g02. construction of 3dep in the coastal zone as the

34
Authors: Jeffrey J. Danielson, John C. Brock, Gayla A. Evans, and Dean J. Tyler G02. Construction of 3DEP in the Coastal Zone as the Coastal Component of the 3D Elevation Program Coastal GeoTools 2015

Upload: others

Post on 17-Apr-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: G02. Construction of 3DEP in the Coastal Zone as the

Authors: Jeffrey J. Danielson, John C. Brock, Gayla A. Evans, and Dean J. Tyler

G02. Construction of 3DEP in the Coastal Zone

as the Coastal Component of the 3D Elevation

Program

Coastal GeoTools 2015

Page 2: G02. Construction of 3DEP in the Coastal Zone as the

Topobathymetric Elevation Models

Many applications of geospatial data in coastal environments require detailed

knowledge of near-shore topography and bathymetry as physical processes in

the coastal environments are controlled by the geomorphology of both “over-

the-land” topography and “underwater” bathymetry.

Topobathymetric models provide a required seamless elevation product for

several science application studies such as shoreline delineation, coastal

inundation mapping, sediment-transport, sea level rise, storm surge models,

tsunami impact assessment, and also to analyze the impact of various climate

change scenarios on coastal regions.

The Coastal National Elevation Database (CoNED) Applications Project is

integrating many disparate lidar and bathymetric data sources into a common

seamless database aligned both vertically and horizontally to a common

reference system to construct 3DEP in the Coastal Zone topobathymetric

models.

Page 3: G02. Construction of 3DEP in the Coastal Zone as the

Topobathymetric Elevation Models (Con’t)

This multi-temporal, multi-scale, and multi-resolution database permits an easy

portability to geomorphological and hazard vulnerability applications but at the

same time extends the framework of the 3DEP Bare-Earth Digital Elevation

Models (DEMs) offshore into the intertidal, submarine estuarine and littoral

zones.

Strengths of the coastal elevation database are its multi-temporal / multi-scale

capability for assessing geomorphic change detection, the maintaining of

critical topographic features such as, levees and embankments and finally the

accurate mapping of shoreline and wetland elevations.

Page 4: G02. Construction of 3DEP in the Coastal Zone as the

Topobathymetric Elevation Models

Topobathymetric elevation models are a merged rendering of both

topography (land elevation) and bathymetry (water depth) to provide a

seamless elevation product

Data sources

Light Detection and Ranging (Lidar) Airborne (NIR-1064nm)

Terrestrial Ground-Based (NIR-1064nm)

Topobathymetric (EAARL-B and CZMIL)

(Green-532nm)

Bathymetric Sonar (Acoustic) Multi-Beam

Single-Beam

Swath

Hydrographic Surveys

terrestrial marine intertidal

Page 5: G02. Construction of 3DEP in the Coastal Zone as the

3DEP in the Coastal Zone

• 39% of the nation’s total

population lives in

coastal shoreline

counties (NOAA).

• Coastal areas are highly

dynamic: shoreline

erosion, rapid wetland

loss, hurricane impacts,

and sea-level rise.

• Rapid urban

development and

population growth in the

coastal zone=

increasing human

vulnerability to natural

hazards.

Page 6: G02. Construction of 3DEP in the Coastal Zone as the

3DEP in the Coastal Zone

Focus Regions (Current Status)

Sandy

Region

Coastal Change and Hazard Applications: Earthquake Tsunamis Storm Surge

Sea Level Rise Wetland Loss Cliff Erosion

Habitat Quality Coral Bleaching Ocean Acidification

Water Quality

San Francisco Bay

Northern Gulf of Mexico

An Elevation Data Foundation for Understanding

Coastal Vulnerability and Change Pacific

Northwest

Pilot

Pacific Islands Pilot

Alaska

North Slope

Marshal

l Islands

Hawaiian

Islands

NJ/DE

Page 7: G02. Construction of 3DEP in the Coastal Zone as the

3DEP in the Coastal Zone

Topobathymetric Elevation Models - Specifications

Definition: Extends from the open coast to the landward boundary of coastal watersheds (USGS Watershed Boundaries Dataset) Includes inland bathymetry where available

Spatial Specifications:

Projection / Coordinate System: Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) and Geographic

Horizontal datum: NAD83 (2011)

Vertical datum: NAVD88 (Geoid12A)

Cell sizes: 3 Meter, 2 Meter, and 1 Meter

Accuracy Specifications:

Lidar: Quality Level 2 (QL2) - 2 points per sq. meter – 10cm RMSE

Spatial Organization– Consistent gridding/interpolation, resampling, and cell alignment

Multi-temporal – Repeat Lidar Acquisitions over Site-Specific Coastal areas

Updating – Spatially Referenced Metadata

Page 8: G02. Construction of 3DEP in the Coastal Zone as the

Elevation Reference Systems

Page 9: G02. Construction of 3DEP in the Coastal Zone as the

Topobathymetric Model Development Workflow

Page 10: G02. Construction of 3DEP in the Coastal Zone as the

Topobathymetric Model Development Workflow

Page 11: G02. Construction of 3DEP in the Coastal Zone as the

Topobathymetric Model Development Workflow

Page 12: G02. Construction of 3DEP in the Coastal Zone as the

Topobathymetric Model Development Workflow

Page 13: G02. Construction of 3DEP in the Coastal Zone as the

• Removing elevations from the tops of selected drainage

structures (bridges and culverts) in a lidar-derived DEM

to depict the terrain under those structures so that

channels flow down slope

(Poppenga 2010, 2012, 2013, 2014)

Hydrologically-Enforced (Hydro-Enforced)

Page 14: G02. Construction of 3DEP in the Coastal Zone as the

• Objective: The minimum convex hull boundary

is a mask created from the classified ground

lidar points that extracts the perimeter of the

exterior lidar points.

• Basic Processing Steps:

• Extract ground class from classified point cloud

• Generate a LAS Dataset (lidar files container) and

compute the average point spacing from point cloud

• Construct a raster whose cell values reflect the “Point

Count” spatial distribution from the LAS lidar files

referenced by a LAS dataset

• Fill small interior holes and shrink the data extent to

the exterior lidar points, convert raster extent to

polyline with assigned elevation heights

ARRA Region 1- 2011 Lidar Dataset (Overview)

Topographic Lidar (NIR-1064nm

ARRA Region 1- 2011 Lidar Dataset (Zoom)

Topographic Lidar (NIR-1064nm)

Land / Water Masking (MCHB) Minimum Convex Hull (Variable Elevation Datum)

Page 15: G02. Construction of 3DEP in the Coastal Zone as the

Minimum Convex Hull – New Jersey Wetlands

Page 16: G02. Construction of 3DEP in the Coastal Zone as the

Point Return Density – All Classes

Page 17: G02. Construction of 3DEP in the Coastal Zone as the

Point Return Density Thresholding

Page 18: G02. Construction of 3DEP in the Coastal Zone as the

3DEP in the Coastal Zone (Hurricane Sandy)

Page 19: G02. Construction of 3DEP in the Coastal Zone as the

3DEP in the Coastal Zone (Hurricane Sandy)

Pre-Sandy Lidar Status

Page 20: G02. Construction of 3DEP in the Coastal Zone as the

3DEP in the Coastal Zone (Hurricane Sandy)

Post-Sandy Lidar Status

Page 21: G02. Construction of 3DEP in the Coastal Zone as the

3DEP in the Coastal Zone (Hurricane Sandy) EAARL-B Bathymetry (Barnegat Bay)

Page 22: G02. Construction of 3DEP in the Coastal Zone as the

Delaware River

3DEP in the Coastal Zone (Hurricane Sandy)

EAARL-B – Delaware River Basin (Inland Bathymetry)

Page 23: G02. Construction of 3DEP in the Coastal Zone as the

3DEP in the Coastal Zone (New Jersey / Delaware)

Integrated Topobathymetric Elevation Model (2014)

Page 24: G02. Construction of 3DEP in the Coastal Zone as the

3DEP in the Coastal Zone (New Jersey / Delaware)

1-Meter Integrated Topobathymetric Model Metadata

Page 25: G02. Construction of 3DEP in the Coastal Zone as the

3DEP in the Coastal Zone (New Jersey / Delaware)

NJDE Validation – Absolute Vertical Accuracy

Page 26: G02. Construction of 3DEP in the Coastal Zone as the

3DEP in the Coastal Zone (New Jersey / Delaware)

NJDE Validation – Absolute Vertical Accuracy (Overall)

n

szsZn

i

ii

2

1

)]()(ˆ[

Min. Diff -4.499 Meters

Max. Diff 1.543 Meters

Mean Diff -0.105 Meters

Std. Dev. Diff 0.582 Meters

RMSE 0.591 Meters

Page 27: G02. Construction of 3DEP in the Coastal Zone as the

3DEP in the Coastal Zone

GPS Control for Validation of Topobathymetric Models

Avalon, NJ Island Beach State Park,

Seaside Park, NJ

Sandy Hook, NJ

Page 28: G02. Construction of 3DEP in the Coastal Zone as the

3DEP in the Coastal Zone (New Jersey / Delaware)

NJDE Validation – Abs. Vertical Acc. (Coastal Sources)

n

szsZn

i

ii

2

1

)]()(ˆ[

Sources Min.. Diff Max. Diff Mean Diff Std. Dev. Diff RMSE

2011 Lidar -1.152 0.155 0.102 0.099 0.142

2010 Lidar -1.318 0.258 -0.855 0.603 1.046

2009 Lidar -1.461 0.076 -0.843 0.604 1.036

RMSE

Page 29: G02. Construction of 3DEP in the Coastal Zone as the

3DEP in the Coastal Zone (New Jersey / Delaware)

NJDE Validation – Abs. Vertical Acc. (Staten Island)

Page 30: G02. Construction of 3DEP in the Coastal Zone as the

3DEP in the Coastal Zone (New Jersey / Delaware)

NJDE Validation – Abs. Vertical Acc. (Staten Island)

n

szsZn

i

ii

2

1

)]()(ˆ[

Min. Diff -2.830 Meters

Max. Diff 0.924 Meters

Mean Diff -0.063 Meters

Std. Dev. Diff 0.307 Meters

RMSE 0.313 Meters

Page 31: G02. Construction of 3DEP in the Coastal Zone as the

Classified Lidar Datasets (Processed): USGS_NC_1996

USGS_NC_1997

NGS_NC_VA_Coast_Mar_2008

USACE_Currituck_Dare_Hyde_Counties_NC_Aug_2009

USGS_Cape_Hatteras_NC_Nov_2009

USGS_N_Outer_Banks_NC_Nov_2009

USGS_Dare_Hyde_Counties_NC_Dec_2009

USACE_NC_Coast_Jun_2010

USACE_VA_Coast_July_2010

NGS_Carteret_Dare_Counties_NC_Aug_2011_Post_Irene

USGS_NC_Coast_Nov_2012_Post_Sandy

USACE_VA_Coast_Nov_2012_Post_Sandy

Unclassified Datasets (Unprocessed): USGS_NC_1998

USGS_NC_1999

USGS_SC_NC_VA_1999_Post_Dennis

USGS_SC_NC_VA_1999_Post_Floyd

USGS_NC_Summer_2000

NC_Floodplain_Mapping_Program_NC_Mar_2001

USACE_NC_Coast_Jul_2004

USACE_NC_Coast_Sep_2005

• 20 Source Lidar Datasets

• 12 classified, processed

and gridded.

• 8 unprocessed (require

bare earth processing –

LP360)

• Project temporal range

1996 – 2013.

• Additional, more recent

datasets coming soon.

NC Outer Banks: Multi-Temporal Topobathy

Page 32: G02. Construction of 3DEP in the Coastal Zone as the

• Spatial overlap of the 20

Lidar source datasets.

• Overlap range: 1 – 15

(temporal iterations).

• Average overlap for Outer

Banks, NC: 10

• Higher temporal density (10

– 15) on Atlantic shoreline.

• Geomorphology dynamics

will be highly visible for the

Outer Banks, NC with the

wide range of temporal data

availability.

• Natural change

• Human driven change

• Disturbance driven change

NC Outer Banks: Multi-Temporal Topobathy

Page 33: G02. Construction of 3DEP in the Coastal Zone as the

1. Aug, 2009

2. Nov, 2009

3. Aug, 2011

4. Nov, 2012

NC Outer Banks: Multi-Temporal Topobathy

Page 34: G02. Construction of 3DEP in the Coastal Zone as the

Questions