evaluation of spatial repellents under semi-field and field conditions
DESCRIPTION
Evaluation of Spatial Repellents Under Semi-field and Field Conditions. Daniel L. Kline USDA-ARS, CMAVE Gainesville, FL d [email protected]. Spatial (area) repellents. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Evaluation of Spatial Repellents Under Semi-field and Field Conditions
Daniel L. KlineUSDA-ARS, CMAVE
Gainesville, [email protected]
Spatial (area) repellents
Spatial (or area) repellent products are intended to significantly reduce the number of mosquitoes (and potentially other biting flies) in a defined area over a designated period of time.
Military Objectives
•Protect Individual SoldierSentry dutySpecial Operations•Protect Community of SoldiersTentWhole Encampment
Effects On Target Species
•Mortality•True Repellency•Expellency
Commercial Products Tested---2009
o Hot Shot No Pest Strip---2,2- dichlorovinyl dimethyl phosphate 18.6%o SC Johnson’s Clip-On---metofluthrin
31.2%o ThermaCell---d-cis/allethrin 21.97%
Semi-field Tests
4 ft 2 ft
2 ft 4 ft
4 ft8 ft
8 ftMortality Effects
Hot Shot with 2,2-diclorovinyl dimethyl phosphate 18.6% Aedes aegypti
Top position – 3(1’ from the ceiling)
Middle position – 2(3.3’ from the floor)
76-100%
51-75%
26-50%
0-25%
Mortality rate
S N
Bottom position – 1(1’ from the floor)
(Open end)
Hot Shot with 2,2-dichlorovinyl dimethyl phosphate 18.6% Aedes taeniorhynchus
Top position – 3(1’ from the ceiling)
Middle position – 2(3.3’ from the floor)
76-100%
51-75%
26-50%
0-25%
Mortality rate
NS
Bottom position – 1(1’ from the floor)
(Open end)
Hot Shot with 2,2-diclorovinyl dimethylphosphate 18.6% Stomoxys calcitrans
Top position – 3(1’ from the ceiling)
Middle position – 2(3.3’ from the floor)
76-100%
51-75%
26-50%
0-25%
Mortality rate
S N
Bottom position – 1(1’ from the floor)
(Open end)
Off Clip-On with metofluthrin 31.2%Aedes aegypti
Top position – 3(1’ from the ceiling)
Middle position – 2(3.3’ from the floor)
76-100%
51-75%
26-50%
0-25%
Mortality rate
S N
Bottom position – 1(1’ from the floor)
(Open end)
Off Clip-On with metofluthrin 31.2%Aedes taeniorhynchus
Top position – 3(1’ from the ceiling)
Middle position – 2(3.3’ from the floor)
76-100%
51-75%
26-50%
0-25%
Mortality rate
S N
Bottom position – 1(1’ from the floor)
(Open end)
Off Clip-On with metofluthrin 31.2%Stomoxys calcitrans
Top position – 3(1’ from the ceiling)
Middle position – 2(3.3’ from the floor)
76-100%
51-75%
26-50%
0-25%
Mortality rate
S N
Bottom position – 1(1’ from the floor)
(Open end)
ThermaCell with d-cis/allethrin 21.97%Ae. aegypti
Top position – 3(1’ from the ceiling)
Middle position – 2(3.3’ from the floor)
76-100%
51-75%
26-50%
0-25%
Mortality rate
S N
Bottom position – 1(1’ from the floor)
(Open end)
ThermaCell with d-cis/allethrin 21.97%Aedes taeniorhynchus
Top position – 3(1’ from the ceiling)
Middle position – 2(3.3’ from the floor)
76-100%
51-75%
26-50%
0-25%
Mortality rate
S N
Bottom position – 1(1’ from the floor)
(Open end)
ThermaCell with d-cis/allethrin 21.97%Stomoxys calcitrans
Top position – 3(1’ from the ceiling)
Middle position – 2(3.3’ from the floor)
76-100%
51-75%
26-50%
0-25%
Mortality rate
S N
Bottom position – 1(1’ from the floor)
(Open end)
Repellency Effects
Mosquitoes Released Into Each Cage
Ochlerotatus taeniorhynchus (500)Aedes aegypti (500)
Flies Released Into Each Cage
Stomoxys calcitrans (500)
Series10
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
23
0
20
0
55
0
16
40
0
28
18
35
Percent reduction in trap capture using Hot Shot No-Pest Strip, Summer 2009.
Ae. aegypti Ae. taeniorhynchus
Date
Perc
ent r
educ
tion
8/27 9/01 9/04 9/09 9/10 9/15
0102030405060708090
10089
8389 89 87 91
9889
95 9297
86
Percent reduction in trap capture using Off Clip-On repellent, Summer 2009.
Ae. aegypti Ae. taeniorhynchus
Date
Perc
ent r
educ
tion
6/30 7/02 7/07 7/09 7/21 7/23
Series10102030405060708090
100
75
87 82 8375
95
74 76 76
54
85
39
Percent reduction in trap capture using ThermaCell repellent, Summer 2009.
Ae. aegypti Ae. taeniorhynchus
Date
Perc
ent r
educ
tion
7/307/28 8/04 8/06 8/13 8/18
Arkansas Field Studies
Arkansas Field Studies
• 13 trap nights•Five species capturedPsorophora columbiaeAnopheles quadrimaculatusCulex erraticusCulex salinariusAedes vexans
Arkansas Field Studies
•None of the candidate spatial repellents prevented mosquitoes from finding the traps.
•Traps equipped with ThermaCELL captured significantly fewer mosquitoes.
What’s Next: Additional Compounds•Linalool•Geraniol•DEET•TL-I-73 transfluthrin analogue•1% prallethrin•1-Methylpiperazine•1-Ethylpiperazine•1-Methylpyrrolidine•Kamal’s compounds
What’s Next: Delivery Systems
• Attract and Kill Technologies• Spatial repellents and artificial barrier
treatments against Anopheles mosquitoes under field conditions
What’s Next:
Collaborators
•Ulrich Bernier• Jerome Hogsette•Kamal Chauhan• James Dunsford•Todd Walker•David Dame•Max Meisch
Acknowledgements
• Special thanks to Joyce Urban who did all the hard work• Jolene Malicoate for rearing Aedes aegypti•Haze Brown for rearing Aedes taeniorhynchus• Heather Furlong for rearing Stomoxys calcitrans