fs 4

50
CAGAYAN NATIONAL HIGHSCHOOL MISSION: We believe that people are the most important resources of our country. We therefore make the task of educating the Filipino child our singular mission. VISION: We are a people organization committed to a culture of education in public service. GOALS: We enable the Filipino youth to discover their potential in a learner-centered, values-driven teaching-learning environment; thereby empowering them to create their own destiny in a global community. We prepare them to become responsible citizens of the world and enlightened leaders who love their country.

Upload: glenda-jaygee-tejano-calagui

Post on 22-Oct-2014

11.566 views

Category:

Documents


9 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: FS 4

CAGAYAN NATIONAL HIGHSCHOOL

MISSION:

We believe that people are the most important resources of our country. We therefore make

the task of educating the Filipino child our singular mission.

VISION:

We are a people organization committed to a culture of education in public service.

GOALS:

We enable the Filipino youth to discover their potential in a learner-centered, values-driven

teaching-learning environment; thereby empowering them to create their own destiny in a global

community. We prepare them to become responsible citizens of the world and enlightened leaders who

love their country.

Page 2: FS 4

Episode 1 : “THERMOMETER CHECK”

Your Tools

For this episode, please use the activity form provided.

My Observation Report on Interaction

Name: Ruth Ann Tuddao

Glenda Jaygee T. Calagui

School Observed : Cagayan National Highschool

Year Level: II Section: 1

Subject observed: English

Observations:

Student –to-student Interaction Patterns

Students whom we observed acted in familiarity among each other. They treat and speak to

each other casually without reserve like brothers and sisters. They are always willing to work in

cooperation during group activities, open to sharing and receiving inputs from one another. Even

criticism and negative feedback from each other are taken impersonally so that miscommunication or

academic conflicts during the period are resolved and shrugged off at the end of the day.

Page 3: FS 4

Student-to-Teacher Interaction Patterns

The nature of teacher-student interaction in and outside the classroom that we observed is a

reflection of the parent-children relationship which seems to be a common characteristic among the

classes in high school. Although, the teacher is regarded as person of sole authority in the room and

students comply with her instructions, students are still able to individually approach the teacher for

difficulties in the lesson and personal concerns. At times, not all concerns are addressed individually due

to the large number of students in the class. It can seem inevitable when one is dealing with over fifty

members each with unique needs, traits and dispositions. Nonetheless, order is prevalent when the

teacher calls for it

Teacher-to-Student Interaction Patterns

More than being an educator, the teacher acts as a disciplinarian and a counselor inside the

classroom that I observed. The teacher, while delivering her instruction sees to it that she solicits

maximum participation among her students and that focus is maintained during the whole period. This

is done through reinforcements like on-the-spot feedback, negative and positive alike. Reprimands are

given cautiously while praises are given generously. She encourages questions and dialogues among her

students while she seeks to intervene when necessary. To do this, she goes around and does not stay

put on the table platform so that discussions, not lectures, are delivered. This way, she is able to see

each pupil’s responses to her instruction even behaviors that are uncalled for which she can

immediately attend to.

Page 4: FS 4

Student-to-Non-teaching Personnel Interaction Patterns

Non-teaching personnel like guards and maintenance people in the school are regarded with the

same respect given to teachers by the students. Their language and dealing with them manifest a

combination of respect of authority and consideration for the elderly.

Teacher –to-Teacher Interaction Patterns

Professionalism and camaraderie are two characteristics that are observed in the environment

of the teachers be it in the faculty room, along the corridors or in the classroom. Not one conversation

or dialogue was heard that is not of academic nature or school-related. Teachers are well too aware of

each other’s roles in school activities and programs; it is the theme in their exchanges. The manner by

which they approach one another shows acquaintanceship and team spirit.

ENRICHING ACTIVITIES

Create a scenario where any of the above interactions occurs in the school. Make a script of

their dialogue, bearing in mind that this partnership is built on developing a climate of respect, harmony

and cooperation.

Script:

Inside the classroom, the teacher let the students group themselves by seven members for an

activity. This group of high school students is in Second year, first section. Some students are attentively

listening to the instruction of the teachers while others are chatting with their seatmates.

Teacher: Class, group yourselves by seven. You’ll be having a group activity.

Student 1: Ma’am can we choose our members?

Page 5: FS 4

Teacher: Yes, you can. Choose classmates you’re comfortable working with.

Student 2: But ma’am it can’t be that way. We should do random counting of so we can have a fair

grouping.

Teacher: That is a very good suggestion. Do you prefer it that way class?

Students agreed unanimously.

The students had a random counting of from one to seven after which groupings were made.

Teacher: Are you now with your groups?

Students: Yes ma’am!

Teacher: Choose a leader and a secretary from your group and get a copy of the short story you’re going

to work with. List down all the simple phrasal and clausal modifiers found in the story and present it to

the class after.

Each group went to work for the activity but meanwhile, a cry was heard from a corner of the room. The

teacher went towards that direction.

Teacher: Oh, what’s happening here? Why are you crying? Is there a problem?

Student (Elisa): Ma’am John destroyed Cathe’s cellphone.

Teacher: Why did you that John?

John: Cathe was not cooperating with us Ma’am, she’s busy texting.

Teacher: So why did you break it? You could have just asked her to stop texting.

Page 6: FS 4

John: Actually Ma’am it’s her own fault. When I told her to stop texting and start cooperating, she got

angry and threw her cell phone my way but I was not able to catch it so it crashed on the floor.

Teacher: Is she telling the truth Cathe and the group?

Student (Elisa): John is fond of teasing Cathe Ma’am.

Cathe: Ma’am if he didn’t keep on teasing me, picking at my ears and asked me nicely I would have not

thrown the cell phone at him.

Teacher: Both of you come to my table. Meanwhile, continue working group 4.

Teacher: So John, is it true what Cathe said?

John: Yes Ma’am.

Teacher: Cathe, you could have injured someone by throwing your cellphone.

Cathe: I am sorry Ma’am.

Teacher: I need both of you to understand that we are a family here and when you are grouped, you

should treat each other as brothers and sisters and cooperate like accomplishing chores at home.

John: I am sorry Ma’am.

Teacher: Don’t say sorry to me. I would like you two sincerely apologize to each other and admit your

faults.

Cathe: John, stop teasing me everytime and I’m sorry for throwing my cellphone.

John: I am sorry too. From now on, I will stop teasing you.

Teacher: Now, you two shake hands

Page 7: FS 4

Cathe: But ma’am, what about my cellphone?

Teacher: Since you both are at fault, you two will share the responsibility of having your phone

repaired. Do you both agree?

John & Cathe: Yes ma’am.

Teacher: Cathe, swap with Nikki of group 3. Now, go to your respective groups and continue working.

Cathe: No need to swap Ma’am I’ll work with my group.

Teacher: Very good then, continue working.

Page 8: FS 4

ANALYSIS

Why is a classroom a miniature of a greater society?

A classroom is a small model of a society because in it are elements that make up the same. It

has a governing body, one who is looked up to as the source of directives, and one who has the greater

authority among members- the Teacher. It has both long-term and short-term goals to achieve. It has

members, the students-participants who are both contributory and beneficiaries in achieving these

goals. It has rules and standards agreed upon by all members which they are required to align their

performance and behavior with in order to achieve these goals successfully. Also it has external

stakeholders who influences their decisions and implementation and who also serve as their evaluator-

parents administrators, government. And like a society, roles of each element are as important as the

the other which is an evidence of their interdependence.

What are found inside the classroom that is similar to what can be found in a society?

As a miniature of a society, a classroom has essentials of its larger model. It has facilities to assist

the members implement everyday activities-chairs, tables, ceiling fans, boards, chalk etc. It has rules of

conduct implicitly and explicitly communicated through writing or verbally. Moreover, like a society its

members are as diverse. A classroom has various groups of student made different by ethnicity, socio-

economic background, culture and racial origin even.

Page 9: FS 4

Peace Concept on Focus:

Cooperation

You are able to find pleasure in working with another person because you consider this person

as a partner not a competitor. Through partnership, the task is done cooperatively and more easily.

Cooperation and Partnership in Curriculum Design

Any task done collaboratively is richer and larger in depth and breadth as it is product of various

insights, ideas and consideration which could have not been produce if it were done by one person

alone whose tendency is to look on a only few aspects overlooking other critical factors either

inadvertently or just by sheer partiality. As the product encompasses more and is a result of deliberation

and synthesis, it is more substantial and valid. Additionally, more hands and more minds mean less

unnecessary efforts exerted.

Page 10: FS 4

EPISODE 2

“Come, let’s talk”

Your Tools

For this episode, please use the activity form provided for you.

My Observation Report

Name: Ruth Ann Tuddao

Glenda Jaygee T. Calagui

School Observed : Cagayan National Highschool

Year Level: III Section: 5

Subject observed: English

Observation:

I observed that although majority of students ‘attention are caught and maintained during a class period, there will always be one or more students who is not in sync.

Situation:

The teacher is instructing students to write a composition.

The Dialogue:

Teacher: Class, make a composition entitled “A Projection”

Student 1: Ma’am what specific details are we going to write in the composition?

Teacher: It could be a projection of yourself in the future

Student 2 to another student: What title will we use?

Page 11: FS 4

Personal Reflections on the Dialogue:

It may almost seem impossible to attend to each individual student’s needs because as one

being fending to over fifty personalities at one time we can only do so much without purposeful

attention from our learners. Thus, we should always strive to make them become self-directed in

studying and learning.

ANALYSIS

How important are dialogues and substantive conversation in the classroom and in terms of

students’ learning?

Dialogues and substantive conversation in the classroom stimulate the learners to think and

reflect from their vicarious experiences and contemplate about daily learning’s application to everyday

life. They reinforce critical thinking and develop reasoning skills as students participate in discourse

among one another. This also addresses their communicative and interpersonal needs which are most

relevant to everyday situations.

What learning benefits could teachers and students draw from intentional classroom dialogue?

Intentional classroom dialogues are beneficial to both students and teachers as they serve as

channels for open and less-academic communication in a classroom. Because these types of dialogues

have intended outcome as objectives, teachers can easily detect students learning lapses through their

responses and interaction. And as such, teachers can easily create a strategy to overcome their

difficulties. It can also be a form of diagnostic method from which teachers can draw what are the

students’ weaknesses and strengths are in a particular topic by examining their responses to a prepared

conversation enacted by themselves.

Page 12: FS 4

Field Study 4Exploring the Curriculum

School Observed: CAGAYAN NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

Observers: Ruth Ann TuddaoGlenda Jaygee T. Calagui

Submitted to: Beatriz Clemente, Ph.D.

Page 13: FS 4

EPISODE 3

“TELL ME”

My Observation Report

Name: Ruth Ann Tuddao Subject observed: English

Glenda Jaygee T. Calagui Resource Teacher: Mrs. Dumayag

Year Level: II Section: 1/Aluminum

Analysis:

Why should teachers know about curriculum design?

There’s no denying what a crucial role teachers have in curriculum design. It is one of their

regular tasks to create a small-scale curriculum in the form of a lesson plan. It is required then that they

have a good understanding of what components are to be included in a curriculum and how these

components are to be assembled such that it reflects the school’s curriculum and is adapted to

maximize student learning. A background of curriculum dimensions and the principles behind each will

allow her to explore which to adapt and consider addressing learner’s needs and characteristics with

learning outcome in mind. The product of this understanding is replicated in the objectives, contents,

procedures, activities and evaluation that a teacher makes use of daily in her profession. Moreover, a

teacher’s understanding of the underlying principles behind a curriculum that was designed to be

implemented will direct her and the amount of accountability, involvement and commitment she

contributes.

Page 14: FS 4

What do most principles and theories of curriculum development have in common? How is this

commonality expressed or spelled out in the curriculum of the class you have observed?

To a certain degree, the principles and theories in curriculum development has learning as their

goal and they all recognize the active role of the teacher and the learner along the process. In the

classroom that we observed, the teacher constantly asked if she was understood or if the message she’s

trying to get across was grasp by students; seatwork, quizzes, group works, homework are also

conducted to test and for the learners to show evidence of their learning. In some instances, learners

are asked to explain a concept among each other in a peer-to-peer activity to test their ability to transfer

what they have learned. Still in other instances, they are provided opportunities to represent their

learning by constructing it in the form of dramatization, stage adaptation, dramatic reading, poem and

short-story writing during which students were asked to observe critically which is followed by insights

and feedback given by the teacher and other students alike to reinforce learning. The assessments given

were not only meant for students to score well in but also to develop a love for reading, writing and

appreciation in doing these. This is the typical proceedings in the 1 st year English class we observed, one

which religiously follows the UBD (Understanding by Design) framework.

Page 15: FS 4

EPISODE 4

“Bridging Educational Processes”

My Observation Report

Name: Ruth Ann Tuddao Date of Observation: 09/07/2011

Glenda Jaygee T. Calagui Subject observed: English

Year Level: II Section: 1

Calendar of Activities:

Activities Date Participants Mechanics

Election of Student Body July 15, 2011 Students

Nutrition Day July 24 Teachers, Students, Parents

1st Periodical Exams Aug. 8-9 Students

Festival Contests Aug. 13 Inter-school

Recognition Day Sept. 2 Students, Faculty

Awarding of

10 Most Outstanding Teachers Sept. 18 Administrators, Faculty

Intramurals Sept. 28 Students, Faculty, Administrators

*No mechanics given

Page 16: FS 4

ANALYSIS:

How significant is involvement of all stakeholders of the school in the school’s program and

activities?

The extent of the stakeholder’s involvement in the school and school’s programs is translated to

how successful these activities will result to. The school administration holds the responsibility in

leading the implementation of any program. In a public high school, it is obvious how significant

parental involvement is in providing permission for their children to participate, contributing and

funding the needs that these activities and programs will require of their children. Community leaders

and organizations are tapped upon for resources- human and material resources alike. Students and

teachers are the main recipients and contributors at the same time. The outcome of these school

activities is only as good as all their contributions summed up.

What specific principle of curriculum development justifies the importance of cooperation and

collaboration among all stakeholders of the school?

Two of the characteristics of a good curriculum as declared in the book Curriculum Development

(Purita Bilbao, Ed.D., et.al), substantiate the importance of cooperation and collaboration among all

stakeholders of the school. The first of these characteristics states that “The curriculum is democratically

conceived”. A good curriculum is developed through the efforts of a group of individuals from different

sectors in the society who are knowledgeable about the interests, needs, and resources of the learner

and the society as a whole. The curriculum is a product of many minds and energies. The second affirms,

“The curriculum complements and cooperates with other programs of the community”. There is

cooperative effort between the school and the community towards greater productivity. Additionally,

this approach which has been encouraged in more and more education and training institutions around

the world has been formally recognized as the Participatory Curriculum Development (PCD) processes.

Page 17: FS 4

PCD approaches create working partnerships between teachers, learners and other stakeholders, and

aim to increase ownership of the full learning process, thus improving the potential for effective learning

through participation (Taylor, 2003). PCD is underpinned by a number of basic principles:

o that participation is not only a means but an end in itself

o stakeholders in education who might normally be marginalized gain the right to take part in

decision-making about teaching and learning

o that as a basic human right, education can help to reduce poverty and social injustice. Greater

participation increases the likelihood of this goal being achieved, and so should be a prerequisite

for education

o participation by relevant stakeholders may take place throughout the entire curriculum

development process, including planning, delivery and evaluation.

Page 18: FS 4

REFLECTION

Peace CONCEPT on Focus:

INTERCONNECTEDNESS

A multiplicity of perspectives is important if we recognize that education is socially constructed

thus it involves interests. It is not easy to reconcile these individual interests, conflicts are likely and easy

harmony will not come effortlessly. Thus recognizing and being open while encouraging participatory

dialogue and negotiation is one way to move forward and avoid a stale and stiff outcome as in any

human endeavor. A sense of power is obtained when a member is heard and considered partner in the

process. Through establishment of collaboration, individual differences and interests become enabling

forces for change rather than remaining barriers. Compromises maybe needed but optimal participation

and interconnectedness, when practiced well, can allow us to ‘see’ and think, from a vantage point,

about the various facets of one of the world’s earliest and largest restructuring efforts -Learning.

Page 19: FS 4

EPISODE 5

“Collect and Critique”

My Analysis Report

Name: Ruth Ann Tuddao Date of Observation: 09/09/2011

Glenda Jaygee T. Calagui Subject observed: English

Year Level: II Section: 1/ Aluminum

My Analysis Report

The Topic

Literature:

Reading and Writing a

Paragraph

Recognizing Mode of

Development in

Paragraph/Selection

Recognizing Base or Root

Words – Adjectival &

Adverbial Clauses

Learning Activities

o Reading Comprehension

o Paragraph development

o Telling a story or anecdote and

reporting of events,

Assessment of Learning

Writing a

paragraph about

“How they see

themselves 10

years from now.”

Quiz

Page 20: FS 4

The Topic

Verb Tenses

-Present Tense

-Perfect Tense

-Present Perfect Tense

Simple, Phrasal, Clausal

Modifier

Information Assessment:

Distinguishing facts from

opinion.

Critical Reaction:

-Clause expressing

hypothetical situation

-Clause expressing

probable results

Learning Activities

o Dramatic Reading of “The

Women with the Wooden Bowl”

o Writing a short story

Supplementary reading of the

topic

o Individual Reading and

interpretation of family’s most

recent electric bill.

o Stage Adaptation of “Kalabashi

Kids”.

Assessment of Learning

Diad to work in

identifying verbs

and tenses used

in the school

paper editorial

article.

Assignment

Seatwork:

Classifying

random

sentences taken

from Science

textbook.

Group activity:

Providing

feedback to other

group’s

presentation.

Page 21: FS 4

My Interview Report

Name of Teacher Interviewed: Mrs. Aileen Ibanez

Year Level & Section of Class Handled: III -5

Date of Interview: 08/11/2011 Interviewer: Ruth Ann Tuddao

Glenda Jaygee T. Calagui

Challenges

Diversifying of Instruction

-to accommodate the full

diversity of academic needs that

children bring to the classroom.

Resources Needed

To vary instruction and to

address a large class, teachers

will need:

a. Supplementary Reference

books

b. Instructional videos

c. Text Projection

d. Reading literature

e. Websites

f. Experts to interview

Differentiated Instructional

Strategies includes:

a. Flexible Reading

b. Games and Authentic

Assessment

c. Real World

Learning/Authentic

Planning Strategies

Teachers need to differentiate 3

aspects of the curriculum:

1. 1. Content

-All students should be given

access to the same core content.

Struggling learners should be

taught the same big ideas as

their classmates, not given

watered-down content.

-Teachers should address the

same concepts with all students

but adjust the degree of

complexity.

2. Process

-Teachers can modify these

activities, to provide some

students with more complexity

Page 22: FS 4

Tasks

d. Tiered Questions and Open-

ended questioning

e. Self-Assessment/

Peer Learning

g. Peer Assistance/Grouping

and others with more scaffolding

(include step-by-step directions,

reteaching, and additional

models and examples),

depending on their readiness

levels.

3. Products reveal whether

students can apply learning

beyond the classroom to solve

problems and take action.

-Teachers need to recognize that

different students can create

different product. Assessment

should judge based on their

readiness levels, interests, and

learning

preferences.

-culminating projects that are

given should allow students to

demonstrate and extend

what they have learned by

working alone or in groups.

Page 23: FS 4

Large teacher-centered classes

-students have little

opportunity to deliver enough

output to be judged fairly or

receive constructive feedback

to enhance feelings of security

and success.

The teacher creates and fosters

a non-threatening learning-

ensuring atmosphere using his

understanding of the students’

background - cultural, socio-

economic and the like - which

play important role in

determining learning success

and its rate and pace.

Teachers will use a more

natural type of interaction in

the classroom with a greater

role for the students in

controlling the content and the

flow of exchange.

Testing, evaluation and

remedial teaching have to be

done to have a proper

assessment of learners’

Understanding.

In teaching English, literature

for example, is to be offered

under properly planned

divisions of the syllabus into

Page 24: FS 4

units and sub-units to ensure

conscious learning of language

structures, and an insight into

how they could be used for

compositions in oral and

written discourse.

These parts are to be further

reproduced to a format that

ensures comprehension-

questions are asked, vocabulary

exercises for synonyms,

antonyms and then right words

in right situations and

expressions, idiomatic

expression etc. are given,

composition exercises based on

the selected paragraphs or the

ideas with which the class has

been conversant are assigned

and work produced by students

where they show evidence of

what they have learned.

Page 25: FS 4

ANALYSIS:

How important is it for teachers and curriculum planners to anchor their curricular plans to

specific theories and principles of curriculum development?

Teachers and other curriculum planners should anchor their curricular plans to specific theories

and principles because it is the only way that they can own and contextualize the planned curriculum

by fitting it to their own abilities, to the needs of their students, and the available resources and

environment they have access to. It is also through this that they are given acceptable standards to

begin with, that they are made conscious between practice and theory and eventually bridge the gap.

For example, if a technical vocational school is to follow Tyler’s model, it might be found difficult to

operate perhaps due to contextual constraints including lack of planning culture, lack of time to plan,

and inadequate teacher training to plan their work. The principles in curriculum development will

prompt curriculum planners and evaluators to examine reported problems in detail and modify the

curriculum to fit their context and their objectives bringing about a more effective translation of the

model they have assumed.

Aside from the teachers, who else should be involved in the curriculum planning? Expound your

thoughts.

Curriculum planning, together with the teacher, should involve administrators, parents, students

and other stakeholders. The curriculum should be planned in the context within which it would operate.

This context can be explored and examined thoroughly if all these individuals participate in curriculum

planning. We can expect to find a variety of concerns among these stakeholders that motivate them to

lay claim in the development of the curriculum. If students were in charge they would support curricular

items that incorporate field activities, trips, and hands-on experiences. Parents support highly

supervised activities for students and ones which permit them, the parents, to come into the school at

Page 26: FS 4

will. Teachers support curricular items which enhance their control over costs and benefits of their

position as do administrators, school board members, and community groups. To gain support from

them in the long run, curriculum planning should endeavor for a structure that provides consideration to

each stakeholder’s interest and possible contribution so that the content and the organization give the

advantage of credibility and accountability to each of these power-holders of the curriculum.

Page 27: FS 4

My Reflection:

I will read friends’ Facebook news,

Check out the political views

Sweep the floor, do the laundry–

Almost anything to avoid

Curriculum planning!

Running through the check list

Does every needed lesson exist?

Or is there an important one missed?

I can add–if you insist…

I understand the necessity

Of Teacher accountability

But sometimes I wonder if really

We are better for this intricacy.

Meanwhile, I will sweep the floor

Wash the dishes, then check some more

I have finished episode 3 through four,

That just leaves another two to go

Oh, Socrates, where’s my tree

Where I can just a teacher be?

Oh, wait, perhaps a guide on file

Would have stayed that fatal cup a while.

Guess I’ll continue curriculum planning! ;)

Page 28: FS 4

EPISODE 6:

“CHECK POINTS”

My Observation Report

Name: Ruth Ann Tuddao Subject observed: English

Glenda Jaygee T. Calagui Resource Teacher: Mrs. Emma Dumayag

Year Level: II Section: 1/Aluminum

Observations:

ObjectivesThe students would be able to:I.

a. Identify modifiers

b. Distinguish simple, phrasal and clausal modifier

II. a. Read the story of

the “Woman in a wooden bowl” properly with correct pronunciation,proper stressing,tone of voice.

b. Able to give contextual meaning to the vocabularies found in the story.

Strategies

LectureGroup Work In a matrix form, each

group will write the modifiers found in the story.

Classify each modifier by placing them under column in which they belong.

Modeling correct pronunciation and stress

Group Reading

Brainstorming

Assessment

Written quiz

Group Performance:Dramatic Reading

Quiz:ReadingComprehension

Remarks

The objectives were stated simply and clearly with the desired competencies specified.

The strategies used to achieve the objectives are parallel to the objectives.

The assessment tools used appropriate measures the competencies specified in the objectives and developed in the activities done during the instructional strategy.

Page 29: FS 4

Why do teachers need to align need to align the objectives, strategies and assessment?

Objectives set what we want students to learn while instructional strategies ensure

that they learn it and finally assessment tools should reveal how well students have learned.

For this to occur, assessment tools, learning objectives, and instructional strategies need to be

closely aligned so that they reinforce one another. If assessments tools are misaligned with

learning objectives or instructional strategies, it can undermine both student motivation and

learning. For example: your assessment tool measures students’ ability to compare and

critique the arguments of different authors, but your instructional strategies focus entirely

on summarizing the arguments of different authors. Consequently, students do not learn or

practice the skills of comparison and evaluation that will be assessed. Another example of

misalignment and consequence is when your objective is for students to learn to apply

analytical skills, but your assessment tool measures only factual recall. Consequently, students

hone their analytical skills and are frustrated that the exam does not measure what they

learned.

How should teachers align their objectives, strategies and assessment? Suggest some

strategies.

Teachers should start alignment with objectives by planning backwards. Already they

should ask themselves the correct questions. What is it I want my students to know after

instruction? What is it I want them to be able to do? Once they have formulated objectives

(proposed learning outcomes) for their instruction, usually that already defines the instructional

strategies appropriate in which accomplishment of those objectives can be evaluated or

measured. It is the verb in the statement of the objective that provides a clue for assessment. It

is the verb in the statement of the objective that provides a clue for assessment. If one of the

objectives in teaching English sentence construction is "The student will recognize incorrect use

of quotation marks," determining whether or not a student has met this objective will need to

take the form of providing students with examples of correct and incorrect use of quotation

Page 30: FS 4

marks and asking them to identify those which are incorrect. The strategies used should include

drills pointing to what makes a quotation mark misplaced in the sentence. If the objective had

been that "The student will use quotation marks correctly, the content taught would probably

be the same. The instructional strategies and the assessment tools for measuring

accomplishment of objectives should, however, be directed toward students' writing and

correct use of quotation marks in what they write. The teacher also knows that in order for the

student to recognize incorrect usage, (the first example), some of the instruction has to give

students opportunities to do just that. The objective tells us that instructional activities must

include practice in recognizing incorrect uses. It also tells us that the assessment of the students'

accomplishment of the objective must be a recognition activity. The teacher needs to assess

student learning using the same types of activities in the strategies she used to teach the

desired knowledge or skill which she specified in her objectives.

REFLECTIONS:

Page 31: FS 4

What is curriculum?

When I first started the course, I wasn’t sure that I had an established definition at all. It

seemed to me that many different people used many different definitions for the term. They still do.

And while I believe I have more clarity on the issue, I’m not sure I’m ready to declare I have a definitive

answer. The more I delve into the topic, the more I find myself forced to simplicity. In my opinion,

curriculum is all the things that students learn.

Where it gets exponentially complicated starts with the very first step away from the definition.

Who gets to pick the things the students learn? This is much more difficult and opinionated.

The written, taught, and tested is a big part of that to be sure, but it isn’t all of it. Because again,

students learn as much about themselves, other people, and learning from the things teachers chose to

omit as from the things teachers choose to include. That means both the intended and unintended.

When we start picking exactly what the students will learn, we begin formulating a construct that

students will engage when learning. Obviously, there will be written curriculum that is to be taught and

then tested, but there is much more to it than that. Because it’s the bigger construct of the scope of the

curriculum that will likely have the greatest impact on a student.

If we set up a curriculum that focuses on finite, rote recitation of facts as a major outcome, we

will intend to have students complete our educational scope and sequence with a specific knowledge

base that we’ve predetermined.

Looking back at the few months of experience that I had as a student-teacher and the many

years I was as a student brings me to a better vantage point to inspect schooling in general. What

exactly is the purpose of school? It is all about learning. That is the purpose. But what exactly should be

taught? What subjects should students learn and how should we teach it? I’d like to say students

should learn what is of interest to them, but that is rife with complication. I know if I had been given the

opportunity to pick that which I would learn when I was in high school, none of the subjects would have

had any academic value. Should we continue on with the just in case model; giving students a bit of

everything just in case they might need it someday? Should we move to the just in time model that

delivers knowledge and learning right in time when it is needed or in Filipino, ‘in demand’?

Page 32: FS 4

I can absolutely see the need for students to learn how to communicate dynamically, and it is

likely there is a certain level of mathematics and science that is needed to succeed in our world, but

other than that, what should we teach? Nationalism, vocational skill, world languages, finance? What

about specific classes in project management, collaboration (the real kind, not just cooperative

learning), critical thinking, etc.?

What about me? What can I do that makes a difference in the lives of learners today? As a

future teacher, that is a valid question. For now, I know I’m not in this business to make things. To

manufacture items. To manage finances. I’m here to learn how to serve students and help them figure

out how they can most effectively learn. And I think I’d do well to first remember that not all

students run a mile per minute, nor do they learn at the same rate nor should they be gauged according

to the same measures and that learning is not a ‘race to run’ but rather a course wrought towards their

own finish lines.

As this 1-unit subject draws to a close, and I’m considering my final definition of curriculum, I’d

probably have to return to a variant of my original definition.

Curriculum is everything we want our students to learn; including the explicit and implicit of

what our efforts or our system foster for learning.

I’m sure that will continue to evolve, and I’m happy with that. I’m not ready to stop wrestling

with the concept quite yet as I still have another semester to complete.

Page 33: FS 4

REFLECTIONS: Episode 1 & 2

Ruth Ann B. Tuddao

Interaction between the teacher and the learner makes each one know each other inside the

classroom. Students differ in abilities and interests while the teacher will likely employ different

strategies to cater to these differences. Teachers should be sensitive enough to the positive or negative

interaction that exist in a classroom discussion and her role is to take a appropriate adjustment in her

methodology/ strategy should the need arises. It’s the teacher’s primary goal to motivate the students

to work harmoniously and inculcate values of cooperation and pleasantness.

Classroom dialogue could develop a close relationship between the teacher and the learner.

Every statement that comes out from the teacher’s lips may become encouragement or disappointment

to the learner. Socrates’ method could also enhance learning among students.

Thus in curriculum-making, it is necessary that the main priority is the learner. What is being

implemented is for the learner’s future not for the institution. Teacher-learner and learner-learner

interaction should be the focus. What is established inside the classroom will reflect what is established

in the society. The classroom is a miniature of a greater society. What is learned within the classroom

will be observed outside in the society.

Page 34: FS 4

Ruth Ann Tuddao

REFLECTIONS: Episode 3 & 4

Curriculum theories are also concerned with the learner’s learning environment. Learning environment should be conducive for learning. It is where students owe the realization of their potential. It promotes and facilitates the individual’s discovery of the personal meaning of idea. Learning environment must consistently recognize learner’s right to make mistakes. Where learners develop trust to themselves where they feel accepted and respected despite who they are. That the clear and enthusiastic voice of the teacher elicits equally eager and keen response from the students, help create a conducive and beneficial atmosphere for learning. Learning does not exist only between the teacher and the learner. It has to do something which happens in the unique world of the learner. It flourishes in situation in which teaching is seen as facilitating process that assist learner to explore and discover the personal meaning of events for them.

As to subject matter, it should be aligned with the lesson objectives. Where it considers the learner’s interest and the level of their comprehension. Instructional resources must take into consideration in exploring the curriculum. The materials to be used must be easily found and necessary for the learning activity. The school must be sufficient enough to provide the instructional material.

Page 35: FS 4

REFLECTIONS: Episode 5 & 6

My most meaningful experience in this episode is the teaching strategy used by the teacher.

Giving group activities to the students. Through group activities, students would develop cooperative

and collaborative learning. Interaction among others would also be enhanced. An example of this is

making role plays among group. Development of the different intelligence of the learners is being

emphasized. The cognitive, affective and psychomotor skills are given consideration. I’ve seen that this

strategy is being enjoyed by the students. Not only is it enjoyment but it is also one way to break the

diversity among the group of learners. It is not new to the teachers that within the classroom, students

are not necessarily come from a certain group but rather from different families and culture.

I’ve realized that to become a better teacher, you must be equipped with such different

strategies to catch the attention of the students. As they say, there are no dull students, no dull subjects;

it is the teachers. How the discussion flows lies on his the hands of the teacher. A better teacher does

not merely concentrate with the fulfillment of the subject content. But rather it is how much the learner

have learned.