gsmp franchise working session july 18, 2007. ©2005 gs1 2 gsmp: the global collaborative forum goal...

GSMP Franchise Working Session

July 18, 2007

©2005 GS12GSMP: The Global Collaborative Forum

Goal

• To enhance the GSMP Franchise Process and deliver “phase 2” documentation

• To incorporate additional feedback from the MO’s in the pilot


Agenda

• 1. Status report from existing Franchises. • This will be to provide feedback to the team on what's going on in your area, how the model is

working, etc.

• 2. Voting/Validation model. • Complete this model from the discussion in Budapest.

• 3. Moving from a "compiled" to an "ad hoc" Global Agenda environment. • It appeared from the last global agenda call and the feedback from the last survey, that we may be

having trouble synchronizing our meeting schedules. This has lead to feedback coming too late with development. A proposal is to work in a more extemporaneous environment. This will be the topic of discussion.

• 4. Management and Oversight of MO Franchises. • This topic will touch on the subject of overseeing administration of the Franchises. As we

discussed on the phone, this is a sensitive subject which I believe needs a creative solution.

• 5. Name Change: • As we move ahead, we need to begin thinking about the long term "go to market" name for the

Franchise process.

• 6. Other. • If you have any additional topics, feel free to let me know.


Status report from existing Franchises

• “We’re on the right track”• Confusion of use of Franchise for Simple vs.

Complex• Resource loads beginning to be known• Need for subject matter expertise identified• Still in a formative state• “When its going right, why vote?”


Status report from existing Franchises, cont

• Selectivity being used• Time• Relevance when divided by Business Unit• “Product” is not ready for prime time• Are we getting the right questions in a timely

manner from the development process?• Are we missing other opportunities?• Are we focusing on communicating the nature of

the problem we’re solving• Is the term “global agenda” confusing?


What does the new GSMP process look like, for Complex CR’s?

StatementOf

Business Need

Require-ments &

Gathering Analysis

BusinessSolutionDesign

TechnicalSolutionDesign

Pilot Posting

4 5 62 31

BRG Sponsored Work Groups

Sign UpDraft, Review,

and MotionCore

eBallotDraft, Review,

and MotionDraft, Review,

and MotionDraft, Review,

and Motion

StatementOf

Business Need

Require-ments &

Gathering Analysis

BusinessSolutionDesign

TechnicalSolutionDesign

Pilot Posting

4 5 62 31

GSMP Global BRGs and Work Groups

Sign UpDraft, Review,

and MotionPost to

websiteDraft, Review,

and MotionCore eballot

Pilot - update standard

MO Franchise Work GroupsGSMP MO Franchises

This feedback must occur

before eballot, during or around

TSD motion.Action: adjust

picture and documentation

accordingly


“No” Vote (Objections) Scenarios

Divergence(No Votes)

< 5 votes in all MO’s;

< 33% across all MO’s

FM’s add comments to public review

≥ 33% across all MO’s

FMO comment period;Mandatory 2nd motion

< 33% across all MO’s;

≥ 5 votes in any single MO’s

FMO comment period;Optional 2nd motion

Scenario 1

Scenario 2


Voting/Validation model

• Scenario 1: “Global” divergence• Means broad or uniform disagreement w the core

across the local communities

• Over 33% of aggregate of Franchise members say no.

• Remedy:

• Require a dialogue session with the BRG or work group…MO reps would communicate the rationale for “non-acceptance”

• Require a second eballot or motion


Voting/Validation model, cont

• Scenario 2: “Local” divergence• Overall, less than 33% of Franchise members

say no

• But one or more MO communities disagreeing with the core (No>33% at local level)

• Require a session with the BRG or WG for comment by the MO rep

• No required additional eballot


Calculation of “NO”

• Same as the core…33% say no, then the formal comment activity occurs

• Includes a minimum of 5 trading partners

• Note: • Less than 33%, “no” users can add comments

directly or join the core


Other points:

• Notes:• This process must align with core during the

public review/comment and motion to progress prior to pilot and eballot• (need to adjust picture)

• GA must be distributed prior to or during public review

• Action: need to analyse time allowance


Scenario One Comments

• Time impact concern (2 weeks too short)• Language concern (work needs to be

translated)• We need to balance speed against

consensus

• Time Problem:• Cycle time for a review

• Frequency of the global agenda


Notes On Common Global Agenda Issuance and Usage

• Need to move forward in separating truly simple from those now called simple but their not

• 30 day review• Formal Franchise outreach at the end of the

BRAD• Review current BRAD design for “business

worthy” language of key requirements• Fix dates for GA calls in advance (12

months), including feedback dates


Purpose of Feedback

• To understand if the requirements are complete• Are the requirements complete?

• To know if the world considers the solution effective• Is the solution valid, correct and complete?

• Technically sound

• Address the need

• To know if the world will migrate to the new standard• Will you implement the solution and when?


Improving Requirements Gathering Feedback

• Need to communicate the problem and the requirements clearly

• Are the requirements complete?

• Add “Business Function/Purpose” information from the CR to the GA

• Ensure the problem is stated in business terms


Management and Oversight of MO Franchises

• Issue• Is the local MO prepared to administer a

Franchise?

• Do they have an engaged community?

• Do they know the resource requirements and are they prepared to devote the resources?

• Are they aware of the intent of the program?

• Do they agree to the required norms?


Tools

• Check list of success criteria and readiness report

• Documentation/Launch kit• Franchise application and approval process• MO Franchise Oversight Team• “MO buddy system”


Criteria

• Must be directly involved in GSMP• Must have strong GSMP process knowledge• Must have GS1 system & business process subject

matter expertise• Must have ability to translate from English• Must have a community of users that the MO is

currently engaged with• Must follow a philosophy of collaboration (applies to

MO facilitator and member)• Must devote sufficient resource time to execute the

process…1 FTE (including GSMP engagement)


Franchise Oversight by Process Group

• Assure “on-boarding” tools and support are adequate and provided

• Oversees the Execution of the application process• An application template will be developed• Applications will be submitted to the Process

Group

• Review concerns and appeals, submit recommendations on actions to BCS


Name Change

• GSMP Precincts• GSMP Regional• GSMP Regional Involvement Process• GSMP Local User Connection• Global User Connection• RSMP – Regional Standards Management Process• Regional User Management Process• Regional Standards Validation Process• Regional Standards Development• GSMP-NET• GSMP Local User Communities• GSMP Outreach Process• GSMP Satellites• GSMP Satellite Network• Global Community Network• Global Standards Network• Extended GSMP• GSMP Extended Engagement Committees/Communities• GSMP MO Deployment• GSMP MO Network• GSMP Network• GSMP Regional Assessment – Development – Action – Response (RADAR)


Next Steps

1. The new voting/validation model will be written up and communicated to the process group for approval

2. The proposal for extension of all public review periods to 30 days will be proposed also to the Process Group

3. There will be a review of the BRAD to analyse the document for improved communication of business rationale (for communication to the Franchises)

4. The Oversight process will be proposed to the Process Group (inclusive of application process)

5. We will continue to search for a new name


Thank You

gsmp franchise working session july 18, 2007. ©2005 gs1 2 gsmp: the global collaborative forum goal...

Documents

global agenda slide

gsmp global brgs

motion slide

global divergence

gsmp franchise process

core slide

global agenda environment

motion draft