g joni filed
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/20/2019 g Joni Filed
1/20
~ .
~ ~ l l
~ ~ :
.
~ ~ ,
~
~ ~ ~ r
~
~
. ~
; .
_ i
~ , _ 1
7 1
I '
: .
P
RO
S
S
OR
S
-
8/20/2019 g Joni Filed
2/20
T
AB
LE
OF
CO
NT
EN
TS
TA
BL
E
O
F
C
ON
TE
NTS
.
..
...
..
..
..
..
..
...
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
.
TABLE
OF
AUTHORITIES ............................... ii
IS
SU
E
PR
ES
EN
TE
D
ST
AT
EM
EN
T
OF
T
HE
C
AS
E,
AN
D
S
TA
TE
ME
NT
OF
T
HE
F
AC
TS
..
..
..
...
..
.
.
..
..
..
..
1
I
NT
ER
ES
T
O f f
AN
IIC
I _CC
~R
I E
..
..
..
..
..
.:
...
..
..
..
l
AR
GU
ME
NT
.
...
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
.
.
..
..
...
..
..
..
..
..
..
.
2
I
.
Br
oa
d
i
nj
un
ct
io
ns
s
uc
h
as
t
he
on
e
i
n
th
is
c
as
e,
v
io
la
te
the
Fi
rs
t
A
me
nd
me
nt
.
..
..
..
..
..
...
.
2
II
.
Re
st
ri
cti
ng
s
pee
ch
ab
ou
t
an
ex
-
lo
ve
r
s
l
if
e
un
co
ns
ti
tu
ti
on
al
ly
re
st
ri
ct
s p
eo
pl
e
s
ab
il
it
y
to
S
pe
ak
a
bo
ut
t
hei
r
ow
n
l
ive
s
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
6
I
II
.
Al
lo
wi
ng
su
ch
b
ro
ad
i
nj
un
ct
io
ns
w
ou
ld
o
pe
n
t
he
do
or
t
o
s
up
pr
es
si
ng
a
br
oa
d
r
an
ge
o
f
s
pe
ec
h.
..
..
9
C
ON
CL
US
IO
N
..
..
..
..
..
.
.
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
...
..
..
..
..
.
1
4
i
-
8/20/2019 g Joni Filed
3/20
T
A
BL
E
O
F
A
UT
H
OR
I
TI
ES
C
as
e
s
An
o
ns
e
n
v
:
D
on
a
hu
e
,
85
7
S
.W
.2
d
7
0
0
(
Te
x
.
Ct
.
Ap
p
..
20
0
3)
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
..
.
..
.
.
~
9
Bo
no
m
e v
.
__
Ka
y
se
n~
_
17
M a
s s
L
R
p
tr
:
~
y
~,
20
04
W
Z
1
1
94
7
31
(
M
as
s.
Su
p
er
.
Ct
.
2
00
4
)
..
.
..
..
.
..
6,
7
,
9
Br
a
nd
en
b
ur
g
v
.
O
h
io
,
3
9
5
U.
S.
44
4
(
1
96
9
)
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
C
ar
e
P
ro
t
ec
t
io
n
o
f
E
di
t
h,
42
1
M
as
s
.
70
3.
(
19
9
6)
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
..
.
2
,
4
an v. Ellis, 770 S.E.2d 851 (Ga.
2Q7.~)............
10
C
ol
l
in
s
v.
B
a
za
n
, 5
68
S
.E
.
2d
7
2
(
G
a.
C
t
.
Ap
p
.
.2
00
2
)
.
.
..
.
.
.
..
.
..
.
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
..
4
C
om
m
on
w
ea
lt
h
v.
J
oh
n
so
n
,
4
7
0
M
as
s
.
3
00
(
2
01
4
).
.
,.
.
..
.
2
F
l
as
h
v.
H
ol
t
sc
la
w
;
78
9
N
.
E.
2d
9
55
(I
nd
.
Ct
.
A
p
P.
2
00
3
)
.
..
.
..
.
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
..
.
..
.
12
G
er
t
z
v.
R
o
be
r
t W
e
lc
h
,
In
c
.,
41
8
U
.S
.
3
23
(
19
7
4j
..
.
..
.
..
.
.
..
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
..
.
..
,
..
.
;.
.
..
. 9
H
es
s
v
, In
di
a
na
.,
41
4
U
.S
.
1
0
5
(1
9
73
)
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
..
H
us
tl
e
r
M
a
ga
z
in
e
,
In
e
.
v.
F
al
w
el
l
,
48
5
U.
S
.
4
6
(1
9
88
)
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
•
•
..
.
..
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
..
8
Ki
m
be
r
li
n
v.
W
a
lk
e
r,
No
.
0
60
1
SP
0
19
7
92
0
12
(M
d
.
M
on
tg
o
me
r
y
C
o
un
t
y
Di
st
.
C
t
.
M
ay
1
9
,
20
1
2)
.
.
..
.
..
.
11
Ki
m
be
r
li
n
v.
Wa
l
ke
r
, N
o.
8
5
26
D
(
Md
.
Mo
n
tg
o
me
r
y
Co
u
nt
y
Cr
C
t
.
J
ul
y
5,
2
0
12
)
.
.
..
.
..
.
..
..
.
..
..
.
..
11
Kl
e
em
v
.
H
am
ri
cl
~
,
N
o
.
CV
1
1
7
61
9
54
(
Oh
i
o
C
t.
Co
m
.
P
1
. A
u
g.
1
5
, 2
0
11
)
.
..
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
..
.
..
.
..
.
11
L
am
o
nt
v
. Gi
l
da
y
,
No
.
0
7-
2-
3
7
03
0
-7
S
EA
,
00
8
W
L
4
44
8
65
2
(
W
as
h.
Su
p
er
.
Ct
.
M
a
r.
5
,
20
08
)
.
.
..
.
..
..
.
1
3
M
ar
t
in
v.
F
e
rg
u
so
n,
N
o
.
l
O
CV
2
32
6
(W
i
s.
C
i
r.
C
t
.
Ju
n
e
2
2,
20
1
0)
..
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
..
.
..
.
..
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
..
.
..
.
1
2
1
1
-
8/20/2019 g Joni Filed
4/20
Mo
re
l
li
v
.
M
o
re
l
li
,
N
o
.
A0
6
-0
4-
6
.0
75
0-
C
(
P
a.
C
t.
C
om
.
P
l
. Ju
ne
6
,
20
1
1)
,
.
..
.
..
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
12
N
A
AC
P
v.
C
la
i
bo
r
ne
H
ar
d
wa
r
e C
o
.,
4
5
8
U
.
S.
88
6
(1
9
82
)
.
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
.•
.
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
..
.
..
2,
3
,
4
,
9
Ne
br
a
sk
a
Pr
e
ss
A
s
s
n
v
.
Stuart,
427 U.S.
539
19
76
).
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
3
Nl
a
n
v
.
V
~l
e
nt
ir
_
N
o.
_
1~
~7
1~
n
23
5
,
M~
~
~.
P
t
t
sf
~
Z
d
Di
st
.
Ct
.
Ju
l
y 9
,
2
0
12
)
.
..
.
..
.
..
..
.
..
.
1
2
N
il
an
v.
V
a
le
n
ti
,
No
.
1
2
27
R
0
23
5
.
M
as
s
.
P
i
tt
s
fi
e
ld
Di
st
.
C
t
. J
u
ne
2
7
, 2
01
2
) .
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
12
N
y
er
v.
M
un
o
z
Me
n
do
z
a,
3
85
M
as
s
.
1
84
(1
9
82
)
..
.
..
.
..
.
.
4
O
'B
r
ie
n
v.
B
o
ro
w
sk
i
,
4
61
M
a
ss
.
4
15
(2
0
12
).
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
2
O
rg
a
ni
z
at
io
n
f
or
a
B
e
tt
e
r
A
us
t
in
v
.
K
ee
f
e,
40
2
U.
S
. 4
1
5
(
1
97
1)
.
.
..
.
..
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
..
.
..
.
..
2
,
4
,
9
P
eo
p
le
v
.
Be
t
he
a
,
1
M
is
c.
3
d
9
0
9(
A
),
2.
00
4
WL
19
0
05
4
(
N.
Y
.
C
r
im
.
C
t.
.
20
0
4)
.
..
.
..
.
..
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
3
S
ch
m
id
t
v
.
F
e
rg
u
so
n
,
N
o.
10
C
V1
6
11
(
Wi
s
.
Ci
r
.
C
t
.
A
pr
.
9,
20
1
0)
.
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
.
12
S
en
e
y
v.
M
o
rt
h
y,
46
7
Ma
s
s.
5
8
(2
0
14
)
..
.
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
2
S
ny
de
r
v.
P
he
l
ps
,
5
6
2 U.
S.
4
4
3
2
0.
11
)
..
..
.
..
.
..
.
.
8
We
l
yt
ok
v
.
Z
i
ol
k
ow
s
ki
,
7
5
2 N.
W
.2
d
35
9
(
W
is
.
C
t.
A
pp
.
2
00
8
) .
..
.
..
.
.
..
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
.
.
.
..
.
..
.
..
1
3
O
t
he
r
So
u
rc
e
s
A
ar
on
H
.
Ca
p
la
n,
F
re
e
Sp
ee
c
h
an
d
C
iv
i
l
H
ar
a
ss
m
en
t
Or
de
r
s,
64
H
a
st
i
ng
s
L
.
J.
7
81
(
20
1
3)
.
.
..
.
.
..
.
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
..
.
..
Andrew
Amelinekx,
Judge
Gives.
Nilan Harassment
P
ro
te
c
ti
o
n
fr
o
m
V
a
le
n
ti
; O
r
de
r
s
H
i
m
t
o
Re
d
ac
t
B
1_
og
Be
r
ks
h
ir
e
E
ag
l
e,
J
un
e
27
,
20
1
2
.
..
..
.
.'
.
.,
,
,
1
2
Eu
g
en
e
V
o
lo
k
h,
O
ne
-
To-
O
ne
Sp
e
ec
h
v
s.
On
e
-
T
o-
Ma
n
y
S
p
ee
c
h,
C
r
im
in
a
l
H
ar
a
ss
m
en
t
L
a
ws
, an
d
C
yb
e
r
st
a
lk
n
g
, 1
07
N
w.
U.
L
.
R
ev
.
7
31
(
20
1
3)
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
.
.
..
.
..
.
..
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
..
..
.
..
.
. 2
i
ii
-
8/20/2019 g Joni Filed
5/20
So
nj
a
R.
W
e
st
, T
he
S
to
r
y
o
f
Me
:
T
he
Un
de
r
pr
ot
e
ct
io
n
o
f
A
ut
ob
i
og
ra
p
hi
ca
l
S
pe
ec
h
,
8
4
W
as
h U
.
L
.
R
ev
.
9
05
2
00
6
)
zv
-
8/20/2019 g Joni Filed
6/20
IS
S
UE
P
RE
S
EN
TE
D,
ST
AT
E
ME
NT
O
F
T
H
E
C
A
SE
,
AN
D
ST
AT
E
ME
NT
O
F
T
HE
F
AC
TS
A
mi
d
a
do
pt
th
e
i
ss
ue
p
re
se
n
te
d,
st
a
te
me
nt
o
f
t
he
ca
s
e,
an
d st
a
te
me
n
t
of
.t
he
f
ac
ts
s
ub
mi
t
te
d b
y
E
r
an
Gj
n
i
'
I
NT
~R
ES
P
OF
AN
II
CI
..
.C
UR
IAE
Pr
of
e
ss
or
s
V
ol
ok
h
a
nd
Ca
p
la
n
a
re
bo
t
h
e
x
pe
rt
s
o
n
t
he
F
ir
s
t
Am
e
nd
me
nt
a
nd
au
t
ho
rs
of
c
o
ns
ti
t
ut
io
na
l
l
a
w
t
ex
tb
o
ok
s1
a
s
w
el
l
a
s
m
a
ny
ar
ti
c
le
s
on
fr
ee
sp
e
ec
h,
in
-
cluding
--
most
relevant_
~o this case . Eugene Vo-
lo
kh
,
F
re
e
do
m
o
f
Sp
e
ec
h
a
n
d
I
nf
or
m
at
io
n
P
ri
v
ac
y:
T
h
e
T
r
ou
bl
i
ng
I
mp
li
ca
t
io
ns
o
f
a
Ri
g
ht
t
o
.
St
op
P
eo
pl
e
fr
o
m
S
pe
ak
i
ng
A
bo
ut
Y
ou
,
52
St
a
n.
L.
R
e
v.
1
04
9
(2
0
00
);
Eu
-
g
e
ne
V
o
lo
kh
,
O
ne
-
To
-
On
e
Sp
ee
ch
v
s.
O
ne
-
T
o-
Ma
n
y
S
pe
e
ch
,
Cr
i
mi
na
l
Ha
r
as
sm
e
nt
L
aw
s,
an
d
Cy
b
er
st
a
lk
n
g,
1
07
N
w.
U
.
L
.
R
ev
.
7
31
(
20
1
3)
;
a
nd
Aa
ro
n
C
ap
la
n
,
Fr
ee
Sp
e
ec
h
an
d
.
Ci
v
il
H
ar
a
ss
me
n
t
Or
de
rs
,
64
H
as
ti
n
gs
L
.J
.
7
8
1
(
20
1
3)
.
A
n
am
ic
u
s
cu
ri
ae
b
ri
ef
is
de
s
ir
ab
le
i
n
t
h
is
ca
se
b
ec
au
s
e
o
f
t
he
si
gn
i
fi
ca
nt
.
q
ue
st
i
on
s
o
f Fi
r
st
Am
e
nd
me
n
t
la
w
r
ai
s
ed
by
t
he
a
p
pe
al
.
1
E
ug
en
e
V
ol
o
kh
,
T
h
e
.
Fi
rs
t
Am
en
d
me
nt
an
d
Re
la
te
d
S
t
at
ut
es
(
5t
h
e
d
.
20
1
3)
;
A
ar
o
n
C
ap
l
an
,
An
I
nt
eg
ra
t
ed
Ap
p
ro
ac
h
to
C
on
s
ti
tu
t
io
na
l
L
a
w
(
2
01
5)
.
1
-
8/20/2019 g Joni Filed
7/20
AR
GU
ME
N
T
I
. B
ro
ad
i
nj
un
c
ti
on
s
,
su
c
h as
th
e
o
ne
i
n
th
is
c
a
se
,
v
i
ol
at
e
th
e
F
i
rs
t
A
me
n
dm
en
t
Th
e
in
j
un
ct
i
on
in
t
hi
s
c
as
e,
b
ar
ri
n
g
t
h
e
po
st
i
ng
o
f
a
l
l
in
f
or
ma
t
io
n
a
bo
ut
M
s.
Va
n
V
al
k
er
bu
r
g,
is
a
n
u
n
-
e
on
s
t
tu
t
on
~
pr
io
r
re
st
r
ai
nt
A
n
_
in
j
z n ~
~ t
a ~ s
a ~
~
k~
~~
fo
r
bi
ds
sp
ee
ch
a
ct
iv
i
ti
es
i
s
a
cl
a
ss
ic
e
xa
mp
le
o
f
a
p
r
io
r
r
es
t
ra
in
t
.
C
ar
e
Pr
o
te
ct
i
on
of
Ed
it
h
,
42
1
M
as
s.
7
03
,
70
5
(1
99
6)
;
s
ee
a
ls
o
Or
g
an
iz
at
i
on
f
o
r
B
et
-
ter Austin v. Keefe, 4Q2 U.S.
.415.
(1971) (striking
do
wn
r
i
i
nj
u
nc
ti
o
n
ba
rr
i
ng
le
a
fl
et
t
in
g
cr
i
ti
ca
l
of
a
r
e
al
es
t
at
e
a
ge
n
t)
; N
A
AC
P
v.
C
l
ai
bo
r
ne
H
ar
dw
a
re
C
o.
,
4
58
U.
S
.
8
86
,
89
3
,
9
24
n.
6
7 (1
98
2
)
(
st
ri
k
in
g
do
wn
a
n
in
j
un
ct
i
on
b
ar
r
in
g
d
em
e
an
in
g
a
nd
ob
s
ce
ne
sp
ee
c
h
ab
ou
t
pe
op
l
e
w
ho
r
e
fu
se
d
to
p
ar
ti
c
ip
at
e
in
a
b
oy
co
t
t)
;
Aa
ro
n
H.
C
ap
l
an
,
F
re
e
Sp
e
ec
h an
d
C
iv
i
l H
ar
a
ss
me
n
t
O
r-
d
e
rs
,
6
4
Ha
st
i
ng
s
L
.J
.
78
1,
81
7-
2
6
(2
01
3
).
I
nd
ee
d
,
e
ve
n
c
ri
mi
n
al
p
un
i
sh
me
n
t
o
f
s
up
p
os
ed
ly
h
a
r-
a
s
s[
in
g
]
s
pe
ec
h
ab
o
ut
a
pe
rs
o
n is
pe
rm
i
ss
ib
le
o
nl
y if
t
he
sp
e
ec
h f
it
s
wi
th
in
a
F
ir
s
t
A
m
en
dm
e
nt
e
x
ce
pt
io
n.
..
C
om
m
on
we
a
lt
h v
.
J
oh
ns
o
n,
47
0
Ma
s
s.
30
0,
3
10
, 31
1
n
.1
2
(2
0
14
);
O
'B
r
ie
n
v
.
B
o
ro
ws
k
i,
4
61
Ma
ss
.
4
15
,
4
22-
2
3
2
-
8/20/2019 g Joni Filed
8/20
(2
01
2)
;
2
E
ug
en
e
Vo
lo
k
h,
O
n
e-
T
o
-
O
ne
Sp
ee
c
h
v
s
.
O
ne
=T
o-
Ma
ny
.
Sp
e
ec
h,
C
ri
mi
n
al
Ha
r
as
sm
e
nt
L
aw
s,
an
d
C
yb
er
-
st
al
ki
ng
.,
10
7
N
w.
U
.
L
.
Re
v.
73
1,
.
75
1
-
6
2,
7
7
3-
93
(
20
1
3)
; Pe
op
l
e
v
.
Be
t
he
a,
1
M
is
c.
3d
9
09
(
A)
,
2004 WL
19
00
5
4,
*1
-
*2
(N
.Y
.
C
rm
.
C
t.
2
00
4)
(r
ej
.e
et
in
g
c
ri
mi
-
na
l
ha
ra
s
sm
en
t
pr
os
e
cu
ti
o
n
o
f
w
om
an
w
ho
h
ad
p
os
t
ed
l
ea
fl
e
ts
sh
a
rp
ly
cr
i
ti
ci
z
in
g
t
he
a
ll
eg
e
dl
y
d
ea
d
be
at
f
at
he
r
of
h
er
ch
il
d
,
an
d
r
el
yi
n
g
on
t
he
pr
in
c
ip
le
t
ha
t
Am
er
i
ca
ns
ar
e
,
af
te
r
a1
1
,
f
re
e
to
c
r
it
ic
i
ze
o
ne
a
n-
ot
h
er
)
.
I
t
f
ol
lo
w
s
th
at
a
pr
io
r
re
s
tr
ai
n
t
o
f
s
pe
e
ch
-
-
th
e mo
st
se
ri
o
us
a
nd
t
he
l
e
as
t
to
l
er
ab
le
in
f
ri
ng
em
e
nt
on
Fi
r
st
Am
e
nd
me
nt
ri
g
ht
s,
Ne
b
ra
sk
a
P
r
es
s
A
ss
n
v.
S
tu
a
rt
, 42
7
U
; S
:
53
9,
.
55
9
{
19
7
6)
--
wo
ul
d
b
e
un
c
on
st
i
tu
ti
o
na
l,
t
o
o,
at
l
ea
s
t
i
f
(
as
he
re)
.
it
is not
limited to
speech that fits
within ~n
excep-
t
on
.
Ev
e
n th
e
n
a
rr
ow
e
r
r
es
t
ri
ct
i
on
on
s
p
ee
ch
t
ha
t
e
n
-
c
ou
r
ag
e
s]
`
ha
t
e m
ob
s,
'
i
f
se
ve
r
ed
f
ro
m
t
he
re
s
t
o
f
.
th
e
i
nj
u
nc
ti
o
n,
=
wo
u
ld
b
e
u
nc
o
ns
ti
tu
t
io
na
l
.
T
ha
t
re
-
s
t
rc
t
o
n
i
s
n
ot
li
mi
t
ed
t
o
sp
ee
c
h
th
at
f
it
s
w
i
th
in
a
F
ir
st
A
me
n
dm
en
t
e
xc
e
pt
io
n
,
he
r
e
s
pe
ec
h
th
at
i
s
in
t
en
d-
2
T
h
e
mo
ot
ne
ss
an
al
y
si
s
i
n
O
'B
ri
e
n
wa
s
mo
d
if
ie
d
by
S
e
ne
y
v.
M
or
h
y,
46
7 Ma
s
s.
5
8,
6
1
-6
3
(2
01
4
),
bu
t
t
he
F
ir
s
t
Am
e
nd
me
n
t
ho
ld
i
ng
o
f
O'
B
ri
en
.
re
m
ai
ns
go
od
l
aw
,
id
.
a
t 6
3-
6
4.
-
8/20/2019 g Joni Filed
9/20
e
d
t
o
a
nd
li
ke
l
y
to
p
ro
mo
t
e
i
mm
i
ne
nt
l
aw
le
s
s
co
nd
u
ct
,
Br
an
d
en
bu
r
g
v
.
O
h
io
,
39
5
U
.S
.
44
4,
44
7
(
19
6.
9)
;
He
ss
v.
I
n
di
an
a
,
41
4
U
.S
.
10
5,
1
08
-
09
(
19
73
)
.
I
n
de
ed
,
t
he
n
-
ju
n
ct
io
n
i
n
Cl
a
ib
or
n
e
Ha
rd
w
ar
e
i
n
vo
lv
ed
s
pe
ec
h
t
ha
t
,
ac
c
or
di
n
g
to
t
he
p
l
ai
nt
i
ff
s
i
n
t
h
at
c
as
e,
ha
d
th
e
po
-
t
e
n
ta
l
to
le
a
d
o
th
er
s
to
r
et
al
ia
t
e
a
ga
i
ns
t
t
he
t
ar
ge
t
o
f
t
he
sp
e
ec
h,
4
58
U.
S
.
a
t
9
04
-
05
;
y
et
t
he
C
o
ur
t
n
o
ne
=
t
he
le
s
s
ov
er
t
ur
ne
d
th
e
i
n
ju
nc
t
io
n.
L
ik
e
wi
se
,
e
ve
n
an
in
j
un
ct
i
on
b
an
n
in
g
o
n
ly
c
o
mm
u
nc
a
t
o
n
of
i
nf
o
rm
at
i
on
ab
ou
t
V
an
Va
l
ke
rb
u
rg
's
`
p
er
so
n
al
l
if
e
wo
u
ld
l
ik
e
ly
be
un
co
n
st
it
u
ti
on
a
l,
S
pe
e
ch
r
e-
c
oo
n
s
a
i
me
d
at
p
ro
te
c
ti
ng
p
ri
va
cy
:
,
l
ik
e
ot
he
r
re
-
st
r
ic
ti
o
ns
,
mu
st
co
mp
l
y
w
it
h
th
e
Fi
rs
t
Am
e
nd
me
n
t.
S
ee
,
e
.g
.
Ca
r
e
P
r
ot
ec
ti
o
n o
f E
di
th
,
42
1
Ma
s
s.
a
t
7
05
-
06
.
Mere
intrusion on
a
person's alleged privacy inter-
es
t
i
s
n
o
t
by
i
ts
el
f
a
de
qu
a
te
.
ba
se
.
an
w
hi
ch
t
o
pr
e
di
ca
te
a
b
ro
ad
pr
i
or
re
st
r
ai
nt
on
an
o
th
er
'
s
fr
e
e
s
pe
ec
h
.
N
y
er
v
.
M
un
o
z Me
nd
o
za
,
38
5
M
as
s.
18
4
,
.
18
9
(1
9
82
).
D
es
i
gn
at
i
ng
c
on
d
uc
t
a
s
a
n
in
va
si
o
n
o
f
pr
iv
ac
y
is
no
t
su
ff
i
ci
en
t
su
pp
o
rt
an
i
nj
un
c
-
Li
on
a
ga
in
s
t
sp
e
ec
h,
at
l
ea
st
w
he
n
a
pl
a
in
ti
f
f
i
s
n
ot
at
t
em
pt
in
g
t
o
s
to
p t
he
f
l
ow
o
f
in
fo
r
ma
ti
on
in
t
o
h
is
ow
n ho
us
e
ho
ld
,
bu
t
to
t
he
pu
bl
i
c.
K
ee
f
e,
4
02
U.
S
.
a
t
4
1
9-2
0
.
0
-
8/20/2019 g Joni Filed
10/20
Tn
de
ed
, a
G
eo
rg
ia
a
ppe
ll
at
e
c
as
e
h
eld
th
at
,
f
or
Fi
rs
t
Am
en
dm
en
t
re
as
on
s,
s
ta
lk
in
g
st
at
ut
es
wo
ul
d
no
t
au
th
or
iz
e a
n i
nj
un
ct
io
n
eve
n
a
ga
in
st
e
xt
rem
el
y
i
ns
en
-
st
v
e
s
pe
ec
h
p
ub
li
sh
in
g
o
r
di
sc
us
si
ng
[an
ex-
g
ir
lf
ri
en
d'
s]
p
ri
va
te
me
di
ca
l
c
on
di
ti
on
,
Co
ll
in
s
v.
Baz
an
,
5
68
S.
E.
2d
7
2,
73
-7
4
(
Ga
.
C
t.
A
pp
.
2
00
2)
.
I
t
w
ou
ld
fo
ll
ow
t
ha
t
a
b
ro
ad
ba
n
on
s
pe
ech
d
is
cu
ss
in
g
p
er
so
n'
s
p
er
so
na
l
l
if
e
_w
ou
l
d
b
e
u
nc
on
st
it
ut
io
na
l,
to
o.
Ev
en
if
s
om
e
v
er
y
nar
ro
w
in
ju
nc
ti
on
s
ag
ai
ns
t
~s
pe
ee
h
m
ay
so
me
ti
me
s
be
ju
st
if
ie
d
o
n
p
riv
ac
y
g
ro
un
ds
,
a
b
an
on
a
ll
s
pe
ec
h
ab
ou
t
a
p
er
so
n'
s
pe
rs
on
al
l
if
e
ca
nn
ot
b
e.
T
hi
s
ca
se
is
no
t
a
bo
ut
w
he
th
er
Mr
.
G
jo
ni
c
ou
ld
b
e
h
el
d
li
ab
le
fo
r
d
is
cl
os
ur
e
of
pr
iv
at
e
f
ac
ts
as
t
o
so
me
of
his statements.
It
is
not
. about
whether some
of
Mr.
G
jo
ni
's
re
ad
er
s
co
ul
d
b
e
cr
im
in
al
ly
p
un
is
he
d,
or
hel
d
ci
vi
ll
y li
ab
le
,
f
or
an
y t
hr
eat
s
t
he
y
m
ad
e a
ga
in
st
M
s.
Va
n
V
al
ke
rb
ur
g.
I
t
is
ab
ou
t
wh
et
he
r
an
Am
er
ica
n
c
ou
rt
c
an
is
su
e
a
pr
io
r
r
es
tr
ai
nt
a
ga
in
st
a
pe
rs
on
's
c
on
ve
y-
n
g
a
ny
i
nf
or
ma
ti
on
a
bo
ut
a
not
he
r
p
er
so
n.
An
d
t
ha
t
is
t
he
r
em
ed
y
th
at
t
he
F
ir
st
Am
en
dm
en
t
mo
st
c
le
ar
ly
fo
rb
id
s.
5
-
8/20/2019 g Joni Filed
11/20
II
. Res
tr
ic
tin
g
sp
eec
h
ab
out
a
n
ex
-
l
ov
er
's
li
fe
u
nc
on
sti
tu
ti
ona
ll
y r
es
tr
ict
s
pe
op
le
's
a
bi
li
ty
to
s
pea
k
ab
ou
t t
he
ir
o
wn
li
ve
s
R
es
tri
ct
in
g
Gj
on
i's
s
pe
ech
abo
ut
V
an
Val
ke
rb
urg
al
so
un
co
nst
it
ut
ion
al
ly
r
es
tri
ct
s
Gjo
ni
's
sp
ee
ch
a
bout him-
s
el
f an
d
hi
s
o
wn.
l
ife
.
Th
e
in
ju
nct
io
n,
fa
r in
st
anc
e,
l
im
it
s
G
jo
ni
's
ab
ili
ty
to
pu
bl
ic
ly
d
is
cus
s
th
is
li
ti
-
g
ati
on
o
r the
in
ju
nc
tio
n
i
tse
lf
.
Gj
on
c
an
no
t di
sc
uss
h
is
c
ase
wit
ho
ut
.i
nc
lu
din
g
s
om
e
inf
or
ma
tio
n
a
bo
ut
V
an
Va
lk
erb
ur
g,
i
ncl
ud
in
g
abo
ut
he
r
pe
rso
na
l li
fe
--
su
ch
a
s
her
n
am
e,
t
hei
r
pa
st rom
an
ti
c
re
la
ti
ons
hi
p,
an
d th
e
fac
t
tha
t s
he
so
ugh
t
an
i
nj
un
ct
ion
a
ga
ins
t
i
m
Li
ke
wi
se,
wh
en
.p
eop
le
can
de
mn
Gj
on
o
nli
ne
fo
r
a
l-
l
eg
edl
y
ac
ti
ng
bad
ly
b
y
w
rit
in
g
ab
out
V
an
V
al
ke
rbu
rg
;
.the injunction limits
Gjozzi
from explaining
why
h
e
th
ou
gh
t hz
s
s
ta
tem
en
ts
w
ere
fa
ir
a
nd
j
us
ti
fie
d.
An
d
if
G
jon
i
wa
nt
s t
o
t
el
l
h
is
f
ri
end
s
an
d a
cq
ua
int
an
ce
s,
in
an
on
li
ne
jo
ur
na
l
o
r
on
h
is
F
ac
eb
ook
p
ag
e,
ho
w
he
fe
el
s
ab
ou
t
ro
ma
nti
c r
el
at
ion
sh
ip
s o
r
w
hy
h
e
i
s
ca
u-
ti
ou
s
ab
ou
t
a n
ew
r
ela
ti
ons
hi
p,,
he
ca
nno
t
do
so
i
f
t
he
exp
la
na
tio
n
wo
uld
m
en
ti
on
Va
n
Va
lke
rb
ur
g.
C
our
ts
h
av
e
re
cog
ni
ze
d
tha
t
ev
en
i
mpo
si
ng
t
ort
li
a-
b
il
it
y for
spe
ec
h
ab
ou
t
t
he
sp
ea
ker
's
re
la
ti
ons
hi
p
wit
h
s
om
eo
ne
e
ls
e w
ou
ld
i
mpr
op
er
ly
r
es
tri
ct
th
e
sp
eak
-
~
-
8/20/2019 g Joni Filed
12/20
e
r'
s
a
bi
l
it
y
t
o
de
s
cr
i
be
h
i
s
o
r
h
er
o
wn
l
if
e
.
F
or
i
n
-
s
t
an
ce
,
in
B
on
o
me
v
.
K
ay
s
en
,
1
7
Ma
s
s.
L.
R
pt
r.
69
5
,
20
0
4
WL
11
94
7
31
(M
as
s
.
S
up
e
r.
C
t
.
2
0
04
),
a
ut
ho
r
S
us
an
a
K
ay
s
en
wr
o
te
a
bo
o
k a
bo
u
t
h
e
r
o
wn
li
f
e,
i
nc
l
ud
ing her
r
e
la
t
io
ns
h
ip
w
it
h
J
os
e
ph
B
o
no
m
e.
T
he
bo
ok
i
n
cl
u
de
d
m
an
y
de
ta
i
ls
,
in
c
lu
d
in
g
i
n
ti
ma
te
s
e
xu
a
l
d
et
a
il
s
,
a
nd
t
ho
u
gh
it
di
d
n
o
t
me
n
ti
o
n.
Bo
n
om
e'
s
na
m
e,
pe
o
pl
e
wh
o
kn
ew
a
bo
u
t
hi
s
re
l
at
i
on
s
hi
p
w
it
h
a
y
se
ri
r
ec
o
gn
iz
e
d
h
i
m.
B
o
no
m
e
s
u
ed
fo
r
d
i
sc
lo
s
ur
e
o
f
p
ri
va
t
e
fa
c
ts
,
b
ut
t
he
c
o
ur
t
r
ej
ec
t
ed
t
ha
t
ar
g
um
e
nt
.
Th
e
co
u
rt
f
ou
nd
t
ha
t
e
ve
n.
a
pe
r
so
n
al
l
i
fe
s
t
or
y
c
a
n
b
e
s
ee
n
a
s
in
v
ol
v
in
g
i
s
su
e
s
o
f
l
e
gi
t
im
a
te
p
u
bl
i
c
c
o
nc
e
rn
,
i
d.
a
t
*
5
,
si
m
pl
y
b
e
ca
u
se
it
d
i
sc
us
s
es
br
o
ad
e
r
ma
t
te
r
s
su
c
h
a
s
relationships
between the
sexes.
Likewise, any
fut
u
re
p
o
st
s
b
y
M
r.
G
j
on
i
th
a
t
m
e
nt
i
on
M
s.
V
an
V
al
k
er
b
ur
g
in
th
e
co
u
rs
e
o
f di
sc
u
ss
i
ng
th
e
i
nj
u
nc
t
io
n
i
n
th
i
s
c
as
e,
M
r
.
G
j
on
i'
s
t
ho
u
gh
t
s
a
bo
ut
t
he
c
o
mp
u
te
r
ga
m
in
g
b
u
si
-
ne
s
s,
o
r
r
el
a
ti
o
ns
h
ip
s
b
et
we
e
n
th
e
s
e
xe
s
w
o
ul
d
s
i
mi
-
la
r
ly
in
vo
l
ve
i
s
su
es
o
f
l
eg
i
ti
m
at
e
p
u
bl
i
c
c
o
nc
e
rn
.
A
nd
,
b
ec
a
us
e
i
t
i
s
of
te
n
d
i
ff
i
cu
l
t,
i
f
n
ot
i
mp
o
ss
i
-
b
l
e;
t
o
s
e
pa
r
at
e
on
e
's
i
n
ti
m
at
e
a
nd
pe
rs
o
na
l
e
xp
e
ri
-
en
c
es
f
ro
m
t
he
p
e
op
l
e
wi
t
h
wh
o
m
th
o
se
ex
p
er
ie
n
ce
s
a
re
s
h
ar
e
d,
t
he
c
o
ur
t
in
Bo
n
om
e
h
e
ld
t
h
at
t
he
Fi
r
st
7
-
8/20/2019 g Joni Filed
13/20
A
me
n
dm
e
nt
.
pr
o
te
c
ts
K
a
ys
e
n'
s
ab
i
li
t
y
t
o d
is
c
us
s
h
e
r
li
f
e,
e
ve
n
t
ho
u
gh
di
s
cl
o
si
n
g Bo
n
om
e
's
in
v
ol
v
em
en
t
i
n
t
ho
se
e
xp
e
ri
e
nc
e
s i
s
a
n
e
ce
s
sa
ry
i
n
ci
de
n
t
th
er
e
to
.
I
d.
a
t
*
6.
O
t
he
r
re
c
en
t
c
a
se
s
, su
c
h
as
A
n
on
s
en
v. Do-
n
a
hu
e
,
8
5
7
S
.W
.2
d
7
00
.
(
Te
x
.
C
t
.
A
pp
.
2
00
3
),
t
a
ke
t
he
,
sa
m
e
v
ie
w.
S
e
e
a
l
so
So
n
ja
R
.
W
e
st
,
T
he
S
to
r
y of
M
e
:
T
he
U
n
de
rp
r
ot
e
ct
i
on
o
f
A
ut
o
bi
og
r
ap
h
ic
a
l
S
pe
e
ch
,
8
4
W
as
h
. U
.
L.
Re
v
.
90
5
,
90
7-
11
(2
0
06
)
(
e
xp
l
ai
ni
n
g h
ow
au
t
ob
io
g
ra
p
hi
c
al
s
pe
e
ch
m
u
st
o
ft
e
n
a
ls
o
me
n
ti
o
n
o
th
-
e
r
s)
F
o
r
t
he
r
e
as
on
s
m
e
nt
io
n
ed
i
n
Pa
r
t I
,
i
mp
o
si
n
g
a
p
r
i-
or
re
s
tr
a
in
t
o
n
s
uc
h
s
p
ee
c
h wo
u
ld
be
im
p
ro
p
er
a
s
w
el
l.
A
nd
th
a
t
i
s
e
sp
e
ci
a
ll
y
so
wh
e
n
t
h
e
p
r
io
r
re
s
tr
a
in
t
c
o-
v
i
rs
n
o
t
ju
s
t
t
he
n
ar
r
ow
c
at
e
go
r
y of
s
pe
e
ch
t
h
at
fi
ts
within the disclosure of
private facts
tort, but i
n
-
s
te
a
d
c
ov
e
rs
a
ny
i
nf
o
rm
a
ti
o
n
a
b
ou
t
th
e
[
pl
a
in
t
if
f
]
o
r
h
e
r
p
er
s
on
al
l
if
e
.
No
r
d
oe
s
i
t
ma
tt
e
r
t
ha
t
pl
a
in
t
if
f
m
a
y
n
o
t
b
e
a
g
e
n-
er
a
l-
p
ur
p
os
e
p
u
bl
i
c
f
i
gu
r
e
fo
r
li
b
el
l
aw
p
u
rp
o
se
s.
Tr
u
e
s
ta
te
m
en
t
s;
an
d
ex
pr
e
ss
i
on
s
o
f
o
pi
n
io
n
ab
o
ut
p
eo
-
p
l
e,
a
r
e
fu
l
ly
p
ro
t
ec
t
ed
re
g
ar
d
le
s
s
o
f
wh
et
h
er
th
e
s
u
bj
e
ct
s
a
r
e p
ri
v
at
e
fi
g
ur
e
s.
E
ve
n
in
in
t
en
t
io
n
al
i
n-
f
l
ic
t
io
n
o
f
e
mo
ti
o
na
l
d
i
st
r
es
s
c
as
e
s,
th
e
F
ir
s
t
A
me
n
d-
m
en
t
ap
p
li
e
s
t
o sp
e
ec
h
r
e
la
te
d
t
o pr
i
va
t
e
f
ig
u
re
s
as
-
8/20/2019 g Joni Filed
14/20
m
uc
h as
to
sp
ee
ch
re
la
te
d
to
pu
bl
ic
fi
gu
re
s.
S
ee
Sn
yd
er
v.
P
he
lp
s,
56
2
U.
S.
44
3,
45
1,
4
58
(2
01
1)
(ap
-
:
pl
yin
g
th
e
r
ea
son
in
g o
f
Hus
tl
er
M
ag
az
in
e,
In
c.
v
.
Fa
l-
we
ll
,
4
85
U.
S.
4
6
(1
98
8)
,
wh
ic
h
in
vo
lve
d
a
p
ub
li
c
fi
g-
ur
e p
la
in
ti
ff
,
to
a
c
as
e
w
he
re
t
he
p
la
in
ti
ff
an
d
t
he
s
ub
je
ct
o
f
th
e
s
pe
ec
h
we
re
b
ot
h
pr
iv
at
e
fi
gu
res
).
Li
ke
wi
se
,
th
e
lo
si
ng
p
lai
nt
if
fs
in
.
B
on
om
e a
nd
A
no
n-
se
n we
re
pr
iv
at
e
f
ig
ur
es
,
t
oo
.
So
w
as
t
he
lo
si
ng
.
p
la
in
ti
ff
i
n
Ke
ef
e,
a
nd
th
e
s
ub
je
ct
s
of
t
he
sp
ee
ch
i
n
Cl
ai
bor
ne
Ha
rd
wa
re
.
T
he
U
.S
.
Su
pr
em
e
C
our
t
ha
s
re
co
g-
ni
ze
d
a p
la
in
ti
ff'
s p
ri
va
te
f
ig
ur
e s
ta
tu
s
a
s
r
el
ev
an
t
in
o
nl
y
on
e
are
a:
w
he
th
er
co
mpe
ns
at
or
y
d
am
ag
es
in
l
i-
b
el
c
as
es
ca
n
be
ba
se
d
on
a
sh
ow
in
g
of
me
re
n
egl
i-
B
en
ce
,
ra
th
er
t
ha
n
ac
tu
al
m
al
ic
e.
S
ee
G
er
tz
v.
R
ob
-
ert
Welch,
Inc.,
418 U.S. 323,
344
-50
(1974). That
st
at
us
i
s
.n
ot
re
le
va
nt
to
at
te
mpt
s
to
su
pp
re
ss
n
on-
li
be
lo
us
s
pe
ec
h
ab
ou
t
t
he
pe
rs
on
,
in
cl
ud
in
g
tr
ut
hfu
l
st
at
em
en
ts
a
nd
e
xpr
es
si
on
s
o
f
op
in
io
n.
IZ
I.
A
ll
ow
in
g
su
ch
b
ro
ad
in
ju
nc
ti
on
s w
ou
ld
op
en
t
he
do
or
t
o
su
pp
re
ss
in
g
a b
ro
ad
r
ang
e
of
s
pe
ec
h
Any
order
affir
mi
ng
t
he
t
ri
al
co
ur
t
d
ec
is
io
n
in
t
hi
s
ca
se
wo
ul
d
al
so
af
fe
ct
m
an
y
ca
se
s
be
yo
nd
th
is
on
e,
an
d
ma
ny
ca
se
s be
yo
nd
th
os
e
ar
is
in
g
f
ro
m
di
spu
te
s
am
on
g
ex
-
l
ov
er
s.
-
8/20/2019 g Joni Filed
15/20
Th
e
t
ri
al
c
ou
rt
de
ci
si
on
in
th
is
ca
se
i
s
an
i
ns
ta
nc
e
of
a
b
ro
ad
er
pr
ob
le
m.
I
n
re
ce
nt
ye
ar
s,
so
me
tr
ia
l
co
ur
ts
th
ro
ug
ho
ut
t
he
c
ou
nt
ry
-
-
i
nc
lud
in
g
i
n
Ma
ss
-
a
ch
use
tt
s
--
h
ave
e
nt
er
ed
s
tr
ik
in
gl
y
br
oa
d i
nj
un
ct
io
ns
th
at
b
ar
a
w
id
e ra
ng
e
of
s
pe
ec
h ab
ou
t
p
ar
ti
cu
la
r
p
eo-
pl
e.
T
he
se
in
ju
nc
ti
on
s,
li
ke
th
e
o
ne
in
t
hi
s
ca
se
,
ar
e
n
ot
l
im
it
ed
to
un
pr
ot
ec
ted
s
pe
ech
,
s
uc
h
a
s
pro
ve
n
l
i-
b
el
,
f
ig
ht
in
g.
wo
rd
s,
t
hr
ea
ts
,
or
sp
eec
h i
nt
en
de
d
t
o
a
nd
l
ik
el
y
t
o in
ci
te
i
mm
in
ent
i
ll
eg
al
c
on
du
ct
.
No
r
ar
e
t
he
y
l
im
it
ed
to
un
wan
te
d s
pe
ec
h
t
o
a
pe
rs
on
.
Ra
th
er
,
th
ey
re
st
ri
ct
a w
id
e
ra
ng
e of
s
pe
ec
h
t
o
th
e
pu
bl
ic
a
bo
ut
th
e
pe
rs
on
.
Th
us
.
fo
r
in
st
an
ce
,
in
Cha
n
v.
El
li
s,
77
0
S.
E.
2d
85
1
(
Ga
.
2
01
5)
,
t
he
G
eo
rg
ia
S
up
re
me
C
ou
rt
r
ev
er
se
d
a
n
i
n-
junction
that
ordered
a
web site operator,
Matthew
Ch
an
,
t
o
de
le
te
al
l p
os
ts
re
la
ti
ng
t
o
[
Li
nd
a)
El
li
s
f
ro
m
h
is
w
eb
s
it
e,
a
nd
l
ik
el
y
for
ba
de
th
e po
st
in
g
o
f
f
ut
ur
e p
os
ts
a
s we
ll
.
T
he
G
eo
rg
ia
Su
pr
em
e
Co
ur
t
c
on
-
e
lu
de
d
th
at
th
e
in
ju
nc
tio
n
wa
s
n
ot
au
th
or
iz
ed
b
y
Ge
or
-
g
a
w,
la
rg
el
y
b
ec
au
se
th
e
i
nj
un
ct
io
n
co
ve
re
d
sp
ee
ch
a
bo
ut
a
pe
rs
on
an
d
n
ot
ju
st
sp
ee
ch
to
her
_.
T
he
c
ou
rt
't
he
re
fo
re
d
id
n
ot
n
ee
d
t
o
r
ea
ch
th
e
se
rio
us
F
ir
st
A
me
nd
me
nt
o
bj
ec
ti
on
s
to
th
e
in
ju
nc
ti
on.
1
0
-
8/20/2019 g Joni Filed
16/20
Likewise,
in
Kleem v.
Hamrick,
a
local
gadfly and
past
local
candidate,
blogged
offensive
things
about
the
sister
of
a
town's
mayor, who was
also
a
local
civic
figure.
An
Ohio
Court of
Common
Pleas
judge
re-
sponged
by
ordering
that
the
blogger
is
prohibited
from
posting any
information
/comments
/threats
/or
any
.other
data
on any
Internet
site;
regarding
the
pet -
ver
and
any
member of
her
immediate
or
extended
family
on
:any
site,
including
both
her own
blog_
i and
the
Cleveland.com
news
site.3
In
Kimberlin
v.
Walker, a
Maryland
court
similarly
enjoined
a
blogger
from
bloggng
about a
political
ac-
twist
who was
also
a
convicted
criminal.4
That
order,
too,
was
later
vacated
--
though
not
for. a
month a
half, time
during
which the blogger's
Mist
Amendment
3
Order of
Protection at 3,
Kleem
v.
Hamrick, No.
CV
11
761954
(Ohio
Ct. Cam:.
Pl.
Aug.
15,
2011), http:/
/www:
volokh.com
/wp-
content,~uploads
/2012/07/
KleemvHamrickOrder.
paf.
The
order
was
modified
a
week
lat-
er,
allowing
speech
about members
of
the
petztioner's
~ ~ e ~
tended
fami_ly,
but
not
about the
petitioner
herself. Jour-
nal
Fntry,
Kleem,
No.
CV
11
761954, hLtp:
/
/www.volokh.com/
wp-
content
/uploads/
2012
/Q7
KleemvHamrickOrder.pdf, at
5.
~ Final
Peace
Order,
Kimberlin
v.
Walker,.
No.
0601SP019792012
{Md.
Montgomery County Dist. Ct. May 19,
201.2 ,
http://
www.
law.ucla.edu
/volokh
/crimharass/
AaronWorthing-
order.jpg;
Hearing at 59
-60,
Kimberlin,
No.
0601SP019792012 (Md.
Montgomery
County
Dist.
Ct.
May
.29,
2012)
(
Respondent
shall
not
contact
the
person in
person,
by
telephone,
in
writing,
or any
other means.
And `any
other means'
is
putting
it on a blog,
a
Tweet, a
megaphone,
a
smoke
signals --
what
else
is out
there --
sonar,
radar,
laser.
Nothing ....
).
11
-
8/20/2019 g Joni Filed
17/20
ri
gh
ts
we
re
su
pp
res
se
d.5
A
nd
in
Ni
lan
v.
V
ale
nt
i,
a
Mas
sa
ch
use
tt
s
co
ur
t o
rd
er
ed
a bl
og
ge
r
(
and
f
or
mer
pr
o-
f
es
sio
na
l
jou
rn
al
ist
)
to
re
mo
ve
h
is
bl
og
p
ost
s
ab
ou
t
a
w
oma
n -
-
a
s
it
ha
ppe
ns
,
a
l
oc
al
jud
ge
's
d
aug
ht
er
-
-
w
ho
ha
d
b
een
ac
cus
ed
of
cr
im
ina
l
n
eg
li
gen
ce
an
d l
ea
v-
in
g
th
e
sc
en
e
of
an
ac
ci
de
nt
af
ter
hi
tt
in
g a
ped
es
tr
i-
an
wi
th
h
er
c
ar.
6 Ag
ain
,
th
at
or
de
r
w
as
l
at
er
va
cat
ed
.?
Tri
al
co
ur
ts
i
n ot
her
sta
te
s
h
av
e
l
ik
ewi
se
e
nj
oi
ned
pe
opl
e fr
om
s
ay
in
g
a
nyt
hi
ng
a
t
a
ll
on
lin
e
ab
ou
t
ex
-
l
ove
rs
8
o
r
e
x-
.s
pou
se
s
la
wye
rs
.9
C
ou
rt
s
hav
e
e
njo
in
ed
5
Or
de
r of
De
ni
al
o
f
Pe
ti
tio
n fo
r
P
eac
e
Or
de
r,
K
imb
er
lin
v
.
Wa
lk
er,
No.
852
6D
(Md
.
Mon
tg
ome
ry
Co
un
ty
Ci
r.
Ct
. J
uly
5
,
20
12
),
ht
tp
://
w
ww.law
.u
cla
_e
du
/v
olo
kh
/cr
im
har
as
s/
99
24
634
9-
Pe
ace
Or
der
Va
cat
ed
7
-5
-12
.p
df.
6
H
ara
ss
men
t P
re
ven
tio
n
Or
de
r, Ni
la
n
v.
V
al
ent
i,
N
o.
12
2
7R0
2
35
(
Mas
s.
P
it
tsf
ie
ld
D
is
t.
Ct.
Jun
e
27,
2
01
2),
h
tt
p:/
/w
ww.
vo
lok
h
.
c
om
/
wp-
c
on
ten
t/
upl
oa
ds
/2
012
/0
7/
n
il
ano
rder.png; Andrew Amelinckx, Judge Gives Nilan Harass-
me
nt
Pr
ote
ct
ion
f
ro
m V
ale
nt
i,
O
rd
ers
H
im
to
Re
da
ct
Bl
og
,
B
er
ksh
ir
e E
agl
e,
Jun
e 27
,
20
12
.
Mod
if
ica
ti
on,
E
xte
ns
ion
o
r
Ter
min
at
ion
of
Ha
ra
ssm
en
t
P
re
ven
ti
on
Ord
er
,
Nil
.an
v.
Val
en
ti,
N
o.
1
2
27
R0
2
35 (
Ma
ss.
Pi
tts
fi
eld
Di
st.
C
t.
Ju
ly
9,
20
12)
,
w
ww
.la
w.u
cl
a.e
du
/
vo
lo
kh/
cr
imh
ar
ass
/
Nil
an
Ord
er
Ter
mi
nat
io
n.p
df.
M
or
ell
i
v
.
M
or
ell
i,
No
. A
06
-04
-6
07
50
-C
,
at
9
(
Pa.
Ct
.
Co
m.
P1
. Jun
e
6,
2
011
),
h
ttp
:
/ww
w.
law
.u
cla
.ed
u/
vol
ok
h/
c
rim
ha
ras
s
/
Mor
el
liT
ran
sc
rip
t.
pdf
(
Fa
the
r
s
hal
l
tak
e
do
wn
t
ha
t we
bs
ite
a
nd
s
ha
ll n
ev
er
o
n a
ny
p
ub
lic
me
di
a m
ak
e
a
ny
r
efe
re
nce
to
m
oth
er at
all
, n
or
an
y
re
fer
en
ce
t
o
th
e
re
la-
tionship
between
mother
anal
children, nor shall
he
make any
r
efe
re
nce
�