environmental management plan - world...

' X, 0 #' EVO8L91,5r.~*1. ~ 4d E895

VOL. 10

1 Environmental Management Plan

EAST - WEST CORRIDORCansultancy Services for Independent Review and

sgb4b =;*i .w ̂ \ Consolidation of Environmental and< < , - %Social Assessment

4 1 Sp--'' '4

,,,'t''34' -, -- ~~~A ~

~~~~41 t~~~~~2

July 2004

, , At, f 0 / Submitted by

Operations Research Groupin association with

Spatial Decisions

. t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~4.Submitted to

National Highway Authority of IndiaT'

.4 I,. -_

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Ii

i

iIi

iIiI

i

i

i

I

I

i

i

INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL & SOCIAL ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND CONSOLIDATION OFEIA, EMP AND RAP REPORTS FOR AYODHYA TO MUZAFFARPUR SECTION OF EAST WEST CORRIDOR FINAL SPECIFIC EMP

Specific Environmental Management PlanPackage II (Section C-l1l/2)

Table of Contents

1. Introduction1.1 Project Background ................................................. 1-1

1.2 Project Description ................................................. 1-2

1.3 Statutory Clearances Required ................................................. 1-4

2. Environmental setting2.1 Meteorology ................................................. 2-1

2.2 Physical Environment ................................................. 2-1

2.3 Biological Environment .................................................. 2-3

2.4 Social Environment ................................................. 2-3

3. Environmental Management Action Plan

4. Environmental Monitoring Plan

5. Environmental Management Budget

Annexures

Annexure I: Proposed Alignment of Four Lane Carriageway

Annexure Il: Proposed Service RoadAnnexure III: Proposed Highway Junction ImprovementsAnnexure IV: Details of Proposed UnderpassesAnnexure V: Existing Major and Minor Bridges

Annexure VI: Proposed Improvement / Construction of Bridges and Culverts

Annexure VII: Proposed Borrow AreasAnnexure VIII: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Results

Annexure IX: Details of Ponds within the Direct Impact Zone

Annexure X: Surface Water Quality Monitoring ResultsAnnexure Xl: Ground Water Quality Monitoring ResultsAnnexure XII: Ambient Noise Level Monitoring Results

Annexure XIII: Number of Trees to be Cut and Saved due to Proposed Alignment

Annexure XIV: Sensitive Receptors within the Direct Impact Zone

Annexure XV: Proposed Parking AreasAnnexure XVI: Noise BarriersAnnexure XVII: Proposed Environmental Monitoring Locations

Operations Research Group in association with Spatial Decisions


Schematics

Schematic 1: Location and Lead of Borrow Areas - Package IISchematic 2: Suggested Specific Noise Barriers - Package IISchematic 3: Median Plantation - Package II

Drawings

DRG NO. 1: STRIP DETAILS OF C-111/2 PACKAGE IIDRG NO. 2(a): ENHANCEMENT OF POND AT Km 3.410 (Basti Bypass)

Operations Research Group in association with Spatial Decisions 2


1.INTRODUCTION

1.1 Project Background

The Lucknow Muzaffarpur National Highway Project (LMNHP) is along NH-28 on the East-Westcorridor of the National Highways Development Project (NHDP). It is a part of phase-lIl programme ofthe East-West Corridor development that is about strengthening and widening of the existing two-laneNational Highway 28 to four-lane dual carriageway configuration.

LMNHP consists of five consultancy packages- C 111/1, C 111/2, CI1/3, CIII/5, Gorakhpur Bypass. Eachconsultancy package is further divided into multiple contract packages for the purpose of roadconstruction and implementation of environmental management action plan.

Consultancy Package C 111/2 runs from Ayodhya (Km 142.500) to Gorakhpur (Km 251.700). Besides, itincludes Ayodhya Bypass, a complete new road section to be built for a length of 6 Km. This covers atotal length of 115.200 Km for package C 111/2 covering districts- Faizabad, Gonda, Basti, SantkabirNagar and Gorakhpur. The package carries on an average 21,000 to 24,000-passenger car units (PCU)daily, based on the traffic survey conducted in the year 2002, with goods traffic amounting to about 52 -55% of the total traffic. The traffic volume on most part of the section is expected to grow up to 150,000to 159,000 PCUs at the end of design period of 30 years. The purpose of the proposed project is tocater to the increasing traffic volume, reduce travel time and transport costs besides improving socio-economic condition of the local population.

Consultancy package C-l1l/2 has been divided into three full contract packages (Contract Package 1, 11and Ill). The project under consideration in this report is contract package II of C-l1l/2. Chainage-wisedescription of the contract packages for the project road is provided in Table 1.1.

TABLE-1.1: CONTRACT PACKAGES IN AYODHYA.GORAKHPUR SECTION (SECTION C-11112) OF LMNHP UNDER NHAI PHASE-IllPROGRAM OF EAST - WEST CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT

Packages Contract Packages Chainage. Total Remarksunder LMNHP Length

(Consultancy) (in Km)

C-111/2 I Ayodhya Bypass 27.500 Ayodhya Bypass of 6 Km(Ayodhya- and Km 142.500 to lengthGorakhpur Km 164.000Section)

AyodhyaBypass and il Km. 164.000 to Km 44.000Km. 142.500 to 208.000Km 251.700 of

Operations Research Group in association with Spatial Decisions 1-i


pNH.28. l lII Km 208.000 to Km 43.700251.700 (Designchainage 253.363)

1.2 Project Description

Contract Package II of Consultancy Package C-1ll/2 of the LMNHP covers a total length of 44.000 Km.The road stretch in this package starts at Km 164.000 and terminates at Km 208.000 passing throughdistrict Basti. Rivers Mayderma and Kwano intercept the project road at Km 168.200 and 194.400respectively.

TABLE- 1.2: SALIENT FEATURES OF THE PROJECT STRETCH

Road stretch Package II of Ayodhya-Gorakhpur stretch on NH-28

Road length 44.000 km

Starting Point Km 164.000

End Point Km 208.000

Existing 2-lane facility with avg. carriageway of 6.50m-7.0m.Carriageway

Available RoW 30-40 m for road length of 23 Km, 40-50 m for road length of 20.6 Km, 60 m ormore for road length of 1.4 Km (chainage wise RoW information is provided inEIA document)

Districts en-route Basti

Major towns Basti (out skirts), Maharajganj

No. of villages Total 40 villages

Major Junctions At Ch. 169.680 (Babhram jn.), 196.629 (Barevan jn.), 201.067 (Chanpuras jn.),and Crossings 203.765 (Harriya jn.)

Major nver Mayderma river at Ch. 168.200, Kwano river at Ch. 194.400. 1 pond within thecrossing/ponds/str direct impact zone.eams/canals

Existing Cross 1 major (across Kwano river) and 5 minor bridges. 82 culverts (Slab, Pipe andDrainage Arch type)Structures

Drinking water Ground water sources: 408 hand pumps, 5 wellssources

Eco-Sensitive None on the alignment or in close vicinity of the roadAreas

1.2.1 Summary of Proposed Improvements inTechnical Design

Alignment arrangement: Alignment arrangement (Annexure I) is proposed to be largely eccentrictowards right with concentric arrangement predominantly in built up locations.

Operations Research Group in association with Spatial Decisions 1-2


Service roads: Service roads with 5.5 m wide carriageway except at Maharajganj and Kaptanganjwhere the width is proposed to be 5.0 m due to inadequate width of right of way. The service roadshave been proposed at major built up locations to separate highway traffic from local traffic and provideaccess to commercial and residential premises, bus stops etc. Annexure II provides chainage wisedescription of proposed service roads.

Underpasses: 1 vehicular and 8 pedestrian underpasses have been proposed for smooth crossing oflocal traffic as described in Annexure IV.

Cross Drainage Structure: There is 1 major and 5 minor bridges (Annexure V) and 82 culverts inexistence under the project stretch. The culverts are of Slab (21), H.P. (58) and Arch (3) type. Theexisting cross drainage structures are found to be inadequate. It is proposed to construct 1 new majorbridge and 4 minor bridges. It is further proposed to replace a few of the existing culverts, as they areinadequate to overcome the problem of inundation. (Annexure VI).

Construction of additional 2-lane ROB on Basti bypass: There is an existing two lane ROB onBasti bypass. Additional two lane ROB is being proposed.

Construction of four lane fly over near Basti town: At km 196.600, S.H. No. 5 intersects NH-28near Basti town. To ease the traffic situation in future at this point, it is being proposed to construct afour-lane flyover over the proposed four lane road of NH-28.

Toll Plaza: Toll plaza has been proposed at Basti bypass in Km 0.75 to km 1.40 (south end).



1.3 Statutory Clearances Required

The project would require various clearances to be obtained by the contractor prior to starting up theproject during mobilization period as well as during the course of construction. The various clearancesrequired by the contractor for the project stretch are described below:

TABLE- 1.3: STATUTORY CLEARANCES TO BE OBTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR THE PROJECT STRETCH

S. Clearance Required Statute under which Clearance Statutory AuthorityNo. for is required

1. Permission for EP Act, 1986 Central Ground Water BoardWithdrawal of GroundWater for construction

2. Hot mix plants, Air (Prevention and Control of Uttar Pradesh Pollution ControlCrushers and Batch Pollution) Act, 1981 and The Boardplants Noise Pollution (Regulation and

Control) Rules, 2000.

3. Storage, handling and Hazardous Wastes (Management Uttar Pradesh Pollution Controltransport of Hazardous and Handling) Rules, 1989 and Boardmaterials Manufacturing, Storage and

Import of Hazardous ChemicalsRules, 1989

4. Clearance for EP Act, 1986 Uttar Pradesh Pollution Controlengineering for location Boardand layout of workers Manufacturing, Storage andcamp, equipment and Import of Hazardous Chemicalsstorage yards Rules, 1989

5. Quarries (if new Environment (Protection) Act, Department of mining,quarres are opened) 1986 Government of Uttar Pradesh,

Uttar Pradesh Pollution ControlBoard

6. Discharges from labour Water (Prevention and Control of Uttar Pradesh Pollution Controlcamp Pollution) Act, 1974 Board

7. Disposal of Bituminous Hazardous Wastes (Management Intimate to local civic body to useWastes, if any and Handling) Rules, 1989 the local solid waste disposal site

The contractor will procure sand only from agencies licensed for collection of sand from river. Wherethe contractor directly engages in sand collection from river, (called as surface mining), he will berequired to obtain necessary permission from the State Irrigation Department.

In addition, any other clearance which supervision consultant or PIU, NHAI feels required for thisproject will be procured by the Contractor.

The contractor will submit an undertaking to NHAI agreeing to ensure that no child labour shall be usedfor any construction and to comply with the EMP provision to the PIU, NHAI.



2. ENVIRONMENTALSETTING

This chapter documents the major findings of the Environmental Impact Assessment process along withthe baseline conditions that have been used to formulate the Environmental Management Planincluding the mitigation and enhancement measures. The micro level data have been obtained fromwithin a width of 30 m either side of the existing centre line and the macro level data, as per the MOEFguidelines for conducting EIA have been collected from within 7 km radius of the project corridor.

2.1 Meteorology

The project stretch is located in humid sub-tropical region. The climate is distinguished by three distinctseasons- Hot summer (from April to June), Warm humid rainy season (from July to September) andCold winter (from November to February). The mean minimum and maximum temperature observedduring winter is 9 and 23 degree Celsius. Similarly, the mean minimum and maximum temperatureduring summer is 25 and 44 degree Celsius. Wind is predominantly easterly and westerly from Octoberto June and shifts easterly or south-easterly from July to September. Winds are in general very light butblow with force during late summer and monsoon seasons. The average wind velocity is 5 km/hr andranges between 2 to 7.1 km/hr. The average annual rainfall in the project area observed is 1166 mm.The relative humidity is above 70% during monsoon and post-monsoon season. During summerseason as the air is very dry the relative humidity decreases.

The project is expected to bring a slight change in micrometeorology by raising daytime temperature onthe road surface and soils with felling of trees. The impact is categorized as low adverse.

2.2 Physical Environment

2.2.1 Land Resources

The topography of the entire section of the project stretch is open, plain and rolling. Area is mainlyalluvial plain densely populated and in most parts highly cultivated though the level is only broken bythe shallow valleys of the rivers. The average slope of the terrain is around less than 5 cm per Km andthe fall of the slope is generally towards Southeast direction.

The project corridor falls within Type-IV seismic zone with moderate to high seismic coefficient but theproject is not expected to have any impact on the seismic stability of the area.



The soils in the region are mainly of the alluvial type and are very fertile lands. Land use is primarilyagriculture. Borrow areas have been identified at 6 locations in the project stretch, all on left side onprivately owned land (Annexure VII). No new stone and rock quarries are proposed to be opened forthe purpose of the project without prior clearances.

Environmental impacts on the soils include compaction of soils, contamination of soils and loss ofproductive soils because of borrowing of earth, setting up of construction camps and erosion atembankments and sides of borrow areas. Besides changes in land use pattern are also envisaged,particularly during operation phase.

2.2.2 Ambient Air Quality

Monitoring results of existing ambient air quality in the package stretch (Annexure VIII) indicate thatlevel of pollutants monitored is well below the prescribed National Ambient Air Quality Standards(NAAQS).

Assessed project impacts on ambient air quality along the project stretch include increase in suspendedparticulate matter due to dust generation and gaseous pollutants such as CO, NO2 etc due to exhaustemissions. While increase in suspended particulate matter shall be predominantly during constructionphase, exhaust gas emissions will result both during construction and operation phases.

2.2.3 Water Resources

The rivers intersecting the project road are Mayderma river at Km. 168.200 and Kwano river at Km.194.400.The project has direct impact on 1 pond (Annexure IX) in the Basti Bypass region. Monitoredwater quality of Kwano river (Annexure X) and at Maharajganj and Harriya for ground water quality(Annexure Xl) assessment reveals that the water quality is in general good. However, the same can notbe used for drinking purpose owing to presence of high coliform count and will be require treatmentprior to consumption.

The existing cross drainage structures are inadequate that will deteriorate drainage condition in thevicinity of the road. But design stage has taken care of the drainage across the project stretchproposing replacement / construction of new cross drainage structures (Annexure VI). The provision willimprove the drainage condition in the vicinity of the road.

Other impacts on water quality will largely be contamination of surface and ground water fromconstruction activities and from wastewater discharge of construction camps, siltation problems insurface water, and stress on available water resources, mainly ground water resources for consumptionin construction and domestic activities.

2.2.4 Noise Environment

Ambient noise level monitoring (Annexure XII) was done at commercial cum residential zones ofHarriya and Maharajganj (Basti). Only daytime noise levels were monitored and the results reveal thatdaytime sound pressure levels are within the permissible levels.



It is assessed that noise levels shall be increased both during construction and operation phases of theproject.

Noise modelling was conducted to assess impact of highway operation phase on sensitive receptorlocations using FHWA (Federal Highway Administration, US Department of Transportation) developednoise model. Conservative estimates have been computed through the model for three different yearsof operation- 2005, 2020, 2030 with adjusted operative speeds and increased traffic volume. Theresults (listed in EIA document-chapter on Assessment of Impacts) indicate that both daytime and nighttime noise levels shall exceed the permissible limits at all locations. In effect specific noise barriers shallbe required to be provided at the sensitive locations falling within the right of way to mitigate adverseimpacts of noise during highway operations. Specific locations and choice of barrier types need to bedecided based on degree of impact that will in turn depend on distance of the existing sensitivereceptor falling within the right of way from the proposed road.

2.3 Biological Environment

The project corridor does not pass through any reserved or protected forests and no endangered floraspecies have been reported along the highway. The impact of removal of trees however should be aconcern as a total of 22100 trees exist within the RoW, out of which 8812 trees are proposed to be cutfor highway widening (Annexure XIII). The trees consist of species such as Eucalyptus, Sheesham,Neem, Ashok, Peepal, Mango, Arjun, Cassia, Bargad, Gulmohar, Mahua. The assessed environmentalimpacts include upsetting of microclimate with increase in ambient temperature as well as soil erosionproblems and increase in suspended particulate matter in ambient air.

As regards the fauna of the region, the historical human influence and the continuous human habitationalong the NH-28 has meant that there is very little faunal presence except for domestic animals alongthe highway and there are no reports of any endangered species present or identified in the project-affected area. However, if any rare/endangered species is found during course of construction,construction may then cause impact on the same.

2.4 Social Environment

2.4.1 Human Use Value

The proposed project shall have an environmental and social impact on some sensitive receptors(Annexure XIV) falling within the direct impact zone. It is envisaged that the agricultural land along thehighway will get converted to industrial/commercial use to realise the value of the improved connectivityof the area. Such an induced development will require a check to ensure success of the proposed 4-lane road. Increased vehicular speed means that the fringe areas along the road are at increased riskfrom speeding vehicles.



2.4.2 Cultural properties

As per the United Nations definition, "cultural property" includes sites having archaeological(prehistoric), paleontological, historical, religious and unique natural values such as waterfalls, canyonsetc. Structures of cultural value have been identified within the direct impact zone (RAP Document).The proposed project implementation is likely to adversely impact some of these cultural propertieseither directly or indirectly. The impacts and treatment have widely been dealt with under SIAdocument. There is no identified structure in the project stretch falling under the purview of theArchaeological Survey of India or State Archaeological Department.

2.4.3 Quality Of Life Values

The project is expected to bring in substantial improvement in connectivity along the corridor. Presently,the traffic conditions are characterised by mixed traffic with bullock carts and high-speed truck jostlingfor space on the highway. These combinations create hazardous conditions for all the road users. Withsegregation of local and through traffic, by the provision of service lanes, underpasses, highwayjunction improvement etc. the project will have a beneficial effect on road safety. However, real safetyconcerns remain with reference to the children using the highway to get to the numerous schools andother educational institutions that have direct access opening on to the NH-28.


INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL & SOCIAL ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND CONSOLIDATION OFEIA, EMP AND RAP REPORTS FOR AYODHYA TO MUZAFFARPUR SECTION OF EAST WEST CORRIDOR

FINAL SPECIFIC EMP

I

3. ENVIRONMENTALMANAGEMENT ACTIONPLAN

This chapter documents the description of various environmental management measures for avoidanceand / or mitigation of the impacts assessed during baseline study. The proposed measures have beensuggested for three stages: pre-construction stage, construction stage and post-construction stage. Theresponsibilities for implementation of the EMP measures shall remain the same as described in generalEMP.

Many of the environmental measures remain the same as suggested in General EMP. Monitoringschedule as specified in Monitoring Plan at the locations specified shall be followed alongwithsuggested avoidance / mitigation / enhancement measures.

All the suggested environmental management measures (Table 3.1) need to be followed by theresponsible parties during pre-construction, construction and operation stages of the project.

Operotions Research Group in association with Spatial Decisions3-1


TABLE-3.1: ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT ACTION PLAN

Chainage ResponsibilityEnvironmen for Implementati

tal Assessed Proposed Avoidance, Mitigation and Reference on Time Implementati SupervisionS. No. Parameter Impact Location Measure Enhancement Measures Document Frame on

Pre-construction (PC) Stage

Physical Environment

PC 1. Land PC 1.1 Loss Borrow Pits, Annexure Borrow areas suggested MoRTH: 305.2 Pre- Contractor/ PIUResources of productive Construction VII (Specific are given in Annexure VII. and MoRTH: construction Environmenta

soil camps, EMP) 305.2.2.2 Stage I Expert of SCstorage To ensure minimal loss ofgodowns, fertile and productive PC 1.1 of theHot mix agricultural soil as well as General EMPplants and loss of vegetation, borrowbatching areas are to be selected asplants per specifications of

general EMP.

Refer PC 1.1 of the General Contractor EnvironmentaEMP for measures to I Expert of SCprevent loss of productive and PIUsoil.

PC 1.2 Land Refer PC 1.2 of the General Contractor EnvironmentaUse Change EMP I Expert of SC

and PIU

PC 2. Ambient Air PC 2.1 Dust Entire stretch Refer PC 2.1 of the General During Contractor, EnvironmentaQuality and odour EMP Construction Environmenta I Expert of SC

generation Mobilisation I Expert of SC and PIUPeriod (contractor

and SCtogetherresponsiblefor flyashhandling)





PC 3. Water PC 3.1 Entire stretch Refer PC 3.1 of the General During Contractor SupervisionResources Contaminati EMP Construction Consultant,

on of water Mobilisation PIUresources Period

PC 3.2 Loss Entire stretch Refer PC 3.2 of the General During Contractor, Environmentaof EMP Construction PIU I Expert of SCcommunity Mobilisation and PIUand private Stagewaterresources

Biological Environment

PC 4. Flora Loss of trees Entire stretch Annexure Total of 8812 trees are to PC 4. of the Before Contractor SC and PIU,XiII be cut within the right of General EMP Construction NHAI(Specific way. Trees will be removed StartsEMP) with prior approval from

State Forest Department asmentioned in PC 4. of theGeneral EMP.

Social Environment

PC 5. Land PC 5.1 Corridor of Refer PC 5.1 of the General RAP Document Before NGOs, PIU, NHAIResources Acquisition impact EMP Construction Collaborating

of Land Starts Agencies,PIU

PC 5.2 Corridor of Refer PC 5.2 of the General MoRTH: 110.3 Prior to start Contractor, PIURelocation impact EMP of PIUof constructionCommunity workProperty





PC 5.3 Corridor of Refer PC 5.3 of the General Prior to start Contractor, PIU, NHAIRelocation impact EMP of PIU, NHAIof Cultural constructionProperty workResources

Construction (C) Stage


C 1. Land C 1.1 Loss Borrow Pits, Refer C 1.1 of the General Annexure VI During Contractor EnvironmentaResources of Topsoil Construction EMP (General EMP) Construction I Expert of

sites, Quarry SC, PIUSites etc.

C 1.2 Soil Entire stretch Refer C 1.2 of the General MoRTH: 306.2, During Contractor EnvironmentaErosion EMP MoRTH: Construction I Expert of

Annexure 305.2.2.2 SC, PIUXVII Soil erosion will be(Specific monitored as per the Table 4.2 SC P I U, NHAIEMP) monitoring plan. (General EMP)

C 1.3 Entire stretch Refer C 1.3 of the General MoRTH: 112.6, During Contractor EnvironmentaCompaction EMP MoRTH: Construction I Expert of SCof Soil 305.2.2.2 and PIU,

NHAI

C 1.4 Near Refer C 1.4 of the General MoRTH: 201.2A, During Contractor EnvironmentaContaminati construction EMP MoRTH: 112.2, Construction and SC I Expert of SCon of Soil site, asphalt MoRTH: 112.6, and PIU,

plants etc. MoRTH: 201.2 NHAIand MoRTH:301.3.11

Soil contamination will be Table 4.2 Contractor P I U, NHAImonitored as per the (General EMP) throughmonitoring plan at locations approvedto be identified by the monitoringEngineer. agency





C 2. Ambient Air C Entire Refer C 2.1 of the General MoRTH: 111.5, Contractor EnvironmentaQuality 2.1Generatio Project EMP MoRTH: 111.9, I Expert of SC

n of Dust Stretch MoRTH: 118.1, and PIU,MoRTH: 112.2 NHAI

C 2.2 Entire Refer C 2.2 of the GeneralGeneration Project EMP Contractorof Exhaust Stretch throughGases Air pollution monitoring will approved P I U, NHAI

be carried out as per the Table 4.2 monitoringmonitoring plan of General (General EMP) agencyEMP

C 3. Water C 3.1 Ponds Pond at Km a) Silt fencing to be MoRTH: 306 During Contractor EnvironmentaResources Contaminati 3.410 (Basti provided along pond within Construction I Expert of

on of Water Bypass) the direct impact zone SC, PIU,Resources intercepting highway to NHAI

prevent siltation in waterbody. Such pond will not beimpacted duringconstruction.

Rivers, b) Refer C 3.1 of thecanals, General EMP for additionalponds etc. measures to be taken.

Annexure Ground and surface water Table 4.2 ContractorXVII quality will be monitored as (General EMP) through P I U, NHAI(Specific per the monitoring plan of approvedEMP) General EMP monitoring

agency





C 3.2 Loss Community Enhanceme a) Pond enhancement MoRTH: 301.5 During Contractor Environmentaof Ponds, Hand nt to be measures are to be Construction I Expert ofCommunity Pumps, provided for provided as described in Drawing no. 2 SC, PIU,Water Wells ponds at general EMP. (Specific EMP) NHAIResources Km 3.410 Drawing no. 7

(Basti (General EMP)bypass) b) Roadside wells shall be

enhanced as per generalEMP.

c) Recharge pits will be MoRTH:provided under urban 305.352drains to improve watertable and manage surfacerun off.

C 3.3 Refer C 3.4 of the General During Contractor EnvironmentaDisruption to EMP. construction I Expert ofother users SC, PIU,

NHAI

C 4. Noise Increase in Entire stretch Annexure Noise barriers will be Contractor EnvironmentaEnvironment Sound XVI provided at sensitive I Expert of

Levels (Specific receptor locations. SC, PIU,EMP) NHAI

Noise levels will be Table 4.2 ContractorAnnexure monitored at equipment (General EMP) through P I U, NHAIXVII yards and other locations approved(Specific as per the monitoring plan monitoringEMP) of General EMP. MoRTH: 111.13, agency Environmenta

Refer C4. of the General MoRTH: 111.1, Contractor I Expert ofEMP for other measures to MoRTH: 1 12.4, SC, PIU,mitigate noise levels. MRH304,NHAI

MoRTH: 112.1,MoRTH: 112.5,MoRTH: R a G.5




tal Assessed Proposed Avoidance, Mitigation and Reference on Time Implementati SupervisionS. No. Parameter Impact LocatSion Measure Enhancement Measures Document Frame an


C 5. Flora Loss of Entire project Entire a) Compensatory Forest Durng State Forest PIU, NHAIRoadside stretch project afforestation shall be done Conservation Construction DepartmentPlantation stretch @ 1:2 (for every tree cut, Act, 1980

two trees to be planted). Atotal of 17,624 trees are to Annexure IVbe planted. Planting shall (General EMP)be done as per plantingstrategy descrbed ingeneral EMP.

PIU, NHAIb) Avenue plantation shall C 5. of the During NHAIbe done as per guidelines General EMP Constructionof general EMP. A total of33,000 trees are to beplanted as part of avenueplantation.

Schematic c) Shrubs will be planted in C 5. of the During Environmenta3 (Specific th median along the General EMP Construction Contractor I Expert of SCEMP) project stretch. Total of and PIU,

29,340 shrubs are to beplanted.

C 6. Fauna Poaching of Entire project Refer C 6. of the General During Contractor Environmentaanimals, stretch EMP Construction I Expert of SCfishes, and PIU,accidents NHAIinvolvingdomesticated animalsetc.

Social Environment





C 7. Human C 7.1 Entire Refer C 7.1 of the General MoRTH: 112.4, During Contractor EnvironmentaHealth & Increased Project EMP MoRTH: 112.1, Construction I Expert of SCSafety Accident Stretch MoRTH: 112.5 and PIU

Risks due toHighSpeeds,Increase inVehicularPollution andother workrelated risks.

C 7.2 Labour camp Refer C 7.2 of the General During Contractor EnvironmentaDeterioration and entire EMP Construction I Expert of SCof indoor air project and PIUquality and stretchrisk of waterbornediseases

C 7.3 Loss Refer C 7.3 of the General MoRTH: 112.7 During Contractor Environmentaof Access EMP Construction I Expert of SC

and PIU,NHAI

C 7.4 Health Refer C 7.4 of the General Annexure II During Contractor Environmentaand Hygiene EMP (General EMP) Construction I Expert of SCImpacts on and PIU,Construction NHAICamps

C 7.5 Risk Refer C 7.5 of the General MoRTH: 106 During Contractor Environmentafrom EMP Construction I Expert of SCElectrical and PIUEquipment(s)





C 7.6 Refer C 7.7 of the General MoRTH: 301.5 During Contractor EnvironmentaImpacts on EMP Construction I Expert of SCCultural and PIUProperty

Other Activities

C 8. Orientation The PIU shall organize Annexure V During Pre PIU, NHAI ESDA, NHAIneed of orientation sessions during (General EMP) ConstructionImplementin all stages of the project for andg Agency staff of Environmental Cell, Constructionand field level implementationContractor staff of PIU, Environmental

Expert of SC andContractor.

Operation (0) Stage


0 1. Ambient Air Increase in Project Annexure Monitoring will be done as Table 4.2: During NHAI NHAIQuality Concentratio stretch XVII per the monitoring plan of (General EMP) Operation

n of (Specific General EMP at selectPollutants in EMP) locations.Ambient Air

02. Water Contaminati Project Monitoring will be done as Table 4.2: During NHAI NHAIResources on of Water stretch per the monitoring plan of (General EMP) Operation

Resources General EMP at rivers andculverts.

0 3. Noise Increased Sensitive Annexure Noise monitoring will be Table 4.2: During NHAI NHAIEnvironment Noise due to Receptor XVII done at select locations to (General EMP) Operation

High Locations (Specific check efficacy of the noiseSpeeding EMP) barriers.Vehicles





04. Soil 0 4.1 Soil Entire project Annexure Monitoring will be done as Table 4.2: During NHAI NHAIerosion stretch XVII per the monitoring plan of (General EMP) Operation

(Specific General EMP at selectEMP) locations.

0 4.2 Soil Entire project Soil contamination shall be Table 4.2: During NHAI NHAIcontaminatio stretch monitored at accident or (General EMP) Operationn spill locations as per the

monitoring plan of theGeneral EMP.


O 5. Flora Loss of Flora Entire project NHAI shall be responsible Table 4.2: During NHAI NHAIstretch for monitoring survival rate (General EMP) Operation

of all plantations as part ofcompensatory afforestation,avenue plantation andalong median for a periodof five years.



4. ENVIRONMENTALMONITORING PLAN

The environmental monitoring programme is devised to ensure effective implementation of the EMP.The following table provides locations to be monitored at different stages of the project. The frequency,duration, parameters to be monitored, institutional responsibility, reporting system etc. need to bereferred from the general EMP.

TABLE 4.1: LOCATIONS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING

S.No. Environmental Component Project Stage Location

1 Ambient Air Quality Construction Hot mix plant / batching plant (max. of 12 samples)

Construction sites in tandem with construction(max. of 24 samples)

Operation Ch. 169.700 (Harriya junction), 182.000 (Kaptanganj market), 198.000 (Basti bypass), 203.800(Rudholi)

2 Ground Water Quality Construction Ch. 170.000 (Harriya), 178.025 (Maharaj ganj),182.000 (Kaptan ganj)

Surface Water Quality Ch. 168.200 (Mayderma river), 194.400 (Kwanoriver), 199.400 (pond)

Surface Water Quality Operation Rivers and Culverts (max. of 12 samples)

3 Ambient Noise Levels Construction Equipment Yards (max. of 36 samples)

Ch. 169.700 (Harriya junction), 182.000 (Kaptanganj market), 203.800 (Karhi junction)

Operation Ch. 170.850 (school), 184.200 (college), 202.800(school)

4 Soil Contamination Construction Productive agricultural lands abutting traffic detoursand traffic diversions (max. of 9 samples)

Operation Accident / spill locations involving bulk transportcarrying hazardous materials (max. of 3 samples)

5 Soil Erosion Construction Ch. 168.200 (Mayderma river), 194.400 (Kwanoriver), 199.400 (pond)

Operation Ch. 168.200 (Mayderma river), 194.400 (Kwanoriver), 199.400 (pond)


i

I

i


5. ENVIRONMENTALMANAGEMENT BUDGET

The environmental budget for various environmental management measures proposed in the EMP isdetailed in Table 5.1. There are several other environmental issues that have been addressed as partof good engineering practices, the costs for which have been accounted for in the Engineering Costs.Environmental management budget is split into four categories- Mitigation Measures, EnhancementMeasures, Environmental Monitoring and Institutional Capacity Strengthening. The estimated costunder each category for the project stretch is as follows:

1. Mitigation cost = Rs 3,70,27,000

2. Enhancement cost = Rs 7,00,000

3. Environmental Monitoring cost = Rs 5,53,500

4. Institutional Capacity Strengthening Cost = Rs 4,94,750 (Cost of independent compliancemonitoring and cost of equipments and facilities at PIU is shared with other packages, and isnot included in this package)

The total Environmental Mitigation, Enhancement, Monitoring and Institutional Capacity Strengtheningcosts are estimated to be around Rs. 38.78 million.


i

iIii

iiiiI

ii

INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIAL ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND CONSOLIDATION OF FINAL SPECIFIC EMP

EIA EMP AND RAP REPORTS FOR AYODHYA TO MUZAFFARPUR SECTION OF EAST WEST CORRIDOR

Table 5.1: Environmental Budget for Package II (Km 164.000 - Km 208.000)

Component Stage Item Reference Document Unit Unit Cost Quantity Total CostI I ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~(INR) (INR)

MITIGATION MEASURES

Pre - Relocation of hand pumps and provision of taps Covered in RAP/Engg costconstruction

Water Recharge pits under urban drains (urban drains Drawing no. 3 No 22,500 24 540,00Construction given in locations with service roads) (General EMP)Construction

Silt fencing at water bodies running meters 400 50 20,00

Type B Noise barriers at sensitive locations running meters 2,860 110 314,600

Type B Noise barriers at sensitive locations: No. 5,000 4 20,00Construction of sideways gate ,

Noise Operation Annexure XVI(Specific EMP)

Type C Noise barriers at sensitive locations running metres 2,860 300 858,00

Type C Noise barriers at sensitive locations: No. 5,000 12 60,00Construction of sideways gate

Providing Oil Interceptors (at vehicle parking Drawing no, 5areas and construction yard for mitigation as (General EMP) No. 50,000 2 100,00

Soil Construction per directions of the Engineer)

Erosion control along high embankments Covered in Engineering Cost

Cultural Pre- Relocation of Shrnes, Temples and other Covered in Social Impact Assessment BudgetProperties Construction properties

Tree cutting and haulage upto depot (To be done by the contractor):

<120 cm girth size and upto 50 km tead till No. 200 3084 616,800depot point

Pre- < 120 cm girth size and upto 100 km lead till No. 300 3084 925,20Construction upto depot point

> 120 cm girth size and upto 50 km lead till No. 300 1322 396,60depot point

Flora > 120 cm girth size and upto 100 km lead till No. 400 1322 528,80depot point

Compensatory afforestation (To be executed by No. 500 17624 8,812,00the State Forest Department)

Construction Avenue plantation (To be executed by the No. 500 33,000 16,500,00N HAl)

Median plantation (To be executed by the Schematic 3 (Specific N.25 2930 73,0Contractor, ensurng 90% survival and EMP) No. 250 29,340 7,335,00maintenance upto defect liability period)

Culverts Construction Cleaning of Culverts Covered in Engineering Cost

Restoration of construction sites at diversions,Site restoration Constn workers camps and construction yard and Covered in Engineerng Cost

Construction ~~disposal of spoil

Safety ConstrucItion Crash barriers, tencing of service roads, Covered in Engineering Costretaining walls and other road safety measures

TOTAL MITIGATION COST | 37,027,00

Operations RF- G u' ---- sp _ n.-ENHANCEMENT MEASURES

INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIAL ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND CONSOLIDATION OF FINAL SPECIFIC EMPEIA, EMP AND RAP REPORTS FOR AYODHYA TO MUZAFFARPUR SECTION OF EAST WEST CORRIDOR

Component Stage Item Reference Document Unit (UnitCRo) Quantity Total Co(

Enhancement I Rehabilitation of ponds (Specfic EMP) No. 350,000 1 350,00

Water Construction (Specific EMP)

Enhancement of road side wells Drawing no 7 Lumpsum 350,00(

TOTAL ENHANCEMENT COST 700,00

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING

Monitorng near all hot mix plant locations Air Sample 6,000 12 72,00Monitoring of Air approved by the Engineer

Quality Construction

Parameters e.g. Monitonng at construction sites in tandem with Air Sample 2,000 24 48,00SPM, RSPM, construction

S02. N Ox etc. Operation At sensitive receptor locations (Specifc EMP) Air Sample 6,000 12 72,00

Ground water at specific locations (Specixc EMP) Water Sample 5,000 9 45,00(Water Quality Construction (pcfcEP

Parameters e g Surface water at specific locations (Specinc EMP) Water Sample 5,000 9 45,00

etc.

Operation At Rivers and culverts for one year Water Sample 5,000 12 60,00

At equipment yards as directed by the Engineer Noise Sample 1,000 36 36,00

ConstructionNoise At sensitive receptor locations Annexure XVII Noise Sample 1,000 27 27,000

(Specific EMP)

Operation At sensitive receptor locations (Specifc EMP) Noise Sample 1,000 9 9,00

Construction At productive agrcultural lands abutting traffic To be identified by the Soil Sample 6,000 9 54,00Soil detours and traffic diversions Engineer

Contamination Operation At accident / spill locations involving bulk As per the occurrence Soil Sample 6,000 3 18,00

transport carrying hazardous materals of such incidents

Construction Silt load in ponds, water courses (SpAeifc EMP) Water Course 2,500 18 45,001

Soil Erosion

Operation Silt load in ponds, water courses Annexucf XVE I Water Course 2,500 9 22,50t

TOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING COST 553,500

INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY STRENGTHENING

Training and Durng Training programmes as well as administrativeTraining and Construction charges including logistics as defined in General EMP Lumpsum 494,75

Mobilisation and Operation General EMP

Independent

Monitoring for Dunng Common for all packages and provision has Will be shared with Construction packages of

EMP ConstDuction been kept under Construction packages of General EMP Gorakhpur BypassCompliance Gorakhpur Bypass

Status

Facilities and Durng Common for all packages and provision has Will be shared with Construction Packages ofEquipmntes and Construction been kept under Construction packages of Gorakhpur Bypass

and Operation Gorakhpur Bypass

TOTAL TRAINING AND MOBILISATION COST 494,750

Operations R search Group in association -tl;jr 1i;cg tion + Enhancement + Environmental Monitoring + Institutional Capacity Strengthening Costs) 38,775,250

TOTAL EMP COST FOR PACKAGE II | 38,775,250


Annexure I

Proposed Alignment of Four Lane Carriageway (Package II, Km.164.000 to Km. 208.000)

Proposed Alignment Arrangement

S. Design Chainage Alignment Arrangement

No.From To

1 2 3 4

1 164.000 164.900 Concentrc

2. 164.900 166.800 Eccentrc to Right

3. 166.800 168.400 Eccentric to Right

4. 168.400 170.600 Concentric

5. 170.600 191.800 Concentric


7. 194.755 197.200 Concentric



II

i

I

I

Ii

It


Annexure 11

Proposed Service Roads

S. Design Chainage Width (in m) Place Location Length of Total Length (inNo. One side (in Km)

From To Km)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1. 168.600 170.600 5.50 Harrya Both 2.000 4.000

1 1 ~~~~~~~~~~~Sides2. 177.755 179.000 5.50 Maharajganj Both 1.245 2.490

Sides

3. 181.100 182.000 5.50 Kaptanganj Both 0.900 1.800Sides

4. 184.100 184.700 5.50 Near Katri Both 0.600 1.200Sides

5. 187.500 188.000 5.50 Gotwa Both 0.500 1.000Sides

6. 190.000 190.650 5.50 Basahwa Both 0.650 1.300Sides

7. 194.755 197.200 5.50 Basti Bypass Both 2.445 4.890Sides

8. 203.200 204.350 5.50 Handia Both 1.150 2.300Sides


I

i

iI

IiiIiI

it

IiI

I

I

i


Annexure III

Proposed Highway Junction Improvements

S. Km Junction Type of Proposed ImprovementNo. Name Junction

1. 169.680 Babhram Jn. Major At -Grade with channelising island

2. 196.629 Barevan Jn. Major Highway grade separators withoutramps

3. 201.067 Chanpuras Major At -Grade with channelising islandJn.

4. 203.765 Harriya Jn. Major At -Grade with channelising island


IiItfII

I

I

I

II

i


Annexure IVDetails of Proposed Underpasses

S. No Km. Place Type of Proposed SpanProposed Arrangement ofUnderpass Under-pass

1 . Pedestran 7.5m x 2.5m.170.120 Harraiya Underpasses

2. Pedestrian 7.5m x 2.5m.171.888 Harraiya Underpasses

3. 178.05 .Maharajganj Pedestrian 7.5m x 2.5m178.025 MaharajganJ Underpasses

4. . Pedestrian 7.5m x 2.5m181.485 Kaptanganj Underpasses

5. 187.685 Gotwa Pedestrian 7.5m x 2.5m5. 187.685 Gotwa Underpasses

6. 188.040 Gotwa Rithia Pedestrian 7.5m x 2.5mUnderpasses

7. . Pedestrian 7.5m x 2.5m.192.250 Rithia Underpasses

8. . Pedestrian 7.5m x 2.5m195.187 Basti Underpasses

Details of Proposed Vehicular Underpass (Size 10m x 5m)

Km. Location

201.061 Rudholi

Operations Research Group in association with Spafial Decisions

INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL & SOCIAL ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND CONSOLIDATION OF

EIA, EMP AND RAP REPORTS FOR AYODHYA TO MUZAFFARPUR SECTION OF EAST WEST CORRIDOR FINAL SPECIFIC EMP

Annexure VExisting Major and Minor Bridges

S. Bridge No. Chainage Major / MinorNo.

1. 169/1 168 Minor

2. 178/2 177 Minor

3. 195/2 194 Major

4. 4/2 3 of Basti Bypass Minor





Annexure VIProposed Improvement / Construction of Bridges and Culverts

Bridges

Construction of New two lane Bridges:

Major Bridges = 1 Nos.

Minor Bridges = 4 Nos.

Culverts

There are 82 nos. of existing culverts in this package. Summary of the types are outlined below.

S. Type of Existing Culvert Nos.No.

1. Slab Culvert 21

2. Hume Pipe Culvert 58

3. Arch type Culvert 3

Total 82

Slab culverts to be replaced = None

Hume Pipe culverts to be replaced = 23 Nos.

Arch culverts to be replaced = 3 Nos.


i

Ii

IIi


Annexure VIl

Proposed Borrow Areas

QuantityNo. Location Distance from NH Name of Village Private/ Govt. Land Available

No. (in Km.) (in cum.)

1. 170+000 1.0 Thana Village Private 65,000

2. 178+000 1.5 Maharajganj Private 20,000

3. 191+300 0.2 Basawa Village Private 250,000

4. 192+100 0.2 Basawa Village Private 45,000

5. 199+500 2.0 Madhakpur Village Private 175,000

6. 206+500 1.5 Parsa Jagar Private 105,000Village


II

I

iIiii

I


Annexure VIIIAmbient Air Quality Monitoring Results

S. No. Location Zone Suspended Sulphur NitrogenParticulate Dioxide Dioxide

Matter (S02), (NOx),(SPM), micro micro

micro gm gm per gm perper cum cum cum

1. Harraiya (Basti) Rural cum 162.24 6.24 13.52Residential

2. Maharajganj Rural cum 142.66 5.80 9.44(Basti) Residential



Annexure IX

Details of Ponds within the Direct Impact Zone

Distance from EnhancementS. No. Chainage Location Existing Pavement being Proposed

Edge (in)

1. Km 3.410, Basti Bypass LHS 3.25 Yes


i

iI

I

I

IIii

INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL & SOCIAL ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND CONSOLIDATION OFEIA, EMP AND PAP REPORTS FOR AYODHYA TO MUZAFFARPUR SECTION OF EAST WEST CORRIDOR FINAL SPECIFIC EMP

Annexure X

Surface Water Quality Monitoring Results

Sampling Station

Kwano River (Basti)

Parameters

pH 7.64

Total Dissolved Solids 162

Total Hardness as 222

(CaCO3 )

Calcium (as Ca") 40.08

Chlorides (as Cl-) 19

Nitrate Nitrogen 0.18

Sulphate (as SO 42-) 5.8

B.O.D. (After 3 days incubation at 1.0270C)

C.O.D. (Potassium Dichromate 10Reflux Method)

Alkalinity (as CaCO3) 226

Total Coliform (MPN/100ml) 60

Dissolved Oxygen 7.9

Oil and Grease BDL


iIII

I

II

I

II

I


Annexure XiGround Water Quality Monitoring Results

Sampling Station

Mahrajganj HarraiyaParameter

(Basti) (Basti)

pH 7.69 7.88

Total Dissolved Solids 160 265

Total Hardness as (CaCO3) 248 270

Calcium (as Ca") 52.10 59

Chlorides (as Cl-) 20 33

Nitrate Nitrogen 0.20 2.6

Sulphate (as S042 - 8.2 16

B.O.D. (After 3 days 1.0 3.2incubation at 270C)

C.O.D. (Potassium 11 20Dichromate Reflux Method)

Alkalinity (as CaCO3) 250 230

Total Coliform (MPN/100ml) 4 30

Fecal Coliform (MPN/100ml) NIL 10

Oil and Grease BDL BDL


i

I

iI

I

i


Annexure XIIAmbient Noise Level Monitoring Results

S.No. Location Zone Noise Level (LeqdB(A)) Day time

1 Maharajganj (Basti) Commercial Cum 57(Basti) ~~Residential

2. Harraiya (Basti) Commercial Cum 63Residential


I ---- --


Annexure Xill

Number of Trees to be Cut and Saved due to Proposed Alignment

Trees Right side within ROW

km Gl G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 G7 Total

164.0 To 165.0 14 23 15 5 11 7 75

165.0 To 170.0 115 180 163 74 14 50 51 647

170.0 To 192.0 363 462 764 395 110 317 234 2645

192.0 To 195.0 69 109 21 24 6 30 20 279

195.0To 197.0 13 3 10 9 4 2 41

Basti Bypass - 1 1 20.0 To 3.6

Basti Bypass- 3 6 4 4 2 3 6 283.6 To 5.0

201.0 To 208.0 2261 2497 1466 639 335 251 260 7709

Total 11426

Trees Left side within ROW

km Gl G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 G7 Total

164.0 To 165.0 11 50 44 22 5 12 12 156

165.0 To 170.0 219 332 148 87 40 67 46 939

170.0 To 192.0 287 485 399 290 156 216 267 2100

192.0 To 195.0 62 57 25 18 13 24 3 202

195.0To 197.0 10 4 9 11 2 3 1 40

Basti Bypass - 4 9 7 5 5 4 340.0 To 3.6

Basti Bypass- 4 8 9 8 293.6 To 5.0

201.0 To 208.0 1243 2172 2062 905 207 390 195 7174

Total 10674

Grand Total 22100



Trees affected due to widening

Trees affected Left side for concentric widening

km GI G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 G7 Total

164.0 To 165.0 16 33 22 9 13 7 100

168.5 To 170.0 1 3 13 19 5 19 9 69

170.0 To 178.0 60 100 160 75 25 108 84 612

178.0 To 181.0 91 110 152 67 5 26 36 487

181.0 To 192.0 174 206 387 203 64 154 109 1297

195.0 To 197.0 10 3 9 10 2 2 1 37

206.0 To 207.0 60 183 108 9 3 31 3 397

Total 2999

Trees affected Right side for concentric widening

km GI G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 G7 Total

164.0 To 165.0 13 54 46 25 6 12 12 168

168.5 To 170.0 11 12 7 9 10 27 9 85

170.0 To 178.0 92 139 93 68 46 48 88 574

178.0 To 181.0 57 89 75 40 23 29 31 344

181.0 To 192.0 164 296 257 194 92 142 148 1293

195.0 To 197.0 13 3 8 7 4 4 39

206.0 To 207.0 209 100 29 11 17 3 6 375

Total 2878

Trees Affected Right Side for Right side Widening

Km Gl G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 | G7 Total

165.0 To 166.0 70 78 24 26 6 12 23 239

166.0 To 168.5 146 256 120 60 24 29 14 649

192.0 To 195.0 68 60 26 20 13 25 4 216

0.0 To 3.6 1 1 2

3.6 To 5.0 3 6 4 3 2 3 6 27

201.0 To 206.0 619 547 249 78 19 26 22 1560

207.0 To 208.0 144 48 30 10 6 3 1 242


INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL & SOCIAL ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND CONSOLIDATION OF

EIA, EMP AND RAP REPORTS FOR AYODHYA TO MUZAFFARPUR SECTION OF EAST WEST CORRIDOR FINAL SPECIFIC EMP

Km T Gl G2 G3 G4 | G5 G6 G7 Total

Total 2935

Grand Total 8812

Gl: 30 - 60 cm G2: 60 - 90 cm G3: 90 - 120 cm G4: 120 -150 cm

G5: 150 - 180 cm G6: 180 - 270 cm



Annexure XIV

Sensitive Receptors within the Direct Impact Zone

S. No. Chainage Name of Structure Location Distance fromExisting

PavementEdge (m)

1. 164.1 Vedmata Gayatri Shishu Mandir LHS 10.6

2. 165.1 KRS Lovely Flower Co-ed Junior High LHS 16School

3. 168.56 Gajadhar Singh Angad Singh Academy LHS 18.8

4. 168.6 Calvary Ideal School and Hostel LHS 15.9

5. 168.95 Siddharth Shiskh Sansthan LHS 19.75

6. 170.5 Poova Madhyamik Vidyalaya LHS 10.6

7. 170.85 Shri RS Choudhary Vani Vidya Mandir LHS 18.85

8. 172.2 Surendra Bal Vidya Mandir RHS 18

9. 172.35 Saraswati Bal Vidya Mandir LHS 25.75

10. 173.1 Saraswati Gyan Mandir LHS 18.1

11. 174.6 SD Children Academy LHS 26

12. 178.2 Junior High School LHS 9.15

13. 181 Prathmik Swasthya Kendra (Hospital) RHS 10.3

14. 181.4 Swargiya Suryadutt Tripathi Indira Gandhi LHS 19.2Inter college

15. 181.55 Public Convent School RHS 10.65

16. 181.6 Public Convent School (2nd Branch) LHS 15.30

17. 181.6 Public Convent School (2rd Branch) RHS 15.50

18. 181.9 Larsa Public School RHS 19.9

19. 184.2 Srimati Ramrati Devi Garhmukh RHS 18Vishvavidyalaya

20. 184.35 Sansknt Madhyamik Vidyalaya LHS 14.3

21. 184.6 Janta Inter college LHS 8.55

22. 184.7 Ideal Children Academy LHS 19.4

23. 184.8 Ramdhani singh Nehra Devi Rajkiya LHS 14.1Mahavidyalaya

24. 187.76 SwatibalaVidya Mandir RHS 3.75

25. 188 Royal Convent School RHS 14.4

26. 188.3 Kissan Inter College LHS 11.25

27. 188.5 GPM Convent School LHS 18.15

28. 190.5 Captain SD singh Uchcha Madhymik RHS 14.75



S. No. Chainage Name of Structure Location Distance fromExisting

PavementEdge (m)

Vidyalaya

29. 190.85 Siddharth Shanti Niketan LHS 14.2

30. 202.8 Vinay Shiksha Niketan LHS 8.55

31. 206.7 Montessori School RHS 19.9



Annexure XV

Proposed Parking Areas

S. No. Km./ Location Size of ParkingChainage Area in m2

1. 204.400 Both sides 14000



Annexure XVINoise Barriers

Specific noise barriers are being proposed for sensitive receptor locations.

PROPOSED NOISE BARRIERS FOR SENSITIVE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS

Noise Barrier Type Criteria of Selection Proposed Action

Type A No space availability within RoW Double-glazing of window panes.

Type B Boundary wall gets impacted Noise barrier as 3.0 m high plasteredwithin the RoW brick wall. Gate entry, if facing highway

to be shifted sideways

Type C Space availability within the Row Noise barrier as 3.0 m high plasteredbut boundary wall does not get brick wall. This would also serve asimpacted boundary wall. Gate entry if facing the

highway to be shifted.

NOISE MITIGATION MEASURES AT SPECIFIC SENSITIVE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS

S. No. Chainage Name Location ProposedNoise Barrier

Type

1. 165.1 KRS Lovely Flower Co-ed Junior High LHS Type CSchool

2. 168.56 Gajadhar Singh Angad Singh Academy LHS Type B

3. 168.95 Siddharth Shiskh Sansthan LHS Type C

4. 170.85 Shri RS Choudhary Vani Vidya Mandir LHS Type C

5. 172.2 Surendra Bal Vidya Mandir RHS Type C

6. 173.1 Saraswati Gyan Mandir LHS Type C

7. 178.2 Junior High School LHS Type B

8.a 181.6 Public Convent School (2nd Branch) LHS Type C

8.b 181.6 Public Convent School (3rd Branch) RHS Type C

9. 184.2 Srimati Ramrati Devi Garhmukh RHS Type BVishvavidyalaya

10. 184.8 Ramdhani singh Nehra Devi Rajkiya LHS Type CMahavidyalaya

11. 188.3 Kissan Inter College LHS Type C

12. 188.5 GPM Convent School LHS Type C

13. 190.5 Captain SD singh Uchcha Madhymik RHS Type BVidyalaya

14. 190.85 Siddharth Shanti Niketan LHS Type C

15. 202.8 Vinay Shiksha Niketan LHS Type C


I

II

I

I

INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL & SOCIAL ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND CONSOLIDATION OFEIA, EMP AND RAP REPORTS FOR AYOOHYA TO MUZAFFARPUR SECTION OF EAST WEST CORRIDOR FINAL SPECIFIC EMP

Annexure XVIIProposed Environmental Monitoring Locations

Environmental Project Stage Parameters Location (Chainage)

Component

Ambient Air During Operation SPM, RSPM, S02, NOX, 169.700 (Harriya

CO, HC junction), 182.000(Kaptan ganj market),198.000 (Basti bypass),203.800 (Rudholi)

Ground Water Quality During Construction pH, BOD, COD, TDS, 170.000 (Harriya),

TSS, DO, Oil & Grease, 178.025 (Maharaj ganj),

Pb 182.000 (Kaptan ganj)

Surface Water Quality During Construction pH, BOD, COD, TDS, 168.200 (Mayderma

TSS, DO, Oil & Grease, river), 194.400 (Kwano

Pb river), 199.400 (pond)

Noise Level During Construction Noise Levels on dB (A) 169.700 (Harriya

scale junction), 182.000(Kaptan ganj market),

203.800 (Karhi junction)

During Operation Noise Levels on dB (A) 170.850 (school), 184.200

scale (college), 202.800(school)

Soil Erosion During Construction Silt load in ponds, water 168.200 (Mayderma

courses river), 194.400 (Kwano

river), 199.400 (pond)

During Operation Silt load in ponds, water 168.200 (Mayderma

courses river), 194.400 (Kwanoriver), 199.400 (pond)


i

II

i

i

iIi

j


Schematic 1: Location and Lead of Borrow areas - Package II

RHS Stretch Starts at 164.000 LHS

1 km offThana Vill.65,000 cu. m

Km. 170.000

1.5 kmoffMaharaj Ganj20,000 cu. m

Km 178.000

1.5 km offVill. Basawa250,000 cu. m

Km 191.300 -

Km 192.100 ---

45,000 cu. m



2km offVill. Madhak Pur

Km 199.500 175,000 cu. m

1.5 km offVill. Parsa Jagar105,000 cu. m

Km 206.500

Stretch Ends at Km. 208.000



Type C

Schematic 2: Suggested Specific Noise Barriers - Package 11 SchoolKm. 165.1 00

RHS Stretch Starts at Km. 164.000 LHS

/ ffi :< ~Type B|School

Km. 172.500 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Km 18.6

Type C ~ Type CSchool IKm. 168.950

Km.S172.200 l Type CTye.

Km. 181.600 0 School~~~~~~~~~Scoo

; ~~~~~~~Km. 170.850

Km.K17m. 1 .60

Type B s.m 181.00 Type C

College UniversityKm. 184.200 _Km. 184.800

School 0 \ > S

Km. 202.800 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~m 13.0Km.190.500 \ \ | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Schoo l

Stretch ends at Km. 208.000

Operations Research Group in associotion with Spatil Decisions

Km. 181.600 School~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I

iI

i

iI

I

iI

Iiii


Schematic 3: Median Plantation - Package 11

Stretch Starts at Km. 164.000RHS Km 164.0 LHS

Km 164.9

Km 170.6

Km 191.80

Stretch ends at Km. 208.000

Legend: _ Double Row of ShrubsSingle Row of Shrubs


I

II

I

I

i

I

f

i

I

iI

iIi

iI

I

LEGEND

Gonda MAJOR BUILT-UP LOCATIONPROJECT STRETCH (NH 28)

OTHER NATIONAL HIGHWAY

r MAJOR METALLED ROAD

_ -uthority of irldia | . | | 0UNMETALLED ROADDISTRICT BOUNDARY

-DRAINAGES

WATERBODIES

-Basti

SCALE 1,200,000

G 2 4 BNational Highwaiys ~KilometersAuthority of India

environmental management plan - world...

Documents