global standards management process (gsmp) 2nd quarter ...€¦ · global standards management...

Global Standards Management Process (GSMP) 2nd Quarter 2017 report

July 2017 © 2017 GS1 AISBL of 16

Global Standards Management Process

(GSMP) 2nd Quarter 2017 report

An update on the previous quarters, key facts and figures

Release 1.0, April – June (Q2)



Table of Contents

1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 3

2 Standards and guidelines are created through the GSMP 4-Step Process ...... 3

3 Standards Activity ........................................................................................ 3

3.1 Standards delivered in this quarter .................................................................................... 3

3.1.1 Standards delivered in Q1 ........................................................................................ 4

3.2 Major standards work status ............................................................................................. 5

3.2.1 Risks: .................................................................................................................... 5

3.3 Work request activity ....................................................................................................... 5

3.3.1 Top work request submitters .................................................................................... 7

3.3.2 Work request aging report ....................................................................................... 7

3.4 Standards Development Work Group ................................................................................. 7

3.4.1 Standards Maintenance Groups (SMGs) ..................................................................... 8

3.4.2 Mission-specific Work Groups (MSWG) ....................................................................... 8

3.5 Performance ................................................................................................................... 8

3.5.1 Standards maintenance work ................................................................................... 8

3.5.2 Development work ................................................................................................ 10

4 Participation ............................................................................................... 10

4.1 GSMP company membership .......................................................................................... 11

4.2 Voting.......................................................................................................................... 11

4.3 Event attendance .......................................................................................................... 12

5 Quality ....................................................................................................... 12

5.1 Due process ................................................................................................................. 13

5.2 Consensus .................................................................................................................... 13

5.3 Satisfaction survey results .............................................................................................. 13

5.3.1 GSMP member satisfaction survey .......................................................................... 13

5.3.2 GS1 Industry and Standards Event March 2017 satisfaction survey ............................. 14

5.3.3 GS1 Member Organisation satisfaction survey .......................................................... 14

6 GSMP Governance Groups .......................................................................... 15

6.1 Board Committee for Standards (BCS) members ............................................................... 15

6.2 Industry Engagement Steering Committee (IESC) members ............................................... 15

6.3 Architecture Group (AG) members .................................................................................. 15

More information .............................................................................................. 16



1 Introduction

The Global Standards Management Process (GSMP) is a community-based process for creating deliverables that serve the GS1® community.

The deliverables from GSMP are:

GS1 standards: documents that trading partners agree to follow in order to achieve interoperability goals. The rules that must be followed are called normative statements.

GS1 guidelines: non-normative documents that assist individual organisations in understanding and applying GS1 standards.

Collateral materials: other documents that provide an understanding of GS1

standards and GS1 guidelines and how to use them.

This report contains the standards and guideline development activity for the 2nd quarter of 2017 (April - June).

2 Standards and guidelines are created through the GSMP 4-Step Process

Figure 2-1 GSMP process

3 Standards Activity

3.1 Standards delivered in this quarter

The EANCOM Standard Edition 2016 was issued as the EANCOM technical solution for all EDI business requirements approved during last two years (2015-2016). This implementation will

improve business functionality of EANCOM 2002. It will benefit the whole EDI user community.

The GDSN Healthcare Use Cases Guideline has been updated to the GDSN Standard version 3.1.2

The GDSN Maintenance Release 3.1.3, Business Message Standard, has been updated for the November 2017 release. This release includes work requests approved (for the release) by 25

October 2016 that are backward compatible, and includes Validations, Global Product Classification,

Codes and Attribute Value Pairs

The GDSN Medical Device Non UDI Implementation Guideline has been updated to reflect the GDSN Standard 3.1.2

Updates were made to The General Specifications Standard through General Specification Change Notifications (GSCN’s) for the following:

Help companies minimise the size of a GS1-128 barcode



Consumer Product Variant Identifier – Introduce a new entity and identifier, within the GS1 General Specifications, to facilitate communication of trade item changes for which a new GTIN is not required

A new guideline, The use of GS1 Identification Keys in GS1 EDI Messages Implementation Guideline, was developed to explain how GS1 keys should be used in GS1 EDI messages and their benefits

The GS1 Image Specification Guideline was updated for ease of use

A new guideline, The Pharmaceutical Image Implementation Guideline, was developed to assist in product identification and patient medication information sheets for oral solid pharmaceuticals

The Global Product Classification (GPC) Standard June, 2017 Publication was issued and brings valuable new content such as new Bricks to expand classification in Cosmetics, Photography, Hormonal Contraception, DIY Products, and Crops. This standard will be implemented into the GDSN Network in the near future.

3.1.1 Standards delivered in Q1

The EPCIS and Core Business Vocabulary (CBV) Implementation Guideline has been updated

to incorporate the revised EPCIS and Core Business Vocabulary (CBV) Standard, V1.2. The implementation guideline is intended to provide supply chain stakeholders, including manufacturers, distributors, retailers, logistics providers, solution providers, business process architects; IT departments (developers) and solution providers with an introduction to implementing a visibility system using EPCIS, the Core Business Vocabulary specifically and GS1 standards.

GS1 General Specifications Standard v17 has been updated to include 24 work requests (e.g. MRO in Rail, align on human readable interpretation, New Ai for paperless coupon, etc…). The GS1

General Specifications Standard is the core standards document of the GS1 System describing how GS1 bar codes and identification keys should be used.

A new GS1 XML EDI Maintenance Release 3.3 Standard includes all technical solutions for all business requirements approved during last two years (2015/2016).

A new version of the EPC Tag Data Standard (TDS), 1.10 defines the Electronic Product Code (EPC), including its representation at various levels of the GS1 Architecture and GS1 System

Landscape (e.g., on EPC/RFID tags and in EPCIS events), and specifies the data carried on more Gen2 RFID tags. TDS 1.10 includes a number of backward-compatible enhancements, such as data carrier-neutral EPC URIs for the Global Identification Number for Consignment (GINC), the Global Shipment Identification Number (GSIN) and the BIC container code, as well as additional EPC/RFID filter values for the Global Document Type Identifier (GDTI) and the Aerospace and Defense Identifier

(ADI). Additionally, new AIs have been added for encoding in EPC User Memory, harmonising TDS with version 17 of the GS1 General Specifications, and the TID Memory Bank has been aligned with

the EPC Gen2 UHF air interface protocol.



3.2 Major standards work status

Figure 3-1 Major standards work status graphic

Legend:

on-target at risk will not meet target complete

Future work planned:

GS1 XML Maintenance Release 3.4

EANCOM Major Release

GDSN 3.1.(TBD) Maintenance Release Suite of Standards (go live target May 2018)

3.2.1 Risks:

The working group has not reached consensus, which may impact the original delivery date

3.3 Work request activity

Work requests (WR) entered for new standards or modifications to existing standards.

67 work requests were entered this quarter

70 work requests were closed this quarter

Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4

Target Date SteeringGroup

FormationRequirements

Standard in

DevelopmentCollateral Completed

Global Product Classification (GPC) Standard Jun-17

EANCOM® 2002 Edition 2016 Jun-17

Application Standard for MRO in Rail (Phase 2) Dec-17

General Specification Standard Jul-17

� - Consumer Product Variant Identifier Jul-17

� - Right Shoe / Left shoe Jul-17

� - Basic UDI-DI Identification Jul-17

� - Temperature Sensor Monitor Jul-17

Add Consumer Product Variant Attributes to the

GDDJul-17

Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) 4 new EDI

messages for Cash Handling Machines Aug-17

Global Traceability Standard 2 (GTS2) Sep-17

Tagged Item Performance Protocol (TIPP)

(Phase 2)Sep-17

GDSN 3.1.3 Maintenance Release Suite of

Standards (production deployment)Nov-17

High-Speed Barcode Printing (HSBP) Oct-16

GSMP Standards Development Key Projects

Ratification pending EU decision



Figure 3-2 Work Requests submitted to Standards Maintenance Groups

Work Requests are classified and reported in several ways below:

Table 3-1 Work requests submitted for each standard

Standard 2014 2015 2016 2017 YTD

Automatic Identification Data Capture (AIDC) * 26 27 31 15

Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) (Transactional Data)

27 37 118 21

Electronic Product Code (Tag Data Standard & UHF)

1 6 3 1

EPCIS & Core Business Vocabulary (CBV) 5 2 3 3

GDSN Package Measurement Rules 4 5 6 1

GLN Services 1

Global Data Synchronisation 121 218 240 83

Global Product Classification 28 77 123 23

Global Traceability Standard 0 5 1 3

Product Image Specification 9 3 10 1

Tagged item Performance Protocol 0 0 0 1

Other (Process, SmartSearch, New Standard) 3 3 0 0

Total 224 383 535 153

Table 3-2 Work request submitted by category

Category 2014 2015 2016 2017 YTD

Maintenance 209 368 526 143

Development 15 15 9 4

In assessment 6

Total 224 383 535 153

Table 3-3 Work requests submitted by region

Region 2014 2015 2016 2017 YTD

Americas 89 175 148 41

Asia Pacific 14 10 9 7

Middle East & Africa 0 0 0 0

Europe 121 198 378 105

Total 224 383 535 153

DA, 1,

1%

EDI, 21,

15%

GMD,

82, 58%

GPC,

23, 16%

ID,

15,

10%

58% For GMD



Table 3-4 Work requests submitted by member type

Member type 2014 2015 2016 2017 YTD

Global Office 19 28 22 17

Member Organisation 154 229 364 104

Users 51 126 149 32

Total 224 383 535 153

3.3.1 Top work request submitters

Figure 3-2 Top submitter organisations

3.3.2 Work request aging report

The implementation of best-in-class improvements has resulted in a significant reduction of work requests in the system over the last 500 days. Work requests not actionable for standards development were either withdrawn, or sent back to the submitter as “not actionable for standards development”. 90 work requests remain open in GSMP as of 30 June 2017.

Table 3-5 Overall aging report in days

Days open = WR submission to end of quarter

Under 100 100-200 200-500 Over 500 Total

GSMP Maintenance 42 11 4 57

GSMP Development 1 (Budi)

2 (MRO phase 2 &

GTS2)

2 (1 EDI CH &

EANCOM) 1 (HSBP*) 6

In assessment 4 4

Total 47 13 6 1 67

3.4 Standards Development Work Group

Standards Development (SD) Groups are responsible for GS1 system development including,

developing GS1 standards, GS1 guidelines, and other deliverables that support their deployment. There are two kinds of SD work groups:

Standards Maintenance Groups (SMG): SMGs have an indefinite lifetime, are responsible for the on-going maintenance and enhancement of one or more existing GS1 standards or GS1 guidelines.

Mission-specific Work Groups (MSWG): MSWGs are formed to do a specific piece of work as described in its charter, which disbands when the work is complete.

Mission-specific Work Groups are created for most work efforts of substantial scope.

Organization 2014 2015 2016 2017 YTD

Totals

GS1 Germany * 22 77 161 6 266

1WorldSync Holdings, Inc. 31 100 86 21 238

GS1 Netherlands * 27 34 43 21 125

GS1 US * 31 49 32 9 121

GS1 France * 25 16 43 24 108

GS1 Canada * 13 14 21 7 55

Carrefour 0 1 37 0 38

GS1 Sweden 5 11 12 6 34

GS1 Australia 10 8 9 6 33

GS1 Spain 5 2 5 9 21

85% Of all WR

submitted

* Top 5 GS1 Member Organisation submitters



Standards Development Work Group overview:

5 Standards Maintenance Groups (SMGs) are active; Barcodes and Traceability & Event Sharing SMG’s are not active at this time

5 Mission-specific Work Groups (MSWGs) are active

3.4.1 Standards Maintenance Groups (SMGs)

Table 3-6 Standards Maintenance Groups operating

Group name Call to action date Group status

Barcodes 15 Apr 2010 Inactive

Data Accuracy (DA) 15 Apr 2010 Working

Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) 15 Apr 2010 Working

Global Master Data (GMD) 15 Apr 2010 Working

Global Product Classification (GPC) 15 Apr 2010 Working

Identification (ID) 15 Apr 2010 Working

Traceability and Event Sharing (T&E) 26 May 2011 Inactive

3.4.2 Mission-specific Work Groups (MSWG)

Table 3-7 Mission-specific Work Groups operating

Group name Call to action date Group status

Application Standard for Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul Objects in Rail (MRO)

21 Feb 2016 Phase 2 Working

Basic Unique Devise Identification (Basic UDI – DI) 19 Apr 2017 Working

Global Traceability Standard 2 (GTS2) 15 Feb 2017 Working

High-speed Barcode Printing (HSBP) 10 Mar 2016 Inactive/standard awaiting

EU decision

Tagged Item Performance Protocol (TIPP) 19 Feb 2015 Phase 2 Working

3.4.2.1 Mission-specific Work Groups closed

EPCIS and Core Business Vocabulary (CBV) MSWG (Q1)

EPC Information Service (EPCIS) 1.1 and Core Business Vocabulary (CBV) (Q2)

3.5 Performance

Work requests are the entry point into the GSMP process to request new standards or modify existing standards per the process and procedures laid out in the GSMP Manual. A Work request becomes a Work Order when it is approved for standards development. The time it takes for a Work Order to be processed in GSMP is measured below.

3.5.1 Standards maintenance work

A Work Order is categorised as maintenance if it is a single, or a group of small changes to an existing standard or guideline, that can be developed in a Standards Maintenance Group. Examples: errata, new EDI code values, new symbol placement rules, GDSN Validation Rules.

There are two types of maintenance Work Orders:

Maintenance Type 1: Simple changes to a standard, considered on-time if it is completed within 180 days (10 day variance permitted)

Maintenance Type 2: Development time is expected to be longer than 180 days. These are

considered on-time, if completed within 365 days (10 day variance)

http://www.gs1.org/gsmp/community/working_groups/gsmp#BC



3.5.1.1 Standards Maintenance Groups’ performance

99% of all work orders completed this quarter were completed on-time (within the service level agreement stated above.

The median development time for a maintenance work request closed in 2017 ytd is 88

days.

Table 3-8 Standards Maintenance Groups work request activity summary for Q2

Standards Maintenance

Group (SMG)

Total WR

entered

this

quarter

Total WO

closed

this

quarter

Closed

on

time

Additional

time

needed

% Closed

on-time

Not

completed:

Solution

exists/bundle/

withdrawn

Open WR

30 June 2017

Data Accuracy (DA) 0 0 0 0 n/a 0 0

Electronic Data Interchange (formerly eCom)

2 16 16 0 100% 0 4

Global Master Data (GMD)

43 37 32 2 94% 3 33

Global Product Classification (GPC)

8 16 14 0 100% 2 9

Identification (ID) 9 2 2 0 100% 0 11

Traceability & Event Sharing

0 0 0 0 n/a 0 0

Total (SMG) 62 71 64 2 99% 5 57

Note: Maintenance on-time performance is measured from the submission date, to the GSMP complete date, and ready for ratification (if applicable).

Figure 3-3 - EDI and GMD SMG’s summary and performance

Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) Global Master Data (GMD)

Median days

in

development

2014 2015 2016 2017

2014 2015 2016 2017

Top WR submitter

GS1 Belgium Luxembourg and Philips Electronics (1 each)

1WordlSync Holdings, Inc. (11)

Highlights

EANCOM 2002 Edition 2016 has been published

EANCOM 20XX new version kick-off meeting has taken place during F2F meeting in Cologne on June 22nd. A

target date has been setup for June 2019

The EDI Cash Processing Machines messages BRAD has been successfully eBalloted. Technical Solution Development (BMS’s and Schemas) has started and should be done by August

GMD processed 58 % of all maintenance WRs entered this year

The Product Image Specification 3.0 and the GDS 3.1.2.1 Standards were published in May

The Work Request eBallot cutoff date for the next 2018 Global Data GDSN Maintenance Release was 10-May-2017



Figure 3-4 GPC and ID SMG’s summary and performance

Global Product Classification (GPC) Identification (ID)

Median days

in

development

2014 2015 2016 2017

2014 2015 2016 2017

Top WR

submitter GS1 Netherlands (2) Axicon Auto ID, LTD (3)

Highlights

GPC June 2017 Publication was published on June 28 2017. New classifications were added for flags, household furniture, stationary, audio

visual, and electrical supplies

GPC Milk/Milk Substitute work request is still underway and will be a significant change to associated bricks (WR 17-000030)

Development days are improving by implementing the Best-in-Class approach of only accepting Work Requests with a comprehensive business case and supporting details

eBallot approved expected General Specification publication July 2017

Consumer Product Variant Identifier

Right Shoe / Left Shoe GSCN in eBallot.

Expected publication July 2017

Risks: Temperature Monitor Sensor work request have not reached consensus to move forward to community review

Risk Mitigation: Options are being vetted and will be shared with ID SMG

Note: Traceability & Event Sharing SMG was not active in 2016 & 17 to date. Data Accuracy has minimal activity.

Legend:

All WR for year are closed WR are still open for year

3.5.2 Development work

A Work Order is categorised as development, if it involves creation of a new standard/guideline, or significant change to existing standard/guideline. Examples: extension to GDSN, a new EPCglobal High Frequency (HF) Air Interface Standard, enhancement to the EPCIS Standard to include

aggregation layers, a new barcode symbology, a new Business Message Standard. Development work is on-time, if the work is completed in, or under the estimated time to complete. The estimated

completion date is defined in the project plan at the start of the development stage.

Table 3-9 Completed development work on-time performance Work

Request Topic

Due date per project plan

Date completed On time

16-394 update to GS1's "EPCIS and CBV Implementation Guideline"

February 2017 February 2017 Yes

4 Participation

Participants in GSMP are organisations (companies or other recognised entities); each organisation is represented by one or more individual persons belonging to that organisation. There is no limit to the number of individuals from a single organisation that may participate. Companies not a member

of GS1 are non-voting. There are three types of participating members:

1. GSMP community member (non-voting)

Company has signed GS1 Intellectual Property (IP) Policy

Individual has joined the GSMP group in GS1 Community Room

2. GSMP community member (voting)

Company is a member of GS1



Company has signed GS1 Intellectual Property (IP) Policy

Individual has joined the GSMP group in GS1 Community Room

3. GSMP Work Group Member

Company has signed the GS1 IP Policy

Company has signed a group Opt-in Agreement

Member has joined the GSMP group in GS1 Community Room

4.1 GSMP company membership

GSMP changed membership management systems in April of 2017. All companies who did not have

active associates in the GS1 Community Room since January 1, 2016, were archived due to

inactivity.

GSMP has 333 active member companies, 287 companies are voting members and 46 companies are non-voting

Table 4-1 Member companies by interest category

Interest category # of participants

Academia 3

Association 9

Auto-ID 3

Central Bank 5

Data Pool 4

Distributor / Group Purchasing 7

Foodservice 1

Government Agency 6

GS1 Certified Data Pool 11

GS1 MO 53

Hospital 2

Logistics Provider 13

Manufacturer 86

Other 2

Regulatory Body 2

Retailer 36

Solution Provider 90

Grand Total 333

Table 4-2 Member companies by region

Region # of Companies

Asia Pacific 23

Europe 172

Middle East & Africa 12

The Americas 126

Total 333

4.2 Voting

Each company/organisation represents one vote in GSMP, regardless of the number of associates

voting. GSMP requirements and standards are approved by community eBallots. Each eBallot requires approximately 12 votes with additional minimum requirements of supply chain role votes (charter variations may apply). Due to system changes, voting statistics are not available for this quarter. Updated information will resume in Q3.



The average number of votes per ballot in Q1 was 19. Sixty Seven ballots (67) passed in Q1.

4.3 Event attendance

GS1 Global Office hosts two events every year for the GS1 community to collaborate face-to-face on

industry needs and the development of GS1 standards. These events are:

GS1 Standards Event, held in the USA

GS1 Industry and Standards Event, held in Europe

The GS1 Standards Event took place 20-24 March 2017 in Jersey City, New Jersey, USA. Attending the event were 200 individuals representing 66 companies.

Table 4-3 Event attendance by individual

Individual type 2014

Atlanta

2014

Rome

2015

Jersey City

2015

Warsaw

2016

Jersey City

2016 Brussels

2017 Jersey City

Affiliate, Associates, Auto-ID Lab, other

12 24 5 19 5 35 12

Data Pool and Solution Provider

32 68 21 42 25 63 19

Distributor / Group Purchasing and Manufacturer

38 26 28 24 30 29 17

Global Office Staff 51 54 51 53 49 80 50

GS1 MO 82 136 84 126 82 124 92

Hospital / Retailer 11 21 6 15 16 9 10

Total 226 329 195 279 207 340 200

Table 4-4 Event attendance by organisation

By organisation 2014

Atlanta

2014

Rome

2015

Jersey City

2015

Warsaw

2016

Jersey City

2016 Brussels

2017 Jersey City

Affiliate, Associates, Auto-ID Lab, other

11 20 5 15 5 26 7

Data Pool and Solution Provider

21 46 19 32 18 43 13

Distributor /

Group Purchasing and Manufacturer

20 22 19 16 24 25 15

Global Office staff 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

GS1 MO 25 32 22 30 24 27 23

Hospital and Retailer

8 13 5 10 13 6 7

Total 86 134 71 104 85 128 66

5 Quality

The GSMP defines quality as the entire process employed to ensure that all GS1 standards are user-driven, globally applicable, royalty-free (to the best of our ability) and that ultimately meets the

needs and requirements defined by its members.



5.1 Due process

All GSMP groups are expected to follow the processes and procedures specified in the GSMP Manual. A community eBallot is used to confirm community consensus to progress a draft standard, or other

GSMP deliverable.

5.2 Consensus

Decision-making is achieved through consensus, which is defined as approval without sustained opposition. Voting options are yes, no and abstain. Due to system changes, Q2 ballot data is not available. Updated data will resume in Q3.

Below are measures of due process and consensus in the GSMP:

Zero (0) due process infractions

87% of eBallots approved in Q1 were unanimous

99% of votes cast in Q1 were affirmative

5.3 Satisfaction survey results

GS1 issues several surveys to measure satisfaction with GSMP. Survey results are structured in three categories:

unfavourable = sum of very dissatisfied and fairly dissatisfied

neutral

favourable = sum of satisfied and very satisfied

Favourable and unfavourable answers are shown in percent using this structure: fav/unfav. Neutral

answers are not used in reporting the survey results, they are viewed as opportunities to move a response to favourable. The results of the three surveys are detailed in the next three sections.

5.3.1 GSMP member satisfaction survey

Overall satisfaction with GSMP rose 7 percentage points for the second year in a row, and reduced unsatisfactory ratings to a 4 year low. Staff satisfaction was down 5 percentage points, but is still the second highest rating in 4 years. Satisfaction with the GSMP process itself, maintained its 50% rating,

while achieving the least amount of unsatisfactory ratings in the last 4 years.

Figure 5-1 GSMP member satisfaction survey results



Table 5-1 GSMP member satisfaction survey results; satisfaction overall, with the staff, and with the process

Questions 2014 2015 2016 2017

Questions 20122013% FAVS/UNFAVS

Overall satisfaction with GSMP 57/7 57/13 64/8 71/3

Satisfaction with GSMP staff 73/4 66/9 81/2 76/3

Efficiency of process 39/14 43/17 50/8 50/5

5.3.2 GS1 Industry and Standards Event March 2017 satisfaction survey

Table 5-2 GS1 Event satisfaction survey results

Programme activity 2014

Atlanta 2014 Rome

2015 Jersey City

2015

Warsaw

2016 Jersey City

2016

Brussels

2017 Jersey City

Overall, how satisfied

were you with the GS1 Standards Event?

84/9 87/5 93/2 93/1 98/2 97/0 92/2

How satisfied were you with the event facilities? 73/9 60/17 94/2 91/4 99/0 79/6 91/0

How satisfied were you with the week's agenda? 69/16 81/5 75/7 89/11 96/4 98.2 88/13

How satisfied were you with the Tuesday Plenary?

72/9 62/8 76/9 68/16 93/7 80/7 92/0

Average 75% 73% 85% 85% 97% 89% 91%

5.3.3 GS1 Member Organisation satisfaction survey

Favourable responses from GS1 Member Organisations increased to 78%, the highest rating ever!

Figure 5-2 GSMP MO satisfaction survey results

Table 5-3 GS1 MO satisfaction survey results table

Question

% FAVS/UNFAVS

2014 2015 2016 2017

Overall satisfaction with GSMP 75/2 64/1 73/0 78/3

75

64

73 78

2014 2015 2016 2017



6 GSMP Governance Groups

6.1 Board Committee for Standards (BCS) members

Art Smith, GS1 Canada

Barron Witherspoon, Procter & Gamble Co.

Bernie Hogan, GS1 US

Elzbieta Halas, GS1 Poland

Jean-Marc Klopfenstein, Nestlé

Juan Antonio Sanfeliu, Manufacturas Antonio Gassol

Lori Bigler, J.M. Smucker Co.

Maria Palazzolo, GS1 Australia - Chairperson

Michael Rose, Johnson & Johnson

Miguel Lopera, GS1

Ulrich Schaefer, GS1 Germany

Vivek Balasubramanian, Amazon

Volker Zeiner, B. Braun

Wim van Herwijnen, METRO AG

Xavier Barras, GS1 France

6.2 Industry Engagement Steering Committee (IESC) members

Ana Paula Maniero, GS1 Brazil

Carrie Wilkie, GS1 US

Cédric Lecolley, GS1 France

Erin Hennessey, Procter & Gamble

Halim Recham, GS1 Algeria

Jeff Denton, Amerisource Bergen

Joachim Wilkins, C&A Europe / RSC Commercial Services

Loek Boortman, GS1 Netherlands

Marcel Sieira, GS1Australia

Mike Sadiwnyk, GS1 Canada

Mike Yorwerth, Tesco Global

Ruediger Hagedorn, Consumer Goods Forum

Virginia Vaamonde, GS1 Brazil

6.3 Architecture Group (AG) members

Dave Harty, Adents

Eugen Sehorz, GS1 Austria

Gina Tomassi, Pepsico

Henri Barthel, GS1 GO – Co‐Chair

Jens Kungl, Metro Group

Junyu Wang, Fudan Auto-ID Lab

Kevin Dean, GS1 Canada



Marc Cox, Philips

Mark Harrison, Milecastle Media

Paul Reid, GS1 UK

Ray Delnicki, GS1 US

Robert Beideman, GS1 GO

Roberto Matsubayashi, GS1 Brasil

Seán Lightholder, Walmart

Sean Lockhead, GS1 GO

Staffan Olsson, GS1 Sweden

Sue Schmid, GS1 Australia – Co‐Chair

Sylvia Rubio Alegren, ICA

Tony Zhang, FSEnet

Vera Feuerstein, Nestle – Co‐Chair

Xavier Barras, GS1 France

More information

Access this document and other GSMP reports at this website: http://www.gs1.org/gsmp/reports

Please contact Eileen Harpell with your questions or suggestions: [email protected]

http://www.gs1.org/gsmp/reports

http://intranet.gs1.org/gsmp/GSMP%20Reporting/Quarterly%20Reports/Q%202%202013/[email protected]

global standards management process (gsmp) 2nd quarter ...€¦ · global standards management...

Documents