general electric ver 2 16-6-05 gerpisa

Upload: adam-leaver

Post on 08-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/6/2019 General Electric Ver 2 16-6-05 Gerpisa

    1/16

    General Electric

    The conditions of success

  • 8/6/2019 General Electric Ver 2 16-6-05 Gerpisa

    2/16

    Aims and method

    Aim: use our narrative and numbers approach toprovide a revisionist account of:

    a.Jack Welch as star CEO

    b.GE as brilliant success story withtransferable lessons for others

    Method:

    Narrative: frames understandings of the causes ofsuccess

    Numbers: enable us to deconstruct thatrepresentation

  • 8/6/2019 General Electric Ver 2 16-6-05 Gerpisa

    3/16

    Structure

    1. Company narrative: not a conglomerate

    2. Business School explanations: managementinitiatives

    3. Using the numbers: a tale of two businesses4. GE: the undisclosed business model

    5. Conclusion: the limits of the GE way

  • 8/6/2019 General Electric Ver 2 16-6-05 Gerpisa

    4/16

    Not a conglomerate

    GE is a large industrial and commercial

    conglomerate

    resulting problem because the market prefers

    pure plays

    Welchs response

    a. Narrative defence; GE is not a conglomerate

    because the businesses are inter-relatedb. Performative initiatives: widely identified as

    the root of GEs success

  • 8/6/2019 General Electric Ver 2 16-6-05 Gerpisa

    5/16

    GE Business Segment Sales revenues ($ mill) Earnings1($ mill)

    GE INDUSTRIAL

    Aircraft Engines 11,141 2,060Consumer Products 8,456 495Industrial Products and Systems 9,755 999Materials 7,651 1,125

    NBC 7,149 1,6

    Power Systems 22,926 6,255Technical Products and Services 9,266 1,562

    GE CAPITAL SERVICESCommercial Finance 16,040 3,185Consumer Finance 10,266 1,930

    Equipment Management 4,254 311Insurance 23,296 (509)All Other GE Capital Services 4,331 (291)

    GE CONSOLIDATED2

    131,698 14,118

  • 8/6/2019 General Electric Ver 2 16-6-05 Gerpisa

    6/16

    Jack Welchs initiatives

    Q. the last year or two at GE have been soexcellent. Every year GE gets better andbetter. How do you account for that?

    A. You have to take the initiatives and you haveto understand theyve all become broader anddeeper(Jack Welch)

    Initiative 1: number1 or number 2

    Initiative 2: integrated diversityInitiative 3: Work Out

    Initiative 4: Six Sigma

    Initiative 5: e-commerce

  • 8/6/2019 General Electric Ver 2 16-6-05 Gerpisa

    7/16

    Business School explanations

    Uncritically reproduced what Jack said and did

    Endless obsession with Jacksbackground/psychology

    Represents co-authorship of the Jack Welch/GEline that management saves

    Success established by simple before and aftertype exhibits plus explanation of success exWelchs style and initiatives

    coupled with a general lessons from GEconclusion; you too can succeed in businesswith the same initiatives

  • 8/6/2019 General Electric Ver 2 16-6-05 Gerpisa

    8/16

    Using the numbers:

    1. stock market performanceStock market data shows GEs success is

    ambiguous and mixed

    1. GEs share price shows a saw tooth pattern,not up and away growth

    2. shareholder gains depend on the timing oftheir purchase and sale of stock

    3. 5 not 20 glorious years.

  • 8/6/2019 General Electric Ver 2 16-6-05 Gerpisa

    9/16

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001

    $

    GE stock price 1980-2003 (using the average stock

    price during year and adjusted for stock splits)

  • 8/6/2019 General Electric Ver 2 16-6-05 Gerpisa

    10/16

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    800

    900

    1,000

    1980

    1982

    1984

    1986

    1988

    1990

    1992

    1994

    1996

    1998

    2000

    2002

    Index(1988=1

    00)

    S&P 500 constituents 1988=100 General Electric 1988=100

    GE market capitalisation, compared with the S&P 500

    (indexed at 1988=100)

  • 8/6/2019 General Electric Ver 2 16-6-05 Gerpisa

    11/16

    Using the numbers:

    2. a tale of two businessesGE Capital Services: high growth low ROCEGE Industrial: low growth high ROCE

    (1980-2003)

    1. Sales growth driven by GE CapitalServices23% CAGR for GECS vs 5.5% for GE Ind

    2. GECS lowers ROCE

    GECS ROCE = 2.4% vs GE Ind 14%

    Result = dramatic decline in corporate ROCE;paradoxical given 1990s SV literature; mostlyirrelevant to the stock market

  • 8/6/2019 General Electric Ver 2 16-6-05 Gerpisa

    12/16

    0

    20,000

    40,000

    60,000

    80,000

    100,000

    120,000

    140,000

    160,000

    $millio

    1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001

    GE Industri l GE Capital Servi es

    GE real sales revenue 1980-2003 $million (in real 2003 prices)

  • 8/6/2019 General Electric Ver 2 16-6-05 Gerpisa

    13/16

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    %

    1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002

    GE consolidated (post-tax) return on capital employed (ROCE)

  • 8/6/2019 General Electric Ver 2 16-6-05 Gerpisa

    14/16

    GE

    The undisclosed business model Need to distinguish between explicit and

    undisclosed business models

    Explicit business models are disclosed in thecompanys narrative and discussed by otheractors

    Undisclosed business models are not explicitlyarticulated by the company or CEO or discussedby media, analysts etc (nb, not hidden)

  • 8/6/2019 General Electric Ver 2 16-6-05 Gerpisa

    15/16

    5 principles of the

    undisclosed business model1. Run the industrial business for margins to cover

    earnings requirement

    2. Build industrial services to cover the hollowing out

    of manufacturing

    3. Deal on a large scale to reach return and growth

    objectives

    4. Use acquisition and divestment to increase opacity

    5. Grow the financial business up to the limits of the

    companys credit rating (the critical importance of

    GE Industrials AAA rating)

  • 8/6/2019 General Electric Ver 2 16-6-05 Gerpisa

    16/16

    Conclusion:

    1. The limits of the GE way GE as special case/company specific reasons

    for success (eg AAA rating). Not the initiatives

    Few transferable lessons for other businesses;

    different circumstances other levers2. The potential of narrative and numbers

    Focuses the constitutive effects of narrative:representations of success and their effects

    How numbers can be played against narrative(because numbers are not a function of thenarrative)