evaluating the effectiveness of the food program & ust program at santa clara county deh
DESCRIPTION
Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Food Program & UST Program at Santa Clara County DEH. By: Michelle Santos University of San Francisco December 5 , 2013. Santa Clara County Department of Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Compliance Division (SCC DEH HMCD). Background. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Food Program & UST Program at Santa Clara County DEH
By: Michelle Santos
University of San Francisco
December 5, 2013
Background
Santa Clara County Department of Environmental Health
Hazardous Materials Compliance Division
(SCC DEH HMCD)
Objectives
• 1) Clearly identify the goals of the programs within DEH
• 2) Identify methods and metrics for evaluating the effectiveness of DEH programs in meeting their goals
• 3) Gather and analyze data related to program effectiveness
• 4) Provide an Excel model that allows the DEH to evaluate current and future trends in program effectiveness
Programs
• Food Program (FP) • UST Program- Part of the Consumer Protection Division
- Recreational pools and spas, land use, drinking water, certified farmers markets, etc.
- Specifically Food Safety- Grocery stores, liquor stores, bakeries,
restaurants, mobile food facilities, etc.
- conduct routine and follow-up inspections- investigate complaints and suspected
foodborne illnesses- Carry out food recalls- Conduct multi-lingual food safety classes,- Conduct plan reviews for new and
remodeled facilities- Issues permits.
Food Program
* Major risk factor violations & Foodborne Illness Complaints
Specific major risk factor violations that were most predictive of foodborne illness
complaints
Food Program (cont’d.)
497,449 violations TOTAL390 Foodborne Illness Investigations
-15,088 Facilities
473,225 NOT linked to 014 investigation/s-14,792 Facilities
24,224 linked to 014 investigation/s-296 Facilities
16,016 Major Violations-5,154 Facilities
-11,439 Serial Numbers
846 Major Violations without valid 014 within 6 months-223 Facilities
-616 Serial Numbers
95 Major Violations w/ valid 014 within
6 months-53 Facilities
-74 Serial Numbers
Data
0
10
20
30 27
14 13
Top 3 Major Risk Factor Violations Linked to Foodborne Illness Investigations
Nu
mb
er o
f v
iola
tio
ns
Programs
• Food Program (FP) • UST Program- Part of HMCD
- Hazardous materials business plans, toxic gas storage, hazardous materials compliance, etc.
- Specifically UST Program- Gas stations
- conduct routine and follow-up inspections
- Operating permit- Leak detection systems- Financial responsibility
UST Program
Decrease in the number of leaks/spills and the duration of each case
UST Program (cont’d.)
LOP data (FY 2008-2013)-34 cases
Count of substances released Ratio of cases
completed to cases still open
Average duration of each case
2008 2009 2010 2011 20120
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
2 3 3 1 2
321
203
555
447
274
Count of Substance Releases and Their Average Number of Days Open (2008-2013)
Count of Substance Releases
Average # Days Open
2008 2009 2010 2011 20120%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
100%
75% 75%
50% 50%
0%
25%25%
50% 50%
Percentage of Cases Completed vs. Open
Percentage Not Completed
Percentage Completed
497,449 violations TOTAL-15,088 Facilities
2, 463 Violations Under PE 2399 (Underground Storage Tanks)
City Code Facility IDYear
UST Program (cont’d.)
UST Program (cont’d.)
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
4.0
1.3
3.3 3.2
4.4
3.6
Average Number of UST Violations Per Facility by Year (2008-2013)
Year
Nu
mb
er o
f U
ST
Vio
lati
ons
UST Program (cont’d.)
Los Altos Saratoga Moffett Field
Palo Alto County Area
Los Altos Hills
San Martin Stanford San Jose Morgan Hill
0.0
50.0
100.0
150.0
200.0
250.0
300.0
350.0
11.8 10.8 8.526.0 28.7
2.7 4.0 2.5
310.3
5.2
Average Total Number of UST Violations per year By City Code (2008-2013)
City Code
Nu
mb
er o
f U
ST
Vio
lati
ons
Conclusion
Food Program
• Relevant data• Allows inspectors to
better focus their efforts to specific facilities
• Improve coding of violations• No duplicates• Include “major”
UST Program
• Small data set• Difficult to establish
trends• Possibly positive in
showing that there weren’t a lot of cases
• Improvement within a few years
QUESTIONS?
References
• Staff of Santa Clara County HMCD• Staff of Santa Clara County CPD• Staff of San Diego County DEH• CCDEH