fiscal year (fy) 2016 president's budget submission ... · telecommunications infrastructure....

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Department of DefenseFiscal Year (FY) 2016 President's Budget Submission

February 2015

Defense Security Cooperation AgencyDefense Wide Justification Book Volume 5 of 5

Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide

UNCLASSIFIED

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Defense Security Cooperation Agency • President's Budget Submission FY 2016 • RDT&E Program

UNCLASSIFIED

Table of Volumes

Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency............................................................................................................. Volume 1

Missile Defense Agency................................................................................................................................................... Volume 2

Office of the Secretary Of Defense................................................................................................................................. Volume 3

Chemical and Biological Defense Program....................................................................................................................Volume 4

Defense Contract Management Agency......................................................................................................................... Volume 5

DoD Human Resources Activity...................................................................................................................................... Volume 5

Defense Information Systems Agency............................................................................................................................Volume 5

Defense Logistics Agency................................................................................................................................................Volume 5

Defense Security Cooperation Agency...........................................................................................................................Volume 5

Defense Security Service................................................................................................................................................. Volume 5

Defense Technical Information Center............................................................................................................................Volume 5

Defense Threat Reduction Agency..................................................................................................................................Volume 5

The Joint Staff................................................................................................................................................................... Volume 5

United States Special Operations Command.................................................................................................................Volume 5

Washington Headquarters Service..................................................................................................................................Volume 5

Operational Test and Evaluation, Defense..................................................................................................................... Volume 5

Volume 5 - i

UNCLASSIFIED


UNCLASSIFIED

Defense Geospatial Intelligence Agency....................................................................... (see NIP and MIP Justification Books)

Defense Intelligence Agency.......................................................................................... (see NIP and MIP Justification Books)

National Security Agency................................................................................................(see NIP and MIP Justification Books)

Volume 5 - ii

UNCLASSIFIED


UNCLASSIFIED

Volume 5 Table of Contents

Comptroller Exhibit R-1.............................................................................................................................................. Volume 5 - v

Program Element Table of Contents (by Budget Activity then Line Item Number)..............................................Volume 5 - xi

Program Element Table of Contents (Alphabetically by Program Element Title)...............................................Volume 5 - xiii

Exhibit R-2's................................................................................................................................................................. Volume 5 - 1

Volume 5 - iii

UNCLASSIFIED


UNCLASSIFIED

Volume 5 - iv

Volume 5 - v

Volume 5 - vi

Volume 5 - vii

Volume 5 - viii

Volume 5 - ix

Volume 5 - x

UNCLASSIFIED


UNCLASSIFIED

Program Element Table of Contents (by Budget Activity then Line Item Number)

Budget Activity 07: Operational Systems DevelopmentAppropriation 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

Line Item Budget Activity Program Element Number Program Element Title Page

179 07 0605127T Regional International Outreach (RIO) - Partnership for Peace Information Management System(PIMS)..................................................................................................................................Volume 5 - 1

180 07 0605147T Overseas Humanitarian Assistance Shared Information System (OHASIS)..................... Volume 5 - 11

183 07 0607327T Global Theater Security Cooperation Management information Systems (G-TSCMIS).....Volume 5 - 17

Volume 5 - xi

UNCLASSIFIED


UNCLASSIFIED

Volume 5 - xii

UNCLASSIFIED


UNCLASSIFIED

Program Element Table of Contents (Alphabetically by Program Element Title)

Program Element TitleProgram ElementNumber Line Item

BudgetActivity Page

Global Theater Security Cooperation Management information Systems (G-TSCMIS) 0607327T 183 07........................................Volume 5 - 17

Overseas Humanitarian Assistance Shared Information System (OHASIS) 0605147T 180 07........................................Volume 5 - 11

Regional International Outreach (RIO) - Partnership for Peace InformationManagement System (PIMS) 0605127T 179 07..........................................Volume 5 - 1

Volume 5 - xiii

UNCLASSIFIED


UNCLASSIFIED

Volume 5 - xiv

UNCLASSIFIED

PE 0605127T: Regional International Outreach (RIO) - ... UNCLASSIFIEDDefense Security Cooperation Agency Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #179

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Defense Security Cooperation Agency Date: February 2015Appropriation/Budget Activity0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 7:Operational Systems Development

R-1 Program Element (Number/Name)PE 0605127T / Regional International Outreach (RIO) - Partnership for Peace InformationManagement System (PIMS)

COST ($ in Millions) PriorYears FY 2014 FY 2015

FY 2016Base

FY 2016OCO

FY 2016Total FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020

Cost ToComplete

TotalCost

Total Program Element 7.081 3.270 1.750 1.750 - 1.750 1.750 1.750 1.783 1.817 Continuing Continuing

000000: Regional InternationalOutreach - Partnership forPeace Information ManagementSystems

7.081 3.270 1.750 1.750 - 1.750 1.750 1.750 1.783 1.817 Continuing Continuing

A. Mission Description and Budget Item JustificationRegional International Outreach (RIO) - Partnership for Peace (PfP) Information Management System (PIMS) is an Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) initiative.The primary focus of the program is a common information technology platform (GlobalNET) to improve international partner outreach and collaboration efforts in afederated environment. A federated environment – characterized by the capacity of DoD institutions and Partners to directly share participants and content acrossproprietary community websites - fostering networks of partner influencers and enabling better use of DoD resources through collaboration among the Regional Centersfor Security Studies, PfP and international partners, other DoD educational institutions and communities as required. The program uses a spiral methodology (makingavailable capabilities as developed), to speed the delivery of open source collaboration technologies the user community. The Defense Security Cooperation Agency(DSCA) oversees execution of the research and development of the GlobalNET effort and its operations, and ensures that the program addresses DoD securitycooperation requirements in the context of defense, interagency, and international information sharing and collaboration needs.

The GlobalNET effort focuses on improving collaboration, supporting outreach efforts, and enabling communication among the Regional Centers for Security Studies,the Combatant Commanders, the DSCA, OUSD (Policy), North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s (NATO) Military Partnerships Directorate (MPD), the PfP Consortium ofDefense Academies, PfP Partner countries, and other designated DoD institutions and communities. It provides DoD and international partner security practitioners aplatform to share information, communicate and collaborate, and improve administrative activities. It also provides the ability to form collaborative communities of interestaround security issues. GlobalNET facilitates information sharing and knowledge management concepts in accordance with U.S. policy. PIMS, as a part of the NATOEnlargement Facilitation Act of 1996, implements the Congressional endorsement for the modernization of Defense capabilities in eligible PfP countries relative to theirtelecommunications infrastructure. RIO-PIMS provides allies and partner countries the ability to collaborate in critical cooperative activities that underpin the spirit of thePfP program. The program supports PfP coalition initiatives through development of distributive collaboration tools to support aspects of U.S. and NATO-approved PfPcooperative activities. This support is important to achieve the interoperability/integration outlined in the Guidance for the Employment of the Force. RIO-PIMS supportsinternet-based education and collaboration, exercise simulations, and training center requirements.

The Regional Centers Person/Activity Management System (RCPAMS) provides an integrated student and activities management framework for the Regional Centersfor Security Studies that was designed to complement the capabilities of the Security Assistance Network (SAN). Data updates in GlobalNET and RCPAMS will beshared to ensure data integrity.

Volume 5 - 1

UNCLASSIFIED



R-1 Program Element (Number/Name)PE 0605127T / Regional International Outreach (RIO) - Partnership for Peace InformationManagement System (PIMS)

B. Program Change Summary ($ in Millions) FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO FY 2016 TotalPrevious President's Budget 3.270 1.750 1.750 - 1.750Current President's Budget 3.270 1.750 1.750 - 1.750Total Adjustments - - - - -

• Congressional General Reductions - - • Congressional Directed Reductions - - • Congressional Rescissions - - • Congressional Adds - - • Congressional Directed Transfers - - • Reprogrammings - - • SBIR/STTR Transfer - -

Change Summary ExplanationFY 2014: RIO-PIMS required $3.270 to research and implement the learning management module identified as required from multiple user communities in FY2014; move the system out of current hosted environment and deploy it in a FEDRAMP compliant hosting facility; to research the computer human interface(CHI) ensuring it is closely aligned with the new stakeholder workflow;, migrate the technology from an older code base to a newer version reducing securityvulnerabilities and making system extensions less costly to perform and maintain; deploy a native video teleconference (VTC) capability to replace the existingAdobe connect system; update and complete DIACAP paperwork and support DSCA CIO to get a GIG waiver.

FY2015: The decrease reflects sequestration reduction and SBIR/STTR transfer

FY2016: No Change

Volume 5 - 2

UNCLASSIFIED


Exhibit R-2A, RDT&E Project Justification: PB 2016 Defense Security Cooperation Agency Date: February 2015Appropriation/Budget Activity0400 / 7

R-1 Program Element (Number/Name)PE 0605127T / Regional InternationalOutreach (RIO) - Partnership for PeaceInformation Management System (PIMS)

Project (Number/Name)000000 / Regional International Outreach- Partnership for Peace InformationManagement Systems


FY 2016Base

FY 2016OCO


Cost ToComplete

TotalCost

000000: Regional InternationalOutreach - Partnership forPeace Information ManagementSystems


Quantity of RDT&E Articles - - - - - - - - - -

A. Mission Description and Budget Item JustificationRegional International Outreach (RIO) - Partnership for Peace (PfP) Information Management System (PIMS) is an Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) initiative.The primary focus of the program is a common information technology platform (GlobalNET) to improve international partner outreach and collaboration efforts in afederated environment. A federated environment – characterized by the capacity of DoD institutions and Partners to directly share participants and content acrossproprietary community websites - fosters networks of partner influencers and enables better use of DoD resources through collaboration among the Regional Centersfor Security Studies, PfP and international partners, other DoD educational institutions and communities as required. The program uses a spiral methodology (makingavailable capabilities as developed), to speed the delivery of open source collaboration technologies the user community. The Defense Security Cooperation Agency(DSCA) oversees execution of the research and development of the GlobalNET effort and its operations, and ensures that the program addresses DoD securitycooperation requirements in the context of defense, interagency, and international information sharing and collaboration needs.

The GlobalNET effort focuses on improving collaboration, supporting outreach efforts, and enabling communication among the Regional Centers for Security Studies,the Combatant Commanders, the DSCA, OUSD (Policy), North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s (NATO) Military Partnerships Directorate (MPD), the PfP Consortium ofDefense Academies, PfP Partner countries, and other designated DoD institutions and communities. It provides DoD and international partner security practitioners aplatform to share information, communicate and collaborate, and improve administrative activities. It also provides the ability to form collaborative communities of interestaround security issues. GlobalNET facilitates information sharing and knowledge management concepts in accordance with U.S. policy. PIMS, as a part of the NATOEnlargement Facilitation Act of 1996, implements the Congressional endorsement for the modernization of Defense capabilities in eligible PfP countries relative to theirtelecommunications infrastructure. RIO-PIMS provides allies and partner countries the ability to collaborate in critical cooperative activities that underpin the spirit of thePfP program. The program supports PfP coalition initiatives through development of distributive collaboration tools to support aspects of U.S. and NATO-approved PfPcooperative activities. This support is important to achieve the interoperability/integration outlined in the Guidance for the Employment of the Force. RIO-PIMS supportsinternet-based education and collaboration, exercise simulations, and training center requirements.

The Regional Centers Person/Activity Management System (RCPAMS) provides an integrated student and activities management framework that was designed tocomplement the capabilities of the Security Assistance Network (SAN). The interface between the SAN, RCPAMS, and GlobalNET will provide faculty and students aneffective information service to ensure student, activity, and alumni management. Data will be shared between the systems ensuring improved data integrity.

Volume 5 - 3

UNCLASSIFIED





B. Accomplishments/Planned Programs ($ in Millions) FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016Title: Regional International Outreach - Partnership for Peace Information Management SystemFY 2014 Accomplishments:Move the system out of current hosted environment and deploy it in a FEDRAMP compliant hosting facility. Currently the securityrequirements according to the DSCA CIO do not meet the new baseline requirements and need to be hardened. The technologyis intended to be hosted at the same facility as RCPAMS taking advantage of economies of scale. At the same time, update andcomplete new DIACAP paperwork and support DSCA CIO to get a GIG waiver.

Implement the learning management module identified as required. Users have identified the current workflow built into thesystem as incomplete and it is required to be extended. The NATO School uses an open source LMS that we will make availablevia GlobalNET with single sign –on which they currently lack this gives us economies of scale that can be realized and by usingNATO School’s open source LMS which will be less costly than extending the software for this functionality.

Common access card (CAC) enable the system. As the system was designed to support foreign nationals, it does not supportCAC authentication and with the security requirements and the inclusion of more US citizens, CAC enablement will provide moreaccess control and easier access.

Migrate the technology from an older code base to a newer version. GlobalNET is at risk for falling two major software releasesbehind, increasing the lack of supportability and development personnel. The update will certify all of the extensions and move tothe most recent stable version which will reduce security vulnerabilities and make system extensions less costly to perform andmaintain

Continue to research the computer human interface (CHI) ensuring it is closer aligned with the consolidated workflow. Wecontinue to refine the interface such that users are finding operations to be easier and more intuitive to perform.

Deploy a native video teleconference (VTC) capability to replace the existing hosted service. GlobalNET is currently bundled witha loosely coupled Adobe connect system outside of the GlobalNET stack and hosting environment. The capability would createa native VTC capability inside of the platform allowing much tighter integrations with messaging, file sharing, white boarding, andchatting and reduce the operations and maintenance (O&M) expense of leasing this service.

Work with the existing platform managers to update the GlobalNET implementation to the newest platform stable release -allowing greater functionality and better security across all members of the platform.

3.270 1.750 1.750

Volume 5 - 4

UNCLASSIFIED





B. Accomplishments/Planned Programs ($ in Millions) FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016Extend the information exchange between the RCPAMS and GlobalNET. The exchange is only working for exporting users fromRCPAMS to GlobalNET for account provisioning and there are three additional functions to implement.FY 2015 Plans:Add redundant/additional user capacity. This includes expanding the hardware and software to an alternate site to allowadditional users to access and use the system concurrently and be a backup site in the event of a disaster or failure. Because ofall of the advanced graphics and expansion of the user base, it is expected that we will need this additional capacity and the bestplan to distribute it out to an alternate location.

Ensure that discovery is much easier including adding the capability to refine search results using a keyword based refinementmethodology. The amount of data the system will be collecting dictates greater refinement of the search results. In addition, buildthe capability to allow the users to refine the data by multiple folders.

Re-engineer the security model to allow much greater granular permission on functions. The current model does not allowpermissions down to the activity level and that is need as more users are starting to restrict access to functions.

Re-engineer the email integration capabilities. Put more control on the content of sent emails and well as greater capabilities toreceive emails and incorporated them into the system as natively entered data elements.FY 2016 Plans:Add redundant/additional user capacity. This includes expanding the hardware and software to an alternate site to allowadditional users to access and use the system concurrently and be a backup site in the event of a disaster or failure. Because ofall of the advanced graphics and expansion of the user base, it is expected that we will need this additional capacity and the bestplan to distribute it out to an alternate location.

Accomplishments/Planned Programs Subtotals 3.270 1.750 1.750

C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Millions)N/A

Remarks

D. Acquisition StrategyThe GlobalNET effort employs a spiral acquisition strategy to ensure a well-defined model for each institution/community that can be exported globally. The programuses a regional approach to ensure sustainable, leave-behind technology and information sharing procedures. By partnering with other U.S. Government agencies,

Volume 5 - 5

UNCLASSIFIED





existing assets are leveraged to preserve U.S. investments, avoid duplication of effort between agencies, and offer economically prudent solutions to improveinformation sharing and achieve U.S. security cooperation goals. Independent Operational Test teams were brought on to ensure that GlobalNET and bearsindependent validation of the development team’s effort. GlobalNET has regional based personnel to assist in the adoption of the platform with partners who are notfamiliar with social collaboration and networking media. RCPAMS uses a similar spiral approach, testing and fielding approach.

E. Performance MetricsRIO-PIMS projects performance is measured in several methods: the successful meeting of stated performance objectives in the statement of work, and meetingtarget dates in the project management plan; via a combination of statistics including the number of trouble tickets generated on the development site, operational userfeedback on development site usability, and design; and the system’s performance during developmental and operational testing. The use of a 3rd party to execute theoperational test ensures that the system meets the performance metrics prior to moving to production.

Volume 5 - 6

UNCLASSIFIED


Exhibit R-3, RDT&E Project Cost Analysis: PB 2016 Defense Security Cooperation Agency Date: February 2015Appropriation/Budget Activity0400 / 7



Product Development ($ in Millions) FY 2014 FY 2015FY 2016

BaseFY 2016

OCOFY 2016

Total

Cost Category Item

ContractMethod& Type

PerformingActivity & Location

PriorYears Cost

AwardDate Cost

AwardDate Cost

AwardDate Cost

AwardDate Cost

Cost ToComplete

TotalCost

TargetValue ofContract

Defense SecurityCooperation Agency MIPR Merlin International :

Englewood, CO 7.081 3.270 Jul 2014 1.750 Jul 2015 1.750 - 1.750 Continuing Continuing -

Subtotal 7.081 3.270 1.750 1.750 - 1.750 - - -

PriorYears FY 2014 FY 2015

FY 2016Base

FY 2016OCO

FY 2016Total

Cost ToComplete

TotalCost


Project Cost Totals 7.081 3.270 1.750 1.750 - 1.750 - - -

Remarks

Volume 5 - 7

UNCLASSIFIED


Exhibit R-4, RDT&E Schedule Profile: PB 2016 Defense Security Cooperation Agency Date: February 2015Appropriation/Budget Activity0400 / 7



FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 20201 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

Deploy SystemAward Support Services Contract for Support,ISP, and Limited Equipment SupportRefine Interface for Community UseCertification and AccreditationDeploy full RCPAMS InterfaceIdentify New Institutions for GlobalNETUpgrade Core and Maintenance ReleasesDeploy to Other Institutions

Volume 5 - 8

UNCLASSIFIED


Exhibit R-4A, RDT&E Schedule Details: PB 2016 Defense Security Cooperation Agency Date: February 2015Appropriation/Budget Activity0400 / 7



Schedule Details

Start EndEvents Quarter Year Quarter Year

Deploy System 1 2014 2 2017Award Support Services Contract for Support, ISP, and Limited Equipment Support 1 2015 4 2018Refine Interface for Community Use 4 2014 4 2017Certification and Accreditation 3 2014 3 2017Deploy full RCPAMS Interface 3 2014 4 2014Identify New Institutions for GlobalNET 2 2014 4 2017Upgrade Core and Maintenance Releases 3 2014 4 2017Deploy to Other Institutions 3 2014 4 2017

Volume 5 - 9

UNCLASSIFIED


UNCLASSIFIED

Volume 5 - 10

UNCLASSIFIED

PE 0605147T: Overseas Humanitarian Assistance Shared ... UNCLASSIFIEDDefense Security Cooperation Agency Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #180


R-1 Program Element (Number/Name)PE 0605147T / Overseas Humanitarian Assistance Shared Information System (OHASIS)


FY 2016Base

FY 2016OCO


Cost ToComplete

TotalCost


000204: Overseas HumanitarianAssistance Shared InformationSystem


A. Mission Description and Budget Item JustificationThe Overseas Humanitarian Assistance Shared Information System (OHASIS) provides Humanitarian Assistance (HA) offices, including embassy staff, country teammembers, Combatant Command leads, and the Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) the capability to manage and visualize Overseas Humanitarian, Disasterand Civic Aid (OHDACA) funded projects on a web-based map display, automate report generation, coordinate with Inter-Agency and Partner Nation stakeholders, aswell as perform a variety of analysis.

Under the direction of DSCA, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Army Geospatial Center (AGC) is responsible for the entire lifecycle--from system definition todevelopment, support, training, and product improvement of OHASIS. The AGC has been responsible for the OHASIS system since 2005 and has evolved it to thepresent 2.2 system which contains more than 14,000 projects valued at more than $1.8 billion, with a community of over 3,000 users. The OHASIS system is a criticaland mission essential means for thousands of military and civilian users to develop, staff, coordinate, approve, fund, implement, and manage projects intended to assistthe Combatant Commands in accomplishing theater campaign plan objectives and achieve strategic ends states in support of U.S. national security and foreign policyinterests.

B. Program Change Summary ($ in Millions) FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO FY 2016 TotalPrevious President's Budget 0.287 0.286 0.294 - 0.294Current President's Budget 0.287 0.286 0.294 - 0.294Total Adjustments - - - - -

• Congressional General Reductions - - • Congressional Directed Reductions - - • Congressional Rescissions - - • Congressional Adds - - • Congressional Directed Transfers - - • Reprogrammings - - • SBIR/STTR Transfer - -

Change Summary ExplanationFY14-16: No significant change, the increase or decrease is a small inflation amount. The Overseas Humanitarian Assistance Shared Information Systemrequires $.3M to continue to provide web-based lifecycle management of Humanitarian Assistance projects to the Combatant Commands.

Volume 5 - 11

UNCLASSIFIED



R-1 Program Element (Number/Name)PE 0605147T / Overseas HumanitarianAssistance Shared Information System(OHASIS)

Project (Number/Name)000204 / Overseas HumanitarianAssistance Shared Information System


FY 2016Base

FY 2016OCO


Cost ToComplete

TotalCost

000204: Overseas HumanitarianAssistance Shared InformationSystem



A. Mission Description and Budget Item JustificationThe Overseas Humanitarian Assistance Shared Information System (OHASIS) enables Humanitarian Assistance (HA) offices, including embassy staff, country teammembers, Combatant Command leads, and the Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) to manage and visualize Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster and Civic Aid(OHDACA) projects on a web-based map display, automate report generation, and perform a variety of analysis.

Under the direction of DSCA, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Army Geospatial Center (AGC) is responsible for the entire lifecycle--from system definition todevelopment, support, training and product improvement of OHASIS. The AGC has been responsible for the OHASIS system since 2005 and has evolved it to thepresent 2.2 system which contains 15,000 projects valued at more than $1.8 billion, with a community of over 3,000 users. The OHASIS system is a critical andmission essential means for thousands of military and civilian users to develop, staff, approve and manage projects intended to assist the Combatant Commands inaccomplishing theater campaign plan objectives and achieve strategic ends states in support of U.S. national security and foreign policy interests.

B. Accomplishments/Planned Programs ($ in Millions) FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016Title: Overseas Humanitarian Assistance Shared Information SystemFY 2014 Accomplishments:Building upon the improvements above: the FY 2014 funding will be used to improve reporting capabilities and efficiencies,and continue development of establishing quantifiable measures of effectiveness within HA projects that can be used to assessprogram success. Specific plans include:

Operationalize Project Umbrella functionality

Develop one Year After Action Reporting data input forms

Refine and tune Humanitarian Assistance project nomination template

Refine and tune Humanitarian Assistance Mine Action project nomination templateFY 2015 Plans:

0.287 0.286 0.294

Volume 5 - 12

UNCLASSIFIED





B. Accomplishments/Planned Programs ($ in Millions) FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016Focus on developing functionality geared towards the analysis of project information, after action reporting, and assess data.Develop tools to measure long-term effects of HA steady state projects.FY 2016 Plans:Develop ways to use the data and tools, within OHASIS, to measure long-term effects of our HA projects. This includes beginningthe development of the one-year AAR by leveraging the system tools (i.e. project nomination template, 30-day AAR, etc).

Continue to find more efficient ways of integrating with other systems including Pacific Disaster Center, REDi, CooperationSecurity JCTD, GTSCMIS, USAID, CAOS, Foreign Assistance Dashboard, MARCIMs, etc.

Continue working the system accreditation through the DSCA CIO.Refine and implement the “Umbrella Project” concept within the system. The umbrella project will give users a more strategicapproach towards our humanitarian assistance investment.


C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Millions)N/A

Remarks

D. Acquisition StrategyThe program employs an incremental technology development and implementation strategy to ensure a desired capability is delivered in a relevant timeframe. Thisstrategy also will continue to leverage industry standard technologies for web development, database technology, database modeling, geographic information systems,reporting, and documentation. As additional users require the system, it will continue to be developed with scalability and maintainability as key considerations.Additionally, this capability will help DoD better collaborate and support external agencies and their programs by leveraging the web services that have been designed inthe initial baseline.

E. Performance MetricsOHASIS project performance is measured in several methods: the successful meeting of stated performance objectives in the statement of work and meeting targetdates in the project management plan, and successful management of the full life cycle of the over 1,000 Overseas Humanitarian Disaster and Civic Aid (OHDACA)projects.

Volume 5 - 13

UNCLASSIFIED






BaseFY 2016

OCOFY 2016

Total

Cost Category Item



PriorYears Cost

AwardDate Cost

AwardDate Cost

AwardDate Cost

AwardDate Cost

Cost ToComplete

TotalCost


Geospatial ResearchIntegration Develoopmentand Support (GriDS) II,IDIQ

MIPR SAIC : Alexandria,VA 0.842 0.287 Jun 2014 0.286 0.294 - 0.294 Continuing Continuing Continuing

Subtotal 0.842 0.287 0.286 0.294 - 0.294 - - -


FY 2016Base

FY 2016OCO

FY 2016Total

Cost ToComplete

TotalCost



Remarks

Volume 5 - 14

UNCLASSIFIED





FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 20201 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

1-yr After Action Reporting ModuleMeasuring Effectiveness of Projects Module" Umbrella Project"Program ModuleEstablish SIPR PresenceSIPR Data ReplicationSIPR Project PrioritizationSIPR Project AnalysisDevelop Low Bandwidth ConnectivityProject Evaluation CapabilityHandheld Data AccessHandheld Data Collection

Volume 5 - 15

UNCLASSIFIED





Schedule Details

Start EndEvents Quarter Year Quarter Year

1-yr After Action Reporting Module 1 2014 3 2015Measuring Effectiveness of Projects Module 4 2014 4 2016" Umbrella Project"Program Module 1 2014 2 2015Establish SIPR Presence 4 2014 1 2016SIPR Data Replication 4 2015 4 2015SIPR Project Prioritization 4 2016 4 2017SIPR Project Analysis 4 2016 4 2017Develop Low Bandwidth Connectivity 2 2014 4 2015Project Evaluation Capability 1 2014 3 2015Handheld Data Access 4 2015 2 2016Handheld Data Collection 4 2015 2 2016

Volume 5 - 16

UNCLASSIFIED

PE 0607327T: Global Theater Security Cooperation Mana... UNCLASSIFIEDDefense Security Cooperation Agency Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #183


R-1 Program Element (Number/Name)PE 0607327T / Global Theater Security Cooperation Management information Systems(G-TSCMIS)


FY 2016Base

FY 2016OCO


Cost ToComplete

TotalCost


1: Global Theater SecurityCooperation Managementinformation Systems (G-TSCMIS)


A. Mission Description and Budget Item JustificationGlobal Theater Security Cooperation Management information System (G-TSCMIS) Program is an Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) initiative to develop anddeploy a common web-based, centrally hosted Management Information System (MIS) that will serve as the information focus point for the Department of Defense’s(DoD) Security Cooperation (SC) efforts by providing decision makers, SC planners and other users with the ability to view, manage, assess, and report SC activitiesand events. G-TSCMIS will consolidate, improve upon, and replace legacy security cooperation systems. It will provide a comprehensive picture of SC activities, andwill contribute to planning more effective cooperative security activities to align or meet desired outcomes in support of SC end states. The program is an evolutionaryrapid Information Technology (IT) acquisition pilot program, as described in FY 2010 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) Section 804, that provides users atevery user command with greater capability through several iterations and releases that are developed and implemented over time. The Department of Navy (DoN) wasassigned acquisition lead for the effort by Deputy Secretary of Defense (DEPSECDEF).

G-TSCMIS is a fully interoperable component of Adaptive Planning and Execution (APEX) and the DoD Joint C2 (JC2) Capability. The effort will support strategicand operational planning by providing access to reports of programs, activities, events, funding, assessments, and status of achieving defined end states. G-TSCMISwill provide visualization, assessment, reporting, and data management throughout the conduct of SC activities planning and execution phases. Information from theSC activities will be binned by separate SC programs, budget lines/funding streams, equipment drawdown, etc. This will enable users at the tactical level to focus onspecific programs, participating forces, events, and activities, while users at the strategic level will be able to access summary reports of geographic regions, resourcerequirements, or total expenditure of funds by source. G-TSCMIS support to DoD's SC reporting requirements mandated by federal law for many SC programs andactivities. To adhere to U.S. regulations, G-TSCMIS reports will be tailored to include programs, events, and activities by category, geographical areas, assessments,U.S. staffing levels, and sources of funding.

G-TSCMIS will interface with other DoD systems, such as Joint Training Information Management System (JTIMS) and Joint Capability Requirements Manager (JCRM).G-TSCMIS will allow decision makers and analysts to identify redundant investments, plan more effective engagements, and find gaps and opportunities for buildingmore capable partners. The program uses multiple, rapidly executed releases of capability beginning with a Milestone B equivalent initial build decision held in Quarter1 FY 2012, which resulted in approval from the Milestone Decision Authority (MDA) to enter the Incremental and Iterative Development and Deployment (IIDD) phase.The initial releases require defined objectives and mature technology. Based on analysis of required capabilities and resources, the Program Office is planning onexecuting G-TSCMIS in five major releases, each with three iterations, across the period of FY 2012-FY 2020.

Volume 5 - 17

UNCLASSIFIED



R-1 Program Element (Number/Name)PE 0607327T / Global Theater Security Cooperation Management information Systems(G-TSCMIS)

B. Program Change Summary ($ in Millions) FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO FY 2016 TotalPrevious President's Budget 13.250 10.350 8.550 - 8.550Current President's Budget 13.250 10.350 8.474 - 8.474Total Adjustments - - -0.076 - -0.076

• Congressional General Reductions - - • Congressional Directed Reductions - - • Congressional Rescissions - - • Congressional Adds - - • Congressional Directed Transfers - - • Reprogrammings - - • SBIR/STTR Transfer - - • Inflation Reduction - - -0.076 - -0.076

Change Summary ExplanationFY 2014: USD(AT&L) transferred responsibility of continued development and sustainment of Global Theater Security Cooperation Management InformationSystem (G-TSCMIS) to Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA). First year of DSCA execution.

FY 2015: - $500K realigned to O&M for sustainment support.

FY2016: -No signficant impact

Volume 5 - 18

UNCLASSIFIED



R-1 Program Element (Number/Name)PE 0607327T / Global Theater SecurityCooperation Management informationSystems (G-TSCMIS)

Project (Number/Name)1 / Global Theater Security CooperationManagement information Systems (G-TSCMIS)


FY 2016Base

FY 2016OCO


Cost ToComplete

TotalCost

1: Global Theater SecurityCooperation Managementinformation Systems (G-TSCMIS)

- 13.250 10.350 8.474 - 8.474 12.328 12.025 11.758 11.982 Continuing Continuing


A. Mission Description and Budget Item JustificationGlobal Theater Security Cooperation Management information System (G-TSCMIS) Program is an Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) initiative to develop anddeploy a common web-based, centrally hosted Management Information System (MIS) that will serve as the information focus point for the Nation’s Security Cooperation(SC) efforts by providing decision makers, SC planners and other users with the ability to view, manage, assess, and report SC activities and events. G-TSCMIS willconsolidate, improve upon, and replace legacy TSCMIS solutions hosted at over 20 Department of Defense (DoD) Services, Agencies, and Combatant Commands(CCDRs). It will provide a comprehensive picture of whole-of-government SC activities, and will contribute to planning more effective cooperative security activities toalign or meet desired outcomes in support of SC end states. The program is an evolutionary rapid Information Technology (IT) acquisition pilot program, as describedin FY 2010 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) Section 804, that provides users at every user command with greater capability through several iterations andreleases that are developed and implemented over time. The Department of Navy (DoN) was assigned acquisition lead for the effort by Deputy Secretary of Defense(DEPSECDEF).

G-TSCMIS is a fully interoperable component of Adaptive Planning and Execution (APEX) and the DoD Joint C2 (JC2) Capability. The effort will support the strategicplanning of CCDRs by providing access to reports of programs, activities, events, funding, assessments, and status of achieving defined end states. G-TSCMIS willprovide visualization, assessment, reporting, and data management throughout the conduct of SC activities planning and execution phases. Information from theSC activities will be binned by separate SC programs, budget lines/funding streams, equipment drawdown, etc. This will enable users at the tactical level to focus onspecific programs, participating forces, events, and activities, while users at the strategic level will be able to access summary reports of geographic regions, resourcerequirements, or total expenditure of funds by source. G-TSCMIS support to DoD's SC reporting requirements is mandated by federal law for many SC programs andactivities. To adhere to U.S. regulations, G-TSCMIS reports will be tailored to include programs, events, and activities by category, geographical areas, assessments,U.S. staffing levels, and sources of funding.

G-TSCMIS will interface with other systems, such as Joint Training Information Management System (JTIMS) and Joint Capability Requirements Manager (JCRM). G-TSCMIS must also be interoperable with the other United States Government (USG) foreign assistance and international cooperation information systems. G-TSCMISwill allow decision makers and analysts to identify redundant investments, plan more effective engagements, and find gaps and opportunities for building more capablepartners. The program uses multiple, rapidly executed releases of capability beginning with a Milestone B equivalent initial build decision held in Quarter 1 FY 2012,which resulted in approval from the Milestone Decision Authority (MDA) to enter the Incremental and Iterative Development and Deployment (IIDD) phase. The initial

Volume 5 - 19

UNCLASSIFIED





releases require defined objectives and mature technology. Based on analysis of required capabilities and resources, the Program Office is planning on executing G-TSCMIS in five major releases, each with three iterations, across the period of FY 2012-FY 2020.

B. Accomplishments/Planned Programs ($ in Millions) FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016Title: Global Theater Security Cooperation Management Information System (G-TSCMIS)FY 2014 Accomplishments:Conduct Operational Test of Release 1. Obtain Full Deployment Decision (FDD) for Release 1. Retire legacy TSCMIS variantsonce all activities have migrated to G-TSCMIS.

Continue development of Release 2 software. This will include CSITs for Iterations 1 and 2, government IV&V testing, and IAtesting. Obtain IA certification of Release 2 to support making the Release operational. Conduct DT for Iterations 1 and 2. Usercommunities will participate in CSIT testing as continued early trouble report identification and risk reduction activities. Userstories and scenarios will be developed to support testing. Use Release 2 development effort to implement any necessary IA andmaintenance fixes to G-TSCMIS software.

Collaborate with JS J6 to finalize all Release 3 functional and architectural requirements in support of conducting Release 3 BuildDecision. Revise appropriate acquisition documentation to support this Build Decision.

Collect software metrics and sunk cost information to refine cost estimate, monitor Should Cost initiatives and oversee contractexecution.

Prepare Release 3 Request For Proposal (RFP) to align with contract strategy.FY 2015 Plans:Complete development of Release 2 software. This will include user community testing event of Iteration 3, governmentIndependent Verification and Validation (IV&V) testing, IA testing, and Integrated Test (IT) with operational test agencyparticipation for risk reduction. User stories and scenarios will be developed to support testing.

Hold Release 3 Build Decision. Award contract for Release 3 software development. Commence development of newcapabilities. Work with JS J6 to finalize all Release 4 functional and architectural requirements in support of conducting Release 4Build Decision. Revise appropriate acquisition documentation to support this future Build Decision.

Define Contract Strategy for software development of Releases 4 and 5.FY 2016 Plans:

13.250 10.350 8.474

Volume 5 - 20

UNCLASSIFIED





B. Accomplishments/Planned Programs ($ in Millions) FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016Program office will complete fielding of Release 2 software and development and fielding of Release 3 software. This will includecontractor, government and user community testing. User stories and scenarios will be developed to support testing.

Program office holds Release 4 Build Decision, conduct source selection for Release 4 software development and commencedevelopment of new capabilities.

Program office will work with JS J6 to finalize all Release 4 and 5 functional and architectural requirements in support ofconducting Release 4 and 5 Build Decision, revise appropriate acquisition documentation to support this future Build Decision,and define Contract Strategy for software development of Release 4 and 5.


C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Millions)

Line Item FY 2014 FY 2015FY 2016

BaseFY 2016

OCOFY 2016

Total FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020Cost To

Complete Total Cost• 0605104D8Z: Technical Studies - - - - - - - - - Continuing Continuing

RemarksFY 2013 funding was in Office of Secretary of Defense AT&L Budget in Program Element 0605104D8Z- Technical Studies.

D. Acquisition StrategyG-TSCMIS will follow the Rapid IT Acquisition approach as detailed in Section 804 of the 2010 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). G-TSCMIS will initiate anevolutionary and iterative development process for a software-only solution using multiple, rapidly executed releases of capability beginning with a Build Decision in FY2012 and enter the Incremental and Iterative Development and Deployment (IIDD) phase. Once fielded and operational on both NIPR and SIPR, users will access G-TSCMIS over a web browser with information on a centralized server. The development period is planned for FY 2012 through FY 2020. G-TSCMIS contracting usedfair opportunity competitive procedures on the Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) MAC for Releases 1 and 2. Barriers to competition were minimized by usingperformance and functional specifications and equivalent commercial standards. Releases 3 through 5 will be completed by separate contract(s). Either another IDIQMAC or MACs will be used or a new contract or contracts will be created for the final 3 releases.

E. Performance MetricsG-TSCMIS performance is measured in several outcome-based methods. The JC2 Capability Definition Package produced by JS J6 defines the Key PerformanceParameters (KPP) and Key System Attributes (KSA) to be met. JS J6 also approved specific Measures of Effectiveness and Measures of Performance (MOE/MOP),establishing thresholds and objectives for G-TSCMIS software to meet. Successful meeting of stated performance objectives in the statement of work, and meetingcost, schedule and performance targets as defined in the G-TSCMIS Acquisition Program Baseline are key metrics for the program. The use of participating Service

Volume 5 - 21

UNCLASSIFIED





Operational Test Agencies to perform operational testing ensures G-TSCMIS meets the performance metrics prior to making the software operational. Additionalstatistics based metrics, trouble tickets logged by the Service Desk, operational user feedback and IV&V and Developmental tests validate system performance.

Major Performers:Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) for Release 1 and 2 software development

Volume 5 - 22

UNCLASSIFIED






BaseFY 2016

OCOFY 2016

Total

Cost Category Item



PriorYears Cost

AwardDate Cost

AwardDate Cost

AwardDate Cost

AwardDate Cost

Cost ToComplete

TotalCost


Systems Engineering MIPR SSC LANT :Charleston, SC - 3.513 Mar 2014 2.495 Dec 2014 8.474 - 8.474 Continuing Continuing -

Software Develoopment C/CPIF TBD : TBD - 6.183 Mar 2014 0.920 Dec 2014 - - - Continuing Continuing - Software Development C/CPIF TBD : TBD - - 4.653 - - - Continuing Continuing - Systems Engineering MIPR MITRE : San Diego - - 0.203 Dec 2014 - - - Continuing Continuing -

Training Development MIPR SSC PAC : SanDiego - - 0.201 Dec 2014 - - - Continuing Continuing -

Subtotal - 9.696 8.472 8.474 - 8.474 - - -

Test and Evaluation ($ in Millions) FY 2014 FY 2015FY 2016

BaseFY 2016

OCOFY 2016

Total

Cost Category Item



PriorYears Cost

AwardDate Cost

AwardDate Cost

AwardDate Cost

AwardDate Cost

Cost ToComplete

TotalCost


Test & Evaluation MIPR Various : Various - 0.698 Mar 2014 0.247 Dec 2014 - - - Continuing Continuing - Subtotal - 0.698 0.247 - - - - - -

Management Services ($ in Millions) FY 2014 FY 2015FY 2016

BaseFY 2016

OCOFY 2016

Total

Cost Category Item



PriorYears Cost

AwardDate Cost

AwardDate Cost

AwardDate Cost

AwardDate Cost

Cost ToComplete

TotalCost


Program ManagementSupport

Option/CPFF BAH : San Diego, CA - 2.856 Mar 2014 - - - - Continuing Continuing -

Program ManagementSupport

Option/CPFF

Seaport : San Diego,CA 0.000 - 1.171 Dec 2015 - - - Continuing Continuing -

Contract EngineeringSupport

Option/CPFF

Seaport : San Diego,CA 0.000 - 0.344 Dec 2014 - - - Continuing Continuing -

Government EngineeringSupport MIPR SSC PAC : San

Diego, CA 0.000 - 0.106 Dec 2014 - - - Continuing Continuing -

Volume 5 - 23

UNCLASSIFIED





Management Services ($ in Millions) FY 2014 FY 2015FY 2016

BaseFY 2016

OCOFY 2016

Total

Cost Category Item



PriorYears Cost

AwardDate Cost

AwardDate Cost

AwardDate Cost

AwardDate Cost

Cost ToComplete

TotalCost


Travel TBDSPAWAR :San Diego,CA /Charleston, SC

0.000 - 0.010 Dec 2014 - - - Continuing Continuing -

Subtotal 0.000 2.856 1.631 - - - - - -


FY 2016Base

FY 2016OCO

FY 2016Total

Cost ToComplete

TotalCost



Remarks

Volume 5 - 24

UNCLASSIFIED





FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 20201 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

Acquisition MilestonesG-TSCMIS Rel 1 FDRG-TSCMIS Rel 3 Build DecisionG-TSCMIS Rel 2 FDRG-TSCMIS Rel 4 Build DecisionG-TSCMIS Rel 3 FDRG-TSCMIS Rel 5 Build DecisionG-TSCMIS Rel 4 FDR

Iterative & Incremental Development /Deployment (IIDD) Activities Release 3

Systems EngineeringDefine/Design/Develop Capabilities





Volume 5 - 25

UNCLASSIFIED





Schedule Details

Start EndEvents by Sub Project Quarter Year Quarter Year

Acquisition MilestonesG-TSCMIS Rel 1 FDR 2 2014 4 2014G-TSCMIS Rel 3 Build Decision 1 2015 1 2015G-TSCMIS Rel 2 FDR 3 2015 3 2016G-TSCMIS Rel 4 Build Decision 3 2016 3 2016G-TSCMIS Rel 3 FDR 1 2017 1 2017G-TSCMIS Rel 5 Build Decision 4 2017 4 2017G-TSCMIS Rel 4 FDR 2 2018 2 2018

Iterative & Incremental Development /Deployment (IIDD) Activities Release 3Systems Engineering 1 2015 1 2017Define/Design/Develop Capabilities 1 2015 1 2017



Volume 5 - 26

fiscal year (fy) 2016 president's budget submission ... · telecommunications infrastructure....

Documents