eu expert group on hspa - · pdf fileeu expert group on hspa conclusions and recommendations...

16
EU Expert Group on HSPA Conclusions and recommendations of the report on quality of care HSPA seminar on quality measurement Ljubljana, 28 September 2016 Federico Paoli

Upload: vodiep

Post on 18-Feb-2018

226 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • EU Expert Group on HSPA Conclusions and recommendations

    of the report on quality of care

    HSPA seminar on quality measurement Ljubljana, 28 September 2016

    Federico Paoli

  • 2

    In February 2014, the Council Work Party on Public Health at Senior Level invited Member States and the Commission to set up an Expert Group on HSPA.

    Our Mission 1. Provide participating Member States with a

    forum for exchange of experience on the use of HSPA at national level.

    2. Support national policy-makers by identifying tools and methodologies for developing HSPA.

    3. Define criteria and procedures for selecting priority areas for HSPA at national and EU level.

    4. Intensify EU cooperation with international organisations, in particular the OECD and the WHO.

    Terms of reference

  • 3

    In February 2014, the Council Work Party on Public Health at Senior Level invited Member States and the Commission to set up an Expert Group on HSPA.

    Terms of reference

    28 EU Member States

    +

    Norway

    OECD WHO

    European

    Observatory

  • Selection of priority topics (2015)

    4

    Quality of care Integrated care

    Effectiveness of care

    Primary care Chronic diseases

    management

    Access Patient experience

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    110

  • Quality report

    Five meetings between November 2014 and December

    2015 + 1 policy focus group

    April 2016

  • Quality of care

    Section 1: General findings

    I. Background, assumptions, and goals II. Main findings from countries' experiences III. Interpreting cross-country variation in quality indicators VI. Conclusions

    Section 2: Countries' experiences

    Strategies across Europe to assess quality of care

  • 7

    Reference framework

  • Quality of care

    Section 1: General findings

    I. Background, assumptions, and goals II. Main findings from countries' experiences III. Interpreting cross-country variation in quality indicators VI. Conclusions

    Section 2: Countries' experiences

    Strategies across Europe to assess quality of care

  • So what?

    Main findings from countries experiences

    Whom to address quality assessment reporting to?

    How are the findings of quality assessment presented?

    General challenges in using quality assessment for policy action

    Quality assessment to support legal or strategic initiatives

    Use of indicators for quality and organisational improvement

    Quality assessment for benchmarking

    Main findings

    9

  • Quality of care

    Section 1: General findings

    I. Background, assumptions, and goals II. Main findings from countries' experiences III. Interpreting cross-country variation in quality indicators VI. Conclusions

    Section 2: Countries' experiences

    Strategies across Europe to assess quality of care

  • 11

    Few reflections:

    Robust indicator

    But, caution in interpreting data

    Catalyst for further in-depth within-country analysis

    To be combined with other data (to monitor quality of care for diabetes patients)

    It also provides some information on (depending from the context):

    Secondary/hospital care

    Integration of care

    Socio-economic status

    But, caution in interpreting data

    So what? Interpreting

    variations

  • Quality of care

    Section 1: General findings

    I. Background, assumptions, and goals II. Main findings from countries' experiences III. Interpreting cross-country variation in quality indicators VI. Conclusions

    Section 2: Countries' experiences

    Strategies across Europe to assess quality of care

  • So what?

    1. Quality assessment is a piece of a bigger puzzle

    Put quality into a broader framework

    Adopt large boundaries for health systems

    Define the level and goal of quality assessment

    Define targets and benchmarks

    Independence between the assessment phases

    Put the patient at the centre

    Lessons learnt

    13

  • 2. Choice of indicators and concerns on data quality

    Indicators only indicate

    Complement process with outcome indicators

    Use of old data reduce their explanatory power

    Rely on powerful health information systems

    14

    So what? Lessons learnt

  • 3. Communicate results and follow them up

    Present findings which are easy to read and understand

    Share assessment findings transparently

    Present concrete recommendations

    15

    So what? Lessons learnt

  • EU Expert Group on Health Systems Performance Assessment

    http://ec.europa.eu/health/systems_performance_assessment/policy/expert_group/index_en.htm

    http://ec.europa.eu/health/systems_performance_assessment/policy/expert_group/index_en.htmhttp://ec.europa.eu/health/systems_performance_assessment/policy/expert_group/index_en.htmhttp://ec.europa.eu/health/systems_performance_assessment/policy/expert_group/index_en.htmhttp://ec.europa.eu/health/systems_performance_assessment/policy/expert_group/index_en.htm