events and trends in uk higher education, february 2016
TRANSCRIPT
UK Higher Education: Recent Events & Trends
DR EMMA KENNEDY, QMUL
We will cover:
Significant events in government policy on HE• “Brexit”: Britain
leaving the European Union
• The Higher Education and Research Bill
Recent trends within the HE sector• Internationalisation• Increasing diversity on
campus• Changes in university
income
23 June 2016: UK votes OUT of European UnionInstitutions
5% of students from EU: potential fee losses
EU research funds = 11% of Russell Group research income
€2bn from EU Research Council 2014-16: in jeopardy?
Staff Work permits for EU nationals in UK at risk
Reduced funding to apply for
Students 125,000 EU students at British Universities (5% of total enrolment)
Estimated impact on UK economy: £3.7 bn generatedEU membership -> EU students got UK student funding.
What’s happening now?February 2017:
Parliament votes to begin negotiations
to leave EU
British Universities encouraged to
continue to bid for EU research funding
(Horizon 2020: €80bn funding)
EU students guaranteed loans
and grants from UK if they apply in
2017-18
Britain will leave the EU by 2019
Central questions and the futureFunding links with EU
UK Higher Education attracts strong fundingWill EU countries still want to collaborate with UK?Will UK academics be able to apply for EU funding?
Freedom of movement for workersUnder the EU all citizens of member states had free movementHow will the UK negotiate with the rest of the EU?What will this mean for EU citizens working in the UK?
Freedom of movement for studentsStudents will now be classed as ‘international’ -> higher feesWill the UK be less attractive to EU students?Will UK universities be less attractive to other international students?
Professor Simon Gaskell, Principal of QMUL:
“The UK has a very high reputation that has been established over decades and hundreds of years. It will be lost in a matter of months if we get this wrong, designating as universities or giving degree-awarding powers to institutions which are fly-by-night or low-quality. That is the most insidious problem.”
UK Research & Innovation (UKRI)
Higher Education and Research Bill
Office for Fair Access (OFFA)
Office for Students (and TEF)
Discipline-based funding councils (eg Arts &
Humanities Research Council)Higher Education Funding
Council for England (HEFCE)
UK Research & Innovation
Research as a public good
Maintains disciplinary brands of previous research councils
UKRI board will advise the Secretary of State on balance of funding
between research disciplines.
Legislation obliges the Secretary of State to consider the need for both academic and
business representation on the
board of UKRI.
Government is still committed to research decisions being made by researchers not by
politicians
No longer funded by the same council that
funds teaching: separate body
The Office For Students
Market regulator but sits apart
from government
Promote student choice and competition
Collecting data from universities
to give to government
Includes Director of Fair Access
and Participation (replaces OFFA)
Applies regulations and
quality standards
Awards ‘University’ title
and Degree Awarding Powers
Penalises providers who
breach regulations
Runs the Teaching
Excellence Framework
The Teaching Excellence Framework
Institution provides 15 pages additional
info
Drop-out rate
Employment/further study after degree
Student Satisfaction (NSS scores)
Panel grades on 3 outcomes:
1. Teaching Quality2. Learning
Environment3. Student
Outcomes & Learning Gain
Metrics benchmarked
against expectations for
students’ background
Access statement & compliance
GOLD
SILVER
BRONZE
THREE GRADES
Providers given different ratings.
The Teaching Excellence FrameworkYear 1
Submission optional. All providers who meet minimum requirements receive a rating of
“Meets Expectations”.
All these providers can raise fees in line with inflation.
GOLD
SILVER
BRONZE
Year 2 Providers given different ratings but everyone who gets at least a bronze rating can raise fees in line with inflation.
GOLD
SILVER
BRONZE
Year 3
Fees can rise with inflation
Fees can rise with inflation
Fees rise 50% of inflation rate
Possible Consequences of the BillUniversities will focus more on
the metrics that the TEF
measuresWill teacher
training focus on NSS results and
preventing dropout?
One metric is DLHE –> more
focus on careers/further
study?
Will students be penalised for dropping out?
Fees will rise at the ‘best’
universities
Will poorer students miss
out?
Universities that don’t fit the TEF will lose money
More providers will enter the
market – quality risk?
Will the OfS regulate the market as it needs to?
Education is seen as a
competitive market not public good
Seen as an individual
purchase not social good
Students may be viewed or view themselves as
consumers
Research and teaching regulated separately
What about linking research and teaching?
Will there become two separate
paths for academics?
Increasing Internationalisation in UK
UK universities are becoming increasingly international
Non-EU students increased: 9% in 2005–06 to 13.8% in 2014–15
EU students increased : 4.4% in 2005-6 to 5.5% in 2014-15
UK domiciled students decreased by 7% in the same period
(source: Universities UK report: http://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/facts-and-stats/data-and-analysis/Pages/patterns-and-trends-uk-higher-education-2016.aspx )
Increasing class and race diversity
(source: Universities UK report: http://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/facts-and-stats/Pages/higher-education-data.aspx)
In 2016, 19.5% of 18-year-old English-domiciled young people from low participation neighbourhoods entered higher education, compared to 11.2% in 2006.
In 2016, English pupils receiving free school meal were 78% more
likely to go to university than they
were in 2006.
The number of full-time undergraduates
from black and minority ethnic groups rose by 38% between 2007–08 and 2015–
16.
Changes in institutional income
(source: Universities UK report: http://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/facts-and-stats/Pages/higher-education-data.aspx)
2005-6 2014-150%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%University Income
Grants from funding bodies Tuition fees and contracts Research Grants Endowment and Investment Other
Where now? The UK Sector
Loss of EU membership
Will the UK’s international relationships
suffer?
Loss of funding from EU sources
Loss of EU students: focus
on non-EU?
Office for Students
More power to create new HE
institutions
Creating ‘competition’ but also promoting
access
HE as regulated market: providing
more data to government
Teaching Excellence Framework
Increasing focus on important metrics (TEF,
DLHE, dropouts)?
Fees will rise at ‘best’ universities
Change in university rankings?
Internationalisation
More focus on transnational education and regional hubs?
Student support may change as international
students have different needs
UK universities’ needs at odds
with government policy around
student & post-work visas
Increasing Diversity
How to acknowledge
students’ diverse backgrounds?
More support needed around study skills &
transition to HE?
University staff are less diverse than students; is this a problem?
Income more from fees than grants
Students seen as customers not as
pupils
Education as a private good, not
public good?
Where now? QMUL• 44% of students are from overseas• 33% of QMUL staff are from overseas
Our staff and students are international
• 10% of each year of study devoted to employability skills, tailored to student’s interests and ambition
• We need to serve overseas students as well as UK students: their needs for ‘employability’ may be different
• How can we ensure what QMUL Model gives overseas students is useful to them and has international meaning?
QMUL Model
• UK staff development activities centre around Higher Education Academy – HEA has some international credit but not universal
• How to ensure staff development is certified at international level?• Development activities must give skills that can be used in international teaching contexts
Staff Development