ford foundation slide show nov, 2012
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Ford foundation slide show nov, 2012](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081513/557844fed8b42a1f5b8b5357/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
How effective are public sector supply chains’ policies for rural
poverty reduction?
Phase 1: An econometric analysis of the effectiveness of supply chain public policy in promoting competitiveness and reducing poverty
![Page 2: Ford foundation slide show nov, 2012](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081513/557844fed8b42a1f5b8b5357/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Policy Framework
Law 811 9 Strategic Objectives
Decree 3800
Formalization
Res. 186 Planning Monitoring
Focus on Competitiveness
and Inclusion
![Page 3: Ford foundation slide show nov, 2012](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081513/557844fed8b42a1f5b8b5357/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
• Technical Secretary• Competitive
Agreement• Annual Action Plan,
Follow-up • Regional Secretary• Competitive
Agreement• Annual Action Plan,
Follow-up
National Council
Regional Committee
Regional Committee
Regional Committee
Thematic Committees or
Tables
Technical Secretary
Structure of National Supply Chain Organizations
![Page 4: Ford foundation slide show nov, 2012](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081513/557844fed8b42a1f5b8b5357/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Policy Focus
Indicators• High Poverty
• High Rural Poverty
• Low Human Development
• Land Inequality
• Property Inequality
Number of Supply Chains by Department
![Page 5: Ford foundation slide show nov, 2012](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081513/557844fed8b42a1f5b8b5357/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Policy Focus
10 Chains Studied • Avocado• Rice• Cocoa• Rubber• Citrus
• Fique• Fruit• Guava• Mango • Plantain
Policy not well focused on populations with
most poverty, underdevelopment and
inequality.
![Page 6: Ford foundation slide show nov, 2012](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081513/557844fed8b42a1f5b8b5357/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Targeted Poverty Intervention Programs
Alianzas Productivas
MADR
Oportunidades Rurales MADR
MIDAS USAID
ADAM USAID
Not necessarily well focused, potentially due to program objectives
![Page 7: Ford foundation slide show nov, 2012](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081513/557844fed8b42a1f5b8b5357/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Policy Effectiveness
Yield growth as a function of political performance
Policy Improved Yield
Better Income
Reduced Poverty
![Page 8: Ford foundation slide show nov, 2012](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081513/557844fed8b42a1f5b8b5357/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Calculating the Institutional Strength Index (IFI)
Regional Committee
0: None1/3: Inactive2/3: Active, Infrequent1: Active, Regular
Regional Secretary
0: None1: Regional Secretary
Competitive Agreement
0: None1/3: In Progress2/3: Approved, Inactive1: Approved, Active
IFI ScoreScale: 0-3
Higher Score, Stronger Political
Presence
![Page 9: Ford foundation slide show nov, 2012](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081513/557844fed8b42a1f5b8b5357/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Policy Strength and Variability
Average IFI Score and Degree of Variability by Supply Chain
Average IFI ScoreAverage IFI Score Degree of Variability
![Page 10: Ford foundation slide show nov, 2012](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081513/557844fed8b42a1f5b8b5357/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Policy Strength by Region
Strong positive relationship between number of supply chains and variability
Unclear relationship between IFI and number of regional committees
![Page 11: Ford foundation slide show nov, 2012](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081513/557844fed8b42a1f5b8b5357/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
How effective are public sector supply chains’ policies for rural
poverty reduction?
Phase 2: A meso-regional analysis of the implementation of supply chain policy to promote competitiveness and reduce poverty
![Page 12: Ford foundation slide show nov, 2012](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081513/557844fed8b42a1f5b8b5357/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Policy Implementation
Analyze the structure, function and results of policy implementation at the regional level in terms of:• Competitiveness• Governance• Equity • Social Inclusion • Poverty
Structured interviews with key representatives of three selected regional supply chains:
• Cocoa, Santander• Plantain, Quindio• Vegetables, Boyacá
![Page 13: Ford foundation slide show nov, 2012](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081513/557844fed8b42a1f5b8b5357/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Preliminary Findings Cacao, Santander
• Competitiveness: Improved production and yield; improved health, sanity, and maintenance of crops; lack of technical assistance
• Governance: Weak, unrepresentative strucuture; strong integration with national committee; variable support by local government
• Equity: Lack of negotiating power; stagnant market access; failure to exploit new market advantages
• Social Inclusion: Many small producers associated and represented in committee; training and education initiatives;
• Poverty: Improved production leads to better income; price fluctuation vulnerability; correspondence with poverty intervention programs
![Page 14: Ford foundation slide show nov, 2012](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081513/557844fed8b42a1f5b8b5357/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Preliminary Findings Vegetables, Boyaca
• Competitiveness: Improved production and yield; improved health, sanity, and maintenance of crops; limited spectrum
• Governance: Organized, inclusive structure; strong leadership; strong integration with national committee; under-representation of some sectors; lack of support by local government
• Equity: Improved negotiating power; improved market access; foreign/export markets identified; reduced intermediation
• Social Inclusion: Small producer associations very present and represented in committee; training and education initiatives; direct contact producer-comercializer
• Poverty: Limited Scope; price fluctuation vulnerability; limited correspondence with poverty intervention programs
![Page 15: Ford foundation slide show nov, 2012](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081513/557844fed8b42a1f5b8b5357/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Project Timeline
Phase 1: Econometric Study • May 2011- May 2012
Phase 2: Meso Study • May 2012- October 2012
Phase 3: Household Study• November 2012-September 2012