electronic eau claire conversation e2c2. who is listening? 358 people have read electronic eau...
TRANSCRIPT
Electronic
Eau Claire
Conversation E2C2
Who is
list
enin
g? 358 people have read
Electronic
Eau Claire Conversation.
Who is
giv
ing
feedback
? 68 people wrote or supported priorities.
That's 3.4 hours of
public comment @
three minutes per priorities.
Age
Dem
ogra
phic
s
Economic Development
Building Inspection
Planning and Zoning
Other Community Organizations
Recreation
Snow and Ice Control
Parks and Trails
Street maintenance
Library
Health
Transit
General Government
Fire and Rescue
Police
Capital Projects
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Budgeting By Priorities Results
CitizensResponseCurrentSpending
Dollars allocated of $500
Pri
ori
ties
Map
District 1 = 10 responses
District 2 = 9, District 3 =10
District 5 = 9, District 5 = 20Outside of City = 9
Fire andRescue
Police
CapitalProjects
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Budgeting by Priorities Results
CurrentSpendingDistrict 1District 2District 3District 4District 5Outside EC
Dollars allocated of $500
EconomicDevelopment
Recreation
Snow andIce Control
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Budgeting by Priorities Results
CurrentSpendingDistrict 1District 2District 3District 4District 5Outside EC
Dollars allocated of $500
BuildingInspection
Planningand Zoning
OtherCommunity
Organizations
0 5 10 15 20 25
Budgeting by Priorities Results
CurrentSpendingDistrict 1District 2District 3District 4District 5Outside EC
Dollars allocated of $500
Parks andTrails
Streetmaintenance
Library
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Budgeting by Priorities Results
CurrentSpendingDistrict 1District 2District 3District 4District 5Outside EC
Dollars allocated of $500
Health
Transit
GeneralGovernment
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Budgeting by Priorities Results
CurrentSpendingDistrict 1District 2District 3District 4District 5Outside EC
Dollars allocated of $500
Vis
itors
to E
2C
2
67 participants (18.7%)358 visitorsPeak Democracy normal 10 – 15%
Sati
sfact
ion
Surv
ey
Yes = 56 (88%)No = 6 (12%)
Sati
sfact
ion S
urv
ey
All
“no”
com
ments
error in using 50 cents.
Site was difficult to navigate
with iPad and iPhone; ended
up having to enter information
on desktop. It was largely inaccessible to
me as a blind computer user
who reads with a screen
reader. It will get boring fast. I don't
feel compelled to come back
and use it again. It doesn't break thins (sic)
down into projects I may or
may not agree with.
Sati
sfact
ion S
urv
ey
Sele
cted “
yes”
co
mm
ents
(17)
Very easy to navigate,
allowed me to see percentage and make
changes if I wanted. It's nice to feel like you
have a say. Hopefully
it will matter. It was user friendly and I felt like I had a
say.