global standards management process (gsmp) 2nd quarter 2017 … · 2017. 8. 9. · a new version of...
TRANSCRIPT
Global Standards Management Process (GSMP) 2nd Quarter 2017 report
July 2017 © 2017 GS1 AISBL Page 1 of 16
Global Standards Management Process
(GSMP) 2nd Quarter 2017 report
An update on the previous quarters, key facts and figures
Release 1.0, April – June (Q2)
Global Standards Management Process (GSMP) 2nd Quarter 2017 report
July 2017 © 2017 GS1 AISBL Page 2 of 16
Table of Contents
1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 3
2 Standards and guidelines are created through the GSMP 4-Step Process ...... 3
3 Standards Activity ........................................................................................ 3
3.1 Standards delivered in this quarter .................................................................................... 3
3.1.1 Standards delivered in Q1 ........................................................................................ 4
3.2 Major standards work status ............................................................................................. 5
3.2.1 Risks: .................................................................................................................... 5
3.3 Work request activity ....................................................................................................... 5
3.3.1 Top work request submitters .................................................................................... 7
3.3.2 Work request aging report ....................................................................................... 7
3.4 Standards Development Work Group ................................................................................. 7
3.4.1 Standards Maintenance Groups (SMGs) ..................................................................... 8
3.4.2 Mission-specific Work Groups (MSWG) ....................................................................... 8
3.5 Performance ................................................................................................................... 8
3.5.1 Standards maintenance work ................................................................................... 8
3.5.2 Development work ................................................................................................ 10
4 Participation ............................................................................................... 10
4.1 GSMP company membership .......................................................................................... 11
4.2 Voting.......................................................................................................................... 11
4.3 Event attendance .......................................................................................................... 12
5 Quality ....................................................................................................... 12
5.1 Due process ................................................................................................................. 13
5.2 Consensus .................................................................................................................... 13
5.3 Satisfaction survey results .............................................................................................. 13
5.3.1 GSMP member satisfaction survey .......................................................................... 13
5.3.2 GS1 Industry and Standards Event March 2017 satisfaction survey ............................. 14
5.3.3 GS1 Member Organisation satisfaction survey .......................................................... 14
6 GSMP Governance Groups .......................................................................... 15
6.1 Board Committee for Standards (BCS) members ............................................................... 15
6.2 Industry Engagement Steering Committee (IESC) members ............................................... 15
6.3 Architecture Group (AG) members .................................................................................. 15
More information .............................................................................................. 16
Global Standards Management Process (GSMP) 2nd Quarter 2017 report
July 2017 © 2017 GS1 AISBL Page 3 of 16
1 Introduction
The Global Standards Management Process (GSMP) is a community-based process for creating deliverables that serve the GS1® community.
The deliverables from GSMP are:
GS1 standards: documents that trading partners agree to follow in order to achieve interoperability goals. The rules that must be followed are called normative statements.
GS1 guidelines: non-normative documents that assist individual organisations in understanding and applying GS1 standards.
Collateral materials: other documents that provide an understanding of GS1 standards and GS1 guidelines and how to use them.
This report contains the standards and guideline development activity for the 2nd quarter of 2017 (April - June).
2 Standards and guidelines are created through the GSMP 4-Step Process
Figure 2-1 GSMP process
3 Standards Activity
3.1 Standards delivered in this quarter
The EANCOM Standard Edition 2016 was issued as the EANCOM technical solution for all EDI business requirements approved during last two years (2015-2016). This implementation will
improve business functionality of EANCOM 2002. It will benefit the whole EDI user community.
The GDSN Healthcare Use Cases Guideline has been updated to the GDSN Standard version 3.1.2
The GDSN Maintenance Release 3.1.3, Business Message Standard, has been updated for the November 2017 release. This release includes work requests approved (for the release) by 25 October 2016 that are backward compatible, and includes Validations, Global Product Classification,
Codes and Attribute Value Pairs
The GDSN Medical Device Non UDI Implementation Guideline has been updated to reflect the GDSN Standard 3.1.2
Updates were made to The General Specifications Standard through General Specification Change Notifications (GSCN’s) for the following:
Help companies minimise the size of a GS1-128 barcode
Global Standards Management Process (GSMP) 2nd Quarter 2017 report
July 2017 © 2017 GS1 AISBL Page 4 of 16
Consumer Product Variant Identifier – Introduce a new entity and identifier, within the GS1 General Specifications, to facilitate communication of trade item changes for which a new GTIN is not required
A new guideline, The use of GS1 Identification Keys in GS1 EDI Messages Implementation Guideline, was developed to explain how GS1 keys should be used in GS1 EDI messages and their benefits
The GS1 Image Specification Guideline was updated for ease of use
A new guideline, The Pharmaceutical Image Implementation Guideline, was developed to assist in product identification and patient medication information sheets for oral solid
pharmaceuticals
The Global Product Classification (GPC) Standard June, 2017 Publication was issued and brings valuable new content such as new Bricks to expand classification in Cosmetics, Photography, Hormonal Contraception, DIY Products, and Crops. This standard will be implemented into the GDSN Network in the near future.
3.1.1 Standards delivered in Q1
The EPCIS and Core Business Vocabulary (CBV) Implementation Guideline has been updated
to incorporate the revised EPCIS and Core Business Vocabulary (CBV) Standard, V1.2. The implementation guideline is intended to provide supply chain stakeholders, including manufacturers, distributors, retailers, logistics providers, solution providers, business process architects; IT departments (developers) and solution providers with an introduction to implementing a visibility
system using EPCIS, the Core Business Vocabulary specifically and GS1 standards.
GS1 General Specifications Standard v17 has been updated to include 24 work requests (e.g. MRO in Rail, align on human readable interpretation, New Ai for paperless coupon, etc…). The GS1
General Specifications Standard is the core standards document of the GS1 System describing how GS1 bar codes and identification keys should be used.
A new GS1 XML EDI Maintenance Release 3.3 Standard includes all technical solutions for all business requirements approved during last two years (2015/2016).
A new version of the EPC Tag Data Standard (TDS), 1.10 defines the Electronic Product Code (EPC), including its representation at various levels of the GS1 Architecture and GS1 System
Landscape (e.g., on EPC/RFID tags and in EPCIS events), and specifies the data carried on more Gen2 RFID tags. TDS 1.10 includes a number of backward-compatible enhancements, such as data carrier-neutral EPC URIs for the Global Identification Number for Consignment (GINC), the Global
Shipment Identification Number (GSIN) and the BIC container code, as well as additional EPC/RFID filter values for the Global Document Type Identifier (GDTI) and the Aerospace and Defense Identifier (ADI). Additionally, new AIs have been added for encoding in EPC User Memory, harmonising TDS with version 17 of the GS1 General Specifications, and the TID Memory Bank has been aligned with
the EPC Gen2 UHF air interface protocol.
Global Standards Management Process (GSMP) 2nd Quarter 2017 report
July 2017 © 2017 GS1 AISBL Page 5 of 16
3.2 Major standards work status
Figure 3-1 Major standards work status graphic
Legend:
on-target at risk will not meet target complete
Future work planned:
GS1 XML Maintenance Release 3.4
EANCOM Major Release
GDSN 3.1.(TBD) Maintenance Release Suite of Standards (go live target May 2018)
3.2.1 Risks:
The working group has not reached consensus, which may impact the original delivery date
3.3 Work request activity
Work requests (WR) entered for new standards or modifications to existing standards.
67 work requests were entered this quarter
70 work requests were closed this quarter
Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4
Target Date SteeringGroup
FormationRequirements
Standard in
DevelopmentCollateral Completed
Global Product Classification (GPC) Standard Jun-17
EANCOM® 2002 Edition 2016 Jun-17
Application Standard for MRO in Rail (Phase 2) Dec-17
General Specification Standard Jul-17
� - Consumer Product Variant Identifier Jul-17
� - Right Shoe / Left shoe Jul-17
� - Basic UDI-DI Identification Jul-17
� - Temperature Sensor Monitor Jul-17
Add Consumer Product Variant Attributes to the
GDDJul-17
Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) 4 new EDI
messages for Cash Handling Machines Aug-17
Global Traceability Standard 2 (GTS2) Sep-17
Tagged Item Performance Protocol (TIPP)
(Phase 2)Sep-17
GDSN 3.1.3 Maintenance Release Suite of
Standards (production deployment)Nov-17
High-Speed Barcode Printing (HSBP) Oct-16
GSMP Standards Development Key Projects
Ratification pending EU decision
Global Standards Management Process (GSMP) 2nd Quarter 2017 report
July 2017 © 2017 GS1 AISBL Page 6 of 16
Figure 3-2 Work Requests submitted to Standards Maintenance Groups
Work Requests are classified and reported in several ways below:
Table 3-1 Work requests submitted for each standard
Standard 2014 2015 2016 2017 YTD
Automatic Identification Data Capture (AIDC) * 26 27 31 15
Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) (Transactional Data)
27 37 118 21
Electronic Product Code (Tag Data Standard & UHF)
1 6 3 1
EPCIS & Core Business Vocabulary (CBV) 5 2 3 3
GDSN Package Measurement Rules 4 5 6 1
GLN Services 1
Global Data Synchronisation 121 218 240 83
Global Product Classification 28 77 123 23
Global Traceability Standard 0 5 1 3
Product Image Specification 9 3 10 1
Tagged item Performance Protocol 0 0 0 1
Other (Process, SmartSearch, New Standard) 3 3 0 0
Total 224 383 535 153
Table 3-2 Work request submitted by category
Category 2014 2015 2016 2017 YTD
Maintenance 209 368 526 143
Development 15 15 9 4
In assessment 6
Total 224 383 535 153
Table 3-3 Work requests submitted by region
Region 2014 2015 2016 2017 YTD
Americas 89 175 148 41
Asia Pacific 14 10 9 7
Middle East & Africa 0 0 0 0
Europe 121 198 378 105
Total 224 383 535 153
DA, 1,
1%
EDI, 21,
15%
GMD,
82, 58%
GPC,
23, 16%
ID,
15,
10%
58% For GMD
Global Standards Management Process (GSMP) 2nd Quarter 2017 report
July 2017 © 2017 GS1 AISBL Page 7 of 16
Table 3-4 Work requests submitted by member type
Member type 2014 2015 2016 2017 YTD
Global Office 19 28 22 17
Member Organisation 154 229 364 104
Users 51 126 149 32
Total 224 383 535 153
3.3.1 Top work request submitters
Figure 3-2 Top submitter organisations
3.3.2 Work request aging report
The implementation of best-in-class improvements has resulted in a significant reduction of work requests in the system over the last 500 days. Work requests not actionable for standards development were either withdrawn, or sent back to the submitter as “not actionable for standards development”. 90 work requests remain open in GSMP as of 30 June 2017.
Table 3-5 Overall aging report in days
Days open = WR submission to end of quarter
Under 100 100-200 200-500 Over 500 Total
GSMP Maintenance 42 11 4 57
GSMP Development 1 (Budi)
2 (MRO phase 2 &
GTS2)
2 (1 EDI CH &
EANCOM) 1 (HSBP*) 6
In assessment 4 4
Total 47 13 6 1 67
3.4 Standards Development Work Group
Standards Development (SD) Groups are responsible for GS1 system development including, developing GS1 standards, GS1 guidelines, and other deliverables that support their deployment. There are two kinds of SD work groups:
Standards Maintenance Groups (SMG): SMGs have an indefinite lifetime, are responsible for the on-going maintenance and enhancement of one or more existing GS1 standards or GS1 guidelines.
Mission-specific Work Groups (MSWG): MSWGs are formed to do a specific piece of work as described in its charter, which disbands when the work is complete.
Mission-specific Work Groups are created for most work efforts of substantial scope.
Organization 2014 2015 2016 2017 YTD
Totals
GS1 Germany * 22 77 161 6 266
1WorldSync Holdings, Inc. 31 100 86 21 238
GS1 Netherlands * 27 34 43 21 125
GS1 US * 31 49 32 9 121
GS1 France * 25 16 43 24 108
GS1 Canada * 13 14 21 7 55
Carrefour 0 1 37 0 38
GS1 Sweden 5 11 12 6 34
GS1 Australia 10 8 9 6 33
GS1 Spain 5 2 5 9 21
85% Of all WR
submitted
* Top 5 GS1 Member Organisation submitters
Global Standards Management Process (GSMP) 2nd Quarter 2017 report
July 2017 © 2017 GS1 AISBL Page 8 of 16
Standards Development Work Group overview:
5 Standards Maintenance Groups (SMGs) are active; Barcodes and Traceability & Event Sharing SMG’s are not active at this time
5 Mission-specific Work Groups (MSWGs) are active
3.4.1 Standards Maintenance Groups (SMGs)
Table 3-6 Standards Maintenance Groups operating
Group name Call to action date Group status
Barcodes 15 Apr 2010 Inactive
Data Accuracy (DA) 15 Apr 2010 Working
Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) 15 Apr 2010 Working
Global Master Data (GMD) 15 Apr 2010 Working
Global Product Classification (GPC) 15 Apr 2010 Working
Identification (ID) 15 Apr 2010 Working
Traceability and Event Sharing (T&E) 26 May 2011 Inactive
3.4.2 Mission-specific Work Groups (MSWG)
Table 3-7 Mission-specific Work Groups operating
Group name Call to action date Group status
Application Standard for Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul Objects in Rail (MRO)
21 Feb 2016 Phase 2 Working
Basic Unique Devise Identification (Basic UDI – DI) 19 Apr 2017 Working
Global Traceability Standard 2 (GTS2) 15 Feb 2017 Working
High-speed Barcode Printing (HSBP) 10 Mar 2016 Inactive/standard awaiting
EU decision
Tagged Item Performance Protocol (TIPP) 19 Feb 2015 Phase 2 Working
3.4.2.1 Mission-specific Work Groups closed
EPCIS and Core Business Vocabulary (CBV) MSWG (Q1)
EPC Information Service (EPCIS) 1.1 and Core Business Vocabulary (CBV) (Q2)
3.5 Performance
Work requests are the entry point into the GSMP process to request new standards or modify existing standards per the process and procedures laid out in the GSMP Manual. A Work request becomes a Work Order when it is approved for standards development. The time it takes for a Work Order to be processed in GSMP is measured below.
3.5.1 Standards maintenance work
A Work Order is categorised as maintenance if it is a single, or a group of small changes to an
existing standard or guideline, that can be developed in a Standards Maintenance Group. Examples: errata, new EDI code values, new symbol placement rules, GDSN Validation Rules.
There are two types of maintenance Work Orders:
Maintenance Type 1: Simple changes to a standard, considered on-time if it is completed within 180 days (10 day variance permitted)
Maintenance Type 2: Development time is expected to be longer than 180 days. These are
considered on-time, if completed within 365 days (10 day variance)
Global Standards Management Process (GSMP) 2nd Quarter 2017 report
July 2017 © 2017 GS1 AISBL Page 9 of 16
3.5.1.1 Standards Maintenance Groups’ performance
99% of all work orders completed this quarter were completed on-time (within the service level agreement stated above.
The median development time for a maintenance work request closed in 2017 ytd is 88
days.
Table 3-8 Standards Maintenance Groups work request activity summary for Q2
Standards Maintenance
Group (SMG)
Total WR
entered
this
quarter
Total WO
closed
this
quarter
Closed
on
time
Additional
time
needed
% Closed
on-time
Not
completed:
Solution
exists/bundle/
withdrawn
Open WR
30 June 2017
Data Accuracy (DA) 0 0 0 0 n/a 0 0
Electronic Data Interchange (formerly eCom)
2 16 16 0 100% 0 4
Global Master Data (GMD)
43 37 32 2 94% 3 33
Global Product Classification (GPC)
8 16 14 0 100% 2 9
Identification (ID) 9 2 2 0 100% 0 11
Traceability & Event Sharing
0 0 0 0 n/a 0 0
Total (SMG) 62 71 64 2 99% 5 57
Note: Maintenance on-time performance is measured from the submission date, to the GSMP complete date, and ready for ratification (if applicable).
Figure 3-3 - EDI and GMD SMG’s summary and performance
Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) Global Master Data (GMD)
Median days
in
development
2014 2015 2016 2017
2014 2015 2016 2017
Top WR submitter
GS1 Belgium Luxembourg and Philips Electronics (1 each)
1WordlSync Holdings, Inc. (11)
Highlights
EANCOM 2002 Edition 2016 has been published
EANCOM 20XX new version kick-off meeting has taken place during F2F meeting in Cologne on June 22nd. A
target date has been setup for June 2019
The EDI Cash Processing Machines messages BRAD has been successfully eBalloted. Technical Solution Development (BMS’s and Schemas) has started and should be done by August
GMD processed 58 % of all maintenance WRs entered this year
The Product Image Specification 3.0 and the GDS 3.1.2.1 Standards were published in May
The Work Request eBallot cutoff date for the next 2018 Global Data GDSN Maintenance Release was 10-May-2017
Global Standards Management Process (GSMP) 2nd Quarter 2017 report
July 2017 © 2017 GS1 AISBL Page 10 of 16
Figure 3-4 GPC and ID SMG’s summary and performance
Global Product Classification (GPC) Identification (ID)
Median days
in
development
2014 2015 2016 2017
2014 2015 2016 2017
Top WR
submitter GS1 Netherlands (2) Axicon Auto ID, LTD (3)
Highlights
GPC June 2017 Publication was published on June 28 2017. New classifications were added for flags, household furniture, stationary, audio
visual, and electrical supplies
GPC Milk/Milk Substitute work request is still underway and will be a significant change to associated bricks (WR 17-000030)
Development days are improving by implementing the Best-in-Class approach of only accepting Work Requests with a comprehensive business case and supporting details
eBallot approved expected General Specification publication July 2017
Consumer Product Variant Identifier
Right Shoe / Left Shoe GSCN in eBallot.
Expected publication July 2017
Risks: Temperature Monitor Sensor work request have not reached consensus to move forward to community review
Risk Mitigation: Options are being vetted and will be shared with ID SMG
Note: Traceability & Event Sharing SMG was not active in 2016 & 17 to date. Data Accuracy has minimal activity.
Legend:
All WR for year are closed WR are still open for year
3.5.2 Development work
A Work Order is categorised as development, if it involves creation of a new standard/guideline, or significant change to existing standard/guideline. Examples: extension to GDSN, a new EPCglobal High Frequency (HF) Air Interface Standard, enhancement to the EPCIS Standard to include
aggregation layers, a new barcode symbology, a new Business Message Standard. Development work is on-time, if the work is completed in, or under the estimated time to complete. The estimated completion date is defined in the project plan at the start of the development stage.
Table 3-9 Completed development work on-time performance Work
Request Topic
Due date per project plan
Date completed On time
16-394 update to GS1's "EPCIS and CBV Implementation Guideline"
February 2017 February 2017 Yes
4 Participation
Participants in GSMP are organisations (companies or other recognised entities); each organisation
is represented by one or more individual persons belonging to that organisation. There is no limit to the number of individuals from a single organisation that may participate. Companies not a member of GS1 are non-voting. There are three types of participating members:
1. GSMP community member (non-voting)
Company has signed GS1 Intellectual Property (IP) Policy
Individual has joined the GSMP group in GS1 Community Room
2. GSMP community member (voting)
Company is a member of GS1
Global Standards Management Process (GSMP) 2nd Quarter 2017 report
July 2017 © 2017 GS1 AISBL Page 11 of 16
Company has signed GS1 Intellectual Property (IP) Policy
Individual has joined the GSMP group in GS1 Community Room
3. GSMP Work Group Member
Company has signed the GS1 IP Policy
Company has signed a group Opt-in Agreement
Member has joined the GSMP group in GS1 Community Room
4.1 GSMP company membership
GSMP changed membership management systems in April of 2017. All companies who did not have active associates in the GS1 Community Room since January 1, 2016, were archived due to
inactivity.
GSMP has 333 active member companies, 287 companies are voting members and 46 companies are non-voting
Table 4-1 Member companies by interest category
Interest category # of participants
Academia 3
Association 9
Auto-ID 3
Central Bank 5
Data Pool 4
Distributor / Group Purchasing 7
Foodservice 1
Government Agency 6
GS1 Certified Data Pool 11
GS1 MO 53
Hospital 2
Logistics Provider 13
Manufacturer 86
Other 2
Regulatory Body 2
Retailer 36
Solution Provider 90
Grand Total 333
Table 4-2 Member companies by region
Region # of Companies
Asia Pacific 23
Europe 172
Middle East & Africa 12
The Americas 126
Total 333
4.2 Voting
Each company/organisation represents one vote in GSMP, regardless of the number of associates
voting. GSMP requirements and standards are approved by community eBallots. Each eBallot requires approximately 12 votes with additional minimum requirements of supply chain role votes (charter variations may apply). Due to system changes, voting statistics are not available for this quarter. Updated information will resume in Q3.
Global Standards Management Process (GSMP) 2nd Quarter 2017 report
July 2017 © 2017 GS1 AISBL Page 12 of 16
The average number of votes per ballot in Q1 was 19. Sixty Seven ballots (67) passed in Q1.
4.3 Event attendance
GS1 Global Office hosts two events every year for the GS1 community to collaborate face-to-face on
industry needs and the development of GS1 standards. These events are:
GS1 Standards Event, held in the USA
GS1 Industry and Standards Event, held in Europe
The GS1 Standards Event took place 20-24 March 2017 in Jersey City, New Jersey, USA. Attending the event were 200 individuals representing 66 companies.
Table 4-3 Event attendance by individual
Individual type 2014
Atlanta
2014
Rome
2015
Jersey City
2015
Warsaw
2016
Jersey City
2016 Brussels
2017 Jersey City
Affiliate, Associates, Auto-ID Lab, other
12 24 5 19 5 35 12
Data Pool and Solution Provider
32 68 21 42 25 63 19
Distributor / Group Purchasing and Manufacturer
38 26 28 24 30 29 17
Global Office Staff 51 54 51 53 49 80 50
GS1 MO 82 136 84 126 82 124 92
Hospital / Retailer 11 21 6 15 16 9 10
Total 226 329 195 279 207 340 200
Table 4-4 Event attendance by organisation
By organisation 2014
Atlanta
2014
Rome
2015
Jersey City
2015
Warsaw
2016
Jersey City
2016 Brussels
2017 Jersey City
Affiliate, Associates, Auto-ID Lab, other
11 20 5 15 5 26 7
Data Pool and Solution Provider
21 46 19 32 18 43 13
Distributor /
Group Purchasing and Manufacturer
20 22 19 16 24 25 15
Global Office staff 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
GS1 MO 25 32 22 30 24 27 23
Hospital and Retailer
8 13 5 10 13 6 7
Total 86 134 71 104 85 128 66
5 Quality
The GSMP defines quality as the entire process employed to ensure that all GS1 standards are user-driven, globally applicable, royalty-free (to the best of our ability) and that ultimately meets the
needs and requirements defined by its members.
Global Standards Management Process (GSMP) 2nd Quarter 2017 report
July 2017 © 2017 GS1 AISBL Page 13 of 16
5.1 Due process
All GSMP groups are expected to follow the processes and procedures specified in the GSMP Manual. A community eBallot is used to confirm community consensus to progress a draft standard, or other
GSMP deliverable.
5.2 Consensus
Decision-making is achieved through consensus, which is defined as approval without sustained opposition. Voting options are yes, no and abstain. Due to system changes, Q2 ballot data is not available. Updated data will resume in Q3.
Below are measures of due process and consensus in the GSMP:
Zero (0) due process infractions
87% of eBallots approved in Q1 were unanimous
99% of votes cast in Q1 were affirmative
5.3 Satisfaction survey results
GS1 issues several surveys to measure satisfaction with GSMP. Survey results are structured in three categories:
unfavourable = sum of very dissatisfied and fairly dissatisfied
neutral
favourable = sum of satisfied and very satisfied
Favourable and unfavourable answers are shown in percent using this structure: fav/unfav. Neutral
answers are not used in reporting the survey results, they are viewed as opportunities to move a response to favourable. The results of the three surveys are detailed in the next three sections.
5.3.1 GSMP member satisfaction survey
Overall satisfaction with GSMP rose 7 percentage points for the second year in a row, and reduced unsatisfactory ratings to a 4 year low. Staff satisfaction was down 5 percentage points, but is still the second highest rating in 4 years. Satisfaction with the GSMP process itself, maintained its 50% rating,
while achieving the least amount of unsatisfactory ratings in the last 4 years.
Figure 5-1 GSMP member satisfaction survey results
Global Standards Management Process (GSMP) 2nd Quarter 2017 report
July 2017 © 2017 GS1 AISBL Page 14 of 16
Table 5-1 GSMP member satisfaction survey results; satisfaction overall, with the staff, and with the process
Questions 2014 2015 2016 2017
Questions 20122013% FAVS/UNFAVS
Overall satisfaction with GSMP 57/7 57/13 64/8 71/3
Satisfaction with GSMP staff 73/4 66/9 81/2 76/3
Efficiency of process 39/14 43/17 50/8 50/5
5.3.2 GS1 Industry and Standards Event March 2017 satisfaction survey
Table 5-2 GS1 Event satisfaction survey results
Programme activity 2014
Atlanta 2014 Rome
2015 Jersey City
2015
Warsaw
2016 Jersey City
2016
Brussels
2017 Jersey City
Overall, how satisfied
were you with the GS1 Standards Event?
84/9 87/5 93/2 93/1 98/2 97/0 92/2
How satisfied were you with the event facilities? 73/9 60/17 94/2 91/4 99/0 79/6 91/0
How satisfied were you with the week's agenda? 69/16 81/5 75/7 89/11 96/4 98.2 88/13
How satisfied were you with the Tuesday Plenary?
72/9 62/8 76/9 68/16 93/7 80/7 92/0
Average 75% 73% 85% 85% 97% 89% 91%
5.3.3 GS1 Member Organisation satisfaction survey
Favourable responses from GS1 Member Organisations increased to 78%, the highest rating ever!
Figure 5-2 GSMP MO satisfaction survey results
Table 5-3 GS1 MO satisfaction survey results table
Question
% FAVS/UNFAVS
2014 2015 2016 2017
Overall satisfaction with GSMP 75/2 64/1 73/0 78/3
75
64
73 78
2014 2015 2016 2017
Global Standards Management Process (GSMP) 2nd Quarter 2017 report
July 2017 © 2017 GS1 AISBL Page 15 of 16
6 GSMP Governance Groups
6.1 Board Committee for Standards (BCS) members
Art Smith, GS1 Canada
Barron Witherspoon, Procter & Gamble Co.
Bernie Hogan, GS1 US
Elzbieta Halas, GS1 Poland
Jean-Marc Klopfenstein, Nestlé
Juan Antonio Sanfeliu, Manufacturas Antonio Gassol
Lori Bigler, J.M. Smucker Co.
Maria Palazzolo, GS1 Australia - Chairperson
Michael Rose, Johnson & Johnson
Miguel Lopera, GS1
Ulrich Schaefer, GS1 Germany
Vivek Balasubramanian, Amazon
Volker Zeiner, B. Braun
Wim van Herwijnen, METRO AG
Xavier Barras, GS1 France
6.2 Industry Engagement Steering Committee (IESC) members
Ana Paula Maniero, GS1 Brazil
Carrie Wilkie, GS1 US
Cédric Lecolley, GS1 France
Erin Hennessey, Procter & Gamble
Halim Recham, GS1 Algeria
Jeff Denton, Amerisource Bergen
Joachim Wilkins, C&A Europe / RSC Commercial Services
Loek Boortman, GS1 Netherlands
Marcel Sieira, GS1Australia
Mike Sadiwnyk, GS1 Canada
Mike Yorwerth, Tesco Global
Ruediger Hagedorn, Consumer Goods Forum
Virginia Vaamonde, GS1 Brazil
6.3 Architecture Group (AG) members
Dave Harty, Adents
Eugen Sehorz, GS1 Austria
Gina Tomassi, Pepsico
Henri Barthel, GS1 GO – Co‐Chair
Jens Kungl, Metro Group
Junyu Wang, Fudan Auto-ID Lab
Kevin Dean, GS1 Canada
Global Standards Management Process (GSMP) 2nd Quarter 2017 report
July 2017 © 2017 GS1 AISBL Page 16 of 16
Marc Cox, Philips
Mark Harrison, Milecastle Media
Paul Reid, GS1 UK
Ray Delnicki, GS1 US
Robert Beideman, GS1 GO
Roberto Matsubayashi, GS1 Brasil
Seán Lightholder, Walmart
Sean Lockhead, GS1 GO
Staffan Olsson, GS1 Sweden
Sue Schmid, GS1 Australia – Co‐Chair
Sylvia Rubio Alegren, ICA
Tony Zhang, FSEnet
Vera Feuerstein, Nestle – Co‐Chair
Xavier Barras, GS1 France
More information
Access this document and other GSMP reports at this website: http://www.gs1.org/gsmp/reports
Please contact Eileen Harpell with your questions or suggestions: [email protected]