g@it 2010: agency and gta transition alignment

41
G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment “Establishing the new interoperability model” August 25, 2008

Upload: nizana

Post on 05-Jan-2016

39 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment. “Establishing the new interoperability model” August 25, 2008. Agenda. Managing Change Service Levels Finance GTA Structure. Why Are We Here?. G@IT 2010 contract signing occurs in 52 days - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

G@IT 2010:Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

“Establishing the new interoperability model”August 25, 2008

Page 2: G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

Georgia Technology Authority

2

Agenda

• Managing Change

• Service Levels

• Finance

• GTA Structure

Page 3: G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

Georgia Technology Authority

3

Why Are We Here?

• G@IT 2010 contract signing occurs in 52 days

• Transition of IT infrastructure to selected providers begins in October

Page 4: G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

Georgia Technology Authority

4

What Will Be Different?

• State will acquire services, not equipment

• GTA will manage delivery of services (What), not hardware and software (How)

• GTA manages service providers through:▪ Service levels▪ Governance through active management

• Processes will change − procurement, billing, budgeting

• Service delivery improved through processes

Page 5: G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

Georgia Technology Authority

5

Where We Are in the Process

Phase 1: Assessment ▪ Completed December 2007

Phase 2: Procurement▪ Managed Network Services: October 2008▪ Infrastructure Services: November 2008

• Phase 3: Transition▪ October 2008 – April 2009

• Phase 4: Transformation▪ Ongoing throughout life of the contract

Page 6: G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

Georgia Technology Authority

6

Why We Must Change

• All agencies face similar risks▪ Aging infrastructure

▪ Not meeting minimum standards

▪ Weak security and disaster recovery

• Assessment validated…▪ Good people but thinly staffed

▪ Absence of processes

▪ Little measurement

▪ Duplicate spend but critical initiatives are under funded

▪ Disaster recovery gaps

The capabilities within the state to fix the problem have deteriorated to such an extent that only an enterprise-wide initiative that draws services and skills from the market has the opportunity to make timely repairs.

TPI Sourcing Assessment, December 2007

Page 7: G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

Georgia Technology Authority

7

Why Start Process Work Now?

• Waiting until the start of transition to identify change requirements risks degrading sourcing program momentum

• Alerting agencies to change that will be required, while important, is insufficient for successful implementation of the sourcing program

• Coordinated process development essential for success

Page 8: G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

Georgia Technology Authority

8

Governance Key to Successful Transformation

Time

Pe

rfo

rma

nc

e

Current Performance

Transition

Typical performance with unmanaged change

Intended performance with change

Change Implementation

Complete

Current Performance

Performance gap created

By unmanaged

change

Source: Technology Partners International, April 2008

Page 9: G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

Georgia Technology Authority

9

• GTA▪ Maintain the cornerstone (infrastructure) of your technology

through the diligent management of the providers ▪ Provide and drive the forums and decisions (governance)

necessary to align the providers to agency needs

• Agency▪ Business systems (software) you use to run your business

▪ Processes and methods you use to define, prioritize, communicate and manage your (business − technology) workload

Responsibilities

Page 10: G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

Georgia Technology Authority

10

SMO Disciplines Are Built on Process

• Financial analysis and planning

• Contract change management• Contract issue management

• Contract pricing adjustments

• Governance• Forecasting and demand

management • Regulatory and tax compliance• Workplace services• Customer satisfaction survey

management • Communications management• Project spend pool management

• Performance analysis and serviceand delivery management

• Service requests, authorization• Security, architecture and standards

management • Risk management• Asset management• Incident, problem, escalation,

change management

• Contract administration

• Dispute resolution• Service provider audit• Governance library

• Invoice management.• Performance credits,

earnbacks and criticalmilestones

• Procurement

• Value leakage mitigation• Chargeback

Relationship Management

Performance Management

FinancialManagement

ContractAdministration

Right work, done right Validate and manage costs

Satisfaction, direction setting Ensure compliance

Strategy & Objectives

Perspective on Governance includes

both state- and provider-facing

activities

Page 11: G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

Georgia Technology Authority

11

• Links agencies, provider and GTA together

• Increases the stability and reliability of the state’s infrastructure

• Enables variable capacity and capability

• Reduces risks through increased visibility

• Ensures the state’s security and disaster recovery profiles improve

• Helps quantify operational impacts…▪ Of your decisions and state mandates

▪ For accelerating and delaying projects

These Processes Have Benefits

Page 12: G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

Georgia Technology Authority

12

What Will GTA Do to Help You Get Ready?

• Establish enterprise standards ▪ We all have to eat the same cooking

• Lead an “Interoperability Project”▪ Evaluate top 3 integration points

▪ Recommend approach for agencies to prepare

▪ Offer process templates

▪ Suggest GTA support models

• Train▪ Technology management through service levels

▪ Forecasting and demand management

▪ Process orientation

Page 13: G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

Georgia Technology Authority

13

• Rate and speed of adoption

• Resistance

• Staff skills and proficiency

• Governance

Recognize that Georgia’s success will be defined by how well we manage change together:

Page 14: G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

Georgia Technology Authority

14

• Service levels are expressions of your expectations▪ State and provider agree to service levels and quality▪ They measure the service provider’s actual performance

• Your bills will be based on your consumption ▪ Provider sets base charge tied to specific service volumes▪ Volumes can be increased or decreased

• GTA will change to enable this transformation ▪ GTA’s new structure provides a disciplined approach to

managing service providers▪ State has adopted an international standard called ITIL▪ GTA will assist agencies in preparing key processes to link

into the provider

Three Concepts

Page 15: G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

Service Level Agreements (SLA) are expressions of your

expectations1. What’s Different About Our SLA's

2. We Want Performance − Not Money

3. Examples of Service Levels

4. We Have Flexibility in Our Metrics

5. Service Levels Are Not Penalties

Page 16: G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

Georgia Technology Authority

16

What’s Different About Our SLA’s?

• G@IT 2010 SLA’s will have financial implications

• They are built to influence behavior

• They have more options than voiding the contract

• They allow us to change our focus

• We don’t want the money

Page 17: G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

Georgia Technology Authority

17

• State will receive performance credits from the supplier for not providing the contracted (“expected”) service

• Supplier can earn back performance credits each year

• Key concepts▪ Expected Service Level

• Constantly missing these will cost the provider

▪ Minimum Service Level Default• Don’t make the big mistake; it will cost the provider

▪ Annual Earnback• Allowing them to earn back penalties changes behavior

We Want Performance − Not Money

Page 18: G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

Georgia Technology Authority

18

• System availability ▪ System up time ▪ System response time

• Problem management▪ Problem response time ▪ Problem resolution time

• Customer satisfaction▪ Transactions completed without complaint

• Helpdesk▪ Number of calls resolved on first call▪ Number of abandoned calls

Examples of Service Levels

Page 19: G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

Georgia Technology Authority

19

All CriticalMetrics SLA • 5• 4• 4• 3• 5• 5• 5• 4• 1• ==• 36 avg. is 4.0

• 5

• 3

• 5• 4• 1• ==• 18 avg. is 3.0

Agencies can influence these through participation in governance meetings

We have the right to select and

change which metrics we

want to elevate

By focusing on a limited number of metrics we

can get attention to weak areas

Using all metrics to manage the provider can obscure the

errors

Flexible Measure to Adjust

Page 20: G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

Georgia Technology Authority

20

• SLA’s were written to allow the provider to earn back penalties if:▪ They avoid future failures ▪ They can demonstrate it wasn’t their mistake ▪ They are willing to make investments that would lead to an

acceptable and sustained performance

• SLA’s are written to notice one-time events but only penalize for inconsistent delivery▪ Failures require more than just one clean month to resolve▪ A scorecard is maintained throughout the year

Service Levels Are Not Penalties

Page 21: G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

Your bills will be based on your consumption

1. GTA Coordination With OPB

2. What Is An RU (ARC/RRC)?

3. Need to Manage Your Consumption

4. What Level of Detail Is Available

Page 22: G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

Georgia Technology Authority

22

• GTA worked with OPB and agency budget directors… To calculate FY 2009 budget amendments for the “stub

period” (March – June 2009)

• Using agency base case data… GTA and OPB calculated amounts for FY 09 and FY 10 to be

“held harmless” from the 6%, 8% and 10% budget reductions

• Both of the above used base case data because vendor pricing was not available at the time “Stub period” was an estimated time frame Actual implementation could be a bit earlier or later depending

on negotiation with the vendors

IT Budgeting For FY 09 and FY 10:What’s Been Done

Page 23: G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

Georgia Technology Authority

23

IT Budgeting for FY 09 and FY 10:“To Do” List

• When contracts are signed in October and November:

▪ Work with each agency and OPB to evaluate needs/demand for services and compare against each agency’s level of funding

▪ Determine which agencies need additional funding and which need less

▪ Evaluate fund source impact

▪ Reallocate funds between agencies (OPB function) and reflect in the AFY 09 and FY 10 Governor’s Recommended Budget

Page 24: G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

Georgia Technology Authority

24

• Virtually unlimited capacity▪ Service provider will supply and charge for as many resource units as

you can consume▪ Validation of invoices for accuracy is a must▪ Agencies should always be conscious of consumption trends

• Project activity▪ Provider resources have a lower price if you can prioritize within the

capacity of the contract▪ Little projects (Little “p”) are projects that can be accomplished with the

same type and capacity of resources we have today and the cost is included

▪ Big Projects (Big “P”) are projects that expand beyond our current capacity and require the vendor to add resources

▪ Better planning can lower cost ▪ Disaster Recovery and Security will now be required to be priced into

new projects

Need to Manage Your Consumption

Page 25: G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

Georgia Technology Authority

25

• WAN▪ Site connection to the state network (WAN site)

• 3 tiers based on site attributes▪ Use of the connection (Transport)

• LAN▪ Maintenance of a person’s connection to the Local Area Network (LAN)▪ Wireless access point ▪ Move, add and change of a connection (IMAC)

• Voice▪ Upcharge per call center seat▪ Interactive Voice Response (IVR) per user ▪ Changes to phone setups (IMAC)

• Per user: includes maintenance, hardware and carrier▪ Video conference per room and call

Example of Network/Voice Resource Units

Page 26: G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

Georgia Technology Authority

26

• IBM ▪ Application CPU hour

▪ Automated application tape storage GBs

▪ Manual application tape mounts

• Unisys▪ Standard units of processing (SUPs)

▪ Application tapes in storage (active rotation)

• IBM and Unisys▪ Allocated disk space (DASD)

▪ Application tapes in storage

• Print (standard and custom)▪ Mainframe output print images

Examples of Mainframe Resource Units

Page 27: G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

Georgia Technology Authority

27

• Defined as business applications, middleware, database or web

• Priced per operating system instance▪ By operating system type (Windows or UNIX)

▪ By complexity

• Hardware and hardware maintenance priced via a separate monthly hardware charge

• Application utility software priced via separate monthly software charge▪ Compilers, database, development tools, middleware, etc.

Examples of Application ServersResource Units

Page 28: G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

Georgia Technology Authority

28

• Defined as e-mail, file/print, enterprise gateways, presentation and terminal

• Resource units▪ E-mail accounts▪ LAN-attached devices

• Application utility software priced via separate monthly software charge

• Infrastructure servers are not a separate resource unit and are not priced discretely▪ Domain services, enterprise security, enterprise backup,

enterprise scheduling and software distribution

Examples of Utility ServersResource Units

Page 29: G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

Georgia Technology Authority

29

• Server storage▪ Enterprise storage vs. local storage

▪ Replication and backup

• End-user computing▪ By device type

▪ By central/remote location

▪ Requesting service provider best practice: Premium service and non-standards devices

• Service desk▪ Authorized user

Example of Infrastructure Resource Units

Page 30: G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

Georgia Technology Authority

30

BaselineBaseline

Base Charge covers theResource Baseline2,500

0

2,000

Year 1 Year 5

Each Resource addition over the Baseline is charged as an Additional Resource

Charge (ARCs)

Each Resource removed under the Baseline is credited as a Reduced

Resource Credit (RRCs)

Resource

UnIt

Volume

ARC

RRCAbove and below

theResource

Thresholdspricing rates will be renegotiated within defined

parameters

ThresholdsThresholdsProtection For Reduced Volume•No minimum commitments•Extraordinary events•Full and Partial Termination Rights•Benchmarking with automatic adjustment

Competitive Pricing Of Additional Volume•No exclusivity•Extraordinary events•Benchmarking with automatic adjustment

1,500

What Is An ARC and RRC?(Variable Pricing and Terminology)

Page 31: G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

GTA will change to enable this transformation

1. How Will GTA Change? Operations Becomes SMO

2. What is ITIL? New Standard

3. GTA to Help Agencies Link Into the Providers

4. Change From the Agency Seat

5. What Happens Next

Page 32: G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

Georgia Technology Authority

32

New GTA OrganizationWill Provide the Governance

To enable this new Relationship

Service Provider

Agency

AgencyIT Staff

ServiceDesk

GTA Tech SME

We will retain a few high end technical

experts

GTA:- Contracts- Finance- Governance- Escalation

We will actively manage

the contract

We will have a consultant

assigned to your agency

GTA Delivery Consultant

How Does This All Fit Together?

Page 33: G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

Georgia Technology Authority

33

Statewide layer (Enterprise)▪ Budgeting and finance ▪ Enterprise technology

• IT strategic planning

• IT policies, standards and guidelines

• IT project assurance

▪ Information security

Service Management Organization (Operations)▪ Managing a collection of providers ▪ Accountable for the delivery of services

Components of GTA’s New Structure

Page 34: G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

Georgia Technology Authority

34

Service Management Organization

An organization set up to manage the relationship and services of GTA’s external and internal service providers

The SMO is established as a single point of accountability within an organization for the effective management of the providers

Replaces GTA’s existing Operations

What is an SMO?

Page 35: G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

Georgia Technology Authority

35

VMO: Vendor Management Organization Weak strategy and planningVMO: Vendor Management Organization Weak strategy and planning

SDO: Service Delivery OrganizationDamaged relationships between firmsSDO: Service Delivery OrganizationDamaged relationships between firms

52%37%

11%

GTA has created new organizations that align to resolve typical sourcing issues

ASO: Administrative Service Organization Inadequate legal and financial terms and conditionsASO: Administrative Service Organization Inadequate legal and financial terms and conditions

Typical Industry Problems and GTA’s Solutions

Page 36: G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

Georgia Technology Authority

36

What is the ITIL Standard?

ITIL (IT Infrastructure Library) provides a framework of best practice guidance for IT service management

ITIL has grown to become the most widely accepted approach to IT service management in the world: www.itil-officialsite.com

This standard drives processes that control cost and drive stability into the infrastructure

ITIL is the objective standard that we will require of our providers and our processes

Page 37: G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

Georgia Technology Authority

37

GTA has launched an “Interoperability Project” with the following deliverables:▪ Identify and coordinate linkages between agencies

and GTA’s Service Management Organization

▪ Provide agency interoperability roadmaps

Project will focus on the following key process areas:▪ Service request management

▪ Change management

▪ Demand and forecast management

Interoperability Project to Reduce Confusion

Page 38: G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

Georgia Technology Authority

38

Project start-up: Aug. 11– 14

Review, assemble interoperability profiles: Aug. 15 – 20

• Interview agency leads, validate profiles: Aug. 21 – Sept. 12

• Define linkages between agencies and SMO: Sept. 13 – 19

• Develop, deliver agency roadmaps Sept. 20 – Oct. 3

Interoperability Project Timeline

Page 39: G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

Georgia Technology Authority

39

What Happens Next…

• Communicate, communicate, communicate

• Agencies make GAIT 2010 transition a top 5 project

• Providers come in for due diligence

• GTA runs Interoperability Project

• Agency agreements are coming

• We will schedule another meeting

Page 40: G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

Georgia Technology Authority

40

Governance Key to Successful Transformation

Time

Pe

rfo

rma

nc

e

Current Performance

Transition

Typical performance with unmanaged change

Intended performance with change

Change Implementation

Complete

Current Performance

Performance gap created

By unmanaged

change

Source: Technology Partners International, April 2008

Page 41: G@IT 2010: Agency and GTA Transition Alignment

Georgia Technology Authority

41

Questions

ProcessesProcesses are the foundations for consistency

Service levelsService levels are the expression of requirements

MetricsMetrics are the transparency of performance