federal environment agency ilter ground truthing visions... ilter lter europe conference donana,...

18
Federal Environment Agency ILTER Ground truthing visions... ILTER LTER Europe Conference Donana, 22.-24 January 2008 Michael Mirtl Fed. Environment Agency, Austria RESULTS OF THE second European LTER Scientific Site Coordinators (SSC) WORKshop

Upload: arlene-anslow

Post on 02-Apr-2015

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Federal Environment Agency ILTER Ground truthing visions... ILTER LTER Europe Conference Donana, 22.-24 January 2008 Michael Mirtl Fed. Environment Agency,

Federal Environment Agency

ILTER

Ground truthing visions...

ILTER

LTER Europe Conference

Donana, 22.-24 January 2008

Michael MirtlFed. Environment Agency, Austria

RESULTS OF THE second European LTER Scientific Site Coordinators (SSC)

WORKshop

Page 2: Federal Environment Agency ILTER Ground truthing visions... ILTER LTER Europe Conference Donana, 22.-24 January 2008 Michael Mirtl Fed. Environment Agency,

Federal Environment Agency

ILTER Session on standard observations and

parameters

Page 3: Federal Environment Agency ILTER Ground truthing visions... ILTER LTER Europe Conference Donana, 22.-24 January 2008 Michael Mirtl Fed. Environment Agency,

Federal Environment Agency

ILTER

Method 1

Each expert selected parameters he/she would list if asked for Parameters most used by himself and others Parameters that should be measured most urgentlyThe precondition was to think only of parameters, which in principle covered the parameter groups as proposed at the

NNRC 21.1.2008 referred to the site level1-2 parameters should be listed belonging to the following groups,

respectively: Structural parameter Functional parameter Pressure parameter (either abiotic or biotic)

Page 4: Federal Environment Agency ILTER Ground truthing visions... ILTER LTER Europe Conference Donana, 22.-24 January 2008 Michael Mirtl Fed. Environment Agency,

Federal Environment Agency

ILTER

Method 2

The „most used“ parameter were written on blue cards

The „most desireable“ parameters were written on white cards

On the floor of the conference room the following two axes were marked on the floor: Availability: current availability for data on this parameter Feasability: technical and implementation feasability

The participants then put their parameters in the right position (sectors) of this 2-dimensional graph on the floor

Page 5: Federal Environment Agency ILTER Ground truthing visions... ILTER LTER Europe Conference Donana, 22.-24 January 2008 Michael Mirtl Fed. Environment Agency,

Federal Environment Agency

ILTER

Method 3

low

FEASABILITY low

AVAILABILITY high

high

Page 6: Federal Environment Agency ILTER Ground truthing visions... ILTER LTER Europe Conference Donana, 22.-24 January 2008 Michael Mirtl Fed. Environment Agency,

Federal Environment Agency

ILTER

Method 3

The cards were thematically grouped within each sectors, counted and removed

A few cards reamained as, mostly project-specific „noise“, on the floor and finally removed (indication of sector again)

The result are parameter groups in each sector, representing the judgement of the present experts alongside the categories „available“ high/low and „feasable“ high/low

Page 7: Federal Environment Agency ILTER Ground truthing visions... ILTER LTER Europe Conference Donana, 22.-24 January 2008 Michael Mirtl Fed. Environment Agency,

Federal Environment Agency

ILTER

Brainstorming and categorizing

sector parameter counts

1 atmospheric depositon (total) 6

1 land cover pattern 61 land use 6

1 ozone 41 alien species 31 community (structure) 31 light availability 11 soil properties and quality 12 plant species composition 202 basic meteorology 172 soil chemistry and condition 142 biomass/ NPP 122 vegetation structure 112 atmospheric deposition 9

Page 8: Federal Environment Agency ILTER Ground truthing visions... ILTER LTER Europe Conference Donana, 22.-24 January 2008 Michael Mirtl Fed. Environment Agency,

Federal Environment Agency

ILTER

4 sections divided by availability and feasability axis, score>8 marked yellow

low

FEASABILITY low

AVAILABILITY high

high

Page 9: Federal Environment Agency ILTER Ground truthing visions... ILTER LTER Europe Conference Donana, 22.-24 January 2008 Michael Mirtl Fed. Environment Agency,

Federal Environment Agency

ILTER

Merging evidently overlapping/identical groups („PLUS“)

FEASABILITY low

AVAILABILITY high

high

low

Page 10: Federal Environment Agency ILTER Ground truthing visions... ILTER LTER Europe Conference Donana, 22.-24 January 2008 Michael Mirtl Fed. Environment Agency,

Federal Environment Agency

ILTER

Multiple listings in different sectors represent different parameters of the group and differences in subjective

judgment

low

FEASABILITY low

AVAILABILITY high

high

Page 11: Federal Environment Agency ILTER Ground truthing visions... ILTER LTER Europe Conference Donana, 22.-24 January 2008 Michael Mirtl Fed. Environment Agency,

Federal Environment Agency

ILTER

Multiple listings: one more...

low

FEASABILITY low

AVAILABILITY high

high

Page 12: Federal Environment Agency ILTER Ground truthing visions... ILTER LTER Europe Conference Donana, 22.-24 January 2008 Michael Mirtl Fed. Environment Agency,

Federal Environment Agency

ILTER

Multiple listings in different sectors all indicated by matching colours in the „counts“ column

low

FEASABILITY low

AVAILABILITY high

high

Page 13: Federal Environment Agency ILTER Ground truthing visions... ILTER LTER Europe Conference Donana, 22.-24 January 2008 Michael Mirtl Fed. Environment Agency,

Federal Environment Agency

ILTER

Preliminary conclusions from session on standard observations/parameters

A few groups of parameters are obviously important, available and feasable, so they could be recommended immediately (partially down to the parameter level)

These underpin the applicability of the list proposed by the Standard Observations group (Petriccione et al.), now underpinned by a set of concrete parameters

The interaction between long-term ecosystem monitoring (LTEM) and LTER needs to be scrutinized in more detail

It might be, that the discussion about standard parameters results in a recommendation related to the selection of further LTER sites in the sense, that they shall be located in close proximity to or even overlap with sites of existing monitoring (LTEM) schemes.

Page 14: Federal Environment Agency ILTER Ground truthing visions... ILTER LTER Europe Conference Donana, 22.-24 January 2008 Michael Mirtl Fed. Environment Agency,

Federal Environment Agency

ILTER

Preliminary conclusions from session on standard observations/parameters

The SSCC is not ready to decide on standards on the parameter level (beyond item 1)

The SSCC will continue working on the issue throughout the week

The SSCC will how the outcome needs to be communicated outside LTER-Europe and to the LTER-Europe community

The aquatic group needs input from more experts

Page 15: Federal Environment Agency ILTER Ground truthing visions... ILTER LTER Europe Conference Donana, 22.-24 January 2008 Michael Mirtl Fed. Environment Agency,

Federal Environment Agency

ILTER

Work plan for Thursday and Friday

9:30 - Introduction Overview of progress Revision of agenda Self-presentation of participants attending the first time

10:15 - Results of WG on SSCC structuring and services (incl. discussion)

11:00 - Break11:15 - Results of WG on standard parameters (incl. discussion)12:00 – Interface with networks and programmes related to LTER

(-> „LTEM“): completion of list & key contacts12:15 – Parallel WGs: LTSER, Information Management or one

alternative 13:30 – Lunch15:00 – Report of WGs (LTSER, ?information management)16:00 – Programme of Work, Division of tasks, Time plan17:00 – Decision on required WGs and planning teams on Friday18:00 – Closing of the meeting

Page 16: Federal Environment Agency ILTER Ground truthing visions... ILTER LTER Europe Conference Donana, 22.-24 January 2008 Michael Mirtl Fed. Environment Agency,

Federal Environment Agency

ILTER

The environment of developing SSCC further

Scientific Site Co-ordinatorConference (SSCC)

National Networks Representatives Conference

(NNRC)

Co-ordinating Committee

(CC)

EC

Structure? Governance?

Page 17: Federal Environment Agency ILTER Ground truthing visions... ILTER LTER Europe Conference Donana, 22.-24 January 2008 Michael Mirtl Fed. Environment Agency,

Federal Environment Agency

ILTER

Proposed structure for SSCC

LTER – site LTER manager (numbers refer to the number of cards which mentioned this skill)

Data management - 12 Structure builder - 9 Recognised scientist - 9 Communication monster - 7 Secure position - 6 Networked - 5 Locally oriented – 4

LTSER- platform manager Scientific generalist - 16 Manager in power - 12 Well informed i.e. connected/networked - 9 Experienced in data management - 6 Communicative - 5

Page 18: Federal Environment Agency ILTER Ground truthing visions... ILTER LTER Europe Conference Donana, 22.-24 January 2008 Michael Mirtl Fed. Environment Agency,

Federal Environment Agency

ILTER

Proposed structure for SSCC

LTER – site LTER manager (numbers refer to the number of cards which mentioned this skill)

Data management - 12 Structure builder - 9 Recognised scientist - 9 Communication monster - 7 Secure position - 6 Networked - 5 Locally oriented – 4

LTSER- platform manager Scientific generalist - 16 Manager in power - 12 Well informed i.e. connected/networked - 9 Experienced in data management - 6 Communicative - 5

Structure of SSC Conferences

Ple

nary

Ple

nary

Ple

nary

Ple

nary

? S

cie

nti

fic

LTER

Con

f.

NN

RC

CC

Networking in the WEB (Fora, Contacts)

Networking at meetings-- Participants profiles according to Infobase, LTER contact database, registration information-- New information in Infobase: Fotos of site co-ordinators, site presentations

Res.AgendaCommunic

Harmonisat LTSER

Technology Info Manag

Site-Manag

LTER-Europe Expert panels

(including ALTER WPs and other expert groups)