only in later post-apostolic translations that there is an attempt to

interoplate the tetragrammation and other substitutes into these texts. Many point the finger at

Origen and his Hexpla as the place where this perversion took place!


16/39

We do not know accurately where all the places might have been where EHYEH once existed in

the original Hebrew Scriptures. The sacred name of "HYH" was taken out of the text and

Adown and LORD inserted in its place to keep from pronouncing it. It was the sacred name

EHYEH that was the target of Leviticus 24:11,16---"An Israelitish woman's son blasphemed the

name of the LORD, and cursed;" ..."And he that blasphemeth the name of the LORD, he shall

surely be put to death." It is apparent that the name of God here was one other than LORD,

and LORD was used as a substitute for that name. It is also apparent that since Moses was

commanded to deliver the Israelites using the name EHYEH, that this was the salvation namecursed. If the name ADONAI or LORD in English was the name to not be uttered, then they

violated that rule over 5,000 times when it was placed in the Septuagint as Kurios. We know

then that the name the son cursed was the name Moses used to deliver the children of Israel.

And that name was EHYEH, not Yah, not Yahweh, and not Jehovah! All we have are

traditions why the Jews removed a particular sacred name and no actual recorded facts to back

these up. But what does this matter if we have a GREATER name for salvation in the name of

JESUS? A name that would be GREATER than any Old Testament name or title of God! We

would NEVER need to know or try to figure out any lost or secret name and the

tetragrammaton would become obsolete and worthless for salvation!

To then say the word LORD in English when worshiping or in Preaching, and mean by thisKurios, Adown, or ADONAI in Hebrew, is to honor God as Sovereign KING, the supreme ruler

of the universe! The word "LORD or Kurios" here is as much a name as any other title of God.

In Genesis 4:26 when Enos began to call upon the name of the "LORD" this is in reference to

God as supreme sovereign ruler of the earth. This word LORD here must be from ADOWN or

ADONAI. Anytime anyone calls Jesus "Lord" they are saying he is the one sovereign ruler

over them and all the earth. They are acknowledging his reign OVER THEM as the "last" heir

upon the throne of David in the Kingdom of God. To backward interpolate into this text of Enos

the sacred name EHYEH first given to mankind at the burning bush is false. To backward

interpolate into this text the tetragrammaton is false. Jews and Gentiles have incorrectly

substituted the name "LORD" when applied to EHYEH, the name of I AM is placed in these

prior text in many instances. Jews and Gentiles have attempted to give the title "LORD" the

same identity as the sacred name EHYEH. This is wrong! Thus, when they see LORD in the

text they suppose it automatically means they can insert their guess names and the

tetragrammaton where ever the word LORD is found. Correctly, the sacred name should be in

the text only "after" it was revealed to Moses. Before and after the revelation at the burning

bush, the text of the Scriptures could have God and LORD (as meaning ELOHIM and

ADONAI) with no intent of the sacred name being intended or to be spoken. In the text that

says LORD GOD all that is meant is ADONAI ELOHIM meaning the one Sovereign God above

all other gods of men. In some cases the word LORD or (ADOWN) was in the text originally

and the scribes inserted into the scrolls EHYEH, the sacred name, later this was substituted

with LORD and finally this was further substituted with the interpolation of thetetragrammaton and its many variant spellings.

The sacred name "Ehyeh" can also be spelled "Ehieh" or Ehjeh" since in the ancient Hebrew

there is no "y" in the alphabet and the letter "i" can be a "y" or even a "j" sound. How come

we hear nothing of the Yahwist that there is no "Y" in Palo Hebrew? How come we hear

nothing from the Yahwist about the sound of the letter "Y" that is supposed to be associated

with the letter "I" although the letter "I" itself is NOT the sound of the "Y?" How come they

do not tell those they deceive when the "Y" letter was invented and claim its sound was also

invented at that time like they cry about the letter "J?"

However, we are not dealing so much in how the letters are stacked on a line but thepronunciation of the letters that in modern languages a particular sounding letter satisfies the

same sound in trying to speak the ancient word forms and subsequently the name.


17/39

Tetragrammaton Fraud:

Below is an actual copy of a portion of the Dead Sea Scroll of Psalms 119:59-64, written in

ancient Aramaic (Babylonian) alphabet. The text is Talmudic-Babylonian (Aramaic) and is no

older than perhaps around 30BC-50AD. While scholars will wail and scream, these scrolls may

come from the era from 100-700AD. Some want these texts to be very old so they can

authenticate the tetragrammaton and or other teachings they want to claim the Christians stole

or borrowed from the Essenes. There existed in Israel up to the eighth century several religiousgroups who could have and did use these caves. The artifacts found in them demonstrate a

continious use for several centuries. The scroll is said to be from the library of the Essenes but

this cannot be proven. We are told without proof that the Essenes devoted their lives to

expunge from the manuscripts corruptions placed in them by Babylonian tainted scribes. We

do not know if this Psalm scroll was considered by them to be authentic or among those that

were corrupted. Scholars themselves are at disagreement with them when compared to the

Septuagint and other versions. There are thousands of differences. The text below contains two

different types of alphabet letter characters. Yet many hail this forgery as authentic.

Notice the four letters atthe bottom and the blue arrow

showing the location. These four

letters are foreign to the rest of the

script both as to style and also the

slant of the letters. These are in

paleo Hebrew an ancient alphabet

prior to the Babylonian captivity.

They are not in conformity with the

previous written script. They are

not even inserted in the manuscript

level with the surrounding text. Thisshows that this is a forgery and an interpolation.

Thus, the four letters are a careful fraud. The scripting is Aramaic Babylonian

rabbinical writing and did not come into practice until after the Babylonian captivity. The

interpolation is four letters written in the ancient Paleo Semitic alphabet(sometimes called

ancient Hebrew). But what are these four letters? Are they the tetragrammaton YHWH or

YHVH? No! The third letter is not a "waw or a vav". This letter is not the Paleo-Hebrew letter

for the W or the V.

Another point of fact is that there is no "W" letter in the Hebrew

alphabet. Here again, the Yahwist cannot have the name Yahweh with

out the "W" sound with the "W" alphabet character which also, like the

letter "J" was invented to symbolize the sound. We admit that the "W"

sound was also included in the use of the "V" but what are the rules of

grammer to know when the "V" had the "V" sound and the "W"

sound?The Concision Yahwist never seem to want to discuss this. They

want to focus in on the letter "J" and its sound so they can attack at the

name of Jesus to blot it out of the earth. Should they use the same

argument against the "Y" and the "W" they use against the "J" they

could not even pronouce Yahweh and the letters would not be YHWH

but IHVH!The Paleo-Hebrew letter that is translated by some as W or V

looks like the red letter below on the right in the graphic:


18/39

What then is the third letter? Look at the red letter to the right and compare it to the third

letter to the left. They are NOT the same.

What is the solution? What is the letter to the left that is being passed off as a W or a V among

scholars and sacred name blasphemers?

The next chart to the right will show you what this letter is and how it was perverted.

Now what is that letter before it was edited to make it appear like it was a W or a V?

The construction before it was edited looks like it was a shamek or

letter "S". What would the alleged tetragrammaton then be? It

would be IHSH. This would be "IEHSHU." When we add the final

"s" to add masculinity the name would be "IEHSHUS." Since the rule

of grammer is that an "I" followed by a vowel has the "J" sound we

arrive correctly at "JEHSHUS." which any person with intelligence

can see is pronounced as "JESUS." The throat and the bird's eye

indicates the third letter is an "S" and this is a crushing blow to the

letters YHWH. Who ever did surgery on this letter to make it appearas a W or a V did not suppose his/her fraud would be discovered.

Indeed, it was the careful investagative work done by myself who first discovered this fraud. It

was with great surprise that we learned the same had been discovered in South America by

another investigator. These charts are his work and we are indebted to him. Acts of fraud to

place the tetragrammaton on ancient artifacts and even manufacture ancient artifacts is now

out of control. Below I am going to post the ancient paleo Hebrew semitic artifact and show

you how someone wanted to prostitute even another ancient artifact.

Please notice that there is no such letters as "y",

"w', or "u" in ancient Paleo-Hebrew. Thus, any

guess name that so many now claim is the true

sacred name that uses the letters or English

sounds of "y" or "w" is false. The fact is we can

only guess at what the alphabet letters sounded

in ancient times. All we have are translations

into other languages that may not be

translations at all but rather new word forms

using the same phonetics of the more ancient

pronounciation. These new word forms would

retain both the ancient articulation and also the

same meaning.

The Yahweh cult parade

pictures of this artifact

around claiming that it

has engraved upon it the

tetragrammaton. This is false. The tetragrammaton is not found on it at

all.

Around the shoulder of the pomegranate is a carefully incised inscription in

early Paleo-Hebrew characters, which reads: "qodes kohanim I-beyt H".

"Holy or Sacred priests house of H." Some believe this object may be aphalic toy used in the rituals and ceremonies of the Baal cults.


19/39

The tetragrammaton is not on this artifact at all. The three letters IHV are fradulently added

to the letter "H" to form an imaginary IHVH. We know what happens when men resort to the

chambers of the imagry (Ezk 8:9-13). With Israel having worshiped so many different gods and

idols it is important that we do not allow the Jews or any Gentile to shove this tetragrammaton

falsehood down our throats. We are convinced that the tetragrammaton is a false name now

applied to God and it is a name of a false god.

What ancient deity would "H" represent if this letter represented the name of a (G) god? Thepomegranate is inscribed to be a gift from someone to the priest of the house of "H." This "H"

could represent the name of a priestly family. It could represent Judges 4:17 (House of Heber);

Amos 1:4 (House of Hazael); and 1Kings 12:31 (House of High Places). The "H" does not have

to be the name of God or a god. It could also represent the name of a pagan god or a pagan

temple whose name began with an "H," Pagans also called their priest holy ones. There were

Egyptian shrines found in Israel and the "H" could stand for "Horus" the Egyptian god. For

certain, if this was presented to the priest of God's house and "if" God's name was IHVH then

the letter to represent the name of God would be "I" and not the last letter "H." For anyone to

supply the missing letters IHV to this "H" and pass this relic off as proof that the sacred name

of God was Yahweh is FRAUD!

Fabricating guess names from the tetragrammaton

The following "guess" names by scholars and other name pundits are all false:

Iahshu, Iahwah, Yahushawah; Yahueh, Yahve, Jehowah, Eave, Yahhewahe, Yahweh, Yehwah,

Yahwah, Yahuah, and Yohewah (to list only a sample of the false names being claimed to be the

sacred name).

Many pundits and alleged scholars claim that the sounding of the "J" as Jeh is false. They claim

the letter "J" had no ancient equivilent sound but came from "I" and before this there was no

"J" sound with which the letter "I" could also represent. This is not only false, it shows how

ignorant these are who make this argument. The pronouncing of the letter "I" most certainly

had the "J" or "jo" or "jod" sound as this is preserved in the Greek translations of the LXX as

well as was preserved in the Greek pronunciation of "iah" for the Hebrew most sacred name

EHYEH or EHJEH. When the name could not be translated the phonetics were created in new

word forms. Thus, EHYEH became "Ieh, Yeh, Jeh, and ieh." Sometime later the "ieh" was

corrupted by vowel points into "iah." Finally, "iah" was erroneously made into "Jah" and

then pronounced "Yah."

In this corruption, not only is the original name EHYEH ignored and given no notice, the very

fact of the transfer of the correct pronounciation into a new word form as "Ieh, Yeh, and Jeh"becomes obscured and ignored. Another mystery name occurs fashioned out of the name of the

Egyptian moon and sky gods, that of Yahweh, which name means PERVERSE or

PERVERSITY! These gods and their names were also transferred over to volcanos whose

smoke and fire plumes reached up toward the moon and sky. Pagan altars where animal and

human sacrifices were offered emitted both fire and smoke, the similar effects of these large and

evil looking volcanos. At pagan shrines the fire and smoke ascended up to heaven to the

worship and praise of these gods of the sun, moon, sky, stars, planets, and constellations.

The Egyptian moon god "Iah" is called "lord" which in the glyphs is

"Neb" from which we get Nebu "the lords" and such names a "Neb-o,

Neb-ai, Neb-aioth, Neb-ajoth, Neb-ballat, Neb-at, Neb-u-chadnezzar, Neb-u-shasban, and Neb-u-zar. Nebu or Neb-o in Egyptian means "lord" and

in the Paleo-Hebrew language 'Neb" is translated "baal." Because this

Egyptian name or title did not represent the true God, it is not used by the Godly Israelites in


20/39

their personal names or the names of places. That Mount Nebo was named such had to be

before Moses ascended this mount. This mount was obviously dedicated to some "lord" or god

which in later years under the reign of Mesha, king of Moab, was found an altar allegedly to a

god named YHWH! Since this altar was found in Nebo during the reign of Ahab, and Mesha

considered this altar to be the altar of the god of Ahab, it is not hard to see right away that

Ahab's god was baal and not the true God (1Kings 16:30-32). Therefore, the altar identified on

the Moabite Stone along with the god YHWH was the god Baal. Keep in mind that in the days

of Mesha that the name "Israel" was the identity of the northen ten tribes under Ahab. So, forMesha to say he took the altar of YHWH, presumed to be the god of the northern ten tribes

under Ahab called Israel, he only dragged back before Kemosh his god an altar of baal. The

name Israel DID NOT identify the tribe of Judah at this time not did the name of the god

YHWH identify the name of the True God of Judah! YHWH has absolutely no connection to

the true God. This is another case where the Tetragrammaton is associated with paganism,

witchcraft, sorcery, and idolatry.

Moses and others transferred to the Paleo-Hebrew many Egyptian word phonetics and new

word forms were created. Scholars are at debate if Paleo-Hebrew word forms are derived from

Egyptian or Phonicean. The modern "J" sounding is nearly the same as the Egyptian soft "G"

and the cobra stood for both articulations. It is only reasonable then to see that the Paleo-Hebrew "G" and the "I" also carried the same characteristics. Moses used the Egyptian "Je"

as in "Jelly" giving the letter "I" the "Jod" or "G - J" when he renamed Oshea to Jehoshua. In

the ancient Egyptian script the cobra stood for both the letters of "G" and "J" and since Moses

transferred to the Paleo-Hebrew new word forms using the Egyptian language we expect these

sounds to follow. And they did follow up to at least the Babylonian adoption of Aramaic. Then

it appears the "J" sounding became "EE." Even later transfer of these word forms into old

German which is called

Yiddish there was another

change. The Massoretics

dropped the "J" sounding

and adopted the "Y" sound

used today. Some believe

this was because the

Pharisees had pledged to

blot out the name of Jesus

from the earth and by

removing the

pronouncuiation of the

ancient "J" from the letter

"I" this was accomplished.

If this is correct, then wesee the majestic hand of

God when this was restored

via a new and different

method and the name of Jesus restored correctly in the English version.

Make a careful note of an important hermaneutic cornerstone: the prefix to the name of Oshea

is not "Yah" it is "YEH" or "JEH." A fact so many either overlook on purpose or their error

causes them to give it little recognition or weight. The problem is inserting the vowel between I

and H. Is the correct vowel "a" or is it "e"? The "a" was selected no doubt because the name of

the Egyptian moon god had the "a" between the "I" and the "H" forming "IAH" or "YAH."

The Massoretes inserted the vowel point for "a" into "IH" and this corruption has been thesource of that error ever since.


21/39

We also want to keep in mind that alphabet sounds were also altered when the Jews adopted

Aramaic Babylonian articulations for letters and also pronounciation of word forms. The letter

"I" in some cases was given the "E-e" sound As in Yehshu(s) where the "Y" or "J" sound is

changed into an "e" so that Jehshu(s) is rendered "eesho" with no masculine (s)ending the

name. These were further altered by the Massoretes who used forms of Yiddish (ancient

German), and from this we have the "yah, yud, and yod" sounds of "I and Y." From this also

comes the hybrid spelling Yeshua. There still seems to be a remnant of the "J" sound in

German "Jah" as when saying the word "yes." Among the Sephardic Jews of Spain and intheir ancient Ladino the "I" or "J" took on the Spanish "H" sound which is a perversion when

applied to the sacred name. But anciently the "I" was "jod" with a soft "g" sound as was

transferred from ancient Egyptian into the Paleo-Hebrew word forms. The Spanish Sephardic

retains the "J" sound with the letter "I" and Sephardic is more akin to ancient Hebrew then

Yiddish will ever be. When you make an academic choice take the Sephardic prounciation of

alphabet letters to be more Hebrew sounding BEFORE you adopt the Germanic Yiddish ones.

Research Beyond The Books:

Do not always rely on some modern books (Jewish or Gentile 1500-present) to give you the

correct information about the sacred name. Many of these books are full of error, lies,misinformation, and apostasy.

One such case is the corrupted opinion of Henry George Liddell, author of the English-Greek

Lexicon now known as Liddell-Scott-Jones Greek English Lexicon. Liddell is one of those

"higher critics" that so many wail about among the Yahwist, yet they turn to his lexicon for

support that the name of Jesus came from the name of the Greek goddess of healing, Iasa. Here

is Liddell's rendering:

Under Iaso: The Greek goddess of healing reveals that the name Iaso is Ieso in the Ionic dialect

of the Greeks, Iesous being the contracted genitive form!

Iesous being the "contracted genitive form" is Liddell's invention. Neither Liddell nor any idiot

who quotes him have ever produced any artifact or document where "Iesous" was ever used

among the Greek Ionics for the name of a Greek god or goddess.

Liddell was a Yahwist and himself looked for ways to denigrate the name of Jesus. A Yahwist is

a person who believes the tetragrammaton is the name of God and that "Yahweh" is the correct

pronuciation. If Liddell was half the scholar he is made out to be (he plagerized Francis

Passow's German-Greek Lexicon), he would have instead looked and explained the name of

Jesus from the Aramaic language and its equivilent written in Greek phonetics. That he would

deny the deity of God in the name of Jesus by even associating his name with that of a pagangoddess, shows his willing purpose to avoid any connection to the Aramaic. To say the name of

Jesus (Iesous) was dervied from a female name is a real joke. This is an example of an educated

liar.

Do all agree with Liddell? No:

ME. [a. L. Iesus, a. Gr. 'IhsouV, ad. late Heb. or Aramaic Jeshua, for earlier Jehoshua or

Joshua (explained as Jah (or Jahveh) is salvation), a frequent Jewish personal name (William

Little, et al., eds. , The Oxford Universal Dictionary on Historical Principals, London: Oxford

University Press, 1955).

Here, the English Jesus can be seen to have come down to us from the Latin, Iesus. Iesus then,

is from the Greek Iesous, which is in turn a phonetic pronunciation of the Aramaic for


22/39

Jehshoo(s). Jehshoo(s) was derived from the earlier Hebrew "Yeh" a contraction of EHYEH,

and "yesha" the Hebrew word for salvation.

(jezus) [...Lat. From Gr. Iesous, which is for Heb. Jeshua, a late form of Jehoshua or

Joshua...] ( John D. Davis, The Westminster Dictionary of the Bible, (Philadelphia, The

Westminster Press, 1944).

Here are two witnesses who do not agree with Liddell's perversion. However we may assessLiddell's junk, the Yawist have at their disposal a quote from one of their own. We shall simply

deny it! Liddell did not write the LXX and he was not an Apostle. We will place our trust on

they who had better brains and a much more impressive faith.

Several alleged artifacts are claimed to have the YHVH or YHWH inscribed in or upon them,

and we have discovered these to be frauds someone manipulated. If you want to accept what

some Bible translator or writer places into his "preface" or other introductory notes as proof of

some fact the sacred name is spelled a certain way, then you may be using error for your faith.

Below is a vase found in ancient city of Gat. The letters and the image on this ewer are copied

and translated for you. Here is one artifact the Yahwist will not promote because it links thename "Yah" with that of the goat god. It appears the god-name "Yah" was a favorite among

many pagan cultures. The Freemasons borrow this goat god for their own lodges and secret

devotions:

Goat god of Gat

Charging The Yahwist With Falsehood And Blasphemy:

The charge against the Yahwist is that in their extreme hate against the name of Jesus they

spread falsehood and blasphemy. Once their minds are seared with a hot iron, they do not take

the time to research the name of Jesus honestly and come to the truth about the "wonderful"

name (Isa 9:6). The concision law-keeping spirit will not allow them to be that humble. Below is

one of these hateful and blasphemous antichrist allegations:

Posted by Yahweh worshiper on a Yahweh forum:
http://jesus-messiah.com/studies/masonic-goat.htmlhttp://jesus-messiah.com/studies/masonic-goat.html


23/39

"What I have learned from friends on the name issue. Under swine in Noah Webster's 1828

dictionary that "SUS" is latin for swine. When I saw this I began to think that it might be

possible that I may be deceived about the name of the savior. His name means "pig god".

Another piece of research that came across my path was where the name of Jesus came from.

Here it is. In regard to the pagan character of the unbloody sacrifice of the mass, we have seen

not little already. But there is something yet to be considered, in which the working of the

mystery of iniquity will still further appear. There are letters on the wafer that are worth

reading. These letters are IHS. What mean these mystical letters? To a Christian these lettersare represented as signifying, " Iesus Hominum Salvator" " Jesus

the Savior of men." But let a Roman worshipper of Isis (for in the

age of the emperors there were innumerable worshippers of Isis in

Rome) cast his eyes upon them, and how will he read them? He

will read them of course, according to his own well-known system

of idolatry: "Isis, Horus, Seb," that is "The Mother, the Child, and

the Father of the gods," in other words, " The Egyptian Trinity."

The Two Babylons or The Papal Worship, Alexander Hislop. The

name of Jesus then equals Isis which is not the name of my

Elohim."

Is Hislop correct? Does not anyone know that the Egyptian trinity

is not Isis, Horus, and Seb: but it was Osiris, Isis, and Horus in

that order "OIH" and not that manufactured by Hislop? If you

want to be anticatholic because of the mass or some other

perversion of truth, that is fine, only tell the truth. Do not

succumb to lies to refute lies. Hislops twist of the facts are not

needed to prove the mass is a pagan ritual not practiced anywhere in the New Testament. For

Mrs. Yahweh worshiperabove to associate Jesus with Isis is a shame beyond comprehension.

But then, Yahwist are not known for trying to find the truth once their antiJesus hatred reaches

its virulent peak.

The name of Jesus means "pig god", come on Mrs. Yahweh worshiper, surely you have more

brains than that. But then, even Jerry Kirk in a debate in Atlanta, Georgia several years ago

claimed this same meaning about the name of Jesus. He said that to baptize in the name of

Jesus was to baptize in the name of a "pig god". So it appears this tale is circulating among the

Yahwist and they as in other cases of their ignorance, have taken it as fact and are spreading

the falsehood. They make the claim but they do not cite one source of reliability to back up

their anti-Christ claim. To take Latin "sus" and associate this with the name of Jesus because it

has "sus" within it, is ignorance. Could we say then that all words beginning with or ending in

"sus" likewise mean "pig or swine"? Let's look at some of this stupidity for a minute:

Sus-penders= "pig straps"

Sus-pension= "pig held high by both ends"

Sus-picious= "pig looking"

Sus-tain= "pig support"

Sus-teneance= "pig food"

Sus-pect= "pig criminal"

Sus-an= "pig woman"

Sus-annah= "pig money"

And some of these idiots claim that "sus" or "soos" in the name of Jesus means "horse god".

They take this from the word "horse" in Hebrew (Strongs 5483 cuwc (soos). Thus they say,"aha the name of Jesus in Hebrew means "horse god."


24/39

This is proof that ignorance is the birth of stupidity and false doctrine. Those who have the

same mentality of the person spreading stupidity are the converts to such false doctrines the

Yahwist are spreading. It has been my experience that they are all rebels and cannot be

Pastored and do not fit within the Church family of those holding to sound doctrine so they

depart out from among us to declare themselves as the prophets of God and end up in every

wind of doctrine and heresy that comes to their ears. My 93 year old daddy once told me: "Son,

figures never lie but liars always figure". My point here is that if you try to find out the

meaning and interpretation of the name of Jesus from those who already have virulent hatredagainst his name, or from Jewish or Gentile books continuing a tradition of man, you will likely

NEVER find it. All you will find is what they want you to know to group you into their theology

and traditions of interpretation, with such like that the name of Jesus derives or comes from

"sus" and means "pig god."

Others who follow this mentality will also rush to the names Joshua or Yoshua, or Ya- Shua,

and then interpret them as meaning "Jehovah is salvation" (Jehovah is the Saviour of Jesus,

one God saving another God). If and when you ever get deeply into the study of the guess-names

Jehovah and Yahweh, you will enter into the murky and dark world of the occults where their

conjecture and supposition are brought together in mysticism to claim they have discovered the

lost sacred name based upon either an interpretation of YHVH or YHWH. Out of the practiceof these cult groups comes the methodology of special tricks used in Jewish gematria and

numerology to try and prove these guess names are accurate. Here is the bottom line on this.

We are to base our faith on the MORE SURE WORD OF PROPHECY, what saith and

teacheth the Word of God. If someone wants to prove the name of Jesus means "pig god" or

some other of their claimed falsehoods, let them produce the evidence. This far all they have

done is made claims and assertions and produced nothing.

NO OTHER NAME

In Acts 4:12 the Scripture is plain and clear: *There is NONE OTHER NAME under heaven

given among men whereby we MUST be saved.* The Yahwist claim this name is that of God

the Father (Yahweh), and not the name of their second God the Son (Yahshua) has no salvation

in it. So in their interpretation of Acts 4:12 the reference is not Yahshua or Jesus but it is the

Father's name Yahweh that is the saving name. Thus, they teach there is absolutely no

salvation in the name of the second God at all, salvation is only in the name of Yahweh. The

Oneness Yahwehs simply claim that the name of God the Son is Yahweh and that he came in his

Father's name and so say the salvation name is still Yahweh. Actually I have found the alleged

Oneness Yahwist to actually be two-God, in that they continue to separate the Father and hisname separate from the Son and his name.

Now the word *name* in Acts 4:12 points back to its antecedent, the *name* of Jesus Christ in

verse 10. It does not point back to the name Yahweh or any word to prove Yahweh is the only

saving name. So, let's get this straight: No other name of God, no other name of man, no titles,

no appellations, no tetragrammaton, is or can be a salvation name except that of JESUS

Messiah. This fully proves that whatever the Old Testament names of God were, they have been

replaced with the much greater NAME than they all. The Jews who reject Jesus and his name

as Jesus Messiah (Christ) or LORD JESUS CHRIST (KING JESUS MESSIAH), have no choice

but to still think they can obtain salvation in an Old Testament name or title of God or some

name they invent like the tetragrammaton. Leaning upon these errors, Gentiles will attempt todeny that the name JESUS is a valid name, and try to substitute for it Yahweh and even

Yahshua. Some want to hang their whole case upon the use of *J* as a substitute for *I* or

*Y*. Are these claims valid? Read the rest of this article and you will find that they are not.
http://goon.stg.brown.edu/cgi-bin/pbcgi?sourceform=pbeasy.shtml&maxhits=50&searchtype=fetch&version=kjv-g&searchstring=Acts+4%3A12http://goon.stg.brown.edu/cgi-bin/pbcgi?sourceform=pbeasy.shtml&maxhits=50&searchtype=fetch&version=kjv-g&searchstring=Acts+4%3A12http://goon.stg.brown.edu/cgi-bin/pbcgi?sourceform=pbeasy.shtml&maxhits=50&searchtype=fetch&version=kjv-g&searchstring=Acts+4%3A12http://goon.stg.brown.edu/cgi-bin/pbcgi?sourceform=pbeasy.shtml&maxhits=50&searchtype=fetch&version=kjv-g&searchstring=Acts+4%3A12


25/39

Those who come to deny the name of JESUS want everyone to think of the ancient names of

God as higher and more holier than that name and spelling. Some even want the Greek

substitute LORD which was interpolated in Greek Septuagint version at Exodus 3:14-15 in the

place of the *removed* sacred name, and want this *LORD* to be a name and substitute it in

Mathew 28:19 for the word Father in Baptism? This also is false!

Errors about the name of Jesus end up certifying the practices of Pharisee Judaism as being the

correct way to God and Heaven without the name of Jesus, by going back under the Law and byusing some claimed old Testament name of God that saves better than the name of Jesus? Well,

as an Apostolic Messianic Christian Jew (Rom 2:29), I reject that. Our faith is not in the guess

names and methods of Jewish, Catholic, or Protestant mysticism that tries to discover the lost

name so they need not to confess faith in the revealed salvation NAME of Jesus. Remember, we

have a MORE SURE WORD OF PROPHECY on the sacred and most holy name of God. The

name of JESUS was prophesied by an angel to be the name all Gentiles and Jews would put

their TRUST in for salvation AND IN THAT DAY THERE WOULD BE ONE NAME OF

GOD (Isa 11:10, 12:4; Zech 14:9; Luke 1:31. That NAME was prophesied to Mary before Jesus

was born (the more sure word of Prophecy); Mat 12:21; Rom 15:12).

Isaiah 52 & 53 And The Suffering Servant:

Below is Isaiah 52:13-53:2 in the Babylonian Aramaic alphabet. Who is the suffering servant of

Isaiah 52 and 53. Will we find his name as Yahweh or Yahshua? Beginning at Isaiah 52:13

after the word hineh and taking the first letter of every seventh letter what do we have? We

have "Yeshua simon lemo". Interpreted as "YESHUA IS APPOINTED TO BE HIM."

Yeshua is certainly not Yahweh, Yahshua, or Yahwehshua. The name Yeshua correctly

Yehshua (since the h was dropped here in the Aramaic and is silent), is transliterated as Jehsus

and with the "h" silent as in Yeshua, we have Jesus! This is remarkable. This name was

written into Greek by the Apostles as "IS" in the Nomina Sacra and latter incorrectly expanded

to IEHSOUS" and dropping the "H" becasue it is silent most often in Hebrew, we have

"IESOUS." The sacred name without the masculine "s" would be "IESOU". And from this we

get some who pronounce the sacred name a

ehjeh asher ehjeh

Documents