ferroresonance in power systems

Upload: flyman

Post on 01-Jun-2018

240 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/9/2019 Ferroresonance in Power Systems

    1/9

  • 8/9/2019 Ferroresonance in Power Systems

    2/9

    closed-form solution is then used to draw contour maps

    of the system, showing the safe and ferroresonant regions

    as a function of the circuits parameters.

    To verify the validity of the analytical results, the

    circuit was solved numerically with a Runge-Kutta inte-

    gration routine. Excellent agreement was found between

    the analytically-predicted steady-state values and the

    numerical solution.

    An important observation derived from this study is

    the effect of the losses in determining the value of CcririCol

    (proportional to the feeders length) beyond which ferro-

    resonance can

    occur.

    The methods of analysis presented are being extended

    for the analytical prediction of harmonics and sub-

    harmonics in steady state solutions and for the character-

    isation of jump and chaotic phenomena in certain regions

    of the parametric maps.

    2 Problem description

    The operation of a power transformer under ferro-

    resonance can be illustrated with the diagrams of Fig. 2,

    which show the relationship between the fundamental

    frequency components of voltages and currents in the

    circuit of Fig.

    1

    ignoring the

    losses R

    for simplicity. In the

    development of the general case,

    losses

    are shown to be

    an important consideration in the determination of the

    critical feeder length. Upper case letters are used to indi-

    cate fundamental frequency phasor quantities.

    In

    Fig. 2a, the intersection of the straight-line E,

    V

    (representing the voltage applied to the transformer coil)

    with the transformers magnetisation characteristic is

    possible at three points: points A and C are stable oper-

    ating points. Point

    B

    is unstable. The instability of point

    B can be seen, for instance, by increasing the source

    voltage by a small amount. In Fig. 2a, increasing E, dis-

    places the line

    E, V

    upwards, parallel to itself. When

    this happens, the current at intersection points

    A

    and C

    also increases, as expected. For point 8 the current

    decreases, which is not physically possible. Point

    A

    corre-

    sponds to normal operation in the linear region, with flux

    and excitation current within the design limits. Point C

    corresponds to the ferroresonant condition, characterised

    by saturated flux and large excitation current. Phasor

    diagrams for these operating conditions are shown in Fig.

    2b.

    Mathematically, both points A and C are equally valid

    solutions to the circuit of Fig.

    1.

    Which operating point

    0.4

    I . . . . .

    0.01

    0.2 0.4

    0 6

    a8 1.0

    L

    the system settles at depends on he initial conditions and

    on the trajectory towards the final state. During normal

    service, the transformer is supplied through inductive

    lines and operation is only possible in the lower flux

    region (line

    E, V

    in Fig.

    2a

    becomes E,

    -

    AVfedrr

    with

    a negative slope). Topological abnormalities in the

    network, as for example, the disconnection of one

    or

    more of the supply conductors, can result in the trans-

    former being fed through the coupling capacitance from

    adjacent lines

    or

    conductors. When these topological

    changes occur, whether the operating point stays

    in

    the

    linear region

    or

    jumps into the saturated region is a

    random event which depends on the specific character-

    istics of the transient.

    3 Transformer modelling

    Fig. 3shows the magnetisation curves of the

    25

    MVA,

    110kV power autotransformer of Reference

    1

    for differ-

    ent ranges of magnetising current. During ferroresonance,

    the operating point of the transformer is located in the

    saturated region. An accurate description of the condi-

    tions of operation in this region involves the flux and

    current ranges shown in Fig. 3c. At this scale, for the core

    materials used in modern high-voltage power trans-

    formers, hysteresis loops are not significant and a single-

    valued curve can be assumed.

    For the analytical description of the circuit in Fig. 1,

    it is convenient to fit the

    4(i)

    characteristic of the

    transformer by a polynomial. The notation

    4

    is used to

    indicate total

    flux

    linkages. A good fit of the Hi) charac-

    teristic at the scale Fig.

    3c

    can be accomplished by the

    following two-term polynomial

    (1)

    = a+ + b4

    The first term in eqn.

    1

    corresponds to the linear region

    of the magnetisation curve. The higher-order term

    approximates the saturation region. There is a strong

    decoupling between the linear and nonlinear terms of

    eqn. 1 because of the high order of the second term. The

    coefficient

    a

    of the linear term corresponds closely to the

    unsaturated magnetising inductance (a

    = l/L).

    Coefficient

    b and the exponent of the nonlinear term are chosen to

    provide a best fit of the saturation region.

    Fig. 4shows the detail of the saturation region for dif-

    ferent exponents of the nonlinear term in eqn.

    1.

    As can

    be seen in the Figure, polynomials of order seven

    or

    less

    0.4

    t y.p.u.

    0

    Fig. 3 Magnetisation characteristic of power transformer

    322

    IEE PROCEEDINGS-C, Vol.138,N o .

    4 ,

    J U L Y

    1991

    Authorized licensed use limited to: Universidad de chile. Downloaded on December 1, 2008 at 01:43 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.

  • 8/9/2019 Ferroresonance in Power Systems

    3/9

  • 8/9/2019 Ferroresonance in Power Systems

    4/9

    Ignoring the harmonics the term +w:a {. } in eqn.

    klw:Wsin(w,t+O)

    10can be expressed (with eqn.

    7)

    as

    = k,w$V - ' [ ( @os 0)sin w,

    +

    (asin 0)cos w,

    ]

    =

    klw: V -l(aXinos +ay os w, )

    Substituting into eqn.

    10,

    the resulting equation can be

    separated into sine and cosine terms and the following

    relationships can be established:

    (1

    1)

    0

    [ - of

    -

    W@

    +

    k1~:W -']@,

    -

    Qr

    =

    0

    RC

    [ - of

    - w@ +

    k,w: @ -']ay5 ax

    =

    w,

    (12)

    with

    az= @ + a;

    Eqns.

    11-13

    determine the values ofmX and a,, and thus

    the solution 4(t) or the transformer flux eqns.5-7) in a

    Ritz sense. A similar procedure can be. used to determine

    the harmonics and subharmonics of the general solution.

    6 Parametric maps of fund amental solu tion

    In what follows, eqns.

    11-13,

    which define the fundamen-

    tal component of the transformer flux in the circuit of

    Fig. 1, are manipulated into a more convenient form for

    the graphical location of the solution points. The effects

    of the circuit parameters, e,, C and

    R,

    in the location of

    the borders separating the normal and ferroresonant

    regions are investigated.

    Eqns.

    11

    and 12 can be combined by squaring and

    adding. After some algebraic manipulations (Appendix),

    the following single relationship is obtained:

    where

    +

    P l t -

    o =

    0

    (14)

    z

    p + l ) / Z

    c

    = az

    (15)

    Eqn.

    14

    can be solved numerically using a root-finding

    routine for polynomials. Once the roots t are found, the

    amplitude of the transformer flux

    fit)

    in eqn.

    5

    is given

    by

    =

    +Jt. The phase angle

    8

    is given by 0 =

    tan-'(@,&.), where ax nd ay re obtained from eqns.

    11 and

    12

    as follows:

    in which

    A =(wf - wt)

    +

    k,w:W -'

    B = O

    RC

    Depending on the particular set of circuit parameters,

    convergence of a numerical procedure to solve eqn. 14

    can be difficult if the initial estimates of the roots are not

    close enough to the solution. A single-point numerical

    solution does not give any information on he position of

    this solution with respect to the overall boundaries

    between normal and ferroresonant regions.

    A

    much better visualisation

    of

    the margins of safety for

    a given solution point can be obtained with graphical

    mappings of parametric solutions.

    One possible pro-

    cedure is to express eqn. 14 as the intersection of a linear

    function

    I

    with a nonlinear function

    I

    as follows:

    1,

    = P l c - o

    I2 = p 2 p )/2

    (21)

    (22)

    A plot showing a given I curve with several cases of I

    curves is shown in Fig.

    5.

    For curve I l there are three

    Fig. 5

    Graphical solution of circuit

    o =

    Jc;

    solutions points, A, B and

    C.

    Solutions

    A

    and

    C

    are

    stable. Solution B is unstable (a small disturbance at

    B

    would shift the operating point to either A or

    C).

    Solu-

    tion

    C

    is the ferroresonant state. Solution

    A

    is the normal

    linear state. Curve

    2

    of

    I

    corresponds to the critical case

    beyond which ferroresonance is no longer possible.

    Ferroresonance is not possible for curve 3.

    The effect of the parameters

    e,, C

    and R in the circuit

    of Fig. 1on the possible regions of operation of the

    system is investigated with the help of graphical solu-

    tions.

    7

    Of the coefficients

    p o ,

    p1

    and p 2 defining the

    1,

    and

    dz

    functions of Fig.

    5 ,

    only the slope

    p1

    of I depends

    on

    he

    shunt

    losses

    (eqns.

    21

    and

    22

    with eqns.

    16-18).

    Fig.

    6

    illustrates the effect of the shunt losses in terms of

    G =

    1/R

    on the location of the solution points. Fig.

    6a

    corresponds to Fig. 5 . The plots in Fig.

    6

    correspond to

    the actual parameters of the test system studied with

    E

    =

    1.0pa. Increasing the losses (increasing

    G)

    will

    increase the

    slope

    of

    I

    and beyond a certain value of p1

    the intersection of

    I

    and I, will occur only outside the

    ferroresonant region.

    Figs.

    6b

    and

    c

    show a general case of possible varia-

    tion of transformer flux with shunt conductance G. In

    Fig. 6b, the values G, and G , of shunt conductance

    delimit the possible regions of operation of the circuit.

    For G < Gl (region 111 in the Figure), operation is only

    possible in the ferroresonant region. For G, < G

    Gz

    region

    I),

    ferroresonance cannot occur. Fig.

    6c

    shows the special case in which the numerical solution

    Critical values of shu nt

    losses

    IEE PROCEEDINGS-C, Vol. 138, N o . 4, J U L Y 1991

    24

    Authorized licensed use limited to: Universidad de chile. Downloaded on December 1, 2008 at 01:43 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.

  • 8/9/2019 Ferroresonance in Power Systems

    5/9

    for G , is less than zero and, therefore, only regions I and

    I1

    exist.

    6 r

    G-12 mS

    51 / / G = l O m S

    - 2 y

    0.0

    0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5

    5

    4

    3

    2

    0

    -2

    0.0

    0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5

    5

    0

    I

    G I G2 62

    G G

    b

    C

    Fig.

    6

    a

    Teal

    system E =

    1.0

    p.u.

    b

    General

    cax

    e

    Gemral case

    Effect of losses on circuit solution

    The critical values G , and G , in Fig. 6b can be found

    From eqn.

    14,

    solving for GZ

    by taking dG/dr

    =

    0 in eqn. 14 (G = l/R).

    Taking

    dG/dr = 0

    gives

    - y](n

    +

    - U: - 03

    (n

    -

    )

  • 8/9/2019 Ferroresonance in Power Systems

    6/9

    some algebra

    a:[

    -

    E2)C2

    (a[

    + klb[( +')'Z)C

    1 2

    N r Y

    (28)

    For a given value of

    [

    (or of the transformer flux

    4 = +,/

  • 8/9/2019 Ferroresonance in Power Systems

    7/9

    V, =

    KO,,,

    The transformer core losses are taken as 1

    of the rated transformer capacity. With these values, the

    parameters in the reduced equivalent circuit of Fig.

    10

    are C

    =

    777 nF, E

    =

    O.15Km,, and

    R

    = 48.4 kR

    1.0-

    0 8

    0 6

    0.4

    Fig. 10 Reduced equivalent circuit

    E = 0.5 v

    c, +

    2c.

    c =

    c,

    + ZC,

    10.1Magnetisation curve

    The magnetisation curve of the transformer is approx-

    imated by the 11th order two-term polynomial of eqn. 1.

    The resulting approximation,shown in Fig. 4, is

    = 0.28 x 10-'1$

    +

    0.72 x 10-2Q1'

    (30)

    for i and Q in per unit. I

    =

    1 p.u. corresponds to the

    transformer's rated current of 131

    A

    and Q = 1 p.u.

    corresponds to the transformer's phase-to-neutral rated

    voltage of

    V = 63.5

    kV.

    The coefficients of the approximation in eqn. 30 were

    chosen for a best fit of the high current region of the

    magnetisation curve of Fig. 4.

    702

    Fundamental solutions

    The solution for the fundamental-frequency component

    of the transformer flux can

    be

    obtained from eqn.

    14,

    which, for this case study, is given by

    111

    - 85.6916

    +

    18451;- 42.98 = 0

    (31)

    The coefficients of eqn. 31 were evaluated from eqns.

    16-18,

    with the frequencies in eqns.

    4

    and

    9

    given by

    os 377 rad/s 60 z)

    o0

    =

    53 ad/s 8.5Hz)

    ki =

    0.451

    o2 85 rad/s (13.5 Hz)

    Eqn. 31 was solved using a root-finding numerical

    routine. The results obtained are shown in Table 1

    (@

    =

    +,/

  • 8/9/2019 Ferroresonance in Power Systems

    8/9

    Table 2: Crit ical values of resistance, source voltage and

    capacitance

    Critical resistances R,= n/a

    R ,

    =

    21.4

    kfl

    Critical source voltages E, = n/a E , = 1.02P . U .

    Critical capacitance

    n/a: not applicable to this case (analytical solution is negative)

    C,,

    =

    509

    nF

    2.4~

    C

    -6

    Y.2

    0.01

    0.02 0.03

    1 0

    0.5

    1.0 1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    3.0 3.5

    4.0

    0.0

    c.

    p.u.

    Fig. 14

    Test system

    Upper inset:detail around

    C

    critical

    Lowerinset:Solution

    in

    linc r region

    Flux against series capacitance

    The critical values of the shunt conductance

    G

    (=

    1/R)

    were found from eqn. 24 using a root-finding routine.

    There was

    no

    positive solution for GI, and the plot of q5

    against

    G

    is

    as

    in Fig.

    6c.

    The plot for the test system is

    shown in Fig. 12.For values of R smaller than Rz=

    1/G,

    =

    21.4

    kR,

    i.e., for

    losses

    Larger than

    2.3%

    of the

    rated transformer capacity, ferroresonance does not

    occur. In the test system, R = 48.4 kR

    (losses

    = 1 ) and

    therefore ferroresonance can occur, as shown in the

    results of Table

    1.

    The critical values for the equivalent source voltage

    E

    were found from eqn. 26 using a root-finding routine. The

    plot of

    D

    against E is shown in Fig. 13. This plot corre-

    sponds to that of Fig. 7c in the general analysis. The @-E

    plot indicates that for the parameters of this system fer-

    roresonance can always occur,

    no

    matter how small the

    source voltage. For values of E larger than E2=

    1.02

    P.u., operation is only possible under ferroresonant

    conditions. For values of E smaller than 1.02 p.u. ferro-

    resonance may

    or

    may

    not

    occur. This is the case for the

    value of

    E =

    0.15 p.u. in the test system.

    Fig. 15

    E = 0.15

    P.u.;

    C =

    777 nF;

    R =

    48.4 kC2

    328

    Transient simulation of

    circuit

    The critical value C, for the capacitance C was read

    directly from Fig. 14as C, = 509 nF (0.093 P.u.). This

    value of C corresponds for the test system to a line length

    of 65 km. For line lengths

    less

    than 65km, ferro-

    resonance cannot occur in this system. For the test case

    value of 100 km, ferroresonance can occur. The critical

    value of the line length was also calculated for the case

    with no losses (line length for Cg in Fig. 8). This value

    was only 2.6 km. The large difference in critical line

    lengths with and without losses shows the importance of

    considering the losses in ferroresonance predictions.

    11 Conclusions

    An analytical technique for obtaining steady-state fer-

    roresonant conditions in iron core transformers supplied

    through capacitive coupling was presented. The analysis

    proposed is general for the type

    of

    circuit considered and

    includes the effect of the system losses.

    The solution to the circuits nonlinear differential

    equation is based on Ritzs method

    of

    harmonic balance.

    To apply this technique, the transformer saturation curve

    is approximated by a two-term 11th-order polynomial.

    This 11th order polynomial provides a much better fit to

    the saturation region than can be obtained with seventh

    and lower order approximations. Differences of about

    20% in the magnitude of the transformer flux were

    observed in comparisons of the 11th order against

    seventh order approximations.

    Graphical solutions were used to map the boundaries

    between normal and ferroresonant regions and to locate

    the possible operating points as a function of the circuits

    equivalent source voltage, series capacitance and shunt

    losses.

    A practical example of a system under ferroresonant

    conditions was presented. The solution points as well as

    parametric maps were calculated for this system. One

    interesting observation from this study is the importance

    of considering the transformer core losses in determining

    the margin of safety before fenoresonance can occur.

    This margin went from less than 2.6 km with no

    losses

    to

    65 km when losses were considered. Another interesting

    observation is that for certain combinations of circuit

    parameters, ferroresonance can occur even for very small

    values

    (E

    +0)of the source voltage.

    12 References

    1 DICK, E.P., and WATSON, W.:

    Transforma

    models for transient

    studies

    based

    on

    field measurements, IEEE

    Trans.,

    981, PAS-100,

    2 GERMAY, N.,MASTERO, S., and VROMAN, J.: Review of

    ferro-

    resonance phenomena in high-voltage power systems and pmen-

    tation of a voltage transformer model for predetermining the.

    CIGRE, International Conference on Large High Voltage Electric

    Systems, 21-29 August 1974.

    3 WLAN, EJ, GILLIES, D.A., and KIMBARK, E.W.: Fer-

    roresonance in a transformer switched with an EHV line, JEEE

    Trans., 1972,PAS-91 p. 12731280

    4 PRUSTY, S., and PANDA, M.: Predetermination of lateral length to

    prevent overvoltage problems due to open conductors in three-phase

    systems, IEE Proc C 1985,132,

    (I),

    pp. 4S55

    5 SWIFT G.W.: An analytical approach to ferroresonance, IEEE

    Trans., 1969,

    PAS-88,

    (l),pp. 42-46

    6 PRUSTY, S., and RAO, M.V.S.: New method for determination of

    true saturation characteristics

    of

    transformem and nonlinear reac-

    tors,IEE Proc. C, 1980 127, (2), pp. 106-110

    7 CUNNINGHAM, W.J.: Introduction to nonlinear analysis

    (McGraw-Hil l, New York, 1958 , pp. 157-168

    8

    TEAPE, J.W.. SLATER, R.D., SIMPSON, R.R.S., and WOOD,

    W.S.: Hysteresis effects in transformers, including ferroresonana,

    JEE Proc., 1976,123, (2),pp. 153158

    (1).

    PP. 409-417

    JEE PROCEEDINGS-C, Vol. J38 ,

    N o.

    4, JULY

    1991

    Authorized licensed use limited to: Universidad de chile. Downloaded on December 1, 2008 at 01:43 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.

  • 8/9/2019 Ferroresonance in Power Systems

    9/9

    13 Appendix

    Derivation of eqn.

    14

    for transformer flux

    Eqns.

    1 1

    and

    12 for

    the fundamental-frequency solution

    of

    the transform

    flux

    components(QX,my can be written,

    simplifying the notation, a s

    ux - y =

    0

    a y + bx = H

    where

    x

    =

    Y

    =

    a = -CO,' -0;) k l o ; w - l ]

    b

    =

    o J ( R C )

    IEE PRO CEED IN G S -C,

    Vol. 138,

    N O .

    4, J U L Y 1991

    (32)

    (33)

    and

    H = o , E

    Squaring eqns. 32 and 33, and adding

    a2(x2+ y 2 )

    +

    b2(x2

    +

    y 2 )

    =

    H 2

    (34)

    with eqn. 13,

    (x2

    +

    y 2 )

    = (@ +

    @

    =

    cPZ,

    and with the

    original variables

    [(U: - U;)'

    +

    k :o :@2 -2

    - Yo: - 03

    x

    k l o g

    W - '

    +

    O , ' / ( R C ) ~ ] @ ~

    U:

    E

    =

    0

    Rearranging

    (k:o:)@'

    (of - @k,w:@ +'

    + [(U,'

    -

    + o . Z / ( R C ) ~ ] @ ~0,

    =

    0

    which with

    5 =@

    gives eqn.

    14

    in the text.

    329

    I I

    r

    I