HADAR NAFIS GUMAY

KPU Vision and Mission One of KPU Mission is election transparancy

KPU Vision

• Becoming an Independent, Professional and Integrity Election Management Body for Direct, general, free, confidential, honest and fair elections.

KPU Missions

• Building a competent human resources as an effort to create a professional Election Management Body.

• Preparing an election regulations that provides legal certainty, progressive, and participatory.

• Improving elections service quality, especially for stakeholders and generally for the whole community.

• Improving voter’s participation and quality of voter through awareness and sustainable education.

• Strengthening organization’s position in the state administration.

• Improving the integrity of the election organizers to provide intensive and comprehensive understanding, especially regarding election organizers code of conduct.

• Realizing effective and efficient, transparent, accountable and accessable election management body.

Election

Transparancy

Transparency in the

EMB

Transparency in

the Electoral

Stages

Commissioner of EMB Selection Process

Policy Making in the EMB

Election Participant Verification & Candidacy

Campaign Funds

Voters List

Counting and Recapitulation Process

EVOLUTION IN ELECTORAL PROCESS SYSTEM

1955 1971 1977-1982-1987-1992-1997 1999 2004-2009-2014

Revolutian Era

Transitional New Order New Order

For Presidential Election :

1955-1999 : Elected by HR

2004-2014 : Elected by Voters by Two

Round System

Reformation Era

Democration Consolidation

Close List Proportional Representation

National HR, Provincial HR, and

District (Mun/City) HR = open list PR

2004 = Candidate Number Order

2009 = Most Voted

Provincial Representative = SNTV

(single non transferable vote)

Evolution in EMB’s Selection Process

New Order Orde Reformasi

Before 1999 1999 2004 2009 2014

(Government Model) (Mix Model) Independent Model

Election Organized by

Government

EMB’s from

Political Parties

and Independent

Representatives

President Decision

No. 10/2001, state

that KPU

Commissioner

come from

Independent

candidate

Law No. 22/2007,

state that EMB

Commissioner

chosen through

open selection.

Beside KPU, there

is another EMB,

named Bawaslu.

Bawaslu

functioned as an

election

supervisor body.

Law No. 11/2015,

state that EMB

Commissioner chosen

through open

selection.

Beside KPU and

Bawaslu, there is

another EMB named

DKPP. DKPP

functioner as an

ethic council for

election

management body

EMB’s Selection Process Based on Regulation Number 15/2011 on Electoral Management Body

• Parliament forming a selection teams by government (6 month before)

• Series of test: Administration, Written, Track Record, Interview by selection teams.

• Selection teams submit 14 names for KPU and 10 names for Bawaslu to President

• President submit those name to parlement.

• Fit and Proper Test by Parliament select 7 members of KPU and 5 members of Bawaslu by most voted.

• President issuing a President Decision for Members of KPU and Bawaslu selected.

• For Provinicial KPU and Bawaslu also City/Municipal KPU, Selection team and selection process executed by upper level.

Tranparency in EMB Policy Making Process

Drafting KPU

Regulation Internally

KPU conducting Hearing Session with

the subject to the draft of the

regulation with NGO, Mass Media,

Political Parties and Acedemics

KPU revised the regulation based on

the hearing Session, then consult the

draft of the Regulation to the

Parliament

Validating and Socialization to The Regulation

In the policy making process, especially in the regulation making proces, KPU have some steps

considering both the citizen need and fostering the transparency. The steps is as bellow :

KPU ROADMAP OF TRANSPARENCY ON INFORMATION

Application of Law on public information disclosure

Digitalization of Election Data

Implementation of Open Data

(planned to be Implemented in 2018)

In early 2016, KPU initiate to

arrange a roadmap of transparency

on information. This roadmap is an

important stage for making KPU as

an transparent and accountable

electoral management body.

EVOLUTION IN ELECTION STAGES Information Tecnologies has a very important roles to set a transparant election. KPU has making

some evolution in using IT to foster transparency

Election 2014

KPU use IT on every stages of election,

from updating voter list (Sidalih) to the Process of Election

Result Recapitulation (Situng)

Election 2009

- Using IT on the Process of Election Result Recapitulation

- Scan Form C1 (ICR / Intelegency Charecter

reader)

- National Tabulation for presenting the Electoral

Result in the National Level

Election 2004

- Using IT on the Process of Election

Result Recapitulation

- The officer in the district level, input the result on the district

level, send by email to National Level, to be recapitulated in the

national level

Transparancy in Political Parties Verification

Using an Electronic tools called SIPOL (Political Parties Information System)

The process openly watched by Bawaslu, Mass Media, and public

Political Parties can watch the process through system

Transparancy in Candidacy

KPU Published a CV for each candidate in Legislative, Presidential and Local

Election in Website

Candidacy process using SILON (Candidacy Information System)

People can control the process and report if they find any iregularity

Transparancy in Campaign Fund

According the Law, election participant must report their campaign fund before

and after campaign

Campaign fund audited by an independent body and reported openly

KPU Regulate a sanctions for violation in campaign fund

Transparancy in Voters List

Voters list managed by KPU using a SIDALIH (Voters Data Information System)

SIDALIH published in KPU Website

Voters can report to City/Municipal KPU if their name wasn’t in SIDALIH or there

is any changes of address etc.

Transparancy in Counting Process

KPU Publish every counting form from each polling station in Website

People can watch and see the process openly

Counting Process watched by Panwas, Election Participant Witness and Voters

Transparancy in Recapitulation Process

KPU Publish every recapitulation form from each level in Website

People can watch and see the process openly

Counting Process in Open Plenary Meeting watched by Panwas, Election Participant

Witness and Voters

The Usage of ICT on Election Process

• Information System for Voter Registration (SIDALIH), will be discussed and explain in another session

• Information System for Counting (SITUNG), will be discussed and explain in another session

• Information System for Logistics (SILOG)

• Information System for Boundary Delimitation (SIDAPIL)

• Information System for Candidacy (SILON)

SITUNG: Scanning

● C1 Form o A paper where votes written down in a table for every voting both.

Totally over 80 thousands C1 forms.

● Scanning o C1 papers were being scanned in district office, 497 offices total. o The C1 scanned images were uploaded immediately after it scanned. o The scanning and uploading were integrated in one desktop

application that connected to the internet in a secured connection. o The scanners type is Automatic Document Feeder (ADF)

SITUNG: Data Entry

● Data Entry Village Level (Kelurahan) o Based on polling stations result, the recapitulation was written in a paper, established as

an official result in a plenary where attended by witnesses. The result named as C1.

● Data Entry Sub District Level (Kecamatan) o Based on C1, written in a paper, established in a plenary. The result named as DA1. o DA1 was entered in a preformatted spreadsheet, sent to District Office/Portal

● Data Entry District Level (Kabupaten) o Based on DA1, written in a paper, established in a plenary. The result named as DB1. o DB1 was entered in a preformatted spreadsheet and then uploaded to SITUNG Portal

● Data Entry Provincial Level (Provinsi) o Based on DB1, written in a paper, established in a plenary. The result named as DC1. o DC1 was entered in a preformatted spreadsheet and then uploaded to SITUNG Portal

● Data Entry National Level o Based on DC1, written in a paper, established in a plenary. Uploaded to public portal

SITUNG: Verification & Publication

● Verification o DA1, DB1 and DC1 were subject to verification o It will be released to public portal once it verified o Verification conducted by the same officers whose done the data

entry

● Publication o All C1 were published without verification o All DA1, DB1 and DC1 were published with verification

SITUNG- Scan C1 Form

Scanned C1 Form Public Portal

Scanned C1 Form Public Portal

Scanned C1 Form Public Portal

Incorrect C1 scanned

Correct Scanned C1

C1 Example and Infographics

Portal for Recapitulation

TABULATION – ENTRY RESULT

RESULT OF THIS EFFORT

Increasing Public Trust

Minimizing Irregularity

Increasing Confidence on Election