e.u.decision(1)
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/12/2019 E.U.decision(1)
1/2
DECISION OF THE COURT (special Chamber provided for in Aricle !"#b of he R$les
of %roced$re&
' Febr$ar ")!!
(Revie*&
In Case C+!,-!! R./
%RO%OSA0 TO RE1IE2 made b he Firs Advocae 3eneral/ $nder Aricle 4" of he
Sa$e of he Co$r of 5$sice of he E$ropean Union/ on !" 5an$ar ")!!/
THE COURT (special Chamber provided for in Aricle !"#b of he R$les of %roced$re of
he Co$r&/
composed of 16 S7o$ris/ %residen/ A6 Ti88ano (Rappore$r&/ 56N6 C$nha Rodri9$es/ :6
0enaers and 56+C6 ;onicho/ %residens of Chambers/
ma7es he follo*in9
Decision
! The proposal o revie* made b he Firs Advocae 3eneral concerns he 5an$ar "))> in Case
F+>'-),Petrilliv Commission6
" The ' %Bergaderm and Goupil v Commission")))B ECR I+@">!&/ i is ar9$ed ha heCo$r has ho*ever no e r$led on *heher he specific na$re of lii9aion in saff cases
arisin9 from Aricle ",) TFEU and Aricles >) and >! of he Saff Re9$laions of
-
8/12/2019 E.U.decision(1)
2/2
Officials of he E$ropean Comm$niies