fe planning and funding 2008/09
DESCRIPTION
This is a presentation used as part of a management development programme to introduce the 08/09 LSC Further Education planning and funding mechanism.TRANSCRIPT
1
Planning & Funding
Len TildsleyDIRECTOR OF CURRICULUM & INFORMATION
Len Tildsley • November 2007
2Len Tildsley • November 2007
Planning & Funding
The Planning Context The 08/09 Funding Mechanism Business & Provision Planning
3Len Tildsley • November 2007
Planning & Funding
The Planning Context The 08/09 Funding Mechanism Business & Provision Planning
4Len Tildsley • November 2007
The Planning Context
5Len Tildsley • November 2007
Grant Letter 14-19 Learning Adult Skills Sustainable employment & progression Reforming the system
6Len Tildsley • November 2007
LSC Statement of Priorities National Statement accompanying the
government grant letter “Better Skills, Better Jobs, Better Lives” Covers 08/09 to 10/11 Published 16th November 2007
7Len Tildsley • November 2007
Targets & Priorities Priority 1 : Creating Demand for Skills Priority 2 : Transforming FE Priority 3 : Better Skills, Better Jobs, Better
Lives
8Len Tildsley • November 2007
Creating Demand for Skills
9
…more people to demand more learning because they are clear about the social and economic
benefits that it brings.
Len Tildsley • November 2007
Creating Demand for Skills
10
Young People• 90% of 17 year olds in learning by 2013• 90% of 18 year olds in learning by 2015• 82% of 19 year olds achieving L2 by 2011• 54% of 19 year olds achieving L3 by 2011• NEETs 2% lower by 2010
Len Tildsley • November 2007
Creating Demand for Skills
11
Young People• LSC to work with Connexions and LEA to ensure
that the supply of provision matches demand• The ‘September Guarantee’• Greater flexibility – able to start in January• More Apprenticeship places - matching• National entitlement to diploma places• Clear L1 and pre-vocational offer• Clear progression routes to HE and employment
Len Tildsley • November 2007
Creating Demand for Skills
12
Adults• Bias funding towards those without skills and
qualifications• Link funding to ‘skills accounts’• Adult careers service• Personal learning – time and location• Increased full-cost work• Open College buildings for community use
Len Tildsley • November 2007
Creating Demand for Skills
13
Employers• Use ESF funding to extend TtG service• Numeracy, Literacy and ESOL available as stand-alone
options through TtG• Adult Apprenticeships merged with TtG• Part-funded 2nd L3 pilot through TtG• Full-funded 2nd L2 to retrain unemployed• Progress towards funding only SQS qualifications• Fund more employers to provide their own
apprenticeship programmes
Len Tildsley • November 2007
Targets & Priorities Priority 1 : Creating Demand for Skills Priority 2 : Transforming FE Priority 3 : Better Skills, Better Jobs, Better
Lives
14Len Tildsley • November 2007
Transforming FE Align fees policies across all publicly funded
provision Increase income through fees and full-cost work Focus on income targets Fully integrate ESF funding Fairer funding methodology Establish Framework for Excellence Develop The Qualifications & Credit Framework
15Len Tildsley • November 2007
Transforming FE £2.3bn of capital investment Allow non-FE providers to bid for LSC capital funding Embed and Extend ILT Drive CPD Work with leading colleges to ‘blueprint’ future
business models Increase the number of national skills academies Increased commissioning and tendering to fill skills gaps
16Len Tildsley • November 2007
Targets & Priorities Priority 1 : Creating Demand for Skills Priority 2 : Transforming FE Priority 3 : Better Skills, Better Jobs, Better
Lives
17Len Tildsley • November 2007
Better Skills, Better Jobs, Better Lives
18Len Tildsley • November 2007
“We want to increase the sector’s focus on integrating skills with employment so that more
people get the training and qualifications they need to come off benefits, enter work and progress -
more of the learning we fund to result in job outcomes.”
Better Skills, Better Jobs, Better Lives
Protect opportunities for students with learning difficulties and/or disabilities
Protect funding for PCDL and neighbourhood learning in deprived communities
Protect funding for ESOL and learning below L2 that forms the FLT.
19Len Tildsley • November 2007
Better Skills, Better Jobs, Better Lives
Focus funding on FLT, Skills for Life and Level 2
People and communities most excluded from the labour market and those in ‘vulnerable’ employment
Numeracy skills Offender learning
20Len Tildsley • November 2007
Better Skills, Better Jobs, Better Lives
All young people to take part in work experience
Employers encouraged to recruit untrained or low-skilled staff to access supported training (inc. Pre-employment) through TtG.
Employability skills programmes for the unemployed
Higher skills programmes in conjunction with HEFCE
21Len Tildsley • November 2007
Becoming Demand Led Common funding mechanism for all 16-19
year olds Common approach to funding ‘New Diplomas’
for all 14-19 year olds All vocational skill funding to move towards
skills accounts and Train2Gain• £500m in skills accounts by 2011• £1.5bn in skills accounts by 2015
50:50 balance between funding and fees
22Len Tildsley • November 2007
Demand Led – First Steps More sophisticated commissioning of
provision – focussed on social inclusion New funding models – learner and
employer choice Qualification reform Increase MLP acceptable rates FE self regulation by 2012
23Len Tildsley • November 2007
Demand Led Funds
24Len Tildsley • November 2007
Commissioning 1 Sector Skills Council priority qualifications 14-19
• Partnerships• Colleges• Schools• WBL Providers
LEA to run ‘competitions’ to fulfil perceived gaps in provision > 200 places
25Len Tildsley • November 2007
Commissioning 2 Adult Learners
• LLDD, PCDL, FLT, S4L• Full Level 2, Full Level 3• Whole qualifications at Level 4
Negotiated volumes with existing providers Further negotiation or tendering to fill gaps
26Len Tildsley • November 2007
Commissioning 3 Provision for employers
• Accelerate the expansion of TtG• Reward excellence• New providers linked to employer choice• New providers from competitive tendering• Multi-year contracts• Contract values varied in-year
27Len Tildsley • November 2007
Qualification Reform 1 Qualifications ‘fit for purpose’ Smaller ‘chunks’ Sector qualification strategies (End of Nov) Funding discontinued for a large number of
qualifications – progressive Employer and Provider developed training
eligible for full QCF approval by 2010
28Len Tildsley • November 2007
Qualification Reform 2 Foundation Learning Tier (FLT)
• Intended to improve progression to L2• Enhance ‘employability’• Majority of sub L2 provision will be units and
qualifications in FLT• Will replace E2E and LLDD provision
29Len Tildsley • November 2007
Raising and Assuring Quality Eliminate inadequate provision in FE Minimum levels of performance
• More areas of provision• Increased rates for 08/09
TtG Providers expected to move towards success rates >80%
30Len Tildsley • November 2007
Minimum Levels of Performance
31Len Tildsley • November 2007
Self Regulation A new relationship between the LSC and the FE
system LSC to discuss, in detail, what we offer How we respond to learner, employer and
community needs Support the integration of employment and skills Demand Led funding = financial planning challenge Transitional arrangements and support
32Len Tildsley • November 2007
Funding Allocations 1 16-18
• New funding system• Average rate increase of 2.1%• No funding for transferred qualifications• Keys skills removed from entitlement funding• Reduce funding for L3 learning• 40,000 ‘new diploma’ places funded by LSC
33Len Tildsley • November 2007
Funding Allocations 2 Adult Learners
• Funding targeted – those excluded from the labour market
• Total number of funded learners expected to reduce• Longer or more substantial programmes• In-year and end-year reconciliation• No viament to other categories• Average funding rate increase of 1.5%• At least 15% to deliver Full L2• At least 10% to deliver Full L3
34Len Tildsley • November 2007
Funding Allocations 3 Employer Driven
• Rapid expansion of TtG• >£160m of adult FE funding moved to TtG• Scope to include L3 and Higher Skills• S4L to be available independantly• 20,000 more aged 19-25 apprentices• £30m for aged 25+ apprentices
35Len Tildsley • November 2007
Exercise 1
36Len Tildsley • November 2007
In your table groups compare the college today with the college we need to become if we are to respond to the priorities and changes outlined
for the sector over the next three years.
Agree your top THREE priority changes and text them along with your name to...
07703 ??????One text per table !
37Len Tildsley • November 2007
Planning & Funding
The Planning Context The 08/09 Funding Mechanism Business & Provision Planning
38Len Tildsley • November 2007
Funding Systems
39Len Tildsley • November 2007
School 6th Forms
E2E
Further Education
Apprenticeships
Train to Gain
16 to 18
Adult
LearnerResponsiv
e
16 to 18
Adult
Employer
Responsive
Funding aligned but with transitional protection
Variance capped at +/- 2.1% from 07/08• Funding at the Learner Level only
Funded by DCSF Move from LSC to LEA in 2011
40Len Tildsley • November 2007
School 6th Forms
E2E
Further Education
16 to 18Learner
Responsive
PSA targets and prioritisation Variance capped at +/- 2.1% from 07/08
• Funding at the Learner Level only Mid-year and end-year reconciliation with tolerance and
cap Different rates for fee paying students (42.5% in 08/09) Funded by DIUS Fully funded through skills accounts by 2015
41Len Tildsley • November 2007
Further Education
AdultLearner
Responsive
Monthly payments in arrears on 10th working day of the following month
25% of funding paid on achievement Planned alongside FE provision Funded by DCSF
42Len Tildsley • November 2007
Apprenticeships 16 to 18Em
ployerResponsiv
e
Targets and priorities critical Monthly payments in arrears on 10th working
day of the following month 25% of funding paid on achievement Part Time adult NVQs included Funded by DIUS
43Len Tildsley • November 2007
Further Education
Apprenticeships
Train to GainAdult
Employer
Responsive
Demand Led Funding Taken 2 ½ years to develop Single mechanism – use wholly or partly Standard Learner Numbers (SLN) National funding Rate per SLN Modified by the Provider Factor New census points New calculation to determine ALS
44Len Tildsley • November 2007
Standard Learner Numbers 1 Similar to FTEs Use GLH to Calculate GLH determined by Awarding Body / QCA /
LSC and published in LAD Some qualification have ‘variable’ GLH 16-18 entitlement = 114 GLH Capped at 1.75
45Len Tildsley • November 2007
Standard Learner Numbers 2
SLN = Total Annual GLH
450
46Len Tildsley • November 2007
National Funding Rate One rate for each category Co-funded rate for those paying fees (-42.5%)
• 16-18 Learner Responsive• Adult Learner Responsive• Co-Funded Adult Learner Responsive• 16-18 Employer Responsive• Adult Employer Responsive• Co-funded Adult Employer Responsive
47Len Tildsley • November 2007
Co-Funded Rate
co-funded rate = full rate – fee element
Fee element similar to current system Fee element varies with provider factor but is
not the same as the fee to the learner
Fee element = full rate x Fee rate
provider factor
48Len Tildsley • November 2007
Provider Factor Replaces
• Programme Weighting• Disadvantage uplift• Area costs• Funding amount variation on withdrawal (by using
the overall GLH weighted success rate)
ONE factor for the whole college each year No variation by team or subject
49Len Tildsley • November 2007
Provider Factor 2
50Len Tildsley • November 2007
Learner GLH PWF Disadvantage
Short Programme
Modifier Area Cost
Provider Success
RateSuccess Factor
Provider Factor
A 200 1.3 1.040 1.033 1.03 74% 0.87B 500 1.0 1.025 1.000 1.03 74% 0.87
Weighted Average 1.086 1.029 1.010 1.03 0.87 1.011
Based on prior year history for learner responsive
Based on actual aims delivered for employer responsive
Funding Calculation 1 For each category of learner
Provider funding rate
=
national funding rate x provider factor
51Len Tildsley • November 2007
Funding Calculation 2 For each learner
££££
=
provider funding rate x SLN
52Len Tildsley • November 2007
Example 1
53Len Tildsley • November 2007
Qualification Actual GLH LSC GLH SLNEDEXCEL Diploma 380 450NCFE Additional Cert 100 120Entitlement 48 114Key Skill 48 48TOTAL 576 732 1.63
National Funding Rate (16-18 LR)• £2,775 (confirmed)
Provider Factor • 1.0275
Example 2
54Len Tildsley • November 2007
National Funding Rate (Adult LR) ??? Funding =
Qualification Actual GLH LSC GLH SLNCity & Guilds Certificate 119 140 0.31
Provider Factor 1.1228National Rate per SLN 2,345.00Fee per SLN 996.63Provider Rate per SLN 2,632.97Fee Element 887.62Cofunded Rate 1,457.38
Starts and Census Dates Old census dates will no longer apply ‘Starts’ are
• >24 weeks - counted after 6 weeks• 2-24 weeks – counted after 2 weeks• <2 weeks – must attend once
Full funding eligible after this date No funding if the student withdraws before Starts counted in each year for multi-year
programmes55Len Tildsley • November 2007
Exercise 2
56Len Tildsley • November 2007
Qualification Actual GLH LSC GLH SLN Qualification Actual GLH LSC GLH SLNVTCT NVQ 3 456 450 C&G Diploma 136 220VTCT Certificate 68 100 C&G Numeracy 68 68C&G NVQ 2 34 200 Health & Saftety 17 10Health & Saftety 17 10 TOTALKey Skill 48 48Entitlement 48 114 PWF 1.095TOTAL Disadvantage 1.062
Short Pr Mod 1.007Area Cost 1.000Success 77%
National Rate per SLN £2,775 Provider FactorProvider Factor 1.011 National Rate per SLN £2,345
Fee Per SLNFUNDING Provider Rate per SLN
Fee ElementCofunded Rate
FUNDING
Weighted Average
Adult Learner Responsive Student16 to 18 Full-Time Student
Exercise 2 Answer
57Len Tildsley • November 2007
Qualification Actual GLH LSC GLH SLN Qualification Actual GLH LSC GLH SLNVTCT NVQ 3 456 450 C&G Diploma 136 220VTCT Certificate 68 100 C&G Numeracy 68 68C&G NVQ 2 34 200 Health & Saftety 17 10Health & Saftety 17 10 TOTAL 298 0.66Key Skill 48 48Entitlement 48 114 PWF 1.095TOTAL 922 2.05 Disadvantage 1.062
1.75 Short Pr Mod 1.007Area Cost 1.000Success 77%
National Rate per SLN £2,775 Provider Factor 1.036Provider Factor 1.011 National Rate per SLN £2,345
Fee Per SLN £997FUNDING £4,909.67 Provider Rate per SLN £2,430
Fee Element £962Cofunded Rate £1,383
FUNDING £949.39
Weighted Average
Adult Learner Responsive Student16 to 18 Full-Time Student
Planning & Funding
The Planning Context The 08/09 Funding Mechanism Business & Provision Planning
58Len Tildsley • November 2007
Planning Process
59Len Tildsley • November 2007
Planning Software
60Len Tildsley • November 2007
Business Plan Updated for 08/09 Coordinated by schools Planned at Programme Team level Designed to address priorities May be reviewed by LSC for the 1st time Tries to avoid SAR/QUIP overlap
61Len Tildsley • November 2007
Structure Directed Actions Demand Addressing Priorities Learning Pathways Provision Changes Strategic Themes Agreed Targets Revenue Plan Capital Bids
62Len Tildsley • November 2007
Directed Actions Specific changes requested by senior
management How they will be fulfilled Who will be responsible Improving efficiency
63Len Tildsley • November 2007
Demand Market analysis Historical trends Successes and Failures Competition Opportunities Marketing
64Len Tildsley • November 2007
Addressing Priorities Young People 14-19 Work Placements Adult Skills
• Skills for Life• Full Level 2 and 3• Higher Skills
Employment skills Income Generation
65Len Tildsley • November 2007
Learning Pathways Progression Routes & Entry Criteria
• Full Time• Part Time
Employment• Job Skills• Apprenticeship
66Len Tildsley • November 2007
Provision Changes New Provision Changed Provision Discontinued Provision
67Len Tildsley • November 2007
Strategic Themes Employer Engagement VLE (Moodle) Implementation ILT in the classroom Curriculum Learning Centres Functional Skills & Embedding eILP Every Child Matters
68Len Tildsley • November 2007
Agreed Targets Learner Numbers SLNs Retention Achievement Attendance Budget Surplus
69Len Tildsley • November 2007
Revenue Plan Expenditure
• Staffing• Agency• Non Pay
Income• Funding Allocations• Fees
70Len Tildsley • November 2007
Capital Bids Link to business plan Justification Impact if not agreed
71Len Tildsley • November 2007
72Len Tildsley • November 2007